Good news: Feds spent $18,000 to monitor negative media coverage of BP oil spill
posted at 9:12 pm on September 13, 2010 by Allahpundit
Actually, it was $18,000 over just two months, a six-figure rate as an annual salary. But it’s money well spent: Monitoring negative buzz about how Obama stacks up to Bush’s performance during Katrina is an important federal task because, er, well…
Hey — it “created or saved” a job for eight weeks, all right?
The federal government hired a New Orleans man for $18,000 to appraise whether news stories about its actions in the Gulf oil spill were positive or negative for the Obama administration, which was keenly sensitive to comparisons between its response and former President George W. Bush’s much-maligned reaction to Hurricane Katrina…
Among all the contracts, perhaps none is more striking than the Coast Guard’s decision to pay $9,000 per month for two months to John Brooks Rice of New Orleans, an on-call worker for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, under a no-bid contract to monitor media coverage from late May through July.
Rice told the AP that he compiled print and video news stories and offered his subjective appraisal of the tone of the coverage. “From reading and watching the media I would create reports,” he said. “I reported either positive coverage, negative coverage, misinformation coverage.”…
The Coast Guard expects BP to reimburse the $18,000, Coast Guard spokesman Capt. Ron LaBrec said.
Why would BP reimburse the Coast Guard for a political favor it was doing for the White House? Especially since, according to a PR firm in Baton Rouge cited by the AP, much of this same work could have been done on retainer for somewhere in the neighborhood of $2,000 to $4,000.
Follow the link for exciting details on other expenditures related to the clean-up, including $52,000 for, and I quote, a “marine charter for things.” Exit question: Is it really worth getting upset about 18 grand at this point? Sure, the outlay was wholly inappropriate, but our federal spending these days exists mainly in the realm of imaginary numbers. Is it worth quibbling over i2 here?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
1 1/17th of an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act sign. Not much at all — until it starts adding up.
unclesmrgol on September 13, 2010 at 9:14 PM
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/26/obamas-gulf-drill
ninjapirate on September 13, 2010 at 9:15 PM
Economy in government!
Inkblots on September 13, 2010 at 9:16 PM
Only $18,000? Why that’s like spitting in the ocean.
ncborn on September 13, 2010 at 9:18 PM
BTW, the Palin group they were talking about are the ones behind this…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGPFPBmzRrQ
ninjapirate on September 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM
That’s all of my annual Federal tax bill…plus a little change. Upset? Naw. As long as Obama can keep playing golf every week, who am I to complain.
AUINSC on September 13, 2010 at 9:23 PM
That man creeps me out.
SouthernGent on September 13, 2010 at 9:25 PM
One job saved or created.
Electrongod on September 13, 2010 at 9:25 PM
This administration has always been about style over substance.
GarandFan on September 13, 2010 at 9:25 PM
All those unemployed due to Obama`s policies down on the Gulf Coast won`t be fooled and hopefully they`ll be loud about it.
ThePrez on September 13, 2010 at 9:32 PM
$18,000! That’s just change behind the administration’s sofa cushions.
yoda on September 13, 2010 at 9:32 PM
Of course it’s worth quibbling over. A few thousand here, a few thousand there and before you know it, you’re a few billion in the hole.
ButterflyDragon on September 13, 2010 at 9:34 PM
Is this what Rahm meant by not letting a crisis go to waste?
The Dems politicized Katrina and spun their narrative that the media accepted without question. It looks as if the Gulf spill is more of the same. These people are despicable. They throw away hard-working taxpayers’ money to feather their own power broking.
onlineanalyst on September 13, 2010 at 9:35 PM
Only $18,000?
I am actually surprised it wasn’t more.
portlandon on September 13, 2010 at 9:36 PM
When the meme started to be “Obowma’s Katrina”…
… they were willing to spend Trillions to kill the story.
Once our “Free and Independent” press decided to follow the marching orders of the White House to kill the story…
… $18K was just to cover the tip.
Seven Percent Solution on September 13, 2010 at 9:44 PM
Abuse of power?
onlineanalyst on September 13, 2010 at 9:46 PM
Here’s some negative coverage – fresh from Drudge:
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/oil-bp-spill-found-bottom-gulf/story?id=11618039
——-
Studies conducted by the University of Georgia and the University of South Florida caused controversy back in August when they found that almost 80 percent of the oil that leaked from BP’s well is still out in the waters of the Gulf.
Their report stood in stark contrast to that of the federal government, which on Aug. 4 declared that 74 percent of the oil was gone, having broken down or been cleaned up.
“A report out today by our scientists shows that the vast majority of the spilled oil has been dispersed or removed from the water,” President Obama said in August.
The studies by Joye and other scientists found that what the government had reported to the public only meant that the oil still lurked, invisible in the water.
Though initially denying the claim, BP — and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration — acknowledged the existence of the dispersed oil. BP subsequently pledged $500 million for gulf research.
In May, Joye was featured on a newscast as part a team of scientists that discovered giant underwater plumes of oil. Joye and other marine researchers claimed that these plumes present a major threat to underwater creatures.
“The concentrations that are currently out there in various locations are high enough to have a toxic effect on marine life,” said Charles Hopkinson, also of the University of Georgia’s marine sciences program.
NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco, the government’s top ocean scientist, has acknowledged concerns over the effects of dissolved oil, but has said that chemical dispersants had largely done their job.
“Nobody should be surprised,” Joye said. “When you apply large scale dispersants, it goes to the bottom — it sediments out. It gets sticky.”
ABC News’ Susan Schwartz contributed to this report.
——-
I feel like a voice in the wilderness, though I live little more than a dozen miles from the Gulf.
1. The Federal government told me I was full of SH&#
2. Rush Limbaugh, who I usually agree with, told me I was full of SH$#.
3. HotAir poster Kermit, purportedly a Louisiana resident who purportedly knows the offshore-oil industry, (nicely) (and I have no reason to disbelieve his bona fides) told me I was full of SH^%
That freezer-ful of shrimp I put away, despite ridicule, is looking better.
OBAMA LIED; THE GULF DIED
———-
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 9:48 PM
20 trillion for the “war on poverty”. It all adds up.
Mojave Mark on September 13, 2010 at 9:49 PM
So,Team Hopey p*ssed away $18,000 into the Gulf!!
This sounds more like a ploy,for walking around expenses
to help out in the November election by buying votes!
(snark,a bit).
canopfor on September 13, 2010 at 9:55 PM
Yes, it is. This is the typical waste of a bloated bureaucracy that is utterly shameless in its lack of responsiveness to the people and the economic situation. They figure that everything they spend ends up in someone’s pocket, so they must be stimulating the economy.
Morons.
disa on September 13, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Obama was either asleep at the switch or intentionally ignored the spill as long as possible.
Then he blocked the oil skimmers.
Then he stopped the skimmers to check for life vests.
Then to cover his delay, he let BP spew dispersant like a pissing drunk.
Then the MSM said that 75% of the oil had “vanished.”
Then the MSM and Rush Limbaugh echoed this bullsh&t.
Then Woods Hole said, “not so fast.”
Then more denial from all of the above.
To repeat, I have had a high-level Louisiana executive source from the beginning who discussed the BLOB, and I have talked about how Obama allowed the dispersants to be spewed past the EPA limits to prevent the sight of tarred beaches on the MSM nightly news, and how there is a Gulf-killing carpet of oil out there.
I need to have more confidence in myself in the future, and not just walk away from HotAir, as I did for awhile.
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 10:07 PM
No $hit!
I hate to be a told ya so (not your personally) .. but I did.
I wonder how much money Team Obama spent keeping the media away from the area so they couldn’t get any pictures IE: no fly zone over the entire area.
Texas Gal on September 13, 2010 at 10:08 PM
By the way, I drove the beaches from Long Beach to Biloxi, Miss., on Friday, 3 times.
Crews everywhere with special trucks sweeping up black sand so that it doesn’t build up. I am glad they are doing this.
My girlfriend picked up tar-cakes they missed.
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 10:14 PM
Couldn’t Obama get NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, or CNN to do this for free?
BuckeyeSam on September 13, 2010 at 10:16 PM
I am being completely serious when I tell you that I tried to turn around on Hwy. 90 for a couple miles in Gulfport, Miss. because we missed the casino (trying to get in to see Smokey Robinson!) and could not even pull over on the narrow beachfront road because every turn-out was filled with sweeping trucks from other states.
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Read that article this morning. Part of me wanted to believe Rush about evaporation/oil eating microbes and the other part was waiting for this shoe to drop.
But I would like to see pictures of oil laying on the ocean/gulf floor, a complete map of it. Core samples are a start.
What have the fishermen found/talked about?
journeyintothewhirlwind on September 13, 2010 at 10:22 PM
Comment eaten?
I’ll try again – to remember what I posted:
I treid to turn around for a couple miles near Biloxi and could not because every turnout was completely blocked with clean-up trucks with out-of-state plates – people with yellow vests and plastic bags, cleaning the beach.
They didn’t look especially busy -but there is a definite black line at the tide line. And the sea is murky and heavy and dead-looking.
My girlfriend picked up hard tar chips at the Gulfport-Biloxi line.
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM
Looking for news stories that don’t conform to the WH message is simply part of media control. Once you know who’s speaking out, you can send them a Sebelius-type letter informing them how “unhelpful” their criticism is….
n0doz on September 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM
Smokey Robinson still completely kills it at age 70, by the way :-) He played in Biloxi Saturday night!
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 10:30 PM
journey,
I agree with you. I ‘d like to see map of the oil.
My executive source early on called for mapping of the “Blob,” but it’s either not happening, or not being released to the executives who need it!
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 10:41 PM
SymbiGroup LLC does something called nucleus project
Suck up comments from blogs, filter by keyword, analyze, compile report. Six degrees of separation to make denial plausible, solicit funds from some foundation. Send out an army of activists to counter unfavorable information.
Skandia Recluse on September 13, 2010 at 10:43 PM
The article I read this morning said they were taking samples but basically they have no way to predict the consequences because this has never happened before. Obama’s 17-agency committee allowed BP to shoot dispersant directly into the leak at the source to keep the oil from rising, that is what is laying on the seafloor.
Then I read today that Obama have given Mexico a $1B for oil drilling while he keeps our moratorium in place. Then I read this today:
Obama wants to double offshore oil inspection fees
Texas Gal on September 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM
If they want suck-up comments from blogs, they might start with LGF! :-)
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 10:50 PM
My problem with the deal is that Obama did not want anything to be seen on the “Nightly News.”
That means no visible effect – no black beaches – no oil-skimming boats – no nothing.
The only was to do this – AND I BELIEVE HE KNEW THIS FROM EARLY ON – was to just hose it down with cancer-causing dispersants until it disappeared. Had the oil been allowed to rise, A LOT of it could have been burned or captured.
I BELIEVE THAT THE POLITICALLY-MOTIVATED ACTIONS OF PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, IN INTENIONALLY SINKING THE PROBLEM OUT OF SIGHT WITH DISPERSANTS, HAVE POISONED THE GULF OF MEXICO FOR YEARS TO COME.
cane_loader on September 13, 2010 at 10:56 PM
No matter the amount. Congressmen have been investigated by the ethics committees for sending out fundraising letters on government letterhead. Ethics is ethics; you don’t spend government money for consultants to help manage your political popularity.
slickwillie2001 on September 13, 2010 at 10:56 PM
The difference between the ruling class and the rest of us is that we don’t let our deficits get into the i squared range. We do that by making sure we are not wasting the $5-$35 on unnecessary spending. We realize that cutting out those minor daily expenditures, we save $5400 on our yearly budget. +5% of a savings on a yearly budget by merely cutting out the large double mocha latte frappe; or the market tested and approved designer bottled waters; or even the modest family diner out?
Surely you jest AP:
You’re damn right it is! And with even your intentional stoking of an issue for a higher page-view count, you trivialize the institutionalized reckless spending mindset that is wrecking this country.
bains on September 13, 2010 at 10:59 PM
cane_loader … I completely agree. Yep those dispersants were banned in the UK.
Texas Gal on September 13, 2010 at 11:02 PM
Prorated, that would be $216K/year. Cheaper than most of the jobs created!
Tzetzes on September 13, 2010 at 11:33 PM
Thanks for letting us know about this, cane.
BTW, Allah, a nitpick, but i-squared is not imaginary. It is -1. Are you trying to say that this is not an imaginary number, though? It is unclear.
Scott H on September 14, 2010 at 7:38 AM
i^2 is not an imaginary number.
Where do I go to get my cookie, please?
aaah, crap. Scott H, you magnificent b@stard, you beat me to it.
Troll Feeder on September 14, 2010 at 9:13 AM
The Administration also spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to teach African men (men in Africa) how to properly clean their genitals. (Supposedly as an AIDs prevention measure). Your tax dollars hard at work.
eaglewingz08 on September 14, 2010 at 1:38 PM
No, what pisses me off, is that the media monitoring business(actually called Broadcast Archiving, Research and Analysis) is a very precise and technical enterprise that a very small number of entrepreneur’s engage in for a living and we do have international industry standards. We have very strict guidelines for research and analysis and a fortune invested in databases to organize and present this type of information to clients…. we don’t just sit around and “watch the news” and decide what it means.
The PR company is correct that the work could be done on a contract with one of a number of companies with offices in the region, although their pricing was a little off depending on the depth, reach and content of the reports required. This guy just made my job a lot harder.
2nd Ammendment Mother on September 14, 2010 at 3:42 PM