Uh oh: Another oil platform explodes in gulf; Update: Mile-long “oil sheen” spreading from platform; Update: All seven wells closed off
posted at 12:48 pm on September 2, 2010 by Allahpundit
Three big differences from the Deepwater explosion, right off the bat: (a) This one isn’t owned by BP (and apparently never was, contrary to what one of our commenters claimed in another thread); (b) the 13 crew members are overboard but are all alive; and (c) it’s located in shallow water, so even if the worst occurs and another leak is detected, presumably plugging it would be easier and quicker.
Mariner Energy focuses on oil and gas exploration and production company focused on the Gulf of Mexico. In April, Apache Corp., another independent petroleum company, announced plans to buy Mariner in a cash-and-stock deal valued at $3.9 billion, including the assumption of about $1.2 billion of Mariner’s debt. That deal
is pending.Apache spokesman Bob Dye said the platform is in shallow water.
Responding to an oil spill in shallow water is much easier than in deepwater, where crews depend on remote-operated vehicles access equipment on the sea floor.
More from CNBC:
In comments to CNBC Thursday, a spokesman for Mariner Energy said “it doesn’t appear that there is any spill or sheen to be seen on the water” following the fire.
“The fire occurred away from the well…it wasn’t involved in the area where they had oil producing wells,” said Patrick Cassidy, a spokesman for Mariner. He added that the facility isn’t a drilling rig, but rather a production facility.
DHS claims that the rig wasn’t producing oil and gas when the explosion hit. Time to breathe easy? Maybe not: CNN’s Ed Henry is hearing from the Coast Guard that the platform was in production and that it … wasn’t equipped with a standard blowout preventer. (The crew did, however, allegedly start emergency shutdown before bailing out.) As of an hour ago, the rig was still on fire but I’m not sure what the status is now. Jindal is set to speak within an hour or so. Stand by for updates galore.
Update: WDSU says that because it’s a platform, not a rig, it’s not actively engaged in drilling.
Update: A tip from a reader who, unlike me, knows what he’s talking about:
If the platform is not a drilling platform then it doesn’t need a traditional blowout preventer. The difference being is that with drilling the oil is being forced out at a high rate, therefor need a blowout preventer that can hold back all that pressure. If this platform is a production platform, all it needs is something to stop the flow in the pipes which is flowing with much lower pressure.
Update: How much oil and gas was the platform churning out? CNN:
“Mariner has notified and is working with regulatory authorities in response to this incident,” the statement said. “The cause is not known, and an investigation will be undertaken. During the last week of August 2010, production from this facility averaged approximately 9.2 million cubic feet of natural gas per day and 1,400 barrels of oil and condensate.”
Update: Oh boy. Here we go:
The Coast Guard is saying that a mile-long oil sheen is spreading from the site off an offshore petroleum platform that exploded in the Gulf of Mexico off Louisiana.
The site of the explosion is west of where BP’s massive spill occurred.
Update: Ah, a comforting explanation for the sheen. It’s not oil bubbling up from the seabed; it’s oil that had already been captured and stored on the rig.
Also, Mariner indicated that the fire — which was first reported to the Coast Guard by workers on a nearby rig around 9:20 a.m. (10:20 a.m. ET) — was not sparked by an explosion. It started at one of the platform’s seven active wells, the company said, though its cause is under investigation…
Jindal said that Mariner has told him that all seven wells have been closed off and that what is burning now is from fuel in storage, and not from an active leak.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5
.
When you tell a lie it makes women smile.
LincolntheHun on September 2, 2010 at 4:54 PM
blink
blink
blink
blink
blink
blink
blink
blink
blink
blink
blink, FTW!
Christien on September 2, 2010 at 4:55 PM
Speaking of nutjobs, did alGore get his massage this morning? Maybe it was a strike of pent up chakra that started the fire.
petefrt on September 2, 2010 at 4:59 PM
Democrat October Surprise in Sept?
JellyToast on September 2, 2010 at 4:59 PM
No, you jerk.
onlineanalyst on September 2, 2010 at 5:09 PM
Maybe Charlie Sheen put snakes in Rosie’s snorkel?
It. Could Happen.
hillbillyjim on September 2, 2010 at 5:16 PM
Then you didn’t make any sense at all.
blink on September 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM
The Coast Guard is backing off the claim that an oil sheen is present.
“The Coast Guard initially reported that an oil sheen a mile long and 100 feet wide had begun to spread from the site of the blast, about 200 miles west of the site of BP’s massive spill. But hours later, Coast Guard Cmdr. Cheri Ben-Iesau said crews were unable to find any spill.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/02/oil-rig-explodes-in-the-g_n_703525.html
juliesa on September 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM
Last report from platform-
Fire out, Still alot of Black smoke that looks like it is coming from a compressor unit. Part of the platform’s deck is still glowing red no noticeable sheen,
Guest1.1 on September 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM
Should have read “Latest Report from Platform”
Guest1.1 on September 2, 2010 at 5:20 PM
Good article here: Oil rig platform catches fire in Gulf of Mexico
From the article: “The company reported there were seven active wells on the platform and one caught fire, but all are now shut in. Mariner also reported the platform produced an average of 1,400 barrels of oil per day, as well as 1,800 barrels of natural gas each day.
Mariner says stored barrels were the ones that caught fire and that dispersants are on standby if needed.”
slickwillie2001 on September 2, 2010 at 5:20 PM
oh nooooooo. Not an oil sheen. God please not an oil sheen. Guess we’ll have to shut down all the oil wells again and see if we can’t finish the job that Sherman started on Louisiana back during the end of the war between the states.
kens on September 2, 2010 at 5:32 PM
WTC ’93; WTC 9/11. You’re right. We should never connect dots. Not even two dots.
shawk on September 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM
AP, the condition of the crew members is what should be in the headline. Not your pi$$ poor attempt at scare mongering.
Jim708 on September 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! UGH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
canopfor on September 2, 2010 at 6:13 PM
Please do not link to porn sites.
Immolate on September 2, 2010 at 6:21 PM
Is blink still here or am I a nutjob for asking?
catmman on September 2, 2010 at 6:38 PM
That’s not a nutjob question. You know what a nutjob question is.
Have you learned anything in the past few hours?
blink on September 2, 2010 at 6:41 PM
Heh.
Christien on September 2, 2010 at 6:43 PM
catmman, let me explain why your earlier example was stupid.
Imagine I tried to claim that baseball was unfair by stating, for example, that one team gets 3 outs yet the other team gets 5 outs. You would tell me that the factual flaws in my argument prevent my example from being germane. And you would be correct.
This is exactly what happened with your example.
You stated that this explosion was suspicious because there was a moratorium on all production wells (there was no such moratorium). Your factual flaw prevented your example from being germane.
blink on September 2, 2010 at 6:47 PM
I’ve learned you’re nuts. What are you just lying in wait for someone to say something you don’t approve of?
darwin on September 2, 2010 at 6:52 PM
You’ve learned nothing.
Good Lt on September 2, 2010 at 7:08 PM
Yep. They can’t resist. Invariably, they stop feeling better about themselves and have to come back to get another fix of faux-superiority.
Christien on September 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM
I never said the explosion was suspicious because of the moratorium in place. I was making the point that asking questions about the nature of the explosion wasn’t specifically the act of a nutjob. I stated that the context of the question asked was germane to whether it was in fact nutjobery.
If the question were asked using the example I gave then it wouldn’t be nutjobish to ask. Initially you said context didn’t matter, then you said I was right, but that anyone asking even that kind of question was a nutjob.
As the the ‘factual flaw’ in my example, I also stated that it may not be entirely analogous since the extent of the moratorium may not have applied in this specific case.
I stated that I was not a fan of any conspiratorial theory, but that asking questions was fine, given that on the first page of comments you were telling people they were nutjobs for doing just that.
catmman on September 2, 2010 at 7:36 PM
Oh, for…
Count to 10 on September 2, 2010 at 7:57 PM
Ojesus has saved or created 6,000,000 nutjobs.
Or something.
For fuck’s sake, you all would argue that shaved ice melts steel. Let it go.
hillbillyjim on September 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM
Yes, it’s Obama’s fault you guys are nuts.
Nonfactor on September 2, 2010 at 8:29 PM
The sheer coincidence of this incident given that the Gulf has been free of such mishaps for decades and two in one year is staggering, just staggering I tell ya!
Dr. ZhivBlago on September 2, 2010 at 8:42 PM
Grand slam shawk.
Two dots we didn’t connect…and still haven’t. Our internal security hasn’t improved one iota.
Dark-Star on September 2, 2010 at 8:51 PM
All your talk of shaved ice…
FOOL! Everyone knows there is no such thing as ice in this world of global warming!
catmman on September 2, 2010 at 9:10 PM
Anyone but me wonder how come all of a sudden there are 2 explosions in 1 area when there hasn’t been ANY trouble for decades.
Also explosions, VA coal mine, natural gas refinery, oil refinery, a lot of accidents? lately at fossil fuel sites all over the country.
It’s the Chicago way, the end justifies the means.
CAP AND TRADE ANYONE.
concernedsenior on September 2, 2010 at 9:22 PM
Well now, isn’t this a coincidence… the fools just got shot down again by a judge and….oh my, ANOTHER explosion. 40+ years of no explosions and Barry comes on the scene and there are TWO, one right after the other. Treason you say? Well I do say!
Hey Barry, we got your number, along with all your nutjob boobs that follow you around. Wow, this kinda sounds like something Bill Ayers group would love to pull off. He did say “he wished he could have done more”!
The GOP better put this on their list of things to investigate.
hopefloats on September 2, 2010 at 9:39 PM
The sheer coincidence of this incident given that the Gulf has been free of such mishaps for decades and two in one year is staggering, just staggering I tell ya!
Dr. ZhivBlago on September 2, 2010 at 8:42 PM
My sentiments, exactly….
theaddora on September 2, 2010 at 9:42 PM
No, but he asked.
blink on September 2, 2010 at 10:03 PM
Feeling superior to a conspiracy theorists isn’t much of an ego boost.
blink on September 2, 2010 at 10:05 PM
Really? Gee, let’s take a look….
The problem was that all wells were never “supposed to be shut down” so your example doesn’t give you any credibility with respect to questioning the timing.
Have you learned the difference between an production platform and a drilling rig? Do you understand the difference between drilling an oil well and operating an oil well?
blink on September 2, 2010 at 10:11 PM
Why can’t Obama protect the sea creatures? Why does he hate them?
faraway on September 2, 2010 at 10:12 PM
You are a clown. You don’t know anything about oil production. Stop while you are behind.
faraway on September 2, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Try to learn more than what your fed by the news before making assertions.
There have been over 800 fires and explosions on offshore platforms and rigs in past 10 years. Try to remember that just because you didn’t hear about them doesn’t mean that they didn’t happen.
blink on September 2, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Ha ha. Really? Bring it.
blink on September 2, 2010 at 10:19 PM
blink, please provide us with a list of approved questions that you think are still unanswered regarding this fire?
faraway on September 2, 2010 at 10:22 PM
You can ask anything you want.
But if a question implies that any member of the executive branch had a hand in causing this incident, then the questioner is a nutjob.
blink on September 2, 2010 at 10:34 PM
You are disgusting. You think the Supreme Court had something to do with this????
faraway on September 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM
You seemed to be overly emotional about questions about any possible coincidence between this fire and the other explosion. I’m surprised your first thought was that this was related to Obama. Sounds more like a BP or safety question to me. Can you elaborate?
faraway on September 2, 2010 at 10:47 PM
No. Would you like to state any other stupid inferences?
blink on September 2, 2010 at 10:51 PM
I’m not emotional at all. I’ve been very blunt about my definition of a nutjob with respect to this incident. The conspiracy theorists seem emotional.
blink on September 2, 2010 at 10:53 PM
You seem to become unhinged when people mention “coincidences” – you call them a nutjob. But, it seems to me that this is not in any way connected to Obama, yet your first thought is Obama. Why would you think like this?
faraway on September 2, 2010 at 10:58 PM
Establishing a criteria that defines someone as a nutjob is unhinged?
In that case, then I content that you’ve become unhinged at me.
OK
Are you really comfortable claiming that my first thought was Obama? Isn’t it possible that Obama and the executive branch were my 4th thought? (Hint: Check my first comment on this thread on page 1 – and next time, try not to make foolish claims.)
blink on September 2, 2010 at 11:04 PM
OK, you are rambling now. First its anything tied to Obama, now it’s any type of coincidence. We’re getting dizzy.
Let me back up and try this again. Can you please give us a list of approved questions that you would like answered in relation to this incident? Are you at all curious?
faraway on September 2, 2010 at 11:12 PM
WTF? The comment Nazi is still at it?
Dude, get some rest … tomorrow’s another day.
darwin on September 2, 2010 at 11:25 PM
Of course I’m interested. I’m very affiliated with the offshore GOM O&G industry. I need to know the circumstances of the incident when the information becomes available. There’s no reason for me to speculate at this point.
No. It isn’t, nor was it ever, “any type of coincidence.”
Btw, please explain what the coincidence is with respect to this incident.
blink on September 3, 2010 at 7:30 AM
Oh please. Your attempting to control my comments as much as you claim I’m trying to control other’s comments.
blink on September 3, 2010 at 7:31 AM
It does appear very suspicious under the promotion of agenda and upcoming elections. I wouldn’t put anything past the folks in high places right now, and the eco-terrorist.. just sayin’! They will stop at nothing to pass their job killing agenda, Cap & Trade will be high on agenda during lame duck session.
Dakotobol on September 3, 2010 at 9:32 AM
So according to some on this thread, if I were to have sex in Hawaii and 9 months later a child (any child) is born in China then there must be some connection because both border on the Pacific Ocean!
On another note there must be something eerily similar between a go kart to a Mack truck because both have wheels.
Kermit on September 3, 2010 at 9:40 AM
I see the conspiracy concerns have continued.
Bradky on September 3, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Keep posting cane. Glad to see you back here.
tigerlily on September 3, 2010 at 5:42 PM
Yes, this was indeed cane_loader’s best. He claimed that possibly producing a thousand absentee ballots is the same as blowing up a production platform in the Gulf of Mexico.
I don’t have a problem with him being so wrong. I have a problem with him being so stupid.
blink on September 3, 2010 at 6:39 PM
Just so as not to allow the bibk person to have the last word. FO
Caststeel on September 4, 2010 at 5:19 AM
Word
blink on September 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5