New GM ad: Hey, thanks for that taxpayer bailout, America
posted at 11:30 am on November 26, 2010 by Allahpundit
If they’re willing to sink to this level of manipulative schmaltz now, I can’t wait to see what the thank-you ads will look like after their next bailout in a few years. A newborn foal struggling to walk for the first time? A kitten trying to climb a tree, falling adorably on its bottom the first few tries before scrambling triumphantly up to a limb? In fact, they could go ahead and make another thank-you spot right away: On top of the bailout funds, they’re getting a gigantic tax break due to TARP rules that will let them carry forward losses notwithstanding their recent change in ownership. For that ad, how about a cello sonata and footage of a cuddly baby piglet with its nose buried in the trough?
The occasion for this spot is last week’s IPO, which wasn’t quite the Popeye-eating-spinach moment as this vid might lead you to believe. For one thing, they’re still not remotely close to paying back all the money they owe: According to ProPublica, GM itself is still on the hook for close to $30 billion while GMAC owes close to $15 billion more on top of that. Mickey Kaus, meanwhile, offers upwards of a dozen reasons to believe, per the boxing analogy in the clip and despite The One’s insistence, that GM hasn’t yet gotten up off the mat and might not be getting up anytime soon. And not surprisingly, thanks to Obama’s largesse towards the UAW in brokering the initial bailout deal, it turns out that the union ended up being the big winner from the IPO, recouping $3.4 billion from share sales and positioning itself to break even if GM shares rise modestly. By comparison, share prices would have to soar for the feds to get back to zero, and as for longstanding GM investors, well…
Perhaps the biggest losers are the investors in the old GM. None of the bankrupt company’s previous stockholders got any money, while the claims of thousands of investors who purchased the company’s bonds are still being kicked around in a Manhattan bankruptcy court.
“It gives outraged flashbacks to the old GM bondholders,” who remain mired in the bankruptcy proceedings and are unlikely to recover more than 30 percent of their investments, Mr. Reynolds said…
Craig Coffey, a retiree in Nevada who invested $55,000 in bonds in the old GM that are now worthless, was outraged that the union is on its way to recovering all its money before investors get even a cent of compensation.
“We just sat and watched [the stock offering]. We got nothing,” he said. “Screwed again.”
Lighten up, pal. You did get something. You got a bailout ad with clips from “Animal House” in it.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Chris Tucker would be better casting.
slickwillie2001 on November 26, 2010 at 10:18 PM
So you fault GM for saying ‘Thank you.’
And you fault them for the style in which they said ‘Thank you.’
And no doubt that, eventually, they’d be faulted for not saying ‘Thank you.’
You blame them for the bankruptcy and favoritism for the UAW.
You have them in a damned if they do, damned if the don’t, situation.
How very… feminine of you, AP.
silverfox on November 27, 2010 at 3:23 AM
“You blame them for the bankruptcy and favoritism for the UAW.”
Insert: Did GM elect President BHO ?
silverfox on November 27, 2010 at 3:26 AM
silverfox: I find the “thank you” ad is just rubbing salt into the wound of the bailout.
A majority of the American people (myself very much included) opposed the bailout to begin with, but were not able to prevent it. And, had we been willing to do some sort of bailout, it wouldn’t have been to give GM to the government and the UAW while screwing the bondholders, who legally had first claim on the assets. The shareholders took their chances when they made an equity investment, but still you don’t have to rub salt in the wounds.
CatoRenasci on November 27, 2010 at 7:26 AM
Point of order – other than the $360 million “warranty obligations” loan (actually paid back by Old GM during bankruptcy), and perhaps the dividend on the preferred stock (which, more likely, came out of the $7.5 billion net unused Debtor-In-Possession financing gifted to Government Motors when they exited bankruptcy), they paid NOTHING back.
steveegg on November 27, 2010 at 7:50 AM
And now that I go back through the archives, that dividend on the preferred stock DID come out of the unused DIP financing gifted to Government Motors (though not out of the net.
Bonus item; the early repurchase of said preferred stock, which (assuming GM survives through 2014) will cost the taxpayers $710 million, will also come out of that $7.5 billion.
steveegg on November 27, 2010 at 8:02 AM
RICO indictment appropriate.
Mason on November 27, 2010 at 11:56 AM
The amount GM is spending to advertise on the networks during sporting events has to be astronomical this month. Accepting taxayer dollars so they can give incentives to buyers versus Ford is so wrong and why I will never drive another GM product.
PhiKapMom on November 27, 2010 at 12:50 PM
Gag. Just saw this on the Ohio Michigan game halftime. It’s even worse seeing on the big screen than it was on my computer.
Cecil on November 27, 2010 at 1:48 PM
I stand corrected. The individual purchases were acquistions, not sales.
Sorry for the misinformation.
Cecil on November 27, 2010 at 1:55 PM
The Unions made a fortune during the IPO.
Wade on November 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2