California gets tough on illegal border crossings?

posted at 12:00 pm on August 15, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Looks like Arizona Fever may be sweeping California.  The state legislature will consider a proposal to make crossing borders a state crime punishable by six months in jail and a $1000 fine, a tough sentence for those just seeking access to the American dream.  State and local police agencies will have to enforce the law, which appears to fly in the face of announced boycotts of Arizona from California and several of its cities (including Los Angeles and West Hollywood) for doing essentially the same thing.

Except that the new law isn’t aimed at those who cross the federal border.  It’s aimed at those who cross the Hollywood elite’s barriers to crash parties:

A proposed law set to go before California’s Legislature this month would make one of Hollywood’s cherished utterances — “You’re not on the list” — carry grave new consequences. It’s a measure aimed at making the act of party crashing a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail, a $1,000 fine or both.

The author of the legislation, Assemblyman Anthony Portantino (D-La Canada Flintridge), said crashers at high-profile events like the Academy Awards and other awards shows pose a threat to public safety that warrants a law in addition to the 25 sections of trespassing code already on California’s books. Portantino acted at the request of theScreen Actors Guild after some crashers breached security at the SAG Awards in January but were released because of legal loopholes.

“At some awards shows, folks were there without a ticket or credentials; they were asked to leave, and they didn’t,” Portantino said. “The question was raised whether current trespassing laws were written in a way that covers that sort of situation. We’re trying to bring clarity to the whole issue so law enforcement knows how to and has the discretion to handle it.”

Hmmm.  Let’s try recasting that last quote from Portantino, a former filmmaker.  “At some workplaces, folks were there without citizenship or legal-resident credentials.  They’ve been asked to leave, and they haven’t.  Arizona is trying to bring clarity to the whole issue so law enforcement knows how to and has the discretion to handle it.”  Yeah, that works, doesn’t it?

The Academy seems to agree:

“Anything that enhances our ability to enforce our security procedures, generally speaking, we’re in favor of,” said Academy Awards spokesperson Leslie Unger. “We want to make the best use of whatever legal options are at our disposal. If this bill can expand them, all the better.”

Hey, isn’t that what Arizona is saying, too?  They want to enforce security procedures, and their populace is definitely in favor of that.  Why not expand Arizona’s legal options, too?  Or is border security only legitimate at Hollywood parties, where the limousine liberals who protest in favor of open borders now want law enforcement to police the red carpet? (h/t John from Venice)

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The message from the elite to the masses.”Stay in your place and out of mine”.

volsense on August 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM

If Joe and Bonnie throw a kegger and Muffy and Chad meander in uninvited, are they subject to the law?

Or is there a yearly income loophole so that if the host makes over $2M a year the law applies, but not if he makes $1.999M or less?

Akzed on August 15, 2010 at 12:08 PM

New state motto:
California, The Granola State*
*full of flakes, fruits, & nuts

jgapinoy on August 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM

Do as I say, Not as I do!

Dhurka Dhurka on August 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM

Make ‘em all have to reside on the Mexican border.

We’ll see how long it takes for that fence to go up.

listens2glenn on August 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM

Liberal = hypocrite. Look up in the dictionary.

ladyingray on August 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM

President Calderon, your presents is required at another joint meeting of Congress.

Electrongod on August 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM

Stop using logic! They hate that.

Cindy Munford on August 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM

Michaele and Tareq Salahi hardest hit.

Guardian on August 15, 2010 at 12:13 PM

Security for me, not for thee!

ThePrez on August 15, 2010 at 12:13 PM

Your credentials please?

tim c on August 15, 2010 at 12:14 PM

Did I spell that wrong? presence.

Electrongod on August 15, 2010 at 12:15 PM

Security for me but not for thee.

NeoKong on August 15, 2010 at 12:15 PM

Prop 187 tried to solve this in 1994.

Over-ruled by activist judiciary.

Too late, CA.

Waaaaaaaaay too late.

profitsbeard on August 15, 2010 at 12:15 PM

This further reinforces my belief that California is no longer a state, but rather a seperate dimensional realm of quasi-reality, one where the general laws and concepts of reasoning and common sense do not apply as they do anywhere else in the Universe.

pilamaye on August 15, 2010 at 12:17 PM

This state is hopeless and I live here, I need to move

Defector01 on August 15, 2010 at 12:18 PM

My conservative instincts say- if you’ve got a problem with gatecrashers, spend the money to hire more/better security.

Dunno all the details, but the story says they “were asked to leave” but didn’t. A competent security approach would have seen them safely beyond the perimeter and plugged the hole they snuck through.

cs89 on August 15, 2010 at 12:19 PM

Who are these “crashers”? I would think wanna-be actors, reality stars/publicity wh*res/ and the Code Pink types.

Marcus on August 15, 2010 at 12:19 PM

What? No “sanctuary cities”? (“Sanctuary” closets?)

Wethal on August 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM

Cleverly written headline and article, but I bet no one who lives in SoCal fell for it. Sadly, things are too far gone.

LASue on August 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM

The new NIMBY: Not In My High-Profile Event.

BuckeyeSam on August 15, 2010 at 12:29 PM

“You’re not on the list”

Isn`t this what Arizona is saying with their new law?

ThePrez on August 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM

Try this — throw a party for illegals and say it is invitation only. Issue no invitations and arrest everyone entering. Viola! illegal alien trap, and this time it’s (CA) legal.

GnuBreed on August 15, 2010 at 12:31 PM

Over a month and a half past due and still haven’t passed a state budget, as required BY LAW.

As with the Democrats in Congress, I get the feeling they know their asses are going to be thrown out this November, so why bother.

GarandFan on August 15, 2010 at 12:31 PM

Well, if our border is crossed at Arizona, all that happens is a few “little people” get killed

Whereas if a Hollywood award show gets breached, it might inconvenience slightly some crappy actor, some horrid singer, some gasbage director or some other astoundingly over paid and worthles entertainment mediocrity.

And we can’t have that, can we? We’re civilized here.

NoDonkey on August 15, 2010 at 12:34 PM

Nanny State Elitism has delivered its latest rule of stupidity….

DL13 on August 15, 2010 at 12:37 PM

LASue on August 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM

Agree.
Good article. Clever and well written.
A liberal reading it would stare vacantly, blink a couple of times and then move on.

justltl on August 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM

Breaking: The White House announced today that President Obama has signed an executive order directing national guard units and predator drone technology to Hollywood to bolster security at high-profile events.

BuckeyeSam on August 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM

California gets tough on illegal border crossings?

fixed that

gstep58 on August 15, 2010 at 12:43 PM

I would love to hear what the additional threat to public safety is, in addition to what is already covered by laws against trespassing.

That is priceless.

after some crashers breached security at the SAG Awards in January but were released because of legal loopholes

.

Yes, yes, I know these morons are hypocrites and utter morons. Still, it’s amazing how they keep reinforcing that notion. Let’s start a list of the top 25 100 500 SAGs who slithered through a legal loophole. Let’s start a list of the top 25 100 1,000 people supported by a SAG member who slipped through a legal loophole (or worse).

reaganaut on August 15, 2010 at 12:44 PM

I know these morons are hypocrites and utter morons.

Well that was weird. Guess I need another cup of coffee.

reaganaut on August 15, 2010 at 12:50 PM

First the federal government puts in the stupid buy a house for anyone sub-prime mess, then the fix which monotrs your bank cards, why no one knows. And now the federal government’s border program is so silly is worth crying over.

What is there in common … why that would be the federal government. And why do they do what they do — POWER.

tarpon on August 15, 2010 at 12:52 PM

reaganaut on August 15, 2010 at 12:50 PM

Welcome to the Department of Redundancy Department! I work there often myself. ;-)

Ed Morrissey on August 15, 2010 at 12:53 PM

Celebrities have stalker problems, and I can see them wanting to get stalkers away. But I do see the hypocrisy of liberal celebrities who don’t see the “little people” as being worthy of living securely

Sekhmet on August 15, 2010 at 12:55 PM

This sounds like a job for Andrew Breitbart or James O’Keefe. They should go round up a bunch of good looking young illegal aliens from South Central LA, pay them $50 each to crash some Hollywood parties and tell them to eat lots of food, drink expensive liquor, and make a lot of noise. If security tries to get rid of them, they should unfurl a Mexican flag and start chanting “racist gringos, this is our party, our land”. And of course, film the whole thing on a flip cam

ardenenoch on August 15, 2010 at 12:59 PM

Ed, how does your post and that link mesh??? Makes NO sense at all.

GoldenEagle4444 on August 15, 2010 at 1:00 PM

If I can sneak my wife into one of these events and she gives birth, is the baby automatically a movie star with all the rights and privileges that entails?

cirrus on August 15, 2010 at 1:00 PM

They aren’t party crashers. They are undocumented attendees.

They didn’t cross the velvet rope. The velvet rope crossed them!

JSchuler on August 15, 2010 at 1:02 PM

Anybody should be able to walk into any party or event they want. What’s all this crap about requiring people to show their invitations or tickets or “credentials” to get in? That’s obviously raaaaacist! California legislators are a bunch of fascists! Let’s boycott the state!

AZCoyote on August 15, 2010 at 1:08 PM

Modest proposal: Now that the citizens of that state know who the California Legislature actually works for, and it is clearly not the average Californian, perhaps they should consider selecting a completely new one at the next opportunity?

drunyan8315 on August 15, 2010 at 1:12 PM

Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, but just stand on the other side of the rope with all the other little people. Someone from the government will be by to help you when we party and spend more in an hour than you people make in a year.

tjexcite on August 15, 2010 at 1:14 PM

I could smell the hypocrisy a mile away.

ButterflyDragon on August 15, 2010 at 1:16 PM

Illegal aliens smuggling drugs and people are just fine…but crashing a party – *now* you’ve gone too far!

Paradox Drive on August 15, 2010 at 1:22 PM

The message from the elite to the masses.”Stay in your place and out of mine”.

volsense on August 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM

Exactly. Hollywood, hypocrisy is thy name.

They need to be forced to practice what they preach and let illegal party-goers in.

Tim Burton on August 15, 2010 at 1:25 PM

Illegal aliens to protest in the streets in 4… 3… 2….

Oh, wait!

Seven Percent Solution on August 15, 2010 at 1:33 PM

Reason #3 to never go to a movie.

SouthernGent on August 15, 2010 at 1:33 PM

This morning, I thought I was watching one of those talking head shows where the libs get their dialogue for the coming week.

Turns out, it was the movie “1984″.

BobMbx on August 15, 2010 at 1:37 PM

Illegal aliens smuggling drugs and people are just fine…but crashing a our party – *now* you’ve gone too far!

Paradox Drive on August 15, 2010 at 1:22 PM

FIFY

BobMbx on August 15, 2010 at 1:38 PM

I imagine this rank hypocrisy will be publicized by the NSM in no time!

Chip on August 15, 2010 at 1:56 PM

Vote here. It’s CBS. Propagate link to all you know.

Schadenfreude on August 15, 2010 at 2:00 PM

I know what to do, BOYCOTT MOVIES, not that I ever go with the choice of crap left wing movies. The last one I went to was the Mel Gibson mive ” The Passion of Christ” I rhink that was the name, hell to get old CRS.

I don’t think communism ever left Hollywood it just went underground, now with this Admin. it feels safe again,

Where is McCarthy when you need him.

Another beautiful day in sunny Arizona.

concernedsenior on August 15, 2010 at 2:09 PM

Undocumented partiers. Won’t someone stand up for their rights?!?!?!

gregbert on August 15, 2010 at 2:22 PM

Will they have to show their papers?

tgillian on August 15, 2010 at 2:23 PM

Where is McCarthy when you need him.

Concernedsenior on August 15, 2010 at 2:09 PM

Interestingly enough, it turns out Ol’ Joe was right. And here we are.

BobMbx on August 15, 2010 at 2:28 PM

$1000 dollar fines huh… Anyone catch Adam Corola’s rant about illegal aliens down in LA? Cops leave them alone because they know they won’t pay any fines….

liquidflorian on August 15, 2010 at 2:40 PM

I’ve always thought that if the federal government begins to refuse illegals handed over by Arizona, they should start a ‘California Express’, a free one-way bus service to sanctuary cities in California. Drop a few in Beverly Hills just for fun. Terminal stop San Fran, with a map to the nearest state office to sign up for welfare.

slickwillie2001 on August 15, 2010 at 3:20 PM

Just when you thought they were all communists, they prove they do believe in private property — so long as it’s their property.

CJ on August 15, 2010 at 3:21 PM

Time for the illegal aliens to crash an A-list Hollywood shindig en masse, and put this silly attempt at “law enforcement” in its place.

J.E. Dyer on August 15, 2010 at 3:23 PM

Hey, isn’t that what Arizona is saying, too? They want to enforce security procedures, and their populace is definitely in favor of that.

One of the main problems critics have with the Arizona law is the racial profiling. They said race couldn’t be the *sole* reason, but it’s still an element. There’s nothing like that with this Hollywood law, and if there was an element of racial profiling (for example, greater suspicion on black people), then it would be a similar problem.

You’re just taking a gratuitous dig at critics of the Arizona law without really addressing the main content of the criticism.

tneloms on August 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM

How ’bout something to keep Californians from crossing through Oregon and over the Washington border? Maybe a fence through Salem?

29Victor on August 15, 2010 at 4:53 PM

As James Woods once said: “Celebrities are all liberal until you walk on their beach”.

Travis Bickle on August 15, 2010 at 5:41 PM

One of the main problems critics have with the Arizona law is the racial profiling. They said race couldn’t be the *sole* reason, but it’s still an element. There’s nothing like that with this Hollywood law, and if there was an element of racial profiling (for example, greater suspicion on black people), then it would be a similar problem.

You’re just taking a gratuitous dig at critics of the Arizona law without really addressing the main content of the criticism.

tneloms on August 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM

So you must be against the federal law as well huh?

People like you should be expelled from the union. To assuage some childish white guilt you will let anyone of non-white descendant rape and mutilate the average American’s children, brothers, sisters, husbands, wives. All for your religion of political correctness. Good people are dead because of voters like you. You are a cancer on our sovereignty.

Like Hollywood you have zero skin in the game. You don’t live in the affected areas, you don’t drive the same streets, you would not dare shop in the same stores, and god forbid you would deal with an illegal in person unless you hired them under the table to raise your kids or trim your hedges.

Had it with you fckers.

ClassicCon on August 15, 2010 at 5:50 PM

So you must be against the federal law as well huh?

People like you should be expelled from the union. To assuage some childish white guilt you will let anyone of non-white descendant rape and mutilate the average American’s children, brothers, sisters, husbands, wives. All for your religion of political correctness. Good people are dead because of voters like you. You are a cancer on our sovereignty.

Like Hollywood you have zero skin in the game. You don’t live in the affected areas, you don’t drive the same streets, you would not dare shop in the same stores, and god forbid you would deal with an illegal in person unless you hired them under the table to raise your kids or trim your hedges.

Had it with you fckers.

ClassicCon on August 15, 2010 at 5:50 PM

Wow, way to overreact. Nothing you said has anything to do with what I wrote. I was talking about the racial profiling aspect of Arizona’s law.

You somehow jumped to the conclusion that I’m against the federal law (which is not true) and went nuts with that. You also assumed for some reason that I don’t live in affected areas (also not true) or that I haven’t met or “dealt with” several illegal immigrants (also not true), not that this has anything to do with my original comment.

tneloms on August 15, 2010 at 6:27 PM

tneloms: ILLEGAL knows no specific race… Due to geography and a pourous border, an estimated 90% of ILLEGAL ALIENS are from Mexico…

If you’re stopped by the police, be prepared to show ID… If you dopn’t have any, and you are here ILLEGALLY, be prepared to go back TO YOUR HOME COUNTRY…

If you are here ILLEGALLY, America is NOT your home… We are a country, not a continental land mass with a border of your choosing…

Wake up, you idiot…

Khun Joe on August 15, 2010 at 6:28 PM

THRE IS NO RACIAL PROFILING WITH THE ARIZONA LAW!!!

Please provide proof of ONE CASE of racial profiling!!!!!

Khun Joe on August 15, 2010 at 6:29 PM

Khun Joe on August 15, 2010 at 6:28 PM

I’m not sure what point you’re making. I was talking about racial profiling being allowed under the Arizona law.

THRE IS NO RACIAL PROFILING WITH THE ARIZONA LAW!!!

Please provide proof of ONE CASE of racial profiling!!!!!

Khun Joe on August 15, 2010 at 6:29 PM

The law does not preclude racial profiling (except as the sole cause of suspicion), so many people are worried that racial profiling will be used. The law has been in effect for less than 3 weeks, so it’s impossible to know whether this is founded yet, but if it turns out that racial profiling is never used then those critiques will lose their force. Meanwhile, however, people are still concerned.

I’m not sure how you can confidently state that racial profiling will never be used, but even if somehow you’re right, it doesn’t have anything to do with my comment. My point was very simply that this post is wrong to point out any hypocrisy in this Hollywood law, because it has nothing to do with racial profiling. It’s not necessarily hypocritical of someone to want to prevent trespassing on private property, but still be concerned about a separate law that may encourage racial profiling.

tneloms on August 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM

“Illegal is not a race” -Arizona Attorney-General Terry Goddard

slickwillie2001 on August 15, 2010 at 9:12 PM

Leave the state. You won’t regret losing the cement, ridiculous housing prices, failing schools, gang warfare or pathetic legislature. Places of beauty await. Open spaces call. Breathe free again.

Mae on August 16, 2010 at 12:04 AM

Wow, way to overreact. Nothing you said has anything to do with what I wrote. I was talking about the racial profiling aspect of Arizona’s law.

You somehow jumped to the conclusion that I’m against the federal law (which is not true) and went nuts with that. You also assumed for some reason that I don’t live in affected areas (also not true) or that I haven’t met or “dealt with” several illegal immigrants (also not true), not that this has anything to do with my original comment.

tneloms on August 15, 2010 at 6:27 PM

This is such a farce. First, the AZ law mirrors the federal law. thus, you have to argue that all federal immigration law is also “wrong”. Unfortunately, we have a huge southern border where teh vast majority of illegals coming across are latino. that is simply a fact, this childish argument about “racial profiling” is really a red herring by people like yourself who do not believe that the U.S. has a right to have a border, to have immigration laws, or enforce immigration laws. when there are 15 million illegals in the country, and 80% of them are latino, of course there is going to be “racial profiling” because commons sense dictates that you concentrate on the problem, not some idiocy.

For instance, we play this same game at airports, where 80 year old white women are taken aside to be search in order to prevent terrorism by 20-something islamic/arabic men. that is what has come from liberal “thought” about racial profiling. In order to have white liberal guilt aussaged, we disregard logic and fact.

The AZ law sought to enforce federal law. there is nothing wrong with that. the fact that you don’t see the hypocrasy in liberal CA enacting laws to enforce borders between celeberities and non, while being in favor of open borders, demonstrates not just hypocrasy, but idiocy. A legitimate inability to recognize facts and draw rational conclusions from those facts.

Instead of being honest in your opinion that the U.S. has no right to a border or to immigration laws, you are dishonest and argue about some fantasy “racial profiling” problem. It is pathetic.

I hope that your home border is illegally crossed as often as possible. what right do you have to keep anyone out of your house? Why should they not be allowed into your home to better their lives? If you keep someone out of your house because they do not look like you, isn’t that profiling? why do you have the right to do that? If someone comes into your house without permission, why should the police be able to do anything? After all, it is just a silly law making it illegal to come into your house without permission. why enforce it?

Idiot.

Monkeytoe on August 16, 2010 at 8:20 AM

I’ll never forget the words said to me by that great Mexican, Juan Lopez. He said, “joo wan’ more coffee, man?”

Wills on August 16, 2010 at 8:40 AM

BadgesID card, to god-damned hell with badgesID cards! We have no badgesID card. In fact, we don’t need badgesID cards. I don’t have to show you any stinking badgesID card, you god-damned cabrón and ching’ tu madre!

tneloms – the law also doesn’t preclude shooting people on sight either and by the way if we were bordered by a Scandinavian country I suspect the police would look at people with blond hair and blue eyes more closely. Law enforcement are simply doing what they are charged with, protecting the citizenry.

PatriotPete on August 16, 2010 at 3:27 PM