Too bad to check: Miller 38, Murkowski 36, McAdams 22

posted at 5:33 pm on September 29, 2010 by Allahpundit

I hope Dick Morris and Sean Trende are right about the GOP winning 100 seats in November. Because if Murky pulls this one out, that’s how big the wave will have to be to ease the pain.

A CNN/Time/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Wednesday indicates that 38 percent of likely voters in the state support GOP nominee Joe Miller, with 36 percent saying they back Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who was narrowly defeated by Miller in last month’s GOP primary…

“It looks like Alaska Democrats may be planning to do some strategic voting,” CNN Polling Director Keating Holland said.

Nearly four in ten Democratic likely voters say they plan to write in Murkowski’s name. That’s an indication that a lot of Democrats are more interested in defeating Miller than they are in electing a member of their own party.”

Murkowski’s support is high among women, lower-income voters, and senior citizens – all groups that give her 43 percent of their vote.

Polls of this race are tricky twice over, once because Alaska is notoriously difficult to gauge and twice because the nature of Murkowski’s candidacy poses a dilemma for the pollster. Do you do it the way Scott Rasmussen does it, offering respondents a choice between Miller and McAdams to reflect the choices on the ballot and letting them volunteer Murkowski’s name instead? Or do you name all three candidates and ask if respondents will be “writing in” Murkowski? Rasmussen’s way is more accurate, I think; CNN, however, chose the second way, which might explain why they have Murkowski polling nine points better than Rasmussen does. Then again, Murky’s been doing a lot of national media lately, and her write-in ads have ramped up since Rasmussen did his survey eight days ago. Could simply be that she’s gaining. And that Miller’s now in a dogfight.

If these numbers are right then Democrats will soon face the same dilemma in Alaska that they face in Florida with Meek and Crist. Not only is the independent candidate in the race an incumbent with high name recognition, but she’s simply killing their nominee among the Democratic base, where they need every vote. At what point will prominent Alaska Dems decide McAdams is a lost cause and start peeling off towards Murkowski in the name of defeating Miller? Gulp.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I really despise this woman

Cookies Mom on September 29, 2010 at 5:35 PM

I don’t think there is any chance she gets anywhere near 40% of the voters to write in her name.

Clark1 on September 29, 2010 at 5:36 PM

Oh lordy…..

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:36 PM

Too bad to check: Miller Palin 38, Murkowski 36, McAdams 22

This is what we’re really looking at here.

Mark1971 on September 29, 2010 at 5:36 PM

You are drinking if you thinking this poll is accurate.

CWforFreedom on September 29, 2010 at 5:36 PM

Let’s hope this is a far-out outlier poll.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:37 PM

I don’t think there is any chance she gets anywhere near 40% of the voters to write in her name.

Clark1 on September 29, 2010 at 5:36 PM

Those supposed Dems will peel off as we get closer and quit lying to these pollsters.

CWforFreedom on September 29, 2010 at 5:37 PM

Let’s hope this is a far-out outlier poll.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:37 PM

Are you becoming more con?

CWforFreedom on September 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM

Revenge of the RINOs. And not just Murskanki.

Cicero43 on September 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM

Bed wetter time…

winston on September 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM

CNN, however, chose the second way, which might explain why they have Murkowski polling nine points better than Rasmussen does.

Which is one of the reasons why Rasmussen has credibility and CNN does not. Anyone who worries that Miller will be defeated must be desperate for something to worry about.

Luka on September 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM

For a write-in candidate?

“I think you over-estimate their chances”

Skywise on September 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM

At what point will prominent Alaska Dems decide McAdams is a lost cause and start peeling off towards Murkowski in the name of defeating Miller? Gulp.

Let ‘em. If Murky wins they’ll reap what they sow. The entire Congress will be going more conservative and if Murky wants to get along she’ll have to go along.

darwin on September 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM

Nearly four in ten Democratic likely voters say they plan to write in Murkowski’s name.

they PLAN…thats the operative word, they PLAN on doing it. Will they? Well, us married folk know the answer to that.

MikeInBA on September 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM

Can anybody in Alaska let us know what is happening there?

Tasha on September 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM

Wow. Good thing she’s still the ranking member of the Energy Committee, right?

KingGold on September 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM

Gulp.

???

Maybe it has been the interesting background of Miller lately? You don’t say you won’t take Federal Subs and come to find out you took Federal Subs.. and maybe more. Or the fact the Tea Party Express came up on a AK cruise which made most of the Conservatives say.. is this a vacation or an election? Or how about McAdam’s past isn’t all that great as he takes more pork than ANYONE in Alaska? Sitka isn’t exactly known as the non-Pork-town and even the people on his own team do not want to deal with him because he is a slob.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM

If she wins, and then jumps to the Dems (after all, they would have brought her back from the political dead), then I say that we serve roasted Hatch for dinner. Not because it will be in “good taste,” but because it will taste good.

beatcanvas on September 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM

Yeah, but can 36% of voters spell her name correctly?

txhsmom on September 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM

Are you becoming more con?

CWforFreedom on September 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM

Ann is what the thread requires her to be.

lorien1973 on September 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Can anybody in Alaska let us know what is happening there?

Tasha on September 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM

I am not from Alaska but I suggest you stick with Rasmussen.

CWforFreedom on September 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Write in campaigns are hard because when people see the ballat they forget they have athird choice.

i’ve been saying it will be
40% to miller
35% lisa
25% adams

unseen on September 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM

She can only campaign until she runs out of money. I doubt the GOP donors she’s stolen money from are going to write any more checks.

joe_doufu on September 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

CNN/Time poll?

d1carter on September 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

How are these polls conducted? To be accurate, Lizelle Mercowskey should not be an option on the poll. Individuals should bring her up on their own.

El_Terrible on September 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

Allah, you worry too much.

ButterflyDragon on September 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

The poll of all voters indicates a preference for the actual conservative Republican choice and then second place goes to the less conservative Republican. How is this bad news again?

TWG78 on September 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

Polls shape opinion…

Yes Minister on opinion polls…

tetriskid on September 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

I’m not buying it. If her supporters were this engaged why did she lose in the first place? How many people will actually support an incumbent sore loser?

Guardian on September 29, 2010 at 5:43 PM

That Princess Lisa ad is spectacular.

IronDioPriest on September 29, 2010 at 5:43 PM

this is a CNN/Time poll…the two LEAST trusted names in news.

they released several polls today and they are ALL outlyers!!

Justrand on September 29, 2010 at 5:43 PM

I hope Dick Morris and Sean Trende are right about the GOP winning 100 seats in November.

Dick Morris did not say the Republicans would win 100 seats in November.

Luka on September 29, 2010 at 5:44 PM

Interesting happy tidbit:

By Alaska election law, the write-ins are not even considered unless the total number of write-ins is greater than the total number of votes for the first-place ballot finisher.

In other words, for McCloskey it’s first-place or zero.

KingGold on September 29, 2010 at 5:44 PM

Dick Morris is an attention whore.

Mark1971 on September 29, 2010 at 5:45 PM

If ‘rats are voting for Turdkowski then that is all I need to know.

Lesson for you, GOP, if you don’t squash this bug it will come back to haunt you. The next primary loser might be the Tea Party candidate who decides to steal votes from YOUR chosen one.

Bishop on September 29, 2010 at 5:45 PM

She has racked up some important in-state endorsements and if some Dems split, this could be accurate.

Worse news for Miller is that she has two Ted Stevens ads in the can made just before he died.

swamp_yankee on September 29, 2010 at 5:45 PM

Anyone who worries that Miller will be defeated must be desperate for something to worry about.
Luka on September 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM

Isn’t that the definition of a….eeyore????

joejm65 on September 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM

The CNN/Time/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted Sept. 24-28, with 1,528 adults, including 927 likely voters in Alaska, questioned by telephone. The survey’s sampling error is plus or minus three percentage points for likely voters.

Of course their sampling does not take into account what percentage of GOP/IND/DEM that they polled.

If they polled it 38GOP/25IND/37DEM, their results would be very skewed. I would say the Demographics in AK are closer to 45GOP/25IND/30DEM.

Taking that into account, I would say it is closer to 45Miller/30Murky/25McAdmans

ConservativePartyNow on September 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM

CNN wanted to get them some Murky-mentum, and of course AP falls for it right off the bat.

By the way, anyone happy with the GOP Senate Caucus right now?

Not only did they not strip Murklinskie of her energy seat, they now seem to be trying to punish Jim DeMint.

According to NRO, Sessions, Inhofe, and Vitter were the only ones on the record against Merclanky, with DeMint.

2012 Senate, there will be blood.

Brian1972 on September 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM

Murkowsi (murr-KOW-skee) – noun; see also ‘unprincipled beeyotch’

Midas on September 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM

Ann is what the thread requires her to be.

lorien1973 on September 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Nailed it.

ladyingray on September 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM

I really despise this woman

Cookies Mom on September 29, 2010 at 5:35 PM

with you sister…she lost fair and square, pathetic…

cmsinaz on September 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM

Ah, but is the poll “gruesome?”

/s

cs89 on September 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM

Bishop on September 29, 2010 at 5:45 PM

Umm Bishop. The point to this is that it isn’t Repub against Dem. It is Dems working with Repubs working with Indies and so on. It is a very odd mix. And anything Miller does (or any other political party) goes against Murkowski, it is going to backfire.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM

CNN/Time poll?

d1carter on September 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

Must be a mind reader. I was thinking the same thing. HA!

RMR on September 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM

Is Murkowski’s baggage figuring in at all? Or do Alaskans overall not view her negatively? Btw–how’s the local media playing this out? Have they picked sides?

conservative pilgrim on September 29, 2010 at 5:48 PM

Dick Morris did not say the Republicans would win 100 seats in November.

Luka on September 29, 2010 at 5:44 PM

He said the GOP should campaign for 100 seats.

ladyingray on September 29, 2010 at 5:48 PM

I don’t think she will break 25% in actuality.

sharrukin on September 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM

It’s not surprising, by the way, that many of the recent polls are showing tightening races. That generally tends to happen around the end of September/early October because most “normal” people really don’t focus on the November elections until that time. This poll may just be an indication of that phenomena (sic?)

Jimbo3 on September 29, 2010 at 5:50 PM

Are you becoming more con?

CWforFreedom on September 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM

Until you discuss social issues. *haha

Or the Clintons. :)

Yes, I’m pretty convinced that the teaparty people are just what we really need. We need ground-up, not elitists, for a change.

Ground-up is going to make mistakes, but we need to get back to actually having voters in charge. It’s worth the risk.

We’re in too much trouble to quibble at this point.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:50 PM

where is upinak? thoughts my friend?

cmsinaz on September 29, 2010 at 5:50 PM

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM

That’s a lot of working going on, the national GOP doesn’t seem overly interested in making life difficult for Murkowski.

BUT…this is a poll, and from CNN no less, so I’ll just have to wait until November to see how it all shakes out. I don’t trust the GOP that much farther than the demorat party, they have a lot of trust to gain back.

Bishop on September 29, 2010 at 5:51 PM

Ann is what the thread requires her to be.

lorien1973 on September 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM

whatever that means….

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:51 PM

While you gnashing your teeth over this one, check out all of the other CNN/TIME poll results today. It’s amazing! Dems are leading or tied in just about all of them.

And, if you believe that, I have some beautiful, ocean-front property in Arizona to sell you!

GoldenEagle4444 on September 29, 2010 at 5:51 PM

I’m not buying it. If her supporters were this engaged why did she lose in the first place? How many people will actually support an incumbent sore loser?

Guardian on September 29, 2010 at 5:43 PM

This makes the most sense.

tru2tx on September 29, 2010 at 5:52 PM

While you gnashing your teeth over this one, check out all of the other CNN/TIME poll results today. It’s amazing! Dems are leading or tied in just about all of them.

And, if you believe that, I have some beautiful, ocean-front property in Arizona to sell you!

GoldenEagle4444 on September 29, 2010 at 5:51 PM

True. I think we’re hitting the silly season with polling.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:53 PM

This reminds me of that time the Governor of Florida skipped the primary and went straight to the general, and the first poll had him ahead of Rubio by three points.

Naturally, Allah crapped his pants and cried in his beer.

Others had a longer view, and look where we are now in that race.

Give Merklankinski some time to alienate people by abandoning everything she stood for in the past, and she will drop like a stone. People want authenticity now, not phony posturing. Say what you mean and mean what you say.

Brian1972 on September 29, 2010 at 5:53 PM

Febrile people shouldn’t run political blogs.

rayra on September 29, 2010 at 5:54 PM

I’ll trust Ras

LurkerDood on September 29, 2010 at 5:54 PM

Historically, candidate who run as write-in get a boost from the novelty. Don’t think that it actually applies to the expected turnout.

MadisonConservative on September 29, 2010 at 5:54 PM

Is Murkowski’s baggage figuring in at all? Or do Alaskans overall not view her negatively? Btw–how’s the local media playing this out? Have they picked sides?

conservative pilgrim on September 29, 2010 at 5:48 PM

Not sure what you mean by baggage? Everyone has it.. are you talking her overall voting record or her Father?

The Media picked McAdams (surprise) BUT since Murkowski and Miller are fighting… even though Murkowski isn’t bothering with Miller and is not doing the attack ads on him. So the Media is playing devils advocate.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:54 PM

Let’s get donating to Miller!!

texasconserv on September 29, 2010 at 5:55 PM

Only a moron would take this poll serious. Having three choices is not the same as having two choices and having to write-in a third choice.

WoosterOh on September 29, 2010 at 5:55 PM

That ad about her screaming that she deserves the seat really didn’t strike me as smart, though.

Jeesh* People cringe at that direct type of a screech ad.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:55 PM

The “True Moderate” wing of the party smile with joy.

portlandon on September 29, 2010 at 5:55 PM

I don’t think she will break 25% in actuality.

sharrukin on September 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM

Me neither. But let’s have the Dems believe she is their hope of beating Miller. So far, that strategy is working perfectly:

Nearly four in ten Democratic likely voters say they plan to write in Murkowski’s name.

Election Day Prediction:

Miller 55%
Murky-biatch 20%
McAdams 20%
Others 5%

Norwegian on September 29, 2010 at 5:55 PM

What the poll really shows is that the DemocRAT doesn’t stand a chance. I don’t see that many people writing in a name. Don’t think there is any way that Miller doesn’t win.

It is legal to do what she is doing but doesn’t seem very smart to go against the will of the Republicans in the primary.

PhiKapMom on September 29, 2010 at 5:56 PM

Let’s get donating to Miller!!

texasconserv on September 29, 2010 at 5:55 PM

Is he actually hurting for money?

I doubt it. I think this is going to come down to his own personal campaigning skills. He seems pretty competent. He’s as good as she is, for sure.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:56 PM

Governors appointing their daughters to serve out their terms is the closest thing to royal privilege this country has come in a long, long time. Murkowsky’s decision validates every Republican who voted against her in the primary, since she demonstrates that she’d sell them out at the first opportunity.

Lawrence Talbot on September 29, 2010 at 5:56 PM

Rasmussen – THE MOST ACCURATE POLLING ORGANIZATION, ELECTION AFTER ELECTION – has Miller at +15.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/ak/alaska_senate_miller_vs_mcadams_vs_murkowski-1700.html

rayra on September 29, 2010 at 5:57 PM

Yes, it’s another thumbs down to the Dems there. They really hoped she’d split the GOP ticket.

Oh well!

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 5:57 PM

Quit yer bitchin’. Donate to Miller. You don’t have to be from Alaska, you know.

tgillian on September 29, 2010 at 5:57 PM

Bishop on September 29, 2010 at 5:51 PM

I know. But a lot of people aren’t happy with the tea party express at the moment and it has been a weird election for sure.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:58 PM

She can only campaign until she runs out of money. I doubt the GOP donors she’s stolen money from are going to write any more checks.

joe_doufu on September 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

Unfortunately, it is going to be a long time before “she who must not be named” runs out of campaign money.

According to the FEC.gov website http://www.fec.gov/DisclosureSearch/HSRefreshCandList.do?category=stateS_all&stateName=AK&election_yr=2010

As of 8/4/10

“She” had Cash on Hand = $1,868,429

Republican Joe Miller had Cash on Hand = $84,204 (Although I am sure Joe Miller has raised significantly more money since his victory in the Primary.)

Democrat Scott McAdams had Cash on Hand = $5,663

wren on September 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM

Let’s get donating to Miller!!

texasconserv on September 29, 2010 at 5:55 PM

Which will totally set into motion what Murkowski AND McAdams already have said in Ads. OUT OF STATE ENDORSMENTS. They are not going well up here. Think Don Young.

You want Miller to lose. PLEASE send money!

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM

Interesting happy tidbit:

By Alaska election law, the write-ins are not even considered unless the total number of write-ins is greater than the total number of votes for the first-place ballot finisher.

In other words, for McCloskey it’s first-place or zero.

KingGold on September 29, 2010 at 5:44 PM

errr…what? So in other words, you can’t win unless you win?

Here’s another way to put it. Candidate A got more votes than candidate B. Candidate B’s votes don’t count toward his win, because candidate A got more votes and won…

Kelligan on September 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM

Alaskans do not like Outsiders, which is Millers worst enemy at this point. Alaskans also don’t like people telling them what to do. Which also hurts Miller.

With as much anger I have a Murkowski, she might just be able to pull this off as a big Middle finger to the lower 48.

portlandon on September 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM

I’ll try again. Stop complaining and donate to Miller. You don’t have to be from Alaska.

tgillian on September 29, 2010 at 6:01 PM

I suspect Alaska just isn’t a state where dropping money bombs makes much of a difference.

He just has to settle down and start retail politicking.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 6:01 PM

With as much anger I have a Murkowski, she might just be able to pull this off as a big Middle finger to the lower 48.

portlandon on September 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM

port. Hey now, I warned everyone! Let them figure it out.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 6:01 PM

Alaskans do not like Outsiders, which is Millers worst enemy at this point. Alaskans also don’t like people telling them what to do. Which also hurts Miller.

With as much anger I have a Murkowski, she might just be able to pull this off as a big Middle finger to the lower 48.

portlandon on September 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM

That makes sense to me. I think he can overcome this.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 6:02 PM

I’ll try again. Stop complaining and donate to Miller. You don’t have to be from Alaska.

tgillian on September 29, 2010 at 6:01 PM

And I will say it again. Donate to Miller and watch him lose due to your pushing on something you have no control over.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 6:02 PM

Hasn’t there only been one Senator ever to win a seat as a write in candidate? I also seem to recall seeing a poll at HA showing that Crist was going to beat Rubio in Florida.

Hera on September 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM

I want to know more about her Kenai River land deal. Did Lisa really profit $40,000 when she and her husband were forced to give back the land? Did she really get an earmark to pave the road to the property?

I read about it yesterday at RedState, but the Anchorage Daily News hasn’t written a word about this new information. If this is true, I believe she is toast.

TeleL on September 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM

TeleL on September 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM

No, she got back exactly what she bought it for. No one made any money. Where did you learn or hear this?

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 6:04 PM

I really hate that woman. That said, I find this poll difficult to believe…that many are going to take the time to write in her name? And who has the energy on their side? Not the sore loser, or the Dem.

I think I’ll send Mr. Miller some money.

changer1701 on September 29, 2010 at 6:04 PM

Holy Cow…that shot of her…it’s Emperor Palpatine without the hood!!!

dont taze me bro on September 29, 2010 at 6:05 PM

I think Miller’s message is a very tough sell, actually. He needs to reassure voters that he’s not so draconian that he’d put them out on the ice floes.

Seriously.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 6:07 PM

You want Miller to lose. PLEASE send money!

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM

That makes NO sense whatsoever. It was Alaskan GOPers who chose Miller over Murkowski…the outsiders weren’t the one’s going to the polls. And we’re to believe the other candidates aren’t getting outside support?

Discouraging people from sending him money is counter-productive.

changer1701 on September 29, 2010 at 6:08 PM

Discouraging people from sending him money is counter-productive.

changer1701 on September 29, 2010 at 6:08 PM

No, it is COMPLETELY counter productive to you.

Read what portlandon wrote, he at least gets it:

Alaskans do not like Outsiders, which is Millers worst enemy at this point. Alaskans also don’t like people telling them what to do. Which also hurts Miller.

With as much anger I have a Murkowski, she might just be able to pull this off as a big Middle finger to the lower 48.

portlandon on September 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM

Send money… watch Miller burn. That is all there is too it.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 6:10 PM

You want Miller to lose. PLEASE send money!

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM

Do you support Miller, or Murkowski?

sharrukin on September 29, 2010 at 6:10 PM

Quick! Dump more money into the unwinnable Delaware Senate race!

It's Vintage, Duh on September 29, 2010 at 6:11 PM

No, if he needs money, he’ll hollar.

I think the advice here could be very right. And frankly, if he can’t hollar, then there may be something off about him anyway.

He needs to ask. But I can’t imagine AK as being a bought type state in campaigns, anyway.

This is a retail campaign state. Sell your ideas, but make it personal. He does sometimes sound a bit lofty to me, anyway. She sounds as dumb as a box of rocks, by contrast. But she does talk about people.

He’s sort of sounds stuck in ideology.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 6:13 PM

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM

thank you…you are in the thick of it there…

cmsinaz on September 29, 2010 at 6:13 PM

He simply needs to grow as a candidate. Let’s not watch his every move.

It’s intimidating.

AnninCA on September 29, 2010 at 6:13 PM

Send money… watch Miller burn. That is all there is too it.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 6:10 PM

I suppose Lisa’s desperate calls around to DC lobbyists doesn’t count as out of state support for her then.

Brian1972 on September 29, 2010 at 6:14 PM

No, she got back exactly what she bought it for. No one made any money. Where did you learn or hear this?

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 6:04 PM

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/09/28/lisa-murkowski-profits-in-office/

TeleL on September 29, 2010 at 6:14 PM

Do you support Miller, or Murkowski?

sharrukin on September 29, 2010 at 6:10 PM

I do not support Miller.. never have. I don’t like Murkowski.

It doesn’t matter who I like, I am voting republican.

upinak on September 29, 2010 at 6:14 PM

Can anybody in Alaska let us know what is happening there?

Tasha on September 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM

I am not from Alaska but I suggest you stick with Rasmussen.

CWforFreedom on September 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM

It would be nice to hear from boots on the ground if you don’t mind.

Tasha on September 29, 2010 at 6:15 PM

Keep posting that pic – Murkowski’s ‘great white maw’ – that outta’ scare the seniors to Miller. . . .

karra on September 29, 2010 at 6:17 PM

Comment pages: 1 2