Republicans now outnumber Democrats: Rasmussen
posted at 2:55 pm on December 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
I’m certain that as soon as media pollsters such as those who produce polls for Newsweek, the Washington Post and ABC, CBS, and NBC and the Wall Street Journal get this news, they will insist on samples that show a slight Republican edge among registered voters … right? Right? Anyone? Bueller?
In November, 36.0% of American Adults identified themselves as Republicans; 34.7% considered themselves Democrats, and 29.3% were not affiliated with either major party. That’s the largest number of Republicans since February 2005 and the first time ever that Rasmussen Reports polling has found more people identifying as Republicans than Democrats. …
In November 2008, following the presidential election, Democrats held a 7.6 percentage point advantage over the GOP. That means Republicans have picked up a net of approximately nine points over the past two years. That is a somewhat larger gain compared to the Democratic gains from the reelection of President Bush in 2004 to the Democratic takeover of Congress in 2006. However, it is similar to the gains recorded by Democrats during the four-year period from Election 2004 to Election 2008.
In each of the recent election cycles, the victorious party has gained in net partisan identification over the course of the election year.
Rasmussen also offers a buzz-kill warning:
It is worth noting, however, that the gains are often short-lived. Following Election 2004, the Republican partisan decline began in February 2005. In 2006, the Democratic edge began to decline as soon as they actually took control of Congress in January. Following President Obama’s victory in November 2008, the Democrat’s advantage in partisan identification peaked in December before declining.
Another point worth noting is that the GOP has the edge today partly because the number of Democrats is barely above the lowest level ever recorded in eight years of monthly tracking by Rasmussen Reports.
It’s hardly a secret that the wave in the midterms didn’t correspond to any large increase in popularity for Republicans. The leadership of the House Republican caucus has been cognizant of this reality ever since the election as well. Voters may have slightly increased their inclination to identify as Republicans, but still haven’t gone so far as to trust the GOP. All the Republicans got in November was a new opportunity to earn some loyalty after dissipating it in 2006 through a shower of pork, big-government spending, and scandal. If the GOP doesn’t make good on that opportunity, those numbers will reverse themselves soon.
Still, the new survey shows that media polls with double-digit gaps in partisan identification in the sample are completely laughable. Will we continue to see such sampling from the media outlets mentioned above after this report and a series of Gallup surveys showing a similar dead heat between the two parties? If so, that will attest to the purpose and intent of the media and their pollsters.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
“We weren’t always a one-party system, class. Once upon a time there was this thing called the Democrat Party…”
Akzed on December 1, 2010 at 2:58 PM
I wonder why this hasn’t happened before. Conservatives always vastly outnumber liberals.
itsnotaboutme on December 1, 2010 at 2:59 PM
A National Socialist Democrat with an (R) after their name is still a democrat.
Skandia Recluse on December 1, 2010 at 3:00 PM
Noooooooooooo
/Democrats
Good Lt on December 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM
..meanwhile, Pelosi, Reid, and Obama fight to push the stick forward on the Dem’s aircraft to pull it out it’s massive power-dive.
The War Planner on December 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM
I beg to differ.
The Dems are done.
They are the walking dead and don’t know it yet.
The GOP is the party of the people, at least people with functioning brains, and will continually be honed and fine-tuned in primaries until it is something that would have made Barry Goldwater proud (in 1964).
It’ll take twenty years, but the ride has begun.
Akzed on December 1, 2010 at 3:02 PM
Um…translated, your statement reads “a Nazi Democrat with an (R) next to their name is still a democrat.”
Democrats are not National Socialists, and neither are moderate Republicans.
Good Lt on December 1, 2010 at 3:03 PM
The Republican party is not a conservative party. I would land in the “not affiliated” segment myself.
NotCoach on December 1, 2010 at 3:04 PM
I think they are more RINO then anything.
upinak on December 1, 2010 at 3:05 PM
The best part of this is that the dems are concentrated in about 10 states. I feel sorry for all you folks in CA, but do your best to keep all the zombies within your borders.
TimTebowSavesAmerica on December 1, 2010 at 3:08 PM
1932: The Republicans are finished!
1952: The Democrats are finished!
1964: The Republicans are finished!
1972: The Democrats are finished!
1976: The Republicans are finished!
1980: The Democrats are finished!
1986: The Republicans are finished!
1994: The Democrats are finished!
1996: The Republicans are finished!
2004: The Democrats are finished!
2008: The Republicans are finished!
2010: The Democrats are finished!
See any pattern?
AngusMc on December 1, 2010 at 3:12 PM
Oh, come now. The GOP will find a way to mess it up.
DrMagnolias on December 1, 2010 at 3:12 PM
I thought I read articles after the midterm elections that claimed Rasmussen had oversampled Republicans or something?
El_Terrible on December 1, 2010 at 3:14 PM
wrong.
sesquipedalian on December 1, 2010 at 3:15 PM
It’s up to the elected Republicans to actually do something.
Will they figure it out? Unknown. if not we dispose of those that don’t.
tarpon on December 1, 2010 at 3:18 PM
1856: The Whigs are finished!
NotCoach on December 1, 2010 at 3:19 PM
Rasmussen should immediately repeat that survey including cell phones, and if there is a bias they need to adjust for it or include cell phones in their surveys. Having sunshine blown up your ass may feel good but it is not helpful.
motionview on December 1, 2010 at 3:21 PM
I wonder if Rasmussen has corrected the distortions caused by failure to poll cellphone-only voters in his polls.
Doodad Pro on December 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM
Ed ypu mean, you didn’t know? “…that will attest to the purpose and intent of the media and their pollsters.”
tarpon on December 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM
Yes. This.
Conservatives have only just started to wake up, and we’re pouring our second cup of coffee.
John the Libertarian on December 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM
heh, this is pretty funny. Transient, but funny.
ted c on December 1, 2010 at 3:28 PM
Pattern: Both parties are finished! Except when they’re not!
:-)
Good Lt on December 1, 2010 at 3:31 PM
The fact that the Democrats retained their current Congressional leadership and that the president plans only a Potemkin Village of triangulation, because he quivers in fear of the people who kept that Congressional leadership, should make things easier for Republicans. If the stick to their principles and make their case to the public, the people making the case against them will be the same faces that turned off voters five weeks ago (let alone the fact that by not controlling the Senate, the Republicans really don’t have to compromise on their principles, because it’s not going to be seen as a replay of Congress vs. President, as with Clinton in 1995-96; it’s going to be Obama-and-Senate Democrats vs. House Republicans, with the wackadoodle liberal-batshirt crazy version of Norma Desmond serving as the voice of the minority Dems in the House).
jon1979 on December 1, 2010 at 3:33 PM
Political parties are finished in even numbered years.
Jimbo3 on December 1, 2010 at 3:42 PM
Ja, that was too much. Thanks for the feed back.
Skandia Recluse on December 1, 2010 at 3:43 PM
The GOP is the more conservative party by a mile.
We use the acronym “RINO” because moderate Republicans don’t act like Republicans.
The most liberal Republicans in Congress are more conservative than almost all Democrats in Congress.
itsnotaboutme on December 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM
Keep in mind that figures reported in this article are for all adults, not likely voters. Republicans are a bit more likely to participate in elections than Democrats.
You might want to correct the summary headline in the headline box. This survey was not of likely voters.
Jimbo3 on December 1, 2010 at 3:45 PM
Too often my vote is between the lesser of two evils and currently the lesser evil is always the Republican. But I am still not a Republican.
NotCoach on December 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM
Have you talked to any college or high school aged kids lately? The little ‘enlightened’ idiots still think Obama is awesome! Dems are only ‘done’ if we take control of ‘education’ ie. indoctrination, away from the leftists. That, and conservatives actually put conservatism into action. Otherwise, we are doomed.
pannw on December 1, 2010 at 3:54 PM
Now they’re certainly socialists, on the other hand.
Just now National Socialist :-)
Good Lt on December 1, 2010 at 3:59 PM
PIMF
Good Lt on December 1, 2010 at 4:00 PM
Just not National Socialist.
Yeah, they’re LOCAL Socialists … until they hit the NATIONAL level.
Tony737 on December 1, 2010 at 4:20 PM
This seems like an appropriate place for a “Count It!”
Good Solid B-Plus on December 1, 2010 at 4:24 PM
I read somewhere yesterday that James Carville said Obama would have no problem getting re-elected. Is this the same brilliant guy who said Dems would be in power for the next 40 years? Why should we ever again take anything he says seriously?
silvernana on December 1, 2010 at 4:26 PM
This is especially funny because Rasmussen Reports™ says, now for the first time evah, quite unexpectedly, there are now more self-described Republicans than Democrats.
J_Crater on December 1, 2010 at 4:37 PM
I agree with this statement 100%. It boggles my mind that ANY Republican could think of voting for Obama if Romney isn’t the Republican nominee in 2012. My head almost exploded when I saw that headline.
Callie C. on December 1, 2010 at 4:40 PM
Yeah, the dates are getting closer together. Probably why “unaffiliated” keeps growing. Maybe both parties will be finished if they keep it up.
forest on December 1, 2010 at 5:00 PM
As long as the Republicans keep their platform of social conservatism, economic conservatism, and strong defense they will be in stellar shape.
Keep winning rural areas, and a lot of suburbs, and it will take a lot to keep the Republicans from controlling Congress in most normal years.
People were saying the party was finished just two years ago, and it has already bounced back, and is in good position to take the Senate, and perhaps the WH in 2012.
therightwinger on December 1, 2010 at 5:40 PM
There may be some truth to this. If we compare the Republican margin (%R – %D) in the last Rasmussen poll to actual election results for the 35 Senate races in 2010, Rasmussen over-predicted the Republican margin in 24 races, under-predicted it in only 11 races (all Republican wins by double-digits).
In 6 Senate races where the last Rasmussen poll showed the Republican ahead by less than 5%, Democrats won 3 of them (CO, WA, NV), Murkowski (write-in Republican) won another, and the Republican nominee won two others by 2% (PA and IL), less than the margin predicted by Rasmussen.
In 13 Senate races won by Democrats (excluding Hawaii, where Rasmussen’s last poll was 40 points off), Rasmussen under-predicted the Democrat margin by an average of 6%.
Most of us conservatives here at HotAir like to quote Rasmussen polls, because they usually give better numbers for Republicans than other polling outfits. But is Rasmussen TOO optimistic? Is there something in Rasmussen’s sampling method that favors Republicans relative to actual election results, or did late deciders (after Rasmussen’s last polls) swing to the Democrats? Does a Republican need a 6% lead in a Rasmussen poll to actually win an election?
Steve Z on December 1, 2010 at 5:54 PM
Exactly. Republicans in Congress have to try to do what they said they would do. If they don’t succeed because of Democrat obstruction in the Senate or the White House, Republicans need to explain clearly and often to the voters WHY their proposals would work better than those of the Democrats, and blame the Democrats for gridlock.
Steve Z on December 1, 2010 at 6:00 PM
Go figure!
GarandFan on December 1, 2010 at 6:26 PM
Rasmussen by itself is not a good indicator. Their polls skew right.
rjl1999 on December 1, 2010 at 7:01 PM
I was going to make a similar post. Many o fmy Conservative friends used to be registered Republicans but are now unaffiliated. I’d venture that the increases in Independents over the past few years is a combination of Conservatives eschewing any direct link to the Republican Party, along with disaffected life long Democrats who can’t support what the Dems have become but would never label themselves as Republicans.
Red State State of Mind on December 1, 2010 at 7:17 PM
I believe the data you are referencing is accurate. But what may be the factor in the recent elections is a strong surge of DEMs motivated by their GOTV efforts.
Has Rasmussen consistently over predicted Republicand #s or was this recent election a one off?
Red State State of Mind on December 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM
Just like in 2008 right?
CWforFreedom on December 1, 2010 at 7:47 PM
Rasmussen by itself is not a good indicator. Their polls skew right.
rjl1999 on December 1, 2010 at 7:01 PM
Just like in 2008 right?
CWforFreedom on December 1, 2010 at 7:47 PM
No. Like 2010.
“On Tuesday, polls conducted by the firm Rasmussen Reports — which released more than 100 surveys in the final three weeks of the campaign, including some commissioned under a subsidiary on behalf of Fox News — badly missed the margin in many states, and also exhibited a considerable bias toward Republican candidates.”
Nate Silver
rjl1999 on December 1, 2010 at 8:04 PM
Well, last year I changed my registration from Independent to Republican, not because I wanted to identify myself, but because the Democratic Party has left me no choice. I may not be interested in Politics, but the G**-d***** meddling politicians are interested in destroying my life, my country, and everything good in Western governance.
Carthago delenda est.
njcommuter on December 1, 2010 at 8:52 PM
Rasmussen’s cred suffered big time with his 2010 election predictions.
olesparkie on December 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM