Quotes of the day
posted at 10:30 pm on January 5, 2011 by Allahpundit
“‘I don’t think that more than 20 of the 87 [Republican freshmen] would vote to increase the national debt,” said another of the new members in close talks with colleagues about the vote.
“The sense among new members is that, for a significant number of them, a vote to raise the debt ceiling would be unconscionable in light of their campaign promises…
“‘The same folks who told us that if you didn’t do bailouts, ‘we’d fail’ are saying, ‘If you don’t raise the debt ceiling, you’ll have the same thing,’’ said Tim Huelskamp, an incoming freshman GOP legislator from Kansas. ‘Raising the debt ceiling without seriously bringing debt under control is certainly unsustainable economically and politically. And if [legislators] didn’t get that message the first time, there’ll be another election two years from now that will be the same thing.’”
***
“And despite wide agreement that a showdown is looming over tea partiers’ willingness to authorize more debt, the freshmen members of Congress indicated that they can support a higher national debt limit — if it’s accompanied by an agreement to achieve a balanced budget.
“‘I personally think that’s the answer,’ [Sen. Mike] Lee said.
“‘If there’s a balanced budget Constitutional amendment that is tied to the debt ceiling, I will vote to increase the debt limit under those conditions,’ Rep.-elect Mo Brooks, R-Ala., said. ‘But we have to make progress. This unsustainable deficit that we are incurring is the greatest national security threat that American faces.’”
“When asked about the controversy voting to increase the debt limit might cause, one member had strong words: ‘There is a time for campaigning and a time to govern,’ Guinta said.”
***
“‘The debt ceiling is a pivotal issue, a linchpin issue,’ says Peter Bordow, a Tea Party organizer in Arizona.
“‘There needs to be a broad understanding of the effect of this decision, but I think we are inevitably going to need to swallow a difficult pill someday,’ he says. ‘Not raising the debt ceiling may be that difficult pill.’
“That position has been echoed by newly elected Tea Party-backed House Republicans, including Mike Kelly, a Pennsylvania car dealer. ‘Raising the debt ceiling is absolutely irresponsible,’ he said during an appearance on CBS News…
“And GOP Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, founder of the House Tea Party Caucus, said recently that she is ‘not looking to shut the government down’ but is gathering signatures on a petition to prevent a debt ceiling increase.”
***
“In the past decade, experts on both sides have boasted about permanent majorities. The country has no time for such foolishness.
“Our future is as uncertain and tenuous as at any point in our history. The perfect political moment to tackle our debt problem will always be a mirage just beyond the horizon of the next election.
“The time for hard choices, and leadership that honors our heritage of service and sacrifice, is now…
“I’d suggest the new members have a chance to secure not just an outpost, but a beachhead for freedom in a struggle as significant as any in our history.
“For new members, this can be your D-Day against debt, and the dissolution of the republic itself. You can make history not with your words, but with your actions.”
***
“Ron declared that he is not in favor of raising the debt ceiling saying ‘I never voted for any of the spending, so why should I raise the debt for the people who’ve been spending the money? For me it’s a very comfortable vote.’ Ron admitted if the debt limit isn’t increased it will cause problems, but thought that the alternative of continuing to borrow and spend endless money is much worse, and instead would rather face reality today.
“The younger Paul dismissed Goolsbee’s warning and claimed since President Obama voted against raising the debt ceiling as a senator, ‘it’s a little disingenuous for [his] people to say ‘oh the sky is falling if we don’t do it.” However, Rand is a bit more pragmatic than his father, suggesting ‘I’ll vote to raise the debt ceiling if we attach a balanced budget rule to it. If they say no more debt will be added and from here on out we’ll balance the budget, I’ll vote one time to raise the debt ceiling.’”
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


It’s come to this: Venezuela approves funds to relieve the toilet-paper shortage

Video: Dem Congressman rips IRS for abuses, threatens bringing in special prosecutor






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Have you read some of the people of who comment around here AP?
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM
“the babies”
That, right there, is all you need to know.
UnderstandingisPower on May 22, 2013 at 6:46 PM
Good point.
KCB on May 22, 2013 at 6:46 PM
Not even Gosnell’s attorney could sit in that courtroom, and see those images, and not come away unaffected. I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: No wonder the MSM ran from this trial like it was the plague.
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:47 PM
This really is a disgusting and self serving comment, all living things are viable until they die, the only thing taking a babies viability away is the abortionist.
clearbluesky on May 22, 2013 at 6:53 PM
[NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM]
It’s Mary Katharine.
Dusty on May 22, 2013 at 6:54 PM
DITTO, what “clearbluesky” wrote ^^.
Lourdes on May 22, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Understanding and lenient? To defend a guy who brutally murdered babies? How about without conscience and evil?
Understanding and lenient implies empathy and mercy are possible emotions to have toward those who are willing to either kill a child or have the child they are carrying be killed. The choice is between death and life for a baby.
Sorrow, grief, and anger for the unborn child are appropriate emotions to have. Empathy and mercy are for those who have repented and turned from this evil.
INC on May 22, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Oops. Sorry MKH.
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:56 PM
Gosnell didn’t have to keep his place so filthy, inspections or not. He didn’t have to re-use single-use instruments, or keep the parts of murdered babies in jars. He is simply a vile piece of human trash.
A sixteen week window is never going to be tolerated by the violent baby-killing Left who will do anything to stop it from becoming law. As MKH notes above, they’re not supportive of a twenty-week limit. I bet many in NARAL (which should be spelled ‘gnarl’ like the acronym sounds — twisted) think there should be no limit at all, even killing the infant just as he’s being born if the mother changes her mind about keeping him.
I don’t blame the lawyer for doing his job, and agree with the sixteen week limit as a first step. But if I were a defense attorney, I’d never have taken the case.
Liam on May 22, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Well, I can see why they’d go along with this, because you can still kill a LOT of babies in 16 weeks, but I’m not quite ready to call this progressjust yet.
Kensington on May 22, 2013 at 7:08 PM
“A person’s a person, no matter how small.”
INC on May 22, 2013 at 7:15 PM
That’s the excuse of a 5 year old child. It doesn’t take regulators for you to keep your place clean. But butcher Gosnell was simply interested in making more money for himself.
rbj on May 22, 2013 at 7:16 PM
Going to sixteen or seventeen weeks is definitely a step in the right direction. Know what would be a better step? Zero weeks. Just saying.
Shump on May 22, 2013 at 7:17 PM
I thought McMahon was a sleaze when he used the race card during the trial. Now I know hes slime because of his vociforous defending of this monster after he was convicted of murder. Meagan is wrong and we can tar him with the same brush as his client. He is as vile as Gosnell
neyney on May 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM
Oh we can’t have that. Dear Reaper, I mean Dear Leader wants it to be 39 weeks.
VorDaj on May 22, 2013 at 7:20 PM
In that, he is incorrect. It was the willful abandonment of existing regulation enforcement by the state, due to a political climate created by groups such as NARAL and PP that led directly to the situation at Gosnell’s clinic. It’s blood on their hands as much as his.
A new law, enforced as well as the old, will do exactly as well; meaning not at all. In the Navy we have a saying – you can expect what you inspect.
Jeff Weimer on May 22, 2013 at 7:30 PM
I don’t really care what this legal streetwalker has to say, aside from from a bemused curiosity regarding self-debasement. There was never any real question as to what the demon butcher Gosnell had been doing; this mercenary apologist as much acknowledges that he was comfortable with the practice in theory if not -belatedly- in actual gruesome reality.
So lawyer McMahon took the money, and defended the indefensible. And now he tries reassert his humanity by musing depressively about the macabre procession that has just come to a meat-grinding halt. But he willingly marched a leg in that procession; at least he didn’t portray his steps, in tired fashion, as necessary measures in assuring that “the system works for all.”
I hope that for the rest of his life, his last thought before tortured sleep is of scissors.
M240H on May 22, 2013 at 7:36 PM
And that right there is one of the big horrors of the abortion industry. That 83.5% of abortions are performed for no greater reason than the mother doesn’t want the baby or the hassel of giving birth and putting the baby up for adoption.
It is if you are a liberal who can’t think for yourself and insist on regulating every aspect of life.
hopeful on May 22, 2013 at 7:46 PM
Exactly. “Unwanted puppies and unwanted babies are the same thing.”~thujackass
davidk on May 22, 2013 at 7:49 PM
Never forget that the Allies once having liberated the concentration camps / death camps had to force march the local citizens through those camps to shock them into realization of the holocaust their pretending what was happening wasn’t happening had enabled.
— counting the seconds until psycho thuja spams us with his collaborationist prattle.
viking01 on May 22, 2013 at 7:50 PM
Maybe you should call your congressman/woman and demand they sponsor legislation to lock up every woman who does an abortion.
HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 8:02 PM
Interesting comment by the lawyer.
Quickest would be choosing to avoid actions that tend toward becoming pregnant.
AesopFan on May 22, 2013 at 8:21 PM
Well said, and worth repeating:
ITguy on May 22, 2013 at 8:29 PM
Stanek to testify for nationwide 20-week abortion ban
Jill Stanek is the IL former nurse who also testified in IL when Obama was in the IL State Senate. Does he ever know who she is.
http://www.jillstanek.com/2008/02/links-to-barack-obamas-votes-on-illinois-born-alive-infant-protection-act/
She’s got courage. She’s never let up. I haven’t heard if she’s been audited, but the FBI did show up at the door of her daughter and son-in-law last summer.
http://www.jillstanek.com/2012/07/obama-administrations-harassment-of-pro-lifers-gets-personal/
INC on May 22, 2013 at 10:02 PM
Or we could just lock up the Gosnell-esque ghouls and go from there. If doing that resulted in a de facto end to legal abortion, I wouldn’t feel bad at all.
gryphon202 on May 22, 2013 at 10:03 PM
I’m sorry I had to go sit shiva tonight and was unable to perform my usual duty. Maybe someone else could take up the slack?
thuja on May 22, 2013 at 11:18 PM
Gosnell gave the left exactly what they wanted;
A woman’s right to an abortion anytime, for any reason.
If they tell you different, they are lying. And the lawyer is basically negotiating price… With the level horror being the currency.
These baby killers are just that vile and there is a special place for them…
RalphyBoy on May 22, 2013 at 11:24 PM
I usually like Megyn Kelly, but not in this interview. They guy’s trying to be calm and reasonable, and Kelly’s just killing him. What did she want the guy to say? “You’re right Megyn. My client’s a sleazeball, and he’s horrible, and he’s despicable.” Clearly, that wasn’t going to happen. So what was the point?
asc85 on May 22, 2013 at 11:26 PM
They won’t go lower than 20 weeks unless they can test for Down’s Syndrome earlier than that.
/sad but true
cptacek on May 23, 2013 at 12:27 AM