Hillary: In his own way, Loughner was a political extremist

posted at 4:15 pm on January 12, 2011 by Allahpundit

Via Breitbart. Oh, Hillary. Hillary, Hillary, Hillary.

“Based on what I know, this is a criminal defendant who was in some ways motivated by his own political views, who had a particular animus toward the congresswoman,” Clinton said. “And I think when you cross the line from expressing opinions that are of conflicting differences in our political environment into taking action, that’s violent action, that’s a hallmark of extremism, whether it comes from the right, the left, from al Qaeda, from anarchists, whoever it is. That is a form of extremism. So yes, I think that when you’re a criminal who is in some way pursuing criminal activity connected to — however bizarre and poorly thought through — your political views, that’s a form of extremism.”

By this definition, Hinckley was a political extremist too. Reagan was, after all, a political figure, and Hinckley certainly did have a “particular animus” towards him. I’m not sure what she means by Loughner’s “political views,” though: Supposedly, he developed his grudge against Giffords because she couldn’t answer a question he asked her about language, which makes him more of a, shall we say, linguistic extremist. But “linguistic extremism” doesn’t help the Democrats’ narrative, so here’s the Smartest Woman in the World slyly giving the left’s “right-wing hate” storyline a boost while being very careful not to imply anything too concrete about Loughner’s actual motivations. This is a nice example, in fact, of what I wrote about yesterday vis-a-vis her husband and Dick Morris strategizing to blame Republicans for Oklahoma City by tossing out subtle, indirect suggestions of culpability and letting the public connect the dots itself. That’s what Hillary’s doing here — Loughner’s an extremist, he was motivated by his own special brand of “politics,” he had certain opinions that conflicted with the opinions of others, wink wink. All of that’s arguably true depending upon how you define the terms, which is where the dot-connecting comes in. Fill in the blanks, America.

Her other goal, per her comments about Loughner in Abu Dhabi the other day, is to reassure the “international community” that America has its own terrorists too. That’s of a piece with the left’s traditional approach to foreign policy, that whatever one might think of American exceptionalism, it’s bad form and actually counterproductive to go around reminding other nations of it. Said Hillary of Loughner to her audience in the UAE, “We have the same kinds of problems.” Except, of course, we don’t: If, for example, Pakistan’s biggest worry was untreated schizophrenics opening fire outside supermarkets, geopolitics on the subcontinent would look very, very different. As it is, when one of their politicians gets shot for defending blasphemers of Islam, the assassin is roundly applauded. But see, “we have the same problems.”

Exit question: Is there such a thing as a homicidal lunatic who isn’t “extreme”?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

“Hillary would’ve been better than Obama.” Uh…no.

Django on January 12, 2011 at 4:18 PM

Hillary, stop talking. You are obviously not informed enough about the case to opine about it.

portlandon on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

You have a Hillary post today, and don’t have a way to work in her tripping going into the plane?

Alas, I thought I knew ye, Allahpundit. :-)

Abby Adams on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

Disgraceful.

Indy82 on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

Exit question: Is there such a thing as a homicidal lunatic who isn’t “extreme”?

Joel Rifkin was pretty laid-back about the whole thing.

MadisonConservative on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

For some reason (I have no evidence) – I have this suspicion that Hillary is starting to tip the bottle a little, or maybe a lot.

Not because of this – she just looks so ratty lately.

jake-the-goose on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

She has been out of the country for way too long.

singlemalt_18 on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

Hmmm … a statement without courage, or much sense.

I recommend we replace Hillary Clinton with a sack of potatos and a lap top. The lap top can be programmed to periodically spit out random statements like the above.

We could rename the Secretary of State office the Secretary of Spambot office.

darwin on January 12, 2011 at 4:20 PM

That’s of a piece with the left’s traditional approach to foreign policy, that whatever one might think of American exceptionalism, it’s bad form and actually counterproductive to go around reminding other nations of it. Said Hillary of Loughner to her audience in the UAE, “We have the same kinds of problems.”

Deeply irresponsible to give cover for terror the way she does.

“We do it too, we’re you”.

the_nile on January 12, 2011 at 4:20 PM

And I think when you cross the line from expressing opinions that are of conflicting differences in our political environment into taking action, that’s violent action, that’s a hallmark of extremism,

SecState delcares Islam to be “extremism” by deed.

BobMbx on January 12, 2011 at 4:20 PM

Exit question: Is there such a thing as a homicidal lunatic who isn’t “extreme”?

Mao? Che? Castro?

/leftie

Kataklysmic on January 12, 2011 at 4:20 PM

This is nothing like Islamic extremism, Hillary. Islamic extremism and other forms of religious extremism have a coherent ideology and a community of believers. Loughner was a loner with no coherent ideology. I’m sad to see it but this is terrible.

alwaysfiredup on January 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM

The left is certainly a stain on history.

blatantblue on January 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM

The right-wing conspiracy?

It’s vast. Vast!

John the Libertarian on January 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM

In a non-political sense, of course.

ThePrez on January 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM

Featherbedwetter Clyburn could not be reached for comment.

Christien on January 12, 2011 at 4:22 PM

“Hillary would’ve been better than Obama.” Uh…no.

Django on January 12, 2011 at 4:18 PM

Well, actually, yes. She would have.

This isn’t a compliment to Hillary as much as a stark reminder just how f*cking awful Obama is.

You-Eh-Vee on January 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM

Jared Loughner is a political activist like Snooki Polizzi is an astrophysicist.

RBMN on January 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM

It all depends on what your definition of “is”…er…”political” is.

Conservative in NOVA on January 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM

I recommend we replace Hillary Clinton with a sack of potatos and a lap top. The lap top can be programmed to periodically spit out random statements like the above.

We could rename the Secretary of State office the Secretary of Spambot office.

darwin on January 12, 2011 at 4:20 PM

I think you’re on to something here.

Why don’t we send teleprompters to all these foreign places, and turn them towards the crowd. You don’t need a battalion of Secret Service guys running around pretending not to be Secret Service guys to protect it.

And it can’t answer questions.

I don’t see a downside.

BobMbx on January 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM

Watch the plane thing. She sure looks like she was tipping a few to me and you can’t even really see her face. The way she is gripping the railing on the way up the stairs looks like someone who knows their balance is off and tries to negotiate a difficult terrain. It is worth watching.

ORconservative on January 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM

Hillary, stop talking. You are obviously not informed enough about the case to opine about it.

portlandon on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

Hate to break it to you, but she is the Secretary of State, and Arizona is a state, so it’s her job to opine on this.

/

Christien on January 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM

Does Hillary ‘know’ him, like in a Biblical sense?

belad on January 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM

For some reason (I have no evidence) – I have this suspicion that Hillary is starting to tip the bottle a little, or maybe a lot.

Not because of this – she just looks so ratty lately.

jake-the-goose on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

I have no proof that she is drinking either, but she did fall earlier today. And drunks do fall when they are drinking…

darclon on January 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM

Christien on January 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM

LOL!

portlandon on January 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM

BobMbx on January 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM

I like!

darwin on January 12, 2011 at 4:27 PM

Hillary would have us all enter into “the willing suspension of disbelief” or something.

fourdeucer on January 12, 2011 at 4:27 PM

It’s the same old dirty Hillary of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. She just can’t help herself. She’s at it again.

petefrt on January 12, 2011 at 4:28 PM

For some reason (I have no evidence) – I have this suspicion that Hillary is starting to tip the bottle a little, or maybe a lot.

Not because of this – she just looks so ratty lately.

jake-the-goose on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

Goose, I was thinking the same thing. On several occasions she’s looked hung over and in a few photos s##t faced.

Mason on January 12, 2011 at 4:28 PM

I think she hit her head a little too hard on that fall on the airplane the other day….DUH!!!!!!!!

SDarchitect on January 12, 2011 at 4:28 PM

This from the lady who made ” Vast right-wing conspiracy” a common political term.

NeoKong on January 12, 2011 at 4:28 PM

I see Democrats continue to double down on stupid.

Apparently, Sec Clinton knows something the rest of us don’t know. She also seems to know something that this loons friends, family, and acquaintances didn’t know, either.

At this point, I encourage Democrats to continue – PLEASE CONTINUE, to push this propaganda. 59% of the people don’t believe the guys was politically motivated? If Dems continue to push this, we can get this number up to 75% by Friday and Sarah Palin can become the most sympathetic person in history.

ramrants on January 12, 2011 at 4:29 PM

I’ll be waiting for the post at Hillbuzz criticizing this just like they’ve been criticizing all the others who have been politicizing the shooting.

Mark1971 on January 12, 2011 at 4:29 PM

Did she say this before or after her face-plant?

:D

ColdWarrior57 on January 12, 2011 at 4:30 PM

A missed opportunity to be silent.

Mallard T. Drake on January 12, 2011 at 4:30 PM

MadisonConservative on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

heh.

tommer74 on January 12, 2011 at 4:31 PM

In her own way, she’s a blithering idiot.

JammieWearingFool on January 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM

AS long as the left has a safe venue (MSM) to spew their propaganda unchallenged, this country will continue to stagnate in a political mire. The Tea Party is more necessary than ever and as we have seen from Simpson and the much of the rest of the republican leadership, we are on our own folks. To return this country to it’s constitutional roots, we are going to have to do it ourselves.

csdeven on January 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM

They know they could lie at will.

artist on January 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM

Nailed it Mallard!

GarandFan on January 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM

Hillary knows not what she’s talking about.

She stumbled today, literally and metaphorically.

Schadenfreude on January 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM

Keep talking Hillary…….we remember your 2003 rant about Patriotism and dissent.

These Progressive clowns………STILL WAITING ON GOP LEADERSHIP TO SHOW to defend Conservatives………Crickets chirping!!!

PappyD61 on January 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM

One more frikkin’ partisan hack imbecile flappin’ her empty gums.

Airhead of State.

profitsbeard on January 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM

She has been out of the country for way too long.

singlemalt_18 on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

She’s out of her mind on this one, or not informed.

Schadenfreude on January 12, 2011 at 4:35 PM

Yeah, Hillary, stay in the middle east with all those women’s rights lovers.
Her rhetoric needs toning down.

lonestar1 on January 12, 2011 at 4:37 PM

Can’t wait for the video putting obama, hillary and Sarah side by side on this. The stark contrast, if done entertainingly, should go viral.

Meanwhile, the world once again is treated to the Great U.S.A. in paralysis; rudderless with Cap’n Marlboro at the helm, led in descending spirals by his hysterical, evil-minded leftist politicos/media, while the GOP stands frozen in motionless fear, all of our energy/economic/employment national crises deepen, obama preens….

….and only Sarah Palin, the one who was supposed to be laid away by all of the above rabid hyenas and useless idiots, rises to the top, shines like a Northern Light and LEADS.

Palin 2012 – God be with her and with us all.

tigerlily on January 12, 2011 at 4:37 PM

All that enemy fire she has come under has taken its toll.

fourdeucer on January 12, 2011 at 4:38 PM

she must have bumped her head hard yesterday.

ctmom on January 12, 2011 at 4:38 PM

“That’s what Hillary’s doing here — Loughner’s an extremist, he was motivated by his own special brand of “politics,” he had certain opinions that conflicted with the opinions of others, wink wink…”

Sounds familiar…

Seven Percent Solution on January 12, 2011 at 4:39 PM

You’d expect better from the smartest people in the room.

Mord on January 12, 2011 at 4:40 PM

Did I just hear a witch cackle?

“Hillary would’ve been better than Obama.” Uh…no.

Django on January 12, 2011 at 4:18 PM

Hillary would have been just as destructive as BO. I think people are just out of sight out of mind on her. They’ve forgotten she’s just as nasty & worthless as BO is.
And we would have had at least one major sex scandal involving interns & Bill.
Plus I certainly have not forgotten what happened to Vince Foster.
Haven’t forgotten all the $$ she made in cattle futures.
Nor have I forgotten Whitewater.
No thanks.
Perhaps BO being POTUS was a sick blessing in disguise bcs maybe it’s waking the worthless American electorate up from their selfish apathetic sleep.

Badger40 on January 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM

The important thing here to me is that this is all stagecraft. Hillary doesn’t make these comments without approval from above. Something to keep in mind as Obama (presumably) attempts to project himself as above the fray on this later.

stldave on January 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM

Blood libel.

TheBigOldDog on January 12, 2011 at 4:42 PM

Is Hillary out of the country…or on another planet?

BuckeyeSam on January 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM

This from the lady who made ” Vast right-wing conspiracy” a common political term.

NeoKong on January 12, 2011 at 4:28 PM

I thought the lefty meme was that only deranged, unstable people believed in conspiracies. And although conspiracies do indeed exist, painting tens of millions of average “right wing” Americans as conspirators is the height of weird. How did she get the nerve to make this statement and not get labeled a loon by the right? Did the right miss their chance at the time? And does the saying, “it’s never too late” apply here? I will never understand how she made this statement and not only did not get labeled a crazy lady, but was actually taken seriously.

tigerlily on January 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM

Goose, I was thinking the same thing. On several occasions she’s looked hung over and in a few photos s##t faced.

Mason on January 12, 2011 at 4:28 PM

I swear,,, I am so glad I am not alone thinking this.

The woman often looks like a poster for the day after a booze fest.

jake-the-goose on January 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM

Since I’ve already said anyone would be better than the jackass, I guess that includes Hillary. But let’s say marginally better. After the disastrous Russian ‘reset’ trip, I started to wonder why anyone thought she was presidential material.

slickwillie2001 on January 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM

“Based on what I know, Mark David Chapman was in some ways motivated by his own musical views, and had a particular animus toward John Lennon,”

Sound stupid? That’s because it is and Hillary’s drivel is no less so.

RadClown on January 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM

Mallard T. Drake on January 12, 2011 at 4:30 PM

“Tis better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than open one’s mouth and remove all doubt.” -Dr. Samuel Johnson

odat on January 12, 2011 at 4:47 PM

Just remember, according to the left, guns don’t kill people – keyboards do!

Don L on January 12, 2011 at 4:47 PM

facepalm.

Mr. D on January 12, 2011 at 4:48 PM

The woman often looks like a poster for the day after a booze fest.

jake-the-goose on January 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM

Re letting her appearance go to hell, that’s the one thing that makes me think that around mid-2010, Hillary gave up ever running for office again.

slickwillie2001 on January 12, 2011 at 4:49 PM

In her own way, she’s a blithering idiot.

JammieWearingFool on January 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM

Exit question: Is there such a thing as a Leftist who isn’t “a blithering idiot.”?

Chip on January 12, 2011 at 4:49 PM

“Her other goal, per her comments about Loughner in Abu Dhabi the other day, is to reassure the “international community” that America has its own terrorists too.”

Of all the lame, truly lame, things to try to impress on foreign governments, this has got to rank near the top when it comes to stupid diplomacy.

In a few words Hillary just told the rest of the world, the Middle East in particular, that having Hezzbollah, or Hamas, or Al-Qaeda running around killing people is no big deal, since well, we have our own “terrists” to deal with…just like the rest of the world. Certainly undercuts any hope of using “Smart Diplomacy” to get nations of the world to stay focused on real threats now, doesn’t it?

There is no similarity at all between Loughner in Tucson and Anwar al-Awlaki, or Osama bin-Ladin, or any other Islamic extremist who has gathered a flock of followers hell bent on killing anyone, Muslims and infidels alike, who do not suscribe to their particular jihadist ideals.

[Except maybe they all suffer from extreme mental deficiencies...]

But that is certainly not what Hillary is implying.

And this woman would be President? Not on your life.

coldwarrior on January 12, 2011 at 4:49 PM

Phew, we are safe. At least Loughner was not made out to be a VICTIM of the political extremism…..

Sir Napsalot on January 12, 2011 at 4:50 PM

Is there such a thing as a homicidal lunatic who isn’t “extreme”?

A homicidal lunatic who kills just one person in protest of other homicidal lunatics committing mass murder?

thuja on January 12, 2011 at 4:52 PM

Just say it Hillary: It was a VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY! You know you want to.

conservative pilgrim on January 12, 2011 at 4:55 PM

OT

((Daydreaming))….Mmmmmmmmm thinking thoughts on who would make a great President and VP….mmmmmmmmmmmm

Donald Trump For President!!

Sarah Palin for Vice President!!

What a ticket eh?

((Daydream off))….

RoxanneH on January 12, 2011 at 4:56 PM

Aren’t all murderers effectively saying we shouldn’t have blanket homicide laws? Aren’t thieves effectively saying that property laws are non-binding?

Yes, crime as political speech. Proof positive that the Dems want some way to save face over the weekend glut of political hyperbole and character assassination.

She argues as well as her husband, depending on your meaning of “is”.

Axeman on January 12, 2011 at 4:59 PM

This is the Secretary of State for the Obama administration.

She is either speaking out of turn and at odds with Obama, in which case he’s failing to rein her in, especially in the wake of her “extremists” (note the plural) rhetoric of the other day.

Which means she most likely is speaking what the Obama administration really thinks and is perpetuating this malicious angle while Obama will try to assume his much vaunted (even by the likes of Brit Hume) “above the fray” position even though it would really be a fraud (I know, everyone act surprised).

No, this is not acceptable and they need to be called on this.

Cindy Cooper on January 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM

Exit question: Is there such a thing as a homicidal lunatic who isn’t “extreme”?

My thought exactly. This is a perfect example of dumbing a term down to the point where it has no meaning.

nukemhill on January 12, 2011 at 5:01 PM

For some reason (I have no evidence) – I have this suspicion that Hillary is starting to tip the bottle a little, or maybe a lot.

Not because of this – she just looks so ratty lately.

jake-the-goose on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

I have no proof that she is drinking either, but she did fall earlier today. And drunks do fall when they are drinking…

darclon on January 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM

Maybe she’s just getting old and tired. That job would kill me and I’m waaaaaayy younger than ol’ Hills.

LASue on January 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM

Was the uni-bomber a political extremist?

tarpon on January 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM

More sound bites to be used against her if she runs again. Thanks Hil for another Clinton ‘depends on what the definition of is, is’ moment. Sure, you’re electable.

JimP on January 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM

Hillary is loyal to the party line? Who knew?

Skandia Recluse on January 12, 2011 at 5:04 PM

Remember years ago, some guy protesting something, nuclear shipments perhaps, fell on a train track as he was protesting, and the train ran over his legs, severing them both. And Russia pointing to this as an example of the cruelty of the US govt. When in fact the US govt didn’t have anything to do with it, and the train engineer felt awful about it. What Hillary is saying reminds me of what Russia said about the US then. This shooting isn’t a consequence of our politics, but she claims it is to serve her own purposes. Gross dishonesty in both cases.

Paul-Cincy on January 12, 2011 at 5:06 PM

In her own way, she’s a blithering idiot.

JammieWearingFool on January 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM

Exit question: Is there such a thing as a Leftist who isn’t “a blithering idiot.”?

Chip on January 12, 2011 at 4:49 PM

Show a little compassion please…she’s probably afflicted with that Liberal Gene don’cha know.

P. Monk on January 12, 2011 at 5:08 PM

Was the uni-bomber a political extremist?

tarpon on January 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM

Eco terrorist.

the_nile on January 12, 2011 at 5:08 PM

Morris already spilled the bean about Bubba’s plan to pin this on the right via Ricochet Effect, so Hillrod resorted to their Plan B: VRWC.

Maybe Arizona’s Secretary of State Bennett and Guv Brewer should read Hillary’s job description out loud on air…or, better yet, put her some knowledge on foreign affairs.

Christien on January 12, 2011 at 5:09 PM

In a few words Hillary just told the rest of the world, the Middle East in particular, that having Hezzbollah, or Hamas, or Al-Qaeda running around killing people is no big deal, since well, we have our own “terrists” to deal with…just like the rest of the world.
coldwarrior on January 12, 2011 at 4:49 PM

By her using that example she has reduced our country, deliberately, to the lowest common denominator. That is unforgivable and inexplicable. Of course Obama has the same views.

fourdeucer on January 12, 2011 at 5:09 PM

By her using that example she has reduced our country, deliberately, to the lowest common denominator. That is unforgivable and inexplicable. Of course Obama has the same views.

fourdeucer on January 12, 2011 at 5:09 PM

It’s almost treason.

the_nile on January 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM

Joel Rifkin was pretty laid-back about the whole thing.

MadisonConservative on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

My nice clean monitor! Damn you MC.

katy the mean old lady on January 12, 2011 at 5:13 PM

Did the right miss their chance at the time? And does the saying, “it’s never too late” apply here? I will never understand how she made this statement and not only did not get labeled a crazy lady, but was actually taken seriously.

tigerlily on January 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM

You obviously weren’t a member of the VRWC. We reveled in the accusation even though, as a conspiracy, we weren’t efficiently conspiring if she found out. Must have been the vastness of it all that let the word get out. Lose lips, and all that…

karl9000 on January 12, 2011 at 5:13 PM

In a few words Hillary just told the rest of the world, the Middle East in particular, that having Hezzbollah, or Hamas, or Al-Qaeda running around killing people is no big deal, since well, we have our own “terrists” to deal with…just like the rest of the world.
coldwarrior on January 12, 2011 at 4:49 PM

By her using that example she has reduced our country, deliberately, to the lowest common denominator. That is unforgivable and inexplicable. Of course Obama has the same views.

fourdeucer on January 12, 2011 at 5:09 PM

Unity. Its really important to the leftists.

BobMbx on January 12, 2011 at 5:13 PM

Did you see her busting her butt getting on a plane?

Nearly Nobody on January 12, 2011 at 5:14 PM

Loughner was a political extremist

I actually agree.

He is a left wing political extremist, who took his marching orders from DailyKOS.

Rebar on January 12, 2011 at 5:18 PM

I, for one, am relieved that all that speculation about bodies littering the Clintons’ path to power was not true. Otherwise, this would seem like a rather strange comment by Lady MacBeth Mrs. Clinton.

Christien on January 12, 2011 at 5:18 PM

The Muslim man who executes an attack for Allah and the greater Muslim Ummah’ is a certifiable nutjob.

An actual nutjob who shoots because he’s disturbed is a certifiable right wing conspirator.

The mind of the liberal is a dark, disturbing, convoluted place.

blatantblue on January 12, 2011 at 5:18 PM

There’s Hillary, never missing a chance to make herself a part of the story. /s

scalleywag on January 12, 2011 at 5:19 PM

We’re all extremists, now.

SlaveDog on January 12, 2011 at 5:24 PM

Did you see her busting her butt getting on a plane?

Nearly Nobody on January 12, 2011 at 5:14 PM

-
Surprising considering her rather low center of gravity.

diogenes on January 12, 2011 at 5:25 PM

“And I think when you cross the line from expressing opinions that are of conflicting differences in our political environment into taking action, that’s violent action, that’s a hallmark of extremism, whether it comes from the right, the left, from al Qaeda, from anarchists, whoever it is. That is a form of extremism. So yes, I think that when you’re a criminal who is in some way pursuing criminal activity connected to — however bizarre and poorly thought through — your political views, that’s a form of extremism.”

Is she also arguing that Al Qaeda should be treated as “criminals” and not “enemy combatants” and “terrorists”? And by her definition Cho of Virginia Tech was an “extremist” based on his political views which were all about hating rich people and stuff.

Buy Danish on January 12, 2011 at 5:30 PM

Note they never say what his extremist views were, yet, somehow every Tom, Dick and Hillary is suddenly an expert on this mass murderer. It’s getting to the point where you wonder who is more delusional, the left, or the lunatic who shot these people?

scalleywag on January 12, 2011 at 5:33 PM

Someone tell me just what political views he’s expressed? From what I’ve read he’s not posed any views at all. He’s asked a lot of rambling questions about nothing, posted a lot of comments about being angry and frustrated, but I’ve seen nothing about the wars, health care, the economy, unemployment, the TSA, nothing. Surely there’s something besides killing people that we don’t know about that makes these “experts” so sure he’s a right wing extremist, right? What is it?

scalleywag on January 12, 2011 at 5:38 PM

MadisonConservative on January 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM

Comedy gold right there.

DeweyWins on January 12, 2011 at 5:40 PM

This woman must never be allowed to run for president. She is generally careful about expressing her radical views, but no one should believe that she not a radical leftist ruling-class elitist who lives by moral relativism and to whom government is God.

maryo on January 12, 2011 at 5:40 PM

Oh please, all this woman is capable of is spouting generic, pap. She has a stock inventory of terms that she spews every time she opens her maw. You know that vocab: disappointed, extremist, consequences, unacceptable, etc. She has become a walking cliche. A charicature of a human being. Completely tone deaf, completely unhuman, she has morphed in to banal, trite, triviality-spewing automaton.

MJBrutus on January 12, 2011 at 5:55 PM

She doesn’t sound much more coherent than Loughner.

Common Sense on January 12, 2011 at 5:56 PM

Comment pages: 1 2