Gallup: Voters trust GOP more on, well, everything

posted at 11:36 am on September 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Well, okay, not everything. Democrats still get more trust from voters on the environment by 23 points in this latest Gallup survey, and health care comes in at a virtual tie. Since those are near the bottom of the electorate’s priority list in the midterms, it hardly matters. Republicans have taken the lead on every other issue on the radars of voters, including a stunning eleven point lead on the economy, a traditional Democratic strength:

A new USA Today/Gallup poll finds Americans saying the Republicans in Congress would do a better job than the Democrats in Congress of handling seven of nine key election issues. The parties are essentially tied on healthcare, with the environment being the lone Democratic strength.

The Republicans’ advantage on most issues is an indication of the currently favorable political environment for the party. Of particular note is the parity between the two parties on healthcare, an issue on which Americans historically have viewed the Democrats as superior.

A similar USA Today/Gallup poll conducted in October 2006, just prior to Democrats’ major gains in that fall’s elections, highlights the potential implications of these findings. That poll, which includes several issues measured in the current survey, found the Democrats leading on all eight issues tested at that time, including some usual Republican strengths like terrorism and moral values.

Byron York looks at the difference four years of Democratic control of Congress makes:

Back in October 2006, just before Democrats won control of Congress, Gallup asked the traditional question, “Do you think the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress would do a better job dealing with [the following issue]…” In October ’06, Democrats had 64 percent to 35 percent lead on health care — a 39 percentage-point advantage. Now, on the same issue, after Democrats passed their long-dreamed-of national health care bill, the result is 44 percent for Democrats versus 43 percent for Republicans — a virtual tie. That is an enormous advantage to have thrown away during four years in power.

The news is just as bad for Democrats on the economy. In October 2006, Democrats held a 53 to 37 lead over Republicans on the issue. Now, after Democrats passed an $862 billion stimulus bill and touted 2010 as the “summer of recovery,” Republicans hold a 49 to 38 lead. Democrats have gone from having a 16 point lead to being 11 points behind.

The difference is one between theory and practice. Democrats promised to deliver more services and more redistribution while remaining moderate and fiscally responsible, and never mentioned tax increases. That’s one hell of a sales pitch, but it’s also completely unrealistic. George W, Bush kept Democrats in Congress from putting much of their plans into motion until they bypassed him on the FY2009 budget. When Barack Obama took office, they passed the ’09 budget and started wholesale implementation of their radical agenda.

It took Republicans twelve years to dissipate their trust and credibility with voters after taking control of Congress, and six years of one-party governance in Washington. It has taken Democrats less than a third of both time frames to utterly destroy their standing with voters on nearly every issue. That’s quite an achievement, and impressive in its own way. The numbers on the issues explain why Democrats are looking at the business end of a historical rebuke in the midterms, and why campaigning on George Bush really won’t address their problem at all. Voters aren’t worried about Bush any longer; they’re worried about the people in office now, and don’t like what they see at all.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The system worked.

wildweasel on September 1, 2010 at 11:41 AM

We have to pass it to find out what’s in it.

Good Lt on September 1, 2010 at 11:41 AM

Boy, that evil genius, bumbling idiot, conniving mastermind, ignorant buffoon Bush sure is good/lucky to have so totally destroyed the Democratic name. Dems better get to the bottom of how he did it so they can run against him successfully in 2012.

NotCoach on September 1, 2010 at 11:42 AM

I’m guessing that whole, “budget? We don’t need no stinkin’ budget” didn’t help them much, either.

DrAllecon on September 1, 2010 at 11:43 AM

It’s not that I trust the GOP more, it’s just that I trust the Democrats less.

rbj on September 1, 2010 at 11:43 AM

“We have to pass this bill so we can discover how much you are going to hate us.”

Bishop on September 1, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Voters aren’t worried about Bush any longer; they’re worried about the people in office now, and don’t like what they see at all.

The Dems will blame Bush anyway.

IT’S ALL THEY HAVE.

Guardian on September 1, 2010 at 11:44 AM

Allowing Democrats control of the treasury is like giving matches and gasoline to 6 year old boys.

Don’t be surprised if your house is reduced to glowing embers in a matter of minutes.

Idiots.

NoDonkey on September 1, 2010 at 11:44 AM

The Democratic Party, Wile E. Coyote Super Geniuses, all.

Lily on September 1, 2010 at 11:55 AM

Risky .. Extreme

J_Crater on September 1, 2010 at 11:58 AM

question:
As election results roll in on Nov 2nd, are they blacked out on the west coast till voting there is done?

a capella on September 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM

In October ’06, Democrats had 64 percent to 35 percent lead on health care — a 39 percentage-point advantage.

Borrow 10, change 60 to 50, maybe a 29-point advantage. As an infamous misunderestimated former President once said, fuzzy math.

Steve Z on September 1, 2010 at 12:02 PM

Cool. What gets me is that they still own the environmental issue, Between the soviet industrialization and Mao’s tiger eradication program- this won’t end well.

abobo on September 1, 2010 at 12:04 PM

It’s not that I trust the GOP more, it’s just that I trust the Democrats less.

rbj on September 1, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Instapundit posted a great email from a reader on this.

Don’t mistake these polling results for people falling in love with the GOP or the Tea Party or anything like that.

This is a referendum on Obama and the Democrats. It’s not about the GOP, bercuase the GOP has been essentially irrelevant in the past several years as they have no power to stop anything Democrats do. Democrats scream like the GOP is still in power and that saying “no” to horrifically stupid Democrat legislation was as good as votes blocking it. The GOP all voted against Obamacare and stimulus, and they still passed.

So we can’t get cocky – as tempting as it may be to rub the noses of arrogant O-bots who spent the last four years feeling their oats about how awesome they were or something. Stay humble, stay happy, provide guidance and information when debating, articulate the timeless economic and philosophical principles that made America great without shame, and try to keep a level head about you. Once the GOP is back in power, it’s back to business as usual – the Democrat-Media complex will be relentless every day. Don’t give them ammo.

Good Lt on September 1, 2010 at 12:05 PM

I implicitly trust the Left to steal as much as they can. The Right, not so much.

OldEnglish on September 1, 2010 at 12:05 PM

I implicitly trust the Left to steal as much as they can. The Right, not so much.

OldEnglish on September 1, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Why? I understand that the left is in the business of redistribution, but why do you implicitly trust the right not to steal as much as they can, when they often do?

ernesto on September 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM

Now, on the same issue, after Democrats passed their long-dreamed-of national health care bill, the result is 44 percent for Democrats versus 43 percent for Republicans — a virtual tie.

BUT WAIT! WAIT!! We “Haters” haven’t been through THE WON’s re-education camps yet! Once we’ve had our thinking “corrected” by our time in the Camps, you’re really gonna see those approval numbers jump!

oldleprechaun on September 1, 2010 at 12:11 PM

The net result of Obama’s failed policies is that consumers are reluctant to spend, entrepreneurs are reluctant to invest, and employers are reluctant to hire to the degree necessary to spur economic growth.

J_Crater on September 1, 2010 at 12:15 PM

ernesto on September 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM

It is only a matter of severity. My experience has been that I get to keep a little more when the Right is in power.

And, for the record, I hate that term “redistribution of wealth” It’s theft, pure and simple.

OldEnglish on September 1, 2010 at 12:20 PM

“I won”…

right2bright on September 1, 2010 at 12:20 PM

“We have to pass this bill so we can discover how much you are going to hate us.”

Bishop on September 1, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Actually, we’re going to see how much the lunatic Pelosi hates the rest of us when the new House Speaker grabs the gavel from her cold, bony fingers. She’ll probably hiss and spit, so my suggestion is that Boehnner wears garlic and keeps a silver cross handy. He should probably carry a flask of water. I hear it makes witches melt. (Personally, I would add industrial bleach and call in the fire department.)

Cody1991 on September 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM

And, for the record, I hate that term “redistribution of wealth” It’s theft, pure and simple.

But but but the government said it’s OK to take an undue share of your money and property at gunpoint becuase you’re now your brother’s keeper!

Therefore, fork it over, wingnuts!

And this is what Obamacrats call “morality.”

Good Lt on September 1, 2010 at 12:30 PM

Why? I understand that the left is in the business of redistribution, but why do you implicitly trust the right not to steal as much as they can, when they often do?

ernesto on September 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM

Please state facts. Please research and post what the TOTAL deficits for each of the following Presidents:
Regan (R) = 8 years
Bush (R) = 4 years
Clinton (D) = 8 years
Bush (R)= 8 years
Obama (D) = < 2 years

And the deficits under the following Speakers of the House (Only the House can create a Spending Bill)
Tip Oneil (D)= 10 years
Jim Wright (D)= 2 years
Tom Foley (D) = 6 years
Newt Gingrich (R) = 4 years
Dennis Hastert (R) = 8 years
Nancy Pelosi (D) = < 4 years

I know the answers, do you?

barnone on September 1, 2010 at 12:30 PM

Cody1991 on September 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM

Don’t forget her flying monkeys – they can bite.

OldEnglish on September 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM

It took Republicans twelve years to dissipate their trust and credibility with voters after taking control of Congress, and six years of one-party governance in Washington. It has taken Democrats less than a third of both time frames to utterly destroy their standing with voters on nearly every issue.

Behold the power of our Fully Operational Battle Star!

Um …next time, Sir, make sure it isn’t pointed at us.

Lily on September 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM

Former Obama Voter Pleased with Recent Identity Theft

Mervis Winter on September 1, 2010 at 12:35 PM

question:
As election results roll in on Nov 2nd, are they blacked out on the west coast till voting there is done?

a capella on September 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM

No. I think each state’s results start to come in as soon as the polls close in that state. This won’t help Dino Rossi much at all (since almost all voting in Washington is by mail), but it might help Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman a little bit. We can hope.

acasilaco on September 1, 2010 at 12:42 PM

Don’t forget her flying monkeys – they can bite.

OldEnglish on September 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM

Yes. Waxman comes to mind. Or is that a bat? When I look at him I just assume that he sleeps upside down and hanging on something.

Cody1991 on September 1, 2010 at 12:42 PM

It has taken Democrats less than a third of both time frames to utterly destroy their standing with voters on nearly every issue.

That’s what happens when you promise everything to everybody and assure them there’s no cost, trade-off or pain that will result.

It’s called reality, and it happens sometimes.

Good Lt on September 1, 2010 at 12:44 PM

and six years of one-party governance

More like four years thanks to Jim Jeffords.

RW_theoriginal on September 1, 2010 at 12:44 PM

I am really really hoping that when the new people come into congress they will actually bring a philosphy that will actually make government smaller and more efficient while at the same time offering more freedom to small business.

My hopes may be a pipe dream. If they are then what? We get the corrupt Dems back?

I want to stop the see-saw and really fix things! I’m willing to sacrifice for that. And I don’t mean more taxes, that is going the wrong way.

I mean less government! I’ll drive on pot holes and gravel roads forever if it means we get the country back on track!

petunia on September 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM

It’s all Bush’s fault! (Registered TM of the DNC)

GarandFan on September 1, 2010 at 12:59 PM

It took Republicans twelve years to dissipate their trust and credibility with voters after taking control of Congress, and six years of one-party governance in Washington. It has taken Democrats less than a third of both time frames to utterly destroy their standing with voters on nearly every issue.

Naturally! Because the Dimmocrats are much smarter than us and are overachievers to boot! Behold their awesome power and tremble!

ya2daup on September 1, 2010 at 1:01 PM

The difference is one between theory propaganda and practice. Even any Democrats who paid attention had to know this was phony.

burt on September 1, 2010 at 1:07 PM

Republicans in Congress would do a better job… handling seven of nine

Resistance is futile?

Terp Mole on September 1, 2010 at 1:20 PM

Kamikaze (Obooba agenda) heads towards the USS Hornet (America), Bofors gunners (Tea Partiers) blow him to bits plunging his flaming wreck (Dem Party) into the sea (political oblivion).

Akzed on September 1, 2010 at 1:25 PM

And, for the record, I hate that term “redistribution of wealth” It’s theft, pure and simple.

OldEnglish on September 1, 2010 at 12:20 PM

So at what point do you draw the line between taxes as theft, and taxes as necessity?

ernesto on September 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM

The greatest challenge Obama will face when he starts running for a second term is how to start blaming things on his own first term. “That’s not the Obama I thought I knew.”

pedestrian on September 1, 2010 at 1:53 PM

So at what point do you draw the line between taxes as theft, and taxes as necessity?

ernesto on September 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM

If it was consented to in the Constitution it’s not theft. Income redistribution is not there.

pedestrian on September 1, 2010 at 1:55 PM

So at what point do you draw the line between taxes as theft, and taxes as necessity?

ernesto on September 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM

Once it moves beyond the scope of protecting life, liberty, and property government is no longer proper or moral.

anuts on September 1, 2010 at 2:21 PM

As Yogi Berra once said, “it seems like deja vu all over again.”
This harkens back to the JIMMY CARTER era .
Sadly Obama has done enough damage to destroy our country by the time he signed OBAMACARE

ELMO Q on September 1, 2010 at 2:43 PM

Yeah. Let’s have more Pelosi prancing around with a big, over-size gavel in her hands.

kens on September 1, 2010 at 3:42 PM

Don’t give into the politics of fear!

Choose the politics of non-sequitur and recrimination instead!

HitNRun on September 1, 2010 at 4:48 PM

Yes, and 75 percent want Congress to cut thier own salaries.

jdawg on September 1, 2010 at 9:57 PM

I sense a dog-wagging coming before November.

DrZin on September 2, 2010 at 10:04 AM