New meme: Fox News got Sherrod fired because its website published a story about her
posted at 8:25 pm on July 28, 2010 by Allahpundit
Politico doesn’t allege that specifically but it’s picking up on a squabble between Fox fan Johnny Dollar and Media Matters, the latter of which naturally is desperate to lay the blame for all of this on FNC’s doorstep but flummoxed by the fact that the network didn’t run the Sherrod clip until after she had resigned. The obvious solution? Focus on the website and blame them for the firing. Follow the link and read JD’s post for background, but in the meantime here’s Fox News VP Michael Clemente offering a mea culpa:
FoxNews.com did run a story about the existence of the video, titled “Video Shows USDA Official Saying She Didn’t Give ‘Full Force’ of Help to White Farmer” at 5:18 p.m. on Monday, an hour and a half before the Agriculture Department announced Sherrod’s resignation.
And Wednesday, Clemente told POLITICO that was a mistake.
“There was a breakdown in the system, and it is being addressed,” he said. “But it must say something about the power of Fox, that a week after she resigned, we’re still talking about this.”
The breakdown occurred following Fox’s afternoon news meeting that day, when Clemente, according to The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz offered the following advice: “Let’s take our time and get the facts straight on this story. Can we get confirmation and comments from Sherrod before going on-air. Let’s make sure we do this right.”
Clemente said he gave the advice in the meeting, not in a memo to staff, and his guidance clearly did not make it down to the reporter and producers who put the story on FoxNews.com.
Fox Nation had the story at 1:43 p.m. but it didn’t break big until Drudge linked to … a CBS story at around 4:30 p.m., 48 minutes before FoxNews.com reportedly published anything. Two points, though. First, didn’t Sherrod say she was told that one of the reasons she had to resign was because she was “going to be on Glenn Beck tonight” (which she wasn’t)? That suggests that the gears were turning to push her out before Beck hit the airwaves at 5 p.m. ET … which was also 18 minutes before FoxNews.com published anything. You have to read waaay down into the Politico article to be reminded of that. Second, as Johnny Dollar noted in replying to Media Matters, if you look at the comments to the original FoxNews.com article, the first one doesn’t appear until 6:22 p.m., more than an hour after Politico claims the article first went live. Er, how can that be? Wouldn’t there have been 64 minutes of comments in there if Politico’s timeline is correct?
Update: Well, well. Don’t look now but Politico’s corrected its story. It was 5:58 when the FoxNews.com story first appeared, not 5:18.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
OK, now Net Neutrality? Perhaps some more FCC oversight when it comes to the Evil www?
MeatHeadinCA on July 28, 2010 at 8:31 PM
What time will they publish her husband’s Uncle Tom rant?
Ronnie on July 28, 2010 at 8:31 PM
Glenn is under their skin.
publiuspen on July 28, 2010 at 8:31 PM
Politico has a bunch of low life Jlisters…should we be surprised?
d1carter on July 28, 2010 at 8:32 PM
Why is Fox apologizing? For what exactly? Their report wasn’t inaccurate and was close to what everyone else aired.
sharrukin on July 28, 2010 at 8:33 PM
Fake, but accurate.
AUINSC on July 28, 2010 at 8:33 PM
Oh for the love of….will this story please die. DIE ALREADY, DIE!!
ramrants on July 28, 2010 at 8:34 PM
But, but, but, look at it from this angle. No, you also have to stand on your head and squint your eyes.
No? Don’t see it yet? Man you racists have no imagination./sarcasm
shick on July 28, 2010 at 8:35 PM
While I can sort of understand why Fox is trying to defend themselves from this ridiculous nonsense (I think I saw more of the Shirley Charade coverage on CNN than Fox), why aren’t people pointing out the obvious? This is nothing more than the Lefty Machine trying to smear the Tea Party, GOP, Conservatives, and Faux News all in one swipe.
MeatHeadinCA on July 28, 2010 at 8:35 PM
Geez! You know what? Not that it matters in the vast scheme of the universe but I am going to take a sabbatical from all of this crap. I will vote Tuesday, straight Republican but I will not look at any news site, political blog or anything remotely related to politics for one week.
I need to air out my mind and soul.
Vince on July 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM
Keep repeating it over and over…fox did it…fox did it..fox…fox…Bush…Bush. Doesn’t matter if it’s true, 100 years from now historians will record it as disputed, controversial, uncertain, unknown, debated.
Skandia Recluse on July 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM
Great! Can they publish some stories about Pelosi and Obama?
Tommy_G on July 28, 2010 at 8:37 PM
Uh hoh please….
Why must we keep pretending she was a victim….?
Shirley Sherrod and her husband clearly don’t like whitey.
Why don’t we discuss the dirt of that lawsuit she just won….?
NeoKong on July 28, 2010 at 8:38 PM
wait, wait, wait. Hold on. So are we supposed to believe that the WH spends all day refreshing the Fox News website to aid in their decision making process?
Do these libs realize how stupid they make Obama look by blaming Fox for this?
Can we start making fun of the President for shivering in the corner and he repeats over and over again, “no, Fox News, Fox News, Glenn Beck, Fox News, no, Fox News, make it stop, Fox News, Hannity is causing me Insanity, Fox News, Fox News, no, no, no, F-F-F-Fox News”.
OK- I’ll go with that.
ramrants on July 28, 2010 at 8:39 PM
Hehehehehe
Now that will be fun
macncheez on July 28, 2010 at 8:40 PM
The truth doesn’t matter. Last week on O’Reilly. he was so proud of the NYT because they supposedly printed a retraction of their story about Rep. Lewis being called racial slurs. But he went on to say was that the NYT said it couldn’t be proven to be a member of the Tea Party. No proof of him being called names at all but maybe the Tea Party folks might not have done it. These people are all crazy.
Cindy Munford on July 28, 2010 at 8:41 PM
Good point. I like Ann Coulter’s take here.
MeatHeadinCA on July 28, 2010 at 8:41 PM
At least CNN has apparently released her, step in the right direction.
Cindy Munford on July 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM
This is silly. Even for liberals. The only person responsible for firing Sherrod is the person (President Obama) who ordered her to be fired without asking for and considering her side of the story.
Basilsbest on July 28, 2010 at 8:47 PM
Baier did a nice job of taking down Howard Dean during Special Report tonight. I thought running the programming on fast forward was effective, stopping at the BOR segment at 8:50 EST or so.
Eat us, Howard. You’re a liar.
BuckeyeSam on July 28, 2010 at 8:47 PM
DITTO!!
Khun Joe on July 28, 2010 at 8:49 PM
Fox News didn’t have anything to do with this firing.
Van Jones, sure, but not the Sherrod thing. Sorry Media Matters.
forest on July 28, 2010 at 8:50 PM
Meh…
Seven Percent Solution on July 28, 2010 at 8:50 PM
He an Rush are living rent free in their heads, great isn`t it!
bluemarlin on July 28, 2010 at 8:53 PM
All kneel before the all- powerful FOX! Look on ye mighty and despair!
/sarc
obladioblada on July 28, 2010 at 8:56 PM
Fox has a lot more impact than we ever imagined. The influence the “Whitehouse” before they run a story?
seven on July 28, 2010 at 8:58 PM
Sherrod got Sherrod fired because she is a racist who use her position of power to deny equal protection and due process under the law. PERIOD.
swamp_yankee on July 28, 2010 at 8:58 PM
Obviously Fox news needs to be brought down if the power of its website is starting to rival Palins Facebook page.
Koa on July 28, 2010 at 8:59 PM
Distract, distract, distract. That’s all
SorosMedia Matters does. Their Messiah was caught overreacting to an anticipated attack by Fox, so they think they can just keep attacking Fox and take the heat off their Messiah.rockmom on July 28, 2010 at 9:00 PM
Every time HotAir has a post about Sherrod instead of JournoGate, they win.
FloatingRock on July 28, 2010 at 9:00 PM
Obama acted stupidly.
profitsbeard on July 28, 2010 at 9:00 PM
I see the oldest comment at Monday, July 19, 2010 at 3:22 PM. Is that because I am on the West coast?
tommylotto on July 28, 2010 at 9:01 PM
+10
MeatHeadinCA on July 28, 2010 at 9:01 PM
Every time Fox News plays defense against false Sherrod accusations instead of going on the offense on JournoGate, they win.
FloatingRock on July 28, 2010 at 9:01 PM
Am I missing something here… Drudge linked to the CBS Story at 4:30 so that was over 45 minutes before the story was posted at Fox. Why the focus on Fox and not cBS?
chickenhawkexpress on July 28, 2010 at 9:02 PM
These guys are so desperate to neutralize Fox News, they are now reduced to making sh– up.
rockmom on July 28, 2010 at 9:02 PM
Maybe
just maybe
this is what happened :
1. When Breitbart published the story with video, the trolls on Sor@$$ payroll e-mailed the WH but did not provide the link
2. WH asked center for American progress for instructions
3. Podesta unleashed his lotion-brigade to do research and come up with talking points for Gibbsy ASAP
4. The lotion-brigade searched for sherrod’s video on youtube and came up with her husband’s speech on uncle tom and white man and elections . They panicked
5. Podesta’s office screamed ” may day may day ”
6. WH found out Sherrods’ relation to Ayers
7. Hussain panicked
macncheez on July 28, 2010 at 9:06 PM
What Dean (Arrrrrrgh) said may not be the truth, but it’s truthy enough for Media Matters.
mchristian on July 28, 2010 at 9:11 PM
FIFY.
Amendment X on July 28, 2010 at 9:16 PM
Geez, what a shock.
Howard Dean is a bald-faced liar.
Who would have thought it.
notagool on July 28, 2010 at 9:16 PM
Propaganda 301. Those scum-scuking marxist bastards of Media Matters are just filling up the airtime with specious accusations, while the racist frauds (Sherrods, et al) duck for cover and hope to keep their billion dollar theft concealed.
It’s an outrage, a perversion, that the mere handful of marxist-progressive crapweasels of Media Matters can divert attention with their deliberate evasions.
rayra on July 28, 2010 at 9:22 PM
This all could have been avoided if someone from the White House would have called Glenn on the red phone and ASKED him if he was going to run the story.
I mean if they are going to let him call the shots the least they could do is talk to him directly to get their marching orders.
Bwahhahahahahahahh
Lily on July 28, 2010 at 9:28 PM
The general population doesn’t care about this story anymore…the only ones who care are the media themselves… I can’t stand Sherrod now… not because of the clip but because of what she did after..she can go you know where for all I care….
CCRWM on July 28, 2010 at 9:34 PM
They need it to be true becuase that is how they figured it would play out. To unleash the full plan they had, FOX was supposed to perform the way gamed it out. It is beyond funny Beck smelled a rat on this story and held back as well which had to have blown their minds.
To conspiracy theory?
bluemarlin on July 28, 2010 at 9:38 PM
Why would the facts need to be consistent?
“Let’s just pick someone and call them racist…”
barnone on July 28, 2010 at 9:38 PM
That’s what the Media Matters crap is all about, just a frantic effort to cover ol’ Howard’s ass.
ddrintn on July 28, 2010 at 9:46 PM
The ones living in the collective heads of the Left:
Limbaugh, Palin, Beck.
On alternating days its either Coulter or Ingraham to make a fourth for bridge.
ajacksonian on July 28, 2010 at 9:46 PM
It is very unpresidential to have a stable of surrogates that are all whiney, name calling cry babies.
snaggletoothie on July 28, 2010 at 9:46 PM
No, here’s what happened: an attempted setup to get Beck, Fox and Breitbart in one fell swoop. The NAACP had the whole clip all along. They knew what was on it even as they were condemning Sherrod. She was a pawn.
ddrintn on July 28, 2010 at 9:48 PM
Before this goes away I would like a Congressional investigation of the USDA black farmer’s scam. That may be the reason the Bamster wanted Shirley to go away so quickly.
slickwillie2001 on July 28, 2010 at 9:50 PM
^ You see, they assumed Beck was going to just hammer away at the racist angle of the Sherrod story, but he didn’t. But they went with it anyway just as if he had.
ddrintn on July 28, 2010 at 9:51 PM
Sure Fox website might of had something up but it does not explain how the documents show Socialist. That is where all the top level of investigation should be at not this missing 18 minutes of tape.
I coin the it foxnews.comgate.
tjexcite on July 28, 2010 at 9:51 PM
The real OUTRAGE in the Shirley Sherrod video is the amount of our tax dollars Sherrod was helping the USDA to spend.
Watch the full version of the video beginning at about 36:29 to hear how much money Sherrod is giving away
http://www.naacp.org/news/entry/video_sherrod/
Why is the U.S.Department of Agriculture providing 100% loans for single family housing to low income people?
- Didn’t they learn anything from the subprime mortgage crisis?
Why is the USDA providing 1% loans of up to $20,000 for home rennovations for senior citizens?
- Helping senior citizens may be a noble goal, but it should not be done by the USDA with our tax dollars!
Sherrod gives away the motive for spending this money when she says: “And you can thank President Obama for that.”
The U.S. Department of Agriculture should not be using our tax dollars to buy votes for President Obama.
The USDA budget obviously has too much money and should be cut!
Shirley Sherrod’s entire department should be fired for misspending our tax dollars!
wren on July 28, 2010 at 10:02 PM
makes sense.
NAACP had this video delivered to AB.
Everything went according to their plan except that
Fox news and Glenn Beck didn’t act the way NAACP and WH were hoping for ..
So now we know who the actual idiots are
haha
macncheez on July 28, 2010 at 10:24 PM
Yep, that’s what I think went down.
ddrintn on July 28, 2010 at 10:44 PM
Does anybody know which network/media/host first report on this story? Like to know if FOX is getting blamed for a story that was reported first somewhere else.
Plus what would this country have looked like if Dean got elected pres? loved when Wallace every time shot him down with Dean’s lies. Than Dean always changed the topic
ChiTownPizza on July 28, 2010 at 11:28 PM
According to Media Matters and most of the MSM…..the White House and NAACP have no ability to think or make decisions on their own….FOX News makes those decisions for them.
…..When the White House and NAACP hold a press conference and admit that FOX News does their decision making for them….then Media Matters will have a point…until then,these liberal shills have no credibility on this issue at all.
Baxter Greene on July 28, 2010 at 11:38 PM
Hilarious ass-whipping for the little sissy Howie.
Jaibones on July 28, 2010 at 11:43 PM
I thought the White House did not pay attention to Fox News. Or is the White House LYING…..again.
GarandFan on July 28, 2010 at 11:50 PM
Has Politico & Media Matters run the video of Sherrod’s husband’s “Uncle Tom” or is he getting excerpted?
TN Mom on July 29, 2010 at 12:30 AM
And unless you watch FOX you still believe everything Dean said. Dean knew he was lying. He also knew the people he was talking to are too narrow to actually get the facts.
fact don’t matter.
Ampersand on July 29, 2010 at 1:34 AM
Oh please give Obama a break.
Keep in mind it was a very hectic day at the Whitehouse, they still had to arrange a PRIVATE jet for Bo, the Whitehouse dog.
That’s not an excuse, just trying to put Obama’s decision “in context”.
DSchoen on July 29, 2010 at 4:49 AM
LIBERALS LIE.
And Media Matters is a hatchet website devoted to SNIPPING, CLIPPING, AND TRIMMING TRANSCRIPTS of conservative media figures to insert their own “context” in between the heavily edited transcript excerpts.
How they think they have moral authority to wag a finger at anyone for “selective editing” or other made up nonsense when their sole reason for existing is to selectively edit and push fake controversies about the right is beyond me.
Good Lt on July 29, 2010 at 8:15 AM
No doubt. He’s living rent free in their heads, as Rush says.
labrat on July 29, 2010 at 10:38 AM
The Journalistas hate FOX because FOX doesn’t live on the hate plantation.
Mojave Mark on July 29, 2010 at 11:32 AM
It’s a simple matter of counter measures to the left’s Alinskyism. All we have to do is let them destroy themselves with their own game. Glenn Beck knows this very well. Also, Glenn’s red phone rang the other day – it wasn’t the WH, it was some guy who happened to get the number off the bottom of the phone when Glenn held it up. They watch. They’re scared sh*tless of Fox just as cockroaches fear daylight.
LarryG on July 29, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Yahoo was first to announce it. CBS was next. Is she going after them as well?
ConservativePartyNow on July 29, 2010 at 12:25 PM
“Fair, balanced and unafraid.”
I like, respect and honor that.
The lamestream media took this initial story and made the spin the focus rather than the substance. If they can tear themselves away from Journolist support group cocktail hour, I would like investigative reporting to answer a few of the who, what, where, and whys.
- Pigford case double the number of claims than actual black farmers?
- Who are the muslims mentioned by her husband?
- Who funded, and funds, her community organizing group?
- Where are all the farm commune people now?
- If they lost the 6,000 acre farm, is her mother’s property a different location?
- What were the reported or court document facts of her father’s death?
- Did her mother’s rise to the highest position in the school board not teach her lessons to the good character of her neighbors or community?
FeFe on July 29, 2010 at 2:03 PM