G.M. CEO to feds: We’re tired of being “Government Motors” so how about selling your shares?
posted at 9:01 pm on August 5, 2010 by Allahpundit
They’re preparing an IPO and want the feds’ shares — all of the feds’ shares — to be part of it. Treasury’s considering it, but you know how it is: Once you’ve got hold of something special, it’s … so hard to let go.
“We want the government out, period,” Mr. Whitacre said in comments after speaking at an automotive conference in northern Michigan. “We don’t want to be known as Government Motors.”…
Eliminating government ownership, he said, would be good for employee morale and would improve G.M.’s image. While unusual, selling all the shares during an initial offering is not unheard of. The credit card giant Visa raised about $19 billion during an offering in March 2008. The risk of a large offering, analysts said, is that interest among buyers could wane as the sale approaches, causing the price to fall. A Treasury spokesman, Mark Paustenbach, declined to comment on Thursday. The department issued a statement in June saying that G.M. would control the timing of the offering but that the Treasury would “retain the right, at all times, to decide whether and at what level to participate in the offering, should it occur.”…
Mr. Whitacre dismissed concerns by some analysts that G.M. was moving too fast. Many have speculated that the Obama administration, whose decision to help G.M. and Chrysler last year was widely unpopular, wants the offering to occur before the November elections.
Not only would unloading the stock give Obama a windfall to tout to voters vis-a-vis repaying the bailout money, but it’d reassure the public that he meant it when he famously said long ago, “I don’t want to run auto companies.” (It’d also get him free and clear of a certain electric lemon that shall remain nameless.) If you want to rebut the talking point that you’re a socialist, there are worse ways to do it than by putting ownership of America’s largest auto manufacturer back into public circulation. And yet … no commitment yet by the Treasury Department to sell any of its shares. Why not?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
How about they give the shares back from the original shareholders they stole them from?
Jason Coleman on August 6, 2010 at 12:22 AM
Bah, “back to”
Jason Coleman on August 6, 2010 at 12:22 AM
All I can say is, good luck getting that camel out of your tent.
Voyager on August 6, 2010 at 12:34 AM
GM alone was ~$70B in bailout funds. Note: GMs highest-ever market cap was $52B. Looks like somebody paid a premium of at least $18B.
Exuberance, baby!
BobMbx on August 6, 2010 at 12:37 AM
Very good point. Bond holders were robbed by the government and the Unions were rewarded with fresh money to their pensions, as tax payer expense.
If Americans really wanted to send a message about Government Motors (cause it ain’t General any more), they would refuse to purchase anything GM and let it fail, completely.
In order to rid the body of the cancer, which is what the Unions are, the body must die, in order to be reborn.
Kill it, then give us back the cars we really want.
Kini on August 6, 2010 at 12:48 AM
If this is accurate that Ed Whitacre said that- he will soon join McChrystal under the bus. GM knew full well what they were getting into- when they took the bail out money.They made a deal with the devil and now they have to pay the devil his due. Actually the UAW nows runs GM and Chrysler. That was their payback for getting Obama elected with Union money. It is ironic that the UAW who had a lot to due with the demise of these once great auto companies,now runs both of them. Would not surprise me if the democrats passed a bill and Obama signed it- that all Americans would be mandated to buy a GM or Chrysler car. They signed a bill forcing Americans to buy Health Insurance. Hugo Chavez is proud of his student- Obama.
flintstone on August 6, 2010 at 12:54 AM
I don’t think Ed Whitacre wants to be at GM anyway. He may be pissed at Behozebub for making him go on the TV and lie about the loan repayment, but he should have been smarter than that. Maybe he’s just too old and tired, and maybe he should never have gone to GM begin with. Especially with the inauspicious start by saying (approx) “I don’t know cars”.
bbhack on August 6, 2010 at 1:09 AM
Time for Obama to put his money where his mouth is. Let’s see how much faith he has in GM.
OxyCon on August 6, 2010 at 1:40 AM
Exactly. The thousands of Americans that were shafted by that sleazy bankruptcy should get their shares back.
ButterflyDragon on August 6, 2010 at 2:49 AM
You guys are almost as humorless and naive as a bunch of liberals. And you missed playing THE RACE CARD!
Our leaders have been doing tricks for the imports for years. So why not sell out to the domestic manufacturers? It is the American Way!
http://barrysacks5.com/
And have you considered that GM would never want to get rid of the gov’t if the ride was so sweet? They had that whole “witch hunt” advatage, didn’t they? No paranoia evinced by posters about that.
And now for some humor:
The Japanese had the whole thing pegged.
We just don’t like Asians.
It is RACISM!!!
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/toyota-%E2%80%93-japanese-perspective
IlikedAUH2O on August 6, 2010 at 4:03 AM
Because the Boss is still vacationing in Spain?
garry on August 6, 2010 at 6:16 AM
What insane person is going to buy shares in GM?
Wait never mind. 53% of the adult population voted for Obama. They’ll find plenty of idiots to buy.
angryed on August 6, 2010 at 7:12 AM
Government Motors should be concerned about their image. I would never, ever consider buying another GM vehicle simply because it is government owned.
Buying a Government Motors vehicle equates to supporting the whole, rotten GM takeover by the government.
PCWilliams on August 6, 2010 at 7:27 AM
The more press that GM’s demand gets, the better taxpayers’ chance of unloading that monstrosity from the tax load.
Obama? Talk is cheap. Put it up while there’s still a market.
maverick muse on August 6, 2010 at 7:29 AM
No, after begging and insisting on a bail-out from taxpayers, I’ll NEVER buy a GM or Chysler automobile.
FORD RULES!
My wish, Ford’s diesel turbine Fiesta sold in Europe.
maverick muse on August 6, 2010 at 7:34 AM
Wish the CEO would discuss the pressure/influence he gets from the federal Government from being 61% owned by the Government.
/Did you know that about 21% of Volkswagen (also owner of Porsche, Audi, Seat, Bentley, Lamborghini,Bugatti, et al) is owned by the local state (Lower Saxony) German government?)
albill on August 6, 2010 at 8:04 AM
Government Motors is trying to Unring the Bell here. That’s like telling the Mafia “Thanks for the loan but we would like you to leave us alone now.
After what happened to the GM Bond holders in that half assed bankruptcy maneuver, who in their right mind would risk any money in this IPO?
Uniblogger on August 6, 2010 at 8:38 AM
Been a GM guy all of my life. The second they announced the Gubmint Motors bail out I sold it and bought a Ford. I now have two. Good luck Mr. Whitacare. I hope that you and the stockholders can regain your company. IF YOU DO though, please remember these past few years lest ye repeat history. You have got to assert your authority with the unions when negotiating. Just like so many of us who walked away from your company and products, you need to have the balls to let them walk during tough negotiations. There will be other skilled workers ready to replace them.
As an aside, my daughter turns 16 in a year and a half. She LOVES the new Camaro’s. As of now she is settling for the Mustang, so if you get this done soon, I can surprise her.
J.
JohnnyMojo on August 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM
The Government really is beginning to make a name for itself as the 800 pound gorilla.
jeanie on August 6, 2010 at 8:53 AM
Government Motors is back to making political donations. $41000.00 to lawmakers pet projects. $36,000. of this amount went to the Congressional Black Caucus. This information came from the Washington Post in an article by T.W. Farnam,on 8/5/2010.
Obama uses taxpayers money to bail out the UAW and now the money is also used to support democrat lawmakers.
flintstone on August 6, 2010 at 9:35 AM
I agree 100%
Ford may still have the cancer of the unions but they are our only domestic product that didn’t take a bailout. I will by Fords.
brtex on August 6, 2010 at 10:23 AM
So the unions were basically handed control of GM, and now they want the government out? Interesting.
With that attitude, I’m betting Mr.Whiteacre will be stuck with Obama at his hip for a few more years, and more than that if O gets a 2nd term. God forbid!!!
capejasmine on August 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Trouble with employee morale in the Socialist Paradise? Quel suprise!
PattyJ on August 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM
The UAW was ‘bailed out’ as much as GM and Chrysler were, we need to remember that. The UAW disease infects Ford as much as our other domestic manufacturers. We also need to remember that while GM may have spent $41,000 of our money on donations to Congress, the UAW’s political machine has not paused for a second. They are still lobbying and paying off their favorite supporters in Congress, also with our money.
Ford is little better than GM. Don’t buy the union label.
slickwillie2001 on August 6, 2010 at 12:05 PM
That’s right. The unions are going to hit the ceiling when their piece of the pie gets taken away from them and we all know where the unions pitch their tents politically.
LarryG on August 6, 2010 at 12:25 PM
I join the chorus of people that will never buy a GM due to the way they were bailed out, giving the unions interest in the company with taxpayer money.
O.T. it would be nice to see a spell checker here…
bbordwell on August 6, 2010 at 12:38 PM
How about we forget the IPO/share price shell game. Just give back all the taxpayer dough GM received.
borntoraisehogs on August 6, 2010 at 12:42 PM
That is my question/hope as well. (Yes, I was a shareholder.) What makes it worse is that OUR tax money was used to steal what was left of our company from us. It will be a cold day in H*ll before I ever buy anything from Government Motors or Chrysler (which hurts as I want a Jeep).
Kevin K. on August 6, 2010 at 12:45 PM
If the Government ever re-privatizes GM by selling its shares, any proceeds MUST go to pay down Government debt. We the taxpayers are already paying interest on the Government’s bailout money paid to GM.
Good luck with trying to re-privatize a government-owned car company. The French carmarker Renault was nationalized in 1981, and the first attempt at privatization was in 1996, when the French state’s share dropped from 53% to 46%, and Volvo bought 15%. There was another merger with Nissan in 2002, but the French Government still holds 16% of Renault, although private shareholders now own 63% of the company.
It can be done, but it’s a long, hard slog.
Steve Z on August 6, 2010 at 12:46 PM
What about the UAW stock? Will that go on the block as well?
SukieTawdry on August 6, 2010 at 2:10 PM
So then it would be Union Motors. I still want nothing to do with them.
{^_^}
herself on August 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM
The country would rather be free and clear of a certain political lemon that tries so hard to be blameless.
chickasaw42 on August 6, 2010 at 4:33 PM
I dislike unions and the only GM person I am related to is a stupid jerk. But….
You guys bashing American manufacturers remind me of the RVN Assembly stabbing one another in the back while the north sent tanks right down route one.
IlikedAUH2O on August 6, 2010 at 4:35 PM
I hate the idea of killing the company just to kill the Unions but I think its the only option we have.
Great idea! I love it.
Conservative Samizdat on August 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM
GM/Chrysler – you can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube. I’m finished with you. Some people may have forgotten, but I’ll never forget.
Obama’s GM/Chrysler Deal Violates Bankruptcy Laws and Constitution -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBa2JIoMwzQ&feature=related
SoldiersMom on August 6, 2010 at 11:35 PM
I will never buy from either of the Government Motors companies.
Dandapani on August 8, 2010 at 9:55 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2