Palin rejects Tea Party Nation idea of running for RNC chair

I think so too. She can afford to announce later than most, but I think she will end up doing it.

Brian1972 on December 6, 2010 at 6:26 PM

which is I think the reason huck had been talking about running too. He is trying to get her to announce early and gauge her support once she enters the race.

He has lost weight so i think huck is thinking about it but like allah says huck is worried about funding. If Palin enters the race most of Huck’s grassroots funding will dry up.

unseen on December 6, 2010 at 6:30 PM

President Obama noticed the election returns and is trying to appear more moderate, while radicals help by criticizing him a bit from the Left.

In his first Thanksgiving Proclamation, President Obama left out God. No surprise from a fellow who privately told supporters that economically challenged Americans cling to God (and guns) out of bitterness and leaves out a reference to “the Creator” when he mentions those “inalienable rights” proclaimed in America’s Declaration of Independence.

But, President Obama still wants to be re-elected after taking a shellacking in the 2010 election, so last month…GOD MADE A COMEBACK IN THE ANNUAL PRESIDENTIAL THANKSGIVING PROCLAMATION!

That’s not enough, of course. The Obama magic stopped working. Most Americans do — or soon will — realize that “progressives” like President Obama are secular extremists and, as such, are not representative of America.

So ACORN apologist Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, a failed Democrat gubernatorial candidate, just wrote an article for the Washington Post titled “Sarah Palin is wrong about John F. Kennedy, religion and politics” (www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/03/AR2010120303209_2.html?sid=ST2010120305853).

Team Obama is taking Palin seriously, and thus a female Kennedy is targeting Palin.

KKT waited until the second sentence to note that she is a niece of the late President John F. Kennedy and then proceeded to castigate Palin for sharing her views on JFK’s 1960 speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association.

Praise would be welcome, but not criticism.

In her latest book Palin praised Mitt Romney for his speech on government and religion during the last presidential campaign.

Palin and Romney believe that religious values properly inform public policy and freedom of religion is not freedom from religion.

They are right.

Palin had the temerity to blow the whistle on the public school indoctrination to which she was subjected on the JFK speech.

KKT put it this way: “Palin writes that when she was growing up, she was taught that Kennedy’s speech had ‘succeeded in the best possible way: It reconciled public service and religion without compromising either.’ Now, however, she says she has revisited the speech and changed her mind. She finds it ‘defensive . . . in tone and content’ and is upset that Kennedy, rather than presenting a reconciliation of his private faith and his public role, had instead offered an ‘unequivocal divorce of the two.’”

Palin is right. The Constitution was intended to provide for institutional separation of church and state, not to mandate governmental neutrality between religion and irreligion.

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/gaynor/101206

unseen on December 6, 2010 at 6:59 PM

But … but … but … what about Christine O’Donnell!1!!!1!!1!!11!!11!!!1!

darwin on December 6, 2010 at 6:54 PM

she did her job. she stopped the marxist from winning the seat. she exposed the lying sucking pond scum in the RINO establishment for all to see. I’m just sad she couldn’t stop both marxists in the end..

unseen on December 6, 2010 at 7:03 PM