Video: Louisiana going after casket-making monks?

posted at 3:00 pm on August 15, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

For more than a century, the brothers at Saint Joseph Abbey in St. Benedict, Louisiana, have supported themselves through the making of simple caskets, but that way of life is now under attack.  The state of Louisiana has taken the abbey and its leaders to court for violating laws that require caskets to be sold through licensed funeral homes, and the monks could face large fines and even jail time for offering its simplicity to consumers.  The Institute for Justice has taken up their cause and have a new video introducing the case:

Under Louisiana law, it is a crime for anyone but a licensed funeral director to sell “funeral merchandise,” which includes caskets. To sell caskets legally, the monks would have to abandon their calling for one full year to apprentice at a licensed funeral home, learn unnecessary skills and take a funeral industry test. They would also have to convert their monastery into a “funeral establishment” by, among other things, installing equipment for embalming human remains.

On August 12, 2010, the Institute for Justice teamed up with the monks of Saint Joseph Abbey to file a federal constitutional lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana to vindicate their right to earn an honest living. In a time of 10 percent unemployment and widespread economic pessimism, this case raises one of today’s most important constitutional questions: May the government restrict economic liberty just to enrich a group of politically favored insiders such as licensed funeral directors?

Licensing laws are necessary in some limited applications, but they mainly serve to protect the largest players in a market from start-up competition. Once the licensing laws pass, those with a steady and significant income flow and existing capital equipment have little overhead to maintain licensing.  Those who lack the means to pay for capital equipment and the time for long-term time commitments to unproductive tasks cannot compete with the industry establishment.

Here is the test one should apply.  Does anyone think that the abbey’s caskets would be significantly improved by purchasing embalming equipment?  Will a year studying funeral home processes and procedures make simple pine boxes any more reliable than they are now?  If the answer is no to these questions — and no one is complaining, apparently, about the abbey’s products — then the licensing requirement is nothing more than protectionism for a cabal of funeral homes that prefer to keep consumers locked into products with high markup in their own parlors.

Louisiana voters should demand change in the state’s licensing laws to allow the monks and others to sell caskets while ensuring that funeral homes perform other services properly.  Government restrictions on private enterprise should do no more than protect consumers from actual fraud while allowing the greatest amount of competition and market entry possible.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The monks should just call the caskets “tiny mosques,” then all will be forgiven. Mosque building is all the rage after all.

Weight of Glory on August 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM

You too can spend eternity in this Cordoba House.

Inanemergencydial on August 15, 2010 at 3:06 PM

Louisiana voters should demand change in the state’s licensing laws to allow the monks and others to sell caskets while ensuring that funeral homes perform other services properly. Government restrictions on private enterprise should do no more than protect consumers from actual fraud while allowing the greatest amount of competition and market entry possible.

So, what does Jindal think about this? What about other conservatives in Louisiana?

MeatHeadinCA on August 15, 2010 at 3:07 PM

Another example of oppressive Big government?

Fake8 on August 15, 2010 at 3:07 PM

Crooked politicians and the lobbyists run the state. Here in VA a similar law banning the sale of VA grown wine except through a distributor. Now many of the little guy’s cannot afford to pay for distribution so they only sell out of their own wineries. I see several may go out of business because of it. REVOLT!!

faol on August 15, 2010 at 3:08 PM

I’d also be disappointed if the outcome is essentially everyone needs a license except for those that are clerics.

MeatHeadinCA on August 15, 2010 at 3:08 PM

weight of glory
exactly

rob verdi on August 15, 2010 at 3:10 PM

However, it also is Louisiana law that if a family brings a casket to the funeral home, they must use it if the body is not too large for it.

Therefore, under Louisiana Law, the monks can sell these directly to individuals, just not via funeral homes.

They have been making and selling these to individuals for years.

Kermit on August 15, 2010 at 3:11 PM

May the government restrict economic liberty just to enrich a group of politically favored insiders

Of course, they seem to be doing it all the time. Sad to say it. The bigger the government gets the more people who have more time to enforce more rgulations.

At least these good monks are in a more conservative court district.

Heaven help us.

PalmettoPatriot on August 15, 2010 at 3:13 PM

Just to point something out. Progressive Democrats support the rights of illegal aliens to find a job (in fact, anyone that doesn’t agree with this is EVIL); however, I bet these same people support this same regulation of the Casket Business… priorities.

MeatHeadinCA on August 15, 2010 at 3:15 PM

California, Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire Restrict the Most Jobs
Hair braider, fortune teller, florist and interior designer are some of the jobs for which states require licenses
August 24, 2007

Los Angeles (August 24, 2007) – Do you want to be a fortune teller in Maryland? Your future better include a license from the state. How about being a hair braider in Mississippi? You’ll need 300 to 1,500 hours of training and government permission. Want to sell flowers in Louisiana? Only licensed florists can do that. And almost every state requires certification if you want to move furniture and hang art while calling yourself an interior designer.

In California, there are a total of 177 different jobs that require a special license or credential, the most in the country, according to a new Reason Foundation study examining occupational licensing trends.

Northeastern states aren’t much better. Connecticut, Maine and New Hampshire all require job seekers to obtain a license before performing more than 130 jobs. In stark contrast, you can do most of those very same jobs – without a license – in Missouri, where just 41 careers require certification.

Ranking the States on Occupational Licensing
States (Number of jobs requiring a license)

1. California (177) 26. Virginia (89)
……
25. South Dakota (90) 50. Missouri (41)

“Most of these licensing requirements are completely arbitrary,” said Adam B. Summers, a policy analyst at Reason Foundation and author of the report. “You see that clearly when examining neighboring states. California has 177 job categories licensed. But if you take one step across the state line into Arizona just 72 careers are licensed. In North Carolina you need a license to do 107 jobs. Next door in South Carolina, only 60 jobs require certification.”

Proponents claim these licensing requirements are needed to protect the public from unscrupulous, incompetent, or dangerous practitioners. However, numerous studies show these laws actually reduce consumer protection and public safety, according to the Reason Foundation report.

“These laws are created under the guise of ‘helping’ consumers,” Summers said. “In reality, the laws are helping existing businesses keep out competition, restricting consumer choice, destroying entrepreneurship, and driving up prices.”

A summary of the study is available at http://www.reason.org/ps361polsum.pdf.

Reason.org

Also enable the government to collect licensing fees.

Wethal on August 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM

Does this law apply if they sell these caskets out of State?

Patricksp on August 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM

Seems like there was a post here on HotAir about Walmart wanting to sell economical caskets online. What a great way for the Monks and Walmart to combine forces, fight the bureaucrats and provide a product most of will need.

fourdeucer on August 15, 2010 at 3:18 PM

Seems like there was a post here on HotAir about Walmart wanting to sell economical caskets online. What a great way for the Monks and Walmart to combine forces, fight the bureaucrats and provide a product most of will need.

fourdeucer on August 15, 2010 at 3:18 PM

What are you talking about? Clearly, the gov’t should buy poor, dead people caskets … after they overdose on gubmint cheese!!!!

MeatHeadinCA on August 15, 2010 at 3:20 PM

Here is their website

Patricksp on August 15, 2010 at 3:20 PM

The large Death Industry long ago promised not to have sex with your loved ones dead bodies in exchange for a monopoly on the T-shirt, casket and grave digger franchises.

BL@KBIRD on August 15, 2010 at 3:21 PM

http://saintjosephabbey.com/

Patricksp on August 15, 2010 at 3:21 PM

There’s gotta be an easy loophole here…sell the “caskets” as “replicas”…for entertainment or display purposes. Perhaps a Halloween prop or storage box. What the consumer does with it is another story.

With the extra publicity alone these monks should increase their sales.

JetBoy on August 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM

When I called Arizona last year to inquire about an architect’s license…. I got the following message: “if you are calling about a meth lab abatement license press 1, All other licenses, press 2.”

oceansidecon on August 15, 2010 at 3:26 PM

Maybe the monks can change their trade to making wooden containers for cremated remains. No embalming requirement necessary.

OR they should yell “religious discrimination”. The Amish and Muslims are not required to be on the new Obama health care plan. There must be some way to get around this ridiculous requirement due to some religious reason.

manateespirit on August 15, 2010 at 3:30 PM

Is there a funeral director union? If so, you know the Dem’s will back up the effort to squelch this enterprise.
Good idea to hire an Undocumented Democrat or two to keep the bureaucrats at bay.

Maybe the monks should start giving a large box away to anyone who makes a donation over a certain amount to the Order. ETV is always sending mugs & stuff for their cash campaigns. What’s the difference? I’m just saying.

If someone in La. wanted to craft their own casket, would the funeral directors squawk about using it? Wait, maybe that is a rhetorical question.

People of La. need to switch to cremation & have ashes scattered to cut some coins out of the funeral directors’ pockets if the monks are forced to stop. *g*.

PalmettoPatriot on August 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM

Isn’t an ignorant and strong government great? But we need to be sure not to endanger the dead. So I understand./

CWforFreedom on August 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM

I can at least see the argument that the people who embalm or cremate human remains have certain standards to protect the public from possible health issues if they don’t do their job right. But I fail to see how the public safety is in any way improved by requiring caskets to be sold by people who have a permission slip from the government.

The Monster on August 15, 2010 at 3:35 PM

Anyone know how the monks got started doing this if it’s illegal? I realize it’s Louisiana, wink wink, but I guess I’d like to see a timeline of when the law was adopted and what the monks were doing before and after that. My presumption is in their favor, but what gives here?

I do applaud Ed for calling for due process. Change the law, don’t just ignore it because the people it affects are noble and cuddly.

J.E. Dyer on August 15, 2010 at 3:39 PM

Wethal on August 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM

Amazing! In Mississippi you can become a police officer with the power of life & death over people with just 9 weeks (360 hours)of training, but you need up to 1,000 hours to braid hair!

Trafalgar on August 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM

Ah, the hell with the government. Sell them as beds with a canopy. What the owner does with it is nobody’s concern but the buyer’s.

And now that I think of it, They ought to introduce custom doubles and triples. Granted there is a much smaller market for these but it would probably represent a significant savings for the economy minded that have to deal with more significant tragedies.

Dusty on August 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM

PalmettoPatriot on August 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM

I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts that the funeral directors own the cremation business to the same degree as the casket business. 360 degree stranglehold. Monopoly with gov’t assist.

ConstantSorrow on August 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM

There is big money in death. And every state makes a bundle off of the death of it’s citizens.

ButterflyDragon on August 15, 2010 at 3:45 PM

Leave them alone. It’s the only wood they’ll get to handle!

SouthernGent on August 15, 2010 at 3:49 PM

Did you even notice the nice jewelry funeral directors’ families have?

IlikedAUH2O on August 15, 2010 at 3:52 PM

OT but Gallup shows Obama’s popularity at lowest ever: 42%

http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx

CWforFreedom on August 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM

If the answer is no to these questions — and no one is complaining, apparently, about the abbey’s products…

You’re a funny man, Ed.

trigon on August 15, 2010 at 4:02 PM

Licensing laws are necessary in some limited applications, but they mainly serve to protect the largest players in a market from start-up competition.

Licensing is a win-win-win for the authoritarians.

Stealing Dreams, Creating Nightmares

Many a story I have heard about the authoritarians destroying the dreams of the less fortunate as they try to make a better life for themselves. There’s the story of homeless man in California who dreamed of getting an apartment by shining shoes. After he obtained a shoe shining kit he decided to provide a service to others rather than beg in order to make a living. He was just about to make his dream come true, he had nearly saved enough to remove himself from the homeless lists, when the government stepped in and turned his dream into a nightmare. They had found out about his industriousness and they wanted their share in the form of a $400 small business registration fee, or license, or some such thing.

Then there’s a story out of South Carolina about a business which provided a service where girls who were particularly proficient at a practice known as “African hair styling” were paid to braid customers’ hair at the request of the customer. These girls were harming no one, had no complaints from clients, and were providing a valuable service, yet the government deigned it necessary to crush their dreams when it decided they had to be licensed to braid hair. They even went as far as creating a nightmare by fighting the business in their (stacked against the public) court where it was decided these girls either had to pay up and become licensed or quit braiding hair and earning money.

From shutting down bars for allowing smoking to harassing delivery men for bringing biscuits to your home, there is no shortage of stories of over reaching government changing the dreams of hard working folk into nightmarish scenarios. Most of these licensing and regulation stories have nothing to do with keeping the public safe and everything to do with legalized extortion. Mostly they prove that the laws and regulations put in place are not there so much to protect the people as they are to keep the poor from improving their lot in life and prevent competition from challenging the already wealthy and established businesses in the community. It’s a protection scheme designed to keep the rich and powerful safe and the poor dependent on them for work.

Rae on August 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM

You need to be licensed to build a hinged box?

Really?

James on August 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM

Wonder if Obama will comment on this. Hmmm they are Christians. Nahhhh

CWforFreedom on August 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM

Maybe if they joined the La. Carpenters and Joiners Union, provided union wages, health care and pension plans their problem would go away.

fourdeucer on August 15, 2010 at 4:14 PM

Speaking of building and the dead…

profitsbeard on August 15, 2010 at 4:19 PM

Yeah, we’re all pretty disgusted by it.

LickyLicky on August 15, 2010 at 4:25 PM

The Founding Fathers must be turning over in their wooden caskets made by local carpenters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on August 15, 2010 at 4:31 PM

There are a handful of cases where there’s a legitimate interest in licensing people where their profession can be a true danger to the public – handling toxic materials in public, biological contaminants, etc.

Mind you, it doesn’t appear from the historical record that such a system works, just that there’s a legitimate interest – most of the people involved appear to be incompetent to determine fitness or corrupt – look at the AMA’s history as the white-coated equivalent of union thugs looking for kickbacks.

Most of these things are just protection rackets. Hair braiding? Did you know they actually license (or at least did until recently, there was a court case I didn’t hear the result of) WRITERS in Los Angeles? Bill of Rights, what’s that?

Knew a DA once that ran off a group of local contractors complaining about unlicensed competition, said “I’m not going to waste extremely valuable court time prosecuting someone for trying to make a living fixing fences.”

When even The Law won’t enforce the law, you may have a problem with your laws. That was in California, Land of Licenses and Restrictions, BTW.

California was once the Golden State, but it turns out that all that glitters is not gold.

Merovign on August 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM

You need to be licensed to build a hinged box?

Really?

James on August 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM

If it’s not study enough, it could collapse in on you and…. Nevermind.

RBMN on August 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM

The Founding Fathers must be turning over in their wooden caskets made by local carpenters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on August 15, 2010 at 4:31 PM

And I’ll bet those carpenters were *unlicensed*! The horror! The horror!

Merovign on August 15, 2010 at 4:33 PM

I’m watching some of Stossel‘s stuff right now… highly recommend.

New Threats to Freedom???

MeatHeadinCA on August 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM

New Threats to Freedom???

MeatHeadinCA on August 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM

Same old threats – the grabbers like to recycle.

Merovign on August 15, 2010 at 4:40 PM

Licensing laws are necessary in some limited applications, but they mainly serve to protect the largest players in a market from start-up competition.

They also encourage price-fixing. Caskets are phenomenally overpriced, but no one can come into the market offering lower prices because the licensors (who just happen to be their potential competition) won’t allow them in. The ones who suffer most from this are, of course, the poor who would profit from having the option of purchasing a cheaper casket.

29Victor on August 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM

God Speed, Monks.

Now about your doctrines….

Tim Burton on August 15, 2010 at 4:54 PM

This is the best use of Louisiana’s resources, while its economy is swirling down the toilet, to be harrassing taxpaying businesses.

GTR640 on August 15, 2010 at 5:04 PM

If you want to see the price of a casket drop, tell the funeral home you are getting it on-line. Good for a smile during a stressful time.

Cindy Munford on August 15, 2010 at 5:06 PM

I’d also be disappointed if the outcome is essentially everyone needs a license except for those that are clerics. MeatHeadinCA on August 15, 2010 at 3:08 PM

They could be grandfathered in.

A specific exception could be made for religious reasons. Why not? Churches e.g. are often exempt from laws.

And why should funeral parlors have a monopoly on the sale of funereal accoutrements? Sounds like someone has a good lobbyist.

Akzed on August 15, 2010 at 5:42 PM

God Speed, Monks.
Now about your doctrines….
Tim Burton on August 15, 2010 at 4:54 PM

???

I would bet that their worship service is older than yours, and therefore closer to the apostles’. Just a guess.

Akzed on August 15, 2010 at 5:43 PM

I would bet that their worship service is older than yours, and therefore closer to the apostles’. Just a guess.

Akzed on August 15, 2010 at 5:43 PM

Here’s where I would quote Pope and Councils and doctrines and decrees from centuries ago… only to be chastised for quoting things from “before the lightbulb was invented” and told “that was 500 years ago, we don’t teach that anymore!” etc…

Can’t win.

As for the monks… on a political level I support their cause… but from an historical standpoint, the irony is tasty.

mankai on August 15, 2010 at 5:54 PM

Crooked politicians and the lobbyists run the state. Here in VA a similar law banning the sale of VA grown wine except through a distributor. Now many of the little guy’s cannot afford to pay for distribution so they only sell out of their own wineries. I see several may go out of business because of it. REVOLT!!

faol on August 15, 2010 at 3:08 PM

Blanco passed the exact same law in Louisiana.

darclon on August 15, 2010 at 6:04 PM

When do the people say they have had enough of the regulations?

tarpon on August 15, 2010 at 6:10 PM

These are the kinds of stories the GOP needs to combine and package within short video presentations and ads. Day in and day out. This is how the conservative “message” is evangelized. Hard-hitting, easy-to-produce, real-world messages. They should offer contests to young conservative filmmakers to make spots like this (call it “Life under Liberals” or some such thing) and saturate Youtube.

What an opportunity.

Forget it. The fatheads in the GOP “braintrust” haven’t a clue.

rrpjr on August 15, 2010 at 6:11 PM

I would bet that their worship service is older than yours, and therefore closer to the apostles’. Just a guess.

Akzed on August 15, 2010 at 5:43 PM

Actually, most their doctrine comes from 4th or 5th Gen on the Eucharist. Either way, it violates Reason (2nd Law), therefore should result in interpretation not being literal.

Assumption of Mary, was declared heretical by the Church, then in the 19th Century was declared Canon by the Church. Who is right? Scripture doesn’t say.

Immaculate Conception, has the problem of an infinite regress. If Christ required Mary to be sinless, because Christ would have inherited her sin, then Mary would have required her mother to be sinless otherwise she would have inherited her mothers sin. If Mary could be born without sin, though her mother could be sinful, then Christ could be born sinless without Mary being sinful, therefore Mary being sinless is either 1) an infinite regress, 2) not required. This isn’t to mention it wasn’t even Canon until 1854.

Also, it takes less exegesis to accept that Romans 3:23 “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” includes Mary, than to exclude Mary from sin using Genesis 3:15 and Revelation 12.

Tim Burton on August 15, 2010 at 6:38 PM

Here’s where I would quote Pope and Councils and doctrines and decrees from centuries ago… only to be chastised for quoting things from “before the lightbulb was invented” and told “that was 500 years ago, we don’t teach that anymore!” etc…

Can’t win.

As for the monks… on a political level I support their cause… but from an historical standpoint, the irony is tasty.

mankai on August 15, 2010 at 5:54 PM

See above, but he is arguing the Fallacy of Age.

Notice I appealed to Reason and Scripture.

Tim Burton on August 15, 2010 at 6:40 PM

These are the kinds of stories the GOP needs to combine and package within short video presentations and ads. Day in and day out. This is how the conservative “message” is evangelized. Hard-hitting, easy-to-produce, real-world messages. They should offer contests to young conservative filmmakers to make spots like this (call it “Life under Liberals” or some such thing) and saturate Youtube.

What an opportunity.

Forget it. The fatheads in the GOP “braintrust” haven’t a clue.

rrpjr on August 15, 2010 at 6:11 PM

Yup, you need to show something appalling and then say, “Go to X site to see the rest of it.” Kinda like how viral marketing and such work.

Tim Burton on August 15, 2010 at 6:41 PM

For those who think getting a union involved, there are basically only three effective unions in Louisiana.

1. SEIU for hotel employees in New Orleans.
2. IBEW (electricians) which has made a lot of concessions to stay viable.
3. USW which has taken over PACE which included the onetime OCAW and this covers most of the refinery workers and it too has had to make lots of concessions to stay viable.

Other than that there really isn’t any union presence in Louisiana since it became a “Right to Work” state in the late 70′s.

Kermit on August 15, 2010 at 6:43 PM

For a state that divideds itself into parishes -isn’t it aa bit hypocritical to go after monks?

Perhaps they just don’t want to deal with the idea of death -it’s so middle ages, you know.

Don L on August 15, 2010 at 6:44 PM

My small business is suffering from the same type of regulatory stranglehold. Our small career school competes with publicly funded community colleges but because we are “for profit” we are automatically assumed to be evil con-men trying to steal students’ money. Our registration fees and bond requirements went from a few hundred dollars a few years ago to over $11,000 this year. Other government agencies who teach EMT and paramedic classes like we do are exempt from all of the costs and consumer protection requirements we have to meet.
Our education is regulated from the number of students per instructor to the minimum number of hours and who qualifies as an instructor because we apparently can’t be trusted to choose good teachers. New accreditation requirements have cost us about $100,000 in cash and staff time and will be a continuing burden, even though our pass rate exceeds Harvard.
The irony is that since we can’t pass on all of the additional costs to the student (since the competition is subsidized) I have to turn to chasing federal contracts to stay in business. It’s such fun to be forced to be dependent on the government!

spudmom on August 15, 2010 at 7:01 PM

Tim Burton on August 15, 2010 at 6:38 PM

The irony is that most of the function of the current church dates back only decades.

mankai on August 15, 2010 at 7:05 PM

The funeral business, just like the wedding and baby business is a racket.

reshas1 on August 15, 2010 at 7:21 PM

When this is over in 2012 I can see the T-shirts: I survived the Obama Presidency.

Mojave Mark on August 15, 2010 at 7:32 PM

The Man keepin’ The Brothers down.

29Victor on August 15, 2010 at 8:45 PM

However, it also is Louisiana law that if a family brings a casket to the funeral home, they must use it if the body is not too large for it.
Therefore, under Louisiana Law, the monks can sell these directly to individuals, just not via funeral homes.
They have been making and selling these to individuals for years.
Kermit on August 15, 2010 at 3:11 PM

I don’t know about Louisiana, but there is an FTC rule from the early-mid ’90s which, among other things, says that funeral homes must accept caskets that families bring in from a third party.

For anyone who cares it’s called the funeral rule.

EconomicPirate on August 15, 2010 at 10:30 PM

I was watching Stossel the other day, and another Louisiana law was exposed regarding horrendous licensing requirements to – get this: Arrange Flowers.

Not only was there a rigorous written exam, but your floral arrangement samples had to be approved by a state panel made up of – your competitors.

What a joke. The good thing is that after the word got out – the law was repealed, essentially. There is a now just a simple written test.

Just another example of government teaming up with business with predictable outcome. But note the difference – things actually changed at the state level when this was exposed. There are more and more examples of that happening lately.

ck…

cktheman on August 15, 2010 at 11:27 PM

I dont know why some family funeral home doesn’t offer the monks an ‘outlet’ to sell them. I am sure that there is some taxes or other thing to be paid per casket but it would be still more affordable then the ‘normal’ ones.

Hell, the funeral home can skim $5 off the top of the sale. And probably still make a good amount of profit on them.

If the funeral home was smart, they would offer a ‘discount’ service fee for those purchasing the monks caskets, and dont do all the little things, but offer a place and a podium for the service. It wouldnt be that expensive and basically most of it would be profit.

B3 on August 15, 2010 at 11:32 PM

The monks should just call the caskets “tiny mosques,” then all will be forgiven. Mosque building is all the rage after all.

Weight of Glory on August 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM

You said it!!

Sherman1864 on August 16, 2010 at 12:29 AM

Licensure is such sh1t. I have an unlicensed cat-of-nine-tails for legislators who think licenses, certificates, permits, and the bureaus that dispense them are the solutions to problems of quality control. They are tools the well-connected use to put down competitors, and our ancestors worked hard to get rid of them.

Kralizec on August 16, 2010 at 2:04 AM

Isn’t it time the funeral home monopoly/oligopily power elites who control the econommics of grief have their power broken up? How much do they pay the politicians to leave them and their lucrative business (everybody uses their product)alone? Go though the process and you will be amazed at how much is required by law that is unecessary.

Don L on August 16, 2010 at 6:52 AM

Are the Brothers who sweep up the shop floor at the end of the day called the chip-monks?

FalseProfit on August 16, 2010 at 7:30 AM

Under Louisiana law, it is a crime for anyone but a licensed funeral director to sell “funeral merchandise,” which includes caskets.

One of the best examples of exchanging laws for bribes, you can find.

Take a hint, Bobby, if you want a national future.

MNHawk on August 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM

Tim Burton on August 15, 2010 at 6:38 PM

I said worship, not doctrines.

Akzed on August 16, 2010 at 11:32 AM

I said worship, not doctrines.

Akzed on August 16, 2010 at 11:32 AM

six of one…

Worship is based on doctrine.

mankai on August 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM

The monks at the St. Meinrad archabbey in St. Meinrad, Indiana (a bit northwest of Louisville, Ky.) make beautiful caskets — traditional-style as well as the simpler style that they use for themselves. Beautiful woods and wood stains, with a removable wooden cross in the lid that is a keepsake for the family.

You can see them at http://www.abbeycaskets.com. I hope the St. Benedict monks will get in touch with them, if they haven’t already, to see if a similar conflict has ever affected them.

KyMouse on August 16, 2010 at 3:16 PM

six of one…
Worship is based on doctrine.
mankai on August 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM

I guess so, if one believes the Church sprung fully armed from Meno Simon’s forehead.

Akzed on August 16, 2010 at 6:47 PM