David Brooks: Tea partiers are narcissistic, egomaniacal, self-righteous people who distort the truth!

posted at 8:37 pm on September 18, 2010 by Patterico

David Brooks on the Tea Party:

Along the way, the movement has picked up some of the worst excesses of modern American culture: a narcissistic sense of victimization, an egomaniacal belief in one’s own rightness and purity, a willingness to distort the truth so that every conflict becomes a contest of pure good versus pure evil.

It’s good to know none of this applies to the Democrat party!

Narcissism? Brooks thinks the Tea Party suffers from it, but does not mention Obama. I guess Brooks thinks there’s no narcissism in Obama’s comparing his election to the fall of the Berlin Wall, or turning the White House into almost a shrine to himself, or reading a letter from someone who says she is going to be buried in an Obama T-shirt, or building an imperial stage for his nomination speech, or writing his autobiography years before being elected President.

Victimhood? Brooks thinks the Tea Party has it — but not Obama, who thinks people don’t like him because of his middle name, which his wife calls the “fear bomb”; or who plays the race card (I don’t “look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills”).

An egomaniacal belief in one’s own rightness and purity? Are you kidding me, David Brooks?

Obama humiliated the Supreme Court in front of the nation. He humiliated Netanyahu. He gives his opponents the finger (not once, not twice, but three times). He is haughty with opponents (even as Michelle assures us that he is never disagreeable).

A willingness to distort the truth so that every conflict becomes a contest of pure good versus pure evil? David Brooks, are you telling me that the Tea Partiers distort the truth, and President Obama doesn’t?

Let me list just a few examples, Mr. Brooks.

Obama claimed an aide filled out a questionnaire with extreme views, but his handwriting showed up on the form. He said he wouldn’t run for president in 2008 and then did. He ran a dishonest ad tying John McCain to Rush Limbaugh on the issue of immigration reform — and distorting Limbaugh’s quotes beyond all recognition in the process. He claimed McCain was “fueled” by money from lobbyists and PACs, when that actually accounted for only 1.7% of McCain’s money.

Obama flat-out lied about taking public financing — and he lied about why he didn’t do it, blaming it all on McCain when it was his own decision. Obama misstated the reason that he voted against a bill that would have required doctors to give medical attention to babies born alive after a botched abortion. Obama took money from oil companies and claimed he didn’t.

He inflated his role in the creation of the stimulus package. He was deceptive about McCain’s regulatory record.

Since being President, he has misrepresented job creation numbers; broken his promise to allow bills to be reviewed by the public before passage; broken his promise to have no lobbyists in the White House; broken his promise to close Gitmo (thank goodness), and has broken a whole host of other promises. He has lied about whether ObamaCare would cover illegals and a host of other things.

He asked people to send “fishy” online commentary about his health care plan to a special e-mail address: flag@whitehouse.gov. Sounds like someone making a list — but it’s all for the greater good, you see.

Obama has consistently demonized his opponents — including the Tea Partiers, the GOP, Fox News, BP and other oil companies, “bitter clingers” who won’t vote for him, Wall Street/banks and businesses, the rich (especially those who got bonuses), insurance companies during the health care debate, car companies, and anyone who opposes unions or him.

He called the Cambridge police “stupid”; has demonized insurance companies; gone after Rush Limbaugh; and recently declared war on John Boehner.

I don’t really have to list all the ways he has demonized and blamed George W. Bush, do I?

Yet according to David Brooks, the people who distort the truth and demonize opponents in an effort to paint themselves as the Good fighting the Evil are . . . the Tea Partiers.

Wouldn’t it be nice if the “conservative” at the New York Times could see a few logs in the opponents’ eyes, even as he whines about the mote in the eyes of the Tea Party?

Thanks to a reader who pointed me to the link, gave me considerable help in researching this, and listed all the people and groups Obama has demonized.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Funny, no mention of the Tea Party pants crease.

SlaveDog on September 18, 2010 at 8:39 PM

If a case could be made FOR abortion this guy would be a prime candidate.

dhunter on September 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM

Those characterizations fit Mr. Brooks much more than anyone else.

The NYT’s House Conservative.

Yes, I mean it that way.

It is the truth.

Brian1972 on September 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM

Brooks you pukes really need a life.

CWforFreedom on September 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM

What? The One is a tea partier?? OMG!

IlikedAUH2O on September 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM

Nice summary, Patterico!

I think the list of Obama’s horribles will be several pages long, come 2012.

LASue on September 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM

No mention of Christine O’Donnell “dabbling in witchcraft” and dating a satanist?

Gee… Guess that isn’t news.

Boxy_Brown on September 18, 2010 at 8:44 PM

Who the hell still reads the NYT?

If we’d just stop linking to that garbage we’d put Carlos Slim out of a few billion and do the whole world a favor.

Khorum on September 18, 2010 at 8:44 PM

Mirror, mirror,
On the wall …

OldEnglish on September 18, 2010 at 8:45 PM

Brooks is a boob. He proves it every time he opens his mouth.

GT on September 18, 2010 at 8:46 PM

Per Brooks…

Tea Partiers Are Narcissistic, Egomaniacal, Self-Righteous People Who Distort the Truth!

I didn’t realize that Spectre, Crist, Murkowski, et al were “teabaggers”!!!!!

Gohawgs on September 18, 2010 at 8:46 PM

300 comments, easy.

Emperor Norton on September 18, 2010 at 8:46 PM

Brooks is a racist. Islamophobe and homophobe too.

That’s about all that’s worth. Maybe even more than it’s worth.

petefrt on September 18, 2010 at 8:47 PM

C’mon..this is classic Brooks…did you really think that this was fictional?

AUINSC on September 18, 2010 at 8:48 PM

David Brooks. Who is this creature? Oh, he’s one of The Elitists.
If I were to continue, AP and Ed would ban me.
Suffice it to say that David Brooks is a hemorrhoid. Remember, a**holes are necessary. Hemorrhoids are a great big pain in the a**.

either orr on September 18, 2010 at 8:48 PM

Hey Brooks Bite Me!

This is either the guy that shows up at a meeting with dog do on his shoe and stinks the place up or hes’ the stuff on the shoe doin the stinkin. Either way glad I don’t get the Slimes or him on a regular basis!

dhunter on September 18, 2010 at 8:48 PM

Idiots like Nuttoboy encourage the likes of Brooks. This attempt to disparage millions of well meaning Americans is disgusting.

CWforFreedom on September 18, 2010 at 8:49 PM

Brooksie is pro-Israel, supported the Iraq war (at first) and cavorted with Bill Buckley. There is also no evidence that he ever publicly soiled himself or evinced psychotic tendencies. He would otherwise make a good host on MSNBC.

He wants to move away from Goldwater and Reagan. The destination is never made clear. I heard that he has a special dislike for the Christian Right.

IlikedAUH2O on September 18, 2010 at 8:50 PM

Breaking Question of the Day!

Did a Tea Partier just spit on Breitbart?

MeatHeadinCA on September 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM

Sounds like any other President would of been long since impeached on those list of charges in normal times…

Tuari on September 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM

Typical establishment crony talkin’.

pjean on September 18, 2010 at 8:53 PM

Off the point but it is going to annoy a brain dead liberal who is coming here in about 30 minutes and who thinks you all are asses:

I don’t care what she has done. I love Christine O’Donnell.

IlikedAUH2O on September 18, 2010 at 8:54 PM

Best post I’ve seen here.

Makes me proud of being a tea partier. And I am NONE of what David Brooks says I am. Do I even care what he thinks?

No. What must elists think when they realize their bluff has been called?

manateespirit on September 18, 2010 at 8:54 PM

The left really has no idea what the Tea Party is about. They just whine and scream about what they want it to be about.

GFW on September 18, 2010 at 8:54 PM

C’mon..this is classic Brooks…did you really think that this was fictional?

AUINSC on September 18, 2010 at 8:48 PM

Thankyou the guy has an imagination and a way with words, would love to see him debate Brooks!

dhunter on September 18, 2010 at 8:55 PM

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WARNING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
===========================================================

You are at,or near a Elephant Crossing Zone.

The Crossing Elephant Zone,changes,to any
direction,at any time.

These are really,really angry,p*ssed-off,perturbed,
and unperdictable….BE ADVISED!!!!

STAY ALERT AND EVER VIGIL,SAFTEY FIRST,
ASK QUESTIONS LATER!!!

canopfor on September 18, 2010 at 8:55 PM

David Brooks: Tea Partiers Are Narcissistic, Egomaniacal, Self-Righteous People Who Distort the Truth!

Sounds like an excellent description of Barack Hussein Louie Obama and not that bad of a one for David Brooks. It is really sad. Rove, Krauthhammer and Brooks, all lashing uncontemplatively out, and yelling ‘Oh look at me, look at me! as they slide further and further into irrelevancy.

Luka on September 18, 2010 at 8:55 PM

Off the point but it is going to annoy a brain dead liberal who is coming here in about 30 minutes and who thinks you all are asses:

I don’t care what she has done. I love Christine O’Donnell.

IlikedAUH2O on September 18, 2010 at 8:54 PM

As we know we have a President who says there are 57 states and a racist VP but all we get are lefties dredging up old videos of righties.

CWforFreedom on September 18, 2010 at 8:56 PM

Awful lot of blue in that post.

Lanceman on September 18, 2010 at 8:56 PM

Brooks only speaks to the conservative readers of the slimes, 8 rino elitist pundits and 4 congress critters, so who cares!

tim c on September 18, 2010 at 8:58 PM

Mr. Brooks: Please come to Auburn Alabama and say that, you liberal-fellating POS.

AubieJon on September 18, 2010 at 8:59 PM

No. What must elists think when they realize their bluff has been called?

manateespirit on September 18, 2010 at 8:54 PM

They see their power slipping away and their playhouse about to be burnt down around them and they are to a man NOT HAPPY and LETTIN US KNOW WHO THEY ARE.

So many elitist crybabies in one week has to be some sort of record. Keep pokin em Sarah, Tea Partiers, we shall drive them from their lofty perchs where they prey upon us else drive them insane!

dhunter on September 18, 2010 at 9:00 PM

Brooks is suppose to lean conservative? That’s a load of crap. What a coward, He looks and sounds like a classic liberal. get some balls dude and admit that.

Hummer53 on September 18, 2010 at 9:01 PM

What a take down! That’ll leave a mark.

booter on September 18, 2010 at 9:01 PM

By popular request,to David Brooks
=====================================

You’ve Got Another Thing Comin’ – Judas Priest (Lyrics Included)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWhInhE6emE

canopfor on September 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM

Tea partiers are narcissistic, egomaniacal, self-righteous people who distort the truth!

So unexpected – Alinsky ridicule by projecting onto your opponent your own qualities:

The second most easily-spotted ridicule tactic is what psychologists call, “projection.” The ridiculer assumes that you, his rhetorical enemy, possess the same moral code as he and that you have the same defects as he does. Since human nature never changes, and there simply are no new sins, some of what the projecting opponent spouts may ring true, and this is the bait. If a person says something like, “Your side lies,” odds are that he is right, at least to a certain extent. I’ve yet to meet a person who would swear that he has never told a single lie.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/defeating_political_ridicule.html

dtestard on September 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM

I think we need to put Brooks on Party-Switch-Watch…

Brooks is suppose to lean conservative? That’s a load of crap. What a coward, He looks and sounds like a classic liberal. get some balls dude and admit that.

Hummer53 on September 18, 2010 at 9:01 PM

If my understanding of the term is correct, there is nothing classically liberal about Brooks. More Big Gov’t conservative …

MeatHeadinCA on September 18, 2010 at 9:03 PM

Brooks needs a bow tie.

paul1149 on September 18, 2010 at 9:04 PM

David Brooks: Tea Partiers Are Narcissistic, Egomaniacal, Self-Righteous People Who Distort the Truth!

And they don’t press their trousers, either.

Wethal on September 18, 2010 at 9:04 PM

I WON.

di butler on September 18, 2010 at 9:04 PM

David Brooks: Tea partiers are narcissistic, egomaniacal, self-righteous people who distort the truth!
===================================================

A dedication,by Tea Party Patriots!!

Heart- If Looks Could Kill

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZQPGBrAMvA

canopfor on September 18, 2010 at 9:05 PM

No mention of Christine O’Donnell “dabbling in witchcraft” and dating a satanist?

Gee… Guess that isn’t news.

Boxy_Brown on September 18, 2010 at 8:44 PM

Considering the ‘goth’ fad going around, her ‘dabbling’ likely had next to zero spiritual content, and the ‘satanist’ was just a spiteful sack of hormones trying to spit on his parents’ religion.

Dark-Star on September 18, 2010 at 9:07 PM

I’ve spoken to and been interviewed by David Brooks.

He’s unimpressive.

Only an institution like the NYT would think that he has any value at all.

CrazyGene on September 18, 2010 at 9:08 PM

Ah. The “I’m rubber and you’re glue” defense. Do they teach that in law school?

RightOFLeft on September 18, 2010 at 9:09 PM

So what has David Brooks ever done or written that would make anyone think he “leans conservative”?

SlaveDog on September 18, 2010 at 9:09 PM

You’ve Got Another Thing Comin’ – Judas Priest (Lyrics Included)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWhInhE6emE

canopfor on September 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM

GOOD ONE!

dhunter on September 18, 2010 at 9:09 PM

I think I read somewhere that Brooks is now writing articles for The Onion and Iowahawk.

glennbo on September 18, 2010 at 9:09 PM

Spoken like a man whose net worth reduces with each passing year.

beatcanvas on September 18, 2010 at 9:10 PM

Woah. That’s a lot of linkage. Nice work Patterico, that must have taken a while.

Tacitus on September 18, 2010 at 9:11 PM

David Brooks, bless his heart.

Dan Pet on September 18, 2010 at 9:11 PM

And David Brooks is whose pet?

SlaveDog on September 18, 2010 at 9:14 PM

The stench of fear is in the air at NYT.

texriot on September 18, 2010 at 9:15 PM

You know – this RINO crap is pretty funny.

And, in my mind, these kinds of things being said by the likes of David Brooks just justifies everything we’re doing.

Keep pushing – there are more of us than them.

HondaV65 on September 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM

It turns out the elites are trying to make a big deal of Christine O’Donnell once “dabbling in witchcraft”. Details are here:

In Defense of Witches

Just imagine how much better we Americans would be if this much energy and creativity were used in promoting Constitutional principles and helping our fellow citizens, instead of tearing them down.

Mutnodjmet on September 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM

So Ed, you accept the premise?

lorien1973 on September 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM

As many others have stated, “And you ought to know.”

DrMagnolias on September 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM

lorien1973 on September 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM

Er, Patterico.

lorien1973 on September 18, 2010 at 9:17 PM

Along the way, the movement has picked up some of the worst excesses of modern American culture: a narcissistic sense of victimization, an egomaniacal belief in one’s own rightness and purity, a willingness to distort the truth so that every conflict becomes a contest of pure good versus pure evil.

It’s good to know none of this applies to the Democrat party!
==================================================

No kidding,especially with this Team Hopey/Changey
NeverEnding Story Circus!!!!!!!!

And,so far Liberals have left a violent wake!
———

*Chilling details emerge from Alabama professor Amy Bishop’s fatal shooting spree.

*… A pilot furious with the IRS crashed his small plane into an Austin, Texas

*… SEIU Goon Who Beat Tea Partier is “Community Organizer” … He IS the union.
===========================================

So far,its Bitter Violent Clinging to Angry Liberals
——————— 3 for 3,

and for so-called,violent loving Tea Party Patriots
——————- 0 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

canopfor on September 18, 2010 at 9:17 PM

“Along the way, the movement has picked up some of the worst excesses of modern American culture: a narcissistic sense of victimization, an egomaniacal belief in one’s own rightness and purity, a willingness to distort the truth so that every conflict becomes a contest of pure good versus pure evil …”

Brooks continues:

” … and their pants! Have you seen their pants!! Not a decent crease to be found in the whole lot of ‘em. And try to get into a conversation with them about Niebuhr. You’d be better off talking with a monkey!”

PackerBronco on September 18, 2010 at 9:18 PM

I was wondering when this turd biscuit would grace us with his creased load of bloviating garbage.

Bishop on September 18, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Brooks needs a bow tie.

paul1149 on September 18, 2010 at 9:04 PM

to go with his butt plug!

dhunter on September 18, 2010 at 9:19 PM

So what has David Brooks ever done or written that would make anyone think he “leans conservative”?

That’s my point. Why has he written for NRO and other conservative publications?

Hummer53 on September 18, 2010 at 9:20 PM

If my understanding of the term is correct, there is nothing classically liberal about Brooks. More Big Gov’t conservative …

MeatHeadinCA on September 18, 2010 at 9:03 PM

Are you insane, Fontana?
Ooops.

Lanceman on September 18, 2010 at 9:21 PM

Gee… Guess that isn’t news.
Boxy_Brown on September 18, 2010 at 8:44 PM

Guess not, if you show up at HA once per month for 3 whole minutes.

See earlier threads.

Bishop on September 18, 2010 at 9:22 PM

More Big Gov’t conservative …

I don’t know what that means.

Hummer53 on September 18, 2010 at 9:22 PM

..demonizing doctors who might want to cut out your tonsils or cut off your foot….

unlisted on September 18, 2010 at 9:22 PM

ALL the statists know is demonization of their opponents. They can’t debate, they can’t argue, they can’t discuss, they just demonize. Thanks Saul Alinsky!

Mojave Mark on September 18, 2010 at 9:22 PM

It turns out the elites are trying to make a big deal of Christine O’Donnell once “dabbling in witchcraft”. Details are here:

In Defense of Witches

Mutnodjmet on September 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM

Mutnodjmet: I’ve seen this Hit Job Operation before!!
=========================================================

Does Sarah Palin worship with a witch doctor? ? – Yahoo! Answers

canopfor on September 18, 2010 at 9:23 PM

david brooks is the new david frum.

feh.

frum/brooks/castle/bloomberg/chaffee/murkowski/crist.

feh.

RINOS:

ridiculous idiotic nonsensical obtuse schmucks.

reliapundit on September 18, 2010 at 9:23 PM

Projection is the hallmark of the modern day Progressive.

Hellrider on September 18, 2010 at 9:24 PM

Davey doesn’t realize that his opinions are completely obsolete. Or maybe he does, and that’s why his panties are in a wad. (The Victoria Secret Angel brand, if I guess correctly–light texture, pretty prints, no panty lines.)

Hey, is a joke about a faux-conservative wearing women’s underwear beneath this Tea Partier? It seems less than pure…and I’m supposed to be absolutely assured of my own “purity and rightness”, according to Davey. Hmmm….

Grace_is_sufficient on September 18, 2010 at 9:25 PM

It turns out the elites are trying to make a big deal of Christine O’Donnell once “dabbling in witchcraft”.

I hear that she dabbled in “penumbras” and “emanations”, oh wait, I’m sorry, that was the Supreme Court …

PackerBronco on September 18, 2010 at 9:27 PM

Wow!!!! These kooks don’t need the tea party to expose them. They are exposing themselves. Amazing, truly, amazing!!!!

mobydutch on September 18, 2010 at 9:27 PM

The left really has no idea what the Tea Party is about. They just whine and scream about what they want it to be about.

GFW on September 18, 2010 at 8:54 PM

Yes, they whine and scream about what they want it to be about.

But no. Respectfully, the left senses deep in their being what the Tea Party Movement is basically about. Deep in their being they sense that it’s not just a threat, but an existential threat. They are about to lose the moral high ground with most voters. And then the elections.

Is there a moral superiority to individual freedom? Self-ownership? Limited government? Free markets? You betcha. But we must make that case, and make that case stridently… in your face… on moral grounds, even especially in these times. If we do that, that they know will be the end of them.

petefrt on September 18, 2010 at 9:31 PM

Why does anyone care what David Brooks, David Frum, or Katherine Parker write or say?

Peggy Noonan and Christopher Buckley I can understand. But they actually wrote something worthwhile somewhere along the way.

NCC on September 18, 2010 at 9:32 PM

History degree from the University of Chicago, it;s a shame he didn’t learn any. He pro choice and for gun control, someone explain to me how this guy is supposed to be conservative.

Tommy_G on September 18, 2010 at 9:33 PM

I don’t know what that means.

Hummer53 on September 18, 2010 at 9:22 PM

A Big Government Conservative is someone that defines themselves as a Conservative, but has accepted the Welfare State as a necessary evil. As Sowell might argue, they are conservative in that they are trying to conserve, to some extent, Big Government.

MeatHeadinCA on September 18, 2010 at 9:33 PM

Why is anything this useful idiot has to say relevant to anyone that frequents HotAir. We all know what he is, even the resident RINO defenders.

He is completely vested in the survival of statist dystopian rule. He despises the unwashed plebeians.

He is so superior to the uncouth masses in the tea party demanding liberty and self-governance. He knows what is best for us.

In other words, he is a elitist smug statist jackaSS, or “Obama Republican” for short.

DeathB4Tyranny on September 18, 2010 at 9:35 PM

Brooks and his ilk don’t do mirrors.

edshepp on September 18, 2010 at 9:35 PM

History degree from the University of Chicago, it;s a shame he didn’t learn any. He pro choice and for gun control, someone explain to me how this guy is supposed to be conservative.

Tommy_G on September 18, 2010 at 9:33 PM

The NYTimes and PBS need a token conservative to look “balanced,” and he is happy to tkae their money to play this role.

Wethal on September 18, 2010 at 9:37 PM

A small little man on top of a small little hill.

JellyToast on September 18, 2010 at 9:37 PM

Funny, no mention of the Tea Party pants crease.

SlaveDog on September 18, 2010 at 8:39 PM

We wear jeans. It sends shudders down their spines.

SouthernGent on September 18, 2010 at 9:37 PM

Brooks is a mental trickle.

Expert job, Patterico, in dispersing Davey’s fatuous b.s. and dismembering his cadre of strawmen.

Linked to pieces.

profitsbeard on September 18, 2010 at 9:38 PM

Takes one to know one…… what a waste of oxygen.

ultracon on September 18, 2010 at 9:38 PM

Nice work Patterico. I like all the blue! A treasure trove and I am bookmarking this post for future reference.

Not that this evidence will sway Brooks’s opinion, but it is there to expose how sheltered and singular his view is, i.e., liberal.

conservative pilgrim on September 18, 2010 at 9:38 PM

Looks like Brooks is in Van Voorhees mode again.

abobo on September 18, 2010 at 9:39 PM

Who is David Brooks?

Wade on September 18, 2010 at 9:40 PM

canopfor on September 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM
GOOD ONE!

dhunter on September 18, 2010 at 9:09 PM

dhunter:)

canopfor on September 18, 2010 at 9:41 PM

Another genius stalwart from the Weekly Standard.

/s

John Doe on September 18, 2010 at 9:42 PM

This guy is suuuuuch a douche.

Dopenstrange on September 18, 2010 at 9:42 PM

Patterico may have wasted his good time dismantling this has-been hack, but no harm done in giving it the ‘ol college try.

RepubChica on September 18, 2010 at 9:43 PM

Narcissists ALWAYS project.

John the Libertarian on September 18, 2010 at 9:43 PM

Here’s one to add to your list

about Obamacare:
He has lied about whether ObamaCare would cover illegals and a host of other things.

Obama said on Sept. 11 that the rise in healthcare costs was inevitable. Up to that point, he said healthcare would be “free” and would lower costs.

conservative pilgrim on September 18, 2010 at 9:44 PM

^^ oops. Sorry about the typo.

conservative pilgrim on September 18, 2010 at 9:44 PM

“My take on it was Colin Brooks had already left the party. I didn’t know he was still a Republican.” Dick Cheney

txhsmom on September 18, 2010 at 9:45 PM

It turns out the elites are trying to make a big deal of Christine O’Donnell once “dabbling in witchcraft”. Details are here:

In Defense of Witches

Just imagine how much better we Americans would be if this much energy and creativity were used in promoting Constitutional principles and helping our fellow citizens, instead of tearing them down.

Mutnodjmet on September 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM

MMM backfire, this could only cause her to appeal to a certain stripe of Liberal and maybe even the Wiccans who if I know them right will feel the need to defend their own brand.

Sharr on September 18, 2010 at 9:45 PM

They are all scared to death.

TheBigOldDog on September 18, 2010 at 9:46 PM

hilarious! the cocktail conservatives went into full on panic mode this week.

exceller on September 18, 2010 at 9:47 PM

David who?

OhioCoastie on September 18, 2010 at 9:47 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3