DE Senate race has a double-digit gap …

posted at 12:15 pm on September 7, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

How badly do Republicans want to win the Senate seat from Delaware?  That’s the question that the latest Rasmussen poll poses as the candidates get ready for a primary to the special election to fill the rest of Joe Biden’s term in office.  Rep. Mike Castle, a moderate who has angered Tea Party activists nationwide with his support for cap-and-trade, nevertheless leads the Democratic nominee Chris Coons by eleven points, 48/37.  Tea Party favorite Christine O’Donnell, meanwhile, trails Coons in head-to-head polling by the same amount, 47/36:

Support for Republican Congressman Mike Castle falls just short of 50% for the third month in a row, but he continues to hold a double-digit lead over Democrat Chris Coons in Delaware’s U.S. Senate race.

The latest Rasmussen Reports statewide telephone survey of Likely Voters shows Castle earning 48% of the vote, while Coons gets 37% support. Six percent (6%) prefer some other candidate, and nine percent (9%) remain undecided. …

Coons leads conservative activist Christine O’Donnell, who is challenging Castle for the GOP Senate nomination in a primary next Tuesday, by a 47% to 36% margin. Given that matchup, eight percent (8%) prefer another candidate, while nine percent (9%) are undecided.

Last month, Coons held a similar 46% to 36% lead over O’Donnell after the candidates were virtually tied in July.

With eight weeks to go, a double-digit gap will be almost impossible to overcome, especially for a conservative Republican in a moderate state.  O’Donnell has stumbled over the summer against Coons while gaining some traction against Castle.  Some polls have suggested that the primary fight may be a dead heat.  With a week to go, both candidates will come out swinging in an effort to represent the GOP in the general election seven weeks later.

Will a primary win help O’Donnell solidify Republican support and beat Coons?  According to the internals of the Rasmussen poll, it’s not likely.  Castle actually gets more of the GOP vote against Coons (71/16) than does O’Donnell (63/20).  Castle also gets more of the Democratic vote (33%) than O’Donnell (16%), and independents as well (42/33, versus 37/43 for O’Donnell).

This really shouldn’t surprise anyone.  Delaware is not a red state; it’s usually a reliably blue state, especially in presidential elections.  They sent the explicitly liberal Biden to Washington for almost all of the VP’s adult life, and that was no accident.  In the era of Hope and Change, Delaware voters have begun to balk at the Democratic agenda, with a third of Democrats looking towards Castle rather than Coons, but that doesn’t make it a fertile ground for Tea Party candidates, either.  That doesn’t mean that Tea Party activists shouldn’t back O’Donnell if they feel Castle is too objectionable (and his cap-and-trade vote makes for a good argument along those lines), but don’t expect O’Donnell to pull off a big upset against Coons in November, either.

The question comes down to this: is it better to gain control of the Senate with Mike Castle in the caucus, or to miss that chance with Coons in the Senate instead?  And that may not have any easy answers, either.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 8:07 PM

Actually Castle votes with conservatives about 28% of the time and swerves to the right on election years only.

Castle does live his life as a responsible, accountable person with integrity and responsibility.
I do recognize those as conservative values–don’t you?

No I don’t.

Accountability, responsibility, and integrity doesn’t involve destroying the lives of future generations and buying political power with other peoples money.

There are Democrats who are more conservative than Castle and that tells me you do not care who he is, only that you have been told to back him due to party affiliation.

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 8:15 PM

Actually Castle votes with conservatives about 28% of the time and swerves to the right on election years only.

No, as Geraghty notes, his ACU rating is 56%.
I know you must have read that piece because you commented on that thread.

I do recognize those as conservative values–don’t you?

No I don’t.

Then, what do you recognize as conservative values?

Accountability, responsibility, and integrity doesn’t involve destroying the lives of future generations and buying political power with other peoples money.

Stop being so dramatic!
Just because Castle voted for cap and trade hardly amounts to “destroying the lives of future generations!”
Besides, cap and trade is dead.
As for “buying political power with others peoples money,” you have no idea whether this is true.
In fact, I think you should prove it.
Given the fact that the man has served the state of DE for 40 years, I think his voters would know if he was crooked or not by now.

There are Democrats who are more conservative than Castle and that tells me you do not care who he is, only that you have been told to back him due to party affiliation.

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 8:15 PM

There are not “Democrats who are more conservative than Castle” and it’s just plain silly to say so.

And you are backing Christine because she babbles about being a conservative and tells you what you want to hear when she lives like a thief, a liar and a fraud.
You apparently don’t care who she is.

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 8:22 PM

No, as Geraghty notes, his ACU rating is 56%.
I know you must have read that piece because you commented on that thread.

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 8:22 PM

Yes, and Geraghty is being deceitful.

Castle’s 2008 rating was 28.

You can look it up…
http://www.conservative.org/ratings/ratingsarchive/2009/House%20Ratings.htm

He went rightward as he was facing an election year. Same crap McCain pulled with his sudden conversion.

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 8:29 PM

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at all day all time

You know you are not convincing people, right? Especially with your tactics and ‘arguments’ so far.

What is your beef? People learned to bypass your comments, because you just sounded too shrilling.

You only have one vote (if you can vote here in the closed primary), like every other DE voter. State your preference if you must, but all I hear is the same thing not dissimilar from the left.

Sir Napsalot on September 7, 2010 at 8:44 PM

Has anyone looked as Sarah Palin’s twitter page in the last ten minutes.

You’re all in for a big surprise.

victor82 on September 7, 2010 at 8:55 PM

HeyTammyBruce @marklevinshow Thank you so much for that RT ;) It is appreciated! @ChristineOD is great, her election must a major focus for us all about 1 hour ago via web Retweeted by SarahPalinUSA and 7 others

You mean this?

Has anyone looked as Sarah Palin’s twitter page in the last ten minutes.

You’re all in for a big surprise.

victor82 on September 7, 2010 at 8:55 PM

Well… Sarah Palin is crazy… and she had money troubles, and there was that interview with Katie Couric…

And she a vampire just like O’Donnell.

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 8:59 PM

…don’t expect O’Donnell to pull off a big upset against Coons in November, either. Ed

Why the hell not?

With T-party Pats in her corner, the pollsters mojo becomes just so much mumbo jumbo! Besides, Christine O’Donnell is the woman in this race-hear them roar! And, the more the GOP pissants try to attack her rep, the more votes she’ll get as an underdog! Comon Palin, jump in the waters choppy, but that didn’t deter General Washington!

“Let’s Roll”

On Watch on September 7, 2010 at 9:01 PM

She even bought a $540 mattress with her campaign funds from the Tea Party Express.

Isn’t that nice?

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM

She did ???? Well to hell with her then !!!

I say let’s vote that old Lib-fart Casshole ! !!

If we’re gonna lose let’s lose big !

cableguy615 on September 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM

HeyTammyBruce @marklevinshow Thank you so much for that RT ;) It is appreciated! @ChristineOD is great, her election must a major focus for us all

The link….
http://twitter.com/sarahpalinusa

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 9:10 PM

Is that really necessary?

DaydreamBeliever on September 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM

Not at all, but I thought it was pretty funny. Come on — name another politician who paid for a mattress with their Senatorial campaign funds.

Jaibones on September 7, 2010 at 9:40 PM

The link….
http://twitter.com/sarahpalinusa

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 9:10 PM

I was really hoping Sarah wouldn’t do this, but at least it’s only a Tweet and not a full FB Note endorsement with a request to send her campaign money!

Plus, Tammy Bruce is all over the place politically: she apparently supports any woman running for office (especially if TB finds them attractive *cough*lesbianlust*cough).
Tammy’s a former Leftist and Democrat, never forget that and O’Donnell’s the DNC’s best hope for a Coons victory in DE.
I can assure you that Tammy couldn’t give 2 figs that Christine is pro-life because she’s big on abortion still.

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 10:04 PM

There are Democrats who are more conservative than Castle and that tells me you do not care who he is, only that you have been told to back him due to party affiliation.

I think the question is really, is Coons more conservative than Castle?

Voyager on September 7, 2010 at 10:13 PM

I can assure you that Tammy couldn’t give 2 figs that Christine is pro-life because she’s big on abortion still.

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 10:04 PM

Neither do you!

The National Right to Life Committee gives Castle a 10% rating on abortion issues. At least Tammy Bruce is supporting the pro-life candidate which is more than you can say.

Tammy’s a former Leftist and Democrat, never forget that and O’Donnell’s the DNC’s best hope for a Coons victory in DE.

So a former leftist who saw the light is supporting the conservative candidate and you are supporting the liberal one, and this leads you to imagine she is what…? A secret Democratic agent hoping for Coons to win?

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 10:16 PM

I think the question is really, is Coons more conservative than Castle?

Voyager on September 7, 2010 at 10:13 PM

An interesting question. He would have to work at it to be more liberal than Castle.

Does anyone know the answer to that?

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 10:19 PM

Mark levin was up in some face today on his show. Didn’t name names but it was apprent he is talking about Allah/Ed and others about supporting Mike Castle/Mcain etc.
He made some good points. Took them to the woodshed really

kangjie on September 7, 2010 at 10:54 PM

http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/castle-odonnell-coons.jpg

Ahh finally,

a forced choice between
two lib baldys and a babe!

Now, that’s a no brainer!
And I understand she bought
an air mattress, from Rush?

“Let’s Roll”

On Watch on September 7, 2010 at 11:00 PM

Neither do you!

I care very much about pro-Life but I don’t believe a single thing this O’Donnell chick says.

The National Right to Life Committee gives Castle a 10% rating on abortion issues.

Castle voted against partial birth abortion twice and voted against federal funding of abortion under ObamaCare, as well as fed funding of overseas abortions.

At least Tammy Bruce is supporting the pro-life sexually attractive candidate which is more than you can say.

FIFY.

So a former leftist who saw the light is supporting the conservative candidate and you are supporting the liberal one,

No, I’m supporting the Republican one.

and this leads you to imagine she is what…?

A lying Democrat.

A secret Democratic agent hoping for Coons to win?

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 10:16 PM

Yep.
And that she might get a date out of it someday.

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 11:04 PM

Just because Castle voted for cap and trade hardly amounts to “destroying the lives of future generations!”

That is EXACTLY what Cap and Trade will do. It will seriously compromise the financial well being of all Americans for generations to come.

Besides, cap and trade is dead.

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 8:22 PM

To paraphrase Blotto: “Nothing is ever dead until the Democrats say it’s dead.” There are a lot of powerful Dems pushing C&T. We can’t risk electing a RINO who voted for it, and likely will again.

UltimateBob on September 7, 2010 at 11:08 PM

I think it would be better if the Dems keep control of the Senate. Otherwise Obama’s permanent campaign – the media – will blame all that has gone wrong due to their own misguided classroom fantasies, on the GOP, irrespective of how long the Dems have been driving legislation.
.
Furthermore, there are still too many squishy Republicans in the Senate. If they get it back, they will likely try to placate the coastal elites – the media – after being bombarded by all the propaganda foisting the “tea-party is crazy/reactionary/bigoted/racist…” meme. McCain et al need to be re-introduced to the USA that they have forgotten about during all those Ruling Class cocktail parties.
.
In other words, I’d rather see Castle go down in the primary than having another Lincoln Chafee lending cover for the Ruling Class Media.

bains on September 7, 2010 at 11:18 PM

We can’t risk electing a RINO who voted for it, and likely will again.

UltimateBob on September 7, 2010 at 11:08 PM

Cap and trade will never be passed by the Senate.
In fact, I seriously doubt that it will even go up for a vote.
It’s dead, Jim.
And we can’t risk throwing away our vote on a liar and a cheat like O’Donnell when we know that Castle will vote with the Republicans (especially if they take the Senate, too) at least 50-80% of the time.
I will not support a candidate who is going to spend my conservative dollars intended for her campaign on a mattress.

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM

Not at all, but I thought it was pretty funny. Come on — name another politician who paid for a mattress with their Senatorial campaign funds.

Jaibones on September 7, 2010 at 9:40 PM

Love it, Jb!

Jenfidel on September 7, 2010 at 11:45 PM

think it would be better if the Dems keep control of the Senate. Otherwise Obama’s permanent campaign – the media – will blame all that has gone wrong due to their own misguided classroom fantasies, on the GOP, irrespective of how long the Dems have been driving legislation.
.
Furthermore, there are still too many squishy Republicans in the Senate. If they get it back, they will likely try to placate the coastal elites – the media – after being bombarded by all the propaganda foisting the “tea-party is crazy/reactionary/bigoted/racist…” meme. McCain et al need to be re-introduced to the USA that they have forgotten about during all those Ruling Class cocktail parties.
.
In other words, I’d rather see Castle go down in the primary than having another Lincoln Chafee lending cover for the Ruling Class Media.

bains on September 7, 2010 at 11:18 PM

This would be the correct answer my friends.

kangjie on September 8, 2010 at 1:09 AM

Uh, I vote for the hot chick, shallow lad that I am.

Amendment X on September 8, 2010 at 1:43 AM

Would Castle vote to repeal ObamaCare?

Would Castle vote to repeal the Frank-Dodd Act?

Would Castle vote to cut Federal Spending?

Would Castle vote to impeach AG Holden over the politicization of the DoJ (which includes spiking the New Black Panther voter intimidation case), and the political prosecution of AZ over immigration enforcement?

Would Castle vote to impeach Interior Sec. Salazar over the drilling moratorium?

What would be the point of voting for Castle, again?

LarryD on September 8, 2010 at 8:53 AM

Yes, and Geraghty is being deceitful.

Castle’s 2008 rating was 28.

You can look it up…
http://www.conservative.org/ratings/ratingsarchive/2009/House%20Ratings.htm

He went rightward as he was facing an election year. Same crap McCain pulled with his sudden conversion.

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 8:29 PM

No, actually you’re being deceitful.

Castle has a better than 50% lifetime rating from ACU

An interesting question. He would have to work at it to be more liberal than Castle.

sharrukin on September 7, 2010 at 10:19 PM

That is complete nonsense.

Dreadnought on September 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM

Look at the issues:

- cap and trade – Castle voted for it

- stimulus – Castle voted for it

- TARP – Castle voted for it

Castle has a record of supporting reckless spending. He must run on his record. Call it what you will. Castle cannot run from the Obama Agenda because he supports the Obama Agenda. Precious few Republicans have supported the Keynesian Obama Agenda as consistently as Mike Castle has.

Angry Dumbo on September 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM

Wouldn’t it be really neat if the voters of Delaware decided this race? Who is right on the issues? That’s the question.

Sacrificing principles because of a desire to win is making this country less conservative, not more conservative. A general election loss may very well be a lesson learned that will be corrected next go-around.

Lisa

gocatholic on September 8, 2010 at 11:29 PM

As a point of fact, Castle’s 28 rating year was 2008, which WAS an election year, so the evidence says he veers LEFT in election years to appease the home folk, and votes far more conservative in the off years to make the overall 56.67 average – NOT the other way around.
`
~~~~~~~~~
`
`
WHO are the ones “sacrificing principles” when you ignore obvious ethical and basic honesty problems with O’Donnell, if not downright freaky. Come on – she still argues the point of her claim to have “won two of the three Counties” in 2008 (she lost them all, was only close in one), and accused the radio host of working for the RNC when he challenged her on it.
`
`
Paying her apartment rent with campaign money, bragging she has income she didn’t disclose on the form, “selling” her house to her campaign lawyer to avoid foreclosure – these are also indicators of someone who, to say it kindly, doesn’t always exercise good judgment.
`
`
What sort of “principles” must one have to support a shady character like that?

Adjoran on September 9, 2010 at 3:48 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3