If these trends continue, Republicans could gain 60 seats in the House
posted at 3:36 pm on September 13, 2010 by Patrick Ishmael
Since April, I’ve been predicting a House GOP pick-up in the low 50s. Subsequent months of data seemed to strengthen the likelihood of a 52-seat-or-so outcome without greatly expanding the field of Democratic representatives at genuine risk, but only recently has the direness of the party’s electoral predicament really crystallized. In all, a remarkably high number of Democratic seats — 118 to be exact — are now, in one way or another, in play. Forty-four seats are now pure toss-ups or worse.
The last month has been particularly bad for Democrats. From April to August, the average rating (solid/likely/lean/tossup) of Democratic seats steadily moved downward in my survey; even so, August to September turned out to be worse than all previous months combined.
| 4/19/2010 | Δ | 5/14/2010 | Δ | 6/6/2010 | Δ | 7/12/2010 | Δ | 8/12/2010 | Δ | 9/9/2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | -0.04 | 0.92 | -0.02 | 0.91 | -0.05 | 0.85 | -0.03 | 0.83 | -0.16 | 0.67 |
While I don’t think future declines will accelerate exactly quite as much as the August to September period, I do think that Democrat fortunes will continue to fall at a more modest rate for the remaining two months of the campaign season. Thus, assuming declines roughly equal to the declines in those first months and distributing them evenly to all of the races, and Democrats are looking at 52 seats that are just toss-ups or worse on election day. From seat 53 to seat 78, pretty much anything can happen, as all are between the toss-up and lean Democrat categories. Seat 79, currently Dan Maffei’s NY-25, looks to be the high end of GOP gains. However, assuming the GOP wins a third of those intervening seats, the math is pretty straightforward: about 60 new GOP seats.
This all assumes some pretty fierce wave action, which I think is reasonable to believe will happen. Moreover, the 60 most vulnerable seats listed are simply the most likely to me to flip; given the countless factors at the macro and micro levels, the actual list of 60 flipped seats will be different. Regardless of the particular Ws and Ls, the seismic political impact would be the same.
Here’s the data graphically. The first graph is sorted by congressional seat, worst score to best; the second, by monthly raw score, regardless of congressional seat.
Below is the complete list of House seats, most vulnerable to least. Press CTRL-F to search for the seats you’re interested in.
| District | Dem incumbent | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | TN-6 | OPEN (Gordon) |
| 2 | LA-3 | OPEN (Melancon) |
| 3 | NY-29 | OPEN |
| 4 | AR-2 | OPEN (Snyder) |
| 5 | IN-8 | OPEN (Ellsworth) |
| 6 | MD-1 | Frank Kratovil |
| 7 | MS-1 | Travis Childers |
| 8 | KS-3 | OPEN (Moore) |
| 9 | TN-8 | OPEN (Tanner) |
| 10 | AR-1 | OPEN (Berry) |
| 11 | NM-2 | Harry Teague |
| 12 | ND-AL | Earl Pomeroy |
| 13 | TX-17 | Chet Edwards |
| 14 | CO-4 | Betsy Markey |
| 15 | SD-AL | Stephanie Herseth Sandlin |
| 16 | FL-24 | Suzanne Kosmas |
| 17 | IN-9 | Baron Hill |
| 18 | SC-5 | John Spratt |
| 19 | WV-1 | Alan B. Mollohan |
| 20 | FL-2 | Allen Boyd |
| 21 | OH-1 | Steve Driehaus |
| 22 | OH-15 | Mary Jo Kilroy |
| 23 | NH-1 | Carol Shea-Porter |
| 24 | OH-16 | John Boccieri |
| 25 | NH-2 | OPEN (Hodes) |
| 26 | VA-5 | Tom Perriello |
| 27 | WA-3 | OPEN (Baird) |
| 28 | FL-8 | Alan Grayson |
| 29 | NV-3 | Dina Titus |
| 30 | PA-7 | OPEN (Sestak) |
| 31 | AL-2 | Bobby Bright |
| 32 | MI-7 | Mark Schauer |
| 33 | IL-11 | Debbie Halvorson |
| 34 | WI-7 | OPEN |
| 35 | VA-2 | Glenn Nye |
| 36 | AZ-1 | Ann Kirkpatrick |
| 37 | MI-1 | OPEN (Stupak) |
| 38 | PA-11 | Paul Kanjorski |
| 39 | ID-1 | Walter Minnick |
| 40 | NY-24 | Michael Arcuri |
| 41 | IL-14 | Bill Foster |
| 42 | NC-8 | Larry Kissell |
| 43 | VA-9 | Rick Boucher |
| 44 | MO-4 | Ike Skelton |
| 45 | GA-8 | Jim Marshall |
| 46 | TN-4 | Lincoln Davis |
| 47 | PA-3 | Kathy Dahlkemper |
| 48 | PA-8 | Patrick Murphy |
| 49 | OH-18 | Zack Space |
| 50 | TX-23 | Ciro Rodriguez |
| 51 | PA-10 | Chris Carney |
| 52 | AZ-5 | Harry Mitchell |
| 53 | KY-6 | Ben Chandler |
| 54 | IA-3 | Leonard Boswell |
| 55 | AZ-8 | Gabrielle Giffords |
| 56 | CA-11 | Jerry McNerney |
| 57 | NC-11 | Heath Shuler |
| 58 | NY-20 | Scott Murphy |
| 59 | CO-3 | John Salazar |
| 60 | PA-12 | Critz |
| 61 | NY-23 | Bill Owens |
| 62 | WI-8 | Steve Kagen |
| 63 | NJ-3 | John Adler |
| 64 | FL-22 | Ron Klein |
| 65 | IN-2 | Joe Donnelly |
| 66 | OR-5 | Kurt Schrader |
| 67 | MA-10 | OPEN (Delahunt) |
| 68 | NY-13 | Mike McMahon |
| 69 | NY-19 | John Hall |
| 70 | NY-1 | Tim Bishop |
| 71 | OH-13 | Betty Sutton |
| 72 | NM-1 | Martin Heinrich |
| 73 | VA-11 | Gerald Connolly |
| 74 | MI-9 | Gary Peters |
| 75 | PA-17 | Tim Holden |
| 76 | PA-4 | Jason Altmire |
| 77 | WV-3 | Nick Rahall |
| 78 | CA-47 | Loretta Sánchez |
| 79 | NY-25 | Dan Maffei |
| 80 | UT-2 | Jim Matheson |
| 81 | IL-8 | Melissa Bean |
| 82 | MS-4 | Gene Taylor |
| 83 | NC-7 | Mike McIntyre |
| 84 | GA-2 | Sanford Bishop, Jr. |
| 85 | IL-17 | Phil Hare |
| 86 | NC-2 | Bob Etheridge |
| 87 | CT-5 | Christopher Murphy |
| 88 | OK-2 | Dan Boren |
| 89 | MN-1 | Tim Walz |
| 90 | AR-4 | Mike Ross |
| 91 | WI-3 | Ron Kind |
| 92 | WA-2 | Rick Larsen |
| 93 | CA-18 | Dennis Cardoza |
| 94 | KY-3 | John Yarmuth |
| 95 | CT-4 | Jim Himes |
| 96 | CO-7 | Ed Perlmutter |
| 97 | NJ-12 | Rush Holt |
| 98 | GA-12 | John Barrow |
| 99 | OH-6 | Charlie Wilson |
| 100 | ME-2 | Michaud |
| 101 | OR-1 | David Wu |
| 102 | OR-4 | DeFazio |
| 103 | CA-20 | Jim Costa |
| 104 | TN-5 | Cooper |
| 105 | RI-1 | Kennedy |
| 106 | IA-1 | Bruce Braley |
| 107 | IA-2 | Loebsack |
| 108 | TX-27 | Solomon Ortiz |
| 109 | MO-3 | Russ Carnahan |
| 110 | WA-9 | Adam Smith |
| 111 | NC-4 | Price |
| 112 | ME-1 | Chellie Pingree |
| 113 | MA-5 | Tsongas |
| 114 | MA-6 | John F. Tierney |
| 115 | NM-3 | Ben R. Luján |
| 116 | NY-4 | McCarthy |
| 117 | NJ-6 | Pallone |
| 118 | CA-39 | Sanchez |
Update: Numbers guy Nate Silver weighs in today with what I believe is his first House prediction. Worth a read, but to sum his findings: it’s very likely that the GOP will take the House, and there’s a one-in-four chance that it takes 60+ seats. My obvious suspicion is that his “60+” probability will be revised up later, but we shall see.
—–
This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Sloooow news day. Then again, PI’s posts are always pretty helpful and well done.
Abby Adams on September 13, 2010 at 3:38 PM
Russ Carnahan (MO) has got to GO
flyoverland on September 13, 2010 at 3:39 PM
http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2010/09/13/tis-better-to-have-lost-and-lost-again-than-have-won-anything-at-all/
Bradky on September 13, 2010 at 3:41 PM
hey hey, ho ho, dem house and senate, gots to go.
dthorny on September 13, 2010 at 3:42 PM
Woohoo! three Washington staters in play.
WitchDoctor on September 13, 2010 at 3:45 PM
No wonder dems are running against Obama and Pelosi.
How depressing for dems, but serves them right.
darwin on September 13, 2010 at 3:47 PM
The Dems will be losing like dogs.
It’s O.K., I can say that.
SlaveDog on September 13, 2010 at 3:49 PM
I am confident that the win will be big. I am not confident the win will be huge.
Reading some of the left comments of blogs and news sites the Dems are just as confident that “Boner” will not be speaker of the House.
My point is that our effort has to be strong and unwavering.
ORconservative on September 13, 2010 at 3:50 PM
Don’t set youselves up for disappointment. Just hope for House +40. It’s all gravy after that.
Senate- don’t count on taking it. But it’ll be close.
Bat Chain Puller on September 13, 2010 at 3:50 PM
Ok every time I see that pic it makes me lol. What is Nancy doing? Harry looks like he is sleeping.
Cookies Mom on September 13, 2010 at 3:51 PM
Woohoo is right! I’m in Edmonds…how about you?
dont taze me bro on September 13, 2010 at 3:54 PM
I’m in a Oregon district that has a good shot and by the look of the number of lawn signs, Kurt Schrader had better start looking for work.
ORconservative on September 13, 2010 at 3:57 PM
Lucky #95, Jim Himes (CT-4) has to go, too.
If the people above him on the list are in MORE jeopardy, this will be a House tsunami. Himes is toast, and only got in because of the Obama wave. If he paid any attention at all at his “town halls,” on Obamacare, he knows it.
His Republican contender is Debicella…see ad above.
marybel on September 13, 2010 at 3:59 PM
Forget republicans! How many CONSERVATIVES are going to gain seats!!!
grapeknutz on September 13, 2010 at 4:02 PM
Just a fyi–even for #118, which is Loretta Sanchez–she’s just barely leading by 45-43. In short, all 118 could be potential pickups.
http://americanactionforum.org/files/AAF%20CA%2047%20Memo.pdf
TimTebowSavesAmerica on September 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM
Patrick,
I agree with your GOP versus Democrat trends. This year should be a bloodbath of epic proportions. However, let me play Devil’s advocate for a minute and remind you that, national trends aside, each representative’s election is a distinct event. Remember the old maxim that “all politics is local”? It might apply in this case.
Physics Geek on September 13, 2010 at 4:05 PM
The TV ads should say “They were told that if they voted such away, they would be in trouble in NOV., Now they want you to feel sorry for them and to trust that they learned their lessons. Nottttt!!!”
BruceB on September 13, 2010 at 4:11 PM
It just depends on how many patriots show up and vote the dictators out, doesn’t it.
tarpon on September 13, 2010 at 4:12 PM
It’s a pity that we are in a triage situation instead of just avoiding this whole mess in the first place.
Stop voting for clueless leftists and we won’t have to go through this time and time again.
Asher on September 13, 2010 at 4:14 PM
Since Annie Little
Will beat Pallone in NJ…
Plus One-Seventeen.
Seriously, Pallone is cruising for a whoopin’. This 11-termer is hovering around 40% in the polls, which is not a good place for a twenty-two year incumbent to be. Annie Little is going to clean his clock.
Which means the 116 Republicans in above her on this list should win, too. Works for me!
Haiku Guy on September 13, 2010 at 4:36 PM
It will get worse…much worse for the Dems…How? They and obama will keep talking…they have been exposed…the more they talk the more people will be repulsed…there is no other possible outcome
winston on September 13, 2010 at 4:41 PM
Too much info, my head hurts…
abobo on September 13, 2010 at 4:51 PM
If someone can shut of boehner, yeah I can see it.
RealMc on September 13, 2010 at 5:22 PM
Great, kid! Don’t get cocky.
/Han Solo
Battlecruiser-operational on September 13, 2010 at 5:24 PM
At least 68 seats and up to 80….
roux on September 13, 2010 at 5:37 PM
Anything over 40 is gravy…
But what YUMMY GRAVY that would be!
Mmm mmm mmm…
Khun Joe on September 13, 2010 at 5:38 PM
I keep being afraid the race peeked too soon.
We really need Obama and the rest to make one more really stupid mistake. Not one that would hurt anyone of course… but some stupid slip of the tongue that again reveals their disdain for the country they govern.
petunia on September 13, 2010 at 7:11 PM
I remember last election or maybe 2006 Ann Coulter telling some host that the election did not mean that Republicans were all but extinct but quit contrary the Democrats were in the death throes. At the time I seriously could not see it. Now I’m thinking how prescient she was.
Queen0fCups on September 13, 2010 at 11:23 PM
Caption depicting the true Speaker Phulofit.
Harry the only way we and going to win this election and keep our cushy jobs is to crush the testicles of Republicans and anyone who disagrees with our actions, and place them in S of S Clinton’s Lock Box.
MSGTAS on September 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM