<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama to issue signing statement to object to Gitmo restrictions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: House Has the Power; Lacks the Will! Obama Flouts the Rule of Law &#124; Brown Pelican Society of Louisiana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-6037574</link>
		<dc:creator>House Has the Power; Lacks the Will! Obama Flouts the Rule of Law &#124; Brown Pelican Society of Louisiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-6037574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of signing statements, he has resorted to them. In that vein, he and his Justice Department have argued that congressional attempts to prohibit him from transferring alien enemy combatants into our [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of signing statements, he has resorted to them. In that vein, he and his Justice Department have argued that congressional attempts to prohibit him from transferring alien enemy combatants into our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama to add signing statement to defense authorization opposing McCain-Levin amendment &#124; HDFC Forex Card</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-5211348</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama to add signing statement to defense authorization opposing McCain-Levin amendment &#124; HDFC Forex Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-5211348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] not for the first time, either — and not even the first time for a defense authorization bill.  Under fire from civil libertarians on his left, Barack Obama will add a signing statement [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not for the first time, either — and not even the first time for a defense authorization bill.  Under fire from civil libertarians on his left, Barack Obama will add a signing statement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Issues “Signing Statement” Rejects De-funding “Czars” &#124; Suffolk County Liberty Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4493805</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Issues “Signing Statement” Rejects De-funding “Czars” &#124; Suffolk County Liberty Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 02:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4493805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to pay for it by ignoring their own funding strictures. He’s been using signing statements for a long time now, but I’m not sure there’s ever been an example this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to pay for it by ignoring their own funding strictures. He’s been using signing statements for a long time now, but I’m not sure there’s ever been an example this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broken Campaign Pledges</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4489919</link>
		<dc:creator>Broken Campaign Pledges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4489919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Obama:...&lt;/strong&gt;

...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama:&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novaculus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4203043</link>
		<dc:creator>novaculus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 22:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4203043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Comments that were left at another site? Why would HA want to do that?

Midas on January 4, 2011 at 1:56 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, I mean the comments left here at the headline link.  Sorry if I wasn&#039;t clear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Comments that were left at another site? Why would HA want to do that?</p>
<p>Midas on January 4, 2011 at 1:56 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>No, I mean the comments left here at the headline link.  Sorry if I wasn&#8217;t clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold Fury &#187; OBAMA SHREDS THE CONSTITUTION!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202713</link>
		<dc:creator>Cold Fury &#187; OBAMA SHREDS THE CONSTITUTION!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Via Ed, who notes a baffling subtext: As a candidate, Barack Obama repeatedly and vociferously objected to George Bush’s use of signing statements, almost as often as he objected to the existence of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility for captured terrorists&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Ed, who notes a baffling subtext: As a candidate, Barack Obama repeatedly and vociferously objected to George Bush’s use of signing statements, almost as often as he objected to the existence of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility for captured terrorists&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202654</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;President Obama may formally object to a provision that would prohibit the use of any funds to transfer detainees from the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay to the United States for any purpose.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Congress had better stand up to this tyrant in the WH. He means to seize powers from the legislative body and defy Constitutionally defined powers/authority as written in this founding document.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Does anyone remember the outrage in the MSM when President Nixon tried to &quot;impound&quot; funds voted by Congress to use them for a different purpose than Congress intended? How many of the lefty media would compare Obama to Nixon now?

Most people, and most Congress-critters, have a worse NIMBY complex for Gitmo terrorists than they would for a nuke plant on the San Andreas fault. Not even super-liberal (up)Chuck Schumer wanted KSM tried in New York City.

A little reminder to Barack Hitler Obama: The House of Representatives, from which all revenue-raising bills must originate, has a Republican majority. If Obama starts playing games with money voted by the new Congress, things could get really ugly. Cut off the money, starve the beast!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>President Obama may formally object to a provision that would prohibit the use of any funds to transfer detainees from the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay to the United States for any purpose.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Congress had better stand up to this tyrant in the WH. He means to seize powers from the legislative body and defy Constitutionally defined powers/authority as written in this founding document.</p></blockquote>
<p>Does anyone remember the outrage in the MSM when President Nixon tried to &#8220;impound&#8221; funds voted by Congress to use them for a different purpose than Congress intended? How many of the lefty media would compare Obama to Nixon now?</p>
<p>Most people, and most Congress-critters, have a worse NIMBY complex for Gitmo terrorists than they would for a nuke plant on the San Andreas fault. Not even super-liberal (up)Chuck Schumer wanted KSM tried in New York City.</p>
<p>A little reminder to Barack Hitler Obama: The House of Representatives, from which all revenue-raising bills must originate, has a Republican majority. If Obama starts playing games with money voted by the new Congress, things could get really ugly. Cut off the money, starve the beast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1-4-2011 &#124; Drive Time Happy Hour</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202634</link>
		<dc:creator>1-4-2011 &#124; Drive Time Happy Hour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Obama to issue signing statement to object to Gitmo restrictions? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama to issue signing statement to object to Gitmo restrictions? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profitsbeard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202589</link>
		<dc:creator>profitsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The Obama Doctrine&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;em&gt;lie to suckers to win power, and then weasel about everything to keep it&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Obama Doctrine</strong>: <em>lie to suckers to win power, and then weasel about everything to keep it</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebrokenrattle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202556</link>
		<dc:creator>thebrokenrattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[like he&#039;s actually going to close it down.... ha!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like he&#8217;s actually going to close it down&#8230;. ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midas</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202553</link>
		<dc:creator>Midas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Ed, why not just import comments whenever you promote a Headline?

novaculus on January 4, 2011 at 1:09 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Comments that were left at another site?  Why would HA want to do that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ed, why not just import comments whenever you promote a Headline?</p>
<p>novaculus on January 4, 2011 at 1:09 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Comments that were left at another site?  Why would HA want to do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capejasmine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202542</link>
		<dc:creator>capejasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Skandia Recluse on January 4, 2011 at 1:40 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well...he is a dictator in the making. I have no doubts all this skirting of congress, and laws, and ruling by executive orders, and regulation proves just that. This man is hell bent on being a dictator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Skandia Recluse on January 4, 2011 at 1:40 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well&#8230;he is a dictator in the making. I have no doubts all this skirting of congress, and laws, and ruling by executive orders, and regulation proves just that. This man is hell bent on being a dictator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjoco1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202540</link>
		<dc:creator>rjoco1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and if you like your health care plan you can keep it, and if you like your dr., you can keep your dr., and if we pass the health care bill it will reduce the deficit! The guy has no core, just a vacuum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and if you like your health care plan you can keep it, and if you like your dr., you can keep your dr., and if we pass the health care bill it will reduce the deficit! The guy has no core, just a vacuum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skandia Recluse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202511</link>
		<dc:creator>Skandia Recluse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Even with the signing statement, though, the White House says that Obama won’t tempt Congress by violating the provision. 
. . .
This is strictly a grandstanding measure,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Obama is raising a constitutional issue by claiming the authority to ignore legislation passed by congress.

The constitutional responsibilities of the president are to execute the laws that congress passes. A president who claims to &#039;object&#039; to a law that has been passed is setting up the position where he will next refuse to enforce law that he does not agree with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Even with the signing statement, though, the White House says that Obama won’t tempt Congress by violating the provision.<br />
. . .<br />
This is strictly a grandstanding measure,</p></blockquote>
<p>Obama is raising a constitutional issue by claiming the authority to ignore legislation passed by congress.</p>
<p>The constitutional responsibilities of the president are to execute the laws that congress passes. A president who claims to &#8216;object&#8217; to a law that has been passed is setting up the position where he will next refuse to enforce law that he does not agree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative in NOVA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202495</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative in NOVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often wonder how the conversation Obama has with his staff goes when he is thinking about making a decision contrary to a previous pledge, maybe something like this?  Obama:  &quot;I&#039;m thinking about [insert violation of a campaign pledge].&quot;  Staff member:  &quot;But sir, you said [insert his campaign pledge].&quot;  Obama:  &quot;So?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often wonder how the conversation Obama has with his staff goes when he is thinking about making a decision contrary to a previous pledge, maybe something like this?  Obama:  &#8220;I&#8217;m thinking about [insert violation of a campaign pledge].&#8221;  Staff member:  &#8220;But sir, you said [insert his campaign pledge].&#8221;  Obama:  &#8220;So?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capejasmine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202493</link>
		<dc:creator>capejasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me be clear....

When Bush did it, it was wrong.

When Obama does it, bow down and praise the messiah for being so smart, and so wise.

*Now I need a shower*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me be clear&#8230;.</p>
<p>When Bush did it, it was wrong.</p>
<p>When Obama does it, bow down and praise the messiah for being so smart, and so wise.</p>
<p>*Now I need a shower*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernGent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202486</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernGent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If you like your plan, you can keep your plan&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you like your plan, you can keep your plan&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajacksonian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202485</link>
		<dc:creator>ajacksonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poor old Constitutional Law Prof forgot about Art. I, Sec. 8 powers granted to Congress:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;&lt;/strong&gt;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

&lt;strong&gt;To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;&lt;/strong&gt;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

&lt;strong&gt;To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress&lt;/strong&gt;;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But then that takes this thing known as &#039;reading comprehension&#039;, which is something that is lacking from the Constitutional Law Prof.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poor old Constitutional Law Prof forgot about Art. I, Sec. 8 powers granted to Congress:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;</strong></p>
<p>To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;</p>
<p>To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;</p>
<p>To provide and maintain a Navy;</p>
<p><strong>To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;</strong></p>
<p>To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;</p>
<p><strong>To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress</strong>;</p></blockquote>
<p>But then that takes this thing known as &#8216;reading comprehension&#8217;, which is something that is lacking from the Constitutional Law Prof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202477</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;O/T: Per Breitbart, John Roberts of CNN is leaving for Fox News.

silvernana on January 4, 2011 at 1:09 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

HA had a Headlines thread on this story last night. Has been moved off the front page by now I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>O/T: Per Breitbart, John Roberts of CNN is leaving for Fox News.</p>
<p>silvernana on January 4, 2011 at 1:09 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>HA had a Headlines thread on this story last night. Has been moved off the front page by now I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202475</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The “Constitutional law professor”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bwahahaha.

Speaking of Harvard, last week I passed along the amusing story of Adam Wheeler, who faked his way into, and nearly faked his way thru, that esteemed institution. Puffington Host now has a fascinating take on this.

&lt;blockquote&gt;So, basically, America&#039;s best university, home to the future leaders of our good country, got punk&#039;d, for lack of a better phrase. By a 20-year-old. Adam Wheeler challenged the admissions gods and won.

According to Harvard&#039;s website, each application to the school is read by two or more members of their admissions committee, after which the files &quot;are considered very carefully in a series of committee meetings where a majority vote is required for admission.&quot; And yet. Wheeler flew in as a transfer student in 2007. And it wasn&#039;t as if he was hiding the holes in his story from Harvard&#039;s gatekeepers. He had authorized the admissions committee to corroborate his error-heavy application by requesting his (nonexistent) secondary school records. Evidently, they declined.

Sure, qualified students are accepted into Harvard each year, ones who presumably did not fabricate their accomplishments. But after the Wheeler fiasco, how can we be so sure?&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The “Constitutional law professor”</p></blockquote>
<p>Bwahahaha.</p>
<p>Speaking of Harvard, last week I passed along the amusing story of Adam Wheeler, who faked his way into, and nearly faked his way thru, that esteemed institution. Puffington Host now has a fascinating take on this.</p>
<blockquote><p>So, basically, America&#8217;s best university, home to the future leaders of our good country, got punk&#8217;d, for lack of a better phrase. By a 20-year-old. Adam Wheeler challenged the admissions gods and won.</p>
<p>According to Harvard&#8217;s website, each application to the school is read by two or more members of their admissions committee, after which the files &#8220;are considered very carefully in a series of committee meetings where a majority vote is required for admission.&#8221; And yet. Wheeler flew in as a transfer student in 2007. And it wasn&#8217;t as if he was hiding the holes in his story from Harvard&#8217;s gatekeepers. He had authorized the admissions committee to corroborate his error-heavy application by requesting his (nonexistent) secondary school records. Evidently, they declined.</p>
<p>Sure, qualified students are accepted into Harvard each year, ones who presumably did not fabricate their accomplishments. But after the Wheeler fiasco, how can we be so sure?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tru2tx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202464</link>
		<dc:creator>tru2tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was then.  This is now.  Chapter XXXXXXXXXXIX.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was then.  This is now.  Chapter XXXXXXXXXXIX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202455</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;This is strictly a grandstanding measure, one with a heaping helping of hypocrisy on top.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If Barry excels at anything, it&#039;s HYPOCRISY.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is strictly a grandstanding measure, one with a heaping helping of hypocrisy on top.</p></blockquote>
<p>If Barry excels at anything, it&#8217;s HYPOCRISY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J_Crater</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202446</link>
		<dc:creator>J_Crater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;As for the Signing Statement, each of these statements allows all to see whatever interpretation the Executive branch will apply to the law. The Signing Statements can impart no authority, but rather only represent a position of interpretation. Previously, these positions were understood within the Executive branch as internal policies that were unseen by the public and these positions were made public only when a statue was put up for judicial review or as regulations, stemming from these laws, were disclosed in the Federal Register.
The Signing Statements represent a level of transparency by the Executive branch. If all bills had a Signing Statement, we would all be better served.&lt;/i&gt;

The downside of a Signing Statement is that it removes the ability to flip-flop or in most cases even be flexible. It has the real effect of starting the judicial review process without even filing a suit, as it locks in many aspects of the Executive branch position.

While many will view a Signing Statement on the Defense Authorization bill as an &quot;evil&quot; act. It will be even more &quot;evil&quot; if there is no statement. The opponents of the Gitmo shutdown should be waiting with baited breath to see what clarifications the Executive branch considers important enough to put into a Signing Statement, as this is the minimal test they will have to clear to have the court consider any reversals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As for the Signing Statement, each of these statements allows all to see whatever interpretation the Executive branch will apply to the law. The Signing Statements can impart no authority, but rather only represent a position of interpretation. Previously, these positions were understood within the Executive branch as internal policies that were unseen by the public and these positions were made public only when a statue was put up for judicial review or as regulations, stemming from these laws, were disclosed in the Federal Register.<br />
The Signing Statements represent a level of transparency by the Executive branch. If all bills had a Signing Statement, we would all be better served.</i></p>
<p>The downside of a Signing Statement is that it removes the ability to flip-flop or in most cases even be flexible. It has the real effect of starting the judicial review process without even filing a suit, as it locks in many aspects of the Executive branch position.</p>
<p>While many will view a Signing Statement on the Defense Authorization bill as an &#8220;evil&#8221; act. It will be even more &#8220;evil&#8221; if there is no statement. The opponents of the Gitmo shutdown should be waiting with baited breath to see what clarifications the Executive branch considers important enough to put into a Signing Statement, as this is the minimal test they will have to clear to have the court consider any reversals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silvernana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202443</link>
		<dc:creator>silvernana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O/T:  Per Breitbart, John Roberts of CNN is leaving for Fox News.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O/T:  Per Breitbart, John Roberts of CNN is leaving for Fox News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novaculus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/04/obama-to-issue-signing-statement-to-object-to-gitmo-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-4202441</link>
		<dc:creator>novaculus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=122788#comment-4202441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the headlines comments:

&lt;blockquote&gt;So some of Dear Leader’s advisers think ignoring the law, passed with real bi-partisan support, that ties his hands on the Gitmo terrorists is a good idea. These morons may finally provide the vehicle that those opposed to signing statements have awaited: An act of defiance of Congressional authority so egregious that the whole process may be found to be unconstitutional.

I love the smell of napalm, uh, litigation, in the morning. Smells like victory.

novaculus on January 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ed, why not just import comments whenever you promote a Headline?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the headlines comments:</p>
<blockquote><p>So some of Dear Leader’s advisers think ignoring the law, passed with real bi-partisan support, that ties his hands on the Gitmo terrorists is a good idea. These morons may finally provide the vehicle that those opposed to signing statements have awaited: An act of defiance of Congressional authority so egregious that the whole process may be found to be unconstitutional.</p>
<p>I love the smell of napalm, uh, litigation, in the morning. Smells like victory.</p>
<p>novaculus on January 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ed, why not just import comments whenever you promote a Headline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>