I like her, but she is not presidential, and it would make Delaware and Nevada look like nailbiters for GOP nominees.

Another concern troll heard from.

Look, if the Republicans nominate Daffy Duck in 2012, they win. Obama is a guaranteed one termer.

Rush Limbaugh has said the Left will tell who they fear. And clearly they fear Sarah Palin more than any other candidate because of the vitriol spewed in her direction. The Left here also includes the Vichy Republicans, the GOP Establishment Old Guard.

Look at how many so-called conservatives went out of their way to spread the false meme that President Bush said Palin wasn’t qualified to be President and that he was prepared to endorse Obama because Palin was added to the GOP ticket. Bush himself denited it on El Rushbo’s show the other day. It was advanced by more cowardly anonymous GOP staffers and advisers (most like Romney turds, the same ones who did the hatchet job on her from inside the McCain campaign).

Haha

scared sheetless

I like her, but she is not presidential, and it would make Delaware and Nevada look like nailbiters for GOP nominees.

*Pls wish me well; headache here for 2nd day in a row*

ProudPalinFan on November 11, 2010 at 12:57 PM

Sent a Hail Mary up for you.

Tea party senators WON allah

Rand Paul
Ron Johnson
Marco Rubio
Pat Toomey

Do they not count?

Look Palin is running, winning the primary, and will beat Obama if Rubio is the VP

picklesgap on November 10, 2010 at 7:54 PM

HotAir’s traffic will break the record of the VP debate between her and Biden (there were +500 in the chatroom!) I’d pay for that one!

Hope you get to feeling better!

I mean he’s nice, has been in the rat cave of DC and made it out alive; and he’s from PA and all but he’s not a leader!

I don’t think he’d make a “straw poll” for 2012 or 2016! I have stated over and over how much ticked off I am over these men thinkin’ they deserve it and got it but are trying to put Sarah on the side. Now after the elections came out, several of them gave her credit for her Tea Party candidates that won, and her help. Now that’s pretty much it.

Let the wolves eat themselves; the hunt is hard, and there are not many prizes to catch. My money’s on the bear.

*Pls wish me well; headache here for 2nd day in a row*

TheAlamos on November 11, 2010 at 4:20 AM

Agreed, while the current C-in-C is sucking up to those who would kill us and alienating our allies even as I type.

Everytime I think of Newt on the bench with Pelosi I cringe.

I want a conservitative canidate that I can be proud to support. Not just a “well he ain’t Obama” canidate.

Huckabee’s current net favorables among Republicans actually top hers, if only slightly: He clocks in at 74/10

Where the heck are these Huckabee Repubs? I don’t know anyone who’s for him.

And Palin will definitely toss her hat in the ring. She’s not going to back down simply because some think she should. That’s absurd. None of the men do, even though they can’t win. Why should she?

Palin has survived the ultimate “vetting.” The fact that Palin has such a high favorable rating after the MSM has thrown the kitchen sink at her, with falsehoods abounding, tells me she is the one. The MSM made the mistake of unloading on her too much for too long. Now most of what they say falls on deaf ears and only makes her supporters work that much harder. The RINOs have also had to back off everytime a negative comment about her is attributed to them and the only thing they have ruined is their own reputations. I think she is the only potential candidate that could get the very enthusiastic support of Rush, Hannity, Beck and Levin and that is no small matter.
Palin draws crowds without having to bus them in and buy them lunch. She is smart, always stays positive, does not talk over people’s heads and has the “gravitas” to be taken very seriously.

Palin is one tough woman and she’d make a great contrast to O – people would finally have a real choice.

…. meanwhile, SARAH PALIN IS SO BUSY HONORING OUR VETERANS AND PRAISING SOLDIERS!

SARAH PALIN’S HEART AND INTENT IS ONLY FOR THE LOVE OF THIS COUNTRY!

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=454634393434

Got it.

Norwegian on November 11, 2010 at 12:27 AM

So, Yes?

slickwillie2001 on November 10, 2010 at 11:41 PM

Terrye on November 10, 2010 at 11:44 PM

Norwegian on November 11, 2010 at 12:27 AM

Yes or No?

Listen, if “electability” is your primary concern for choosing our nominee, then by all means follow that logic to its natural conclusion per poll references above:

Nominate Huckabee

Oh, you say don’t want Huckabee? Well, I guess your “electability” argument only applies to candidates you like. Yeah, that makes us really value your “insights” /s

I can easily argue that Romney is unelectable (anti-mormon sentiment) or that Gingrich is unelectable (thrice married) or that Daniels is unelectable (short, bald, tax-hiker with the charisma of a napkin). But I am really not worried about either of them winning the nomination, so why waste my time.

Palin will run, and she is likely to win the nomination in my opinion. If you disagree, your time is probably better spent arguing why YOUR candidate is better rather than spout nonsense which only solidifies her support.

I think that her biggest obstacle with a lot of people is her leaving the Governorship of AK and then moving onto the national spot light. But I also think that as time passes that will not be as big a deal.

But there are a lot of people who will never accept her, just because of what she represents to them…and of course that in and of itself makes her supporters even more loyal.

I will say one thing however, it would be a mistake to underestimate her.

Fun punditry, but at current conditions there’s no way she challenges him because she’d just lose to the Republican. That fight would be way nastier than the 2008 primary and would weaken them both considerably. She’ll be the good soldier until she resigns and then be a private person until she sees a good time to get back into politics.

alwaysfiredup on November 10, 2010 at 7:51 PM

Re Hillary, she just doesn’t have the time. Her political clock is ticking and by 2016 her age will be used against her.

I also don’t think the progressive movement would think twice about throwing Bammie under the bus for the sake of the cause. If they decide he’s a certain loser for 2012, why not roll the dice? The black vote? Where are they going to go? The progressive movement is run by whites, they have no inherent loyalty to the plantation voters.