Dem pollster says voters not buying Bush-boogeyman strategy
posted at 9:30 am on August 3, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
If Democrats want to convince anyone not already firmly in their own camp to support their candidates, they need a better argument than BushBushBushBushBush. National Journal reports the results of a poll commissioned by a Democrat-leaning think tank that shows voters don’t consider today’s GOP as watercarriers for Barack Obama’s predecessor. Almost two-thirds of respondents see Republican control of Congress as, well, Hope and Change:
Dems have tried repeatedly to tie the GOP to Bush’s economic policies, which remain highly unpopular. But so far, that hasn’t worked, according to officials at the Dem-leaning Third Way think tank.
“Just eighteen months after President Bush left office with the nation’s economy in historic freefall, two-thirds of Americans now see congressional Republicans and their economic ideas as new and completely separate from those of the former president,” the group wrote in a strategy memo sent to Dem leaders last month.
A majority, 53%, of Americans still blame Pres. Bush for the country’s economic woes, while 26% pin the blame on Pres. Obama. Only 14% give Bush excellent or good ratings on handling the federal budget, and 28% say he helped the middle class, according to a survey from Benenson Strategy Group.
But just 25% of Americans say that the GOP’s return to power in Congress will mean a return to those unpopular Bush policies. Fully 65% believe a GOP Congress would promote “a new economic agenda that is different from George W. Bush’s policies.”
A thin fraction of independent voters (22%) and Dems (32%) believe the GOP is set to return to Bush’s agenda. That’s great news for GOPers, who seem headed for an electoral romp this year, and bad news for Dems, who see tying the GOP to Bush’s legacy as a surefire way of beating back the GOP onslaught.
Of course, Barack Obama has not quite caught up to the news:
Obama said that after losing control of Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008, Republicans did not engage in new thinking but stuck to the same policies that led the United States into the worst recession since the Great Depression.
“It’s not like they engaged in some heavy reflection. They have not come up with a single, solitary new idea to address the challenges of the American people. They don’t have a single idea that is different from George Bush’s,” he said.
Republicans, he said, are betting that Americans had forgotten recent history.
Which recent history? The recent history of Obama’s promise to keep unemployment below 8% if Congress gave him $787 billion to spend? That recent history? Or the recent history showing that civilian participation in the workforce has hit a historic low under his leadership? How about the $2.2 trillion math error made by the Obama White House in calculating future deficits? The failure of the stimulus plan to sustain real growth instead of just creating gimmicky spikes in markets?
Obama wants voters to forget recent history, not remember it. Unfortunately, the Bush Boogeyman Boogie simply isn’t as effective as it was in 2008, before Obama won his election and had to start governing for himself. Not only has that failed to keep criticism from falling on his shoulders, it hasn’t kept almost two-thirds of voters from noticing that the GOP has become more free-market oriented since the retirement of the man who claimed to have violated those principles in order to save the free market.
Voters have seen four years of the Democratic agenda from Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, and two years of incompetence from Barack Obama. The real boogeymen in this cycle are all Democrats, and chanting BushBushBushBushBush just demonstrates how far out of touch Democratic leadership has become from the electorate.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
he’s still basking in his appearance on The View….
ted c on August 3, 2010 at 9:33 AM
I think Ann Coulter put it best when she said that every once in awhile America puts the liberals in charge because they forget how bad they are. Once they do – they rush at the first chance they get to get rid of them.
Buyers remorse should be the theme of this election. Either that or “We told you so”
gophergirl on August 3, 2010 at 9:34 AM
according to Obama its unfair for voters to compare what he promises to what actually happens. As for his supporters, they just call that racist.
rob verdi on August 3, 2010 at 9:35 AM
Saw Howie baby Dean this morning via remote from Mars, then.
Marcus on August 3, 2010 at 9:35 AM
They try to revise history, ignore history, and manufacture history that never occurred. Will anyone ever see Summer 2010 as anything resembling a “Recovery Summer”? Hellz nahh. Will anyone besides the intellectual powerhouses of Pookie, Snookie, or Cookie ever know that Obama is to blame for what is going on right now? Hellz yes.
and the hurricane gathers….
ted c on August 3, 2010 at 9:36 AM
PBHO discovering that presidenting means more than date nights in NYC and using AF1 to shuttle his wife around to exotic shopping locales.
Bishop on August 3, 2010 at 9:37 AM
Watch how the media starts running lots of articles about George Bush to remind voters of him and isn’t Bush bringing out a book this fall?
albill on August 3, 2010 at 9:37 AM
This is not a communist nation – therefore, the voters will reject the Democratic party in November.
The Democrats came out of the closet as Communists and radicals a bit too soon – and Americans see them for what they are now.
Hell – I bet Bush would beat Obama in a race today.
HondaV65 on August 3, 2010 at 9:38 AM
How many of that 53% still blaming Bush is aware that Dems controlled Congress from Jan, 2007?
OldEnglish on August 3, 2010 at 9:40 AM
hell–i bet a ham sandwich would beat him…..
ted c on August 3, 2010 at 9:40 AM
I don’t think it would even be close.
gophergirl on August 3, 2010 at 9:42 AM
going back to dear leader’s analogy, ‘Put in your car in (D)rive instead of (R)everse’
I say put that sucker in (R)everse before we head off the cliff….
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 9:43 AM
That poll is too difficult for the un-initiated, like myself, to understand. I’m not going to pay any attention to it. Too many statistical variables(I believe that is the terminology?)for this old lady. Thanks anyway.
jeanie on August 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM
the msm is keeping it up for the (D)s…
i say, keep on, keeping on….it will be that much sweeter…
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM
But when I ask a lefty, specifically what did Bush do, I get a blank deer in the headlights look. The more clever leftists will try to blame the economic woes on “not enough regulation” which of course assumes capitalism if left unregulated will take us to hell in a handbasket… a favorite commie boogie man.
rhombus on August 3, 2010 at 9:45 AM
My sense is that not only are folks not buying the “Bush Boogyman” argument, their anti-Donk, anti-Obama views are hardening.
Guess that’s what a Bait & Switch strategy will getcha…
Bruno Strozek on August 3, 2010 at 9:45 AM
It won’t be long now before the folks realize that Bush wasn’t so bad after all.
Miss ‘im yet?
rollthedice on August 3, 2010 at 9:45 AM
you are correct…
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 9:45 AM
not many at all, for sure…
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM
You own it Mr. President.
Oil Can on August 3, 2010 at 9:47 AM
Ed, PERFECT picture for this thread…
:)
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 9:47 AM
Dems don’t consider what voters choose to buy or not—Dems only consider their ideology, then forcefeed it to voters. Exhibit A, the Chevy Volt. Exhibit B, Obamacare.
ted c on August 3, 2010 at 9:48 AM
If anyone supports this boogeyman swill in the media, boycott them. The mainstream media cannot exist unless we allow them to. The lies and deceptions prevalent in all forms must be dealt with in order to survive as a nation as we know it.
volsense on August 3, 2010 at 9:48 AM
“Bush Boogeyman Boogie” — That dog won’t hunt!!!!
Bob in VA on August 3, 2010 at 9:48 AM
“Oh..Comrade Barry! Tell us again how you saved us from the dreadful Boosch… pretty pleeze! We never, ever tire of your wonderful stories!”
joe btfsplk on August 3, 2010 at 9:51 AM
When you demand the ball excuses become unacceptable at some point.
I read a fascinating analysis at Politico, I think, yesterday that I haven’t seen here. It is now 17 months since the Porkulus package passed, at the 17 month mark is when the sharp recovery began after Reagan’s economic package passed, it didn’t pass till August of ’81, O’s passed in February. So many O supporters in the media want to compare his numbers to Reagan’s but it’s 17 months and they’ve got nothin’.
lizzie beth on August 3, 2010 at 9:53 AM
Obama’s Rule of Unengagement
maverick muse on August 3, 2010 at 9:58 AM
Democrats to Run Against William Howard Taft in 2010
Mervis Winter on August 3, 2010 at 10:00 AM
Don’t give voters too much credit. Most still don’t know democrats have been in control for four years.
Republicans need to point out that Obama inherited from Bush/Democrats (including Obama himself).
GardenGnome on August 3, 2010 at 10:03 AM
The GOP ads write themselves:
Are you better off than you were before the 2006 midterm election?
Are you better off than you were before the 2008 general election?
onlineanalyst on August 3, 2010 at 10:03 AM
Fanatic Leftists just can’t get enough of that “blame Bush” mantra.
But Obama has managed to prove that the America that elected Obama is sick of his Marxism, absolutely angry with Obama who just can’t get across the post-racial bridge, remaining stuck on stupid blaming his “inheritance” for being linked to his own miserable irresponsible abuse to negate the Constitution from American government.
At this point, the more Obama blames Bush, the more America forgives Bush. That tipping point occurred already, expressed by the Tea Party and the majority of Americans who respond to Leftist polls claiming to be “conservative” now.
maverick muse on August 3, 2010 at 10:05 AM
Come on November!
GarandFan on August 3, 2010 at 10:06 AM
Saw this this morning on Instapundit.
Weight of Glory on August 3, 2010 at 10:09 AM
They’ll find another excuse. If not Bush then they’ll blame everything they’ve done on someone or something else.
They can’t take responsibilty for anything they’ve done … it’s all failed.
Does anyone really expect them to say: “Hi, we’re democrats and we’re proud of our policies that have destroyed the moral and social fabric of the United States. We’re tickled pink that we’ve undermined our national sovereignty and security by fighting against securing our borders and enticing illegals to flock in by the millions. Our fantastic education policies have done nothing but turn out morons who can’t even name the two countries that border the US … and our progressive indoctrination programs have ensured that the younger generation will be completely self absorbed, dependent on government and hating the United States!”
Vote for us !!
darwin on August 3, 2010 at 10:10 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2010-08-02-afghan-poll_N.htm
Obama at 41% approval at this poll.
ted c on August 3, 2010 at 10:10 AM
This is not a communist nation
HondaV65 on August 3, 2010 at 9:38 AM
Yet.
angryed on August 3, 2010 at 10:10 AM
They think we are stupid…
d1carter on August 3, 2010 at 10:11 AM
Amen! are you listening GOP?
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 10:13 AM
Wait a minute…wait a darned minute…you are saying that Bush wasn’t at fault?
Okay I am taking down my Bush poster with the Hitler mustache in my front yard.
right2bright on August 3, 2010 at 10:13 AM
Blame Obama for the market implosion leading up to the November ’08 potus election. Coincidentally, the economy tanked when it was obvious that doped up McCain couldn’t deliver an effective performance in campaign.
Granted, Bush allowed the Democrats their way, protesting with sheer lip service that Fanny/Freddy were in trouble. He left the federal inspectors hanging out to dry for Franks and Waters to whip mercilessly.
The president issuing an executive order remains culpable for the content and affect of his own order.
Bush made the very person who ruined the global economy for the benefit of his own elitist gain via Goldman Sachs an autonomous US Treasury czar, beholden to no one, above reproach or prosecution for corruption. But Obama wants that executive order to remain in effect to enable his own further corruption and complete theft of our nation’s treasury, i.e. our personal equity absconded by more taxes and destroyed by federal credit. And the media, to profit themselves, will never report on reality.
So though voters aren’t buying Obama’s ridiculously insane blame game rules of unengagement, not to be bothered with responsibility himself, voters would be foolish to select another neoconservative “compassionate conservative” globalist like Bush, just because he/she seems so engagingly down to earth and all-American. It would be a shame if Palin or Ryan were to assume globalist ideals beneath a patriotic veneer promising domestic attention again.
maverick muse on August 3, 2010 at 10:25 AM
It’s the genius of our founders. It has hiccups though when the message fails to get out.
Just like the republicans taking over Congress in 1994 curbed Clinton and made him look great vis-a-vis the economy. The democratic takeover in 2007 is polar opposite and made Bush look more horrid.
Yet the democrats will give the credit to Clinton and put the burden on Bush.
The GOP problem is, quite frankly, public relations.
carbon_footprint on August 3, 2010 at 10:27 AM
Which, I might add, is very, very difficult to do when 95% of all media carry the democratic water.
carbon_footprint on August 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM
Weight of Glory on August 3, 2010 at 10:09 AM
Don’t go that way. Never go that way!
maverick muse on August 3, 2010 at 10:30 AM
That comment is raaaaacist.
Physics Geek on August 3, 2010 at 10:32 AM
You know what the next liberal meme is going to be: “Them Repubs are more extremist than Bush!”
year_of_the_dingo on August 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM
Everything keeps changing. What am I to do?
One of us always tells the truth, and the other always lies.
Knock and the door will open.
Helping Hands
maverick muse on August 3, 2010 at 10:36 AM
The GOP problem is, quite frankly, public relations.
carbon_footprint on August 3, 2010 at 10:27 AM
Which, I might add, is very, very difficult to do when 95% of all media carry the democratic water.
carbon_footprint on August 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 10:37 AM
The silver lining in this marxist/redistributive cloud of tyranny,lies and opression we are being crushed by is the fact that the electorate is finally taking notice of the DISEASE that is progressivism/statism (insert tyrannical adjective of choice). We won’t know for sure till 11/3 but there is hope (REAL hope…not the changey libtard kind).
NY Conservative on August 3, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Which is why they keep on changing their name – to protect the guilty.
First Marxists, then Socialists then Communists then …..
Now they are (Neo) Progressive – which is strangely appropriate because it’s pretty much the same thing as being Oppressive.
Chip on August 3, 2010 at 10:50 AM
What’s funny is the Libs are calling Obama, Bush 2. He’s going back to the same policies that he slammed Bush for when he was campaigning. I guess it’s OK to follow the same policies and hope the voters don’t know it. I’m so tired of hearing Bush, Bush, Bush. Also tired of hearing the names of Obama, Michelle, Pelosi, Reid, etc.
quint906 on August 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM
It is refreshing to see people realizing that the era of BLAME BOOOOOOOOOSH!!! is finally at an end.
This mean, of course, that it is now time to celebrate the inauguration of the new exciting era of BLAME DEM-O-CRATSSS!!!!!!!
pilamaye on August 3, 2010 at 10:59 AM
You get extra points today for linking to that movie. Nicely done.
Weight of Glory on August 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM
And prior to that they were in a much stronger minority position than currently held by Repuplicans – who are now portrayed in the media as practically determining the Congressional agenda! Funny how Dems never seem to do anything wrong – or at least they never seem to be held responsible for doing them! Anytime they make a mistake, it turns out that “nobody knew” how bad it was, and therefor the results were “unexpected”!!
drunyan8315 on August 3, 2010 at 11:16 AM
Hate ginned up by the media dissipates slowly, but it does dissipate.
I met one of these Bush haters recently, I laughed in her face when she tried to use the Bush did it dodge. I recommend others do it, it was funny what happened next. They go into wild rage when you laugh.
tarpon on August 3, 2010 at 11:23 AM
O/T…
voting today in Michigan, the dems have two candidates running to replace Granholm as Gov. One is running on the saved/created canard. Funny stuff.
booter on August 3, 2010 at 11:25 AM
ZERO, not a single solitary one of them. Their heads are so up up their butt, they need a glass naval to see out.
UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on August 3, 2010 at 11:32 AM
Can’t wait for election night coverage, November 2, 2010. Liberal talking heads will be exploding.
GrannyDee on August 3, 2010 at 11:45 AM
indeed :)
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 11:57 AM
Obama:
Is he high? His administration is nothing but a retread of the New Deal/Great Society, and he says the Rs are rehashing ideas? Maybe he should try reading Paul Ryan’s roadmap before flapping his yap. (Of course, that would require Obama to actually work at his job….)
irishspy on August 3, 2010 at 12:06 PM
I will always suspect that the late 2008 financial crisis was caused by George Soros and his crony cabal as an October election surprise. The Chuckie Schumer-induced bank run on IndyMac looks like a failed first attempt. The second time they got it right.
Throw away a couple trillion dollars to ensure the election of a socialist president? To the progressives that’s an easy decision. Win by legislation or Cloward-Piven, they don’t care which it is.
slickwillie2001 on August 3, 2010 at 12:14 PM
It’s all they had to run with,and it isn’t going to work.
90 days to the midterms.
rayra on August 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM
Just the other day I saw a poll, I think it was Rasmussens that put blame on Bush at 47% and Obama at 48%. I think that is right. At any rate, I am not sure a majority still blame Bush. I think a lot of people blame Congress and the Democrats have controlled Congress for a number of years now. Also, the economy was pretty good during most of Bush’s term.
Terrye on August 3, 2010 at 1:23 PM
I’d like to see an investigation of the 2008 meltdown. Who moved all that money out of the money market funds? This should be on the new republican house’s agenda come early 2011.
trigon on August 3, 2010 at 1:31 PM
This must be a Dem poll. When Rasmussen asked the same question, 47% blamed Bush and 48% blamed Obama, meaning that blaming Bush would have no traction (or slightly negative traction) among Rasmussen’s sample.
When the financial crisis hit in late September 2008, Senators Obama and Biden went merrily around the country blaming Bush for “deregulation” (don’t let a crisis go to waste), while McCain went to the Senate to work on the bailout. Neither Bush nor McCain pointed out to the electorate that the bank crisis was caused, not by deregulation, but by OVER-REGULATION put into place during the Clinton Administration which FORCED Fannie and Freddie to lend to insolvent borrowers. So uninformed voters conveniently blamed President Bush, and voted for the candidates from the other party.
As excessive as Bush’s spending policies were during his second term, Obama has increased spending and quadrupled the deficit, and voters will be wondering, WHERE ARE THE JOBS? Why did Obama waste a year on socialized medicine opposed by 55%+ in every poll, while four million people lost their jobs?
Those who want to blame Bush NOW have selective memories–they’re not supposed to remember Obama’s reckless spending, but blame everything on Bush’s second term, but we’re supposed to forget Bush’s FIRST term, when his tax cuts stimulated the economy out of the mini-recession after the dot.com bust, and revived the economy from both the 9/11 disaster and the Enron / WorldCom bankruptcies.
Republican Congressional candidates need to remind voters that WITHOUT congressional action in 2011, taxes WILL RISE automatically due to the “sunsetting” of the 2003 tax cuts (passed under BushBushBushBushBush) imposed by DEMOCRATS. Voters need to elect a Republican majority, not so much to “cut” taxes, but to maintain the status quo! A Democrat majority in Congress means a return to the failed tax policies of the CLINTON past. A return to a 55% death tax–let’s ask the heir of a small business whether he wants to run the business when Dad passes away, or lay off the employees and split the business with the Government.
Dems want to talk about BushBushBushBushBush? Let’s tell the voters that Democrats want to take away all those middle-class tax breaks BushBushBushBushBush gave them up until this year. By 2011, taxpayers will REALLY miss Bush, and all the money he saved them!
Steve Z on August 3, 2010 at 2:03 PM
The old way of thinking is to but fires out with water, but sometimes this doesent work as well as we would like it to.
Lets try a “New Way of Thinking” and use Gasoline.
You Betcha!
SayNo2-O on August 3, 2010 at 3:39 PM
Yep, lets make sure the public remembers the “Bush Policies”
ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/lf/aa2006/aat1.txt
2001 4.7 71,359
2003 6.0 74,658
2004 5.5 75,956
2005 5.1 76,762
2006 4.6 77,387
Worst year with Bush and Rep Congress
2003, unemployment 6.0%
Best year with Bush and Rep Congress
2006, unemployment 4.6%
2007 4.6 78,743
2008 5.8 79,501
2009 9.3 81,659
Worst year with Bush and Dem Congress
2008, unemployment 5.8%
Best year with Bush and Dem Congress
2007, unemployment 4.6%
Note: this is the start of the Dem takeover. Half the year was wasted on Dem patting themselves on the back. After that its all down hill.
Worst/Best year with Obama and Dem Congress
2009, unemployment 9.3%
Yep, lets make sure the public remembers the “Bush Policies”
With Bush Unemployment 4.53 avg
DSchoen on August 3, 2010 at 3:54 PM
nice post :)
cmsinaz on August 3, 2010 at 4:14 PM
I love the postings on this thread. So many of you guys have re-portrayed BushBushBushBushBush in a manner that the mainstream meme doesn’t acknowledge and never wants to consider.
Perhaps we don’t defend BushBushBushBushBush like we should, simply because by the end he was indefensible (and he certainly had given up defending himself.)
But for 6 years, give or take one or two major mis-reads, he embodied many of the conservative ideals we believe in. He expressed our views clearly, if inarticulately, and Americans rallied to him because of it.
I firmly believe that most Americans would not think seriously about voting for a liberal Presidential candidate. On the other hand, most cannot tell a lie from a misstatement, a failure to speak correctly from a failure to act adequately, a lack of understanding of the values that make our country great from a lack of courtesy in calling out such incompetence. Tax-paying Americans only elect liberals when conservatives fail to draw the contrasts clearly. But our candidates allow themselves to be drawn into minor comparisons when our differences should be so vast! And the argument is further compromised by the fact that, thanks to BushBushBushBushBush, only 51% of American adults even pay income taxes anymore, so just winning over the tax-payers won’t win elections anymore.
The election of Barack Obama was a two-fer, and smart money knew it all along even if we fought it. Many independent voters figured “1) this country needs to be united going forward, and these Dems are so rabidly anti-Bush that they will never unite with a working mainstream. Therefore, if we’re ever going to unite this country, it must be under liberal leadership, and this is as good a time as any to let them try their hand. After all, things certainly can’t get any worse!” and 2) It’s probably time for a minority to be given a chance to lead us, so we can all feel good about ourselves and continue to expect minorities to contribute to our country’s greatness. Now is as good a time as any to make the ultimate American ambition possible for all races.
So America the Fair elected the first publicly-elected racial minority as Head of State in the history of–what? Western Civ? the World? or just the US? IDK, but I hope one of you will clarify it for me.
In retrospect, the American voter was doing us a favor–looking at our candidate, our history, our weakness in dealing with the Left, our spending track record, and our minor ethics lapses vs. their ability to downplay their failures, their ability to control the conversation, their ability to forget their own failings, and their unapologetic panderings to the culture of corruption and self-interest at the expense of the rest; then getting bonus points for feeling good about themselves by giving a minority candidate an opportunity to succeed even though it would surely cost us something while he got up to speed; how could a pragmatic independent NOT vote for Obama in 2008?
It is up to us to make sure they realize that the cost far exceeded the value, that the Dem failure to act in the best interest of our taxpayers does disqualify them from leading. The mid-term slaughter of 2010 is a natural outgrowth of these developments. It’s up to us to make sure voters have a true choice in 2012.
rwenger43 on August 3, 2010 at 6:56 PM