End of the line for Steele?

posted at 10:55 am on January 3, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

The race for the chair of the RNC has been a wide-open affair, with a number of contenders for the spot now occupied by Michael Steele, including Steele himself.  The eventual winner needs a majority of the 168 members of the national committee, which means that no candidate can afford to have more than 83 members declare themselves opposed.  Unfortunately for Steele, Politico’s latest head count shows 88 RNC votes aligned against him no matter who opposes the current chair:

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele faces an all-but-impossible path to reelection this month, as a majority of the RNC’s 168 members indicate that they will not support the controversial chairman for another term.

A weeklong canvass of the party’s governing board by POLITICO revealed 88 members who have decided not to vote for Steele, either opting to support one of his opponents or simply ruling out Steele as a choice in the race.

Fifty-five members, some of whom have endorsed one of Steele’s challengers, have signaled that they will not support the chairman under any circumstances. An additional 33 pledged their support elsewhere.

Just as telling, not a single member of the committee said that Steele was their second choice in the race – a grave indicator in a contest likely to be decided in multiple ballots.

It’s not over yet, though.  Depending on whether Steele can survive the early rounds of voting, he may wind up benefiting from opposition to other candidates.  It wouldn’t be impossible, for instance, for a matchup between Maria Cino and Steele to get a few pro-life voters reconsidering, even with Cino’s defense of her pro-life record over the last few days.  The 55 who are adamant Anybody But Steele voters don’t make a completely insurmountable obstacle to Steele’s ambitions.

However, they do make it difficult, and as Politico notes, the lack of Steele as a fallback candidate for most of the others would appear to seal his fate.  Cino is at the moment a second-tier candidate herself.  Wisconsin party chair Reince Priebus has the most votes in Politico’s survey with 32 publicly announced endorsements, followed by Missouri chair Ann Wagner with 13.  Both have long track records of organizing and fundraising, the two areas in which Steele disappointed in the last two years.  Over fifty voting members declined to comment or failed to respond to the straw poll conducted by Politico, which means there may be even more voters completely opposed to Steele’s return.

One other factor will play against Steele in this election, which is the insider track the race has taken.  We aren’t seeing marquee candidates, like former governors or presidential candidates.  The RNC seems very focused on finding people with actual competencies in the core responsibilities of the job — fundraising and organizing — as the party prepares for a huge election cycle in 2012.   The voting members seem to have lost their taste for media personalities and glib talk-show appearances after living through Steele’s tenure in the top job.  That has made the chair election a lot less interesting in terms of breathless media updates, but underscores the seriousness of the GOP’s approach to the position this time around.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I hope he’s gone.

ladyingray on January 3, 2011 at 10:58 AM

Conservatives have wised up; we now send money directly to candidates and PACs. That will not change, no matter who is RNC chair.

pugwriter on January 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM

Good riddance. I initially thought Steele would be a good spokesperson on the circuit. Instead he fumbled the ball so many times it was an embarrassment.

ButterflyDragon on January 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM

Steele has a backup plan, he can be a sidekick on Hughley’s barely-watched talk show, they can trade jokes about all the white Nazi’s on the right.

Bishop on January 3, 2011 at 11:01 AM

Conservatives have wised up; we now send money directly to candidates and PACs. That will not change, no matter who is RNC chair.

pugwriter on January 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM

my thoughts exactly….

cmsinaz on January 3, 2011 at 11:02 AM

The race for the chair of the RNC

Subliminal racism.

Akzed on January 3, 2011 at 11:03 AM

raise money
fund candidates
stay out of debt

How has steele done on those objectives? Not well.

ted c on January 3, 2011 at 11:05 AM

I have a . HA clue: You know who this helps?

kingsjester on January 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM

I have a . HA clue: You know who this helps?

kingsjester on January 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM

you’re bad./

ted c on January 3, 2011 at 11:09 AM

Yeah, but he’s the perfect candidate for this job, anyway.

kingsjester on January 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM

kingsjester on January 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM

nice piece KJ….

lyle waggoner, heh, forgot about him

cmsinaz on January 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM

kingsjester on January 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM

agree, if they are that much in the hole

cmsinaz on January 3, 2011 at 11:11 AM

cmsinaz on January 3, 2011 at 11:11 AM

Thanks. After all, he has a great financial mind…

kingsjester on January 3, 2011 at 11:13 AM

During the campaign I was getting calls from the RNCC (for House campaigns), and I finally asked them to take me off of their phone list.

Ward Cleaver on January 3, 2011 at 11:14 AM

I’d still take Steele over Cino.

Rocks on January 3, 2011 at 11:15 AM

Really, who cares?

Aquateen Hungerforce on January 3, 2011 at 11:16 AM

Just GTFO already.

RarestRX on January 3, 2011 at 11:17 AM

He’ll win.

rrpjr on January 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM

Conservatives have wised up; we now send money directly to candidates and PACs. That will not change, no matter who is RNC chair.
pugwriter on January 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM

THIS

Those morons who are our “ruling elite” RINOS at the national level still don’t get it. I will NEVER contribute to the RNC, or the congress critter election committees again because of their CHRONIC choices to support RINO candidates at the primary level. Screw them. I, too, am only sending my campaign bucks to the fiscal conservative candidates who are also constitutionalists. No more RINOS, no more squishys, and no more grahamnesty kind of candidates. DONE.

karenhasfreedom on January 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM

I just off the phone from someone at the RNC that was soliciting a donation. I told the caller “I will contribute another penny until Steele is gone and the RINO’s are abused for their lame duck votes”.

David in ATL on January 3, 2011 at 11:23 AM

In other entertainment news, the runaway movie hit is “Avatar,” a futuristic epic about humans who travel to an alien planet to mine a precious mineral that they believe will give them the power to emit believable dialogue.

We spent the year with a Congress and Administration also on a quest for “Unobtainium.” If it weren’t so expensive, the similarities would be laughable.

J_Crater on January 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM

Steele would be better than Reince Priebus or Cino, and I hate Steele. Priebus’ law firm supports obamacare and Cino was a damned obamacare lobbyist.

I would prefer Anuzis over any of the other candidates.

MFn G I M P on January 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM

Steele should realize this is an in party decision and election and not treat it like a general election where you can be controversial with the people who are admantly against your re-election. Steele should step aside. Why does he need to drag everybody into a fight over his leadership?

Conan on January 3, 2011 at 11:31 AM

The Republican Party is supposed to be a vehicle for the advancement of conservative principles and candidates, nothing more. Unfortunately, like church leaders who obsess over church buildings and man-made institutions, GOP leadership has largely forgotten its first love. For Republicans, that first love (politically speaking)is supposed to be conservatism.

pugwriter on January 3, 2011 at 11:40 AM

The RNC and the Chair of it need to find wallets closed to them and that people will donate directly to candidates. The top-down form of politics is ending, and no matter how much money is raised at the highest level, it is not in the service of good candidates but the Party and those who control it.

To get a better party you need candidates that reflect the membership, and that is still not happening at the highest level. Therefore the highest level needs to find out that they are functionaries to the new way of doing things: figureheads of a bygone era of politics. The new era is a bottom-up one, that is cross-networked between individuals and candidates via local organizations. Until the RNC realizes that it is to reflect its membership, stop being partisan about who it supports and keeps itself accountable to its membership for every dime spent it will fade into the background and no amount of charisma will make it relevent to anyone. Do the simple jobs you are tasked to do, or find out people don’t want to pay you for the stuff you aren’t asked to do in their name.

ajacksonian on January 3, 2011 at 11:54 AM

Steele should step aside. Why does he need to drag everybody into a fight over his leadership?

Conan on January 3, 2011 at 11:31 AM

This is what narcissists do.

baldilocks on January 3, 2011 at 12:06 PM

The RNC lost its bona fides in 2008 and 2010…more concerned with the status quo that even considering what most Americans on the Right were seeking.

Give to the candidate of your choice…directly. Make it personal. Keep it personal. In time, the RNC will go the way of the Whigs.

coldwarrior on January 3, 2011 at 12:13 PM

Why do we need a national party organization? What value does it add? Don’t the state parties handle the primaries & ballots & such?

OhioCoastie on January 3, 2011 at 12:25 PM

Conservatives have wised up; we now send money directly to candidates and PACs. That will not change, no matter who is RNC chair.

pugwriter on January 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM

my thoughts exactly….

cmsinaz on January 3, 2011 at 11:02 AM
Correct Gentlemen.
Been doing this since before the last election.Direct to the candidates of our choice, no skim for Cornan and steel,sent $$ to lots of states..Barry’s use of the net taught us all how to run a modern funding operation,now the RNC is irrelevant.

Col.John Wm. Reed on January 3, 2011 at 12:28 PM

I too will not donate to the RNC, CA RNC, NRSC or NRCC… I donate to SarahPac and directly to conservative or genuine TEA Party candidates.

Steele mismanaged the job but I think Romney has the perfect skill set for it…

CCRWM on January 3, 2011 at 12:30 PM

“There aren’t really 88 of them, they just call themselves the Crazy 88″

flytier on January 3, 2011 at 12:30 PM

Why do we need a national party organization? What value does it add? Don’t the state parties handle the primaries & ballots & such?

OhioCoastie on January 3, 2011 at 12:25 PM

The national party helps make sure that “electable” people like Specter, Graham, Castle, and Crist are nominated.

AZfederalist on January 3, 2011 at 12:34 PM

The national party helps make sure that “electable” people like Specter, Graham, Castle, and Crist are nominated.

Arrgh, botched the quote function

AZfederalist on January 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM

I too, supported Steele back when he was running the first time. I really thought he had his thumb on the pulse of what was needed…and what needed to be done.

He has been less than stellar however. I still like him personally, such as it is. But he’s not cut out for this line of work. He’s done more damage to the party, then was there before, and gone along with the good ol boy establishment crap.

The sooner the party realizes the anger is not just against Democrats, but all politicians who seem to feel it’s their right to be in D.C., and not a privilege as an elected official sent to work FOR the people….the better off they’ll be.

capejasmine on January 3, 2011 at 12:42 PM

WHAT UP

antisocial on January 3, 2011 at 12:43 PM

Steele’s problem is that he thinks his job is to represent the Republican Party on the national media, when that’s not at all his role. He should be a behind-the-scenes organizer, as past chairs have been.

Perhaps someone needs to do a written job description.

slickwillie2001 on January 3, 2011 at 12:54 PM

Steele’s problem is that he thinks his job is to represent the Republican Party on the national media, when that’s not at all his role. He should be a behind-the-scenes organizer, as past chairs have been.

Romney’s problem is that he thinks his job is to represent the Republican Party on the national media, when that’s not at all his role. He should be a behind-the-scenes organizer, as past chairs have been. ”

FIFY.

IOW, Romney thinks he should rep the Repubs in 2012 … even though he has been nothing but a behind-the-scenes organizer – for himself – for the past 2 years.

Somebody please start a “Romney for RNC Chair” movement. He’s perfect!

hrh40 on January 3, 2011 at 1:00 PM

IOW, Romney thinks he should rep the Repubs in 2012 … even though he has been nothing but a behind-the-scenes organizer – for himself – for the past 2 years.

Somebody please start a “Romney for RNC Chair” movement. He’s perfect!

hrh40 on January 3, 2011 at 1:00 PM

Romney should NOT be the RNC chair for one huge reason–he signed Romneycare as MA Governor before ObamaCare became extremely unpopular.

The RNC chair’s main job is fundraising and recruiting candidates, but part of his job is explaining the Republican message to the public via the media.

There were two main reasons why Republicans won the House in 2010–opposition to high spending and taxes, and opposition to ObamaCare. If Romney becomes RNC chair, the message becomes muddled, and he’s bound to get some embarrassing questions about RomneyCare, and one of the best reasons for voting Republican in 2012 (repealing ObamaCare) goes out the window.

Steve Z on January 3, 2011 at 1:53 PM

I didn’t know Ed was a Tarantino fan!

Steele-Meh, whatever. I used to work for the RNC, there have been good, bad and ugly, so no real biggie. Ken Mehlman and Haley Barbour were my faves.

di butler on January 3, 2011 at 2:04 PM

I don’t care if they wheel out Zombie Reagan to replace Steele, I wouldn’t send a dime to the RNC. Sarah PAC gets my $$ contributions. RNC is dead, they just don’t know it yet.

james23 on January 3, 2011 at 2:31 PM

The next RNC Chair needs to be someone who can get a large GOTV campaign going and draw in millions of volunteers to work on that. Fund raising really doesn’t matter, a few well placed money bombs on Glenn Beck’s show will get people all the money they need over the internet.

cadams on January 3, 2011 at 3:29 PM