Bennet camp to radio station: Just ask about how groovy he is, mm-kay?
posted at 3:03 pm on October 27, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
I’ve been doing talk shows on terrestrial radio for almost seven years, and daily Internet shows for the last three-plus years, and have interviewed hundreds of politicians in that period. Obviously, they appear on these shows to push their message and/or campaigns, so their staffs usually try to subtly set boundaries of dialogue to keep the politician from getting blindsided or going off message. Mainly, they just ask the show hosts what topics will come up during the spot and gauge their preparation accordingly. On occasion, their staff will ask to avoid a certain topic, and rarely will demand that certain questions don’t get asked, which typically get answered with, “Can’t promise anything.” In almost seven years, I could probably count the incidences of the latter on one hand, and as I recall, all of them had to do with personal issues that weren’t germane anyway.
Never — and I mean never — has a staffer attempted to provide me with the questions I’d be allowed to ask. Colorado radio station KOA apparently had never heard of such a thing either, and were so amused by the attempt from Senator Michael Bennet’s staff to script the interview that they posted the e-mail on their Facebook page:
What, no question on what enchants Bennet the most about being in the Senate? Find Jeff Zeleny, stat!
Take a look at that list of questions, and notice what’s not there. The Bennet camp didn’t offer a single question about policy — not on spending, not on the economy, not on the deficit, not even on the environment. Why doesn’t the Bennet campaign want their candidate talking about the issues? Do they see a problem if Bennet gets asked substantive questions, because the answers would alienate Colorado voters? They also avoided any questions about Bennet’s record as an appointed replacement for Ken Salazar, with one exception: they allowed KOA to ask Bennet about his “greatest accomplishment.”
Notice anything else about this list? It sets up Bennet to talk about nothing but himself. Coloradans may still be laboring under the impression that the election is about them, and how they get represented in Washington, so this is a helpful reminder that Coloradans should stop being so selfish. After all, the big takeaway from interviews with Bennet should be whether he’s “having fun,” not whether Coloradans can look forward to more taxes, higher spending, and more economic stagnation.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

House Judiciary Committee to Justice: Explain snooping on AP, please

British troops told not to wear uniforms outside bases after yesterday’s attack in London








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Yes, it changes the way you hold your self, your eyes, your weight, and features change when your facial musculature changes. This also happens to ordinary people who change moods and when the camera is from a different angle. I think your discrepancy detector has been warped by mental illness, frankly, because nothing else would account for it.
SarahW on April 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM
“Nothing else would account for it”?
Uhm… howsabout the obvious deduction that the college ID photo and the mug shot are two different young men? Is that “nothing else,” or something else?
Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 8:01 PM
We could ask the Dark Knight Rises property manager about this, but he’s dead and buried in Newtown, CT.
Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 8:06 PM
You address “the way you hold your self, your eyes, your weight, and features change when your facial musculature changes” but not eye color? Not the width of the nose?
Now I realize that you’re calling me crazy. ” I think your discrepancy detector has been warped by mental illness…” I think you are employed by those who orchestrated the Aurora massacre.
I think your denial of the obvious is warped by your involvement with the Aurora massacre hit team, frankly, because nothing else would account for it.
Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 8:18 PM
Not wanting to get involved in the personal p@ssing match, but to me The Enquirer holds more credibility than the Slimes and a lot of media outlets. Actually, there really aren’t any “legacy” media that I’d hold above The Enquirer.
Until I hear/read differently I’d tend to believe it as I do most media info.
kim roy on April 5, 2013 at 11:35 PM
So the thread is dead after we point out a particular mindset and what verbaluce is readily endorsing.
Oopsies.
rogerb on April 6, 2013 at 7:39 AM
They’re real reason for wanting gun control has nothing to do with stopping these incidents. Their desire is to control our behavior because they think they know what is better for us, just like all fascist, ignorant goons.
dogsoldier on April 6, 2013 at 9:06 AM
Worth the price of admission, right there. LOL.
Cleombrotus on April 6, 2013 at 9:26 AM
How many reports of this nature are ignored every day?
AND for good reason. The “psychiatrist” obviously did not have enough evidence. That’s typical.
This scat will become even more common as the “gun control” BS spirals out of control. Some have already blamed “anti-depressants”.
LOL
Face it, those of you who need a reason as to why he did what he did:
He’s just your run-of-the-mill psychopath seeking a legacy.
Read: “The Rage of the Random Actor” by Korem.
This guy is no more more “mentally ill” than most reading this.
~(Ä)~
Karl Magnus on April 6, 2013 at 12:38 PM
I think we need strong background checks and positive ID checks through a national database to vote. It’s for the children, you know.
Jeff2161 on April 6, 2013 at 2:12 PM
Are you serious or is this sarcasm.
While I don’t trust doctors not to sell out to the government, especially these new doctor-lites that Obamacare will usher in to contain costs, the idea that a psychiatrist’s comments of warning should go unchecked and unnoticed by police due to insufficient ‘evidence’ is preposterous — certainly so with the laws we have today mandating reporting of certain forms of homocidal ideation, and considering the legal basis for MDs’ authority to involuntarily commit.
And then, to ignore a complaint of stalking, and electronic threats and harrassment (which are especially easy to check), especially by a psychiatrist, as unworthy of any notice because of insufficient evidence is particularly ludicrous (not the rapper).
You’ve got to be kidding, right?
flicker on April 6, 2013 at 8:54 PM
A guy called a talk show in Philly to report that after telling his doc that he drinks two six-packs a night, the doc reported him to the police and he lost his driver’s license.
So I think the authorities are not bashful about reacting to the concerns of medical professionals regarding their patients’ psych problems, real or imagined. Not that I agree with them in the case I mentioned, I’m just sayin.
Of course, given the fact that the shooter’s mug shot bears no resemblance to his purported college ID photo, there are other problems with this uh, event that demand investigation.
Akzed on April 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM
Enforce the laws on the books, a brillant new idea.
JackM on April 8, 2013 at 9:01 AM
On another thread, I blamed the people of Colorado for that jackass congresswoman who can’t articulate the difference between a large capcity magazine from a vibrator. I also demanded they tell us exactly how they were going to make things right.
I now blame them for all the harm the Colorado gun grabbers will do to America.
And I want them to fix it. Now.
JackM on April 8, 2013 at 9:07 AM
Dr. Fenton should have told the police she knew of a gun that was going to take one of her patients on a killing spree.
JackM on April 8, 2013 at 9:18 AM
Liberals should be ashamed as they tap dance in the pool of blood drawn by murdered children.
JackM on April 8, 2013 at 9:50 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3