Matthews: Will the Beck/Palin religious right revival derail GOP support for gay marriage?
posted at 9:27 pm on September 1, 2010 by Allahpundit
Beck fans (and Hot Air readers) will see the punchline coming, but it’s the rep from the Log Cabin Republicans who has the fun of actually delivering it. In his rush to indict Beck as some sort of doctrinaire social con, though, Matthews inadvertently raises an interesting question: What’s Sarahcuda’s position on gay marriage these days? During Campaign ’08 she said she supported a federal marriage amendment to ban it nationwide but also said at the debate with Biden that she backed lesser protections for gays, like hospital visitations. Then again, she also said at the time that she supported a path to citizenship for illegals and I’m, er, reasonably sure she no longer feels that way. Factor in her surprising libertarian-lite opinion on overenforcement of drug laws and there’s a chance — a slim chance — that she’s changed a bit on this issue too. She can’t move much lest she alienate the social cons she’s counting on if she runs, but it would help scramble the media narrative about her among the centrists she needs to win over. Hmmmmm.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
It’s a State issue, Cwishy. No go stare at the crease.
Key West Reader on September 1, 2010 at 9:30 PM
That’s Chrissy. Always asking the most important questions of the day! The ISSUES most Americans are interested in.
And he wonders why his viewership is so low.
GarandFan on September 1, 2010 at 9:30 PM
Chrissy’s hair is mussed… hmmm
Ugly on September 1, 2010 at 9:31 PM
I’m ok with same sex civil unions. Just don’t call it marriage. It can have the same bindings and benefits as such.
Dandapani on September 1, 2010 at 9:32 PM
What’s Barry Poppins stance on homosexual marriages?
darwin-t on September 1, 2010 at 9:34 PM
Vell,Tingles should vake vure that hiz paperenzee
is inz zee herr properenzee order,because,atz za
next herr Rally,our Glorious Leader,Herr SarahCudainzee,
vill make Herr Tingles feel more herr Tingly vhen she
speaks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So,Tingles thinks that SarahCuda is morphing into a
“FatherLand Scenario”,ala,1939!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!! NUTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dam* that Liberal Kool-Aid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
canopfor on September 1, 2010 at 9:36 PM
I will not be commenting on this subject tonight. Have a nice night everyone.
Tommy_G on September 1, 2010 at 9:37 PM
Chrissy doesn’t do homework on his targets, he just assumes they hate everyone as much as he does…
d1carter on September 1, 2010 at 9:37 PM
Beck appears to have not great reservations about Gay Marriage. As much as I like him, it’s one of his positions I don’t like.
Amend the US Constitution to ban Gay Marriage and to make marriage in all of America a union of one man and one woman.
Faster please.
moochy on September 1, 2010 at 9:39 PM
This is just further proof that people don’t understand that there was nothing Christian about that “revival”. This “Third Great Awakening” seems to be a whole lot about conservative and really more so libertarian politics and not so much about….well, ya know….CHRISTIANITY. Is the pro-abortion atheist Ayn Rand going to be the new Mary? Maybe “chuches” should be teaching ‘The Road to Serfdom’ along side the Bible.
D0WNT0WN on September 1, 2010 at 9:39 PM
He won’t let the facts confuse him, will he?
Purple Fury on September 1, 2010 at 9:41 PM
It’s useless trying to predict what Palin will do until she does it, but it does make a great deal of tactical political sense for her to commit one major heresy against the Right if she wants to maximize her appeal (think Bill Clinton and Sista Souljah). Some limited concession on gay marriage is the easiest path to choose, and while most social conservatives be happy, I don’t think in the context of 2012, given who is president and given Palin’s stand-up track record in liberal-fighting, I don’t think its a deal breaker.
Robert_Paulson on September 1, 2010 at 9:42 PM
That’s funny. I wasn’t aware there was any support to begin with. In the GOP, it’s an 85-15 issue, but that 15% happens to have the highest profile because it’s concentrated in the Beltway. The pro-gay marriage voice control the opinion in DC nowadays, and to the libs, they’re useful idiots, so why not?
Tell me I’m wrong. Tell me that there’s some sort of giant libertarian groundswell in the GOP and that we suddenly support the redefinition of marriage.
KingGold on September 1, 2010 at 9:42 PM
D0WNT0WN on September 1, 2010 at 9:39 PM
Still have not read Ayn Rand. Not sure if I want to.
Ugly on September 1, 2010 at 9:43 PM
That should read: “and while most social conservatives won’t be happy“
Robert_Paulson on September 1, 2010 at 9:44 PM
Fair amount of support among top Republicans, actually, starting with Dick Cheney.
Allahpundit on September 1, 2010 at 9:44 PM
I can hear a lot of mental fuses poppin` with that one. :)
ThePrez on September 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM
I haven’t kept up with PC terminology, that’s the first time I’ve heard “marriage equality” used in place of gay marriage. Does anyone really think changing the terminology actually changes anyone’s viewpoint?
mbs on September 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM
FIFY
Ronnie on September 1, 2010 at 9:49 PM
The RINO Creed
There is no other issue but the gay marriage issue and no other issues shall come before it. Amen.
Blake on September 1, 2010 at 9:49 PM
You did read my first paragraph, right? The one about Beltway opinion leaders driving the conversation?
KingGold on September 1, 2010 at 9:50 PM
Who in the Republican party leaders supports gay marriage other than Cheney?
d1carter on September 1, 2010 at 9:50 PM
Two mistakes by Chrissy. First, which was noted by his guest, Beck is OK with gay marriage. Second, Beck is not a Christian. He is a Mormon. Christians do not believe that God was once just a man, that there are millions of Gods out there, or that in the afterlife, we will become Gods and have our own planets where we spawn all of the souls on our planets by having endless celestial sex with our multiple goddess wives. Not do christians believe that the American Indians are a lost tribe of jews, which Beck claimed on his 8/18 Fox show, even giving people a web address to order the Mormon documentary he was hawking. There is a WIDE gulf between Beck and christianity.
He’s been great at exposing Obama, but the more he promotes his version of religion to his audience, the more they will abandon him.
Phildorex on September 1, 2010 at 9:50 PM
The redefinition of marriage is a losing issue…
I absolutely don’t give a rip what he thinks… especially since his grandchild was purposely brought into this world without a father…
ninjapirate on September 1, 2010 at 9:51 PM
This issue is not going to stop the tsunami…
d1carter on September 1, 2010 at 9:52 PM
Seems like it does.
SDnocoen on September 1, 2010 at 9:55 PM
You should, building your own Galt’s Gulch can be a satisfying hobby. Plus, you get to collect 8-track tapes.
Bishop on September 1, 2010 at 9:55 PM
Chrissy, do you ever go to church?
chai on September 1, 2010 at 9:56 PM
Then why do you have to make disrespectful comments about his religion if they will abandon him anyways.
Maybe because insulting another religion is the only way you feel good about your religion.
PrezHussein on September 1, 2010 at 9:58 PM
I don’t think it was disrespectful just truthful.
right4life on September 1, 2010 at 10:02 PM
I do wonder when Beck starts talking about ‘the spirit’…I wonder what spirit?
Anyone who says they are conservative and for gay marriage is either very ignorant….or not conservative.
the so-called ‘libertarians’ are just liberals…ever read lewrockwell.com? they sound like mad-dog lefties.
right4life on September 1, 2010 at 10:03 PM
most top republicans are not conservative. and they hold those that are in contempt.
right4life on September 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM
Yeah, this crap that Mormons are not Christian is bullshit and offensive. Knock it off. It makes you sound like a rube.
Blake on September 1, 2010 at 10:05 PM
Again we have to visit this 61 days before the elections distraction? UGGGH.
No culture has ever survived allowing this type of dumming-down of MARRIAGE.
This whole civil union was just a joke, a gateway proposal to get their foot in the door to get the radical gay activists what they wanted (and Progressives) which is to destroy the “COUNTRY CLASS” family structure and replace it with the state.
If there is no moral component to MARRIAGE then why have any rules at all, 5……4…..3…..until 2 gays want to marry a 3rd gay, and they’ve all been together for 30 years, etc. etc. Why deny the threesome the rights that others have? Why deny the foursome? What about those that want to lower the age of Marriage and marry those 15 or 16? What about those that want to marry their goats? they want to leave their estates to their pet gerbils?
Without a moral component / restraint our culture is headed only one direction…….down……..and that means GLENN BECK was right to focus on something besides politics on 8/28.
PappyD61 on September 1, 2010 at 10:05 PM
truth hurts.
right4life on September 1, 2010 at 10:06 PM
Phildorex on September 1, 2010 at 10:09 PM
It has also been the longstanding position of our Synod that the LDS is not a Christian denomination, for it explicitly rejects the historic confession of the Christian church as expressed, for example, in the Creeds. So in our judgment, yes, there is a problem in your participating in such a prayer.
http://www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=4650
right4life on September 1, 2010 at 10:09 PM
While the Catholic Church would reject nothing that is true or good in Mormonism or any other world religion, Catholic theology would have to note that there is a tremendous amount in Mormonism that is neither true nor good. Further, because Mormonism presents itself as a form of Christianity yet is incompatible with the historic Christian faith, sound pastoral practice would need to warn the Christian faithful: Mormon theology is blasphemous, polytheistic, and cannot be considered on par with the theology of other Christian groups.
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/quickquestions/keyword/Mormons
right4life on September 1, 2010 at 10:13 PM
I think there are more of us on the right who are ok with gay marriage than people may think.
I’m with Dick!! (GOProud shout make that shirt!)
Either way I think it is a truly STUPID issue to be on the forefront. The economy is much more important. Too many on the right are single issue people.
Ampersand on September 1, 2010 at 10:17 PM
moochy on September 1, 2010 at 9:39 PM
I think that’s due to his Libertarian streak.
One thing I do notice is that some on the right have trouble with the Mormon thing. I sure don’t. Curious.
Gob on September 1, 2010 at 10:19 PM
This is the White House trying change the subject by injecting homosexual marriage into the conversation when most people could give a s#it about it.
darwin-t on September 1, 2010 at 10:22 PM
+100!!!
EXACTLY! This issue is way down on the list. Chrissy is flailing and trying to cover for the dems. He comes of very nervous in my opinion.
Ampersand on September 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM
I am not afraid of honest debate about the definition of marriage. Let the people decide, not activist judges. That’s what those of us who are strict constructionists have advocated at least since Roe v. Wade on a whole range of social issues settled by the judiciary against the will of the people.
Historically, marriage was a church ritual before it became a function of the government approximately 500 years ago. I am a Christian who supports civil agreements between two consenting adults to protect their legal preferences regarding their property, health care decisions, etc. I hope the next Congress enacts civil agreement legislation before this issue comes before the SCOTUS.
Terrie on September 1, 2010 at 10:30 PM
Gob on September 1, 2010 at 10:19 PM
I should clarify…I have seen some strong opinions on Mormonism on this thread and I do not have a problem with those…I know the people who posted them have strong beliefs on the matter and their opinion is interesting to me. I know the deeply religious Christians have trouble with Mormonism.
I was saying (before I read the strong posts) that I notice some intolerance of Mormonism because Mitt Romney was once Gov of mASS and I noticed a lot on Conservatives had trouble with Mormonism. Most I heard did NOT know a lot about the religion…it just seemed knee-jerk. That part I did not understand. The uniformed uneasyness.
I remember even Mike Galligher being uncomfortable with it years back. It has just been curious to me. I can see those who are really religious and informed have substantial problems with it and I don’t begrudge them that.
Gob on September 1, 2010 at 10:33 PM
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, which Glenn Beck belongs to, defines itself as the restored Church of the New Testament. The Catholic Church defines itself as the continuation of the Church of the New Testament.
Glenn Beck doesn’t seem to understand that his Church is against non-traditional marriage.
PrezHussein on September 1, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Further proof the left just doesn’t “get” the Beck rally. He’s promoting faith and a return to God, but he’s promoting religiousity in a personal sense. Beck does not generally support appropriating the power of the federal government to force morality on others. He wants people to rekindle their personal, individual faith in God. If individuals and families are faithful, larger communities and the country as a whole also will be.
Firefly_76 on September 1, 2010 at 10:43 PM
The left should realize (and fear) that Beck’s efforts will likely go a long way in unifying conservative strains (libertarians more interested in the tea party, social cons more interested in Christian revival). Rather than expressly “picking” an issue(s) and leaving factions out of the tent, his efforts could create a neutral space that both strains can feel comfortable in.
Firefly_76 on September 1, 2010 at 10:49 PM
Natural Law exactly as the forefathers knew it to be.
One man, one woman.
True_King on September 1, 2010 at 10:53 PM
Would someone please remind Christopher that the Republican party isn’t exactly fanatic about Glenn Beck. He is an equal opportunity offender when it comes to the parties. The proof of that is republican leaders that are in the “Cross hairs” (Figuratively of course)That will go as far as to chide him on the floor of the house and senate. He goes after republicans just as hard as democrats, and they can’t stand it.
webdemon on September 1, 2010 at 10:56 PM
Derail GOP support for “gay marriage”?
When was it ever on the rails?
Rocks on September 1, 2010 at 11:00 PM
All the folks who are positive that Mormons are not Christians, how will you vote if Gov. Romney is the Republican candidate? Just curious.
Cindy Munford on September 1, 2010 at 11:29 PM
Exactly. What he’s saying isn’t rocket science. Everyone wants to twist his words and assign some nefarious motive to what he’s doing.
darwin on September 1, 2010 at 11:37 PM
I don’t get it. Don’t any of you have gay siblings, children, co-workers, neighbors? If you do – do you really think that they are perverts?
There really are more than a few people out there who will not vote for Republicans because they perceive them as homophobes. If they read some of the comments here, then they surely will have confirmation of that belief.
If Republicans don’t start winning more elections, then we’re going to continue with a government that is much further away from the sum of beliefs of most people who visit Hot Air than the alternatives. This has never made any sense to me, despite seeing it happen over and over. Social conservatives wait for the “pure” candidates – and end up with a President Obama and a Speaker Pelosi.
Ugh.
pbundy on September 1, 2010 at 11:42 PM
So now the Left is using Teh Gays as a wedge issue. Nice. I feel so loved and needed.
SouthernGent on September 1, 2010 at 11:45 PM
We love you SG. Hey, are you near the coast in SC? I’m in Va Beach. Hopefully Earl won’t smack us too hard.
darwin on September 1, 2010 at 11:50 PM
Umm… do you know anything bout Mormonism or are you just spouting pc feel good stuff? Cuz the Christ of the Judeo Christian Bible and the Christ of the Mormon bible are not the same person. An honest Mormon will tell you that… oh and everything Phil stated is accurate…
CCRWM on September 2, 2010 at 12:00 AM
Chris Matthews is REALLY having a hard time dealing with the 8/28 rally, isn’t he?
Harpazo on September 2, 2010 at 12:05 AM
Yeah, I just moved to Charleston, SC last week (from Raleigh, NC). Earl will do nothing here, but Gaston is the oone we’ll need to worry about here in Charleston. Stay safe up there!
SouthernGent on September 2, 2010 at 12:05 AM
If you know people who won’t vote Republican because of some comments made at HotAir, they weren’t going to vote for Republicans anyway. And why are their beliefs any more valid than those who comment here? But it is lovely for you to swoop in and tell everyone to shut up. We appreciate it.
Cindy Munford on September 2, 2010 at 12:44 AM
Are you always in Va Beach?
Cindy Munford on September 2, 2010 at 12:45 AM
Congratulations on the move. I know your heart has always been in S.C..
Cindy Munford on September 2, 2010 at 12:49 AM
Exactly!
Glenn Beck isn’t promoting Mormonism, Christianity, Buddism or Judaism. He’s telling people to return to God and make religion a bigger part of their life.
In essence, Beck is telling people to believe in God and to go back to Church…whatever Church that happens to be for them.
I can imagine the look on an anti-Mormon Pastor’s face when one of his inactive members of his congregation comes back to Church. The Pastor will ask “why did you come back to the Church?”
The response: “Glen Beck.”
The idea of a Mormon telling people to go back to their synagogue, chapel, church, temple, or meeting house of their faith may blow people’s minds…but that’s what Beck is doing.
Conservative Samizdat on September 2, 2010 at 1:09 AM
An honest Mormon will tell you that the Jesus mentioned in the Bible and that is mentioned in the Book of Mormon is the same guy.
You know…the Jesus that was born in Bethlehem, healed the sick, raised the dead, preached the gosepl, died on the cross and was resurrected three days later.
Conservative Samizdat on September 2, 2010 at 1:12 AM
I sure hope so.
tballard on September 2, 2010 at 1:36 AM
An honest Mormon would also acknowledge that Jesus and Satan were brothers. When Elohin (God the father) suggested a savior for the Earth, Jesus and Satan both volunteered. When Jesus was chosen, Satan rebelled and went to Earth with his group of followers. Those who followed Jesus became white people, those who followed Satan became black Africans, and those who were neutral became the brown-skinned American Indians.
Once again, not campatible with Christianity. Nor do Christians believe that the American continent was filled with giant cities founded by white-skinned Indians (who were really Jews) who were eventually killed off by the brown-skinned Indians. Nor do Christians believe that the Garden of Eden was in Missouri.
Phildorex on September 2, 2010 at 2:08 AM
From teaching students in a fairly conservative high school, I can say that there’s a growing libertarian feeling in the youth of America. The kids increasingly don’t care about this issue. And if they do, it’s a distant concern in favor of them or their parents getting a job, college, starting a family, etc. It may not be supported now, but eventually, perhaps sooner than we think, it will be a non-issue except to the older demographics.
kc-anathema on September 2, 2010 at 2:51 AM
That is true. It sounds weird or unchristian until you understand what they mean when Mormons express that belief.
I’ve been a member of the LDS Church my whole life and I’ve been an LDS Missionary and a Sunday School teacher for 6 years. I’ve never heard or seen this taught.
That might be true. However, there are many disagreements among Christians on various points of doctrine and yet they’re still considered Christians.
For example, some Christians don’t think Catholics are not Christians. Some Christians don’t believe that Jehovah’s Witnesses aren’t Christians either. Some don’t believe that Seventh Day Adventist are Christians.
However, if you were to ask Catholics, Mormons, Seventh Day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses or any other group that claims to be Christian, they will tell you they believe in the Jesus that was born in Bethlehem, healed the sick, raised the dead, preached the gosepl, died on the cross and was resurrected three days later.
And guess what…Catholics, Mormons, Seventh Day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses and other Church who profess a belief in Christ are Christians. End of issue.
Conservative Samizdat on September 2, 2010 at 3:06 AM
That is true. It sounds weird or unchristian until you understand what they mean when Mormons express that belief.
I’ve been a member of the LDS Church my whole life and I’ve been an LDS Missionary and a Sunday School teacher for 6 years. I’ve never heard or seen this taught.
That might be true. However, there are many disagreements among Christians on various points of doctrine and yet they’re still considered Christians.
For example, some Christians don’t think Catholics are Christians. Some Christians don’t believe that Jehovah’s Witnesses are Christians either. Some don’t believe that Seventh Day Adventist are Christians.
However, if you were to ask Catholics, Mormons, Seventh Day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses or any other group that claims to be Christian, they will tell you they believe in the Jesus that was born in Bethlehem, healed the sick, raised the dead, preached the gosepl, died on the cross and was resurrected three days later.
And guess what…Catholics, Mormons, Seventh Day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses and other Church who profess a belief in Christ are Christians.
End of issue.
Conservative Samizdat on September 2, 2010 at 3:08 AM
Two consenting adults of the same sex have the right to commit themselves to a loving, monogamous relationship in this country today.
No one is preventing this from happening, or hunting them down and sending them to “cure the queer” camps.
I don’t care what people want to do in their own lives, it is none of my business, more power to you if it makes you a happy, productive citizen.
What I am opposed to, and will fight against, is the Militant Gay Rights Activist Community.
These people are not just after the ability to live as they wish in peace.
They are after the redefinition of American Culture as it has been understood for generations into something entirely different and new.
Two consenting adults of the same sex can do whatever they want to do, but they do not have the right to force the entire country to concede that their relationship is a “marriage” by judicial fiat.
This is what they are after, a political and cultural victory for themselves, and over traditional Americans.
I am speaking of the Activist Militants, a relatively small group of people who have a big megaphone right now.
This agenda is also being pushed into the public school system, where it has no place whatsoever.
The State does not have a right to arbitrarily engage in Social Engineering to counter the values taught by parents so that a political agenda can have an easier path in the next generation.
If you state the position I have, that marriage is one man+one woman and nothing else, it does not mean you fear or hate gay people.
It means exactly what I said it means, and nothing more.
Same sex unions, co-operative uni-sex civil arrangement, civil living relationship circumstances, call it any number of things that would be an accurate description.
These things are not, however, a marriage.
That is One Man+One Woman, period. Nothing else qualifies.
That is not to say that alternative family structures are inherently illegitimate from a strictly secular point of view, or that people shouldn’t have the same privileges as a married couple in a hospital or inheritance situation.
Those entirely reasonable, practical goals of equality are not good enough for the Militant Gay Rights Activist Community.
They want the word “marriage”. Anything less than that, and you hear words like sexual apartheid, 21st century Jim Crow, separate but equal.
What they want to achieve is cultural acceptance of the notion that a marriage is any number of family arrangements, the limit of which seems to be very flexible over time.
Seeking to preserve the definition of marriage as we have known it, is not anti-gay. It is a response to an all out assault on the traditional culture by a movement of Militant Gay Rights Activists who also just happen to be extreme leftists on any number of other fronts, whose activists for those issues also just happen to want to tear down the traditional nation and replace it with something else themselves.
Brian1972 on September 2, 2010 at 3:12 AM
They would also tell me Jesus was both the Son of God AND God. That there is and only ever has been ONE God. Would a Mormon say that?
Rocks on September 2, 2010 at 3:28 AM
Well, let’s take a look at your own holy book:
Here is a quote from Joseph Fielding Smith, former president of the Mormon Church (their equivalent of the pope) and nephew of founder Joseph Smith:
Phildorex on September 2, 2010 at 3:38 AM
Some Christians believe in the trinitarian view of the Godhead. Others believe in the non-trinitarian view of the Godhead. Others have a unitarian view and some have a binitarian view.
Despite the theological differences, they’re usually considered to be Christian Churches.
Conservative Samizdat on September 2, 2010 at 3:42 AM
Some Christians believe in the trinitarian view of the Godhead. Others believe in the non-trinitarian view of the Godhead. Others have a unitarian view and some have a binitarian view.
Despite the theological differences, they’re usually considered to be Christian Churches.
Conservative Samizdat on September 2, 2010 at 3:43 AM
If we decide now that social issues will divide us, the sinister trolls wielding their wedges will succeed.
Perhaps we should consider politics to be about small government, free markets and fiscal responsibility, and see those as unifying themes to defeat the secular progressive marxist assault on our freedom?
davecatbone on September 2, 2010 at 4:30 AM
Cuda and Beck should have a rally every month.
The MSNBC staff would be forced to get the mental health treatment they so desperately need.
IlikedAUH2O on September 2, 2010 at 4:41 AM
Yep
darwin on September 2, 2010 at 6:35 AM
Chris has sort of gone off the deep end, even from where he starts (which is floundering stupidity). He’s in genuine trouble as a person, and not just as a bad political commentator. It’s a meltdown.
Jaibones on September 2, 2010 at 6:59 AM
Jehovah’s witnesses, like mormons, are not considered christians by other christian churches. thats the end of the issue. until the mormons embrace the trinity, and traditional christian doctrine, as the worldwide church of God did, you can say you are christian until the cows come home, but the rest of christianity will not buy it.
no they’re not.
right4life on September 2, 2010 at 7:31 AM
As far as I know, the only people that the Catholic Church will acknowledge as Christians are those that can recite the Creed. That Creed begins in Latin ‘Credo in unum Deum’, and in English ‘I believe in one God’. I’m sure you can find the entire creed. (Either Nicene or Apostles’ will do.)
Among other things, this means that no Church which does not believe in a Trinitarian God can be called Christian by Catholics. (It violates the passage ‘one in being with the Father’, referring to Jesus Christ.)
As far as I am aware, the main issue with Mormons, from a Catholic perspective, is that they view the Fall very differently than we do. I was told by a Mormon (and I certainly can believe that his understanding of his theology was not complete) that the Fall was necessary in God’s salvific plan. Since the Fall involved sin, this cannot be accepted by a Catholic. And since all that Jesus did on Earth was also part of God’s salvific plan, I cannot agree (based on the above) that Mormons and Catholics can view Jesus’ ministry on Earth in the same way.
Now, on subject for this thread…
I’m conservative.
I’m gay. (I don’t practice.)
I’m Catholic.
I don’t support gay marriage qua marriage.
I would prefer to see the state get out of the ‘marriage’ business altogether.
I will say, though, that even as a Catholic, I would prefer an Objectivist ‘state’ to one run by so-called Liberals like we have in Government today.
Scott H on September 2, 2010 at 7:44 AM
With all due respect, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Good Lt on September 2, 2010 at 7:44 AM
uh yeah right…have you ever read that site? please…
libertarians are pro-abortion pro gay marriage….they’re not conservative.
right4life on September 2, 2010 at 7:52 AM
right4life: I think it’s fairer to say that the Libertarian Party platform is pro-abortion. If a Libertarian both understands the philosophy of their party (which many more do than for other parties, in my experience), and he will admit to the humanity of the unborn child, the Libertarian is almost always pro-life.
Certainly, Libertarians are not Conservatives. If they were, they would be called Conservatives, would they not? I would not say that they are, therefore, Liberals.
Scott H on September 2, 2010 at 7:58 AM
I remember reading that site when the iraq war was going on…they sure sounded the same as the democratic underground or the huffington post…
right4life on September 2, 2010 at 8:13 AM
The truth that you are an obnoxious rube doesn’t hurt me a bit.
Umm…enough to know that you are an obnoxious asshhole.
Blake on September 2, 2010 at 8:19 AM
you’re a jackass.
no surprise since you don’t have the intellect to discuss anything.
let me guess you’re a demoKKKrat!
right4life on September 2, 2010 at 8:26 AM
AP, before I read further,is this thread about Matthews or Palin?
oldernwiser on September 2, 2010 at 8:42 AM
I will just tell people to look up Catholocism with the Muslims, because that is how you do it. I bet you go to a Ford dealer to ask about Toyota too.
So let me put it this way to you. I as a Latter day saint Recognize some good in Catholocism. There is also a great deal of false and leftover paganism. but hey. I don’t say you aren’t Christian. I leave that for Jesus Christ to actually declare.
Noelie on September 2, 2010 at 8:48 AM
I knew I liked you, it where I am from. I am heading there mid-month & I hope to meet conservative pilgrim who is in the area also.
Cindy Munford on September 2, 2010 at 8:51 AM
Nope, Blake is not a Democrat.
Cindy Munford on September 2, 2010 at 8:51 AM
You got the VB vibe? Right now we’re hoping hurricane Earl doesn’t come any closer. Isabell did mega-damage. We were without power for four days on that one. This time I’m more prepared with a generator and other things.
darwin on September 2, 2010 at 8:58 AM
Atlas Shrugged will be the best boring book you’ve ever read. Worth the tedium.
ynot4tony2 on September 2, 2010 at 9:06 AM
The GOP may one day support gay “marriage” but anyone who believes the words of the Bible will never support it. Regarding the religious mini-debate: Christians worship the Creator period (see commandment #1). Other religions worship created things.
Mojave Mark on September 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM
I don’t read that site, nor do I care what somebody says on a website. He/she/it does not speak for all libertarians any more than Pat Robertson speaks for all conservatives.
Libertarians are anti-government-in-your-bedroom and anti-government-in-your-personal-medical-decisions.
That’s not liberal. It’s consistent with small government philosophy. You can’t criticize big government for spending too much, for being ineffective and for being over intrusive, and then try to use the government to expand into areas of private life to enforce your chosen social morays when you get control. If you’re being consistent in your belief that the government is the problem.
That’s called a contradiction.
Good Lt on September 2, 2010 at 9:35 AM
Mormons are nice people. Call them and 2 clean cut young men on bicycles will hand deliver a King James Bible and Book of Mormon to you. One is worth reading and keeping.
seven on September 2, 2010 at 9:40 AM
Homosexuality is still a disease. as a paraphilia, it most often is co morbid wiith other mental illnesses. It is a recipe for dysfunctional homes. In the bible the word is bastard. All new kids in a gay married home are bastards.
Removing the mental illness label from it means insurance coverage for their gay counseling is no longer covered.
seven on September 2, 2010 at 9:43 AM
We still own my mom’s house over by the Amphib Base. It always seems like there is a hurricane coming just as school is about to start. When conservative pilgrim & I get our plans together we will let you know when & where in case you might like to join us? No pressure.
Cindy Munford on September 2, 2010 at 9:46 AM
LOL! Interesting sales pitch. I found the book amongst my dad’s collection and still haven’t taken the plunge.
Cindy Munford on September 2, 2010 at 9:47 AM
Sounds good.
darwin on September 2, 2010 at 9:50 AM
Mr. Matthews and his like are running out of derogatory epitaphs for the actions the right use in response to the barrage of hate, the leftists use to disparage the positive actions the right offer to solve the problems created by the left.
MSGTAS on September 2, 2010 at 10:11 AM
The better question is this: When will MSNBC sober up and get rid of that jabbering idiot?
kens on September 2, 2010 at 10:59 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »