<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obamateurism of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Allamon Cartoon Blog: Vetting — Emerging Corruption</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3767496</link>
		<dc:creator>The Allamon Cartoon Blog: Vetting — Emerging Corruption</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3767496</guid>
		<description>[...] here for story about presser prop gone wrong, Leslie [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here for story about presser prop gone wrong, Leslie [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3754719</link>
		<dc:creator>slp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3754719</guid>
		<description>As Judge Susan Bolton noted in her decision on the Arizona SB1070, running a records check on Leslie Macko and other poster girls and boys would be too much of a burden on FBI criminal records internet database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Judge Susan Bolton noted in her decision on the Arizona SB1070, running a records check on Leslie Macko and other poster girls and boys would be too much of a burden on FBI criminal records internet database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama: We MUST extend unemployment benefits so that drug addicts and criminals can keep gettng paid! &#124; The Daley Gator</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3754643</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama: We MUST extend unemployment benefits so that drug addicts and criminals can keep gettng paid! &#124; The Daley Gator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3754643</guid>
		<description>[...] way of Ed Morrissey at Hot Air: Many of the OOTD entries have to do with poor research informing statements from Barack Obama, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way of Ed Morrissey at Hot Air: Many of the OOTD entries have to do with poor research informing statements from Barack Obama, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: landlines</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3754342</link>
		<dc:creator>landlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3754342</guid>
		<description>The politicians, especially Obama and the big-government types, like to talk about &quot;unemployment insurance&quot; as though it was a &lt;em&gt;gift from government&lt;/em&gt;.

&lt;strong&gt;The reality is that &quot;unemployment insurance&quot; is a &lt;em&gt;tax on employers&lt;/em&gt;...and an especially onerous and expensive tax in an environment such as this one!!!&lt;/strong&gt;

Any expansion of unemployment benefits will necessarily &lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;remove&lt;/em&gt; money from potential employers and thus &lt;em&gt;diminish the possibility of more employment&lt;/em&gt;!!!

And the worst effect is that &quot;unemployment insurance&quot; falls most heavily on new businesses and businesses who have never laid anyone off: the very businesses that would otherwise provide the most new jobs!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The politicians, especially Obama and the big-government types, like to talk about &#8220;unemployment insurance&#8221; as though it was a <em>gift from government</em>.</p>
<p><strong>The reality is that &#8220;unemployment insurance&#8221; is a <em>tax on employers</em>&#8230;and an especially onerous and expensive tax in an environment such as this one!!!</strong></p>
<p>Any expansion of unemployment benefits will necessarily <em></em><em>remove</em> money from potential employers and thus <em>diminish the possibility of more employment</em>!!!</p>
<p>And the worst effect is that &#8220;unemployment insurance&#8221; falls most heavily on new businesses and businesses who have never laid anyone off: the very businesses that would otherwise provide the most new jobs!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3754079</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3754079</guid>
		<description>Not many people get fired anymore. Most are asked to resign. It&#039;s a symptom of our overly litigious society. What if she was fired and charges were later dropped? She could go back and sue. She could win on third appeal, etc. Companies don&#039;t want to be burdened by the possibility of legal action so they take the easy way out.

At one time as I recall you could not get unemployment insurance if you were fired or quit voluntarily. Has that gone by the wayside as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not many people get fired anymore. Most are asked to resign. It&#8217;s a symptom of our overly litigious society. What if she was fired and charges were later dropped? She could go back and sue. She could win on third appeal, etc. Companies don&#8217;t want to be burdened by the possibility of legal action so they take the easy way out.</p>
<p>At one time as I recall you could not get unemployment insurance if you were fired or quit voluntarily. Has that gone by the wayside as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djaymick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753880</link>
		<dc:creator>djaymick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753880</guid>
		<description>I guess ACAC has no problem signing off on her unemployment claim.  If an individual is dismissed with cause, companies usually fight the unemployment claim.  This keeps their unemployment rates (at least in Delaware) down, especially since it&#039;s paid by the employer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess ACAC has no problem signing off on her unemployment claim.  If an individual is dismissed with cause, companies usually fight the unemployment claim.  This keeps their unemployment rates (at least in Delaware) down, especially since it&#8217;s paid by the employer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slowburn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753846</link>
		<dc:creator>Slowburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753846</guid>
		<description>Oh hum. Tell me when he does something well, that is pro America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh hum. Tell me when he does something well, that is pro America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who is John Galt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753835</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is John Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753835</guid>
		<description>If Rangel doesn&#039;t go to freaking PRISON can we finally admit TYRANNY coming from D.C.?

And what do we do about that? Hmm?


PS preview is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Rangel doesn&#8217;t go to freaking PRISON can we finally admit TYRANNY coming from D.C.?</p>
<p>And what do we do about that? Hmm?</p>
<p>PS preview is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rayra</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753817</link>
		<dc:creator>rayra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753817</guid>
		<description>Obviously Obama&#039;s handlers are able to completely bypass the Secret Service&#039;s background / vetting procedures. If you or I tried to merely get on the White House tour with a cirminal record, we wouldn&#039;t be allowed in. But if you are a tool for the Obamunists, you get right in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously Obama&#8217;s handlers are able to completely bypass the Secret Service&#8217;s background / vetting procedures. If you or I tried to merely get on the White House tour with a cirminal record, we wouldn&#8217;t be allowed in. But if you are a tool for the Obamunists, you get right in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meMC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753448</link>
		<dc:creator>meMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753448</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The OOTD is more about the White House putting an &lt;strike&gt;fraudster&lt;/strike&gt; illegal on stage as an example of the misfortunate &lt;strike&gt;unemployed&lt;/strike&gt;, when Macko created her own problems by breaking the law.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

FIFY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The OOTD is more about the White House putting an <strike>fraudster</strike> illegal on stage as an example of the misfortunate <strike>unemployed</strike>, when Macko created her own problems by breaking the law.</p></blockquote>
<p>FIFY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ya2daup</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753373</link>
		<dc:creator>ya2daup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753373</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is our money going to support a convicted fraudster?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Getting ahead of ourselves: gotta indict and try Obi-Won first. 

/chompin&#039; at the bit for impeachment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is our money going to support a convicted fraudster?</p></blockquote>
<p>Getting ahead of ourselves: gotta indict and try Obi-Won first. </p>
<p>/chompin&#8217; at the bit for impeachment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canopfor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753276</link>
		<dc:creator>canopfor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753276</guid>
		<description>Piff,I never use the Preview button!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piff,I never use the Preview button!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin.hale</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753189</link>
		<dc:creator>martin.hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753189</guid>
		<description>Another swing and a miss for the Champ.  

I wonder why we never hear of any heads rolling for all of these unforced errors - and make no mistake about it, these are unforced errors.  Doesn&#039;t this administration have any concern at all for the quality of what they do?

Rhetorical question there folks - no answer needed.

PS - I&#039;d warrant the failure of the Preview button has something to do with a doubleclick script bombing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another swing and a miss for the Champ.  </p>
<p>I wonder why we never hear of any heads rolling for all of these unforced errors &#8211; and make no mistake about it, these are unforced errors.  Doesn&#8217;t this administration have any concern at all for the quality of what they do?</p>
<p>Rhetorical question there folks &#8211; no answer needed.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; I&#8217;d warrant the failure of the Preview button has something to do with a doubleclick script bombing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryG</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753137</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753137</guid>
		<description>Well, what can be said of a bunch of dildoes at the WH who have Glenn Beck&#039;s phone number and won&#039;t call him for advice on how to set up a research staff? The success ratio is remarkable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what can be said of a bunch of dildoes at the WH who have Glenn Beck&#8217;s phone number and won&#8217;t call him for advice on how to set up a research staff? The success ratio is remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: year_of_the_dingo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753122</link>
		<dc:creator>year_of_the_dingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753122</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Because she’s eligible for only a few more weeks of unemployment, she’s doing what she never thought she’d have to do. Not at this point, anyway. She’s turning to her father for financial support.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If her father can help her out, then why should we tax-payers intervene? Not everyone&#039;s parents are deadbeats, Barry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because she’s eligible for only a few more weeks of unemployment, she’s doing what she never thought she’d have to do. Not at this point, anyway. She’s turning to her father for financial support.</p></blockquote>
<p>If her father can help her out, then why should we tax-payers intervene? Not everyone&#8217;s parents are deadbeats, Barry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753096</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753096</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hahahahahha!!!!!!!!!

A FRAUD presenting a FRAUD!  Priceless!

Yep, PREVIEW button no workee.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hahahahahha!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>A FRAUD presenting a FRAUD!  Priceless!</p>
<p>Yep, PREVIEW button no workee.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753075</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753075</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;BTW, anyone else’s Preview button not working? 
pain train on July 29, 2010 at 11:36 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not working for me either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>BTW, anyone else’s Preview button not working?<br />
pain train on July 29, 2010 at 11:36 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Not working for me either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schadenfreude</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753054</link>
		<dc:creator>Schadenfreude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753054</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And why can’t the White House do research, for crying out loud?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Incompetence is indignant. The land is run by a Nero: extravagance and &#039;tyranny&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And why can’t the White House do research, for crying out loud?</p></blockquote>
<p>Incompetence is indignant. The land is run by a Nero: extravagance and &#8216;tyranny&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pain train</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3753003</link>
		<dc:creator>pain train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3753003</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Would it not be more realistic to blame some of the unemployment of estheticians on a lack-of-bush?

Yoop on July 29, 2010 at 9:55 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Look at the poll numbers, bush is making a comeback.

BTW, anyone else&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;Preview&lt;/strong&gt; button not working? I&#039;ve tried it in both Firefox &amp; IE - nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Would it not be more realistic to blame some of the unemployment of estheticians on a lack-of-bush?</p>
<p>Yoop on July 29, 2010 at 9:55 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Look at the poll numbers, bush is making a comeback.</p>
<p>BTW, anyone else&#8217;s <strong>Preview</strong> button not working? I&#8217;ve tried it in both Firefox &amp; IE &#8211; nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Napsalot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3752964</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Napsalot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3752964</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be silly, of course the WH knows who Leslie Macko is, and how she&#039;s unemployed.

It is not likely, anybody from the streets gets a chance for an photo op with the POTUS.  

Last time it happened, we had Joe the Plumber.  And that is the absolute last time Obama&#039;s going to try something spontaneous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be silly, of course the WH knows who Leslie Macko is, and how she&#8217;s unemployed.</p>
<p>It is not likely, anybody from the streets gets a chance for an photo op with the POTUS.  </p>
<p>Last time it happened, we had Joe the Plumber.  And that is the absolute last time Obama&#8217;s going to try something spontaneous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotdax</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3752920</link>
		<dc:creator>hotdax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3752920</guid>
		<description>I thought everyone who gets close to the president has to go through a background check.  Oh wait, they got rid of the background check office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought everyone who gets close to the president has to go through a background check.  Oh wait, they got rid of the background check office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alden Pyle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3752899</link>
		<dc:creator>Alden Pyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3752899</guid>
		<description>Give a brother a break, he was just striking up a conversation as he was scoring an 8 ball off her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give a brother a break, he was just striking up a conversation as he was scoring an 8 ball off her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrt721</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3752867</link>
		<dc:creator>mrt721</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3752867</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a better question:
How is Macko collecting unemployment at all?
I didn&#039;t think you were eligible if you either quit your job, &lt;strong&gt;or were &quot;fired for cause&quot;.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a better question:<br />
How is Macko collecting unemployment at all?<br />
I didn&#8217;t think you were eligible if you either quit your job, <strong>or were &#8220;fired for cause&#8221;.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3752856</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3752856</guid>
		<description>Above and beyond the absolute pathetic inability of the Obama Administration to perform due diligence, there&#039;s this: &lt;em&gt;She&#039;s turning to her father for financial support.&lt;/em&gt;

Why is this bad, but turning to taxpayers to support you just fine and dandy?  This social justice stuff makes no sense. Unless you&#039;re a thief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Above and beyond the absolute pathetic inability of the Obama Administration to perform due diligence, there&#8217;s this: <em>She&#8217;s turning to her father for financial support.</em></p>
<p>Why is this bad, but turning to taxpayers to support you just fine and dandy?  This social justice stuff makes no sense. Unless you&#8217;re a thief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloodthirsty Liberal &#187; Barack&#8217;s Blow Up Doll Blows Up</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/29/obamateurism-of-the-day-324/comment-page-1/#comment-3752823</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloodthirsty Liberal &#187; Barack&#8217;s Blow Up Doll Blows Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=101710#comment-3752823</guid>
		<description>[...] out and out frauds? (I thought they already worked in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out and out frauds? (I thought they already worked in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
