Rasmussen: Feingold now trailing by 7 in Wisconsin
posted at 9:30 am on September 17, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
After winning his primary to gain the Republican nomination to challenge Senator Russ Feingold, businessman and newcomer Ron Johnson also got a bump in the polls. The latest Rasmussen survey puts him ahead of the incumbent by seven, 51/44. But as with all surveys conducted in the immediate aftermath of a primary, some caution should be taken:
After a decisive win in Tuesday’s Republican Primary, businessman Ron Johnson now holds a seven-point lead over incumbent Democrat Russ Feingold in Wisconsin’s U.S. Senate race.
The latest Rasmussen Reports statewide telephone survey of Likely Voters shows Johnson picking up 51% support, while Feingold earns the vote from 44%. One percent (1%) of voters prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) remain undecided. …
When leaners are excluded from the totals, Johnson leads Feingold 50% to 43%. In late August, Johnson and Feingold were tied in results without leaners. Prior to the latest poll, support for Johnson ranged from 44% to 48% in surveys since February. In those same surveys, Feingold had consistently picked up 46% of the vote.
The impact of a primary win usually results in a temporary bump to the victor, especially when the opponent wins an unopposed primary. We saw that dynamic in Minnesota’s gubernatorial race, for instance. The difference would be that Feingold had been advertising during the primary campaign, as well as actively fundraising and making major appearances. It’s also the latest in a series of surveys that show Feingold well below the 50% threshold, which had already identified him as being in danger of losing his seat.
Johnson is winning this with the independents. Both candidates hold their own voters in line, but Johnson has a 58/30 advantage among unaffiliated voters. He does best with voters over 40, which will likely be a strong turnout model as younger voters lose interest in midterm elections as a rule. Fifty-five percent of Wisconsin voters want ObamaCare repealed and 59% prefer cutting taxes to government spending in order to stimulate jobs. Obama’s approval rating is split at 49/49 in Wisconsin, which doesn’t help Feingold much in this cycle.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
:-o
Abby Adams on September 17, 2010 at 9:33 AM
sow. reap. you get it..
ted c on September 17, 2010 at 9:33 AM
Unelectable!
—AllahPundit—
mwdiver on September 17, 2010 at 9:34 AM
I’m enjoying each day and the polls and the news stories but I almost can’t wait until election night, once the votes are counted and the concession speeches begin.
myrenovations on September 17, 2010 at 9:35 AM
On Wisconsin!
WisRich on September 17, 2010 at 9:35 AM
O/T…..Paladino sent out mailers that smell like garbage. LOL*
AnninCA on September 17, 2010 at 9:38 AM
… wow.
And to think that before Scott Brown won earlier this year, this seat and Patty Murray’s seat in Washington were thought to be mortal locks for the Dems.
teke184 on September 17, 2010 at 9:39 AM
Funny story. My polling place is the downtown library in Madison. This lil old lady was in front of my me complete with a walker. When the guy handed her a ballot(after not checking ids of course), she asked how she can just vote for all the democrats and if our governor was running. I laughed. I felt bad but I couldn’t help it. We are so worried about the young vote, but we can’t forget about the aged hippies:)
sammypants on September 17, 2010 at 9:40 AM
And Obama went to campaign for Feingold earlier this month.
AND then Bam went to Ohio and Rassmussen now has Portman up 20!!!
Imagine what is going to happen in Conn during the next polls.
gonnjos on September 17, 2010 at 9:41 AM
I wonder if Obama and all his cronies being from Chicago carries an extra negative weight for Feingold, since Wisconsin voters get an up-close-and-personal look at Chicago-style politics even more than the rest of the country, and can appreciate the horrors of running the entire nation like the Windy City in a far more personal manner (especially if some people moved out of Chicago and to Wisconsin just to get away from that style of political corruption).
jon1979 on September 17, 2010 at 9:43 AM
Yes, and the icing on the cake will be a colorful statement by Gibbs the next morning.
sherry on September 17, 2010 at 9:43 AM
BYE
artist on September 17, 2010 at 9:44 AM
Yessssssssssss
He of McCain-Feingold.
Northern knockout!
thebrokenrattle on September 17, 2010 at 9:45 AM
C’mon Cheeseheads! Now we just need to get Dino Rossi moving in the right direction.
TimTebowSavesAmerica on September 17, 2010 at 9:46 AM
WIN. ;)
Kent18 on September 17, 2010 at 9:47 AM
… Bam went to Ohio and Rassmussen now has Portman up 20!!! – Gonnjos
It’s almost like he has the Midas touch or something … except instead of turning everything to gold, he turns it into sh1t … like the evil older brother in “Weird Science”.
Tony737 on September 17, 2010 at 9:48 AM
Yes, and the icing on the cake will be a colorful statement by
GibbsFibbs the next morning. – SherryThat’s if he can survive the head-explosion!
Tony737 on September 17, 2010 at 9:49 AM
The other difference is that there is nothing about Feingold that the voters of Wisconsin don’t know. He is a consistent vote on the fringe left of the Dem/Liberal party, which is already the fringe left of American political thought.
He’s a leftist. This looks like a solid lock, barring a major mistake by the alternative, Ron Johnson, and to me this is the most stunning upset on the radar so far. I thought Feingold was Senator for Life in WI.
Jaibones on September 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM
Gibbsy: “Somehow we failed to get our message out to the people.”
Jake Tapper: “Uh, no you didn’t.”
Gibbsy: “So you think we did?”
Jake Tapper: “Your party lost big time, didn’t it?”
Press Corps: “HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA”
fogw on September 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM
O’Blahma is truly the anti-Midas. Everything this jerkoff touches turns to sh!t.
Jaibones on September 17, 2010 at 9:56 AM
This is bad news for the Dems. While Feingold is a liberal, he at least comes across a decent guy, and his favorables bear that out. If he is in trouble, gotta believe this mid-term has the potential to be a big RED sweep.
joepub on September 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM
quick raise the drawbridge the peasants are at the moat.
so much for the triage. At this rate Pelosi’s district will be endangered.
unseen on September 17, 2010 at 9:59 AM
today is Constitution Day….
ted c on September 17, 2010 at 10:04 AM
Not sure what to do with this.
MadisonConservative on September 17, 2010 at 10:04 AM
I heard this guy once spit a piece of chewing gum on the sidewalk. I am downgrading my GOP Senate seat pickup forecast.
Greek Fire on September 17, 2010 at 10:05 AM
Woot! Ron Johnson is my favorite of the new faces for some reason. Now, onto Washington State!!
lizzie beth on September 17, 2010 at 10:06 AM
And Obama went to campaign for Feingold earlier this month.
AND then Bam went to Ohio and Rassmussen now has Portman up 20!!!
Imagine what is going to happen in Conn during the next polls.
gonnjos on September 17, 2010 at 9:41 AM
Actually, it’s Quinnipiac that has Portman leading by 20, 55-35. Rasmussen has him leading by 8, 49-41. Still, it’s clear that Portman is pulling away–the last seven polls have him leading by at least 7 points, with an average lead of 10.7 points.
This poll is GREAT news for Ron Johnson from Wisconsin (that rhymes–how ’bout a campaign song), but Dino Rossi seems to be slipping in Washington state–three straight polls (including Rasmussen) Murray at least 5 points ahead. Time to send Obama to Seattle to campaign for Murray!
Steve Z on September 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM
+7 for a relatively unknown challenger against a long-time incumbent in mid-September is not a mere bump.
Looks very bad for Feingold.
Missy on September 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM
So, the great unwashed middle, independents are joining the far right tea party voting mind set. Someone notify the establishment.
Kissmygrits on September 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM
Hmmm. Careful here. Feingold is down by 7, and that inspires hope for Pub win. Now, O’Donnell is down 11 in DE and McMahon is down 9 in CT, and that ALSO inspires hope for Pub wins. The point? By our criteria, Feingold can still win. So, don’t forget to help Johnson in WI. This race isn’t as blog-tastic as DE, but I’d hate to see him lose because folks were distracted by other races.
joejm65 on September 17, 2010 at 10:09 AM
Everybody thinks they’re gonna win, until they don’t. The cleansing has begun.
j_galt on September 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM
lol
RepubChica on September 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM
True. But in all the races you mention, the momentum is toward the GOP and against the Dems. That’s what inspires the optimism. Definitely need to keep the money and the support flowing though.
Missy on September 17, 2010 at 10:17 AM
I’m as excited as the rest of you but there is a lot of work left to do. The attacks begin now and a lot of sh!t is going to start flying. If everyone gets someone else to the polls, voting for our side,I’ll be a lot more comfortable.
New Patriot on September 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM
Soupy Sales or Russ Feingold?
slickwillie2001 on September 17, 2010 at 10:21 AM
…and, my birthday AND I was born in Wisconsin.
It’s a Red-letter day all around!
Fallon on September 17, 2010 at 10:22 AM
Oh yes
KeepOhioRed on September 17, 2010 at 10:25 AM
Is it too late for a RINO to jump into this race?
You know, to ensure victory in a blue state and all.
Akzed on September 17, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Hey Russ – smell my dairy air!
- Ron Johnson
pain train on September 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Don’t get cocky.
Dedicated Progressives did not stop after elections and kept on pushing year after year after year for decades. You do not stop with elections: they are just the start.
ajacksonian on September 17, 2010 at 10:47 AM
I kind of see what you mean, and thanks – I’ve been wondering for a long time who Feingold reminds me of. Please, though, have some respect for the dear, departed funnyman, Soupy Sales. Boy, he could make me laugh. Feingold only makes me want to cry.
Go Ron Johnson. I voted for him in the primary and will in the general.
kscheuller on September 17, 2010 at 10:49 AM
Here’s Johnson’s ad.
maverick muse on September 17, 2010 at 11:07 AM
pain train on September 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Good.
maverick muse on September 17, 2010 at 11:07 AM
I’d fly a Constitution banner if I had one.
They’d be easy to produce,
and there’s a market for them now.
maverick muse on September 17, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Remember Hugh Hewitt’s proverb: “If It Isn’t Close, They Can’t Cheat.”
The Republicans need to win by big majorities to avoid the Democrats stuffing the ballots, losing military votes, re-counting in order to find the right ballots, and all the other things they do to cheat.
We need to not just win, but win big. Or we will lose.
bonnie_ on September 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM
Socialism is bad.
jeff_from_mpls on September 17, 2010 at 11:37 AM
“This time is different, this time you’ve got me.”
stldave on September 17, 2010 at 12:15 PM
buh BYE
rtsidedragon on September 17, 2010 at 12:25 PM
Counterpoint – a 75-point win in one’s own primary is effectively an uncontested primary, especially when all of Ron Johnson’s focus was squarely on Russ Feingold and not on either of his primary “challengers”.
steveegg on September 17, 2010 at 12:40 PM
And no, that is not a typo. Johnson did beat Dave Westlake (a good guy who pretty much refused to fundraise and campaigned as though he were running for a low-population county office rather than a statewide one) and completely-invisible Stephen Finn (so invisible, nobody knew he was even running) 85%-10%-5%.
steveegg on September 17, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Russ doesn’t have a lot of good options. He can:
1) Run as a Washington-outsider.
He does that schtick every time and after 18 years in DC, that dog won’t hunt.
2) Run as a foe of government waste and abuse.
He also does that one every 6 years. Uh, after 18 years it doesn’t look like you’re too effective there Russell.
3) Run as a committed liberal, proud of his voting record for the stimulus, ObamaCare, etc.
They ain’t gonna work this year in Wisconsin.
4) Attack Ron Johnson as a mean heartless conservative BUSINESMAN who wants to kill old people, pollute the Great Lakes, take away our social security, and destroy everything good about America.
No good prospects there either. Ron Johnson is coming across as a nice likable guy — kind of like Russ Feingold 18 years ago. In fact, one of Russ’s strongest assets is that he appears to be a very nice guy even to people who disagree with him (not true, but that’s the perception); if he goes negative he cancels outs that last remaining asset.
Barring a misstep by Johnson, Russ is toast. Bank on it.
PackerBronco on September 17, 2010 at 12:45 PM
I might hazard to throw in Tommy Thompson as well. Tommy is a pretty astute poll and pretty popular in the state but I think that also he knew that running in the state this anti-incumbant year would have been very difficult. I suspect that had Tommy run, the Tea Party would’ve had another scalp in the Wisconsin Republican primary.
PackerBronco on September 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Remind me to comment on how the Rats will attempt to steal Wisconsin using “overseas voters” in 16 days when the window of opportunity to put the final wheel in motion passes. It is safe to say that if Johnson, Scott Walker, Sean Duffy and company are not up by at least 5 points on Election Night, that advantage will disappear over the succeeding 17 days.
steveegg on September 17, 2010 at 12:52 PM
It was common knowledge that had Thompson decided to run, Johnson would not have run. I don’t think Westlake would have taken advantage of that (I was one of the ones who told Westlake when he decided to stop fundraising with $40K in the bank that it was a mistake), and Terrence Wall was not a credible Tea Party guy.
steveegg on September 17, 2010 at 12:55 PM
That may be. You seem to know a lot more about the inner political machinations than me. In any case, I’m glad we have Ron Johnson and not Tommy Thompson as the candidate against Feingold. Nothing against Thompson; it’s just the times.
PackerBronco on September 17, 2010 at 1:04 PM
I just have a better memory than the average egg. I too am glad we don’t have Thompson this time around, even though it was Rasmussen’s polling of a hypothetical Thompson-Feingold matchup at the beginning of the year that sounded the first substantial clue Feingold was truly vulnerable.
steveegg on September 17, 2010 at 1:12 PM
GOP leads in a lot of races too bad we messed up Delaware
SlimyBill on September 17, 2010 at 2:36 PM
But can you believe 49% still think Obama is doing a good job? Drinking the koolaid in a big way.
wi farmgirl on September 17, 2010 at 7:56 PM
We can thank Obey for that scaring all the old people that R’s will take away their medicare. He was at our Dem picnic, I wanted to go and push him in the river.
wi farmgirl on September 17, 2010 at 8:00 PM
Where?
wi farmgirl on September 17, 2010 at 8:11 PM
Feingold’s haughty, arrogant, condescending performances at his townhalls drove down his numbers. The influence of talk radio here (i.e., Sykes and Belling) drove the issue as well. I know Belling talked several times of the need for a big name in the race or someone with money.
Both Westlake and Johnson are first time candidates. This year, that’s a good thing. But Johnson had something Westlake didn’t. Money and the ability to raise it. When Westlake decided to limit his fundraising to selling orange T-shirts on the Internet he became a kook IMHO. No matter his positions. Westlake never could have raised the amount of money that will drive the Feingold desperation onslaught. Which, I predict, will be right out of the sewer to the extent we have not seen here previously.
pdigaudio on September 17, 2010 at 8:49 PM