Open thread: Rangel hearing ready to roll; Update: Rangel cuts a deal?; Update: Rangel denies deal made

posted at 11:36 am on July 29, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

In just a little under 90 minutes, Rep. Charles Rangel will have to defend himself in the first House ethics trial in eight years.  Democrats have attempted to get Rangel to agree to a deal that will save them from a nationally-covered hearing on Democratic corruption, but at least as of now, Rangel hasn’t agreed to fall on his sword.  The Hill reports that Rangel thinks he can beat the rap:

Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) is ready to lay out his case to the public and thinks he can win, barring a last-minute deal in his showdown with the House ethics committee.

“[Thursday] is D-Day and he’s digging in for a fight,” a member of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) said. “He has 40 years invested in this place, and he’s not about to go out this way if he can help it.”

Rangel said as much himself this week as his lawyers negotiated with ethics committee aides over a settlement that could allow him and his party to avoid a high-profile public trail. Rangel has called the ethics committee action against him a “public lynching” and insisted he would rather tell his side of the story than admit guilt.

After delivering a defiant but upbeat lunchtime speech to the Urban League on Wednesday, Rangel told a throng of reporters trailing his every move that it would be a relief to finally tell his side of the story.

A relief to Rangel, perhaps.  It’s no relief to Democrats, who see this as an advertisement for Republicans in the midterm elections.

It’s not going to get any easier, either.  Rangel’s use of the phrase “public lynching” is no accident.  He needs the CBC at his back in order to ensure that he doesn’t get expelled from Congress, and so far the CBC has signaled that they will stand by Rangel.  Couching his dire situation in references to race is part of Rangel’s strategy to keep Democratic leadership from supporting expulsion.  It’s worked in the past; the CBC kept William “Dollar Bill” Jefferson in the House and even got him a committee assignment while being indicted on corruption charges, a move that eventually cost Democrats the seat from New Orleans.

At least for now, Rangel doesn’t face any such indictment on criminal charges, but just the ethics charges in the House.  If Nancy Pelosi couldn’t fight the CBC on Jefferson, she’s not going to let Rangel get expelled.  And that means that the House will have to come up with something short of expulsion despite the rather obvious violations in which Rangel engaged — and that plays right into the GOP’s hands.

Can Pelosi convince Rangel to retire before the hearing starts?  We’ll soon see — and if not, we’ll soon see the hearing.

Update: Or maybe not, as WCBS TV reports now:

New York Congressman Charles Rangel has reportedly cut a deal to admit to ethical wrongdoing and avoid a potentially humiliating public trial.

Harlem friends of Rangel tell CBS 2 they have been told that the details could be unveiled when the House Ethics Committee meets Thursday afternoon.

So I guess we can cancel Rangelmas for today, but if Rangel stays in the House, the GOP will be celebrating it every day between now and November.

Update II: Rangelmas back on?

New York Democrat Charles Rangel says there’s no deal yet to settle his ethics case and avoid a trial on charges of violating standards of conduct.

Rangel told reporters outside his office, “Until someone tells me there’s a deal, there isn’t.”

Looks like the trial’s still on.  (via the Boss Emeritus)

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Don’t Resign Charlie…

We know that the state is a gang of thieves, and almost all members of the House and Senate belong to it. But with Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) we have an open crook rather than a crypto one. So stay, Charlie, to help remind us of the true nature of the government

PatriotRider on July 29, 2010 at 11:41 AM

Quick! Send the riot police to Harlem. It’s been a long summer and folks are unemployed and bored there.

jeanie on July 29, 2010 at 11:42 AM

Committee of Standards of Official Conduct – 111th Congress

Democrats

* Zoe Lofgren, California, Chairwoman
* Ben Chandler, Kentucky
* G.K. Butterfield, North Carolina
* Kathy Castor, Florida
* Peter Welch, Vermont

Republicans

* Jo Bonner, Alabama, Ranking Member
* Michael McCaul, Texas
* Mike Conaway, Texas
* Charlie Dent, Pennsylvania
* Gregg Harper, Mississippi

Inanemergencydial on July 29, 2010 at 11:43 AM

I’m not surprised that the CBC intends to stand by Charlie.
For them race is everything-ethical behavior be d*mmned!

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 11:43 AM

It won’t be a whitewash per se, but this will be as effective as the CRU climate investigation.

Call me a cynic, but Rangel will riggle through like the snake he is.

Get him to retire? He should be in prison.

Anything less shows the system to be as corrupt as Rangel himself.

catmman on July 29, 2010 at 11:43 AM

You got to wonder, is the problem blacks always stand in support of black criminals? And why?

Seems odd this seems to happen more often than not.

tarpon on July 29, 2010 at 11:44 AM

Rangel Theme!
=================
THE CARS ― Bye Bye Love

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR6GDGoiO8Y

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 11:44 AM

The Democrats need a fall guy to make it look as though Pelosi is keeping her promise to run the “most ethical” congress evah.

Fine with me, I am more than happy to see Rangel go down.

UltimateBob on July 29, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Go Charlie, Go! Narcissism is a great thing in this instance!

bluemarlin on July 29, 2010 at 11:47 AM

tarpon on July 29, 2010 at 11:44 AM

We have much the same problem downunder.

OldEnglish on July 29, 2010 at 11:47 AM

Rangel Theme!
=================
THE CARS ― Bye Bye Love

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 11:44 AM

Good one. Except in Rangel’s case, the song should be called, “Bye Bye, you shyster used-car-salesman-looking crook posing as a career politician.”

UltimateBob on July 29, 2010 at 11:49 AM

Everyone is just picking on Charlie because he’s BLACK.

Now the question is, WHO will drop the race card?

GarandFan on July 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM

The Adjudicatory Subcommittee of the House Standards of Official Conduct Committee held an organizational meeting to prepare for its work to determine whether any counts in the Statement of Alleged Violation in the matter of Representative Charles Rangel have been proved by clear and convincing ..
====================

C-Span at 1:00PM——LIVE FEED!!!!!

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/id/229311

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM

If I never hear that phlemy voice again, it’s fine with me.

Retire, Charlie.

txsurveyor on July 29, 2010 at 11:51 AM

OT: What Is the Endgame for Conservatives?

This is as good as the Ruling Class article a few days ago. Don’t miss it.

[After November] what will change?

Will ObamaCare be repealed? Almost assuredly not.

Will illegal aliens be deported and the Mexican border sealed? No. Sen. McCain … will join forces with Obama and Sen. Graham to grant amnesty to the 12 to 15 million illegal aliens already here, during a time of 10% unemployment.

faraway on July 29, 2010 at 11:52 AM

“so far the CBC has signaled that they will stand by Rangel”

Can’t they stand by the people they represent instead of the one they happen to look like?

WitchDoctor on July 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM

First Wittiness:

Frank Pentangeli

portlandon on July 29, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Rangel needs to be the GOP poster boy, alongside Nancy’s broken promise to “drain the swamp.”

blacks always stand in support of black criminals

Not trying to get up on a high horse or be picky, but IMHO these sweeping generalizations are not appropriate. The GOP has fantastic black candidates this election cycle, and there are numerous strong black tea-party organizers/supporters (despite the media wishing it were otherwise).

Firefly_76 on July 29, 2010 at 11:55 AM

Can’t they stand by the people they represent instead of the one they happen to look like?

WitchDoctor on July 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM

No.

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 11:55 AM

Couching his dire situation in references to race is part of Rangel’s strategy to keep Democratic leadership from supporting expulsion.

In this moment, and with the first ‘post-racial president’, this couldn’t be more precarious and badly timed for the left. Put the schadenfreude hat on and sip a good drink. It couldn’t happen to a more ‘ethical congress, evah’.

We are ruled and fooled by hypocritical incontinents and teenagers.

Schadenfreude on July 29, 2010 at 11:55 AM

she’s not going to let Rangel get expelled. And that means that the House will have to come up with something short of expulsion despite the rather obvious violations in which Rangel engaged — and that plays right into the GOP’s hands.

drain the swamp? she’s only making it bigger…

if not doesn’t get kicked out…there will be hell to pay by the (D)s

delicious! making some popcorn now

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 11:55 AM

Culture of (D) Corruption.

THESE ARE THE RATS WHO JUST TOOK OVER YOUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.

Good Lt on July 29, 2010 at 11:56 AM

Somehow I don’t see this hearing actually taking place. I hope I’m wrong, but the Democrats have to much at stake to let this get aired in public. I see a plea deal with minor repercussions for Charlie.

sandee on July 29, 2010 at 11:56 AM

I’m not surprised that the CBC intends to stand by Charlie.
For them race is everything-ethical behavior be d*mmned!

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 11:43 AM

spot on!

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Remember Dan Rostenkowski
===========================

Dan Rostenkowski is an American politician who was the powerful Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee (1981-1994), while serving as an 18-term U.S. Congressman for the 8th District of Illinois (1959-1995).

U.S. Rep. Rostenkowski was later charged with 17 counts of corruption for misuse of public taxpayer funds and was sentenced to 17 months in Federal prison.

http://www.accuracyproject.org/cbe-Rostenkowski,Dan.html

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Anything less shows the system to be as corrupt as Rangel himself.

And a wrist-slap will prove that Democrats are incapable of providing oversight on themselves, and hence, why we need a check on their power.

Good Lt on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

O/T: Sherrod is suing Breitbart.

Joe Caps on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

For some reason this song makes me think of Rangel.

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM

GarandFan on July 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM

clyburn or waters is my guess

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM

Firefly_76 on July 29, 2010 at 11:55 AM

but will they be welcomed with open arms by the CBC when they win office?

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM

I’m not surprised that the CBC intends to stand by Charlie.
For them race is everything-ethical behavior be d*mmned!

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 11:43 AM

“[...]they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” Oh, nevermind.

WashJeff on July 29, 2010 at 12:00 PM

Joe Caps, link?

sandee on July 29, 2010 at 12:00 PM

O/T: Sherrod is suing Breitbart.

Joe Caps on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

not surprised…hope she loses big time!

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:00 PM

Fight them Charlie! Never give up! Racist democrats. HA! HA! HA!

RMR on July 29, 2010 at 12:01 PM

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM

:)
excellent

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:01 PM

Meanwhile…….

What about Rangel…

Ah..um….after ah…Sherrod…and that unemploymentphoto
opGate…ah…I…think…ah…throw ah..um…Charlie…
ah…um…under da bus….and.ah..i..i..ah..um…going ah
golfing…ah…um….

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:01 PM

faraway on July 29, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Thanks for that piece; its eye opening. I think we will not see any real change until we take our local and state boards, schools and legislatures back, and elect true Goldwater-style constitutional conservatives to state and national office. Otherwise, perhaps a ConCon to repeal the 16th and 17th amendments and pass a balanced budget amendment.

Failing these steps, I think its 1994 all over again, frankly.

Firefly_76 on July 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM

O/T: Sherrod is suing Breitbart.

Joe Caps on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM
===================================
not surprised…hope she loses big time!

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:00 PM

cmsinaz: I second that!!:)

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM

Bring on the show.

VibrioCocci on July 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM

BREAKING on Fox: Rangel has struck a deal–unconfirmed.

Enoxo on July 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM

I told you so…..

sandee on July 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM

Dan Rostenkowski is an American politician who was the powerful Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee (1981-1994), while serving as an 18-term U.S. Congressman for the 8th District of Illinois (1959-1995).

U.S. Rep. Rostenkowski was later charged with 17 counts of corruption for misuse of public taxpayer funds and was sentenced to 17 months in Federal prison.

http://www.accuracyproject.org/cbe-Rostenkowski,Dan.html

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Because of that scandal Rosty lost his seat to Republican Michael Flanagan who two years later lost his seat to…wait for it…Rod Blagojevich.

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM

BREAKING on Fox: Rangel has struck a deal–unconfirmed.

Enoxo on July 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM

dang it, I just made some popcorn

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM

For some reason this song makes me think of Rangel.

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM

annoyinglittletwerp: You have a linky glitch-aroo!:)

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM

O/T: Sherrod is suing Breitbart.

Joe Caps on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Thx

MeatHeadinCA on July 29, 2010 at 12:05 PM

but will they be welcomed with open arms by the CBC when they win office?

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM

No. But that would further underscore the fact that ideology trumps race, even for the CBC. They will be welcomed by the *diverse* Tea Party Caucus …

Firefly_76 on July 29, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Sherrod is suing Breitbart.

Good.

Discovery should be fun.

Court: Mr. Breitbart. Did you post the video?

AB: Um, yes. I wasn’t aware there are laws against posting videos of people saying things at public events.

Court: Did you know it was incomplete at the time you aired it?

AB: As you could have known from the get go if you simply READ WHAT I WROTE WHEN I POSTED IT, yes, and I was denied access to the full tape by the NAACP when I asked for it prior to posting.

Court: Did you know what was on the rest of the tape before you aired it?

AB: Um, as I said, NO. Hence, why I asked to see it before posting. And there goes your suit.

Court: Are you now or have you ever been a Republican or a conservative?

AB: Yes.

Court: GUILTY. 10 YEARS.

Pretty much what they’re trying to do here.

Good Lt on July 29, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Enoxo on July 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM
dang it, I just made some popcorn

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM

cmsinaz: D*mmit,I just made another pot of tea!!:)

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

Firefly_76 on July 29, 2010 at 12:05 PM

indeed they will :)

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

O/T: Sherrod is suing Breitbart.

Joe Caps on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Great! He should relish this.

Schadenfreude on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

Can we say a prayer for the soldiers of the c130 that crashed at Elmendorf yesterday? I can’t find out if one of my friends was on it or not. I can’t get a hold of him.

upinak on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

Rangel is right. He probably will beat the rap. DC is full scared white people afraid of Black Democrats. That’s why you hardly see any prominent black apologize or plead guilty. They have moral authority don’t you know.

Hummer53 on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

All the smoke and mirrors along the beltway have been called in to testify.

Limerick on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

BREAKING on Fox: Rangel has struck a deal–unconfirmed.

And the Culture of Corruption (D) continues unabated.

Way to “drain the swamp,” Nancy!

Good Lt on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

cmsinaz: D*mmit,I just made another pot of tea!!:)

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

LOL :)

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

Rush:

Rangel/

This is worse than when I was attacked in Korea!!

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM

Gee, what a surprise. He cut a deal.

Beautiful day here in central NH, think I’ll take a drive and pay a visit to Claude Rains’ grave.

Del Dolemonte on July 29, 2010 at 12:09 PM

Who exactly did he have to cut a deal with?

forest on July 29, 2010 at 12:10 PM

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 11:44 AM
===================
Good one. Except in Rangel’s case, the song should be called, “Bye Bye, you shyster used-car-salesman-looking crook posing as a career politician.”

UltimateBob on July 29, 2010 at 11:49 AM

UltimateBob: Haha,true dat!!!:)

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:10 PM

How is this even getting airtime,is Holder
okay this!!???

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:11 PM

How will she prove damages? She was offered her job back within days. It made her famous.

The victim culture (of all stripes – hot coffee is hot!) is so out of control in this country I think it will be our undoing when all is said and done.

WitchDoctor on July 29, 2010 at 12:11 PM

annoyinglittletwerp: You have a linky glitch-aroo!:)

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM

It works fine for me. It must not like you because you’re a Breitbart loving racist cracker or something.
*wink* *grin*

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM

The most ethical Congress ever!

I’m going to clean the house!

–Nancy “Palomino” Pelosi

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM

Unexpectedly, this is not an item that’s getting much attention in the media. WaPo at least has a story on it, but they’re not displaying it prominently.

hawksruleva on July 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM

I think Breitbart should counter sue. She was all over the airwaves slandering him. I think he has a better case than her.

sandee on July 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM

Can we say a prayer for the soldiers of the c130 that crashed at Elmendorf yesterday? I can’t find out if one of my friends was on it or not. I can’t get a hold of him.

upinak on July 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM

Done; sorry about the terrible news. Hope your friend is alright!

Firefly_76 on July 29, 2010 at 12:13 PM

BREAKING on Fox: Rangel has struck a deal–unconfirmed.

Enoxo on July 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM

Thanks… now an update on Fox’s website.

MeatHeadinCA on July 29, 2010 at 12:13 PM

Discovery should be fun.

Good Lt on July 29, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Dems aren’t interested in discovering anything in any case. They already have their minds made up. I’ve often wondered if it’s easier to go through life thinking you know the answers. But my guess is that people who think they know it all constantly bump into reminders that they’re idiots.

hawksruleva on July 29, 2010 at 12:15 PM

Charlie and the Dems blinked.

Fox just said that today would have been only a preliminary hearing of sorts. There would be a trial in September. Just what the Dems want.

C’mon, GOP. Play hard ball. The worst that can happen is that Charlie refuses to your terms and goes to trial in September. This is no witch hunt.

BuckeyeSam on July 29, 2010 at 12:19 PM

He’s already cut a deal.

JammieWearingFool on July 29, 2010 at 12:19 PM

He’s already cut a deal.

JammieWearingFool on July 29, 2010 at 12:19 PM

Sounds like a great commercial for the GOP!

MeatHeadinCA on July 29, 2010 at 12:20 PM

Rangelmas

heh :)

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:21 PM

For some reason this song makes me think of Rangel.

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM

annoyinglittletwerp: Your right its blocked in Canada!:)
======================================================

This video contains content from WMG, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM

Lets not forget that the “nation was not harmed in any way” by Rangels un-ethical and criminal activity.

BobMbx on July 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM

SOB
=======

The weasel,weaseled a deal!!

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:24 PM

Rangel Cuts a Deal…..too funny

One crook cuts a deal with other crooks…

PatriotRider on July 29, 2010 at 12:24 PM

Jail breaking rocks he needs to be. – Yoda

CynicalOptimist on July 29, 2010 at 12:24 PM

Now, explain to me how he can cut a deal when he’s done something illegal (not pay taxes)?

I tell you, the political ads just write themselves, don’t they? All the GOP needs to do is re-air actual footage of all the DEM disasters… one right after another.

Oink on July 29, 2010 at 12:25 PM

Rangel cuts a deal?

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo…………

Rocks on July 29, 2010 at 12:26 PM

Charlie Rangel:

I am a Congressman. I can do as I wish without consequence. I can spend the people’s money freely as I choose. The constitution means nothing if it poses a block to anything I want to do. I am entitled to my elected position. The law does not apply to me and, in the event it actually might, I should be permitted to negotiate with my collegues as to whether or not I should be held accountable…. by the way, accountable means that I might have to retire, not GO TO JAIL.

The absolute epitome of the people that caused the Tea Party to exist.

CC

CapedConservative on July 29, 2010 at 12:26 PM

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Because of that scandal Rosty lost his seat to Republican Michael Flanagan who two years later lost his seat to…wait for it…Rod Blagojevich.

annoyinglittletwerp on July 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM

annoyinglittletwerp: Wow,thats weird,what a freaggin soap
opera!!:)

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:26 PM

O/T: Sherrod is suing Breitbart.

Joe Caps on July 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM

not surprised…hope she loses big time!

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:00 PM

Public figure, fair use…by the facts and the law, she should lose. But she won’t.

James on July 29, 2010 at 12:29 PM

And…

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/charlie.rangel.ethics.2.1831649.html

MeatHeadinCA on July 29, 2010 at 12:15 PM

MeatHeadinCA: A whole thread ruined,and deprived of
SNARK!!:)

canopfor on July 29, 2010 at 12:29 PM

This is really a tough one for democrats because in their eyes he really didn’t do anything wrong. It’s so tiring to obey the law and periodically pretend you have character and morals.

darwin on July 29, 2010 at 12:29 PM

James on July 29, 2010 at 12:29 PM

you maybe right, but I sure can hope there is some justice in the system despite what was ruled yesterday in AZ…

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM

I wonder, can I cut a deal with the speedlimit signs on Hwy 360?

Limerick on July 29, 2010 at 12:33 PM

So I guess we can cancel Rangelmas for today, but if Rangel stays in the House, the GOP will be celebrating it every day between now and November of 2012.

FIFY Ed. You don’t think Charlie will actually LOSE an election in HIS district, do you?

CC

CapedConservative on July 29, 2010 at 12:33 PM

GFTO Rangel.

Next.

rollthedice on July 29, 2010 at 12:38 PM

Who exactly did he have to cut a deal with?

forest on July 29, 2010 at 12:10 PM

Didn’t at least one R have to agree to any deal? Names?

txmomof6 on July 29, 2010 at 12:39 PM

Moran of VA should be next on the hit parade.

faol on July 29, 2010 at 12:41 PM

Didn’t at least one R have to agree to any deal? Names?

txmomof6 on July 29, 2010 at 12:39 PM

you are right…who is the weasel?

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:43 PM

I personally think the damage was done months ago. Postponing this was up to Pelosi, and it was truly appalling.

It’s already over, frankly. The fact is that his district will want him anyway.

And that says it all.

AnninCA on July 29, 2010 at 12:44 PM

New York Congressman Charles Rangel has reportedly cut a deal to admit to ethical wrongdoing and avoid a potentially humiliating public trial.–WCBS TV reports

On Deck…

Chris Dodd,
bunting for the “CountryWide” Rippers.

“Let’s Roll”

On Watch on July 29, 2010 at 12:52 PM

you are right…who is the weasel?

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 12:43 PM

Well, Yes – one Republican has to agree to any deal buuuuttt …

Why would the GOP stand in the way of a deal?

The best possible scenario would be for the committee to give him a very slight slap on the wrist – and if I were the GOP guy or gal on that committee I’d say “Uhm, yeah sure – go ahead”.

And then I’d point out that the incident was whitewashed by the Democrats and that I was outnumbered on the committee. I’d say that Rangle is a criminal, but there’s nothing that can be done about it until you put more Republicans on that committee in November.

Seeeeeeeeeeeee?

HondaV65 on July 29, 2010 at 12:59 PM

Why don’t we all just quit paying taxes! What are the feds gonna do to 50-100 million non payers?

Alinsky the Alinskyites!

dhunter on July 29, 2010 at 1:01 PM

BREAKING on Fox: Rangel asked if there is a deal, and he says, “I have no idea.”

Brilliant minds in Congress.

Enoxo on July 29, 2010 at 1:09 PM

I think the committee was evenly split.

sandee on July 29, 2010 at 1:09 PM

You got to wonder, is the problem blacks always stand in support of black criminals? And why?

Seems odd this seems to happen more often than not.

tarpon on July 29, 2010

Perpetual victims of white oppression have to stick together.

Extrafishy on July 29, 2010 at 1:15 PM

HondaV65 on July 29, 2010 at 12:59 PM

gotcha

cmsinaz on July 29, 2010 at 1:16 PM

Comment pages: 1 2