Time for home-brew whiskey?

posted at 9:07 pm on September 3, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Jimmy Carter struck a blow for personal freedom — no, seriously, stop laughing — in 1978, when he made home brewing of beer legal in the US.  As Reason TV says, this led to an explosion of experimentation and interest in beer and ale, and led to the development of the diverse microbrewery industry.  However, home distillation of spirits remains a federal crime, and the onerous tax regime stifles innovation and discourages start-ups.  The result is that only a few bottlers control the spirits industry instead of seeing another explosion of creativity and interest.  When will we free the people to make their own moonshine?

Federal agents still raid distilleries much like they did during Prohibition, and making any amount of moonshine at home is not only illegal, it’s a felony that can carry up to five years in prison. The result is a market dominated by a few big names, where would-be craftsmen are forced to hide their work.

And yet, despite the danger, America is in the midst of “moonshine renaissance,” in which a new wave of hipster hobbyists has joined with old-time ‘shiners to flout the law and do what they love to do.

I’m not sure this is at the top of my political priorities, but it’s certainly a good question.  The biggest issue for legalization could be the loss of tax revenue, or at least that seems to be the federal government’s biggest concern.  But that’s a result of static analysis, assuming that existing consumption would remain the same but then split between those who buy retail and those who make their own.  The experience in microbrewing should demonstrate that people will still buy their alcoholic beverages — but they may take more interest as new products and innovation hit the marketplace.

Even if it didn’t, should the federal government be in the business of prohibiting adults from whipping up their own distilled beverages for their own consumption?  Maybe we should be following Carter’s example and getting the federal government out of the choices of adults in this instance.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Even if it didn’t, should the federal government be in the business of prohibiting adults from whipping up their own distilled beverages for their own consumption?

Until they realize cannabis prohibition is wrong, I don’t care.

Squiggy on September 4, 2010 at 9:51 PM

The fact that federal agents raid residences simply because the owners are cooking up whisky in their garage is precisely why we have a 2nd amendment.

The task of creating laws attracts those who seek to control how other people live, and the task of enforcing laws attracts those most eager to abuse that power.

Not all politicians are corrupt busybodies, and not all police officers are petty tyrants, but both exist in sufficient numbers in each profession that the only way to guarantee that our individual rights are not trampled is through the power the comes from the barrel of a gun.

leereyno on September 6, 2010 at 4:35 AM

…even to put a bottle of Miller Lite in the freezer is a crime.

No, it is not a crime. It is merely illegal. There is a difference. There are also a lot of people in this world who don’t understand the difference, and they make life so much more difficult for those of us who do.

leereyno on September 6, 2010 at 4:55 AM

I love Bulleit Bourbon from KY. Was everywhere here in MI but has been harder to find lately.

If it were legal here I would try to make my own Bourbon.

mechkiller_k on September 7, 2010 at 2:10 PM

Comment pages: 1 2