Juan Williams: I used to think the right was the intolerant side
posted at 4:25 pm on October 22, 2010 by Allahpundit
Heh. Between this and his hint-hinting on “Fox & Friends” this morning that maybe it’s time for NPR to leave the government-funded nest, he’s number one with a bullet on this week’s list of “Conservatives’ Favorite Liberals.” (Sorry, KP!)
As for his point that NPR was looking for a reason to get rid of him, they’ve already all but admitted it. The ombudsman claimed this morning that it was his alleged pattern of saying outrageously outrageous things on Fox that made this the final straw, although from what I can tell, the “pattern” consists of this incident plus maybe two others that no one who doesn’t read Media Matters obsessively would ever remember. Said the ombudsman, “Many [people who e-mailed us] have been troubled over the years by the dual role that Williams has played: balanced news analyst on NPR; more opinionated pundit on Fox.” And that’s the crux of it, isn’t it? Not the “opinionated pundit” part, which would be A-OK if he was on MSNBC playing pattycake with Olbermann about how racist the right is, but the fact that he’s on Fox conversing pleasantly with Bill O’Reilly. Lefty Michael Tomasky gives it to us straight:
[W]hat sort of non-conservative – one perceives Williams to be some degree of liberal; he’d probably protest that he’s just a reporter; in either case, he’s not a conservative – agreed to be an in-house flunky at Fox? I’m sure they offered him nice money, and money is money, and I can’t say with certainty that I’d have turned it down if Rupert had waved it under my nose.
But if you’re any kind of liberal at all, even in the softest and most non-political possible sense, it’s basically an indefensible thing to do. Fox News wants liberalism to perish from the face of the earth. Going on their air on a regular basis and lending your name and reputation to their ideological razzle-dazzle is like agreeing to be the regular kulak guest columnist at Pravda in 1929. For “balance”…
[I]n the final analysis, it’s not surprising, from a psychological point of view, that after all these years of going on their air and drinking their green-room coffee, Williams should choose to ingratiate himself with O’Reilly and his viewers with that Foxy rhetoric. In a sense, Williams got what was coming to him. Sleep with dogs, get fleas.
They needed a pretext to purge the resident “Fox News liberal” and they got one. Simple as that. Or rather, almost as simple as that: There’s also the small matter of their hysterical overreaction to Williams admitting to a twinge of anxiety about flying with devout Muslims in the post-9/11 era. For a response to that, read this clear-eyed op-ed at the Journal by Muslim Emilio Karim Dabul noting that, in certain circumstances, he gets a little nervous around Muslims at the airport too.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Nope. I’m not scared of all black people. Figures that you’d read something into a post that wasn’t there. And, by your lame response, you seem to indicate that there’s no need to worry about Muslims on airplanes because 3,000 people were killed by Muslims 9 years ago. Is there some kind of statute of limitations when the worrying becomes dumb? Is it 10 years? 15? Please, enlighten us…
joejm65 on October 22, 2010 at 5:39 PM
I think it was pointed at my chest though. Does that count darwin?
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
That’s not the question. What is it that changed Juan Williams? Was it sitting next to Muslims in Muslim garb during American Political Theory?
Was it going to the mall and seeing Muslims in Muslim garb?
No, it was the hijacking of four American aircraft, three of which flew into buildings killing 3,000 people.
Does a sane person become wary after an incident like that? Especially since Muslims have been hijacking aircraft since the ’70′s?
Did he say he’s wary of all Muslims? Anywhere, anytime?
What about the Muslim who wrote the piece in the WSJ that says he feels the same way?
darwin on October 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
May lorien continue to be free to use anything he pleases. I use it a lot, in context, and assure you that I’m not afraid to be un-PC. If you don’t get what I mean, it’s not my challenge. If you know me, you fully understand that I abhor tyrants of any kind and wish for all the people to be free. Color, creed, religion and all the cultural differences leave me cold. How a person is and what they stand for are most telling. One has to know right from wrong. Not all the liberal imaginations are bigotry.
Schadenfreude on October 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
Come on, he was referencing Hillary. You know this, if not then, you at least know it now.
Esthier on October 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
You’re just mad you fell for the bait. That’s all. And you knew it the second I called on you on it. Then, you pretended like it was no longer offensive after you realized Hillary is the originator of the “plantation” bit.
So cry your crocodile tears elsewhere.
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
Plenty of large American farms couldn’t operate without their subsidies. In that regard, the market has spoken. I don’t ever really eat corn; why should my tax dollars go to fund it? Just because other people do? Not enough, apparently, to keep it going.
Some things are worth while, even if they don’t garner the audience necessary to fully fund their operation. Like American corn farmers, and sciencey radio shows like Radiolab.
ernesto on October 22, 2010 at 5:41 PM
I posted the link and it ignored it. It was no longer offensive after it realized hillary was the original source. Odd how that works.
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 5:41 PM
Don’t you lazy “law students” know how to do simple research? You’ll find examples at Newsbusters, just enter “NPR” in the search box.
Del Dolemonte on October 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
No, you don’t think.
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
What’s your point then? You said you’re: “shall we say, more aware of my surroundings”? It’s pretty hard not to read something into that because on its own, it’s meaningless.
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
Sure that counts. Why did you misrepresent what he said though.
darwin on October 22, 2010 at 5:43 PM
Del Dolemonte on October 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
The Law Students I knew didn’t have time to waste the day getting into arguments on the internet.
Probably lying about that too.
Probably a telemarketer or unemployed.
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 5:43 PM
Typo I assume.
CWforFreedom on October 22, 2010 at 5:43 PM
Juan Williams,
Welcome to the side of Light!!
canopfor on October 22, 2010 at 5:44 PM
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
Anyone who is rational and who has had their life threatened, is going to be a tad more aware of their surroundings afterwards.
Why is it with you liberals that you insist on arguing even the most obvious points?
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 5:45 PM
LOL, you can’t have it both ways. First of all, you seem to think that the “age” of Nina’s comment should make it irrelevant, but then you say that Juan’s problem included what he said in the past.
Yep, you’ll make a fine paralegal.
Del Dolemonte on October 22, 2010 at 5:45 PM
Did you like my Al Sharpton comment yesterday!?!..:)
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 5:46 PM
JW admits in his interview with George Steppinupinit that Williams has seen managemetn come and go over his ten years at NPR and that the hostility towards Fox News had escalated with the current management.
crr6: You are being deliberately obtuse about what JW said on BOR. He followed up his personal, visceral reaction to seeing Muslim-garbed passengers with an awareness that it is not a good idea to paint a whole group with a smear based on the actions of a few.
I myself have witnessed questionable behavior by ME young men on flights or preparatory to flights, enough to raise red flags of concern. Prior to the rule that passengers must stay in their seats as a plane begins descent, I saw young ME men simultaneously arise from acattered sections of the plane and head toward the bathrooms. A rehearsal or psy-ops? Who knows?
I watched a young ME man sweating bullets as we headed in line toward final security clearance before boarding on an overseas flight while his obviously cowed, veiled wife stood by passively with her eyes downcast. (Who knows what was going on with that marriage that did not appear to be made in heaven?)
onlineanalyst on October 22, 2010 at 5:46 PM
Del Dolemonte on October 22, 2010 at 5:45 PM
A poor illegal is more like it.
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 5:46 PM
I have no problem with doing away with pork like farm subsidies.
ladyingray on October 22, 2010 at 5:47 PM
I wonder if Juan will start to question his other beliefs about conservatives. Wednesday I saw him in a row with Hannity over rent controls. He honestly thought they were helpful.
But if that were the case, then why are rents in NY so high, despite decades of rent control? Easy. Nobody wants to build inexpensive apartments, because the government won’t allow thos buildings to turn a profit. So the supply dries up, prices go up, and the remaining low-cost apartments devolve into ratholes.
hawksruleva on October 22, 2010 at 5:47 PM
The crazy thing is that we as a society were asleep for over 20 years while the terrorists plotted against us. 9/11 forced us out of our slumber, and the liberals keep trying to force Sleep-Eze down our throats.
john1schn on October 22, 2010 at 5:47 PM
That’s when they knew definitively that he’d left their plantation, or that he’d never been on it.
Schadenfreude on October 22, 2010 at 5:47 PM
Conflate on. Idiot.
CWforFreedom on October 22, 2010 at 5:47 PM
Sorry, lorien, should have indented my original comment :(
Schadenfreude on October 22, 2010 at 5:48 PM
Opera & Orchestra = Bravo and some other high-number channels like it. Sesame street=Discovery Kids, Disney, Nickelodeon, ABC Family, etc. It’s not like there’s nowhere to get those programs.
alwaysfiredup on October 22, 2010 at 5:49 PM
LOL, your side of the aisle actually fabricated a racial controversy about O’Reilly several years ago. Remember Sylvia’s?
Del Dolemonte on October 22, 2010 at 5:50 PM
You are absolutely horrid at formulating even rudimentary arguments. You just snipe, like a child. It’s friday, have no playdates been arranged for you?
ernesto on October 22, 2010 at 5:50 PM
Sudsidies are designed to keep the large farms from gobbling up the smaller ones. Grow too much, you lose them. In reality, if you let the free market takes its course, there would less farmers in the country for sure (small farms would go away), but we’d probably end up paying less for our food as more efficient farming mechanisms would come into play.
Sudsidies keep old, out of date technology in fashion. Same with illegals – their low price point makes it un-necessary for farms to modernize to improve production.
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 5:51 PM
What bait? What are you even talking about? Do you see why it’s not very persuasive to come back later after making a racist comment to say “See, I was only being pretend racist! And you took the bait!” Seriously, buzz off.
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 5:51 PM
The difference between Juan, and a typical liberal is…Juan admits his apprehensions, but uses logic, and intelligence to allay them. Knowing millions of Americans feel the same way.
The typical liberal has neither the courage, convictions or honesty to admit they feel the same way. Rather, they hide it, and use their self appointed moral compass to judge others.
capejasmine on October 22, 2010 at 5:51 PM
Bullsh*t. I said ‘more aware of my surroundings’. It means avoiding certain neighborhoods and making sure my car doors are locked and windows are up when I’m in it. I didn’t say I hate or worry about all black men. The point is, for those who missed it completely, is that events can make someone look at the world a little differently. I look at driving through a certain area of New Haven a little differently than I did when I was younger. I have to, because I don’t want a repeat of what happened to me. Juan W. looks at flying a little differently than he did on 9/10/01. Events shape our perspective. It doesn’t mean that bigotry or hatred is involved. We’re talking about normal human reactions. Normal, that is, unless you are the top brass at NPR. Then, normal human traits become unacceptable.
joejm65 on October 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Where is Al Sharpton and J. Jackson? Have they nothing to say to this? NAACP?
Schadenfreude on October 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
So this crr6 is one of your resident trolls? From what I have read everything that has happened to anyone else has also happened to the troll. What a liar. DO you guys keep it fed for your amusement? It cant possibly be because it’s interesting.
Shambhala on October 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
The muslim saying that he was at times uncomfortable around other muslims at the airport is irrelevant to the socialists. To them, it’s like blacks throwing around the N-word; do not report, nothing here to see, move on, look a squirrel!
slickwillie2001 on October 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
ernesto on October 22, 2010 at 5:41 PM
You can broadcast over the internet now for pretty much nothing.
Why do we need a federal subsidy for radio towers?
In five years, there will likely be no need for towers any longer.
Speed their demise.
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Was that where Media Matters got upset because BOR said “you people”?..:)
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Then why do they garner such support amongst conservatives? Could it be that even the vaunted “real american” is occasionally out to take money that isn’t theirs? Is this really not just a liberal problem??
ernesto on October 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
If I say that I feel a little nervous when I see a yellow Penske rental truck, does that make me a ‘bad’ person?
There’s a very good reason Ryder went with a white color scheme after the Oklahoma bombing.
Anyone who says that past events do not affect their emotional response is a liar or a sociopath.
Peri Winkle on October 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Follow the money.Juan’s firing comes on the heels of NPR receiving a $1.8 million grant from the Open Society Foundations (Institute) to begin a project called Impact of Government that will add at least 100 journalists at NPR member radio stations in all 50 states over the next three years.
As you’ve probably heard by now, George Soros, the Puppet Master, is the money behind the Open Society Institute. The following information comes from discoverthenetworks.org:
Established in 1993, the Open Society Institute (OSI) is the most prominent of the numerous foundations belonging to Soros. OSI proclaims that it is “a nonpartisan, nonpolitical entity” whose funding agendas are “wholly separate” from “George Soros’s private political activities,”. Yeah, right.
kingsjester on October 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM
Do you support that Jesse Jackson admitted the same thing, and if so, why would you not support BOR for the same thing, IF he’d said it?
capejasmine on October 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM
I got your point joe.
darwin on October 22, 2010 at 5:54 PM
Do you support reading the entire thread to see if I’ve already addressed that?
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 5:54 PM
Black people didn’t ram into those building and kill 3000. Why even raise this question?
Schadenfreude on October 22, 2010 at 5:54 PM
Hey, I am trying to have a conversation with ernesto.
ladyingray on October 22, 2010 at 5:54 PM
Let’s not forget that a lot of the corporations who fund NPR receive Federal funding themselves.
Del Dolemonte on October 22, 2010 at 5:54 PM
Fixed.
portlandon on October 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM
They have commented..Here is the link..:)
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM
Juan didn’t tow the line, like all black people should. He’s a traitor now. I’m sure that’s why we’re hearing crickets, rather than their thoughts on this.
They agree with NPR. You don’t say anything, or have an individual thought, unless it’s pre-approved by a high ranking liberal/tryant.
capejasmine on October 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM
How about packaging yourself up and addressing yourself “return to sender”?
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM
There still ought to be a public means, even if it amounts to public access internet TV and radio stations. Individuals who wish to further the arts and sciences ought to be able to do so without playing slave to the profit motive. It’s really a pittance when you think about it. Even if federally its not required, I would fight tooth and nail for NY state to fund public access to communications technology. Its just part of who I am, I really truly believe in public access.
I’m as abhorred as the rest of you over Williams. All day I’ve said how much I like him. I’m livid over his treatment, but I believe in public broadcasting, I do. I just don’t know how to reconcile those beliefs.
ernesto on October 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM
Why don’t you address the question I’ve asked you twice.
darwin on October 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM
Bingo.
http://mediamatters.org/research/200709210007
Del Dolemonte on October 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM
Well that’s not particularly objectionable. The way you phrased it made it appear as if you were using a euphemism for saying “I’m scared of black people.” If that’s not the case, then I’m sorry for attributing that to you.
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM
Seriously, internet. Why are you so anticapitalist?
alwaysfiredup on October 22, 2010 at 5:57 PM
joejm65 on October 22, 2010 at 5:21 PM
Joe, Michael Tomasky is projecting. What he really means, but can’t admit to himself, is that they want conservatism to perish from the face of the earth.
But I think what they are really afraid of is a preference cascade.
LarryD on October 22, 2010 at 5:57 PM
Watch out..Don’t mess with an Elvis song like that..:)
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 5:57 PM
I suppose I should but I came late to the party. So while I’m reading, I’ll ask this. What are your thoughts about Obama taking his teleprompter to India, and the press in India reporting it as if Obama’s a d@mn fool for doing so? ROFL
capejasmine on October 22, 2010 at 5:58 PM
Thanks for the link..:)
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 5:58 PM
Let him make such a comment, then worry about it. Jesse Jackson already made such a comment. So did the late Cardinal O’Connor in NYC. Neither of them lost any work over it.
joejm65 on October 22, 2010 at 5:58 PM
It’s not just a liberal problem. It’s dependence issue.
Look, it’s simple. This is the same problem with welfare, food stamps, etc etc.
Would you rather have $50 for doing nothing or $70 for hard work. I’d take the $50. I think most people would. That’s just human. We’re lazy creatures.
I don’t know how to break the cycle, really. Cuz if you cut off sudsidies, a lot of people (short term) would probably go under. It’s one of those things, I think, where you have to phase it out…and I generally support this idea for unemployment, food stamps, etc too.
Let’s say you earn $70 on food stamps. But if you get a job, you lose them (or your unemployment or whatever). So there’s an actual dis-incentive to get a job. If you phase things out a little bit…say if you get a part time job you still get some of your benefits (the net is higher than the subsidy gets you alone), there is an incentive to find work. So instead of a hard cut off, it graduates a little bit.
As you know, I’m sure, the longer you extend unemployment benefits, the longer it takes people to find work. If you graduate it a little bit, then people will look sooner (probably) as there is an incentive to find work ahead of time to get more money.
Farm subsidies could work the same way. If you produce “too much” you don’t lose it, but it goes away as you ramp up production, but your net profits are still higher than sitting back and doing nothing.
I’m sure that made no sense at all. LOL
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 5:58 PM
They made it look easy because UCLA was so awful.
silvernana on October 22, 2010 at 5:58 PM
Artists and scientists are already on the government dole.
darwin on October 22, 2010 at 5:59 PM
NPR s/b defunded on a federal and state level. They get way more than 1-3% – this is very deceiving. Patricia Schroeder, the insufferable witch of then, did more for them than is permissible to mention.
They hide under the government umbrella and it’s time to sever the cord.
Schadenfreude on October 22, 2010 at 5:59 PM
Accepted. Thank you.
joejm65 on October 22, 2010 at 5:59 PM
I’m not calling you a bigot whatsoever. But you are the one who brought up your story in saying that you didn’t used to be frightened about this particular scenario until you were robbed.
Being more aware of your surroundings is just smart, but your comment was made in response to crr6 talking about those who are frightened about black people, and the implication of your comment in context was that after this event, your perception changed.
If that’s not what you were trying to say, then why mention the story at all? If you weren’t commenting on your change of perception with blacks, then how was your comment a relevant response to this:
Esthier on October 22, 2010 at 5:59 PM
You are a schmuck, aren’t you? Anyone who is not aware of their surroundings is an idiot. We had a slew of murders and muggings in some of the most expensive shopping areas in South Florida. Pay attention! It doesn’t make you a bigot.
katy the mean old lady on October 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM
Do you see why it’s not very persuasive to claim a comment is racist; then immediately back off when you learn who made the original comment and in its context. ;)
See Hillary. Saying “the HoR is run like a plantation” to the NAACP. On MLK day.
And you have the nerve to cry crocodile tears at me. In you’re hole, troll.
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM
You don’t get out of it that easy, sweetie.
You called him “dumb” and said something about crapping pants.
How about apologizing for that too?
And then get lost. Don’t you have 15 minutes of insurance to peddle?
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 6:01 PM
It’s as simple as them getting on with reporting news and whatnot without the almost NASCAR-like ability to turn left on any subject. If they’re going to report the news, report, don’t offer opinions or spin while reporting for the network.
john1schn on October 22, 2010 at 6:02 PM
You have a point..How did UCLA beat Texas?..:)
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 6:03 PM
Why? Where’s the serious need? NPR has said repeatedly that tax payer funds are a small portion of the money they receive.
I used to listen to Christian radio stations, and they survived just fine on listener donations. It’s certainly not impossible.
We’re ridiculously in the red right now as a nation. We need to have a good reason for every dollar we spend. I’ve never seen one for public television or radio.
Esthier on October 22, 2010 at 6:03 PM
When did I “back off?” We’re still talking about it.
lol.
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 6:04 PM
I think Joe and I are cool now, Donkey. Thanks for your concern though.
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 6:05 PM
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 6:03 PM
Texas has a lot of flaky players, a new QB and an inability to develop decent running backs.
They are continually overrated in a continually overrated conference.
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 6:05 PM
Who says they do?
Esthier on October 22, 2010 at 6:05 PM
You’re just in this little attempt to pin it on me instead of where it belongs. I’m waiting for you call hillary a racist for her comments. ;)
Mr I never make a typo, right? ;)
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 6:06 PM
I already responded to this. Twice. If my posts don’t make sense to you, just ignore them and move on.
joejm65 on October 22, 2010 at 6:06 PM
I’m livid over his treatment, but I believe in public broadcasting, I do. I just don’t know how to reconcile those beliefs.
ernesto on October 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM
Welcome to Juan’s world !
He’s just figuring it out, too.
pambi on October 22, 2010 at 6:06 PM
Ooooooo…..crr6 made a boo boo.
That must have been the slapping sound I heard earlier.
Bishop on October 22, 2010 at 6:06 PM
Hey now. We don’t need to add Big 12 bashing to this thread. Go Tigers!
alwaysfiredup on October 22, 2010 at 6:07 PM
They do. Let’s not deny reality. Everyone likes their candy. Ask any conservative farmer about his subsidies and he’ll swear up and down he needs them.
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 6:07 PM
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 6:05 PM
I’m concerned about your career.
How many sham wows did you sell during the last commercial break?
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 6:07 PM
I don’t think folks would mind funding public broadcasting, if it represented all thoughts, and ideas. If it catered to both sides of the aisle, and more. But it doesn’t. It leans left, reports left, and is a liberal entity now.
Add to that, the fact that Mr.Williams was fired for expressing a feeling…without regard to the entire context of the conversation is revealing. This outfit has no room for individual thoughts, or expression, and want to quell freedom of speech. They fired the man for expressing himself. That’s truly sad, and very telling.
I don’t believe liberalism is the answer to anything. I’m a conservative, and I don’t feel any of my tax dollars should go to fund a liberal entity, that feels it needs to put a kibosh on freedom of speech. It’s as simple as that. For me.
capejasmine on October 22, 2010 at 6:07 PM
Poor crr6. She has missed the Axelturf marching orders from HQ to “lean forward” and not lean so far backward nor twist herself into a pretzel in order to excuse the NPR thought police.
onlineanalyst on October 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM
That is no way to refer to your lawyer..:)
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM
This is it’s future.
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM
alwaysfiredup on October 22, 2010 at 6:07 PM
Nebraska is ours!
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 6:09 PM
You can have ‘em. We’ve already beaten them to a nice pulp for you. :)
alwaysfiredup on October 22, 2010 at 6:09 PM
You didn’t. You’ve explained that you weren’t being a racist, which I didn’t assume you were being, but you didn’t explain why that comment fit in with hers.
You obviously don’t have to, but I don’t see anything offensive in my asking you to. Feel free to educate me on that if you wish.
I guess that’s just for me then. I don’t see any value in them, and I wasn’t the only one in this thread to say so, but that’s not proof that any but two of us feel this way. Guess I haven’t spoken to any conservatives on this issue really.
Esthier on October 22, 2010 at 6:10 PM
They (Texas) looked good against Nebraska..Plus OU Sooners are #1..I think the Big 12 is doing ok..:)
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 6:10 PM
lol again.
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 6:11 PM
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM
That is a riot.
I refuse to believe the law school story. People in law school do not have time to blow on threads like this, at this point in the fall term.
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 6:12 PM
Have you watched that video? Any thoughts on it? Seriously.
lorien1973 on October 22, 2010 at 6:12 PM
Its fun watching stupid people learn something.
Inanemergencydial on October 22, 2010 at 6:13 PM
I see you’ve never been a 2L with a job lined up.
What do you do for a living though? I’m curious.
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 6:13 PM
Dire Straits on October 22, 2010 at 6:10 PM
It’s all in fun, I moved to Texas a year and a half ago and it’s all I hear about it.
I have no room to talk because my Nittany Lions (Nittaly to Barack) are truly awful this year.
NoDonkey on October 22, 2010 at 6:14 PM
Yeah, there was a headlines item on it a couple days ago. I posted a bunch on it. I think it’s hilarious.
crr6 on October 22, 2010 at 6:14 PM
crr6
Tell me Please, if you were lost almost out of gas and your cell phone was dead, you see a public phone on a corner with a group of men nearby drinking and smoking. Would you get out and use the phone or would you drive on?
Only one answer is politically correct
Gwillie on October 22, 2010 at 6:15 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »