Senate to block Guantanamo transfers as well
posted at 10:55 am on December 15, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Last week, House Democrats on the Appropriations Committee inserted a codicil into next year’s spending plan to prohibit federal funds to be used for the purpose of transferring detainees at Guantanamo Bay to the US for any purpose during FY2011. Whether this came as a slap from progressives angered over Barack Obama’s tax deal or from moderates angered at the response from progressives to it, the move certainly caught the attention of the White House. Eric Holder decried it as an unprecedented intrusion on executive authority and demanded its removal, apparently unaware of the Constitution and the House’s “power of the purse” to check the executive branch’s overreach.
Now the Senate has followed suit and included the same ban in its version of FY2011 funding:
The Senate is moving to block President Barack Obama from transferring Guantanamo Bay prisoners to the United States.
An unreleased draft of a bill expected to pass this month essentially puts a nine-month hold on Guantanamo transfers. That includes Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, who had been slotted for trial in New York before Obama bowed to political resistance and blocked the Justice Department’s plans.
The AP can’t resist adding an editorial comment at the end:
It already looked as if, in the decade after 9/11, no one would face trial for the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil. The Senate bill would make that a near certainty.
That decision has nothing to do with this defunding of detainee transfers. Congress has repeatedly authorized military commissions to adjudicate the 9/11 terrorists as well as other detainees captured abroad by military and intelligence assets during a time of war. This not only follows the precedents set over the entirety of our national history, it provides more safeguards and routes of appeal than we have allowed in any other commission system. Even the Obama administration apparently agrees, as it is processing some of Gitmo’s detainees through that system.
That seems to be one of the reasons that Congress is now stripping the executive branch of funds to move detainees to federal courts. The Obama administration has acted in defiance of multiple efforts by Congress — including a Democratic-led Congress — to establish the military commissions as the court of jurisdiction for terrorists captured outside the US by military and intelligence units. Elected officials from both parties have objected to trying these terrorists in federal court, especially in New York, where Denocrats like Senator Chuck Schumer and Governor Andrew Cuomo both demanded that Obama cancel the trial in Manhattan. On top of that, Holder’s DoJ suffered an embarrassing verdict in the Ahmed Ghailani trial in which the terrorist defendant won acquittals on all but one conspiracy charge after the presiding judge barred an important witness due to Ghailani’s interrogation by intelligence assets.
It seems we have reached consensus on the notion of civilian-court trials for Gitmo detainees — and the Obama White House is outside of it.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Count it!
Del Dolemonte on December 15, 2010 at 11:00 AM
SSDD from DOJ
ted c on December 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM
I have to admit, this part of the bill makes all the other crap almost worth it.
ORconservative on December 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM
Fierce moral urgency!
Bishop on December 15, 2010 at 11:04 AM
Related parody: Foreign Terrorists Win Citizens’ Right to Federal Court Trial After Targeting Their 3,000th Civilian
Mervis Winter on December 15, 2010 at 11:06 AM
Almost two years since Obama “closed” Guantanamo Bay detention facilities and a similarly long time since Holder stated for the record that there’d be no problem at all getting solid convictions of any and all detainees in a federal court.
I’m starting to lose my sense of hopeychangeyness about these guys.
I am soooo disappointed.
I truly thought they knew so much more than the rest of us. I truly thought they’d have this one solved a long long time ago.
Sooo disappointed….baffles the mind, it does.
coldwarrior on December 15, 2010 at 11:07 AM
Sounds like your stockpile supply of Hopium has officially run out.
pilamaye on December 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM
Well it saves the embarrassment of listening to them state that they are following the dictates of Islam and then have America stand on it’s head to ignore and whitewash their testimony.
BL@KBIRD on December 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM
They can’t stop Obama from taking AF-1 down there and personally transporting those detainees to American soil.
Which I fully expect to be his next move.
….oh and on the way back they can buzz lower Manhattan again. I’m sure KSM could use a lift in his spirits.
Mord on December 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Where’s crr6 to comment on the unconstitutionality of this?
ladyingray on December 15, 2010 at 11:21 AM
I know you’re being sarcastic, but on a serious note, using AF1 to bring the detainees to U.S. soil would most certainly violate the ban. AF1 is funded with federal taxpayer dollars.
His next move: Have a friendly state pay for the move, then reimburse the state through the use of infrastructure projects suddenly federally funded.
amerpundit on December 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM
Itsa ‘sweetener’ to get the GOP to sign on, because :
The GOP leadership still doesn’t understand the game.
Skandia Recluse on December 15, 2010 at 11:26 AM
The reason there haven’t been trials of the 9/11 perps is because of AP’s leftist buddies who spent the last decade trying to ban military commissions and trials (under the most protective rules for our enemies ever enacted by our government)of their terror pals. You can’t blame the government for the delays. I am thankful, though that the ban may be enacted in one form or another (but am not willing to allow a 1.1 Trillion Dollar spending bill to pass to do so).
eaglewingz08 on December 15, 2010 at 11:40 AM
KSM, among others, was already on trial at Gitmo when Barack Obama took office and one of the first things he did was halt those trials for “review”.
The AP lies.
Pablo on December 15, 2010 at 11:57 AM
They can’t use AF1, but Zsa-Zsa or some other rich loony liberal can use their fleet of private planes to make the transfer.
slickwillie2001 on December 15, 2010 at 12:18 PM
Inherent in all of this is liberals’ contempt for military tribunals, which is contempt of the military in general.
John the Libertarian on December 15, 2010 at 12:31 PM
dmann on December 15, 2010 at 12:46 PM
I know liberals love the word “tolerance” but I’m sick of tolerating their crap.
They spend 3 years drumming up resentment against Bush for Guantanamo Bay, make it an issue in the presidential primaries and campaign (at that time only Romney had the guts to say he would double Guantanamo’s size) only to have their own hypocritical congress pull the rug out from under Obama now.
scotash on December 15, 2010 at 3:51 PM