Obama WH gives Congress green light on pork
posted at 12:15 pm on November 15, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
The President weighed in over the weekend on the controversy over earmarks, using his weekly address to tell Americans that earmarks are “a bad Washington habit,” and that reforming them will “take a step towards restoring public trust.” Will Barack Obama find the courage to confront his own party’s lame-duck session to stop it from porking up an omnibus spending bill that they have to pass to avoid allowing John Boehner to dictate spending habits for the remainder of FY2011? Not exactly:
White House senior advisor David Axelrod made it clear on Sunday that President Obama has made no commitment to vetoing spending bills that contain earmarks despite calls from fiscal hawks for the president to make that pledge.
Axelrod suggested it may be too late in the year for the president to refuse his signature on bills that contain pork.
“Obviously, this is very late in the game in terms of budgeting and keeping the functions of government operating,” he said on “Fox News Sunday.” “One of the problems is that these things come embedded in bills that have to be signed.”
It doesn’t take a genius to understand this signal. Obama is afraid of what will happen if the Republicans get their hands on this year’s budget, especially with ObamaCare and the EPA’s intent to regulate carbon dioxide on their own. The lame-duck session has barely enough time to get the rest of the budget through both chambers of Congress and a conference committee as it is. A veto would almost certainly run out the clock on the Democratic majority in the House, and that means Republicans would get to write the budget now rather than starting in October of next year. David Axelrod’s semaphore to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid couldn’t be clearer if he had hired a skywriter to paint “PORK IS THE NEW HOPENCHANGE” across a Potomac sunrise.
This, of course, is a brilliant demonstration of just how badly pork corrodes the budgeting process. In order to get a quick deal to ensure passage of a budget on their terms, Democratic leadership has to offer boatloads of pork to buy votes in the House and particularly the Senate. The President needs to sign off on pork to make sure he gets all the money he wants to work around Congress on these issues. It’s poison, injected into the body politic one line item at a time.
Talk is cheap, Mr. President. Obama cannot pose as a spending reformer while the White House puts the pig on the barbecue and invites everyone to dig in while it’s hot.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Does that pig have any lipstick on her?
ted c on November 15, 2010 at 12:19 PM
I’m almost embarrassed by own feelings of Schadenfreude about the buyer’s remorse of independents.
Drained Brain on November 15, 2010 at 12:20 PM
Finally, definitive proof he’s not a Muslim.
zmdavid on November 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM
Pork: The Other White M………………..
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!!!!!!
pilamaye on November 15, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Budgeting?! Budgeting?! You want to talk about budgeting?!
forest on November 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM
The Republicans should throw as much sand in the gears as possible. This country cannot afford another Pelosi budget.
zmdavid on November 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM
Reminds me of the King who, while gorging himself on food, laments about the starvation of his people.
right2bright on November 15, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Any bill presented…can be re-presented after being amended.
Just veto, and state, “Take the pork out” and then I will sign.
How difficult is that?
right2bright on November 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM
Make sure you put lipstick on it, Mr. President!
What if the Senate Republicans filibuster the budget, but agree to fund the Government in a continuing resolution at 2009 levels through January 2011? Wouldn’t this give the new Republican House control of the budget in January, rather than having to wait until October (start of FY 2012)? If Democrats cry foul, Republicans can say that Democrats should have passed a budget BEFORE the election, BEFORE the start of the fiscal year on October 1–why didn’t they?
Steve Z on November 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM
Sure he can. Almost every journalist will buy it.
zmdavid on November 15, 2010 at 12:34 PM
No wonder Muslims hate us–PORK! but seriously, folks…
Obama knows that Pork($) is the mother’s milk of politics, its what he does not what he says.
cartooner on November 15, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Nancy Pelosi memo: Spend everything you can while the gavel’s still in my pathetic hand. Oh, and the bus is about to leave the terminal.
Rovin on November 15, 2010 at 12:35 PM
My guess is that Axelrod’s eyes are brown.
Wouldn’t it be delicious if the “blue dogs” (whimpering mutts) in the House–whether they won or lost–banded together to say to Pelosi, “Hey, FU!”
BuckeyeSam on November 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM
I like your thinking. It makes sense. Thus it stands no chance of being enacted by the fearless Senate Republicans. Not to mention they would see their pork cut too.
GnuBreed on November 15, 2010 at 12:51 PM
Bumma is afraid as are all cowards that his legacy and reelection prospects are not good,not good at all. That said if he is really confronted he will waffle,back down and spin to save face. Roughly 49 or 50 day are left before the house flips. Surely there are enough parliamentary moves available to pass a continuing resolution or two and derail nanzi and hairy for a few days.
Bumma does not care about this country,or what congress does for the people it is all about him,axrod has already said he is on his way back to Chicago to get his boy reelected. Every move needs to be couched in terms of how bomma will look bad if he does not get in line with the voters want done,then fear of not becoming the legend he thinks he is will drive him to cave in.
Calling dems and telling them that their boy will fail if he does not get with the program might also be worthwhile.
2012 is going to be another bust for the dems if the republicans do not mess up. NO PORK how is that confusing to this bunch that has just returned to DC.
Col.John Wm. Reed on November 15, 2010 at 12:51 PM
It’s tough when you have to like, take a stand and stuff. Amazing that this knucklehead has been in office this long and still wants to straddle the fence. Being President is hard! *sniff, tear*
search4truth on November 15, 2010 at 12:53 PM
Republicans must seize this highly visible opportunity to slam earmarks. Now is the time to contrast the Republican and Democratic responses to the voice of the American people. If Senate Republicans do not vote now to stop earmarks I will change my registration from Republican to Independent.
GaltBlvnAtty on November 15, 2010 at 12:58 PM
This is the same excuse he gave in April 2009.
MayBee on November 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM
This says it all
bumma has NO POLICY other than himself.
“President Obama has made no commitment to vetoing spending bills that contain earmarks”
No nads at all!
Col.John Wm. Reed on November 15, 2010 at 1:04 PM
The unmitigated gall of this White House to send Axlerod out to the cameras claiming that there’s no time to refuse earmarks. It’s been nearly TWO YEARS! Or does Obama think we’ve forgotten his campaign-trail rhetoric on the subject?
Murf76 on November 15, 2010 at 1:04 PM
RedState had a post a week or so ago about how Pelosi was secretly working with Senate GOP porkmeisters to include their pork in the funding bill.
To maintain a filibuster (and once they seat Mark Kirk from Illinois, there will be only 58 in the Dem caucus), the GOP would have to have keep the porkmeisters in line. Don’t know how many there are, but Cochran, Shelby and Murkowski come to mind.
Wethal on November 15, 2010 at 1:12 PM
But earmarks are the American way. The Constitution says so
– Random Earmark Supporter
Also, if earmarks are needed to get the budget passed, kinda makes the whole “earmarks are a small part of spending anyway” argument seem a bit ridiculous, doesn’t it?
catmman on November 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM
Step 1. Create an emergency via procrastination
Step 2. Do not let that emergency go to waste
MayBee on November 15, 2010 at 1:24 PM
Republicans need to show some resolve and demonstrate that they have some backbone, because the people are relatively well engaged on this issue: Pound Obama and the Democrates on this budget charade.
GaltBlvnAtty on November 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM
Do you really think Mitch McConnell will do this? He likes his pork, too.
ladyingray on November 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM
Mitch McConnell may be a generation too old to engage in the good fight.
GaltBlvnAtty on November 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM
He does and he used to be a perfectly content country club lazy ass RINO. He may have seen the writing on the wall, though. RINOs and Dems are on their way out.
Until we all get stupid and lazy again.
dogsoldier on November 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM
“This is the same excuse he gave in April 2009.”
MayBee on November 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM
He had an exceptional excuse then that the budget was passed by the Congress BEFORE he became president. Now this lying bastard is afraid to veto any earmarks because he will then get a new Congress to write the budget bill for this coming year and it will be Republican. If McConnell and Inhofe think that they will get away with this crap they are mistaken. I’m an old guy and there has been no national movements in my lifetime like the current Tea Party. The old RINOs had better understand this or they will be gone in ’12.
inspectorudy on November 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM
Barry is against pork, unless he’s for it.
GarandFan on November 15, 2010 at 1:57 PM
A pork of an Obamateurism!
Schadenfreude on November 15, 2010 at 2:05 PM
Obama has always been a pretender, he just keeps changing what he pretends to be to suit the moment.
But calling McConnell and Imhofe “RINOs” is just plain ignorant. McConnell’s lifetime ACU rating is 90; Imhofe’s is 98. NINETY-freakin’-EIGHT. You have to be stupid to call these guys RINOs, just stupid.
And NOT conservative – except in the sense that Beria was conservative.
Adjoran on November 15, 2010 at 2:14 PM
Smoking was a bad habit that the President was going to quit after he was elected too. Any word on that?
nogooddeed on November 15, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Washington Examiner 2:30 p.m.
Wethal on November 15, 2010 at 2:45 PM
It looks like McConnell has seen the light! He took a right at the fork in the road instead of to left for the old RINO’s retirement home. Inhofe, that’s with an “N” is the only one left standing opposing this symbolic gesture. Let’s see if his 98 ACU grade will allow him to keep his seat or he might just be the highest ranking conservative to be ousted for not getting it. I think there will be a new rating system offered by the Tea Party and it will have a few differences from the ACU system. I like Inhofe especially on his AGW stance but being senior and tough does not mean you understand where the mood of the country is.
inspectorudy on November 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM
Good for McConnell. Now we need Inhofe to see the light. This is an example of the results The People can get, now that we are awake and vigilant.
GaltBlvnAtty on November 15, 2010 at 3:20 PM