Romer: Hey, we gave it our best shot
posted at 12:50 pm on September 4, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Christina Romer tries a little pirouette of spin on her way out of the Obama administration in this interview with PBS on her last day as chair of Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers. Romer chirps about adding 67,000 private-sector jobs and six straight months of job growth, even though she and every other economist in the US knows that anything falling below 100,000 net new jobs in a month means that population growth outstripped new jobs — in other words, falling behind. Romer also suggests that the White House has tapped out in terms of ideas on how to grow the economy, and shifts blame to Congress for any notion that the stimulus wasn’t large enough:
Cubachi has the transcript, emphases mine:
You know, I think one of the things I tried to describe is, we were in unchartered territory. This is not a typical postwar recession. It was caused by a financial crisis in the biggest economy, the center of the world economy, something we haven’t seen since the Great Depression.
And I certainly was very frank that there were things that I got wrong, that none of us really knew or anticipated. You know, what I do feel good about is, one, that we have learned, that we certainly — you know, we gave it our best shot. We very much told the president that this was a serious crisis, we should do all that we could.
And I think we did get as big a Recovery Act as we could have gotten through Congress. But, you know, what we have done ever since then — we didn’t just stop there. It’s been a constant process of thinking about, what more do we do for the financial system? What are the evolving steps? And I think that is really the test of policy…
I think, you know, what — what all of us need to think about is, where are we now? Where do we go from here? And I think, with the unemployment rate where it is, with job growth — again, it is incredibly important that we are now growing again. The change from where we are when we came into office is dramatic.
Let’s dispense with this Congress-made-us-do-it nonsense about the stimulus. I covered this in detail when Joe Biden first attempted this argument in July, so be sure to read that post in full. Suffice it to say that Romer’s proposal for a stimulus requested exactly the money Obama eventually got, and promised that would be enough to keep unemployment under 8% without having millions of people bail out of the workforce. Obama himself pronounced himself pleased with the scope, saying that he got “the right size, the right scope” from Congress.
The truth is that Romer blew it by assuming that the Keynesian principle of getting $1.50 of economic growth for every $1 of government spending actually happened anywhere outside of the halls of Academia. All this administration did was create an illusion of substantial growth for two quarters, and when the money ran out, so did the illusion.
Jake Tapper notes the end of Recovery Summer, and the debate to come after the utter failure of Romer & Co:
Note: I will not be at the State Fair today for the NARN show, but Mitch Berg will be there. Be sure to listen on the stream from AM1280 The Patriot!










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No lady, you gave it OUR best shot. You experimented with OUR money and the money of OUR kids.
These people make me physically ill.
29Victor on September 4, 2010 at 12:53 PM
Weakend at Barry’s
Christien on September 4, 2010 at 12:53 PM
According to Barry, the problem is: They’re just bailing too slow.
kingsjester on September 4, 2010 at 12:58 PM
If she was the best they could get and botched it up so bad what in the world will the person who takes her place do? I guess it never crossed this bho and team’s mind to cut taxes or keep the Bush tax cuts in place? NO, NO, they just keep spending and demanding more spending to ‘get us out of this mess Bush left us’.
L
letget on September 4, 2010 at 1:01 PM
great backhand Ed.
ted c on September 4, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Misfire huh? I thought I saw Romer out at the range the other night.
The War Planner on September 4, 2010 at 1:01 PM
that’s all that its about….feeling and learning—never about evaluating tried and true methods and applying them appropriately, it’s about feeling good about applying your f*cked up ideology and then learning something from it…..Awwwww, that’s nice, you learnt your selves a lesson, Christina, and left broken lives and a broken economy in your wake and now you can go sip latte’s back under the orchard on a leisurely stroll across the quad…
nice.
ted c on September 4, 2010 at 1:04 PM
So they didn’t stop at wasting all that money after they got it some 18 months ago They’ve also upped the ante by spending the next 18 months thinking about what more they could do.
‘Creating and saving jobs with their minds’, as Ace would say.
Romer back to academia teaching economics in 5, 4, 3, ….
Dusty on September 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM
No accountability for financially destroying millions of taxpayers while porking up her party. She can never pay back the consequences of her crime, but some jail time for her and the rest of this regime might send a message to future crooks.
Hening on September 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM
Yeah, borrowing more money and spending it in the wrong places would have been better. Holy Cow! The geniuses in the White House are clueless about fundamental economic principals that everyone else easily understands.
And this dribble about this being an unprecedented recession is really annoying. What’s unprecedented is having the expectation that the Obama stimulus plan would somehow work now when it hasn’t ever worked before.
Well, that’s the frickin’ problem isn’t it?
SlaveDog on September 4, 2010 at 1:06 PM
Sniveling, bitter, elitist, looting, commie freaks. Out!
yubley on September 4, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Ah yes, I can see it now!
OBAMA 2012!
I’LL GIVE IT MY BEST SHOT!
Yep! That should give him that landslide victory!
pilamaye on September 4, 2010 at 1:08 PM
Encourage people to vote for politicians who talk mainly about freedom and not for those who talk about “solutions.” We can’t afford political solutions.
beatcanvas on September 4, 2010 at 1:09 PM
Inspired, Ed. That’s as good as Orrogance.
ladyingray on September 4, 2010 at 1:11 PM
Of course you get $1.50 back for $1.00 in spending. Of course they created or saved all those jobs. It says so in their economic projections spreadsheet.
Maybe you don’t understand how impressive their academic credentials are. If you did, you’d believe the numbers on their spreadsheets rather than what you’re mistakenly observing about the actual economy.
Kohath on September 4, 2010 at 1:18 PM
Academia,
teaching what they have no experience in
Kini on September 4, 2010 at 1:19 PM
Chances she will now be unemployed?
ZERO
Chances she will be soon working for a liberal lobbying firm, media outlet, think tank or in some sort of legal capacity at a HIGH SALARY?
100%
Opposite Day on September 4, 2010 at 1:21 PM
Etch this lil’ missive in stone folks….The next time a statist wants a job, wants to hold an office….show them the results of 2008-2010 and remind them what their “best shot” looks like.
2010: The Year of the Left’s Best Shot
ted c on September 4, 2010 at 1:21 PM
OOPS……………
I forgot the obvious…………
ACADEMIA…………….
Opposite Day on September 4, 2010 at 1:22 PM
If you gave it your best shot and it failed, why continue to reinforce failure?
DAT60A3 on September 4, 2010 at 1:22 PM
She’s teaching some of our children…
d1carter on September 4, 2010 at 1:24 PM
“We’ve drilled all the holes we can in the ship’s hull, but it’s still sinking.”
RBMN on September 4, 2010 at 1:27 PM
That’s what scares me. She will be spreading her economic philosophy like a disease, infecting young minds.
iurockhead on September 4, 2010 at 1:27 PM
She still doesn’t have a clue.
What’s she a doctor in, malpractice?
Kini on September 4, 2010 at 1:29 PM
Like Rush always say; Lieberals never admit to their failings because they meant to do well. It’s their intentions that ought to be judged – not their results!
honsy on September 4, 2010 at 1:30 PM
The economy will grow, once the government gets our of our business.
Obama, hates profit.
Kini on September 4, 2010 at 1:35 PM
Can’t this twerp do math? When politicians spend every last dime of surplus or trust fund accumulation to fund spending, spending, spending then the Keynesian Cushion is GONE!
.
The real lesson is “Give politicians damn little money to spend so they won’t waste it on their reelection campaigns through entitlements structures and spending sprees!”
.
NO representation causing greater taxation!
ExpressoBold on September 4, 2010 at 1:36 PM
Well, then drill holes in the other side to let the water out. Duh.
29Victor on September 4, 2010 at 1:37 PM
Fail
dont taze me bro on September 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM
Seconded. At least David Blaine provides entertainment with his illusions.
Extrafishy on September 4, 2010 at 1:39 PM
Academia would be better off NOT hiring her back and while trimming their budgets letting go of professors who teach the same bunk economic theory.
Why are you allowing failed policies to be taught to our young minds America? Throw it out and never let it in the backdoor again.
journeyintothewhirlwind on September 4, 2010 at 1:41 PM
Meh, she’s just teaching Californians.
They’re idiots anyway.
tetriskid on September 4, 2010 at 1:42 PM
I STILL don’t get that. However would ANYONE think that would work? Even on paper? That’s like getting 150% efficiency out of a machine…it ain’t gonna happen. Who thinks of these things?
Bob's Kid on September 4, 2010 at 1:46 PM
This lying sack of shite knows too well that there was no recovery…but a cover up.
She has been lying since day one. Go back and see the crap she was spewing in February 2009.
This smiling load she be publicly disgraced!
Gob on September 4, 2010 at 1:46 PM
Sumers doesn’t need to be far behind her..:)
Dire Straits on September 4, 2010 at 1:51 PM
Sorry..:)
Dire Straits on September 4, 2010 at 1:52 PM
I don’t think enough attention has been paid to the whole bait and switch that the Left has pulled regarding their Bush hatred.
For 8 years, the Left hated Bush because of a) the Florida recount, b) being in the White House when 9/11 happened, and therefore being able to shape the narrative for what the country’s repsonse should be (“radical Islam is the greatest challenge and the greatest threat of the 21st century”), c) the Iraq war, and d) counter terrorism policies that included the Patriot Act and Gitmo.
Yes, the Left bitched about Bush’s economic policies, but it was always an afterthought. Show me one example of a leftwing journalist writing a detailed account that predicted exactly how Bush’s economic policies would lead to the financial meltdown of 9/08? If they were out there, they’d be the greatest media darling to come along since Obama himself. They’d be considered the liberal Nostradamus who foresaw Bush’s economic armageddon. But no such person exists. Instead, we got the MSM, acting as Obama’s offensive line, mumbling collectively about “deregulation”, performing a right side sweep so that Obama could carry the ball a few yards to the goal line, with the 9/08 economic collapse acting as a fumble that was recoverd on the Republican’s 2 yard line with less than a minute to play in the 4th quarter.
The Left hated Bush right from the get go, and as soon as the fall of Lehman Bros. and AIG occured, they took their 8 year long hatred of him over the 2000 election and his aggressive response to 9/11 and tried to convince others, as well as themselves, that they were always as angry about Bush screwing up the economy the way he screwed up the response to 9/11.
It is the biggest hate filled political propaganda bait and switch in the history of American politics. When liberals say “a vote for the Republicans is a vote for the policies that got us into this mess”, they are winking furiously to each other.
ardenenoch on September 4, 2010 at 1:53 PM
We gave it our best shot… and Vladimir Lenin is quite proud…
phreshone on September 4, 2010 at 1:54 PM
LIAR
BetseyRoss on September 4, 2010 at 1:55 PM
Hey, we gave it our best shot
Custer’s last words at the Little Big Horn?
MaiDee on September 4, 2010 at 1:57 PM
I’m so hungry right now that I really couldn’t pay too much attention to what this dude was saying.
Red Cloud on September 4, 2010 at 1:58 PM
Romer didn’t give it her best shot in any way shape or form.
Her best shot would have been to take an anti-Keynesian aapproach, true to how she got her academic reputation, for showing the failure of FDR’s policies during the Depression.
Instead she threw all that aside and lead, spun, lied about a mission she honestly should have known was doomed.
There was a blog article a few weeks back as to how she can get her soul back, after seliing out to Junior. Interesting question.
Harry Schell on September 4, 2010 at 2:00 PM
well there is one place that has a chance of working, but a leftist/liberal mindset will never allow the spending to be allocated there… fully developed military hardware…
If the stimulus had gone to buy F-16′s, C-17′s, C-130′s, the marginal profits would be high enough, (and the asset life-span long enough) that the secondary investment of those profits by the private sector could generate a multiplier effect… Hiring government workers will never work
phreshone on September 4, 2010 at 2:07 PM
Yeah, that’s what I always tell people after I flush a trillion of their dollars down the toilet.
forest on September 4, 2010 at 2:08 PM
I keep reading journalist left and right complaining the GOP will screw up when they are in control again. The republicans couldn’t do any worse than this regime if they go through any phone book and ask for suggestions on what to do to improve the economy.
dragondrop on September 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM
I understand that the president has promised to introduce a new bundle of programs on Wednesday. What could they be thinking if they already gave it their best shot?
DrStock on September 4, 2010 at 2:15 PM
That’s Pat! Err, Chris…
Maquis on September 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM
Her best shot would have been to take an anti-Keynesian aapproach, true to how she got her academic reputation, for showing the failure of FDR’s policies during the Depression.
Instead she threw all that aside and lead, spun, lied about a mission she honestly should have known was doomed.
Harry Schell on September 4, 2010 at 2:00 PM
That is what is bad. She knew/knows what works and yet jumped in w/the rest of the ebola virus crowd in DC.
arnold ziffel on September 4, 2010 at 2:26 PM
Aw, she meant well, so I forgive her! After all, with the new Obamacare, there’s no danger of me outliving my now decimated savings.
“Keep learning,” you guys, as you spend our trillions!
PattyJ on September 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM
“we gave it our best shot”?????
Listen b*****, you’re wasting my ***** money and the money of my children, so kindly KMA.
PackerBronco on September 4, 2010 at 2:32 PM
Most of us had a father to tell us “You know, son, sometimes tryin’ ain’t good enough.” Øbama had Frank Marshall there to tell him “It’s all Whitey’s fault.”
Kafir on September 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM
She can pat herself on the back that they gave it a good shot? That they will ‘learn’ from this lesson? And she will still have a cushy ‘job’ in her ivory tower.
What about real world consequences? Anyone? Bueller?
Sir Napsalot on September 4, 2010 at 2:36 PM
In our winless lossless society she gets a trophy for trying. Hey, they’ve only wasted a few trillion dollars.
Mojave Mark on September 4, 2010 at 2:45 PM
D__n! Has the woman ever made a simple, declarative sentence in her life? Is there nothing that she actually knows?
I cannot feed my children on opinions.
ss396 on September 4, 2010 at 2:52 PM
Dusty (September 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM)
And that’s adding insult to injury, isn’t it? Imagine grinding the American economic engine into dust and then returning to instruct others how to do the same. It’s simply insane. Plus, her “learning experience” only cost trillions of taxpayer dollars and a stagnant, angry nation.
We really don’t need to see all their grades any more because we know Obama and Romer et al went to the same school.
AnonymousDrivel on September 4, 2010 at 2:55 PM
in other news, my doughnut diet failed to make me lose weight because I failed to eat enough doughnuts.
joeindc44 on September 4, 2010 at 2:57 PM
If she admits this was the best possible that they could have done then doesn’t that prove that the whole idea of a centrally managed and stimulated economy is a philosophical failure in total. What would an incompetent implementation of a centrally managed economic stimulus possibly have looked like!?
Resolute on September 4, 2010 at 3:05 PM
Keynes, actually. What these folks, and their fellow travelers like Krugman, conveniently overlook and never mention is that the economy for which Keynes was prescribing is NOT the economy that we have today. In the short-term, some targeted stimulus spending could bridge an economic dip. And borrowing money is not in and of itself a bad thing. But Keynes’ advocacy also included the capability – indeed, the requirement! – to control and to pay for this borrowing and spending.
What we have today is long-term, systemic deficit spending with no end in sight. A Keynesian response is simply not appropriate to the current economy.
ss396 on September 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM
Of course they are out of ideas. The only ones they have are socialist ideas. And when those don’t work, OBVIOUSLY IT’S BECAUSE THE PEOPLE ARE AT FAULT.
GarandFan on September 4, 2010 at 3:16 PM
A perfect example of what I like to say – Keep your mouth shut and people will like you better.
TinMan13 on September 4, 2010 at 3:21 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NalNAUAQVsk
best shots.
ted c on September 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Px0wErIeJI&NR=1
more best shots.
ted c on September 4, 2010 at 3:27 PM
Now there is a multi $Trillion understatement…….
Oopsdaisy on September 4, 2010 at 3:36 PM
“The crucial private sector…” Oh, so now those of us out here in the real world are now crucial… how nice.
leftnomore on September 4, 2010 at 3:37 PM
actually Romer is one of the more sane people in this admin.
she’s known for her work on the multiplier effect on tax reduction (greater than 1). the majority of literature says the effect is at most 1 on spending. she knows that.
for
she is now famous…but she was the sock puppet for the left (Obama, campaign for America’s future…seiu, uaw, etc.)
r keller on September 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM
Summer recovery – imagine the Fall
Schadenfreude on September 4, 2010 at 4:04 PM
Democrats should be forced to refund this $800 billion stimulus. Like a recall.
faraway on September 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM
r keller on September 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM
You’re absolutely correct. That is why all the crap she has been projectile vomiting since February 2009 makes me CrAzY-go-nuts! She knows better and smiles and lies just like Obama’s Human Gefilte Fish, Baghdad Bob Fibbs!
Joe that donut analogy was good!
Gob on September 4, 2010 at 4:42 PM
I don’t know how many of us went to college during the 70′s when teaching Keynesian’s theory was all the rage in the econ classes. I sat in a macro class where a blowhard liberal prof was telling us that we could not have inflation and recession at the same time, and not have high unemployment at the same time either.
I had to raise my hand in class and ask, “why do we have 13% inflation, 13+% unemployment, and housing interest rates over 15% right now? Oh and by the way, my dad is unemployed, too.” Needless to say, I didn’t believe keynes theory then and never have since.
Why did the idiots in Congress believe this was going to work? I don’t think they did. I think they just wanted to spend on all of their pet projects that had been on the back burner while they were out of power 12 years. I think I heard on Beck’s show that the Apollo something or other, had this stimulous bill all written out even from before Obamaa’s election. This was never publicized in the in so called main stream media.
karenhasfreedom on September 4, 2010 at 5:13 PM
@ 6:30 she says something about ending up in the sweet spot… Un-freakin-believable… Trillions wasted and handed out to do-nothing special interests… with no end to the bad news in sight… and she calls it the sweet spot.
-
Obama must be talkin golf at the economy briefs… ‘I hit it in the sweet spot and it still ends up in the weeds… Go figure’.
RalphyBoy on September 4, 2010 at 5:20 PM
How did that photo of Janet Reno get into the headline?
bloviator on September 4, 2010 at 5:21 PM
Destroyed the greatest country in the world and it’s back to lala land teaching sponge brains the same thing that’s failed every time it’s tried.
Kissmygrits on September 4, 2010 at 5:34 PM
“Hey, why do you think I am getting all A’s and B’s in law school?”
/crr6
Del Dolemonte on September 4, 2010 at 6:16 PM
Didn’t I read that she and her husband wrote a paper a few years back that said you get more economic impact for $1 of tax cuts then you do for $1 of government spending?
Anyway, her efforts were in vain from the beginning. When you have a President who’s core philosophy is that of scarcity of resources (money, manpower, etc.) thus the need for greater management and control you inevitably end up with less of everything. Thus reaffirming their own belief of the scarcity of resources.
Cause and effect.
LifeTrek on September 4, 2010 at 7:25 PM
I can see Democrat stupidity from my house. In fact, I have seen it since the Dems took control of Congress in 2006. Their history of economic malfeasance goes back to FDR, and they haven’t learned any lessons yet.
First, Orzag bites the dust, not Romer. Get rid of Geithner and Benrnanke and the rest of those Madoff wannabes.
onlineanalyst on September 4, 2010 at 7:49 PM
An excellent summary and well said.
Add to your points that Bush wanted to address the soon-to-come disaster of SS and offered suggestions that were ridiculed and shot down deceitfully. He also tried to clean up the Fannie/Freddie mess, but the demagoguing by Barney Frank and Maxine Waters destroyed those efforts and led to the meltdown.
onlineanalyst on September 4, 2010 at 8:11 PM
This is why Academia shouldn’t be allowed to play in the big kids toy box.
DSchoen on September 4, 2010 at 11:58 PM
No Romer you moron.
The only shot you took, and or received was the one in your foot. Wow, and to think this stuffed so and so will be returning to U. Cal Berkley to teach economics. What’s the course title going to be Christina, We gave a 800bil Keynesian economics one more shot, but FAILED, just like FDR did in the 30s…ha, ha, ha….
byteshredder on September 5, 2010 at 2:05 AM
Feel good and best shot is the story of Democrats, Republicans and every sorry ass liberal retard out there. If your best shot misses the other guy kills you, dumb ass!
jarhead0311 on September 5, 2010 at 5:34 AM
So True… Ain’t it amazing how leftists over the years run the same stupid, destructive experiment with other peoples’ lives, freedoms, and savings over and over again expecting different results. Isn’t that the definition of INSANITY?!
HomeoftheBrave on September 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM
And she is goung back to TEACING ECONOMY?????
gullxn on September 5, 2010 at 11:23 AM
“We gave it our best shot!” underscores the underperforming liberal philosophy that trying is as good as doing. Second place is just first loser you worthless commie.
Alden Pyle on September 6, 2010 at 10:05 PM