Obamateurism of the Day

posted at 8:05 am on August 16, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Even amateur politicians should know this: if you’re going to take a public position on a controversial topic, either take it or don’t.  Don’t take the position one day and then claim you didn’t a day later.  Barack Obama decided to use a Ramadan speech to take a position on the Ground Zero mosque on Friday, and by Saturday, even his own staff was disowning it:

President Barack Obama’s decision to make public comments Friday that further stoked an already-brewing controversy over the construction of a mosque near Ground Zero was “purely” his own, an administration official said Saturday.

And then, Obama started backpedaling:

Obama clarifies slightly on NY mosque comments. “Wasn’t commenting on wisdom…of putting a mosque there” just “the right” to do so

The official story was that there was nothing inconsistent about Obama’s blasting critics of the GZ mosque and then declaring that he wouldn’t endorse the “wisdom” of the project. And then he tried to pull back the pullback:

But most mosque opponents concede the Muslim group’s legal right to place the mosque in the planned site. They just argue that it’s a terrible idea and have appealed to the organizers to cancel the project. At the iftar dinner, Obama cast his vote with the mosque builders. And then he pulled back.

And then he had his spokesman pull back the pullback. “Just to be clear, the president is not backing off in any way from the comments he made last night,” the White House’s Bill Burton said Saturday. “It is not his role as president to pass judgment on every local project. But it is his responsibility to stand up for the Constitutional principle of religious freedom and equal treatment for all Americans. What he said last night, and reaffirmed today, is that if a church, a synagogue or a Hindu temple can be built on a site, you simply cannot deny that right to those who want to build a mosque.”

Now, there is simply no doubt that Obama’s Friday evening speech, in the context in which it was delivered, was an endorsement of the Ground Zero project. It was certainly widely understood as such. The headlines of the three New York papers reporting the speech were: “Obama Backs Islam Center Near 9/11 Site” (New York Times); “Allah Right By Me” (New York Post); and “Prez: Build the Mosque” (New York Daily News). The lead of an Associated Press report on the speech was: “President Barack Obama on Friday forcefully endorsed building a mosque near ground zero, saying the country’s founding principles demanded no less.” But on Saturday, Obama said all those listeners were wrong, that they misunderstood him.

Several years ago, there was a word for Obama’s rhetorical technique: Clintonian.

Ben Smith at Politico didn’t buy it at all:

Obama’s new stance is logically consistent with his words last night, if a bit less “clarion,” as Mike Bloomberg called the first remarks. And there are certainly two possible stances here: Bloomberg’s, that the Cordoba project itself represents the best of America; and Obama’s, that the freedom of religion is an important American value.

Obama’s new remarks, literally speaking, re-open the question of which side he’s on. Most of the mosque’s foes recognize the legal right to build, and have asked the builders to reconsider.

But the clarification is, in political terms, puzzing [sic]. The signal Obama sent with his rhetoric last night wasn’t that he had chosen to make a trivial, legal point about the First Amendment. He chose to make headlines in support of the mosque project, and he won’t be able to walk them back now with this sprinkling of doubt. All he’ll do is frustrate some of the people who so eagerly welcomed his words yesterday as a return to form.

It’s a return to amateurish stumbling, which Obama hasn’t left at all, but this time it was on a high-profile, emotional issue that no one is going to overlook.

Got an Obamateurism of the Day? If you see a foul-up by Barack Obama, e-mail it to me at obamaisms@edmorrissey.com with the quote and the link to the Obamateurism. I’ll post the best Obamateurisms on a daily basis, depending on how many I receive. Include a link to your blog, and I’ll give some link love as well. And unlike Slate, I promise to end the feature when Barack Obama leaves office.

Illustrations by Chris Muir of Day by Day. Be sure to read the adventures of Sam, Zed, Damon, and Jan every day! Chris has started his annual fund drive, so be sure to visit the DBD site and keep DBD in action!

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

So…know-it-almost-all, then?

James on August 16, 2010 at 9:47 AM

Trust me, I’m a walking comedy of errors — probably could almost qualify to be Vice President.

mr.blacksheep on August 16, 2010 at 10:03 AM

Barry was for it, before he was against it.

GarandFan on August 16, 2010 at 10:20 AM

It’s BHO’s MO to flip-flop. I compiled a list of 33 “backpedals” that occurred just during the presidential campaign.
http://jgapinoy.blogspot.com/2008/07/barack-and-forth.html

jgapinoy on August 16, 2010 at 10:24 AM

But it is his responsibility to stand up for the Constitutional principle of religious freedom and equal treatment for all Americans.

Really? What about all those gender and racial preferences in the “Health Care” bill? Dittos for “Financial Services reform”. The Democrat Party agenda is all about the unequal treatment of Americans through preferences to so-called “under-represented groups”.

Buy Danish on August 16, 2010 at 10:38 AM

I have no problem with this.
Why?
Well, when we find out that the imams have multiple wives and may actually abuse their children we can expect Hilary to call in the FBI to invade the site, blast it with fire breathing tanks and then bulldoze it into the dirt. She may need Janet Reno to help her though.

OkieDoc on August 16, 2010 at 10:44 AM

Present

DDT on August 16, 2010 at 10:45 AM

Can I just finish this be the waffle?

ya2daup on August 16, 2010 at 10:47 AM

Is this one of those times the current POTUS has thrown himself under the bus?

apostic on August 16, 2010 at 8:18 AM

Could be; after all, he is a suicidal bumbler.

ya2daup on August 16, 2010 at 10:52 AM

Another “I Love Lucy” moment. Maybe we should term them “I Love Barack” moments.

mr.blacksheep on August 16, 2010 at 11:01 AM

Another “I Love Lucy” moment. Maybe we should term them “I Love Barack” moments.

mr.blacksheep on August 16, 2010 at 11:01 AM

Barack, you got some splainin’ to do.

NeighborhoodCatLady on August 16, 2010 at 11:06 AM

See, this is the thing about liberals and progressives – if it’s legal it is morally right. And since when did liberals/progressives like Obama get their shorts in a twist about private property rights? They are neo-Marxists and do not believe in private property rights. But this fits Obama’s Muslim agenda.

abcurtis on August 16, 2010 at 11:17 AM

But it is his responsibility to stand up for the Constitutional principle of religious freedom and equal treatment for all Americans.

It’s his responsibility but not his inclination.

abcurtis on August 16, 2010 at 11:29 AM

No surprise, once again Obowma acted stupidly…..

dthorny on August 16, 2010 at 11:31 AM

BREAKING: Ku Klux Klan buys land adjacent to Martin Luther King center in Atlanta; plans to build “cultural and educational center” there

“If Democrats would not allow a Ku Klux Klan monument to be built next to the Martin Luther King Center, then why are they allowing this Victory Mosque to be built by Islam over the graves of so many Americans who were murdered by Muslims on 9/11/01?”

mrt721 on August 16, 2010 at 12:02 PM

“pull back the pull back”

The images this conjures…the stupidity and malice of this admin. can never be surpassed…for shame to the nation, forever.

Schadenfreude on August 16, 2010 at 12:12 PM

The right w/b wise to just sit back and let them implode.

Schadenfreude on August 16, 2010 at 12:12 PM

Obama nationalized the hot issue and it will not go away by Nov., and not until the mosque will be, or not be, built, and long thereafter. Couldn’t happen to a bigger dummy.

Obama’s new remarks, literally speaking, re-open the question of which side he’s on. Most of the mosque’s foes recognize the legal right to build, and have asked the builders to reconsider.

It depends on what the word “side” means. This guy surpasses Clintonian. Let him.

Schadenfreude on August 16, 2010 at 12:18 PM

When I read O or hear him talk I think of a High School Student Body President. That’s about the level of this guy’s discourse.

Mojave Mark on August 16, 2010 at 12:18 PM

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE – A White House spokesman says politics wasn’t a factor in President Barack Obama’s remarks about building a mosque near the site of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in New York City.

Deputy White House press secretary Bill Burton said it was “not politics” but Obama’s feeling that he had the obligation as president to “make sure people are treated equally” under the Constitution.

Obama has said that religious freedom allows the mosque to be built, but without commenting on the wisdom of building one two blocks from ground zero. Republicans have pounded him for his comments, making it a prime midterm election issue.

Burton said Obama “felt it was his obligation as president to address this.” Obama was on the way to Wisconsin for fundraising.

Sure, none of what they do is “political“.

Schadenfreude on August 16, 2010 at 12:26 PM

The only thing that can top this for OOTD is for zero to declare Ramadan a national holiday before Friday nite.

dragondrop on August 16, 2010 at 12:45 PM

He WILL stand with his muslim brothers. Anyone need anymore evidence of this, if you have doubts?

Obama = what you get when you take the “useful” out of useful idiot!

capejasmine on August 16, 2010 at 1:04 PM

The only thing that can top this for OOTD is for zero to declare Ramadan a national holiday before Friday nite.

dragondrop on August 16, 2010 at 12:45 PM

Islamic holidays are already being bantered around, so your prophetic comment will most likely come true!

capejasmine on August 16, 2010 at 1:05 PM

Islamic holidays are already being bantered around, so your prophetic comment will most likely come true!

capejasmine on August 16, 2010 at 1:05 PM

That would mean that he would declare national holidays to appease a little more than 1 % of America’s population.

kingsjester on August 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM

Have you noticed that those on the far-left who publicly demonize Christianity are the same ones now demanding that the Ground Zero mosque be built based on America’s Christian values, like turning the other cheek and treating others as you would want them to treat you?

OxyCon on August 16, 2010 at 1:14 PM

Even the Flying Spaghetti religion would have the right to build

True, but it would be far less offensive than a Mosque. No one from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti murdered 3,000 Americans across the street just 9 years ago.

katablog.com on August 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM

Comment pages: 1 2