New “credible” terror threat has CIA bombarding Pakistan jihadis with drone strikes; Update: Plot “severely disrupted”

posted at 7:41 pm on September 28, 2010 by Allahpundit

At least 20 separate strikes in 28 days this month so far, an unprecedented pace. And it’s paid off: According to Bill Roggio, a missile attack a few days ago might have killed Al Qaeda’s new operational commander in Pakistan. Follow the first link to the Journal and you’ll find only a few bare details about the terror plot they’re trying to disrupt — the main target is Europe, the Haqqani network in Afghanistan might be involved, but very little beyond that. Luckily, ABC has been digging and has new info:

US and European officials said Tuesday they have detected a plot to carry out a major, coordinated series of new terror attacks in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and possibly the United States…

Intelligence and law enforcement authorities in the US and Europe said the threat information is based on the interrogation of a suspected German terrorist allegedly captured on his way to Europe in late summer and now being held at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan.

US law enforcement officials say they have been told the terrorists were planning a series of “Mumbai-style” commando raids on what were termed “economic or soft” targets in the countries…

The captured German reportedly said several teams of attackers, all with European passports, had been trained and dispatched from training camps in Waziristan and Pakistan. Officials say the German claimed the attack plan had been approved by Osama Bin Laden.

Why is the U.S. worried about a plot involving German jihadis? Because, as ABC notes, German citizens don’t need a visa to enter the U.S. The Bagram prisoner who tipped them to the plot is reportedly a jihadi named Ahmad with ties to the same mosque in Hamburg patronized by some of the 9/11 hijackers and only recently shut down by German authorities. He was allegedly picked up in early July — and yet only in the past few weeks has the CIA ramped up the drone attacks in Pakistan. Is that because Ahmad didn’t spill the beans about the attack until recently or was it only within the last few weeks that some sort of corroborating evidence was discovered suggesting that things might be in motion?

There’s not much else to say for now, but I’m putting it on your radar screen in so that you have some context if you hear about any terror scares in Europe over the next few days. Like, for instance, this one. If you can spare the time, it’s also worth reading this NYT report on the newly ramped-up drone campaign, as it offers an altogether different motive for the strikes. The “terror threat” theory is that an attack might be moving forward and thus it’s crucial to disrupt communications by forcing jihadi commanders to go to ground. The Times’s theory is that Petraeus has lost patience with Pakistan’s promises to attack the Taliban’s safe havens across the border and is enlisting the CIA to help do the job that Islamabad won’t do. There’s a little tidbit about a terror threat buried way down in the article, but it’s almost an afterthought compared to the broader strategic goal of debilitating the Taliban vis-a-vis their capacities in Afghanistan. Exit question: Could the feds be emphasizing the terror-plot angle in order to justify escalating the drone campaign over Pakistani objections? It’s one thing to say we need to go all-out across the border because it serves our war ends, it’s another to say we need to do it as an emergency defensive measure because we’re facing an imminent attack. Pakistan will complain either way, but the second reason makes it easier to ignore them than the first.

Update: Sky News corroborates ABC’s report and claims that sources are saying the plot’s been “severely disrupted” — they think.

Sky’s foreign affairs editor Tim Marshall said militants based in Pakistan were planning simultaneous strikes on London and major cities in France and Germany.

He said the plan was in the advanced but not imminent stage and the plotters had been tracked by spy agencies “for some time”…

Marshall said the European plot had been “severly disrupted” following intelligence sharing between Britain, France, Germany and the US.

It is not known whether the attackers are already in Europe.

According to Marshall, “several” of the masterminds behind the plot have been killed by drone strikes.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

October surprise?

sandee on September 28, 2010 at 7:45 PM

Dear President Obama,

Thank you for continuing the fight against these savages. Keep it up.

Kafir on September 28, 2010 at 7:45 PM

Capital punishment without even a show trial./

CWforFreedom on September 28, 2010 at 7:46 PM

Wait… Germans who might be Terrorists?

Naaaa, they won’t attack anyone… errr… oops.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM


… a missile attack a few days ago might have killed Al Qaeda’s new operational commander …

Another “Number 3″ bites it?

Tony737 on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

All joking about “Slow News days” and puff pieces, I’ll take them over reports of Terrorist attacks.

These Strikes are killing people that we might want to question. I hope they are catching enough of these scum alive to get some good Intel.

portlandon on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

Didn’t the democrats scream that Bush was politicizing terror? It’ll be interesting to see their reaction to this.

It’s also very interesting to me that manboychild said we could “absorb” another attack.

SouthernGent on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

so, are we merely thinning out the number of newly created terrorists that George Bush created…? I kid I kid…

great rundown AP. It makes sense that AQ and haqqani’s network start going after lower hanging fruit targets such as shopping malls (read Clancy’s Rainbow Six), hospitals, schools and such. They are easier hits and psychologically damaging.

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:48 PM

It’s also very interesting to me that manboychild said we could “absorb” another attack.

SouthernGent on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

He sees the Intel. Maybe Professor Barry is giving us a Foreshadowing of what is to come.

portlandon on September 28, 2010 at 7:49 PM

All joking about “Slow News days” and puff pieces, I’ll take them over reports of Terrorist attacks.

These Strikes are killing people that we might want to question. I hope they are catching enough of these scum alive to get some good Intel.

portlandon on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

Port just remember, the Dems were MAD AS HELL when O wouldn’t stop the airstrikes via the drones, as O promised. This is about the ONLY thing I will give O credit for.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 7:49 PM

The recent hot pursuit border incursion also has Pakistan threatening to refuse to protect supply convoys in transit to Afghanistan.

Skandia Recluse on September 28, 2010 at 7:49 PM

The recent hot pursuit border incursion also has Pakistan threatening to refuse to protect supply convoys in transit to Afghanistan.

Skandia Recluse on September 28, 2010 at 7:49 PM

They do that, they would possibly lose all US funding.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 7:50 PM

Another “Number 3″ bites it?

Tony737 on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

I think this is operational commander version 3.0. The original ops commander was …Hamza Rabia

An American counterterrorism official called the killing “a major blow” to Al Qaeda, saying that the man, Hamza Rabia, had served in recent months as the organization’s top planner for external operations, including those directed at the United States. Pakistani officials said he was regarded as the commander of Arab fighters hiding in the tribal areas.

Rabia was killed in December 2005 via airstrike.

They have now gone through at least 2-3 other jihadbot commanders since that time.

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:51 PM

War criminal!

The left will be takin’ it to the streets to speak truth to power in 5… 4… 3… oh, nevermind.

mankai on September 28, 2010 at 7:51 PM

Port just remember, the Dems were MAD AS HELL when O wouldn’t stop the airstrikes via the drones, as O promised. This is about the ONLY thing I will give O credit for.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 7:49 PM

I know. The Libtards want peace at the cost of our own lives.

If Barry is killing terrorists, I’m good with it.

However his wishy-washy libtard pandering during election season puts our troops in harms way, and that I won’t forgive him for.

portlandon on September 28, 2010 at 7:52 PM

I tell you what, if I were President Obama, I’d be slinging hash and busting open caves with Hellfires too right now. If he caps Zawahiri and/or Bin Laden…. then the POTUS stock is going to rise, there ain’t no two ways to slice it.

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:52 PM

Will we maintain a drone presence in Afghanistan once we remove combat troops next year?

BKeyser on September 28, 2010 at 7:52 PM


“Mumbai-style” commando raids

Which is what many of us have been predicting since 9/11. These cowards wanna go after easy targets, like malls and schools (Beslan).

Tony737 on September 28, 2010 at 7:52 PM

However his wishy-washy libtard pandering during election season puts our troops in harms way, and that I won’t forgive him for.

portlandon on September 28, 2010 at 7:52 PM

That isn’t ever going to change. And I wouldn’t pee on him if he was on fire for screwing over our troops.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM

Distractions?

RedNewEnglander on September 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM

New “credible” terror threat

OMG, we’d better delay elections! /s

FloatingRock on September 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM

It’s also very interesting to me that manboychild said we could “absorb” another attack.

SouthernGent on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

Very good SG… Very curios indeed…

Keemo on September 28, 2010 at 7:54 PM

President Obama,

Thank you for continuing the fight against these savages. Keep it up.

Kafir on September 28, 2010 at 7:45 PM

Ditto that, except I can’t come to terms on the DEAR part.

fourdeucer on September 28, 2010 at 7:54 PM

the antiwar left is increasingly marginalized. They are only useful if you or I were president, and it shows. Right now, they are a mere hindrance, a speedbump, and getting in the way of the validation of the One’s drone thumpin’ ways around the world. Have you seen that the FBI is like rounding up a bunch of antiwar activists in/around Minneapolis IIRC? Ed may have more on that sometime….but it’s pretty funny how the antiwar left is glorified during R administrations and treated as a bunch of beeotches during an Obama administration…

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:55 PM

I’ll bet the jihadis are relatively immobile thanks to all those floods. Squash them whenever possible.

OhioCoastie on September 28, 2010 at 7:55 PM

So, I can’t lose the entire Dem party, but will the military industrial complex vote for me if I buy and use all these cool drones and missiles on the Jonas Brothers Jihadis?

/BHO

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:56 PM

According to Marshall, “several” of the masterminds behind the plot have been killed by drone strikes.

Jihad….it’s bad for your health.

oh well.

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:57 PM

Speaking of the Germans, according to Daniel Silva’s new novel, The Rembrant Affair, the Germans are the Iranians best friends.

fourdeucer on September 28, 2010 at 7:58 PM

Ok, I’m fairly convinced now. PBHO is leaning forward in the foxhole and slinging hash where these guys live.

What happens if we happens to catch one of these fellers though?…..

(waterboard????)

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:58 PM

some of these guys we have to attempt to catch and interrogate. It’s one thing to splash them into a pink froth from 10K feet, it’s another to find all the other jihadbots living all over the place.

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:59 PM

“…a jihadi named Ahmad”

What are the odds?

rrpjr on September 28, 2010 at 8:01 PM

I have it on good authority that a bunch of Tea Bagging Terrorists, old people and veterans are gonna stage an attack at the polls NOV. 2nd, nothing specific mind you but I dhunter hereby suspend all Democrat voting until Nov 3rd.

DAT!

dhunter on September 28, 2010 at 8:01 PM

That isn’t ever going to change. And I wouldn’t pee on him if he was on fire for screwing over our troops.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM

Amen sister!

milwife88 on September 28, 2010 at 8:01 PM

PBHO isn’t allowing Predator strikes because he agrees with the method, he’s doing it in order to cover his azz. He knows damn well that if some slug terrorist got through that could have been scattered across the Afghan landscape via Hel1fire, he would pay dearly.

Bishop on September 28, 2010 at 8:02 PM

Suprise! However, even this won’t cure his incompetence, now matter how hard the MSM tries to!

Rndguy on September 28, 2010 at 8:02 PM

Only one little problem–taking out the masterminds behind the plot after several teams of attackers, all with European passports, had been dispatched from training camps. The attacks could still occur.
Atta would have still led the 9-11 attacks even if Osama had been taken out, once they were here and ready to go.

chickasaw42 on September 28, 2010 at 8:02 PM

It’s one thing to say we need to go all-out across the border because it serves our war ends, it’s another to say we need to do it as an emergency defensive measure because we’re facing an imminent attack.

Indeed.

Since when has Øbama had “war ends” beyond political ploys?

In the context of Øbama’s administration, seems obvious the drone strikes were “an emergency defensive measure”.

petefrt on September 28, 2010 at 8:02 PM

“…a jihadi named Ahmad”
What are the odds?

rrpjr on September 28, 2010 at 8:01 PM

This guy:?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uwOL4rB-go

dhunter on September 28, 2010 at 8:02 PM

I remember hearing about an attack coming the week of Oct 4 several months ago, but I can’t remember where.

Anybody remember anything about this?

Bruno Strozek on September 28, 2010 at 8:04 PM

the antiwar left is increasingly marginalized. They are only useful if you or I were president, and it shows. Right now, they are a mere hindrance, a speedbump, and getting in the way of the validation of the One’s drone thumpin’ ways around the world. Have you seen that the FBI is like rounding up a bunch of antiwar activists in/around Minneapolis IIRC? Ed may have more on that sometime….but it’s pretty funny how the antiwar left is glorified during R administrations and treated as a bunch of beeotches during an Obama administration…

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:55 PM

Yep, and the “anti-war” shills caught in the FBI’s Chicago sting are affiliated with the party (New Party?) that ObaMao was once affliliated with.

onlineanalyst on September 28, 2010 at 8:05 PM

I’m just cynical enough to say, “If a Republican president started talking about how he “severely disrupted” a major terrorist attack this close to an election where his party is about to be crushed…”

Rational Thought on September 28, 2010 at 8:05 PM

Why are we protecting Europe? Let those socialist pansies get hit and hit again until they wake up and smell the falafel.

Sure, they are part of the NATO troops in Astan, but many won’t leave their patrol bases at night, the Germans can’t conduct offensive missions and so on. They get in the way more than they help.

Blarg the Destroyer on September 28, 2010 at 8:05 PM

Obama: D@mn the CIA and intelligence. This attack was a good excuse to cancel elections, and deem myself King!

capejasmine on September 28, 2010 at 8:05 PM

Did Rachel Maddow sign off on this operation?

Really Right on September 28, 2010 at 8:06 PM

Yeah, it’s good news- but Al Qaeda operational commanders are kinda like Spinal Tap drummers.

abobo on September 28, 2010 at 8:07 PM

Port just remember, the Dems were MAD AS HELL when O wouldn’t stop the airstrikes via the drones, as O promised. This is about the ONLY thing I will give O credit for.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 7:49 PM

When did Obama ever promise to end the drone strikes????? In Feb 08 he was criticized by Republicans for saying he would attack in Pakistan if the intelligence justified them and he has been consistent with that promise. This is not a recent development and the tempo of these attacks increased immediately after he took office.

I’ve heard that they have pretty solid evidence that there are a number of operations underway against a number of European targets. Germany and Europe does matter not just because of the Hamburg connection with 9-11 but also because they might see the US bases and interests there as softer targets than those in the Near East.

lexhamfox on September 28, 2010 at 8:07 PM

It’s also very interesting to me that manboychild said we could “absorb” another attack.

SouthernGent on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

Well, that explains his attitude towards Israel. After all, she can absorb a few more attacks, right?

ButterflyDragon on September 28, 2010 at 8:07 PM

Since we know from Bob Woodward’s book that Rahm Emanuel was enthusiastic about these drone strikes, does that enthusiasm go away now that he’s moving on?

JavelinaBomb on September 28, 2010 at 8:12 PM

Why are we protecting Europe? Let those socialist pansies get hit and hit again until they wake up and smell the falafel.

Blarg the Destroyer on September 28, 2010 at 8:05 PM

And you have hit upon the crux of the liberal dilemma, how to protect a country with no defense?

They fail to realize our military might across the globe keeps America safe. That European socialism works (according to Bill Maher)is because they don’t have to spend the cash on a sufficient military force. They know the US has their back.

ButterflyDragon on September 28, 2010 at 8:12 PM

When you consider these are the toughest attacks to prevent …

tarpon on September 28, 2010 at 8:12 PM

funny how the antiwar left is glorified during R administrations and treated as a bunch of beeotches during an Obama administration…

ted c on September 28, 2010 at 7:55 PM

Even funnier that the antiwar left hates any R administration, but is jailed in a D administration.

txhsmom on September 28, 2010 at 8:15 PM

When you consider these are the toughest attacks to prevent …

tarpon on September 28, 2010 at 8:12 PM

Keeping with Obama’s metaphor, Bush did all the heavy lifting building the car, getting it licensed, working out all the bugs… now Obama gets to readjust the rear view mirror and take credit for such an awesome ride.

ButterflyDragon on September 28, 2010 at 8:15 PM

Why is the U.S. worried about a plot involving German jihadis? Because, as ABC notes, German citizens don’t need a visa to enter the U.S.

They are not “German” jihadis. They are Muslims with German passports. There is an easy solution to this problem: ethnic profiling. All “Germans” who are coming into America that are clearly Muslim or have origin in Muslim countries should go through extra security and background checks. But we are too politically correct to do the right thing.

Gabe on September 28, 2010 at 8:19 PM

hi allapundit;

i don’t want anyone to worry too much but…

i suspect that the recent sweeps of suspected terrorist related lefists in the usa is related to the growing threat of another mega-jihadist attack, and not just europe, but here, too.

the pace of these sweeps matches the pace of the drone attacks and is coincident wqioth the fbi’s recent warning about the increasing likelihood of imminent attacks here.

i suspect the fbi/cia desperately need leads and they are following every hint.

i suspect german muslims aren’t the only potential attackers.

latinos affiliated with the narco-terror gangs like farc and their mexican affiliates are also suspects – for smuggling into the USA jihadists and even wmd.

stay tuned…

reliapundit on September 28, 2010 at 8:20 PM

The CIA deserves some mad props for its drone missile strike program.

amerpundit on September 28, 2010 at 8:23 PM

I’ve heard that they have pretty solid evidence that there are a number of operations underway against a number of European targets. Germany and Europe does matter not just because of the Hamburg connection with 9-11 but also because they might see the US bases and interests there as softer targets than those in the Near East.

lexhamfox on September 28, 2010 at 8:07 PM

I swear I thought O said he was going to stop all drones. I am looking for it now.. but I could be wrong.

As for German Muslims…. Oh trust me, they have a epidemic they created themselves.

I was in Berlin during the 5th anniversary of the Iraq war. 1 million muslims marched. I was spit on as I didn’t have my “european clothing” on. The US embassy was closed as it was a saturday. I have never been so scared in my life.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 8:24 PM

What happens if Korans are damaged during airstrikes?

JammieWearingFool on September 28, 2010 at 8:27 PM

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 8:24 PM

Yeah, Germany has a habit of going from one extreme to the next. One day you can’t interfere with Muslim violence, the next day you shut down mosques and ask other countries to bomb a foreign land.

amerpundit on September 28, 2010 at 8:28 PM

Woah!

Wait a minute you NeoCon President. Waterboarding is one thing, but just killing folks with drones with out a Declaration of War?

Reports say civilians are being kiiled!

WAR CRIMINAL!

Opposite Day on September 28, 2010 at 8:29 PM

Don’t discourage good behavior.

We should be sending more of these tools to their maker. God will judge our enemies. We’ll arrange the meeting.

Red Cloud on September 28, 2010 at 8:32 PM

Which is what many of us have been predicting since 9/11. These cowards wanna go after easy targets, like malls and schools (Beslan).

Tony737 on September 28, 2010 at 7:52 PM

Impossible, commandos can’t attack those targets, they are ‘gun free zones’.

agmartin on September 28, 2010 at 8:33 PM

Aspirin Factories hardest hit.

BigWyo on September 28, 2010 at 8:37 PM

This site kicks assss.

John the Libertarian on September 28, 2010 at 8:39 PM

Aspirin Factories hardest hit.

BigWyo on September 28, 2010 at 8:37 PM

Dog’s tail: Watch me wag this dog.

petefrt on September 28, 2010 at 8:41 PM

Why are we protecting Europe? Let those socialist pansies get hit and hit again until they wake up and smell the falafel.

Blarg the Destroyer on September 28, 2010 at 8:05 PM

I totally agree. Europe needs to take a more active role in fighting these guys. We’re doing the dirty work while they criticize us because our hands are dirty. I don’t expect much from France, but the Germans know how to take care of business. At least they used to.

Europe needs a wake-up call. Sadly, so do we. 911 wasn’t enough to do the trick. Your grandchildren will have bigger problems than the national debt.

deewhybee on September 28, 2010 at 8:41 PM

Seems there may be a connection between the stepped up drone attacks and the recent lack of willingness on the part of some senior Pakistani Army officers to be more active in engaging jihadists in Waziristan.

This month a very senior Pakistani army delegation heading to MacDill AFB in Florida for a CENTCOM meeting was accosted, taking off a flight and detained for being suspected terrorists at Dulles Airport in DC. They immediately returned to Pakistan. Not talking about a few captains and a major or two, but Pakistani general officers.

That little slight has cost us a lot. The recent statements by Pakistan that they may or may not go out of their way to protect supply convoys crossing Pakistan enroute to Afghanistan came after this airline episode.

Face it, over the years we’ve gone from being on good terms with Pakistan to attacking them or affronting them in public so much so that American-trained General Kiyani is no longer firmly in the US camp. He is an India-centrist when it comes to Pakistan’s military. If India is successful in its relations with Afghanistan, then in Kayani’s eyes, India will be on two Pakistani borders. So long as the jihadis do not threaten Pakistan’s military or civil authorities and facilities, they are a lower target than India or local radical political elements. When a few of Pakistan’s nuke bunkers were threatened this past year by jihadis close to Islamabad, the Pakistani Army went after them with violence unprecedented in Pakistan’s recent history.

Now, we are faced with conducting solely a long distance drone war as Obama is adamant about bringing US forces out of Afghanistan next year. And soon we may not be able to use Karachi or other air bases in Pakistan (we are using about four at present) for logistics and for Predators. Manas in Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyzstan, is a viable alternative, esspecially after both Kirgizstan and Russia agreed to a new contract to supply aviation fuel for the US base. But being able to instantly respond to whatever targets the tech kids find will be hampered by not having air bases closer to Waziristan or the Northwest.

But the long and short of it is that we’ve not been very good about how we deal with and have dealt with Pakistan. Small wonder they have been less than candid with us over the years.

Now, this new upgraded terror threat to Europe and the US?

If we picked up one of the jihadists enroute to Europe, now confined to Baghram, then the horse is out of the barn…and we are using Predators to close the barn door. How much is for show, how much is diversion, and how close are we to hunting down and killing/capturing those jihadists who have already been dispatched across Europe and potentially within the United States?

Drone attacks are cool. No doubt about that. But how effective are they when it comes to hitting black teams dispatched well outside of the AfPak theater?

coldwarrior on September 28, 2010 at 8:44 PM

How about an Obamatuerism of the Century??

‘I was assured by my commanders in the field that the drone used in the attack carried a conventional warhead. Sorry about that. In the coming years, there will be a detailed investigation carried out…as soon as the 200 square miles in question is deemed safe for limited human habitation.’

BigWyo on September 28, 2010 at 8:46 PM

deewhybee on September 28, 2010 at 8:41 PM

Ummm…Europe is pretty much a goner…..

BigWyo on September 28, 2010 at 8:49 PM

Reports say civilians are being kiiled!

WAR CRIMINAL!

Opposite Day on September 28, 2010 at 8:29 PM

So you’ve noticed that when President George W. Bush was in office there were regular (though weakly sourced) reports about collateral damage from US and NATO attacks in AF and Iraq and Pakistan? Always ‘innocent civilians’, children, wedding parties, etc, etc. Even if it was the wives of the terrorists, we were scolded.

Now under Bammie, not so much. I guess the most brilliantest president ever is aiming our missiles more accurately.

slickwillie2001 on September 28, 2010 at 8:52 PM

Don’t they know we are fighting them in Afghanistan and Iraq so we don’t have to fight them in America and Europe? Didn’t they get the Petraeus missive?

Luka on September 28, 2010 at 8:55 PM

According to Barry, the US can absorb another terrorist attack. He’ll blame it on Boooosh and the Tea Party activists anyway. Loser. God protect us all from Nobama and every other enemy of this great nation.

Philly on September 28, 2010 at 8:57 PM

Thank God for good intel, UAVs and the willingness to use them.

TheBigOldDog on September 28, 2010 at 8:58 PM

I was really wondering what religion these folks were. I saw no mention whatsoever in the commentary, but fortunately I read the comments and saw Muslim mentioned 7 times.

Luka on September 28, 2010 at 8:58 PM

Obama’s aspirin factory

Willie on September 28, 2010 at 9:06 PM

The two purposes of the drone campaign aren’t mutually exclusive. Both problems — terrorists planning attacks in Europe and terrorists planning attacks on US/NATO troops in Afghanistan — are highly likely to be building at the same time. The bad guys are very likely to have the same purpose for both lines of attack.

The Madrid train station bombing went down in the annals of terrorist attacks as a big political success, because it got the Spanish to elect themselves a new government and pull out of Iraq. The terror planners in Pakistan read the same news everyone else does: they know European public opinion is turning against NATO ops in Afghanistan. Now, when the US president looks weak and no one in Europe can think of anything but the peril the Euro is in — now seems like a good time to try and roll out some morale-killing explosions there. Kicking up US casualties in Afghanistan would bloody the US as our election approaches too.

The scope and concentration of the drone campaign are the hallmarks of a surge. It’s a different kind of surge from what Americans have gotten used to. It probably has an operation name, but we don’t know it, because it wasn’t advertised in advance. Secrecy was paramount if it was to achieve its objective.

But in terms of having a focused purpose and attacking a coherent, organized threat from the terrorist enemy — it’s a surge. It looks like it’s targeting the terror organizations that would mount both of the terror campaigns referenced, in Afghanistan and Europe.

J.E. Dyer on September 28, 2010 at 9:09 PM

Luka on September 28, 2010 at 8:58 PM

I’ve narrowed it down to Amish, Wiccan or Dutch Reformed.

mankai on September 28, 2010 at 9:10 PM

If I was in charge, I would strike at will into Pakistan, and then dare the Pakis to attack us if they don’t like it. They would never risk the certain humiliation.

This may be one reason I am not in charge.

Tyrone Slothrop on September 28, 2010 at 9:11 PM

Amazed as I am at his continued blasting of these goatherding a$$holes, I thank God every additional day he finds the balls to continue doing it.

That isn’t ever going to change. And I wouldn’t pee on him if he was on fire for screwing over our troops.

upinak

Amen, girlfriend. AMEn.

tree hugging sister on September 28, 2010 at 9:16 PM

I see no indication that anything has been foiled.

BL@KBIRD on September 28, 2010 at 9:26 PM

Do drone attacks make them mad? Madder than a guy burning a koran? Is Obama creating terrorists? Is he putting our troops in danger?

deewhybee on September 28, 2010 at 9:33 PM

Do drone attacks make them mad? Madder than a guy burning a koran? Is Obama creating terrorists? Is he putting our troops in danger?

deewhybee on September 28, 2010 at 9:33 PM

It would seem to me that most of these gentlemen who are converted from Islam to fertilizer would be packing a Qur’an that is likely to be singed and soiled somewhat at their transformation.

BL@KBIRD on September 28, 2010 at 9:47 PM

coldwarrior on September 28, 2010 at 8:44 PM

As always, thank you!

OldEnglish on September 28, 2010 at 9:55 PM

I was in Berlin during the 5th anniversary of the Iraq war. 1 million muslims marched. I was spit on as I didn’t have my “european clothing” on. The US embassy was closed as it was a saturday. I have never been so scared in my life.

upinak on September 28, 2010 at 8:24 PM

Nice to know things haven’t changed in Berlin! My parents were stationed in Germany and it happened in the 60′s and when I was there in the 80′s. We are probably better off them being pacifists. Their NCOs and officers are the best I have ever worked with but I hear they have slipped a little lately.

lexhamfox on September 28, 2010 at 10:06 PM

Cha…This must be some kind of mistake, Obama is president now, Moosies love us, the world loves us, the oceans are receding, the earth is healing.

Alden Pyle on September 28, 2010 at 10:07 PM

Kafir on September 28, 2010 at 7:45 PM

I agree. The One is not stingy with the drone.

PattyJ on September 28, 2010 at 10:09 PM

The scope and concentration of the drone campaign are the hallmarks of a surge. It’s a different kind of surge from what Americans have gotten used to. It probably has an operation name, but we don’t know it, because it wasn’t advertised in advance. Secrecy was paramount if it was to achieve its objective.

J.E. Dyer on September 28, 2010 at 9:09 PM

I would not call it a surge but rather there are more available assets coupled with a political will to employ them. They have more drones available from the drawdowns in the Iraq theater and they have more specialized assets coming off production lines. They also have more cooperation from the Pakistanis than they previously had in terms of targeting intelligence. They are using more specialized ordinance which is reducing collateral damage.

They sorely lack certain types of pilots (Cessnas) and assets for generating live on the spot intelligence. In an age of remote warfare they are desperate for pilots, technicians, and translators to operate manned sigint and traditional real-time intelligence flights over the theater and it will take time to rectify that.

lexhamfox on September 28, 2010 at 10:36 PM

October surprise?

sandee on September 28, 2010 at 7:45 PM

Seriously. Obama is not the only one who wants the Democrats to stay in power. Our elections have the attention of the world.

JellyToast on September 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM

So the left is going to slam Obama for using fear for political purposes now just like Bush did? /s

aikidoka on September 28, 2010 at 11:08 PM

If it is severely disabled…or whatever, why are they stopping trucks in Atlanta? on Drudge.
I’m just not buying this severely disabled part. Too much wierd shit going on.

ORconservative on September 28, 2010 at 11:11 PM

It’s also very interesting to me that manboychild said we could “absorb” another attack.

SouthernGent on September 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM

This news kinda puts that in a different context, yes? Makes it seem like President Obama was trying to subtly lay the ground for a feared upcoming attack, rather than simply being dismissive of any future terrorism.

nukemhill on September 28, 2010 at 11:16 PM

I bet it’s because one of o’s big donors needed to move a load of cheap prosthetics.

Sonosam on September 28, 2010 at 11:16 PM

Golly, another shameful round of Islamophobia. Obama needs to apologize to all Muslims immediately. We must respect and honor their right to kill us.

Django on September 28, 2010 at 11:20 PM

Luckily, ABC has been digging and has new info

Wait a minute… When the NY Slimes exposes U.S. Intelligence efforts, it’s bad, but when ABC does it, it’s OK? WTF? Let’s just kill the terrorists and be done with it.

rmgraha on September 28, 2010 at 11:28 PM

reliapundit on September 28, 2010 at 8:20 PM

See Drudge: Counter-Terror stops trucks on I-20 in Georgia..

TN Mom on September 28, 2010 at 11:30 PM

Drone, It’s what’s for lunch!

faol on September 28, 2010 at 11:31 PM

ya burn a couple of books and da natives git restless

roflmao

donabernathy on September 29, 2010 at 12:15 AM

Ya, but what about the terrorist rights??!!11!! /s (did i really need the tag?)

I thought that everybody would love us once O came in cuz, you know, he was so nice and gentle and understanding and all that?
So….people still wanna blow us up? Wait..wait…people still wanna blow europeans up??
But…liberals LOVE Europe. How how can this be??

B Man on September 29, 2010 at 2:05 AM

Mastermind blowing.

NoDonkey on September 29, 2010 at 2:40 AM

Comment pages: 1 2