Q2 GDP: 2.4%

posted at 8:49 am on July 30, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The Commerce Department announced that the advance estimate of economic growth in the second quarter fell to a 2.4% annualized rate, down from a “real” GDP rate of 3.7%.  The slowdown came across a broad swath of the economy, with most indicators reduced but still positive in Q2:

Real gross domestic product — the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States — increased at an annual rate of 2.4 percent in the second quarter of 2010, (that is, from the first quarter to the second quarter), according to the “advance” estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the first quarter, real GDP increased 3.7 percent. …

The increase in real GDP in the second quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from nonresidential fixed investment, exports, personal consumption expenditures, private inventory investment, federal government spending, and residential fixed investment. Imports, which are a
subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased.

The deceleration in real GDP in the second quarter primarily reflected an acceleration in imports and a deceleration in private inventory investment that were partly offset by an upturn in residential fixed investment, an acceleration in nonresidential fixed investment, an upturn in state and local government spending, and an acceleration in federal government spending.

What went up, and what went down? Auto sales went negative by a slight amount (0.01%) after being up a bit in Q1 (0.74%).  Most everything else stayed in positive growth territory, but less so than in the previous quarter:

  • Computers: +0.04%, Q1 +2.1%
  • Price index on domestic purchases: +0.1%, Q1 +2.1%
  • Durable goods sales: +7.5%, Q1 +8.8%
  • Nondurable goods: +1.6%, Q1 +4.2%
  • Personal consumption: +1.6%, Q1 +1.9%

Inventory management comprised less of the growth figure in Q2:

The change in real private inventories added 1.05 percentage points to the second-quarter change in real GDP after adding 2.64 percentage points to the first-quarter change. Private businesses increased inventories $75.7 billion in the second quarter, following an increase of $44.1 billion in the first quarter and a decrease of $36.7 billion in the fourth.

The big area of quarter-on-quarter growth came from government spending, however:

Real federal government consumption expenditures and gross investment increased 9.2 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 1.8 percent in the first. National defense increased 7.4 percent, compared with an increase of 0.4 percent. Nondefense increased 13.0 percent, compared with an increase of 5.0 percent. Real state and local government consumption expenditures and gross investment increased 1.3 percent, in contrast to a decrease of 3.8 percent.

Without the government spending, Q2 would have looked pretty bad, it appears — and that spending bubble is nearing its end. It still leaves the private economy moribund. A decline in the growth rate does not bode well for the rest of the year, and this certainly won’t have employers leaping back into the kind of expansion needed to create massive amounts of new jobs.

Update: Reuters reports that “U.S. economic growth slowed more than expected.”  Just another form of its favorite adverb.

Update II: It seems pretty clear why Joe Biden has been out touting “Recovery Summer”; the administration expected all of this new government spending in the second quarter to save their bacon on the economy.  Obviously, that’s working as well as Biden’s Chip Diller imitation.

This is a political disaster for Democrats.  There’s no way to spin a 2.4% GDP rate as a positive step in a recovery.  Worse yet, the pattern has been to revise these numbers downwards when Commerce firms up its data.  The next statement of Q2 GDP will come on August 27, just before Congress comes back in session and right at the prime time of summer campaign season, just a week before Labor Day.  If this drops much lower in the next iteration, Democrats will have to explain the failure of their economic program to angry voters across the nation — and they’re not going to want to hear “It’s Bush’s fault!” two years after electing Obama and four years after giving Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid control of Congress.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

To be revised downward enda next week…

Akzed on July 30, 2010 at 8:53 AM

Wonder if this’ll be revised up for a change?

Canadian Infidel on July 30, 2010 at 8:53 AM

Until they revise it down!

tim c on July 30, 2010 at 8:53 AM

Shocking!

But let’s all remember it could have been 1.4, so, you know, thank you’s are in order.

B Man on July 30, 2010 at 8:54 AM

Update: Reuters reports that “U.S. economic growth slowed more than expected.” Just another form of its favorite adverb.

Yeah, they are wearing “unexpectedly” out.

Guardian on July 30, 2010 at 8:54 AM

I’ll wait for the adjusted figures in about a month.

jbh45 on July 30, 2010 at 8:56 AM

Thank God for that $787B stimulus. That was definitely money well spent.

I just love our “Recovery Summer”!

Blegh.

Chris of Rights on July 30, 2010 at 8:56 AM

The worst is yet to arrive. Obama’s burning through valueless monies has only stoked the hostile fire that will decimate the economy much further the next few years. He golf’s while we burn.

ray on July 30, 2010 at 8:58 AM

We really should be scared. There doesn’t seem to be a new bubble, eg tech, housing, in the near future. The clowns in DC will kill any growth with tax increases. The next two years could be comparatively brutal with the last five years.

TimTebowSavesAmerica on July 30, 2010 at 8:58 AM

Color me surprised.

MainelyRight on July 30, 2010 at 8:59 AM

Call it 1.2,
After the next revision.
They always miss high…

Haiku Guy on July 30, 2010 at 9:00 AM

The economy will not recover as people & businesses will not spend until the Fascist-Democrats are out of office. From Dear Liar on down.

Not until 2013 will it really be a recovery. There might be a stabilization, with a “just poking along” economy until then, but no real solid growth.

rbj on July 30, 2010 at 9:00 AM

This is a political disaster for Democrats. There’s no way to spin a 2.4% GDP rate as a positive step in a recovery.

and yet, they will with bells on…

cmsinaz on July 30, 2010 at 9:01 AM

Obama, making the great recession into the great depression part two … Just like the Fascist FDR did in the 30s.

Doesn’t anybody go to school anymore?

And when the taxes go up, the economy crashes and burns.

tarpon on July 30, 2010 at 9:01 AM

This bit of economic news is brought to you by Capt. Renault Electric – We will constantly shock, SHOCK you.

steveegg on July 30, 2010 at 9:02 AM

a public option would have saved us!

rob verdi on July 30, 2010 at 9:02 AM

This should tell Krugman and his sycophants that the government is not “the economy” and all the meddling only reduces the ability of the private sector to move forward.

tim c on July 30, 2010 at 9:02 AM

and they’re not going to want to hear “It’s Bush’s fault!” two years after electing Obama and four years after giving Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid control of Congress.

* dear leader stomping his feet*
but it is, it is bush’s fault!

cmsinaz on July 30, 2010 at 9:02 AM

My company has a 0% PC refresh rate for 5 years unless it’s broke, don’t replace it. It has been in effect since early 2009. I’m using a CRT monitor that is ruining my eyes. I think we are encouraged to bring in our own pens and pencils, too!

Let’s all sing together, “These are the good times…”

Mr_Magoo on July 30, 2010 at 9:02 AM

and yet, they will with bells on…

cmsinaz on July 30, 2010 at 9:01 AM

And they’ll claim the bells were made in the US with Stimulus dollars and created 10 American jobs.

Canadian Infidel on July 30, 2010 at 9:02 AM

Green shoots

Weight of Glory on July 30, 2010 at 9:03 AM

Well Obama can always say; without the stimulus it would have been negative 3,000%…….and you should be thanking me it isn’t worse…..

Johnnyreb on July 30, 2010 at 9:05 AM

That 2.4% number was mostly Gov’t spending: Not good. Another thing that bothers me is the 1% revision of the Q1 numbers. How can GDP be revised a whole 1% on the THIRD REVISION! I’m skeptical to say the least.

WisRich on July 30, 2010 at 9:05 AM

Let me put on my “Oh my Gosh!” look.

This was totally unexpected unforeseen, unanticipated, unpredected, surprising startling astonishing sudden, out of the blue, bewildering.

DuctTapeMyBrain on July 30, 2010 at 9:09 AM

How can GDP be revised a whole 1% on the THIRD REVISION! I’m skeptical to say the least.

Democrat math. Just like Obama care will be deficit neutral!

Phil-351 on July 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM

a public option would have saved us!

rob verdi on July 30, 2010 at 9:02 AM

The new “super hero”!!!

ladyingray on July 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM

and they’re not going to want to hear “It’s Bush’s fault!” two years after electing Obama and four years after giving Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid control of Congress.

Sadly, most of the people who voted for Obama probably don’t even know which party controls Congress, or when they began controlling it.

Missy on July 30, 2010 at 9:11 AM

And so Endless Bummer 2010 goes on and on and on and on and….

pilamaye on July 30, 2010 at 9:12 AM

In 1994 the Republicans took control of congress and the economy turned around. They got unemployment under 5.5% and actually produced some balanced budgets. The economy stayed good for over a decade. In 2006 the Dems took over congress and within a year the economy was in the crapper and continued to get worse exponentially until we’re in the place we are now. These dots aren’t that hard to conncet.

tommyboy on July 30, 2010 at 9:13 AM

i can’t believe this

/

blatantblue on July 30, 2010 at 9:15 AM

This is a political disaster for Democrats. There’s no way to spin a 2.4% GDP rate as a positive step in a recovery. Worse yet, the pattern has been to revise these numbers downwards when Commerce firms up its data.

Poll on where the number will be after the first revision?

forest on July 30, 2010 at 9:18 AM

Anyone have the effect of slower growth on the future deficit handy?

tomg51 on July 30, 2010 at 9:18 AM

I dispute this:

There’s no way to spin a 2.4% GDP rate as a positive step in a recovery.

Umm, Obama was out spinning his fabricated “jobs saved or created” yesterday on The View. It is the people’s ignorance, dependence, and quietly desperate faith in this charlatan that emboldens the Administration to make such bald-faced lies.

GTR640 on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

Screw you Ed. no matter what the economic news was, you’d spin it into a negative for obama.

you’re more interested in playing politics than you are in the state of the economy.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

they’re not going to want to hear “It’s Bush’s fault!” two years after electing Obama and four years after giving Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid control of Congress.

But they will hear it.
I think some in the GOP need to distance themselves more from Bush’s spending. Campaign against him. Anyone who didn’t go along with Bush’s liberal traits ought to say so.

itsnotaboutme on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

Canadian infidel– indeed :)

cmsinaz on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

I will not underestimate Obama until he is in a jail cell.

GTR640 on July 30, 2010 at 9:20 AM

Just remember that 47% of Americans pay no taxes and most are on the dole so they really don’t give a care about the GDP, growth, taxes, etc. Just keep them weh-fahe chets comin!

Key West Reader on July 30, 2010 at 9:20 AM

Several of us were having a discussion on this topic over dinner last night.. A left leaning friend tried to take the conversation back to Booooosh; before I could utter a word, my business partner reminded the lefty idiot that her party has been in control of the law making for the past four years. The lefty looked at my partner in shock, and then simply said “you know you’re right, I hadn’t thought of that.”

Stupid people vote Democrat. Just listen to them for a minute and it’s easy to come to that conclusion.

Keemo on July 30, 2010 at 9:22 AM

The inclusion of government spending in GDP is conter-intuitive to me. It is not a product, it is theft.

And it makes Krugman squawk: “More spending, more spending!”

Peri Winkle on July 30, 2010 at 9:23 AM

heh. my 2.4% for 2nd/3rd qtr avg still looking good…the revision up to 3.7 earlier means our rate of descent is faster and the drop farther than EXPECTED. maroons. they are utter maroons. So who is not contributing? consumers, duh. what with the whole lack of a job thing and all. the business expenditures seem to be pushing more productivity, which is already off the charts, no one wants to invest in HUMAN capital thanks to Obamanomics-all those fees.

when they let the tax cuts expire and we hit the air pocket then plummet in ’11 the Keynesians will have no leg left to stand on for hopefully at LEAST another 3 generations

Hold On everybody, it’s a bumpy ride but we can stick it out!

ginaswo on July 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM

Investing in windmills, ethanol, solar panels, electric cars, bad mortgages, caulkers, clunkers, and dubious training is a death spiral.

Things will get worse before they get worse.

tomg51 on July 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

Spin it into negative news for Obama… Wow, proved the point I just made.

Keemo on July 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM

Well,I went for!!
==========================
It will be:
==================

1.88 GNP!
———

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 6:34 PM
==========================================================
==========================================================

We have two winners!!

My guess, to be precise, is they’ll initially announce 2.5%
Archimedes on July 29, 2010 at 2:50 PM

———————–

I’m voting for a real 1.5; which will be reported as a 2.4,
gekkobear on July 29, 2010 at 2:13 PM
——————————

canopfor on July 30, 2010 at 9:28 AM

tomg51
EXCELLENT point. James Bullard voting member of Fed was on Squawk this morning, and he seemed to buy into Pimcos ‘new normal’. when Kiernan asked him about future growth rates, Bullard indicated people may be basing their growth expectations on when we were ‘in a bubble’ and they should expect future growth to be outside those parameters. IOW WASS. once the taxes go up we will be LUCKY to have 2% avg IMO, NO WAY we grow out of a deficit with Obama in charge, Big Dawg did it by growing the pie. Obama is OBSESSED with frakkin pie, yours and mine.

IIRC CBO and O are basing their future deficit projections on ridiculous GDP expectations that will not materialize under his economic plan-we see it already.

Ed-do you have the OMB and CBO projections for GDP in ’11 – ’15? no way are they looking at what Bullard seemed to suggest which I took as a TOP of 3% future growth.

ginaswo on July 30, 2010 at 9:29 AM

heh. my 2.4% for 2nd/3rd qtr avg still looking good

ginaswo on July 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM

ginaswo: Congrats!!:)

canopfor on July 30, 2010 at 9:29 AM

If only they could have passed Cap & Trade, Immigration reform and Card Check these numbers would have been much better…

PatriotRider on July 30, 2010 at 9:31 AM

Screw you Ed. no matter what the economic news was, you’d spin it into a negative for obama.

you’re more interested in playing politics than you are in the state of the economy.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

Seven Seas:

PUT THE KOOL_AID DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

canopfor on July 30, 2010 at 9:32 AM

thanks canopfor, sadly my pick and a token will get me on a bus and thats about it

now if only we could find WORK in this household (laid off again this week :0( , then we would really be cooking with gas!

but we real consumers are not needed for these august individuals who make these deep meaningful economic projections, frakkin maroons I tell ya.

ginaswo on July 30, 2010 at 9:33 AM

This will be revised down when no one’s looking.

Oh wait – well, no one in the Lame Stream has been looking at all for over 18 months now.

HondaV65 on July 30, 2010 at 9:34 AM

This means another awesome speech,
and more stimulus bailout buckaroo’s,

the economy is booming baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

canopfor on July 30, 2010 at 9:34 AM

you’re more interested in playing politics than you are in the state of the economy.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

“This war is going to gain us a lot of Senate seats.”

CDeb on July 30, 2010 at 9:34 AM

But we’ve got… high hopes!!

KGB on July 30, 2010 at 9:35 AM

No one’s really pointed out the fact that Obama’s stimulus was supposed to kick start the economy and give us a minimum of 4% growth rate. Without that growth – we can’t pay for the stimulus. It was also supposed to keep unemployment down below 8 percent.

Now – we have 10 percent unemployment – virtually no growth – and one big waste of TRILLIONS of dollars that we will never be able to tax enough to pay for. So what’s the solution Obama? You obviously don’t know how to grow an economy – so I guess you print money and keep taxing us to pay for your debacle?

MY GOD – WHAT HAVE WE DONE?

HondaV65 on July 30, 2010 at 9:38 AM

Seven Seas:

PUT THE KOOL_AID DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The heck with that. Keep Drinking!

Think strategically.

Bat Chain Puller on July 30, 2010 at 9:38 AM

thanks canopfor, sadly my pick and a token will get me on a bus and thats about it

ginaswo on July 30, 2010 at 9:33 AM

ginaswo:Tru dat,I think Obama is deliberately trying to
tank America’s engine!!

It reminds me,of when OBL,said,he was going to
strike at the heart of America,and,maybe that
heart,is America’s financial engines!!!

canopfor on July 30, 2010 at 9:38 AM

What unexpectishness!

Little Boomer on July 30, 2010 at 9:40 AM

MY GOD – WHAT HAVE WE DONE?

HondaV65 on July 30, 2010 at 9:38 AM

HondaV65:)
=================

Video: “Same As It Ever Was”

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/22/video-same-as-it-ever-was/

canopfor on July 30, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Just wait til 2011 after companies have pulled all the earnings/profits they can into 2010 to avoid taxes coming at them in 2011.This number will look fantastic in retrospect.

txmomof6 on July 30, 2010 at 9:42 AM

They’ll probably readjust the numbers down on a Friday at midnight so no one will notice.

roux on July 30, 2010 at 9:50 AM

Only shocked that it isn’t worse than reported.

The way the Obami are running things, it’s like driving down the freeway one foot on the gas, one foot on the brake and then complaining that the car’s not running right.

Of course, this is proceeding according to plan, right professors Cloward and Piven?

turfmann on July 30, 2010 at 9:50 AM

I called 2.9%. I guess the commerce department couldn’t fake as much as I thought they could.

Will be revised to 1.5% within 3 weeks.

angryed on July 30, 2010 at 9:58 AM

” you’re more interested in playing politics than you are in the state of the economy.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM ”
Bad politics(see Rangle and company) along with looney leftists make BAD economic policy and have since wilson. The folks with the means and talent have gone John Gault but the dolts in DC missed that book and keep on doing stupid. Doing the same thing over and over is INSANE. November.

Col.John Wm. Reed on July 30, 2010 at 10:02 AM

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

When Bush was getting consistent 3.5 to 4.0% GDP growth you were high fibbing everyone right?

angryed on July 30, 2010 at 10:03 AM

Well, well, my antenna yesterday seems to be fairly on tune, as per yesterday’s HotHead poll I chimed in with this prognosis:

“I went with 2% which seems to be the prevailing sentiment thus far amognst the HotHeads, but for my nickel that’ll be the later revised number as they will inevitably try to put lipstick on the pig. My guess, to be precise, is they’ll initially announce 2.5% to cover up the revised number of 1.9%, the revised number never gets the press attention of the initial.

Keep in mind though these #’s aren’t what they used to as the metrics used to quantify have been heavily adjusted/massaged to lean towards a rosier outlook. By the metrics used in say, the 50’s-60’s, we’d probably roll in at 1% or flat.

Archimedes on July 29, 2010 at 2:50 PM”

So far so good, only a 10th of a point off, far better than any of Geithner’s projections to date. Let’s see if the revised number comes as close to predicted 1.9% as well.

Archimedes on July 30, 2010 at 10:07 AM

Screw you Ed. no matter what the economic news was, you’d spin it into a negative for obama.

you’re more interested in playing politics than you are in the state of the economy.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

Instead of throwing around insults at the Captain….maybe you could impress all of us by sharing all this “good economic news” that the Captain is supposedly spinning.

….you know….
…….back up your little tamptrun with some facts.

Baxter Greene on July 30, 2010 at 10:07 AM

There’s no way to spin a 2.4% GDP rate as a positive step in a recovery.

Why not? They have all the fluffers in the MSM to help them. Where is your proof that the sheeple are even paying attention? Lower poll numbers for Democrats in general? The Democrats may be toast for this November, but you can count on every member of the fifth column fourth estate to be working overtime to polish the messiah’s halo for the remainder of his first term. As has been asked before, where else would they go?

Extrafishy on July 30, 2010 at 10:11 AM

MY GOD – WHAT HAVE WE DONE?
HondaV65 on July 30, 2010 at 9:38 AM

We? Are we speaking French? “We” have been deliberately left out of all of this despite our loud protestations. The only difference is that the
“we” here saw it coming, while the 52% were in a state of sexual/political arousal.

I am in agreement with you but this is something that is being done TO us, not something we have consented to.

turfmann on July 30, 2010 at 10:12 AM

Screw you Ed. no matter what the economic news was, you’d spin it into a negative for obama.

you’re more interested in playing politics than you are in the state of the economy.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

Yeah! Screw You, Ed! Reporting bad economic news as if it was bad economic news!

Don’t you know that the skittle-crapping rainbow unicorns will be arriving any minute now?!? Aren’t you going to look stupid when they touch their magic horns to Michelle Obama’s tummy and the GDP jumps by twelve percent ovenight…

Well, don’t say I didn’t warn you!!!

Haiku Guy on July 30, 2010 at 10:16 AM

Seven Seas must be a racist, attacking an innocent white man and all… Next thing you know, Ed will be accused of shouting the N word at a tea party.

Keemo on July 30, 2010 at 10:19 AM

Yeah! Screw You, Ed! Reporting bad economic news as if it was bad economic news!

Don’t you know that the skittle-crapping rainbow unicorns will be arriving any minute now?!? Aren’t you going to look stupid when they touch their magic horns to Michelle Obama’s tummy and the GDP jumps by twelve percent ovenight…

Well, don’t say I didn’t warn you!!!

Haiku Guy on July 30, 2010 at 10:16 AM

Is that a new meter? It sure doesn’t look like any of your prior posts!

Peri Winkle on July 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM

Not to worry, they have a plan !
H/T Zerohedge.

Their solution is to quickly identify all of the borrowers who are making payments on time and send them a one page refi form, which instantly takes their rate to current market. There would be a few other borrower hurdles but not many. The savings to the home owning consumer would be about $45bb per year, more than the cost of the recent extension to unemployment benefits.

Drop your mortgage interest rate to 1.99%. Then buy, buy, buy stuff with the difference. What could go wrong ?

Jeff2161 on July 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM

2.5% gdp growth is not bad news. heck any gdp growth is good news.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM

I voted yesterday for 2.0 % growth followed by a final revision down to 1.0% real growth.

We are really screwed next year.
However, since the capital gains taxes are going to go up next year – the market is going to crash right before the midterms. The only positive in this will be (hopefully) extra push for the Repubs to take over the House.

ghost707 on July 30, 2010 at 10:34 AM

2.5% gdp growth is not bad news. heck any gdp growth is good news.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM

Do you realize how stupid that statement is?
Didn’t think so.

Keemo on July 30, 2010 at 10:47 AM

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM

That’s stupid. While GDP growth is good, it’s hard to imagine how you’d obtain a negative GDP growth when the government is borrowing 41 cents for every dollar it spends. This entire stupid economy is propped up by unsustainable spending. There is nothing to support real economic growth. Can’t see anything coming around the corner that’ll bring it about either.

This is the nature of a top down command and control economy.

lorien1973 on July 30, 2010 at 10:53 AM

The real question is what would the GDP number be without the increases in govt spending. As the govt component is largely just thrown down a giant sink hole, rather than creating lasting productive endeavors, if we subtract out this part, I think we’d see the real number which would be somewhere near 0.5%.

Anybody have that math handy?

Pablo Snooze on July 30, 2010 at 10:54 AM

Anybody have that math handy?

Pablo Snooze on July 30, 2010 at 10:54 AM

It’d probably be negative. Quick math says 2.4% adds about 350 billion to the GDP. Deficit is will over 1.4 trillion.

lorien1973 on July 30, 2010 at 11:02 AM

Without the government spending, Q2 would have looked pretty bad, it appears — and that spending bubble is nearing its end.

I don’t call government spending growth. I’m paying for all of that s***. To me it’s just another bunch of waste.

PackerBronco on July 30, 2010 at 11:09 AM

2.5% gdp growth is not bad news. heck any gdp growth is good news.

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM

…as stated earlier…

….when Bush had 4.5% unemployment……200,000 jobs created a month…..a deficit of 600 billion dollars(Iraq,Afghanistan,Katrina) and GDP levels in the 4-6 range…..democrats called it “a recession”……”a failed economy”.

Now we have over 1.5 trillion dollar deficits……close to 10% unemployment(actually much higher if you add in the hundreds of thousands who have dropped out of the job market)……only tens of thousands of private sector jobs added a month….and GDP growth of 1.5%-2.5%……..

…..and you call this “good news”……

Seven seas here reminds me of Harry Reid:

Senator Harry Reid said, “Today is a big day in America. Only 36,000 people lost their jobs today, which is really good.”

I suppose this is also “good news” to you Seven seas:


Fed: Possibly 5 or 6 years before sustainable growth

Howard Richman, 7/15/2010

According to minutes of the Federal Reserve’s June 22-23 meeting, released on July 14, Federal Reserve officials downgraded the prospects for future U.S. economic growth. Connie Maden reports:
Fed officials expect below normal growth through 2012, and their outlook on unemployment has dipped. They said that it may take as long as five or six years before the economy returns to a longer run sustainable path.

Obama WH gives its economic policies a good, solid F+

posted at 12:15 pm on July 26, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Democrats have been running Congress for nearly four years, and President Obama has been at the White House for 18 months, so it’s not too soon to ask: How’s that working out? One devastating scorecard came out Friday from the White House, in the form of its own semi-annual budget review.


The message: Tax revenues are smaller, spending is greater, and the deficits are thus larger than the White House has been saying. No wonder it dumped the news on the eve of a sweltering mid-July weekend.



CBO BOMB: ‘Deficits will cause debt to rise to unsupportable levels’…

27/07/2010 22:39:00 EducationNews.org
http://www.educationnews.org/breaking_news/96830.html

. With U.S. government debt already at a level that is high by historical standards, and the prospect that, under current policies, federal debt would continue to grow, it is possible that interest rates might rise gradually as investors’ confidence in the U.S. government’s finances declined,

…and the “adults” that are in charge have gone from “Hope and Change” to “it could be worse”…..

Any person with a remote amount of common sense can review all the “Obama is going to change the world”…..”Obama is JFK,FDR,and Lincoln” rolled into one rhetoric, compare it to the reality on the ground today…….
…..and conclude that this is nothing short of epic failure.
……..How Progressive!!!!!

Baxter Greene on July 30, 2010 at 11:14 AM

Right on, Ed.

mikeyboss on July 30, 2010 at 11:23 AM

GDP Report: Liar Liar Pants On Fire

“By far, the largest real growth going on is the size of the lies about the state of the economy.” /slovester

Rae on July 30, 2010 at 11:38 AM

Baxter Greene on July 30, 2010 at 11:14 AM

Nicely stated…

Keemo on July 30, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Let’s see. The TRUE unemployment rate is around 17%, yet these bozo “economists” keep saying the ‘economy is slowly improving’. What freaking planet are they living on? We don’t even have a growth rate to take into account the 100,000 who enter the work force for the first time each month.

GarandFan on July 30, 2010 at 11:53 AM

lorien1973 on July 30, 2010 at 10:53 AM

Exactly right. Thousands of census workers and other positions that temporary at best. This administration is playing monopoly with real money. We will survive this and learn much from it; this despite dummies such as seven seas.

Of the people, by the people, for the people will only survive if we the people actually take our part in the big picture seriously. Right now the people are involved and engaged. This dynamic needs to remain consistent no matter if things are looking good, or looking scary.

Keemo on July 30, 2010 at 11:56 AM

All government data is erroneous bull shiite.
It’s not that they just manipulate the data but the data set they work from is BS in the first place.

esnap on July 30, 2010 at 12:09 PM

Aside from this being bad for the currant group of Tyrants there is no way to see this as good for any of us.

History is being written. Generations will study what this administration did wrong so they don’t repeat the mistakes of our day.

This sucks.

Obama sucks.

petunia on July 30, 2010 at 12:25 PM

Without the government spending, Q2 would have looked pretty bad, it appears — and that spending bubble is nearing its end.

And government spending shouldn’t be in the number at all. What is the actual GDP without the spending? Would it be negative or zero?

dogsoldier on July 30, 2010 at 12:32 PM

Umm, Obama was out spinning his fabricated “jobs saved or created” yesterday on The View. It is the people’s ignorance, dependence, and quietly desperate faith in this charlatan that emboldens the Administration to make such bald-faced lies.
GTR640 on July 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM

Exactly right. People need to get their heads out of the sand and pay attention to what’s really going on. If they did, Obama wouldn’t be able to get away with the vast majority of what he says.

Callie C. on July 30, 2010 at 12:34 PM

when they let the tax cuts expire and we hit the air pocket then plummet in ‘11 the Keynesians will have no leg left to stand on for hopefully at LEAST another 3 generations

Hold On everybody, it’s a bumpy ride but we can stick it out!

ginaswo on July 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM

..”double-edged sword of Damocles..

Hey, I though we were supposed to bury all of that Birther talk? Oh, you said Keynesians!
..never mind!

The War Planner on July 30, 2010 at 12:43 PM

Jeff2161 on July 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM

holy shxt! that would be a HELLUVA rocket to power a consumer led recovery and doing it with housing the root of the bubble is just so …poetic.

and Main St would be frakkin ecstatic as it would reward those who pay on time.

the GSEs would be losing some future cash flow but if they did this, it would tamper down the pixxed off Main St when they cut the defaulting mortgages-if they are smart enough to do both at once that is-thus taking the hit now and getting ALL the consumers back on the road to solvency on their biggest asset, their homes

WOW is all I can say, it would be a HUGE win IMO, which of course may mean it doesnt happen, but it is political gold, I mean where is the downside? the big banks sold all these loans off to the GSEs already so they wont take the hit, the GSEs face it, Frank and Obama and Donovan will make them into utilities if the GOP doesnt take back the Congress, so we will not be getting the 167B back….

I am all for it, it would IMO save the Dems. Maybe O will be waiting to roll this out in 2011 as part of his triangulation ahead of his 12 campaign.

but I do not think O has it in him to embrace free market economics that would have to follow this move to get job creation going gangbusters, but since consumer is so much of GDP, it would get growth up, all those homeowners spending like crazy…

ginaswo on July 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM

The slowdown came across a broad swath of the economy, with most indicators reduced but still positive in Q2:

Brace yourself as the numbers get revised downwards over the next month or so. I had voted “2%” in yesterday’s poll, so I think I’m still on track with my estimate

AH_C on July 30, 2010 at 1:53 PM

Green Acres … er, green shoots! Aw, hell: Green Acres!

ya2daup on July 30, 2010 at 2:09 PM

Green Acres … er, green shoots! Aw, hell: Green Acres!

ya2daup on July 30, 2010 at 2:09 PM

ya2daup: Loved that show,then,PettiCoat Junction!!:)

canopfor on July 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM

This is a political disaster for Democrats. There’s no way to spin a 2.4% GDP rate as a positive step in a recovery

lol, Obama is already doing it. He made a speech in front of the UAW and boasted about how the economy grew 2.4%, which is better than shrinking. He then took credit for this job well done and bashed “the party of no”.

Either he is a great liar or he actually thinks he is doing a good job.

Daemonocracy on July 30, 2010 at 2:37 PM

Seven Seas on July 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM

Yes 2.4% is a positive rate however it takes a rate above 3% to create enough jobs to get above population growth. At this point the economy will only sputter along on 1 or 2 cylinders.

chemman on July 30, 2010 at 4:02 PM

Where do I pick up my prize for yesterday’s prediction???

But we all know that this 2.4% is an UPPER LIMIT, which will be revised downward “unexpectedly” over a weekend when the Obamaninnies think nobody is paying attention!!!

landlines on July 30, 2010 at 4:24 PM

Comment pages: 1 2