Shocker: Democratic donors from 2008 going GOP in 2010
posted at 1:30 pm on September 6, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
No, it’s no shocker that Democrats have big problems in fundraising after their record from the past two years. It’s not even a shocker that Wall Street donors have shifted their money to the GOP; that started a year ago, and has only accelerated since. The news that Tony Podesta’s lobbyists have begun betting on a Senate takeover by Republicans is a little surprising. From John Byrne and Raw Story, perhaps this gives a little more credence to the idea that the GOP could take both chambers in a blowout midterm cycle:
The majority party often faces the ire of the population-at-large (and businesses) during the midterm election cycle of a new president. Democrats lost seats during the first term of President Bill Clinton.
But even the firm controlled by the brother of Clinton’s former chief of staff is shifting their donations in a conservative direction.
“Tony Podesta is one of the best-connected rainmakers in the nation’s capital, with a web of personal contacts stretching back 42 years and six Democratic presidential candidates. His brother John was Bill Clinton’s White House chief of staff and an adviser on President Barack Obama’s transition team,” the Chronicle reporters note. “But in an uncharacteristic twist this year, people at Tony Podesta’s powerhouse lobbying firm have chosen to donate $32,000 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee to help its chairman, Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, wrest control of the Senate from the Democrats.”
Cornyn and his allies have convinced a quarter of the 478 active political action committees that gave to the DSCC in 2008 to cut or eliminate donations to Democrats this year.
Think of lobbyist support as an Old School form of Intrade. They have to deal with the leadership of whichever party takes control of each chamber next year. Betting on the GOP for the House would hardly be news; Nancy Pelosi has looked doomed as Speaker for months, and that news just keeps getting worse. However, big donations to the NRSC look as though Podesta’s team thinks that the GOP have a real shot at running the Senate as well as the House in 2011. It’s hard to imagine that this shift came without the approval of Tony Podesta or even without his knowledge.
And if Podesta has given up on a Democratic-run Senate, well ….









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Are they funding RINOs?
faraway on September 6, 2010 at 1:32 PM
The Tony Podesta idiots know a sinking ship when they see one. Just don’t let them move to the Republicans to begin new manipulations.
mobydutch on September 6, 2010 at 1:35 PM
Sort of like rats deserting a sinking ship.
GarandFan on September 6, 2010 at 1:40 PM
Yeah, right now it’s the Lobbyist Defense In Depth Maneuver.
The Democrat front-line is in danger of being overrun, so they’re fortifying the second trench of Old-Line GOP Earmarkers.
But they’re sandbagging it against Tea Party attack from the rear.
JEM on September 6, 2010 at 1:41 PM
They’d better not be thinking about future favors they hope to buy.
disa on September 6, 2010 at 1:41 PM
I think at this point they’re just hoping for a fair tax plan and maybe, just maybe the repeal of the business killing ObamaCare.
To really fix health care though, something has to be done with the illegal problem. Illegals and medicare/mediaid are the basic reasons for rising health care costs.
darwin on September 6, 2010 at 1:46 PM
Politico just tweeted:
GOP smells blood in the water.
Purple Fury on September 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM
Was Clinton the previous prez? How come nobody ever mentions that in 2002 with a Republican president, the GOP won seats in the house and Senate?
angryed on September 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM
Tony Podesta’s group is giving to Republicans?
I don’t believe it.
SteveMG on September 6, 2010 at 1:50 PM
Darned straight. The GOP needs to treat these lobbyists as what they are: Mercenaries that jump on the perceived winning bandwagon. Take their money? Sure, as long as it is treated as the lobbyists supporting the GOP agenda, and not as a favor that needs to be returned. Reagan was advised to return donations from the Log Cabin Republicans, because they supported gay rights. Reagan refused, saying that they were supporting his agenda, not the other way around. The GOP needs to adopt that attitude.
iurockhead on September 6, 2010 at 1:50 PM
Obama doesn’t care about donors jumping ship when he can divert millions to his base through stimulus spending. Chicago thugs know how to “arrange” things when they have to. Getting an empty suit like Obama elected was easier than they thought. Their only bump in the road was the race card against Hillary to secure the black vote as well as 95% of the dead voters rolls to take care of her. Then the GOP cooperated by nominating a RINO that his own party detested. as usaul, the SEIU and ACORN took care of the rest.Really a slam dunk when you look at it.
volsense on September 6, 2010 at 1:51 PM
If they’re switching now, it’s basically a preemptive strike to co-opt key Senate Republicans in the run-up to 2011, to make sure that, if a meat cleaver is taken to the spending over the past two-plus years, it doesn’t affect their pet projects or clients.
Something worth quizzing those same GOP leaders and other Republican incumbents seeking re-election before Nov. 2, just to get them on record that they’re not going to simply be content to be “Democrats Lite” for the next two years, and pick winners and loses on what little there is that’s cut based on campaign donations.
jon1979 on September 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM
I see this as liberal capitalists who tried to convince Obama to slow down and failing, backing Republicans in order to send a message to Barry.
They will support Obama in the ’12 Presidential, while supporting Republican senate and House candidates to keep him at bay.
portlandon on September 6, 2010 at 1:59 PM
Don’t fall for it. These same douche nozzles also donated to the likes of Ensign and other corrupticans.
…kinda like they have a history of donating to candidates they know will end up embarrassing Conservatives.
But why do any investigating when you can just comment on what another reporter/blogger wrote.
selias on September 6, 2010 at 2:01 PM
All rats do!
bluemarlin on September 6, 2010 at 2:11 PM
The NRSC… weren’t they the ones to pledge to help Murkowski in AK after the election?
The Incumbent Senatorial Committee is more like it. If they cared only about Senators they would keep their noses out of Primaries…
ajacksonian on September 6, 2010 at 2:14 PM
The left will blame the Jews.
————-
Were the Obamas and their imbecile followers counting on the rich to be stupid too?
Schadenfreude on September 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM
We told you so. But I don’t think you care about conservatism, just buying favor with those in power (or who you think will be in power).
Philly on September 6, 2010 at 2:22 PM
Isn’t the NRSC the ones who supported Murkowski in Alaska, Bennett in Utah(?), Crist in Florida, and that crazy leftist woman in New York?
No wonder Democrat lobbyists are giving them support.
Corsair on September 6, 2010 at 2:23 PM
Did you miss the part where they were giving money to the NRSC? So, the answer is yes.
Kafir on September 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM
If Democrat politicians were collectively aflame, they wouldn’t be worthy of the urine donation it would take to save them.
NoDonkey on September 6, 2010 at 2:38 PM
My belief is that the Democrat’s strategy has been to enact their “progressive” agenda no matter what, take the losses in 2010, and then watch the Republicans screw it up when they take charge. Then, when the Democrats return in 2012 or 2014, they’ll still have their progressive agenda intact (Obama would veto any attempts to repeal their bills) and they can add to it then.
NNtrancer on September 6, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Heh
The rats are not leaving the sinking ship. They are merely sharing their cheese in friendship, to preserve the ship for all rats
entagor on September 6, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Oh no – time for an Obama speech and road trip to explain to the business world that they dont understand his policies are really helping them. Sheesh – Zero is so smart no one understands him
iam7545 on September 6, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Well, we may want spit on them…..
…. on second thought, maybe not.
Fake8 on September 6, 2010 at 2:51 PM
A huge part of the problem is that the donk states are also killing business with taxes and regulations.
Blake on September 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM
You couldn’t possible mean California, New Jersey, Illinois or Michigan?
darwin on September 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM
I don’t trust any of these cretins, but if it sends a strong message to Obama (since he cannot abide abandonment or ridicule) I’ll relish the dark storm clouds that will surely surround him for the next two years.
tru2tx on September 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM
wow, snoopy dance coming soon?
cmsinaz on September 6, 2010 at 3:12 PM
Victory disease. Ask the Emperor about it.
The dice are dice.
Limerick on September 6, 2010 at 3:31 PM
OT: Obama demonizing Republicans again in his Labor Day speech. Unbelievable.
John the Libertarian on September 6, 2010 at 3:40 PM
John the Libertarian on September 6, 2010 at 3:40 PM
How much are they paying you to listen to that clown flap his gums?
I wouldn’t take less than $100.00.
NoDonkey on September 6, 2010 at 3:51 PM
AMEN!
PattyJ on September 6, 2010 at 3:51 PM
We’re going to make sure all the video cameras are off at my house so we can do a proper victory dance on 11/2/10. It’ll be happy but ugly.
Mojave Mark on September 6, 2010 at 3:55 PM
The key here as I noted earlier is that they’re going to contribute to the NRSC to shore up the old bulls, the ones who’ll have the purse strings and committee chairs if the GOP takes over.
This is a fallback position against Dem failure, and certainly not their preferred role, but more particularly it’s to stiffen the spines of the GOP porkers against the Ken Buck/Joe Miller insurgent forces.
JEM on September 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM
Well, you know, I was just dying to hear his car-in-the-ditch metaphor again.
John the Libertarian on September 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM
FIFM
Maquis on September 6, 2010 at 4:34 PM
you got that right :)
cmsinaz on September 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM
The NRSC supports incumbents. Where the incumbent is a RINO, this is bad news for the conservative/Tea Party movement. Still, if it’s being poured in to help Cornyn, well, you could do worse.
njcommuter on September 6, 2010 at 5:19 PM
This is the perfect example of the how the marxists control both parties. They exercise alot of control on where the money goes.
The controlled opposition.
True_King on September 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM
This money stinks, but it’s still money.
Daemonocracy on September 6, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Are you a Ron Paul guy?
hawkdriver on September 6, 2010 at 6:37 PM
The smallest of shifts mean only that some few D’rats can still purchase “political insurance” from the usual suspect RINOs.
Caststeel on September 6, 2010 at 6:39 PM
” However, big donations to the NRSC look as though Podesta’s team thinks that the GOP have a real shot at running the Senate as well as the House in 2011.”
I guess it is possible that someone found the head of a horse in their bed…and it suddenly dawned on them that….
percysunshine on September 6, 2010 at 6:45 PM
I was listening to Mark Simone in for Hannity today while driving some errands. The topic or general theme was that this is all they really have left for the elections. And that is to paint the Republicans as the guys who got you into this mess and do you really want to put them back in power. Susan Estrich wasn’t even very enthusiastic about their chances of selling it.
hawkdriver on September 6, 2010 at 6:51 PM
This is NOT rats abandoning a sinking ship, it’s more like rats jumping from one garbage scow to another.
They’re all a bunch of Beltway Weasels shuffling protection money back and forth among competing cliques of their friends, trying to maintain open access to whoever comes out ahead. There is no qualitative difference between this and the byzantine machinations of every medieval court of old Europe.
The Medici’s and the Machiavelli’s would be completely at home in this over-funded cat house.
Lew on September 6, 2010 at 9:21 PM
HUMPBOT!
Laura in Maryland on September 6, 2010 at 9:54 PM
cricket chirping is becoming much more than background noise :-)
huskerdiva on September 6, 2010 at 10:28 PM
The problem with health care in the USofA, before Obamacare, is that the consumer, has been isolated from the cost. The price of all medical procedures not covered by insurance have come down, while those that are covered have gone up.
Slowburn on September 6, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Fundraising isn’t the best indicator of true political allegiance. Pretty good, yes, but not the best. When politics is a protection racket, the money will flow to whoever the “donors” think they have the most to gain from.
gryphon202 on September 6, 2010 at 10:48 PM
Why do I see all the deck chairs falling off the Titanic?
lovingmyUSA on September 7, 2010 at 1:03 AM
If the Republicans control both the House and the Senate, they can send bill after bill to Obama and if he does not sign, they brand him as the President of No. Heh.
Birdseye on September 7, 2010 at 1:25 AM
I guess if you want to find out what is really happening in the political scene…ask the whores…
right2bright on September 7, 2010 at 8:53 AM