California snubs “Columbia” free trade
posted at 5:20 pm on September 4, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
With unemployment over 12% and a budget deficit the size of its Central Valley, one might think that California would welcome new opportunities to open markets for its products. Instead, the legislature passed a resolution condemning a proposed free-trade agreement with Colombia, even though the agreement would actually create reciprocity for American products in regards to the already-established open trade for Colombian exports. As Investors Business Daily reports, the move demonstrates the grip of organized labor on California’s governing class:
After its legislature passed a resolution condemning free trade with Colombia, you have to wonder: Is California being led by rank simpletons or actual enemies of the state?
In an official document that in one place misspelled “Colombia,” California’s assembly voted 43-27 last week to urge the U.S. Congress to approve Joint Resolution 27, stating: “The Legislature of the State of California strongly urges the United States Congress to oppose a free trade agreement between the United States and Colombia.”
Given California’s high unemployment (12.3% in July, third highest in the nation) and lowly financial condition (the government is virtually bankrupt), the act borders on dereliction of duty. At the very least it reeks of special-interest politics, the work of a little cartel looking out for itself and no one else.
The subject heading for the initial hearing of the resolution reads “Columbia-U.S. free trade agreement,” although Colombia is spelled correctly throughout the rest of the document. It’s also in the final version, emphasis mine:
WHEREAS, The Office of the Attorney General of Columbia does not attempt to investigate all outstanding unsolved murder cases, but rather only the subset of cases that have been previously presented to the International Labor Organization and new murder cases from 2006 onward; and …
It’s an easy mistake to make — I have made it myself in the past — but for an official communication, it should embarrass the legislature that intended to use this to scold Colombia. More importantly, it should anger the people of California, who could create jobs through exports to Colombia in agriculture and high-tech manufacturing. Political hacks in Sacramento may be more worried about pleasing their union cronies than working to repair California’s economy, but the voters will have different priorities in this election year.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
CA is being run by democrats, so the answer is both simpleton and enemies of the state.
Inanemergencydial on September 4, 2010 at 5:23 PM
So ‘Columbia’ is unacceptable due to human rights violations, but China is just fine?
sharrukin on September 4, 2010 at 5:24 PM
The Office of the Attorney General of Columbia
Is that Colombia, or Columbia? Now, I can agree that Columbia U, and District of Columbia should be boycotted.
keep the change on September 4, 2010 at 5:25 PM
We must destroy the unions… before they destroy us.
Chavez has successfully destroyed his country with socialism and forcing people into unions. They will and ARE doing the same here.
Skywise on September 4, 2010 at 5:30 PM
“Columbia.”
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
rogerb on September 4, 2010 at 5:31 PM
They would do business with Cuba or Venezuela in a heart beat though.
NeoKong on September 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM
What do you expect? The lefties that control our legislature probably still believe the Marxist propaganda about
ColumbiaColombia. That, and their union paymasters hate free trade on principle. In the end, however, it’s a meaningless gesture: how much influence do state legislative resolutions have on Congress these days?irishspy on September 4, 2010 at 5:33 PM
Why not ask the current Democratic candidate for governor, Moonbeam Brown. Most of California’s current problems started with his administration back in the 70′s.
GarandFan on September 4, 2010 at 5:34 PM
I have two words that explain all the butthurt over trade with Colombia:
Hugo
Chavez
How anybody still idolizes that moronic Castro puppet is beyond me.
Sekhmet on September 4, 2010 at 5:36 PM
Economic policy decisions made for political reasons. Everything is political.
Skandia Recluse on September 4, 2010 at 5:39 PM
Actually, if their are jobs in Colombia, maybe there will be less illegal immigrants in California.
Also, Colombia has fought the drug cartels and the commies and suffered greatly. They deserve any help we can give them, including a free trade agreement.
California has effectively killed the goose that laid the golden egg. Their greed has killed business and is killing the taxpayer while they still act like wh*res with our money.
Blake on September 4, 2010 at 5:44 PM
Hypocrites
orfannkyl on September 4, 2010 at 5:46 PM
They’re buying indulgences in the Church of Modern Liberalism. Remember: absolute moral authority. Gotta keep it pure. Gotta keep it real.
Give that ol’ time religion…
karl9000 on September 4, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Garbage in, garbage out. No surprise.
Red Cloud on September 4, 2010 at 5:54 PM
This was asked and answered long ago, I’d have thought. Not just the leadership, but the majority of the electorate as well. Or they’d not be in the mess they’re in.
quikstrike98 on September 4, 2010 at 6:06 PM
One more reason it is so important for Californians to vote incumbents out of office in the State Senate and Assembly races!
And please vote for Meg Whitman for Governor rather than former failed Governor Jerry Brown!
wren on September 4, 2010 at 6:13 PM
What this is about is unions. Labor groups in Colombia have been trying to get a foot hold but the government and businesses resist them. They know that it’s the start of socialism. Colombian Labor unions have sent many organizers to the United States labor groups like the SEIU, AFL CIO, IBEW asking for help in trying to get unions going in Colombia. This has been to no avail because Colombians know what unions are and don’t want them. This is why the Union Controlled Democrats are so antagonistic to Colombia even to the point of trying ot help FARC ovrthrow the government. A Free Trade Agreement helps us not Colombia as they already have what they need…
CCRWM on September 4, 2010 at 6:27 PM
Correctamundo. There’s a fight on for the soul of unionism in the US, and one faction of it is the international-socialist/loony-leftist monolith that has reguarly assaulted organized American labor since the 1910s and regularly been repulsed.
The internationalist faction can basically be predicted by looking up whoever Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn are “fer” and “agin.” Colombia is in the “agin” column for them. Hugo Chavez, they’re “fer.”
This is very, very “I-80 mafia” as an aspect of California politics. It’s entrenched in the axis running along I-80 between the Bay area, Sacramento, and Tahoe. Labor, especially in private industry, is a lot more parochial — “normal American” — and skeptical of the internationalist agenda in the other parts of California.
This all bears watching, and it’s not just in California.
J.E. Dyer on September 4, 2010 at 6:42 PM
May the union members in the U.S. wake up, or be destroyed by their masters.
Schadenfreude on September 4, 2010 at 6:48 PM
Yes. That is because the new Left neomarxists resent the facts that the Colombian government has resisted (with force and US assistance) for decades the efforts the FARC and other communist groups to overthrow the government create a communist narco-state. I’ve dealt with many of these leftists; they use any pretext to spite Colombia’s government.
Firefly_76 on September 4, 2010 at 6:58 PM
More evidence that leftists treat legislation and foreign policy efforts like the first draft of a term paper. It’s the rest of us that are the editors and in the end, as Christie “we gave it our best shot” romer puts it, we learn something and feel good about what we did.
Academics and intellectuals. Useless for everything except sucking off the teat of a University’s budget.
ted c on September 4, 2010 at 7:11 PM
Once again, California embarrasses the country.
JEM on September 4, 2010 at 7:26 PM
Pelosi fought Bush tooth and nail over that free trade agreement with Colombia. The Dems in CA are so sympathetic to Marxist regimes (as pointed above), but they adamantly support corrosive unions. When will the citizens of that state oust their representation? It doesn’t act in their interests.
onlineanalyst on September 4, 2010 at 7:27 PM
Colombia should announce that Avianca, ACES and other airlines will no longer buy Boeing aircraft, until California unions renounce the boycott against Colombia products. Let’s see which unions have more power.
kenprice on September 4, 2010 at 7:28 PM
I swear by Barack Hussein Obama this sacred oath that I shall render unconditional obedience to Barack Hussein Obama, the Supreme Ruler of the ACORN Reich, supreme commander of the armed forces, Divine Ruler of all that he surveys and that I shall at all times be ready, as a subservient sheeple soldier, to sell my honor and soul to keep him from any possible embarrassment.” (Emanuel Rahm Form 666)
Tav on September 4, 2010 at 7:33 PM
Drugs’ll do that to ya…
RalphyBoy on September 4, 2010 at 7:53 PM
The Colombian rebels, the FARC, are murderous communists who act as a mercenary army for the drug lords. Of course labor unions support them over the government.
theCork on September 4, 2010 at 7:54 PM
So is Eric Holder going to sue California for passing a law that clearly interferes with something that falls under the federal government’s jurisdiction?
Gwillie on September 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM
I’ll withold my judgement about California until after the November election. If they elect the same group of morons they have in the past, they deserve everything they get.
bflat879 on September 4, 2010 at 8:27 PM
This is what really needs to change. It doesn’t matter WHO you have as Governor of this state. As long as our state legislative branch is still full of libtards, nothing will change.
FontanaConservative on September 4, 2010 at 8:31 PM
Columbia is where Obama spent some of his mystery years.
Tzetzes on September 4, 2010 at 8:49 PM
What’s the uproar about?
“Columbia” means “America.” So California is just boycotting the rest of us. Typical.
BierManVA on September 4, 2010 at 8:49 PM
CA needs to become an island.
ultracon on September 4, 2010 at 9:01 PM
Just one more nail of California’s coffin…but the Dems in congress have done the same thing. Typical.
AUINSC on September 4, 2010 at 9:30 PM
so, when you write “although Columbia is spelled correctly throughout the rest of the document” do you mean Columbia or Colombia?
rarbolay on September 4, 2010 at 9:52 PM
I think the big problem is the statutory requirement to have an IQ of no higher than 85 to get into the CA legislature.
WarEagle01 on September 4, 2010 at 10:11 PM
Holding breath now… /s
barnone on September 4, 2010 at 10:51 PM
Welcome to my Hell… I am unemployed AND live under these charlatans.
leftnomore on September 5, 2010 at 12:46 AM
Too bad the morons in the California legislature can’t read Newsweek.
clghitis on September 5, 2010 at 1:28 AM
California – just not broke enough…
Canadian Infidel on September 5, 2010 at 2:12 AM
We know Pelosi has unseemly connections to Veneuela and FARC, indirectly – how many California “local” politicians do?
There is a form of government known as a “kakistocracy,” government by the least-qualified or most unprincipled citizens. How did we end up there?
It would be nice to see how many of the people who voted for this have connections to Venezuela or FARC via donations or travel. There are a chunk of “old-school lefty” state legislators from the bay area who would be likely to side with marxist thugs over anyone else.
Merovign on September 5, 2010 at 8:12 AM
John F. Kerry [D-MA]
pain train on September 5, 2010 at 8:56 AM
Any mention of the California Central Valley, as in the first sentenceof above, should include “congress-caused dust bowl” as an adjective. The devastation of the once beautifully abundant farmland because of supposed environmental concern for the delta smelt does not get the ongoing publicity that it should. Farms destroyed, thousands added to unemployment rolls, and much less food being grown. This is not even get mentioned in this week’s stories about world-wide food shortages. Maybe it has become part of the new normal?
GaltBlvnAtty on September 5, 2010 at 11:36 AM
Oh, yeah. I forgot about that fkn parasite fish that lives in canals that we are destroying farms and jobs for.
Blake on September 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM
Ideology based stupidity. The people and ideology behind this are definitely no friend of the people that are out of work….
DL13 on September 5, 2010 at 1:03 PM
This is why I would not mind Jerry Brown being governor. The political culture in California is such that only the total collapse of the state is going to change it. Only that is going to shock people into realizing the failure of their voting. Meg Whitman is going to be a lame duck governor. She is a vanity candidate that is paying to be the CEO of California because she thinks she can handle it. She wil do more harm to the GOP in California than good. Plus she gives the electorate a relief valve. When she wins it takes the pressure off of Democrat voters to change the way they vote. They will continue to vote for recalcitrant obstinate liberlas for as long as they can. With Whitman as a scape goat they can keep sending liberals to Sacramento.
Theworldisnotenough on September 5, 2010 at 3:21 PM