July job losses hit 131,000, rate stays at 9.5%; Update: June revised downward by almost 100K jobs
posted at 8:45 am on August 6, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
The Department of Labor announced another mixed-bag status this morning on employment. Non-farm job losses hit 131,000 in July, thanks mainly to the departure of 143,000 Census Bureau temps. Private-sector payrolls gained 71,000, an improvement on the past two months — but still not enough to claim overall job creation gains when considering population growth.
Total nonfarm payroll employment declined by 131,000 in July, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 9.5 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Federal government employment fell, as 143,000 temporary workers hired for the decennial census completed their work. Private-sector payroll employment edged up by 71,000.
Both the number of unemployed persons, at 14.6 million, and the unemployment rate, at 9.5 percent, were unchanged in July. …
In July, the number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) was little changed at 6.6 million. These individuals made up 44.9 per-
cent of unemployed persons. (See table A-12.)The civilian labor force participation rate (64.6 percent) and the employment-population ratio (58.4 percent) were essentially unchanged in July; however, these measures have declined by 0.6 percentage point and 0.4 point, respectively, since April.
The employment-population ratio remained at 58.4%, which means we’re still skipping along the bottom end of a generational dive. Discouraged workers remained at 1.2 million for the second straight month. The minimal job creation hasn’t moved people back into the workforce, and the population is still outgrowing the jobs.
This isn’t a Recovery Summer. It’s a slow slide, certainly better than the rapid disintegration of 2009, but we haven’t replaced those jobs yet, either. Job losses are cumulative. In a normal recovery with proper economic policies of lower barriers to investor entry, we would see a rapid replacement of jobs in this time frame that would take us back to somewhere around 80% of what was lost, with the remaining 20% being the most difficult to recover. We have not yet even begun that ascent. I’ll update this with a couple of slides later this morning to demonstrate the problem.
Expect the White House to hail the best private-sector job creation numbers since March, but economists won’t get fooled. We’re still descending, and will until we get job creation solidly above 100,000 new additions per month.
Update: This is ugly:
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for May was revised from +433,000 to +432,000, and the change for June was revised from -125,000 to -221,000.
That’s a subtraction of 97,000 jobs over those two months. That’s very ugly — and perhaps even “unexpected.”
Update II: Reuters notes that private-sector job growth was, ahem, “less than expected”:
Employment fell for a second straight month in July as more temporary census jobs ended while private hiring rose less than expected, pointing to an anemic economic recovery.
They also forget the point about job losses being cumulative, as they almost always do, by attempting to cheer people up about layoffs and terminations having “moderated significantly”:
Despite the tepid private sector jobs growth, the pace of layoffs has moderated significantly from the first quarter of last year, when employers were culling an average of 752,000 jobs a month.
Well, yeah — because those jobs are still lost. No one thought that pace would continue forever, regardless of the economic policies of the Democrats. The point is that a year later, we should be looking at significant gains in recovering those jobs, not tooting horns because the slope of the decline has shallowed out.
Update III: In Update I, I had thought the May revision was down to +422K, a drop of 11,000, when it was only a drop of 1,000 to +432K. That makes the two-month revision 97,000, not 107,000, which I’ve fixed above.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Each Democrat Congressman job loss this fall will translate into 100,000 new jobs.
If we can talk Obama and Biden into resigning after we throw out the corrupt clown Congress, each of them will be worth a million new jobs.
NoDonkey on August 6, 2010 at 8:55 AM
This is unexpected. And unprecendented.
B Man on August 6, 2010 at 8:55 AM
Why don’t these polling outfirts do a phone poll to ascertain what a more accurate number that isn’t warped by govt. hands.
thomasaur on August 6, 2010 at 8:56 AM
s/b outfits
thomasaur on August 6, 2010 at 8:57 AM
Are we in the second Great Depression yet? Or do we have to wait for Obama’s 2011 tax increases to push us over the edge.
Skandia Recluse on August 6, 2010 at 8:57 AM
The stimulus worked.
artist on August 6, 2010 at 8:57 AM
Oh perfect. More job losses than people entering the workforce. Success!!!
gleep on August 6, 2010 at 8:57 AM
They also revised downwardly by 97,000 the number of jobs created in May and June. Obama will attempt to spin this, but as usual most people will see right through it. It doesn’t help matters that his wife is living it up with 60 friends in Spain right now.
Doughboy on August 6, 2010 at 8:58 AM
Worse than expected. Job gains for May and June were adjusted downward. They had been over stated.
seven on August 6, 2010 at 8:59 AM
I’m gonna have to disagree with you on that one Ed.
forest on August 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM
but…but…just imagine how bad it COULD and WOULD have been if Lord Obama and Queen Piglosi hadn’t rescued us!
Recovery Summer…don’t forget your sunscreen!
Justrand on August 6, 2010 at 9:01 AM
(But I recommended a tune for waiting in line in my post about it.)
tree hugging sister on August 6, 2010 at 9:01 AM
the numbers are a disaster, plain and simple.
rob verdi on August 6, 2010 at 9:01 AM
CHANGE IT BACK
Good Lt on August 6, 2010 at 9:02 AM
Constitutional Crises Averted!
He has learned from Hugo Chavez. After we are all out of work and state dependent, The One can become Community Organizer For Life.
IlikedAUH2O on August 6, 2010 at 9:02 AM
The stimulus is working?
kingsjester on August 6, 2010 at 9:03 AM
Hey, at least it’s not 12, 13 or 15%.
Electrongod on August 6, 2010 at 9:04 AM
Good thing Congress voted to extend unemployment benefits since they are the best way to create jobs.
Beaglemom on August 6, 2010 at 9:04 AM
With huge tax increases coming next year; wow…
Surviving an attack at the hands of our own government will turn out to be the greatest battle I will have faced in my adult life.
Keemo on August 6, 2010 at 9:04 AM
The slide is going according to plan.
Along with the unemployment rate being high and unexpected, this is a byproduct:
tru2tx on August 6, 2010 at 9:04 AM
See timmy wanted us to expect it to rise, so now dear leader can tout this
cmsinaz on August 6, 2010 at 9:05 AM
Ed is rooting for the economy to tank!
Signed,
“We’re going to win a lot of seats on this war”
CDeb on August 6, 2010 at 9:06 AM
Great news! /
bernzright777 on August 6, 2010 at 9:07 AM
Sadly Obama probably is hoping that Americans become numb to the sight of 9.5% unemployment. That we get used to it being the new norm. But we’re a pretty greedy nation. Championing mediocrity is not a recipe for political success.
Doughboy on August 6, 2010 at 9:07 AM
We will continue our downward slide until Obama is gone. This country needs a huge dose of capitalism and it isn’t going to get it until Obama leaves office.
BetseyRoss on August 6, 2010 at 9:07 AM
I thought we needed 400,000 jobs per month to break even with population growth, not including all the lost jobs and even expanding the economy. If this is right, we’re a long, long way off from that.
TimTebowSavesAmerica on August 6, 2010 at 9:07 AM
What amazes me is the accuracy of these numbers but Obama and the Dems keep saying 3 million jobs saved or created.
Electrongod on August 6, 2010 at 9:07 AM
I’m cynical enough to believe the Obama Administration likes this bad news, is likely even cooking the books for bad news, so they can have a “stunning reversal” just before the November election, and the recession can be declared “over.” Yup. I’m that cynical.
Rational Thought on August 6, 2010 at 9:08 AM
I keep posting…there is only one issue, and only one that the Republicans should run on…the economy.
Everything else is trumped up distract voters on the most important issue in the past 40 years…we are losing jobs, and manufacturing at an alarming rate.
Someone has to step up and say, “Forget about everything else, everything, we can do nothing without a strong economy”
right2bright on August 6, 2010 at 9:08 AM
My friends and I are computer support contractors and go on and off payrolls constantly. Most of us get on W2s when we work. These days, contracts are for three month intervals with possibility to renew. If you don’t renew and can’t find anything else, off the payrolls you go.
We only need to know one thing: the job market sucks and this administration is doing nothing about it except make it worse with all their meddling.
Mr_Magoo on August 6, 2010 at 9:09 AM
Hey, this is unfair! Think of all the jobs the Leader has saved – it could be 100% unemployment.
pearson on August 6, 2010 at 9:10 AM
It will be a historic and unprecedented Greatest Depression.
the_nile on August 6, 2010 at 9:10 AM
Fudging on numbers in June?
Not unexpected.
I haven’t worked as an economist for many year. It blows my mind how crazy the economists are that work for Obama. One just quit yesterday. She may have tripped on a tiny piece of honesty or facts and got in trouble.
seven on August 6, 2010 at 9:10 AM
We keep losing at least 100k jobs a month, and the unemployment number stays at 9.5%.
This reminds me of the movie The Money Pit.
“How long will it all take?” “Two weeks.”
“Two weeks? That’s amazing!” “Amazing nothing, it’ll be a regular miracle!”
6 months later…still “two weeks.”
B Man on August 6, 2010 at 9:11 AM
The numbers are basically already in for the next 6 months, these monthly’s just confirm…there can’t be a “stunning” reversal.
This is like saying you are going to turn an ocean liner around in 100 yards, it physically can’t be done.
Hammering away at the economy is the safest campaign…
right2bright on August 6, 2010 at 9:11 AM
The headline at the Washington Post:
Companies hire at slow pace for 3rd straight month
Had Bush been President:
Economy sheds 131,000 jobs in May, highlighting a failure in the administration’s economic policies
ncconservative on August 6, 2010 at 9:12 AM
Remain calm. All is well.
Caper29 on August 6, 2010 at 9:12 AM
we are going over a cliff. The housing plunge plus the new derivatives market caused a temporary dislocation. In response the left and the media exploited this to pass a job killing agenda that increased their power at the expense of the rest of us. The kicker is that the left believes their policies are sustainable and create prosperity when in reality they have the reverse affect. Expect things to get worse before they get better as the solution to the government wrecking the economy will be greater government involvement.
rob verdi on August 6, 2010 at 9:13 AM
Oops…meant July.
ncconservative on August 6, 2010 at 9:13 AM
But wait for it…next month those “good” numbers (good according to pmsnbc) will have to be revised downward as it has just about every month since the manchurrian candidate took office.
PatriotPete on August 6, 2010 at 9:15 AM
Doughboy, you’re correct
cmsinaz on August 6, 2010 at 9:16 AM
No, we have to wait for a Republican to get elected. Then, we will be in the second Great Depression. At least that’s how it will play out in the MSM. Until then, enjoy the unexpectedly mild recession and funemployment.
Kafir on August 6, 2010 at 9:17 AM
Is it too much to think she’s grown a conscience and will speak out?
tru2tx on August 6, 2010 at 9:18 AM
Ncconservative, spot on
cmsinaz on August 6, 2010 at 9:18 AM
Oh, Really?
FLORIDA 11.4 , RHODE ISLAND 12.0 , CALIFORNIA 12.3 , MICHIGAN 13.2 , NEVADA 14.2
Rovin on August 6, 2010 at 9:18 AM
S u r p r i s e
carbon_footprint on August 6, 2010 at 9:19 AM
The unemployment rates stay where they are because people are giving up on finding a job and the Feds no longer count them.
Someone should start a monthly movement of every person out of work or wanting to work going to register for unemployment so the a better picture of real unemployment figures.
albill on August 6, 2010 at 9:20 AM
Almost choked on my kolache driving home…..the reporter on NPR said that today’s numbers on the job market to be released today should cast some hope on the improving economy……..as he sat at the mic collecting my tax dollars.
Limerick on August 6, 2010 at 9:23 AM
Your 107,000 figure is off, Ed.
-221,000 – -125,000 = -96,000
+432,000 – +433,000 = -1,000
year_of_the_dingo on August 6, 2010 at 9:24 AM
Who’s up for revisiting the policies of the past?
booter on August 6, 2010 at 9:24 AM
They can have “stunning reversal” by fudging the numbers.
They revise the numbers so often it’s easy to give the journolist some talking points.
the_nile on August 6, 2010 at 9:24 AM
Wondering…does any agency or group do a monthly unemployment rate for illegal aliens in the US?
(Don’t know how they would come up with the date though.)
albill on August 6, 2010 at 9:24 AM
Kafir, so true!
cmsinaz on August 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM
You’re surprised by NPR spinning for the Dems? BTW, if it isn’t already included in his roadmap, I hope Paul Ryan adds the defunding of NPR to his deficit reduction plan.
Doughboy on August 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM
Actually, under Obama math if nobody had a job and all had given up looking for one we would have full employment
tommyboy on August 6, 2010 at 9:27 AM
Democrats Tout Their Role in Stopping Employer Interrogation Program
Mervis Winter on August 6, 2010 at 9:29 AM
Maybe those 131,000 can bid on one of the 300,000 per month (last 16 month) homes that have been foreclosed on.
Limerick on August 6, 2010 at 9:30 AM
Love it, that’s now my facebook status!
melachiro on August 6, 2010 at 9:32 AM
The Obamas’ lavish lifestyle in times such as these is intentionally on display.
It’s meant to be some salt on the wounds.
justltl on August 6, 2010 at 9:32 AM
LBJs dream has turned into ‘The Grape Society’….sour ones.
Limerick on August 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM
With all this bad news, why is Obama at -12 today on Rasmussen? That’s the best he has been in months.
sandee on August 6, 2010 at 9:40 AM
Doesn’t matter wingnuts, weez pakin’ tha courtz!
-axltroll.
Inanemergencydial on August 6, 2010 at 9:43 AM
They can “tweak” them, but not a “stunning reversal”…the figures are basically already in.
For the next six months unemployment will be above 9%, they can’t “fudge” that in any way…they can lie, but it will be so obvious.
Now it could drop below 9%, but they would have to move quickly and reverse most all of their decisions…and tell the unions to pound sand.
Trends don’t move by 25% in 60 days…
right2bright on August 6, 2010 at 9:44 AM
It’s probably more a matter of maintaining some professional credibility rather than pique as was suggested yesterday.
Why should Fat-n-Happy have to try to spin these awful numbers when there is absolutely no excuse? She knows better that that, and she may have realized that no one is buying this crap any longer.
Cody1991 on August 6, 2010 at 9:45 AM
Ed, I see a 97,000 job subtraction.
Dusty on August 6, 2010 at 9:45 AM
Blue, BLUE, BLUE!!, BLUE!!, Blue.
Caper29 on August 6, 2010 at 9:46 AM
“Count on it!”
-crr6
“Yeah but the GOP….!”
-ernesto
“Nonsensical reasoning unrelated to topic!”
-jimbo3
“I like to eat paste!”
-growfins
Bishop on August 6, 2010 at 9:46 AM
His approval today is at 47%. Rasmussen’s had him consistently between 44-47% for a while now. There’s the occasional drop into the low 40′s or rise into the high 40′s, but he’s basically settled into that range.
Doughboy on August 6, 2010 at 9:47 AM
I’m confused. I thought the stimulus bill created like 3 trillion jobs, so what is all this nonsense about jobs lost?
/s
scalleywag on August 6, 2010 at 9:47 AM
Obama spoke inaptly. He meant 112, 113, or 115%.
Now try finding that, MF! :)
Dusty on August 6, 2010 at 9:51 AM
Ed, you’ll love this one. Headline at finance.yahoo.com:
Payrolls Shrink by 131,000, More Than Expected, Unemployment Stays at 9.5%
ncconservative on August 6, 2010 at 9:53 AM
But dear leader told us on his visit to the View that we had gained jobs in the private sector for five straight months. These revised numbers must just be part of the vast media conspiracy against him. All hail Obama! All witness the miracle of our savior’s stimulus plan! Rejoice comrades!
MississippiMom on August 6, 2010 at 9:56 AM
I look forward to Obama replacing that stormtrooper in 898 days.
Stormtrooper 2012!
Monica on August 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM
Real underemployment is now 18.4% up from last months 18.3%.
Always use the real BLS report, real government data is here at the BLS site. not the media hieroglyphs.
tarpon on August 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM
Never,Never,Never forget what the democrats and their journolister friends in the media sold us:
Two years ago next week, he (Obama) declared that history will mark his ascent to the presidency as the moment when ‘our planet began to heal’ and ‘the rise of the oceans began to slow.’ Well, when you anoint yourself King Canute, you mustn’t be surprised when your subjects expect you to command the tides.”
Charles Krauthammer
May 29,2010
Obama on passing the stimulus
In a little over one hundred days, this Recovery Act has worked as intended…
Obama statement regarding the stimulus
Radio address,July 11, 2009
Update II: Reuters notes that private-sector job growth was, ahem, “less than expected”:
But amid that bad news, Geithner said, were signs of growth in the private sector.
“If you look at the numbers last week that tell you what’s happening to the economy as a whole, what they showed is the private sector is getting stronger. So if you’d add together business investment and consumption, that part of the economy, which is what matters for the future, is getting progressively stronger and that’s very important,” Geithner said.
Tim Geithner: Private sector job growth is “pretty good”
“Right now, the best thing the government can do…is help create the conditions for the private sector to start to invest in hiring again,” he said. “Now, we’ve seen six months of positive job growth by the private sector. That’s pretty good,” Geithner said. “Pretty good this early in a recession.
Tim Geithner July 25, 2010
ABC News
February 25, 2010: While discussing the health-care bill, Nancy Pelosi declares,
“It’s about jobs. In its life [health-care reform] will create 4 million jobs, 400,000 jobs almost immediately.”
We are at such an economic crises in this country and we need to look at three things in this bill……JOBS….JOBS…JOBS!!!!!
Ca. Senator Barbra Boxer
So Obama puts VP Biden in charge of the stimulus….
“I’m absolutely, positively confident we are on the right track,” he said of the $787 million package.
Joe Biden, July 16, 2009
J Sargent Reynolds Community College
April 23, 2010: Joe Biden, at a Pennsylvania fundraiser:
“I’m here to tell you, some time in the next couple of months, we’re going to be creating between 250,000 jobs a month and 500,000 jobs a month.”
Thank God the “adults” are in charge!
Yes We Can!!!!!!
Baxter Greene on August 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM
Here’s a good question for the Dems. When a job is saved, for how long is it saved? Seems to me like a lot of the stimulus money went to preserve jobs at the state level, and now we’re having to scrounge up new money to save those same jobs for another year.
If they had told us up front that their version of stimulus meant paying state employees and not generating tax revenues, would fewer people have voted for it?
hawksruleva on August 6, 2010 at 10:03 AM
97,000 jobs…
97,000 jobs…
Why is that number familiar?
Wasn’t that the exact number of jobs INCREASED in May or June that Obamaa touted as proof the recovery was happening and we all had better pass the Financial Reform bill right now?! (and that we attributed to Census employees?)
Skywise on August 6, 2010 at 10:05 AM
The U6 number (fudged though it is) is officially at 16.5%
The real number is over 25% people. The government doesn’t count the 99ers or people that worked on 1099′s etc. The hard count must be close to 30 million by now.
Come 01/01/11 it will get worse. I see many small businesses of all types closing up shop.
Have you all seen the unemployment situation in California? That is the future for the rest of us.
dogsoldier on August 6, 2010 at 10:06 AM
It’s times like this that I miss the trolling lib fools.
PALIN!
That usually draws them out.
Bishop on August 6, 2010 at 10:07 AM
Seems to me that the jobs that were “saved” were civil servants (actually some growth there) and union members.
The private sector has been royally screwed, and it was intentional. We’ll see how this plays out for the Dems and their Chump in Chief. Not well, I suspect. They have to go, and the sooner the better.
Cody1991 on August 6, 2010 at 10:07 AM
Ok i am wondering…
If things are this terrible, what are the chances that even if I manage to snag one of the few jobs being created, that I will lose it again within a year?
I am praying that November brings the change!!!
CambellBrown on August 6, 2010 at 10:08 AM
Before the recession started the civilian labor force participation rate was 66.5 percent, if it had remained unchanged (i.e. if people hadn’t given up looking for work) the unemployment rate would now be 12.2 percent.
agmartin on August 6, 2010 at 10:10 AM
I heard it on impeccable authority if you want to go forward you put it “D”, if you want to go backward you put it in “R”. I can’t remember who said it but I have heard he is brilliant, maybe the smartest human being ever. It will come to me.
Cindy Munford on August 6, 2010 at 10:10 AM
..guess the redhead’s given up her search and/or had her cell phone repo’ed.
The War Planner on August 6, 2010 at 10:15 AM
It’s not 12,13,14…
Really?
What are the numbers if we count them the same way joblessness was counted in the Great Depression? Anyone?
Because I’d really like to know. My suspicion is tha the numbers today are suspiciously close to those of the 1930s
WashingtonsWake on August 6, 2010 at 10:15 AM
Ras today:
47% Approval
30% Strong approve
WTF is wrong with people in this country?
angryed on August 6, 2010 at 10:17 AM
The only solution I came up with is to become an entreprenuer. Work for yourself. I started writing, but there are lots of things we can do to employ ourselves.
Don’t give in to despair, but do not believe the administration’s propaganda either.
dogsoldier on August 6, 2010 at 10:18 AM
We’ve got the fever! We’re hot! We can’t be stopped! Recovery Summer fever: catch it!
ya2daup on August 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM
It’s a great time if you have a job or are already on welfare. Prices are falling, you can pick up used cars, furniture, and jewelry for practically nothing, hotels and resorts are giving away rooms. In Detroit you can buy a house for $1000. Depressions are really good times if you are still employed.
Don’t forget that one out of every 6 people employed in this country now are working for a government at some level. Most of them love Obama.
rockmom on August 6, 2010 at 10:27 AM
Insightful and on point: guess those four a$$hat trolls are out of a job now.
ya2daup on August 6, 2010 at 10:29 AM
we should be thanking someone….can’t think who but I’m sure there is someone out there to thank for this great news…./
ted c on August 6, 2010 at 10:29 AM
Why is the price of gas still under $3 in the middle of the Summer?
faraway on August 6, 2010 at 10:32 AM
I researched this an posted it here several months ago. In the depression, peak unemployment was at or slightly over 25%, but they used a different formula and included those over the age of 14 who lost jobs as well. (Remember the depression was before the enactment of child labor laws).
Subtracting out the underage workers, 20% of workers lost their jobs at the height of the depression
Our government has changed the method of collecting, computing and reporting the unemployment statistics several times since then. The current administration has changed the method of computing the officially reported number at least twice since last year.
We exceeded depression level unemployment months ago.
dogsoldier on August 6, 2010 at 10:36 AM
Michelle Obama is doing her part to stimulate the economy, of Spain.
Barack Obama is in Chicago raising $$ for his buddy Giannoulias, whose family bank gave millions in loans to convicted felon Rezko, and was recently shut down by the FDIC.
WOW! Where are the JOBS?? The Obama’s could care less about JOBS.
TN Mom on August 6, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Oh crap Dusty, I thought those were his bowling scores. (or they could be his golf scores too)
Rovin on August 6, 2010 at 10:42 AM
As bad as it is, the U-3 9.5% figure is pure spin.
The “official” U-6 unemployment number (which conservatives should be using instead of the phony-balony U-3 number) is 16.5%.
The “real-real” unemployment number is 22%, which is depression-level, since we are effectively in a depression caused by the socialist policies of the democrat party, is no surprise.
Rebar on August 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM
LMAO.
Dusty on August 6, 2010 at 10:54 AM
my grandparents survived the depression in the 30′s, and my grandma used to tell me “cut off your hair, so you don’t need so much shampoo!” — she was a psycho about saving every scrap of tin foil too.
I used to think she was a little nutty, but now I am sitting here thinking about how little food me and the kids could survive on if we had to. Incredible what a “famine” like this does to your outlook!
CambellBrown on August 6, 2010 at 10:55 AM
So, if “D” is for forward and “R” is for reverse, which way do we want to go when approaching the cliff?
UnderstandingisPower on August 6, 2010 at 11:01 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »