Conyers: Lame duck session will investigate Karl Rove

posted at 11:36 am on October 5, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

John Conyers addressed a progressive activist group this past weekend and tried to find some way to energize the base. The 111th Congress has done little for anyone to cheer, of course, with the progressives unhappy that ObamaCare didn’t contain a public-option Trojan horse for an eventual single-payer plan, and everyone else unhappy about ObamaCare in general.  What better way to get some love from the audience than to promise an investigation into the single biggest menace facing America?  Would that be joblessness, capital flight, national security, or the federal deficit?  No, it’s something much, much more malevolent:

Great idea, Congressman.  What better way to bring an end to a laughably inept Congress than to have it investigate someone not in government, not lobbying government, without a single idea of why an investigation is needed?  “Karl Rove is at it again, and I think we ought to take a new look at him,” Conyers says, but never explains what “it” is.  Oh, wait, it’s mischief.  I seem to recall the “mischief” clause of the Constitution that gives Congress the authority to just start probes of private citizens because some members don’t like them.  Lord knows there isn’t anything else Congress could be doing — like, say, actually doing its Constitutional duty and exercising some oversight over the executive branch.

Or, heck, maybe we can even get an investigation into House members who bounce checks to the government.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Just one more reason we need to clean house. I’m sick and tired of these hypocrites and their claptrap. Conyers, I hope your name is on the list of those who need investigating, come January!

capejasmine on October 5, 2010 at 2:43 PM

Vote Rep. Conyers OUT OF OFFICE!

Don Ukrainec is the Republican candidate who is running against Democrat Rep. John Conyers.

Learn more about Don Ukrainec at his campaign website:

http://www.don4change.com/index.html

wren on October 5, 2010 at 3:00 PM

HA historians & Constitutional scholars:
Did the US Congresses of the late 18th century have lame-duck sessions?
Aren’t lame-duck sessions unConstitutional in that some of the members can be unaccountable & prone to vindictiveness due to recent electoral defeat?

itsnotaboutme on October 5, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Conyers to Issa: Call off the dogs or Rove gets it!

Issa to Conyers: You put one of ours in the hospital…

Ace ODale on October 5, 2010 at 4:13 PM

A budget would be nice, Mr. Conyers, or even a start on one…

mojo on October 5, 2010 at 5:15 PM

The man is certifiable.

mojo on October 5, 2010 at 5:18 PM

What better way to bring an end to a laughably inept Congress than to have it investigate someone not in government, not lobbying government, without a single idea of why an investigation is needed?

Conyers couldn’t even see that his wife was corrupt (She is now inmate #123456) how is this incompetent boob going to find anything?

DSchoen on October 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM

Conyers to Issa: Call off the dogs or Rove gets it!
Issa to Conyers: You put one of ours in the hospital…
Ace ODale on October 5, 2010 at 4:13 PM

Issa to Conyers: So exactly how did you not Know your wife was taking bribes?
Monica Conyers, the wife of veteran Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), was sentenced in federal court Wednesday to 37 months in prison.

Mrs. Conyers, a former Detroit City Councilwoman, was sentenced to 37 months and two years of supervised probation after being convicted last year of bribery charges

The congressman has consistently avoided questions about his wife’s legal woes, a matter which could extend into the future after Mrs. Conyers reportedly vowed, angrily, to appeal her sentence.

DSchoen on October 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM

Who are the dummys that continue to vote for this low life? Sounds like he’s asleep at the switch.

regmgr on October 5, 2010 at 6:30 PM

Gee, I think in the 11 minutes that the “Democrat” Congress will have left in its majority after the elections, Rove should probably feel safe ignoring the subpoenas.

seanrobins on October 5, 2010 at 10:48 PM

Considering we are close to an election, how about investigating that cheesedoodle Holder and why he let the NBPP off the hook on voter intimidation?

91Veteran on October 5, 2010 at 11:23 PM

Comment pages: 1 2