San Francisco considering banning toys in Happy Meals for some reason
posted at 8:43 pm on September 27, 2010 by Allahpundit
Explain this to me. I can understand the campaign against Joe Camel because (a) kids who try smokes are old enough that their parents aren’t supervising them 24/7 anymore and (b) ciggies are addictive, so once kids are tempted to try, it’s not easy to get them to quit. In other words, kids at that age have some degree of free choice and the cost of choosing badly is high, so maybe we want to eliminate any inducements to it. But what’s the argument with Happy Meals, which, last I checked, are geared towards six-year-olds? Is the worry that first-graders are strolling in there on their own during recess, all set to order fruit slices when suddenly a shapely Grimace figurine catches their eye? Mom’s going to be right there with them every time. So … why can’t she decide?
The proposal, which will have its first public hearing Monday, wouldn’t ban the popular toy giveaways outright but would make it illegal for kids’ meals to come with prizes if the food exceeds city-set limits on calories, fat, salt and sugar…
Wells said her company [McDonald's] – driven in large part by consumer demand – already voluntarily provides healthier choices for its customers, noting that kids can get apples with their Happy Meals instead of french fries, and milk instead of soda…
The toys offered with kids meals at fast-food restaurants are powerful lures for children, Mar said. Individual McDonald’s restaurants sell an average of more than 1,000 Happy Meals a week.
“As a parent, it’s not just parental choice that decides what meals to serve your children,” he said. “There’s the heavy marketing by an industry that connects food with a toy, and that can be a powerful influence. It’s the responsibility of the industry to promote healthy choices.”
Even Gavin Newsom thinks it’s a stupid idea, which puts this way out past the 99th percentile of dumb adventures in liberal governance. Seriously: We’ve all had the Happy Meal, we’ve all loved the Happy Meal, but how many of us as kids ordered the Happy Meal because of the prize? When I whined at mom to take me to McDonald’s, it wasn’t because my toy collection was woefully lacking a Hamburglar. It was because, like all Americans, I had my first order of fries before I had teeth and, from that moment on, knew I’d had to have more. Simple as that. If you’re going to ban something to improve people’s health, ban the fries. And thenceforth shall begin the most lucrative black market of all time.
Exit question: Why not just have San Francisco pay people to stay thin?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
It gets worse. From the “Last Airbender” series, the Sokka figure. What does that “bommerang” he’s holding look like? Move the arm down. Press the button. Yeah. I still have it. I bet it’s on Youtube, too.
VerbumSap on September 28, 2010 at 12:13 AM
Good lands, I didn’t want that to be at the top of a new page.
VerbumSap on September 28, 2010 at 12:14 AM
ANOTHER reason to boycott San Francisco…
STILL not going to visit anytime soon…
Khun Joe on September 28, 2010 at 12:46 AM
San Francisco: Making Small Children Cry Since 1966!
Trying to figure out who’s got the most ridiculously fascistic city government in the U.S.: Frisco or NYC…
SuperCool on September 28, 2010 at 2:18 AM
The geriatric hippies in San Francisco are concerned about children.
Those that haven’t been aborted.
And the few whose parents haven’t been driven out of utopia, by the hellish taxation and home prices through the roof as part of SF’s ban on development.
There are so few children in SF that it’s surprising McDonald’s would even bother to offer Happy Meals.
NoDonkey on September 28, 2010 at 5:11 AM
Because we are the government and own those serfs we can tell them how to live, eat, breath, and defecate. If you don’t believe us, watch this.
{+_+}
herself on September 28, 2010 at 6:00 AM
I knew a guy who believed in abortion with a passion. He made a big deal one day about bringing water to a single blade of grass he found growing out of some dried up desert somewhere in some part of the world. It was evidence of the love he had in his heart for the earth. Babies he would abort. A blade of grass he walked a mile to bring a cup of water to.
Banning toys in happy meals can bring a sense of morality to a twisted mind that has none.
JellyToast on September 28, 2010 at 6:51 AM
Maybe this is just the first attempt in seeing how the government can influence parents. It is measurable by a decline in the sales of Happy Meals. This would be a good first test, parents save a little money while doing what’s “right” for their child. Although I’m not sure a recession is the testing time of choice for accurate results.
Cindy Munford on September 28, 2010 at 7:57 AM
The Ayatolah has decreed. There is no happy meals in islam, er San Fran…
Kuffar on September 28, 2010 at 9:03 AM
It is the responsibility of the industry to make a profit and stay in business, employ people and pay taxes. It is the responsibility of the PARENT to promote healthy choices. not the responsibility of the nanny state.
We didnt get our first McDonald’s around here until the early to mid 60′s. McD’s was someplace you went to get a snack,, a lunch or after a movie date. It was not someplace where you lived off the food. Things have changed, but common sense should kick in someplace.
abcurtis on September 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM
1) Research indicates that when a regular Big Mac connoisseur sinks his teeth into another one, the brain’s response to that is the same as an addict’s brain’s response to getting a fix. Furthermore, not getting a Big Mac “fix” will cause some withdrawal symptoms, similarly to what coffee / cigarette addicts experience. Junk food is quite addictive, and it’s very hard to quit to healthy food that isn’t bombed with so much sugar, salt, preservatives, etc. and doesn’t taste as good.
2) Mommy being there doesn’t mean anything. The kid will cry and yell and make life very hard for parents.
I think that certain junk food, based on some established criteria, should be treated the same as alcohol and cigarettes (all 3 products essentially contain harmful substances). Children under certain age should be restricted by law from buying and maybe even consuming it… for the same reason that it’s still not ok to sell alcohol or cigarettes to a minor “only once a month” because it’s a small amount.
It would be quite the change, and lobbying efforts from poison sellers hide behind catchy jingles, colourful ads and beloved children’s cartoon characters will probably block this, but I’d like to see it happen.
AlexB on September 28, 2010 at 1:10 PM
1. Do you believe in bigfoot too?
2. I guess the concept of being a parent is lost on you.
I know you’re a moron, and a fool. Maybe you’d be more comfortable in North Korea.
xblade on September 28, 2010 at 2:52 PM
They want them renamed “Gay Meals”?
Axeman on September 28, 2010 at 3:00 PM
San Francisco: Home of Nancy Pelosi who knows how much fun it is to have the POWER to control every aspect of the peasants’ lives.
The local San Francisco politicians are just trying to keep up with Pelosi as they practice the fine art of CONTROL.
Vote ALL Democrats out of office at the Federal, State and Local levels in November!
wren on September 28, 2010 at 3:14 PM
lol – are you homosexual? just wondering…
hey, great way to respond to my points :)
AlexB on September 28, 2010 at 9:17 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2