AK Libertarians: It’s probably not happening

posted at 9:30 am on September 8, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Lisa Murkowski maintained her desperate pursuit of the Libertarian Party nomination to salvage her Senate career, but just as in dating, desperation is not a political aphrodisiac.  After a meeting with the Alaskan party’s current nominee David Haase to convince him to withdraw and allow her to represent a party whose main policy preferences she has routinely opposed, the state Libertarian Party chair noted that a switch now would be almost unthinkable:

Sen. Lisa Murkowski met with Libertarian candidate for U.S. Senate David Haase on Tuesday to talk about taking his place and running on the Libertarian ticket. But Alaska Libertarian Party Chairman Scott Kolhaas said after the meeting that “I don’t think it’s happening.” …

For Murkowski to run as a Libertarian, Haase would have to step aside and the party would need to reverse its vote barring her from the ticket.

“It would be a serious flip-flop,” party chairman Kohlhaas said. “And I don’t think it’s happening.”

The Libertarians point out that Murkowski’s voting pattern hardly represents the kind of politician they champion.  Murkowski has backed the war on drugs, the war in Iraq, and the TARP bailout.  Murkowski has since said she regretted that latter vote, but that came mainly in the context of her primary challenge from Joe Miller.

This looks a lot like barking up a very wrong tree.  Big-L Libertarians aren’t really known for their pragmatic approach to politics, which is why Big-L Libertarians don’t win many elections.  If the party was open to compromise to win seats, they would already have candidates like Joe Miller winning races for them rather than for Republicans.  The Libertarian Party leadership adheres to their principles so closely that they could challenge Super Glue for effectiveness.

Even if they were inclined to play the half-a-loaf game to win a seat, Murkowski isn’t really their type — and not just because of her voting record in the Senate, although that would be enough.  She also represents dynasty politics, a concept that rubs true Libertarians the wrong way (well, in most cases, the Pauls being an exception).  Plus, in this situation, it’s quite obvious that Murkowski cares a lot less for libertarian principles than for the principle of Lisa Murkowski’s career.  But the entire courtship plays well for the Libertarians; they haven’t had this kind of political profile in ages, if ever.  Why not keep Murkowski’s interest going as long as they can?

Murkowski would be better advised to accept this defeat and plan for 2014.  Despite the well-earned cheering over Miller’s win, Murkowski was actually a pretty solid Republican in the Senate and had a voting record most would consider reliably conservative, with a couple of notable exceptions.  Instead of undermining that with a desperate attempt to keep her grasp on power, Murkowski could aim for a return to the upper chamber by beating Democrat Mark Begich, who won only because of prosecutorial misconduct against the late Ted Stevens.  And Republicans would probably welcome her back by that point.

Update: I changed the title of the post to include the word “probably.”  Haase and Kohlhaas haven’t ruled it out, but it doesn’t sound very likely.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

“I don’t think it’s happening” does not equal “it’s not happening”

faraway on September 8, 2010 at 9:35 AM

Even considering Murkowski was a jump the shark moment for LP in AK.

Monica on September 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM

If the Libertarians did back Murkowski, they should just rename themselves the Charlie Crist party.

rbj on September 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM

Instead of undermining that with a desperate attempt to keep her grasp on power, Murkowski could aim for a return to the upper chamber by beating Democrat Mark Begich, who won only because of prosecutorial misconduct against the late Ted Stevens.

Don’t pull a Charlie Crist… who should have saved his money for 2012.

ninjapirate on September 8, 2010 at 9:38 AM

Reliably conservative doesn’t atone for the unwillingness to just accept defeat as decided by the people Murkowski is supposed to represent.

I don’t care which party they belong to, if a rep has been voted out then they need to leave with dignity and move on. This wretched grasping at toeholds to keep a seat at the trough is unseemly.

Bishop on September 8, 2010 at 9:38 AM

But but but she is only doing this because the people are begging her to. She said so, so it must be true. Really, it’s not about her but about the people.

I Want You To Want Me

GnuBreed on September 8, 2010 at 9:39 AM

Begich < Murkowski < Miller

2014 should be fun.

Abby Adams on September 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM

The fact that this woman even considered a run as a libertarian is all I need to know about her.There is no honor in trying to win by throwing away your party and begging another for the spot. She has shown her true colors.She is a political pariah.

sandee on September 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM

Murkowski would be better advised to accept this defeat and plan for 2014. Despite the well-earned cheering over Miller’s win, Murkowski was actually a pretty solid Republican in the Senate and had a voting record most would consider reliably conservative, with a couple of notable exceptions. Instead of undermining that with a desperate attempt to keep her grasp on power, Murkowski could aim for a return to the upper chamber by beating Democrat Mark Begich, who won only because of prosecutorial misconduct against the late Ted Stevens. And Republicans would probably welcome her back by that point.

Murkowski is too obsessed with power and her own bruised ego to take that route. Crist could’ve done the exact same thing and waited til 2012 to challenge Nelson for the other Florida Senate seat. I’ll bet even Rubio would’ve endorsed him in 2 years.

Instead these politicians are looking out for their own self-interest and burning all their bridges with both the party leaders and the voters in the process.

Doughboy on September 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM

Fox News reported she’s launching a “write in” campaign.

Marcus on September 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Fox News reported she’s launching a “write in” campaign.

Marcus on September 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Is she seriously this desperate? Let it go, Lisa. Who wants to wager whether or not she gets fewer votes than “Lizard People”?

Doughboy on September 8, 2010 at 9:43 AM

Fox News reported she’s launching a “write in” campaign.

Marcus on September 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

If that is true she is even more pathetic than I thought.

sandee on September 8, 2010 at 9:43 AM

David Letterman – Lisa Murkowski: separated at birth.

AubieJon on September 8, 2010 at 9:45 AM

Fox News reported she’s launching a “write in” campaign.

Marcus on September 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Maybe she can have her name legally changed to “___________”

faraway on September 8, 2010 at 9:47 AM

If the libertarian party wants to be known as the Soros funded home for Republican rejects, go ahead. Libertarians are better than this I hope.

Angry Dumbo on September 8, 2010 at 9:47 AM

Who wants to wager whether or not she gets fewer votes than “Lizard People”?

Doughboy on September 8, 2010 at 9:43 AM

Probably will, but not more than Seemore Butts.

abobo on September 8, 2010 at 9:47 AM

Fox News reported she’s launching a “write in” campaign.
Marcus on September 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

And if that doesn’t work then Murkowski will push a bill in the senate which will outlaw Alaskan senators being voted out of office. This is pathetic.

Bishop on September 8, 2010 at 9:47 AM

…the state Libertarian Party chair noted that a switch now would be almost unthinkable

The Libertarian Party leadership adheres to their principles so closely that they could challenge Super Glue for effectiveness.

Well except this band of goofs. They couldn’t challenge a band-aid. As a small-l libertarian, I have voted for the big-L candidates on occasion when the RINO was about the same as the Dem, but it’s rare when the Libertarian Party fields a sharp candidate. I never vote democrat except to dabble in their primaries (Hillary).

cartooner on September 8, 2010 at 9:49 AM

She really doesn’t want to live in Alaska anymore does she?

Cindy Munford on September 8, 2010 at 9:49 AM

Murkowski would be better advised to accept this defeat and plan for 2014.

This is the part that really gets me, that I just can’t undertand. Just as was the case with Crist, as noted by other commenters, these two politicians are not old. They would be heavily favored for the next Senate elections which are not all that far away. Why the rush to stay in office right now?

The only explanation I can see that makes any sense: for a liberal Republican, the true enemy is the Conservative, not the Democrat. And that is just plain rotten, if true.

jwolf on September 8, 2010 at 9:51 AM

Do we really need multiple pictures of Murkowski on the front page?

She’s ummm, pretty unforgettable.

mudskipper on September 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM

I’d keep an eye on the Alaska Democrat Party offices. Just sayin’.

steveegg on September 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM

Excellent analysis and conclusion, Ed.

I want more photos of Governor Palin. I could look at that lady and read her positions all day….I just can’t listen to her.

IlikedAUH2O on September 8, 2010 at 9:59 AM

and the TARP bailout. Murkowski has since said she regretted that latter vote

…..

Keep the laughs coming, Murky.

Bye.

artist on September 8, 2010 at 10:00 AM

And Republicans would probably welcome her back by that point.

…..

Oh, no doubt about it.

The establishment types would be all over it.

The grassroots, not so much.

She should *NEVER* be supported as an R again.

EVER.

artist on September 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM

Fox News reported she’s launching a “write in” campaign.

Marcus on September 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Because she wants to siphon off just enough votes to get the democrat elected? This is the very definition of ‘sore loser’.

Vashta.Nerada on September 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM

Just the fact they cannot make a definitive statement on what is going to happen says alot about libertarians and RINOs. Betraying their base seems something they both have in common. Compromise your beliefs in hopes of being relevant is political BS that seems to be their standard operating procedure.

volsense on September 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM

I would hope that the Libertarians of Alaska are just giving her a fair hearing. Yet, the lack of a flat rejection at this point makes the Libertarians sound more desperate than her.

Saltysam on September 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM

She can’t let go of the graft.

tom0508 on September 8, 2010 at 10:03 AM

“Murkowski would be better advised to accept this defeat and plan for 2014.”
Wouldn’t that be 2016?

KS Rex on September 8, 2010 at 10:05 AM

Fox News reported she’s launching a “write in” campaign.

Marcus on September 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

just proves that a RINO will go to any lengths to stop a conservative from winning. Next Lisa will do a Dede and back the dem candidate….

unseen on September 8, 2010 at 10:06 AM

“Murkowski would be better advised to accept this defeat and plan for 2014.”
Wouldn’t that be 2016?

KS Rex on September 8, 2010 at 10:05 AM

the dem is up for reelection in 2012. He won the 2008 race against stevens.

unseen on September 8, 2010 at 10:09 AM

Marcus on September 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Not finding any confirmation of that.

steveegg on September 8, 2010 at 10:10 AM

“Murkowski would be better advised to accept this defeat and plan for 2014.”
Wouldn’t that be 2016?

KS Rex on September 8, 2010 at 10:05 AM

the dem is up for reelection in 2012. He won the 2008 race against stevens.

unseen on September 8, 2010 at 10:09 AM

It would be 2014 that Begich is up for re-election. It’s a 6-year term.

steveegg on September 8, 2010 at 10:10 AM

How much classier (and ultimately better for her long-term career) would it have been for her to simply say that she enjoyed her time serving the public in Alaska, but that the voters have spoken and she now fully supports the Rupublican candidate?

If she did that, she probably could have easily run for a different position in the near future and won. Now, she’s making a joke of herself.

DrAllecon on September 8, 2010 at 10:13 AM

Instead of undermining that with a desperate attempt to keep her grasp on power, Murkowski could aim for a return to the upper chamber by beating Democrat Mark Begich, who won only because of prosecutorial misconduct against the late Ted Stevens. And Republicans would probably welcome her back by that point.

This is the problem. Instead of her setting her sights on 2014, she is desperate to preserve her seniority position in the caucus. She doesn’t want to start over again.

It is also probably in no small part very personal between the Murky faction and the Palin faction. She is extremely peeved at Palin and Miller for even challenging her at all, much less pulling it off. She has not yet forgiven Palin for knocking her dad out of the Governor’s office either.

This is not about Alaska, this is about her personal entitlements and grudges.

I think a better option would be to start focusing on recruiting another honorable conservative candidate for 2014 that none of us know about right now to knock off Begich. Get to it, Sarah. We are counting on you.

The Murkys need to just go home.
It is someone else’s turn now.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 10:21 AM

It would be 2014 that Begich is up for re-election. It’s a 6-year term.

steveegg on September 8, 2010 at 10:10 AM

yeap you’re right. need more caffine

unseen on September 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM

I think a better option would be to start focusing on recruiting another honorable conservative candidate for 2014 that none of us know about right now to knock off Begich. Get to it, Sarah. We are counting on you.

The Murkys need to just go home.
It is someone else’s turn now.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 10:21 AM

Oh would that be sweet. and if Palin is POTUS in 2014 her coattails will ensure her candidates win.

unseen on September 8, 2010 at 10:24 AM

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 10:21 AM

Can you say Sen. Parnell?

unseen on September 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM

I just thought of someone who, if they wanted to serve, would be a terrific candidate for Senate in 2014.

The man Palin appointed to the State Attorney General spot, and who is currently serving in that capacity.

His name is Dan Sullivan, and he has a very impressive resume as well. A military veteran, attorney, and has served in a national security position in Bush43′s White House before coming back to Alaska.

He would be awesome, if he wanted to do it after leaving the AG office.

Just a thought.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 10:27 AM

If they ran her, then they would lose any respect.

jeffn21 on September 8, 2010 at 10:29 AM

Biography of Alaska Attorney General
Daniel S. Sullivan

Daniel S. Sullivan was appointed Attorney General of Alaska by Governor Sarah Palin on June 16, 2009, and unanimously confirmed by the state Legislature on April 9.

As Attorney General, Sullivan is the state’s chief law enforcement officer, ……..

Federal Government Service

Prior to becoming Attorney General, Sullivan served as the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs. His nomination by the President for this position was unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate in May 2006 and he served until January 2009. In this role, he was a senior advisor to the Secretary of State and other top U.S. government officials on the formulation and execution of international economic, energy, trade, finance, transportation, telecommunications and Arctic policies. Sullivan also led and managed the 200-employee State Department Bureau of Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs.

As the Assistant Secretary of State, much of Sullivan’s work focused on international energy issues. He served as the U.S. Governing Board member of the Paris-based International Energy Agency – the world’s premier energy security organization. He and the State Department bureau he led worked closely with the Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects on Alaska gas pipeline issues. Sullivan also was responsible for overseeing and leading several complex international negotiations of strategic importance to the United States, including serving as the primary negotiator for the President at the Group of Eight (G8) Summits.

Prior to serving as the Assistant Secretary of State, Sullivan was a Director in the International Economics Directorate of the National Security Council and National Economic Council staffs at the White House

U.S. Military Service

Sullivan has served in the United States Marine Corps since 1993 on active duty and in the reserves as an infantry and reconnaissance officer, including with Second Battalion, Fifth Marines at Camp Pendleton, California, and for several years with Anchorage-based Echo Company, Fourth Reconnaissance Battalion – the Marine Corps Reserve’s premier cold weather reconnaissance unit. In recent years, Sullivan has been recalled to active duty twice: in January 2009 to help draft a regional strategy report for the Commander of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) General David Petraeus, and from December 2004 until April 2006 to serve as a strategic advisor to CENTCOM Commander General John Abizaid. During this period, Sullivan spent substantial time deployed in the CENTCOM theater of operations. He now serves in the U.S. Marine Corps’ active reserves with the 4th Marine Division’s Anti-Terrorist Battalion.

Academic Background

Sullivan graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University, earning a bachelors degree in Economics, where he was a Harvard College Scholar (3.5 GPA or higher) during each of his four years. Sullivan graduated cum laude from Georgetown University Law Center, earning a Juris Doctor and Masters of Science in Foreign Service joint degree. He was an articles editor on the Georgetown Law Journal and a contributing author to the Georgetown Criminal Procedure Project. During his final year at Georgetown, Sullivan worked as a law clerk/intern for Judge James L. Buckley on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Awards, Honors, and Personal Information

Sullivan is the recipient of numerous professional, academic, and military awards, including the White House Fellowship, the National Security Council Outstanding Service Award, and the Defense Meritorious Service Medal. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Sullivan was born in Fairview Park, Ohio. He has been married for 15 years to Julie Fate Sullivan of Fairbanks. They moved to Alaska in 1997, after Sullivan completed active duty service with the Marine Corps. They have three daughters, two of whom were born in Anchorage.

This man would destroy Murky in a primary.

He has state wide name recognition because of his AG position, and is a really likeable guy who knows his stuff.

He already has the Sarah Stamp of Approval, and would be a great candidate for US Senate in 2014.

If he decided to run, Begich would be toast.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 10:32 AM

Can you say Sen. Parnell?

unseen on September 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM

In 2014, Gov Sean Parnell should be running for his second term as Governor.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 10:33 AM

Daddy? Why can’t I have my seat back???
/@Lisa

ted c on September 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM

She also represents dynasty politics, a concept that rubs true Libertarians the wrong way (well, in most cases, the Pauls being an exception)

Rand Paul is not running for his father’s House seat. He isn’t even running in the same state.

The Monster on September 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM

This is the problem. Instead of her setting her sights on 2014, she is desperate to preserve her seniority position in the caucus. She doesn’t want to start over again.

It is also probably in no small part very personal between the Murky faction and the Palin faction. She is extremely peeved at Palin and Miller for even challenging her at all, much less pulling it off. She has not yet forgiven Palin for knocking her dad out of the Governor’s office either.

This is not about Alaska, this is about her personal entitlements and grudges.

I think a better option would be to start focusing on recruiting another honorable conservative candidate for 2014 that none of us know about right now to knock off Begich. Get to it, Sarah. We are counting on you.

The Murkys need to just go home.
It is someone else’s turn now.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 10:21 AM

Actually, Sarah Palin already recruited Sean Parnell to be her Lieutenant Governor, who is now Governor due to Palin’s resignation. Parnell is probably a shoo-in for re-election this year, but his second term will be up in 2014, just when Mark Begich(D) is up for re-election.

But that’s a long time from now. Lisa Murkowski needs to lick her wounds and accept defeat like a big girl, and do everything possible to support Joe Miller for Senate. It’s a long shot for Republicans to pick up a net 10 seats to control the Senate next year–we can’t afford to lose Alaska.

Steve Z on September 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM

Murkowski would be better advised to accept this defeat and plan for 2014

But that may mean she would actually have to get out and work in the private sector…God forbid, a bureaucrat actually having to work with us peons…

right2bright on September 8, 2010 at 11:22 AM

And Republicans would probably welcome her back by that point.

Even in a sparsely populated state like Alaska there must be better options than Murkowski. Maybe someone who never tried to jump parties to save their political a$$.

Extrafishy on September 8, 2010 at 11:28 AM

This election cycle has made one thing abundantly clear. At their core, most politicians have enormous egos. And when they’re bruised – as in losing a primary – these politicians behave erratically; witness Spector, Crist, Scozzafava, and now Murkowski. Whomever we elect Nov 2nd will need to be kept on a short leash. The fact that these sore losers chant that they switched parties or ran independent (Leiberman excluded) because they only had their constituents true interests at heart is pure hogwash.

Bob in VA on September 8, 2010 at 11:29 AM

Actually, Sarah Palin already recruited Sean Parnell to be her Lieutenant Governor, who is now Governor due to Palin’s resignation. Parnell is probably a shoo-in for re-election this year, but his second term will be up in 2014, just when Mark Begich(D) is up for re-election.

Steve Z on September 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM

Actually, you are wrong. Sean Parnell is Governor now, finishing Sarah’s term out. He is running for his first full term as Governor this year.
His first elected term will be up in 2014, when he will be eligible to run for his second full term as Governor. Which he will probably do.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 11:37 AM

Update: I changed the title of the post to include the word “probably.” Haase and Kohlhaas haven’t ruled it out, but it doesn’t sound very likely.

And at 7:41 AM in the morning… how the hell would the east coast know? Half of Alaska is just starting to wake up.

upinak on September 8, 2010 at 11:42 AM

Which he will probably do.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 11:37 AM

No I think he is going out for Begich or Young.

upinak on September 8, 2010 at 11:42 AM

Actually, Sarah Palin already recruited Sean Parnell to be her Lieutenant Governor,
Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 11:37 AM

Please show me proof of that. Since Alaskans vote for the LT Gov.

upinak on September 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM

Please show me proof of that. Since Alaskans vote for the LT Gov.

upinak on September 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM

This is a little confusing, since my name is on a statement from SteveZ that I was quoting.

My point was that Parnell is now running for his first term, and would be eligible for a second in 2014.

If he decides to go for a DC seat instead, that’s up to him.

If he wants another 4 years as Gov, he can do that too.

What do you think of the possibility of Dan Sullivan running against Begich in 2014?

From where I am observing, he looks like a great candidate for Senate to knock off the Democrat.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 11:55 AM

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 11:55 AM

sorry Brain, grabbed the wrong name.

Steve Z on September 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM

That is the guy!

What do you think of the possibility of Dan Sullivan running against Begich in 2014?

I don’t, I think he is going to run for Gov when Parnell leaves.

upinak on September 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM

I don’t, I think he is going to run for Gov when Parnell leaves.

upinak on September 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Well, he would be a great Gov candidate too.

I just assumed that Parnell would run again, and Sullivan would be free to consider taking out Begich. Sullivan has been around Washington before, and has some connections there already through his service in the Bush43 administration.

He would make a great Senator, IMO.

If it works out the reverse, that would be OK too.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM

If Murkowski runs as a libertarian against Miller, she has permenantly burned her bridges back to the Republican party in the same way Crist has done in Florida.

Good riddence to both of them.

Corky Boyd on September 8, 2010 at 12:08 PM

“Murkowski would be better advised to accept this defeat and plan for 2014.”

You mean 2016?

GDLL on September 8, 2010 at 12:08 PM

You mean 2016?

GDLL on September 8, 2010 at 12:08 PM

No 2014. AKA Begich… who is up for re-election in 2014.

upinak on September 8, 2010 at 12:14 PM

You mean 2016?

GDLL on September 8, 2010 at 12:08 PM

2008+6=2014

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 12:15 PM

Rasmussen shows McAdams trailing Miller by 6 points. So all Murkowski has to do is i) get on the ballot and ii) get more than 6% of the vote and it’s “Hello, Senator McAdams.” I’m just sayin’…

factoid on September 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM

Party switching – write in campaign; it appears more and more that it is all about Lisa Murkowski. No party loyalty here. She is headed for the trash heap. Another Arlen Specter.

scrubjay on September 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM

Murkowski could aim for a return to the upper chamber by beating Democrat Mark Begich, who won only because of prosecutorial misconduct against the late Ted Stevens. And Republicans would probably welcome her back by that point.


I was just thinking the same thing. If she would just gracefully accept this outcome she could save face and remove one of Alaska’s bigger regrets. Murkowski is more popular than Begich.

lwssdd on September 8, 2010 at 12:53 PM

It’s disgusting to observe: Murkowski, Blanche Lincoln, Crist…how they cling to power. It is corruption pure and simple. Otherwise it couldn’t be.

The founding fathers turn in their graves and the citizens s/b very aware of such blind ambition. There’s more money and there are more perks than meet the eyes.

Schadenfreude on September 8, 2010 at 1:08 PM

I was just thinking the same thing. If she would just gracefully accept this outcome she could save face and remove one of Alaska’s bigger regrets. Murkowski is more popular than Begich.

lwssdd on September 8, 2010 at 12:53 PM

Why not find some one else to knock off Begich and leave this power-clinger retired?

That sounds better to me.

Brian1972 on September 8, 2010 at 1:19 PM

Wasn’t the August 24 primary the “write in” campaign? I’m embarassed for her.

CCRWM on September 8, 2010 at 1:34 PM

Stick a fork in her she’s done!

If Alaskans elect this slug to anything including Dog Catcher they are insane this is about herself NOT what is best for Alaska.

That is the problem with DC in a nutshell the entitled rulers play to the entitled masses with the working folks money!

dhunter on September 8, 2010 at 1:44 PM