Obama: The people at Beck’s rally are filled with anxiety

posted at 12:23 pm on August 30, 2010 by Allahpundit

Seven minutes with The One on Glenn Beck’s rally, the Ground Zero mosque, and the endless conspiracizing about his faith and birthplace. (Wisely, he passed on Carville’s advice on what to say about that last subject.) Something for everyone here. For Birthers, agony when Williams declines to press him on the location of the holy grail, a.k.a. his long-form birth certificate. For mosque supporters/opponents, confusion when he suggests that he supports Park51 being built where it is (since we’d let a church or synagogue be built there), then hedges once again by emphasizing that he’s not endorsing any particular project. And for political junkies, shock when a question about Glenn Beck’s religious rally on the Mall leads him to repeat his single biggest mistake of the 2008 campaign. Here’s the money quote, which comes at the very end of the clip. Isn’t this his infamous bitter/clinger theory of small-town values voters dressed up in slightly more politic language?

I — I do think that it’s important for us to recognize that right now, the country’s going through a very difficult time, as a consequence of years of neglect in a whole range of areas. Our schools not working the way they need to, so we’ve slipped in terms of the number of college graduates, you know?

A financial system that was not, you know, operating in a way that maintained integrity and assured that the people who were investing or who were buying a home or were using a credit card weren’t getting in some way cheated. We had a health care system that was broken and that was bankrupting families and businesses. All those issues are big, tough, difficult issues. And those are just our domestic issues. That’s before we get to policy issues in two wars. And a continuing battle against terrorists who want to do us harm.

So, given all those anxieties — and given the fact that, you know, in none of these situations are you going to be fix things overnight. It’s not surprising that somebody like a Mr. Beck is able to stir up a certain portion of the country. That’s been true throughout our history. What I’m focused on is making sure that the decisions we’re making now are going to be be not good for the nightly news. Not good even necessarily for the next election. But are good for the next generation. And I’m very confident that those decisions are the ones that we’ve made.

He says he didn’t watch the rally so he may be under the impression that it was a three-hour “the socialists are coming!” Obama bash-fest. Not so; Weigel is closer to the mark in describing it as “the world’s largest megachurch.” I don’t know what The One was thinking, but dismissing what ended up being a big revival meeting as a byproduct of economic anxiety is not the way to ingratiate oneself with religious voters. And I’m not sure how to take the bit about America producing fewer college grads than it used to. Is he suggesting that that’s one of the things Beck’s audience is worried about? Or is he suggesting that it’s because they themselves are ill-educated that they follow Beck at all?

Update: I changed the headline to emphasize his comments about the rally instead of the Birther thing, which is actually tangential to the post.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Sad but true. :(

tigerlily on August 30, 2010 at 8:09 PM

But what’s Great whoever we miss in 2010 we can knock off in 2012 ;)

That’s what’s great about American elections we get to vote a lot, and in President Obama’s own words, Elections have consequences. You Bet They Do Champ! GRIN.

Dr Evil on August 30, 2010 at 8:15 PM

Liberals are always projecting. Always

Caststeel on August 30, 2010 at 8:39 PM

I see Equivapundit has now adopted the left/media hive’s re-branding of the Ground Zero Victory Mosque as the innocuous, cosmopolitan sounding “Park51″.

Dr. Carlo Lombardi on August 30, 2010 at 8:45 PM

Hey, the groups that protested against Bush were all Communist inspired and that’s a proven fact – but did he ever attack the motives of those who protested against him?

Nope – Bush just said “Hey that’s Democracy – and they have a right to express their opinions.”

But “Naw, Naw, Naw, Naw Naw” … not the “classless one” – he has to attack the motivations of those who don’t agree with him.

Another reason to get rid of this clown in ’12 and his party in ’10.

HondaV65 on August 30, 2010 at 9:10 PM

contempt of the governed

AshleyTKing on August 30, 2010 at 9:28 PM

As for Birthers, I hold them in less contempt, but only slightly. I know they think they’re only doing what they believe is right for the country, but that doesn’t make what they believe “right.” It just makes them either unwilling or unable to accept facts that don’t paint Obama as a Muslim-Hitler-Devil-Kenyan-Foreign-Userper or whatever, and that’s profoundly stupid and unhelpful.

If people renounce it, I’m all for bringing them into the fold. If not, lots of luck. You’ll get no quarter here.

Good Lt on August 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM

Call me a constutionalist rather than “birther”, but it is there in plain English for all to read that the president must be a natural born citizen of the United States and it does not provide any exceptions. With that on the table of evidence, I don’t just think I am right, I am right!

Of course I am not right if I am wrong that he does not have a true born in the USA birth certificate or certification of live birht to prove he is eligilable. There in lies the problem. Obama refuses to show that he is elligable by the confines of our Constitution. The absence of proof does not confer elligablity on him, rather to the contrary it establishes the inelliagbility for the office.

Obama of course claims he has proven his birth as being in Hawaii with a low resolution scanned jpeg of the certification of live birth. He has not made the hard copy available to be examined.

Posting a jpeg is not proof, especially not in this age of photoshop expertes. The low res just added to the fire since it makes the appearance of forgery when examined at the pixil level. To that effect there has not been any proof provided that this is even a real copy of his CLB.

At the time of Obama’s birth, Hawaii was still a young state dealing with the fact that many of its citizens were not born in hospitals and did not have birth certificates. They resolved this issue by allowing its state citizens to ask for a CLB to use as a birth certificate. The process allowed many parents of children not born in the Untied States to obtain a CLB. On its face today, as in the one posted by Obama’s campaign, it is no different from one issued by the hospital, with the exception that on the “long form” which shows the place of birth would show a country other than the United States.

I have not doubt that Obama has a CLB and that it confers on him citizenship by the fact that he has one. The question is it natrualized or natural born, or perhaps illegal if you consider that her age is in question.

The answer to the question of his birth in Hawaii or Kenya is the main concern with me and those who go off on the deep end of this question. The answer is on the long form, the part that showes either the hospital and doctor of birth or the country where the child was born. Being born in Kenya would not have been a concern for his mother since she was a US citizen and probably believed that he child would by right also be one. It is as likely the clerk had the same belief or was willing to over look the fact. Putting Kenya in as the place of birth would not have changed the citizenship question at the time and it did not create any diffictulty with creating a CLB four days after his birth.

At the time of Obama’s birth Hawaii was still a young state. It had a large number of citizens who were not born in a hospital or had a record of birth. They resolved this problem by allowing people to apply for a certification of live birth that would function as a birth certificate when needed. The problem is that it also allowed parents of children not born in the United States to apply for a CLB. This again served as a birth certifcate where needed, but it also had the effect of allowing those children to become defacto natuaralised citizens.

In that light, yes Obama is a naturalized citizen, but not natural born, which is the difference between be eligible and not being eligible.

By the laws of British citizenship, Obama’s father was a British citizen and so were all his children until the age of 18. At 18 they had to apply to retain it or it reverted to Kenyan citizenship. This adds a unique consideration into the eligiblity question, but only if he was born in Kenya. It would convey on him dual citizenship and effectively make him ineligable. What if he never knew that and made no effort to affirm it, would he still be ineliaglbe? A legal technicality, but one complicated by the fact that he travels to Kenya, campaigned there for his murderous cousin. This is further complicated by his refusal to show his passport. Granted he has that right, but curriosly the pages of his mothers passport that were relevent to the period of time have disapeared.

There is the dual citizenshio with Micronesia question. In that country during the time obama was there, only Indonesian citizens could go to school. It is not hard to see his step father declaring that he is his son and Indoneisan. Can the action of a parent change the citizenship of a child is a question to condsider in this situation. It becomes complicated when his mother had him removed from her passport when he was seven. She apprently even attempted to give him an Indoniesian ser name. He still had to have a passport to travel in and out of that country, until he began living with his grandparents. That brings up the question of his having an Indoniesan passport, confirming by the hold oof one as being a citizen of that country. The question of the child is envolked them put into question by the apprent use of that passport by Obama when he was an adult.

Rectifying the Indoneisan citizenship his parents confered onto him would not have been a problem. He would have simply needed to reconfirm his citizenship to become a naturalized citizen. But that again is the problem, it is not the constitutionally mandated natrual born citizenship. It would have also meant giving up the Indonesian citizenship and passport since they do not recongnize dual citizenship. Obvioously Obama found that passport useful to travel to Pakistan when it was closed to US citizens. It is also the reason that his college records are of interest, though he probably would not want his grades shown either.

The question is about being constitutional qualified and it happens to begin with his question of birth and goes from there the broarder question of citizenship.

The question is can we afford to expose him now in the best interest of our country while he is still in office. The effect would be to undo everything he has done, which on the surface would be positive for out country but country, but the consquences that result might be just as destructive. Our only hope seems to be that he will be a one term president and may be tempered by a congress that has been given a new mandate of the people. Obama himself will be the one that determines the one term, of which he is already hinting will be his choice. He is a narcissist and as such he can not survive failure, at least failure that he has to own. Not running again also may solve the question of his eligibility without undoing everthing from the dog potty schedule to Healthcare.

Franklyn on August 30, 2010 at 9:34 PM

I’m sorry, Mr. President, you jerkoff.

Jaibones on August 30, 2010 at 9:43 PM

given the fact that, you know, in none of these situations are you going to be fix things overnight

Yes We Can! A little less time on golf/vacation/party fundraising; a lot more time on the economy. Oh, and it helps when, you promise to “pivot to JOBS” in January, you begin the pivot prior to September..

TN Mom on August 30, 2010 at 9:47 PM

Dr Evil on August 30, 2010 at 8:15 PM

Let’s hope the November turnout is so overwhelming that the usual ACORN and SEIU electoral fraud and theft, which has now been financed with BILLIONS of OUR dollars via the “stimulus” won’t make a difference.

It’a a little freaky to realize that the President of the United States was only a few short years ago the Director of Project Vote, an organization dedicated to stealing elections. Is there NOTHING and is there NO ONE attached even tangentially to obama that is not completely corrupt? And what does that make obama, King of Corruption?
No need to answer these and other rhetorical questions. ;)

tigerlily on August 30, 2010 at 10:25 PM

As a senior I am filled with anxiety. From the Sunday Times in England:

By Lucy Johnston, health editor
A HOSPITAL where hundreds of neglected patients died is facing calls for a change in management after the Sunday Express found that it is still providing a poor standard of care.
Stafford Hospital was at the centre of a national scandal last year when it was revealed that up to 1,200 patients had died of neglect and poor care between 2004 and 2007.
Now the Sunday Express has uncovered evidence that neglect is still going on – in some cases causing the deaths of patients, according to their families.

Dhuka on August 30, 2010 at 10:30 PM

As for Birthers, I hold them in less contempt, but only slightly. I know they think they’re only doing what they believe is right for the country, but that doesn’t make what they believe “right.” It just makes them either unwilling or unable to accept facts that don’t paint Obama as a Muslim-Hitler-Devil-Kenyan-Foreign-Userper or whatever, and that’s profoundly stupid and unhelpful.

If people renounce it, I’m all for bringing them into the fold. If not, lots of luck. You’ll get no quarter here.

Good Lt on August 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM

The fact that you demonstrate complete ignorance of basic Constitutional principles, don’t know the difference between natural born and naturalization, nor the basic elemental facts of the entire obama documents blackout/sealing via executive order issue; that you call names and base your argument on straw men and putting-words-in-other’s-mouths, are just a few of the reasons that you have absolutely eliminated yourself from the discussion at the adults’ table.

You are welcome to remain at at the childrens’ table, however, and maybe the kiddies will even get a little scared if you threaten them with that “no quarter” bluster.

tigerlily on August 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM

But, even more importantly, does Barry agree with the Iranian State media that Carla Bruni, France’s First Lady, is a whore?

He has an opinion on everything.

Especially things he knows nothing about.

Illuminate us, O Lightbringer!

profitsbeard on August 31, 2010 at 12:45 AM

The mutual corruption of the Democrats and the media on display:

This President says he ignored several hundred thousand people protesting in the nation’s capital, and the media shrugs its shoulders.

The last President expressed reluctance to engage with one woman camping in a ditch while he fought a war, and the media told us about what a disgrace it was for weeks on end.

November 2 won’t be so easy to ignore, either of you.

drunyan8315 on August 31, 2010 at 8:36 AM

I watched the rally online.

Those people might have been filled with something, but it was not anxiety.

What a petulant buffoon this guy has turned out to be.

Embarrassing.

Dorvillian on August 31, 2010 at 8:56 AM

The mutual corruption of the Democrats and the media on display:

This President says he ignored several hundred thousand people protesting in the nation’s capital, and the media shrugs its shoulders.
drunyan8315 on August 31, 2010 at 8:36 AM

Obama is a corporatist, who owns most the media outlets that carry his water? Corporations. They are going down together, and it couldn’t happen to a better group of “Jaded” uninspiring, mediocre, vastly becoming irrelevant people.

When was the last time anyone heard a Democrat running for office mention “American Prosperity” I haven’t heard one because they don’t believe in American Property, these people are busy “sacking” the country not building it up.

It’s not incompetence – it’s intentional.

Dr Evil on August 31, 2010 at 9:46 AM

Americans.. As seen through the eyes of our Liberal/Bettors.

franksalterego on August 31, 2010 at 9:52 AM

If Obama gets desperate for support toward 2012, something tells me that birth certificate is going to come out. And probably on the front page of the NY Times.

JavelinaBomb on August 30, 2010 at 1:00 PM

Too late. It’s already been gasped that the original birth certificate was “destroyed” but then, after that, Linda Lingle claims she’s seen the original — Lingle conveniently avoided sharing just what it said, though.

Obama’s half-sister, born in Indonesia, has the same document that Obama does, from the state of Hawaii. An interesting factoid.

Lourdes on August 31, 2010 at 10:12 AM

However, I don’t get the pejorative, “Birthers.”

It serves no purpose except to identify those using the term as weird. I mean by that, it’s a significant issue, not a single issue or some “only” concern, politically, but an important one among many others.

Clearly, Obama uses the issue of his absent Birth Certificate to agitate the public. Which does not mean, however, that he isn’t hiding in plain site, that the issue isn’t important. It’s an issue. It’s important. There are other issues. They’re important.

We should be able to walk and talk at the same time but for some who *I* regard as “fringe” among the Right, they’re intolerant to a point of madness about the issue and Obama is enjoying agitating that bunch.

I’ve made my questions known about Obama’s highly debatable identity many times and the questions remain unanswered. He’s never resolved any of them, having sealed his entire identifying documents from public access, including:

– Birth Certificate (“missing,” then “lost”, then, “on file,” then…);

– Academic Records (did he attend U.S. schools claiming to be a foreign student, and receive financial aid as a foreign student — which would document him having committed fraud, if so — or, why refuse public access to his academic records — grades miserably poor, countering his professed personna as being “smart” and “genius” and whatnot);

– Adoption Records (his identity was legally changed in the adoption by Lolo Soetoro, but why prevent public access to these records, what’s a problem there); and,

– Passport Records (so much to speculate here as to why he’d seal those records, too little time and space to list the speculations at this time).

Obama has made numerous — NUMEROUS — public statements about “himself” that have been disproven under scrutiny. He has several Social Security numbers from what I’ve read, one of them on record as being issued to some fellow who lived a century ago or something like that…

…I think he’s created a fictional personna he calls Barack Obama and he’s compromised by his real story, so documents that reveal who he actually is — however subtle the variations — put his current public personna to the test and he fails the credibility aspect of a man of worth and integrity. So he’s sealed everything and spent a great deal of the taxpayers’ money (first, campaign money, later the taxpayers’ money) to keep his documents out of the public’s access.

It’s not about being or not being “a Birther,” nor about his birth certificate solely or as single issue. It’s about a man who APPEARS to have literally “made up” a person, then emulated that fictional personna and now is committed to it. So he can’t handle the embarrassment of public discovery of just who he actually is.

I’m not referring to name here, but to the life story of someone who he just may have created as fiction and then assumed as use, and now it’s a story he has to make work by this principle: tell one lie, it’s then necessary to tell many other lies to buoy the first lie, and to tell the truth at any point in the chain compromises the teller’s personna.

Eventually, some day, the public will know more about the truth of who this guy is. I doubt it’ll happen while he’s in the Presidency.

I would like to see, however, the Right stop knocking people who ask probing questions about “Barack Hussein Obama”‘s identity and life story as “Birthers.”

P.S.: I don’t ascribe to “conspiracy theories” that speculate about any alternative story to the fact that Muslim terrorists flew hijacked planes into the Twin Towers, into the Pentagon and attempted into the White House (probable) on 09/11/01. So assuming that “Birthers” equates with “Truthers” is an ugly, irrational, mean assumption.

The terms are slurs. The Right should effort to stop using the terms.

Lourdes on August 31, 2010 at 10:27 AM

Yeah, I’m a little anxious about the crap the current administration, with the help of Congress, is pushing!

GFW on August 31, 2010 at 10:33 AM

And since Red State’s rant about “Birthers,” I stopped visiting and/or reading the site, certainly have stopped linking to it. The site lost credibility with me when that rant happened, place looked infantile at that point.

Obama uses the issue to agitate people. Isn’t that obvious by now? But the thing is, it does not address the issue just because he’s agitating people by use of the issue. D’oh.

ONE THING ABOUT THIS INTERVIEW, though:

Obama was asked about the fact that “some Americans” don’t think he’s Christian (I don’t, by his own statements he proves he isn’t) and that he is Muslim.

To that statement, Obama responded with his junior-delinquent snark about his forehead (“can’t plaster my birth certificate to my forehead”).

What does his birth certificate have to do with his religion? Or what people have concluded about what his religion is?

Obama’s Freudian Slip…

The guy’s not so smart after all. He’s just unkind, cruel and mean. His immature snark there was utterly disrespectful of the American people and of the Office of the Presidency. He seems to enjoy disparaging both — which is why I describe him as “mean”. Mean, like a weak little guy who hates his father because his father won’t buy him a red Farrari.

Lourdes on August 31, 2010 at 10:34 AM

Obama is a corporatist, who owns most the media outlets that carry his water? Corporations. They are going down together, and it couldn’t happen to a better group of “Jaded” uninspiring, mediocre, vastly becoming irrelevant people.

When was the last time anyone heard a Democrat running for office mention “American Prosperity” I haven’t heard one because they don’t believe in American Property, these people are busy “sacking” the country not building it up.

It’s not incompetence – it’s intentional.

Dr Evil on August 31, 2010 at 9:46 AM

With the huge loss of income due to plummeting patronage in their products, media groups NEED public doles to stay functional, and thus the rather desperate lock-hold on and with Obama’s Administration and the man himself.

These media corporations can’t be answering to their stockholders financially because clearly they’re persisting in manufacturing products that consumers reject and continue to reject (severe loss of viewers, readers, patrons of their sites and channels — their products).

So it’s some mad=process at work, wherein government is forced to be expanded because Obama’s keyed-in with corporations who need taxpayer resources. They’re not going to drop Obama due to his failed/failing Presidency because they need the hook of him in Office.

It seems to be the explanation as to why Obama continues to opt for whatever the American public by majority DON’T want — that is, whatever we oppose by high majority, he seeks. It’s corporatism, yes, but it’s also madness that counters entirely the process of Capitalism.

Lourdes on August 31, 2010 at 10:39 AM

Schadenfreude on August 30, 2010 at 1:48 PM

No, Obama is neither agnostist, nor what you think of as a liberal Utopianist. Go to any liberal arts graduate school in America, and you’ll find hundreds of Reids and Pelosis, and dozens of Barak Hussien Obamas. They are all stamped out of plastic, but from two COMPLETELY different molds.

Barack Hussein Obama is a Black Liberation Theologist. He spent his entire adult life, not sitting in a back pew putting in face time as the official story goes, but advancing to the highest innermost sanctum of that church. And you don’t do that without being a True Believer.

logis on August 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM

Obama does not believe that Jesus Christ is his Savior, the Only Son of God. To the contrary, he declares that his “salvation” is reliant upon “collective salvation” whatevertheheck that even means (it’s not a Christian belief, not even barely a Christian belief he’s professing there, in fact, it’s “counter” to Christianity what he’s claiming).

He declares that his “work” is aided and helped by Christianity, that it’s a process that rewards HIM as to his egotistical goals and wants and therein is Christ’s usefulness to Obama, as a tool, which he also disregards as Savior (just explained, previous paragraph).

He claims there are “many paths to salvation” which is also a statement/belief that is contrary to Christianity. As it is also a belief in something Christ very specifically contradicted and did so numerous times in numerous statements.

Obama likes the assistance his career — him, his ego — gets by using Christ. But he’s not a Christian.

I was reading an interview with him from 2008 in which he clearly claims he doesn’t pray often, does not “get on (his) knees,” doesn’t have time, etc., to pray, then today we’re hearing from the White House that he prays “all the time” or whatever. Obviously, Christianity as catch-phrase is very useful to Obama but it’s not because he has any personal relationship as Salvation with Jesus Christ, he just finds the sales pitch (“I’m a Christian”) useful to his own humanistic vanity.

Lourdes on August 31, 2010 at 10:48 AM

And, back to the issue of Obama’s wonky responses/statements from this interview, he repeated “the facts are the facts” twice in a matter of a few minutes, yet he never defined any facts.

It’s an evasive phrase he’s using to avoid actually saying anything.

Lourdes on August 31, 2010 at 10:50 AM

well DUH. Yep. I’m filled with anxiety all right. But it ain’t because I’m crazy. It’s because we got a socialist baby tyrant in the White House.

Mad Mad Monica on August 31, 2010 at 11:07 AM

Lourdes on August 31, 2010 at 10:39 AM

Frank Luntz was on Imus in the Morning – this morning hawking GM telling the two folks sitting in for Imus that it’s patriotic to buy GM and disparaging Toyota…..Does he think because it is Fox Business News no one will notice that he is hawking a product on a Fox affiliate? Does he think Imus or Neil Cavuto don’t notice what he’s doing? Is Frank Luntz invested in Government Motors? He was going on about why Americans should take a look at the new superior GM product…uh huh thanks Frank but I already paid for those GM products a couple of times now.

I would really like to know who is zooming who in the corporate world?

http://video.foxbusiness.com/#/v/4325550/frank-luntz-on-economy-politics/?playlist_id=87057

Dr Evil on August 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM

This is the video, Connell McShane ask Frank Luntz are you being paid to say that? I have no interest in buying a GM product now or in the future. Ford that’s a whole different story. It would be so patriotic of us to buy the autos from the Company we bailed out and skrewed us over…maybe Frank Luntz wants to see if anyone is paying attention?

Pushing GM and disparaging Toyota.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/#/v/4325545/buy-american-cars-to-boost-economy/?playlist_id=87057

Dr Evil on August 31, 2010 at 11:42 AM

Someone out community-organized the One and it’s killing him. Beck didn’t achieve it through some threat of accusations of racism, thuggary, or working a system of back handed deals but in through a true grassroots movement and ho-bama is pissed off at that! How dare anyone, especially some whining, white, conservative who the ho’bama media has failed to demonize or trivialize successfully steal the One game plan…only in this instance, it wasn’t a game, it was too real. Even his media is now crapping thinking “my God, we have to cover this, expose our own bias, and now we are the demons”.

PatriotPete on August 31, 2010 at 12:14 PM

Obama: Do I need to paste my birth certificate to my forehead or something?

Cute, like his smart-alec defense of his non-reaction to the oil spill: What do you expect, I can’t suck it up with a straw.

petefrt on August 30, 2010 at 12:28 PM

Real presidential don’t you think?

wi farmgirl on August 31, 2010 at 12:37 PM

I was at the “Restoring Honor Rally” and I think I can speak with some real clarity on this issue. No Pres. Obama the issues that you listed do not cause me undue anxiety. What does cause me anxiety is you spending us into oblivion by taking Trillions of non existent money and passing it to your Union and Liberal causes/buddies, or that you are turning against good honest people like Jan Brewer and not “just” ignoring our current laws, but actively fighting against them in our liberal corrupt circus called the US court system. Its also because you have federalised student loans, health care, mortgages, credit card payment and the list keeps increasing. Because all of your campaign promises were lies and no one has held your feet to the fire for this. I could keep going on, but I think you get the point.

SGinNC on August 31, 2010 at 2:43 PM

Lourdes on August 31, 2010 at 10:48 AM

Well said.
You pretty much summed up the house-of-cards faith that belongs to this POTUS.
So revealing.

Badger40 on August 31, 2010 at 3:06 PM

I see Equivapundit has now adopted the left/media hive’s re-branding of the Ground Zero Victory Mosque as the innocuous, cosmopolitan sounding “Park51″.

Dr. Carlo Lombardi on August 30, 2010 at 8:45 PM

It’s a sign of the changes HA has gone through since cutting ties with Michelle.
It’s a reason HARP was created.

Badger40 on August 31, 2010 at 3:08 PM

well DUH. Yep. I’m filled with anxiety all right. But it ain’t because I’m crazy. It’s because we got a socialist baby tyrant in the White House.

Mad Mad Monica on August 31, 2010 at 11:07 AM

That was my first thought at the (new) headline.
It’s like if someone held a gun to your face while stringing up dynamite sticks to your family and then holding you in contempt because you’re a little nervous.

DrAllecon on August 31, 2010 at 4:14 PM

Obama is full of more crap than a fattened holiday turkey. He is without a doubt the most shallow and clueless dolt I’ve ever seen.

rplat on August 31, 2010 at 5:51 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4