Palin: Obama lacks a certain something

posted at 10:55 am on August 2, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Sarah Palin tells Fox News that Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has something that President Barack Obama lacks when it comes to border enforcement:

George H. W. Bush got tagged with the “wimp factor” both before he ran for President and again once in office.  The man who piloted a fighter plane in World War II and fashioned a vast coalition to drive Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait had trouble standing up to domestic opposition at key points.  Bush 41 acquiesced to a tax hike instead of standing fast for spending cuts on their own, and wound up getting beat for re-election by Bill Clinton, with a big assist from Ross Perot.

The problem here isn’t a wimp factor, or even a cojones factor, though.  That would imply that Obama wants to get serious about immigration-law enforcement at all, which he and his party clearly do not.  They want another general amnesty in order to (a) pander to the existing Latino vote, and (b) expand voter rolls in the near future to add a lot of grateful recipients to Democratic rolls.  Along the way, they wouldn’t mind picking up the support of businesses who rely on cheap illegal-immigrant labor, too.

The recent surge in support for stronger enforcement has stymied that effort, which Democrats had previously thought would split the Republicans and give them a path to victory in the midterms.  Instead, their attack on Arizona has an already-unhappy electorate even more angry, and immigration may well end up burying them for another cycle.  In addition, the Latinos they courted are even more unhappy now that it’s clear Democrats won’t move as promised on another amnesty package.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Wait a tic, saying “jackass” and “kick ass” is not juvenile, but saying “cojones” is? What?

di butler on August 2, 2010 at 2:18 PM

What? Something you’d say when you’re really REALLY ticked off at ________________ when ______________ takes advantage of you by doing ______________ to you.

Yeah, in that context too. Don’t wanna get banned by giving specific examples ;).

ProudPalinFan on August 2, 2010 at 3:24 PM

Bradky on August 2, 2010 at 12:07 PM. Nice try. Go back and try again. Who knows, you might come up with a more effective counter to Gov. Palin’s devastating take down of Obama.

No cojones, indeed. Once again, showing her own brass cojones, Gov. Palin has boxed in Teh Won. If he acts decisively on immigration in the way that he wants, he loses cuz he likes his aliens illegal and voters have had enough. If he does not act, he proves her point.

I saw the interview, and Gov. Palin said what she did with deliberate intent. Her voice and everything said intent. What’s Obama gonna do now? Is he gonna show her his? Kinda hard for a castrati to show his, yer know.

SilentWatcher on August 2, 2010 at 3:27 PM

Please stop that damn popup.

Partisan on August 2, 2010 at 11:31 AM

Firefox with Adblock Plus works for me!

Note to Ed and AllahP, I make a point of clicking on the in-page ads to make up for blocking the pop-ups. And when the in-page ad is from some stinkin’ liberal, I click even more, ‘cuz I love, love, love the idea of making the liberals’ money your money! :-)

Mary in LA on August 2, 2010 at 3:36 PM

cartooner on August 2, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Obama is not tackling difficult issues. He’s disregarding the Constitution and ramming his communist agenda down our throats. Dubya tackled the difficult issues of SS and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Democrats ignored him then, led by Obama, proceeded to destroy the U.S. economy. Ramming stuff through is easy to do when you have a communist congress marching in lockstep with you.

SilentWatcher on August 2, 2010 at 3:39 PM

She could’ve said “courage” instead of “balls”. Our culture is in the pits.

Paul-Cincy on August 2, 2010 at 12:38 PM

Oh grow up Nancy. Had she said “courage: or “guts” no one would have listened or cared. Saying he has no cojones assured that EVERYONE, supporter or enemy, would be talking about it for days. As others have said, she is a genius at this stuff.

Also, as others have said, where are the GOP show ponies on this? Oh, that’s right, Romnesty weighed in a few days ago didn’t he! Romnesty/Gramnesty 2012 anyone?

gary4205 on August 2, 2010 at 3:43 PM

Watch Univision’s 6:30 newscast. Bet they will play it…

LurkerDood on August 2, 2010 at 3:49 PM

Palin leads the attack, leads in policy statements, leads in support of other conservatives…she is a leader.
Meanwhile, the others just sit back hoping she will implode…so they can move in and fill the vacuum.
That isn’t leadership…we need a leader, and leaders do make mistakes, they do misstep, they make decisions…and not all decisions work out perfectly, but they lead with conviction.
She is the only one doing that right now…the only one.

right2bright on August 2, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Marry me, baby! As long as you’re not a girl, of course!

SilentWatcher on August 2, 2010 at 3:50 PM

She could’ve said “courage” instead of “balls”. Our culture is in the pits.

Paul-Cincy on August 2, 2010 at 12:38 PM

Thanks for playing, Dan Rather.

Norwegian on August 2, 2010 at 3:51 PM

right2bright on August 2, 2010 at 11:53 AM

guts, cojones, whatever you call it is a subjective description not a “fact”.
Want to win people over who may have voted for Obama? Then I suggest it is done with more finesse and depth than with approaches like that.

Bradky on August 2, 2010 at 11:58 AM

So what you’re saying is, Palin is taking a chance applying that term in that way to the current president.

She’s willing to take risks. I think I like that….

tom on August 2, 2010 at 4:34 PM

I bring this just to make trolls squeal in disgust. From Wikipedia (emphasis mine):

Sarah was the wife of Abraham, being the granddaughter of his father Terah (Genesis 20:12). The Talmud [2] identifies Sarai with Iscah, daughter of Abraham’s deceased brother Haran (Genesis 11:29), so that Sarah turns out to be the niece of Abraham and the sister of Lot and Milcah.

She was so beautiful that all other persons seemed apes in comparison.[3] Even the hardships of her journey with Abraham did not affect her beauty.[4] She was superior to Abraham in the gift of prophecy.

[5] She was the “crown” of her husband; and he obeyed her words because he recognized her superiority.[6] She was the only woman whom God deemed worthy to be addressed by Him directly, all the other prophetesses receiving their revelations through angels (ib. xlv. 14).

She was originally called “Sarai”. Later she was called “Sarah” i.e., princess” because she was the princess of her house and of her tribe.

ProudPalinFan on August 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM

Mary in LA on August 2, 2010 at 2:47 PM

Thanks Mary. Appreciate that.

Bradky on August 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM

What’s Obama gonna do now? Is he gonna show her his? Kinda hard for a castrati to show his, yer know.

SilentWatcher on August 2, 2010 at 3:27 PM

Nothing I hope. He is the president and just as he went after Rush, he shouldn’t respond to a comment from her.

Something about acting presidential. But if she has real aspirations, which no one knows for sure at this point, I’d hope she would show that she is better than that….

Call me old school

Bradky on August 2, 2010 at 4:43 PM

She’s willing to take risks. I think I like that….

tom on August 2, 2010 at 4:34 PM

Exercising free speech is not very risky if you ask me. The same could be said about Obama’s comments about bitter gun clingers.
Stupid of him then – not very well thought out by her now.

Bradky on August 2, 2010 at 4:49 PM

Marry me, baby! As long as you’re not a girl, of course!

SilentWatcher on August 2, 2010 at 3:50 PM

Watch out what you wish for…someone did that 41 years ago, and she is ready to put me in the mark down bin….and no I am not a girl, I looked and I have cajones…

right2bright on August 2, 2010 at 4:57 PM

Rush really started this last week when he said that when Bammie went on the View the average estrogen level in the room went up.

He really is a very prissy man-child.

slickwillie2001 on August 2, 2010 at 4:57 PM

Sarah was the wife of Abraham, being the granddaughter of his father Terah (Genesis 20:12). The Talmud [2] identifies Sarai with Iscah, daughter of Abraham’s deceased brother Haran (Genesis 11:29), so that Sarah turns out to be the niece of Abraham and the sister of Lot and Milcah.

She was so beautiful that all other persons seemed apes in comparison.[3] Even the hardships of her journey with Abraham did not affect her beauty.[4] She was superior to Abraham in the gift of prophecy.

[5] She was the “crown” of her husband; and he obeyed her words because he recognized her superiority.[6] She was the only woman whom God deemed worthy to be addressed by Him directly, all the other prophetesses receiving their revelations through angels (ib. xlv. 14).

She was originally called “Sarai”. Later she was called “Sarah” i.e., princess” because she was the princess of her house and of her tribe.

ProudPalinFan on August 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM

Taking crazy to a whole new level.

Hope you didn’t have any harsh words for the Obama drones during the campaign.

You-Eh-Vee on August 2, 2010 at 4:58 PM

Bradky on August 2, 2010 at 4:49 PM

ummmmm….hate to break this to you, but you were being made fun of, your chain was being jerked.

Exercising free speech is not very risky if you ask me

Imagine, if that were true, founders of the states, MLK, so many risking their lives so others could have that one thing that “is not very risky”…
Sorry, she took a risk, and by your reaction is was a home run…

right2bright on August 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM

Taking crazy to a whole new level.

Hope you didn’t have any harsh words for the Obama drones during the campaign.

You-Eh-Vee on August 2, 2010 at 4:58 PM

Well, you know, you just look up her name and that’s what it means? Gee whiz, harsh doesn’t even cut it when it comes to “el Presidente que no tiene cojones ni liderato en “su país de origen”/tin foil hat off.

He divides in order to conquer. Sarah Palin unites in order for America to prosper. Dunno, it doesn’t take too much to see where you want this US of A go to, eh? You know his speech this afternoon was good, got the troops going and all which I am for; but then you fine-tune your ear and you hear these lies? Undocumented, not fact-checked/sarc news about how the VA is working and being transformed-and nobody has actually checked on this?

Me thinks Ed and Allah better team up and fact-check what the POTUS said this afternoon about the VA overall. The last thing you want right now is for veterans w/o the help they need based on promises that are empty.

ProudPalinFan on August 2, 2010 at 5:16 PM

Sarah has the cojones that Mittens lacks.

Go Sarah! Palin 2012!

Mr Purple on August 2, 2010 at 5:39 PM

Jenfidel has the cojones that BradKYjelly lacks

Mr Purple on August 2, 2010 at 5:42 PM

Mr Purple places his cojones on BradKYjelly’s forehead.

Mr Purple on August 2, 2010 at 5:43 PM

Go Sarah Go!

CA_Conservative on August 2, 2010 at 5:47 PM

The Lefty trolls will be stamping their little footsies and wringing their little hands over on DU and Huffpo….

SunSword on August 2, 2010 at 6:16 PM

I think I am in love.

lavell12 on August 2, 2010 at 6:34 PM

The recent surge in support for stronger enforcement has stymied that effort, which Democrats had previously thought would split the Republicans and give them a path to victory in the midterms. Instead, their attack on Arizona has an already-unhappy electorate even more angry, and immigration may well end up burying them for another cycle. In addition, the Latinos they courted are even more unhappy now that it’s clear Democrats won’t move as promised on another amnesty package.

“Now that it’s clear Democrats won’t move as promised on another amnesty package”…

Don’t count chicken security before they hatch.

Since when has Obama’s Democratic Congress accomplished ANYTHING legitimately?

They didn’t even bother VOTING on ObamaCare.

We can’t pat ourselves on the back because we are in the right while Obama pulls the rug out from under us.

maverick muse on August 2, 2010 at 6:35 PM

Yeah, he’s lacking a soul Sarah. Don’t be afraid to say it.

ButterflyDragon on August 2, 2010 at 6:38 PM

I laughed out loud when Saracuda dropped the “Spanish lingo” on Fox News Sunday!!

SO true!!

Khun Joe on August 2, 2010 at 7:05 PM

Run and hide? really? How interesting.
Can you cite the source of the 100% claim you are using?

Bradky on August 2, 2010 at 12:43 PM

Yeah, you’re really one for citing sources.

ddrintn on August 2, 2010 at 7:36 PM

She is terrific! She slices and dices with a smile and does it so easily and on so many different levels!
Everyone gets it that the Cuda called the wanna be bully a sniveling little punk and dared him to hit the girl.
Dared him to do his duty and protect the borders.

dhunter on August 2, 2010 at 7:36 PM

Exercising free speech is not very risky if you ask me. The same could be said about Obama’s comments about bitter gun clingers.
Stupid of him then – not very well thought out by her now.

Bradky on August 2, 2010 at 4:49 PM

Umm, not really. One remark is a slam on an entire demographic group. The other is a slam against a government official’s half-assed enforcement of fed immigration law, as well as essentially going to legal war with one of the states. I see analogies aren’t your strong suit.

ddrintn on August 2, 2010 at 7:38 PM

I perceive a cultist.

Perceptron on August 2, 2010 at 12:24 PM

I percieve a troll attack on an effective supporter of Govenor Palin…

CCRWM on August 2, 2010 at 8:11 PM

Sarah has the cojones that Mittens lacks.

Go Sarah! Palin 2012!

Mr Purple on August 2, 2010 at 5:39 PM

Well, I like the term mujones (mujer + cojones), but I think we’ve already established in these fine pages that they’re either Malkins or Thatchers.

:-)

Mary in LA on August 2, 2010 at 8:27 PM

Well, she knows how to fight.

I want that in a nominee, whether it’s her or someone she backs.

tigerinexile on August 2, 2010 at 8:32 PM

Sarah has found a clever way to emasculate the mojo of the Messiah, if you know what I mean and in such a way that Obama will be constantly self-consciousness of or on the alert to whether American citizens will still consider him a man or not.

technopeasant on August 2, 2010 at 8:59 PM

Right. The half-term quitter walks away from elected office, snipes from behind the safety of her Facebook/Twitter/FNC firewall and accuses Obama of having no balls!

Doonesbury has it right:

“Her brain is empty. Sarah’s a dummy…not a thought in her head…just a piece of plastic crap.”

Please! Please let QuitterCuda be the the GO(B)P candidate in 2012! Please!

chumpThreads on August 2, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Like a lot of what Palin says, you wonder why it hasn’t been said before. Then you realize — no one else had the cojones.

rrpjr on August 2, 2010 at 9:22 PM

This is silly talk and decidedly unpresidential.

Does Palin derive her strength from her own ovaries? Are they then fair-targets upon which to base professional-scrutiny or insults?

It’s sad to watch someone who has dealt with sexist depictions and insults willingly hurl the same crap.

The Race Card on August 2, 2010 at 9:31 PM

It’s sad to watch someone who has dealt with sexist depictions and insults willingly hurl the same crap.

The Race Card on August 2, 2010 at 9:31 PM

It’s not sexist: Sarah proclaimed that Jan Brewer had cojones and NObama did not.
So “having cojones” is no respecter of sex.
We all know she’s talking about political guts, not male sexual organs.
It’s an expression, trolls!
Get over yourselves.
(BTW, Karl Rove would criticize this, because he’s not a Palin fan and is working for either Mittens or Jeb to be the 2012 GOP candidate.)

Jenfidel on August 2, 2010 at 9:34 PM

Looks like everyone is starting to use that language:

“The blame is on representatives in Congress for being so flaccid on the issue, and they continue not to fund the deportation of illegal immigrants in this country.”

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/08/illegal-immigrant-awaiting-deportation-charged-with-killing-nun-in-car-crash/

texasconserv on August 2, 2010 at 9:39 PM

ProudPalinFan on August 2, 2010 at 5:16 PM

Yeah whatever.

You just quoted completely scripture to make a political point. All because they share the same…name?

You’re nuts.

You-Eh-Vee on August 2, 2010 at 9:40 PM

You’re nuts.

You-Eh-Vee on August 2, 2010 at 9:40 PM

Don’t attack people for their faith!
PPF isn’t “nuts;” they’re just devout and cling to their Bibles.
Why is that a problem for you?

Jenfidel on August 2, 2010 at 9:51 PM

The Axleturd is strong in this thread.

Inanemergencydial on August 2, 2010 at 9:53 PM

For those who just don’t get it; (and you know who you are…

1. She has owned another news cycle (at least on the conservative side) by coining or using a unique turn of phrase. She’s done this before.
2. Each of these events leaks out a little further into the liberal-controlled media. As the constancy of these continues, it’s harder for the media and the punditocracy to ignore her, or dismiss her.
3. By using harsh, or impolite language, she makes her point starkly. [Think: Iron Curtain: Evil Empire: Death Panels:]

massrighty on August 2, 2010 at 10:02 PM

I’ve said on here for a long time Sarah has more balls than the LA Lakers, maybe more than the entire NBA and certainly more than Obama or the other Repub wannabees.

And just for the trolls I’m NOT talkin about the ones between ones legs!

She has GUTS, and for any troll bait or presstitute whore to try to make this thing sexist shows more about where they are at than where Sarah is.

Its exactly the same tools that have no problem callin Tea party Patriots Rascists or TeaBaggers that try to portray this as unbecoming of Sarah.

Stupid sexist, racist, lefty trolls own the language AND the behavior they try to subscribe to Sarah!

dhunter on August 2, 2010 at 10:17 PM

It’s sad to watch someone who has dealt with sexist depictions and insults willingly hurl the same crap.

The Race Card on August 2, 2010 at 9:31 PM

To say “You ain’t got the balls to ______” is sexist now? My, my. You need a scorecard to keep up.

ddrintn on August 2, 2010 at 10:27 PM

Don’t attack people for their faith!
PPF isn’t “nuts;” they’re just devout and cling to their Bibles.
Why is that a problem for you?

Jenfidel on August 2, 2010 at 9:51 PM

Huh?

I’m not attacking her faith. In fact, I’m a believer. What I’m attacking is the parallel she’s drawing from a completely unrelated passage of the Bible.

It’s like me saying that David Petraeus is great because a similar named guy the King of Israel.

It’s just…weird. And wrong.

You-Eh-Vee on August 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM

It’s like me saying that David Petraeus is great candiate because of a similar named guy became the King of Israel.

Can’t spell tonight.

Anyways, I’m outta here. Have a good night.

You-Eh-Vee on August 2, 2010 at 10:40 PM

as Rush pointed out repeatedly today……the “cajones” comment is nothing new……AND THE DEMS IN 2008 were saying it during the campaign about the DOTUS to be.

Shall we even go down the list of all of the “stupidly” said things of the genius DOTUS and his brilliant Joe Biden?

Surely by now there is a site that chronicles all of the “brilliance” of the Ruling Class Duo we have in D.C.

PappyD61 on August 2, 2010 at 10:40 PM

chumpThreads on August 2, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Speaking of someone who snipes from behind the safety of his comic strip . . . Doonesbury? Seriously? You’re going to use Gary Trudeau as proof that Palin is “plastic crap”? Maybe a guy whose wife has a mental illness shouldn’t be making fun of other women. If Trudeau has a problem with Sarah Palin, maybe he should be man enough to take it up with Todd Palin.

But he won’t, because just like Obama, Gary Trudeau lacks the cojones.

NebCon on August 2, 2010 at 10:54 PM

It’s like me saying that David Petraeus is great because a similar named guy the King of Israel.

It’s just…weird. And wrong.

You-Eh-Vee on August 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM

No, it’s neither weird nor wrong.
You have no idea whether or not Petraeus’s parents named him David after King David because of their Bible-based beliefs or not.
Until the recent trend of made-up Hollywood and AA names took hold, this was how people traditionally chose the names of their children–from the Bible.

Jenfidel on August 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM

She’s just darn fun. It’s refreshing.

AnninCA on August 2, 2010 at 11:34 PM

I think the choice of language was deliberate. Using a Spanish word in a discussion of the immigration issue that has multiple connotations. PR brilliance. People forget Palin was a journalism major.

txmomof6 on August 2, 2010 at 11:35 PM

The Race Card on August 2, 2010 at 9:31 PM

She isn’t President. She is a private citizen.

When she is POTUS, I’m sure she will know ‘who’s ass to kick’ if she says something unPresidential.

Mr Purple on August 2, 2010 at 11:37 PM

The Race Card on August 2, 2010 at 9:31 PM

The Race Card similarly lacks cojones, as he backed down from a ‘meet-up’ that The Race Card suggested.

The Race Card said he wanted to fight and offered to meet me at a halfway point anywhere in the country. When I accepted, the Race Card then decided I must make the entire trip – and we must fight in a gym of his choosing with gloves and headgear and all sorts of other girly man protection.

Mr Purple doesn’t fight using gloves (or rules for that matter). When informed of my style, The Race Card ran away from the thread and never contacted me again – even though I had left an e-mail address for him to contact me at.

HA posters with no cojones shouldn’t comment in ‘cojones’ threads lest your lack of cojones be revealed.

Mr Purple on August 2, 2010 at 11:47 PM

Oh please, the entire world knows that Obama isn’t going to really address the border issue.

The only thing that Sarah made overt was that the entire Homeland Security junk is just that……a junky waste of tax dollars.

AnninCA on August 3, 2010 at 12:59 AM

Blame Bush again?

Obowma can only blame the mom jeans he wears, remember that MLB All-star pitch?

dthorny on August 3, 2010 at 3:04 AM

Wonder what Palin’s use of the word “cojones” will have on the Latino community? It is, after all, a Spanish word, and Latinos know what it means!
Steve Z on August 2, 2010 at 11:22 AM

Cojones means “balls”. I think the Latino community knows exactly what she was talking about.

She was talking about his “gonads” and “gonads” applies to BOTH male and female.

The female gonads produce female gametes (eggs);
the male gonads produce male gametes (sperm).

In females the gonads are the ovaries
In males male the gonads are the testicles.

Thanks for playing advanced Trivia!

DSchoen on August 3, 2010 at 4:28 AM

She was talking about his “gonads” and “gonads” applies to BOTH male and female.

DSchoen on August 3, 2010 at 4:28 AM

Which Sarah has in spades: five kids–and she labored with number five on a plane so she could deliver him at home, in Alaska.

The lefties on this board do not understand her, but they fear her. I can smell the fear wafting off my computer…can’t you?

Grace_is_sufficient on August 3, 2010 at 7:07 AM

The lefties on this board do not understand her, but they fear her. I can smell the fear wafting off my computer…can’t you?

Grace_is_sufficient on August 3, 2010 at 7:07 AM

Some may fear her, because they understand her words are a direct reflection of the sentiment of the American people. Some are just too stupid to understand what’s going on … believing the standard progressive talking point that most of America is populated by dumb, redneck hicks who cling bitterly to their guns and religion.

In actuality, the progressive followers are the dumb hicks … brainwashed by years of indoctrination and political correctness to the point they cannot think for themselves. They simply don’t, and can’t understand simple concepts as equality and national sovereignty. They’ve been trained to view everything through the lens of race and victimhood.

Palin angers them because they just don’t understand what she, and the rest of America are saying.

darwin on August 3, 2010 at 9:00 AM

Jenfidel on August 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM

What on earth are you talking about?

We’re talking about shared qualities, not what their parents named them after. The previous poster quoted scripture to support a political candidate. Not to argue the fact their parents may or may not have named them after someone in the Bible.

Propping up a candidate because they share the same name of a Bible character is a stretch to say the least. With that stupid logic, I could prop up John Kerry because he may or many not be named after John the Baptist.

But keep on pretending that I’m attacking her faith, or whatever.

You-Eh-Vee on August 3, 2010 at 11:48 AM

The previous poster quoted scripture to support a political candidate.

You-Eh-Vee on August 3, 2010 at 11:48 AM

So what?
If that’s what gives them comfort and joy, who are you to say it’s “wrong” in your narrow view?

Jenfidel on August 3, 2010 at 6:46 PM

Jenfidel on August 2, 2010 at 9:34 PM

The term is sexist in its origins.

Try to look at this in a different way. If Obama spoke of Palin’s chi-chis or lack thereof as determinant of her professional ability you would lose your cookies, rightfully so. Both cojones and chichis Americanized Spanish-slang referring to gender-specific parts of the reproductive system.

Imagine if Obama made a similar remark during dinner time. Imagine if he had said the chichis thing about Palin over dinner and your daughter heard it. Imagine that. You would go effing nuts!!!

This was not a bright move. IMNSHO she acted stupidly. Said term is vulgar and using it makes her appear dismissive of Spanish-speakers. Snark won’t solve a problem ignored by Congress for the past few decades.

I do think it’s funny that Palin chose this episode to drop her Spanglish on us.

The Race Card on August 4, 2010 at 5:49 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3