Unemployment rises to 9.6%, 54,000 jobs lost
posted at 8:43 am on September 3, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
The unemployment rate went up slightly in August to 9.6%, over the July rate of 9.5%, and overall the economy shed 54,000 jobs, according to the latest report from the BLS. Private sector growth slowed from in July, dropping from an adjusted gain of 107,000 to 67,000, while the government terminated 131,000 jobs:
Nonfarm payroll employment changed little (-54,000) in August, and the unemployment rate was about unchanged at 9.6 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Government employment fell, as 114,000 temporary workers hired for the decennial census completed their work. Private-sector payroll employment continued to trend up modestly (+67,000).
The news didn’t get any better on the long-term front, either — and has remained little changed between Recovery Summer and last summer’s meltdown:
The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) declined by 323,000 over the month to 6.2 million. In August, 42.0 percent ofunemployed persons had been jobless for 27 weeks or more. (See table A-12.)
In August, the civilian labor force participation rate (64.7 percent) and the employment-population ratio (58.5 percent) were essentially unchanged.
(See table A-1.)The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) increased by 331,000 over the month to 8.9 million. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job. (See table A-8.)
About 2.4 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force in August, little changed from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally ad-
justed.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. (See table A-16.)Among the marginally attached, there were 1.1 million discouraged workers in August, an increase of 352,000 from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.3 million persons marginally attached to the labor force had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities.
Bottom line, the economy still has not started to create jobs, and we are continuing to fall further and further behind. The baseline population growth requires a positive job-growth level of 100,000 or more just to break even, so 67,000 additional jobs means we lost ground by at least 33,000 jobs. The slowdown in private-sector job growth even from the below-water level we have mainly seen in the last two years indicates that we’re in for a long, dry spell.
However, Reuters unexpectedly finds this to be good news:
U.S. employment fell for a third straight month in August, but the decline was far less than expected and private payrolls growth surprised on the upside, easing pressure on the Federal Reserve to prop up growth.
Nonfarm payrolls fell 54,000, the Labor Department said on Friday as temporary jobs to conduct the decennial dropped by 114,000.
Private employment, considered a better gauge of labor market health, increased 67,000 after a revised 107,000 gain in July. In addition, the government revised payrolls for June and July to show 123,000 fewer jobs lost than previously reported.
So we created 40,000 fewer private sector jobs and the unemployment rate went up, and that’s a surprise on the upside? That’s mighty fine spin by Reuters … and completely expected.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
How did this plan not work? More bikes lanes is usually a key economic indicator.
mankai on September 3, 2010 at 9:53 AM
Out: “The oceans will rise…”
In: “The joblessness will rise…”
faraway on September 3, 2010 at 10:01 AM
It will be closer to 10% than 9%…
Keep spinning, Dems… We’re NOT buying it…
Khun Joe on September 3, 2010 at 10:04 AM
They’re grabbin’ at straws.
CynicalOptimist on September 3, 2010 at 10:06 AM
But the stock market seems to be taking the Reuters “blue skies forever!” tack on this one, at least early on.
Reminds me of the best adage about equities:
“The market can stay irrational a lot longer than you can stay solvent.
DRPrice on September 3, 2010 at 10:07 AM
It will be closer to 10% than 9%…
Keep spinning, Dems… We’re NOT buying it…
Khun Joe on September 3, 2010 at 10:04 AM
I agree It should be going up. The problem is the numbers somehow get tweaked. We shall see.
sandee on September 3, 2010 at 10:08 AM
When one person loses his job, things will start getting better.
Hint: you can’t say his middle name.
profitsbeard on September 3, 2010 at 10:09 AM
In the words of team Obama-
All economists agree
The Summer of Recovery
is going to be followed up by
wait for it -
The Utterly Awesome Autumn.
gonnjos on September 3, 2010 at 10:11 AM
Can I just say “duh”.
I’m loving the talking points. On every flipping news station is the same junk spewing out of different Dem’s mouths. “We were told that the economy would turn around by now.” or last month or last year or whatever.
I guess the economy is just not doing what it was told. How dare it?
ORconservative on September 3, 2010 at 10:14 AM
Yeah, but think about all of those “SAVED” jobs. Things would be so much worse if Obama hadn’t “SAVED” all of those jobs for us. Why I heard that our $1 TRILLION stimulus package “SAVED” about a million jobs. That puts the cost at about $1 million per job “SAVED” and worth every penny.
MJBrutus on September 3, 2010 at 10:14 AM
Meanwhile, Obama is muttering, “But it’s not 15, 16 or 18%! It’s all because America can’t make Toyota Corollas.”
albill on September 3, 2010 at 10:16 AM
In reality, the Wreckovery Summer,
is transitioning into -
The Fabulous Economic Fall?
gonnjos on September 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM
Dumb question: Obama whines about the near trillion wasted on the war in Iraq.
I imagine lots of guns, bullets, planes, ships, etc. had to be manufactured. How much of that trillion spent in the war effort created (or saved) how many jobs in the U.S.?
albill on September 3, 2010 at 10:18 AM
albill on September 3, 2010 at 10:16 AM
He’s right there, real unemployment including those no longer looking is 20 or 21%1
Worse than the Jimmy Cater Misery index years I bet!
dhunter on September 3, 2010 at 10:19 AM
We’re not there yet, I don’t think, but we’re on our way. At least for now we don’t have inflation. Of course Helicopter Ben is doing everything he can to bring it about.
MJBrutus on September 3, 2010 at 10:21 AM
Obama
“I have a dream (and that’s all I have)”
MaiDee on September 3, 2010 at 10:22 AM
“I have a
dreamSCEME (and that’s all I have)”MaiDee on September 3, 2010 at 10:22 AM
Fixed dat!
dhunter on September 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM
Count it!
lorien1973 on September 3, 2010 at 10:36 AM
When does it become clear to people that reuter-roto and AssHo-she-ate-it Depressed are nothing more then a collection of hack opinion columnists rather then news oraganizations.
PatriotPete on September 3, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Not so if you listen to democratic strategist.
Just heard a democratic strategist and Bill Clinton advisor state on FOX News that this jobs report had a lot of good news in it and the administration should feel better that things are not getting worse but just a little bit better.
It must be a whole lot of fun being a liberal….never,ever having to face reality or ever really accomplishing anything productive.
Being an Obama supporter means life is rainbows,unicorns,and butterfly farts 24/7.
Baxter Greene on September 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM
From 1984:
mankai on September 3, 2010 at 10:48 AM
At least with that Trillion…25 million people were freed from one of the deadliest,terrorist supporting,genocidal dictators of our time.We took out a major threat and gained an ally (if we continue to support them and help with security).
What did we get with Obama’s Trillion spent.
Higher unemployment….lower wages….massive debt….higher deficits…
History will not be on the democrats side concerning this line of talking points.
Baxter Greene on September 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM
There are dam# lies….. and there are statistics.
Keep the population confused with cooked numbers served up with a side of propaganda.
I thought this line by Romer sums up the Obama administration well:
In other words…lets not make economically sound decisions….lets do what scores us the most political points.
Yes We Can!!!!!
Baxter Greene on September 3, 2010 at 10:59 AM
The Fickle Finger of Fate seems to be pointing toward a Fabulous Fall of Failure.
Lily on September 3, 2010 at 11:06 AM
Take it from someone that works in the industry, death stalls are frequently followed by a five spiral crash.
My collie says:
CyberCipher on September 3, 2010 at 11:14 AM
This would be fine but for those damn racist facts and numbers.
Alden Pyle on September 3, 2010 at 11:20 AM
Unemployed 9.6% acknowledged by the Obama Feds.
GHWB wasted it way too soon on the wrong target.
Voodoo Economics.
maverick muse on September 3, 2010 at 11:28 AM
Camp David. He is going to Camp David after this little speech per Drudge.
Wonder how Geitner feels now to be pulled back from his vacation to huddle with the President and then the President up and goes on another vacation!
journeyintothewhirlwind on September 3, 2010 at 11:31 AM
With apologies to Orwell… just replace “boots” with “jobs” and “barefoot” with “unemployed or underemployed.”
mankai on September 3, 2010 at 11:36 AM
That’s why there’s a huge incentive to lie in the next set of economic reports. When the ‘correction’ comes, the election will be over. Sadly, there’s not much we can do to prevent it. Bammie gets to run the numbers.
slickwillie2001 on September 3, 2010 at 11:36 AM
That’s just the ‘feel good’ number. REAL unemployment (U-6) is 16.7% for August. I can understand their logic in that the U-3 number will go up because more discouraged workers are looking for work, but the U-6 went up by 2 points. If discouraged workers are really the cause for the bump, then there should have been no gain in the U-6.
Wolftech on September 3, 2010 at 11:51 AM
Why do they even need to lie about the numbers?
Everyone expected it to be 9.7% unemployment based upon the estimates Obama gave.
Now the numbers come out as 9.6% and Obama and the news press are spinning this as proof there’s no contraction in the economy and things are looking up because things aren’t as bad as they estimated…
Even though unemployment was 9.5% last month!
And the stupid stock market rallies… (probably aided by Soros…)
It’s all propaganda.
Skywise on September 3, 2010 at 12:07 PM
You know what they say “If you can’t dazzle them with wisdom,Baffle them with bullshit”
BruceB on September 3, 2010 at 12:40 PM
Still trying to figure how the market rallied after an Obama speech. That never happens.
Well, as I said before start building factories over here one at a time away from China. Get ‘made in the USA’ back on some labels. Everyone is buying plastic bins and cheap woven synthetic clothing, eating Chinese food, having their nails done, and buying partical board furniture. America is China’d OUT!
johnnyU on September 3, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Obama’s got his job.
That’s all he cares about.
Off to Camp David.
To putter around for the LABOR DAY Holdiay Weekend.
profitsbeard on September 3, 2010 at 12:49 PM
I’ll tell you something else to spark the economy. I;ve watched it happen. Loss of tax deductable personal interest started an immediate downturn. Rush says it was a good thing to wipe that deduction out, but everyone went to putting it under their mortgage to keep it deductable. Say what you want but breaking that problem back out away from the homes interest is the way to go. People can default on a credit card. Defaulting on a home is bad as we can see. Everyone is doing equity loans, so whats the difference? Give us back personal deductions. Put some integrity back into our homes value. Part of my home loan as an example, is bundled with my car purchase, my credit card balances and so on. How many of you can say the same thing? Case and point.
johnnyU on September 3, 2010 at 12:50 PM
Interesting that
Obama’s Propaganda MinistryMSNBC touts the complete opposite. But then again the MSNBC also believes in the “recovery summer” and unicorns…Liberty or Death on September 3, 2010 at 1:23 PM
Stimulus was good for a lot of people, but not for me.
PrezHussein on September 3, 2010 at 2:21 PM
He’s still out there talking about how many jobs were lost the week he took office, or I gonna keep blaming Bush! Yeah! That’s the ticket.
Um, no, that ship sailed LAST AUGUST, Odumber.
dogsoldier on September 3, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Obama came out today and said the unemployment news was good. Many of the media reports seem to agree.
Maybe next month we’ll get REALLY good news and get back up to 10%! I know we’ve got a long way to go, but I’m confident this administration can do it.
hawksruleva on September 3, 2010 at 3:09 PM
The internals had some less-awful news for some sectors of the economy. But mostly, the stock market is convinced that the continued bad economic news will lead to tax cuts. But that’s probably false hope.
hawksruleva on September 3, 2010 at 3:12 PM
Woohoo, recovery summer, heading the economy in the right direction, moving forward under brilliant leadership.
Wait, I didn’t read the article, but it’s good news that makes Obama look great, right? We got 250,000-500,000 jobs per month this summer, recovery summer is swinging into action and we’re pounding ahead, right?
How can this be? It may be time for a “tempter tantrum”.
gekkobear on September 3, 2010 at 4:44 PM
The stock market has had very, very low volume for months. This means it is being played by a small group of people, with a lot of people sitting on the sidelines. Which candidate did the Upper West Side residing employees of brokerage houses give the most money to in 2008? When you look at Goldmann Sachs, Merrill Lynch, etc, where did their money go? Obama.
So we have a relatively small group of stock market players that desperately want their money and voting “proven right” and throw in George Soros and other wealthy liberals and boom, the market becomes a little game. There is just enough outside influence from people that see where we are going to cause the drop of the last 4 months overall, but they fight this “let’s be positive about Obama” crowd all the time.
The headwinds, the P/E ratios, the amount of tax related transactions being moved into 2010 ahead of the tax cuts expiring, the Obamacare impact on open enrollment the next two months, etc are all visible to lots of people, who aren’t in the market playing around.
The market should be around 8,000, but the O’s supporters in New York are working their tails off to keep it up through November 2. Can you imagine an October surprise (in our favor) of a market at 6,000? Not that I want people to lose their retirement and money, but the longer we postpone the pain, the more pain will be felt in the end.
PastorJon on September 3, 2010 at 4:53 PM
It sure WAS a hard pivit, wasn’t it Barry?
golfmann on September 3, 2010 at 6:32 PM
I decided to do a little digging, and what I came up with sums up the Obama Jobs Recovery.
Jan 2009 Civilian noninstitutional population 234,739,000
Aug 2010 Civilian noninstitutional population 238,099,000
Jan 2009 Civilian Labor Force 154,140,000
Aug 2010 Civilian Labor Force 154,110,000
Jan 2009 Employment Level 142,221,000
Aug 2010 Employment Level 139,250,000
We have 3,360,000 more in the noninstitutional population, and none of them are in the work force, we actually lost 30,000 from the Jan 2009 work force. The work force should be at 156,000,000. There are almost 3,000,000 less working today than when Obama took office. In reality, he lost 4,200,000 because of the missing work force with the larger population.
The unemployment rate should be 10.8%.
How do I get that?
156,110,000 should be in the work force. 16,680,000 are unemployed. Obama says 14,680,000, but he if we are missing 2m from the work force, then they all must be unemployed also, so add them to that column.
The clown has lost 1.2m jobs, but he hides that in the numbers, not that America would care to go find the truth themselves.
WoosterOh on September 3, 2010 at 6:48 PM
Okay, someone set me straight. CBS radio news on the hour several times today as I was driving about claimed that unemployment dropped this month for the first time. Who the snickies is telling the truth?
I’m freaking serious. Is CBS just out and out lying now?
hawkdriver on September 3, 2010 at 8:46 PM
Oh, I see the problem…. They left out unexpectedly. HA
ricor on September 3, 2010 at 9:22 PM
Bring back the red head.
Dhuka on September 3, 2010 at 10:59 PM
Ronald Reagan on the horrible economy (c. 1979-1980)
Just once I’d like to hear SOME politician say that with President Obama’s name in it!
SgtSVJones on September 4, 2010 at 12:21 AM
Lets C… 50,000 troops in Iraq +, 0 the war is over… and now -56,000 is a positive number…. welcome to the new math… kids… Math Barry style
roflmao
donabernathy on September 4, 2010 at 3:00 AM
According to my buddy/expert Ed is using all the right stats.
There are other slices of numbers which could support what you might have heard on CBS. But, as you know, consider the source.
I have been after several people to organize a march of the unemployed on Washington. I think that our community organizer needs a wake up call. He can’t just keep handing out patronage to hack Democrats and minorities and expect the economy to recover. See, some folks want a real job — as alien a concept as that may be to someone from Chicago.
This has gone on for sometime and I expected somebody like Rush to actually have a march of people who want to make money and not just spend gov’t handouts.
However, eventually, the economy will recover on its own and if it is fast enough The One will get credit and make off with all the theft. People will have lousy jobs and we all will be buried in debt.
IlikedAUH2O on September 4, 2010 at 4:06 AM
Ed, is there a measure of the total number of paid hours worked in America compiled on a monthly basis?
That would be a most enlightening number, I think. And it would reflect the health of the economy far better than jobs lost if one job lost is then counted as two jobs gained through part-time employment.
{^_^}
herself on September 4, 2010 at 4:43 AM
Looks like a “good crisis” is going to waste.
ncborn on September 4, 2010 at 7:01 AM
This!!!
Tapper lays it out. How much are we worse with this administration when the news completely toes the party line in what they report? How many people have lost jobs or lost money because they listen to the economic reporting of the MSM.
You’re right too Iliked, we must consider the source. The media cannot be trusted.
hawkdriver on September 4, 2010 at 7:42 AM
I have a sense that President Obama does not fully understand the concept of the “law of large numbers”
that as the number of samples increases, the average of these samples is likely to reach the mean of the whole population. When relating this concept to finance, it suggests that as a company grows, its chances of sustaining a large percentage in growth diminish. This is because as a company continues to expand, it must grow more and more just to maintain a constant percentage of growth.
As a result President Obama is set on imploding the Federal Government.
MSGTAS on September 4, 2010 at 9:14 AM
those of you who do not understand and publicly acknowledge the AWESOMENESS of this “jobs” report will need to be Re-educated.
Luckily Kathleen Sebelius has begun working on those plans! Soon you can all experience the joy of loving Lord Obama.
Justrand on September 4, 2010 at 9:38 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2