Collins a no, Lieberman a miss on DISCLOSE vote; Update: Brown says no; Update: Snowe says no — and Feinstein, too; Update: Cloture fails, 57-41
posted at 12:55 pm on July 27, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Harry Reid wanted to push the DISCLOSE Act through the Senate today in a last-ditch effort to get the badly flawed campaign finance bill passed before Congress goes into recess. Fortunately, it appears that the effort may be heading for the ditch. Susan Collins (R-ME) declared last night that she would oppose the bill, ending the last hope of getting Republican support for the cloture vote:
On a conference call with reporters today, Sen. Chuck Schumer said he’s “working very hard on getting a Republican” to support his version of the campaign-finance reform bill known as the Disclose Act. He added that “there are a number of possibilities.”
But with the measure slated for a Senate vote tomorrow, he can cross Sen. Susan Collins of Maine off his list of potential supporters. Collins said through a spokesman this afternoon that she will not support the bill in its current form.
“The bill would provide a clear and unfair advantage to unions, while either shutting other organizations out of the election process or subjecting them to onerous reporting requirements that would not apply to unions,” Collins’ press secretary Kevin Kelley told ABC News.
“Senator Collins also believes that it is ironic that a bill aimed at curtailing special interests in the election process provides so many carve outs and exemptions that favor some grassroots organizations over others. This too is simply unfair.”
There doesn’t appear to be anyone who would take Collins’ place. Now, according to The Corner, Schumer can’t even count on all of his own caucus for support. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) will miss the cloture vote, making it near impossible for Reid and Schumer to get cloture.
What next? As The Hill reports, Reid and Obama need this bill to pacify the Left:
While conservative grassroots enthusiasm has spawned the Tea Party movement, liberal activists have lodged a list of disappointments with their party, including the collapse of the public healthcare option and climate change legislation, the decision to boost troop levels in Afghanistan and the continued operation of the Guantánamo Bay prison camp.
The campaign finance bill is a top concern for liberals, who want lawmakers to take a strong stand against corporate special interests, such as health insurance companies, investment banks and oil companies.
Except, of course, that the bill is filled with exceptions to the restrictions. Unions and establishment interest groups won’t have to deal with the DISCLOSE Act’s limitations, but newer grassroots organizations will have to live within its boundaries. It’s a shameless pander to unions and big special interest groups, and is almost certainly unconstitutional anyway. It’s best aspect is that it’s an appeasement to the Democratic base that has angrily denounced their leadership.
If Lieberman is a no show, Reid will have to pull the bill back. It’s doubtful that it will come back again before the election if he does, but vigilance will be necessary to ensure its defeat.
Update: Lindsey Graham’s also a no, via the Boss Emeritus.
Update II: The Daily Caller has more on Lieberman’s absence:
Lieberman is attending a funeral service and will not be in Washington, spokeswoman Erika Masonhall said.
The odds of passage for DISCLOSE were already low, with all Republicans but one — Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine — certain to vote against it. But there was still hope for some on the left that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, would be able to pull together the votes.
But Lieberman’s absence means that even if Snowe were to vote for the bill, Reid would still be one vote short.
Update III: Scott Brown announced his opposition on Twitter.
Update IV: This should put a stake through the heart of DISCLOSE:
Moderate Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, just told reporters she will not support proceeding with debate on a campaign finance bill, known as the DISCLOSE Act, a move that signals the end of the road for this legislation for now.
Complaining that there have been “no hearings, no vetting, no attempt to bring people together,” Snowe touted her own past work on the issue and added, “I know the new routine on legislation these days is to ram and jam…but it really does take time…It really does require building a consensus.”
Meanwhile, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-CA, a gun control advocate, said she will support Democratic leaders’ effort to start debate on the legislation, but spokesman Gil Duran says the senator will not support the bill on final passage. And Feinstein told reporters moments ago that if today’s vote were one to shut off debate and move to final passage, she, too, would be a ‘no’ vote.
Feinstein would oppose it? Dude, it’s dead.
Update (AP): Graham, Collins, Brown, and Snowe answer the bell and a united GOP front sends DISCLOSE down to defeat, 57-41. Can I get a “whoooooa RINOS”?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
I won’t believe it until the bill fails in a floor vote or is withdrawn. You cannot trust these people.
Missy on July 27, 2010 at 12:58 PM
At least one of the dingbats from Maine (Collins) is on the right side this time.
Ward Cleaver on July 27, 2010 at 12:58 PM
Just deem it passed so the nation can move one step closer to Utopia. Stupid Republicans, failing to see the wisdom of a union-controlled country.
Bishop on July 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM
Geez! Their efforts to guarantee a permanent ruling class are getting more transparent every day…
Ace ODale on July 27, 2010 at 1:01 PM
+1
Extrafishy on July 27, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Amen to that!
milwife88 on July 27, 2010 at 1:01 PM
A cautious HURRAH! Thanks for the update, Ed.
Firefly_76 on July 27, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Update: Lindsey Graham’s also a no, via the Boss Emeritus.
Sadly, this needs saying.
Akzed on July 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM
ditto
cmsinaz on July 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM
What about the other two Republicrats… Snowe and Brown? I think i can see 60 votes from my house.
CC
CapedConservative on July 27, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Funny how we have to confirm whether Graham is a sure vote.
Apologetic California on July 27, 2010 at 1:08 PM
I dont trust these “head counts”. I don’t trust Graham. I don’t trust Collins. I don’t trust anybody.
rrpjr on July 27, 2010 at 1:13 PM
Breaking News
====================
Collins temporarily regains
her sanity…… …(sarc).
canopfor on July 27, 2010 at 1:13 PM
Brown’s a no vote.
Firefly_76 on July 27, 2010 at 1:16 PM
Is the NRA still an exception?
a capella on July 27, 2010 at 1:18 PM
I guess the standing ovation for the insult to the Supreme Court isn’t working out so well. Darn.
Cindy Munford on July 27, 2010 at 1:20 PM
Yep, just give these all day suckers an all day sucker like this “bill”, and they will suddenly be happy as clams.
Del Dolemonte on July 27, 2010 at 1:21 PM
It will never be defeated on the floor because the leadership never brings to the floor what they do not have the votes to pass.
Harry will withdraw it and rework it until one of the squishy Republicans feels comfortable supporting it(i.e.gets something in return for their vote), then Harry will offer it for a vote.
This gamesmanship is sickening, but it is the way things are done in DC.
Jvette on July 27, 2010 at 1:21 PM
This is so abhorrent to the Constitution, why does it take so long to say “no”? When they take their oath of office to defend the constitution, rather than say “I do”, they follow Pelosi’s lead and say, “You’re kidding, right?”
cartooner on July 27, 2010 at 1:22 PM
Twitter feeds are saying Snowe is NO.
Wethal on July 27, 2010 at 1:22 PM
is Scotty Brown going to save Harry’s bacon? hope not…
ted c on July 27, 2010 at 1:22 PM
Senatus.
Wethal on July 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM
Collins and Snowe are turning out to be some kind of tag team. I’ll vote for this one if you vote for the next one. Kind of keeps them from being consistently offensive does it not.
jeanie on July 27, 2010 at 1:26 PM
is Scotty Brown going to save Harry’s bacon? hope not…
ted c on July 27, 2010 at 1:22 PM
ted c: *Echoes sentiment*–Ugh!:)
canopfor on July 27, 2010 at 1:29 PM
I think maybe McConnell got it through the RINOs thick skulls that voting for this act could mean trouble for their individual re-elections when lefty groups can buy lots of ads. Nothing like self-interest to motivate politicians.
Wethal on July 27, 2010 at 1:31 PM
Firefly’s link to the Boston Herald says Brown is a NO.
Wethal on July 27, 2010 at 1:32 PM
FTFT
Rae on July 27, 2010 at 1:33 PM
Can the healing with the NRA begin yet?
TexasDan on July 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM
You have an odd sense of humor.
TexasDan on July 27, 2010 at 1:35 PM
Honestly, Snowe, Collins (and Brown) are all about how premature the bill is, and unfair in its current form. How about patently unconstitutional?!!?? What part of “Congress shall make no law…” is so difficult for these people to comprehend?
Firefly_76 on July 27, 2010 at 1:35 PM
What a difference a vote makes. How did the land get to here? Constantly hanging on a pivot…
Schadenfreude on July 27, 2010 at 1:37 PM
Correct. Adjustment will be made, Brown or Snowe will switch, and it passes in the next few days.
rrpjr on July 27, 2010 at 1:37 PM
Not for me. Too soon.
Cindy Munford on July 27, 2010 at 1:38 PM
It would have to go back to the House for another vote, which adjourns at the end of this week, not that Nancy wouldn’t hold them over for this.
Brown specifically said he didn’t like the carve-outs for unions and other groups such as the NRA. I can’t see Harry giving those up. That would level the playing field, and he wants it tilted in favor of Dem-supporting groups.
Wethal on July 27, 2010 at 1:42 PM
I swear, as I was reading that I was expecting this to follow:
“The funeral event has been planned for sometime and is not related in anyway to the DISCLOSE Act cloture vote don’t read this it sounds stupid how do you plan a funeral in advance.”
BobMbx on July 27, 2010 at 1:52 PM
Broken clock theory proved correct once again.
angryed on July 27, 2010 at 1:54 PM
Appreciate the correction. I was being a bit glib, as this has been the past pattern. Reid may be able to make cosmetic concessions that don’t level playing field but still allow squishers like Snowe to squish, which is what they really like to do.
rrpjr on July 27, 2010 at 1:56 PM
Snowe and Collins are media whores. This is their game. Say no to Reid. Get on P.1 of the NY Times. Reid comes and begs for a yes vote, another day on P.1. finally they say yes and get a P.1 glowing headline.
Rinse repeat.
Scotty Brown seems to have found the same playbook unfortunately.
angryed on July 27, 2010 at 2:04 PM
canopfor on July 27, 2010 at 1:29 PM
=====================
Firefly’s link to the Boston Herald says Brown is a NO.
Wethal on July 27, 2010 at 1:32 PM
Wethal: That link was July 14th,lets hope so!!:)
canopfor on July 27, 2010 at 2:07 PM
Scott Brown was claiming a “no” vote on facebook…
NTWR on July 27, 2010 at 2:10 PM
Just in case and to make me feel better–would this be un-Constitutional and would it be challenged if it passed?
jeanie on July 27, 2010 at 2:11 PM
Ed Morrissey was claiming a “Yes” vote on his facebook.
Of course, it could just be a rumor…
percysunshine on July 27, 2010 at 2:12 PM
If Snowe votes for this bill, she needs to be kicked out on her stupid ass.
GarandFan on July 27, 2010 at 2:18 PM
Just a rhetorical thought…I wonder if the firearms manufacturing industry is union.
Big John on July 27, 2010 at 2:20 PM
I can’t believe it is as close as it is- are there only unions and union members in Dem districts? No businesses that would like a law that lets them get their message about the consequences of the election out for their side?
Have the Dems become this anti business that they can’t see the unfairness of the laws they are creating? How do they expect business to keep making money for them to take ala Jones comment about Halliburton at the Netroots convention- that we shouldn’t worry about deficits, that we have plenty of money, if you don’t believe me,ask Halliburton implying that it is the government’s money to take? Are all of the communists? really? Or are some being blackmailed by other members? Should the DOJ/IG be investigating Congress for intimidation and blackmail?
journeyintothewhirlwind on July 27, 2010 at 2:21 PM
If they hold the vote, watch for Lieberman to join the ranks. He’s as unprincipled as the rest of them are…and would probably be more than happy to have a law that favors his beliefs, and trounces on those who don’t share his ideology.
HOLD THE LINE REPUBLICANS. If you don’t, it will be the demise of any opposition party in this country, and we’ll be stuck with these power hungry morons for eons.
capejasmine on July 27, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Seems like we are having to melt the phone lines to defeat a disastrous major bill every time we turn around.
This truly evil, brazenly free-speech chilling “DISCLOSE Act” needs to be choked at the neck and never resuscitated. It is fully designed to reelect Democrats until the Supreme Court finds it unconstitutional in a few years, and hamstring Republicans via unfettered union spending — not to mention its direct 1st Amendment assault.
Even the ACLU is urging a no vote on it!
After this beast of a bill gets safely blocked for these Fall elections, Dems MUST, MUST, MUST be beaten in November. Anyone reading this, please pull your weight to help ensure a badly needed November Democrat beat-down.
Edouard on July 27, 2010 at 2:42 PM
http://www.chuckingschumer.com
Connie on July 27, 2010 at 2:49 PM
what’s this ‘voting’? I thought we just ‘deem’ stuff now?
tommer74 on July 27, 2010 at 3:13 PM
Stroke her, Harry, Scottie too while you’re at it.
Kissmygrits on July 27, 2010 at 3:16 PM
Wouldn’t you just LOVE to see Jim Demint (also of SC. ) put a (proverbial) beat down , on Lindsay Grahmnesty?
Offhanded on July 27, 2010 at 3:26 PM
Snowe is a no.
gmerits on July 27, 2010 at 3:31 PM
*SNORT*. Captain Ed has such a way with words. Better put the latex gloves on before you start poking around in the rank orifices of that bestial cadaver’s clothing, though, Mr. Morrisey. Since the DISCLOSE monster was the creation of the unholy trinity of Feingold, Schumer & Leahy, no telling where that thing has been!
leilani on July 27, 2010 at 3:37 PM
Your prediction came true, according to Politico – at least for the Cloture vote.
As far as I can tell, though, Snowe is still a No.
leilani on July 27, 2010 at 3:40 PM
More like she hasn’t added enough of her own crap to it yet.
BobMbx on July 27, 2010 at 3:51 PM
No. More like Feinstein is up reelection in November, 2012 and sees the way Boxer is going and doesn’t want to give Republicans any ammo while she’s got the albatross of a one-time Obama presidency tied to her neck.
Sultry Beauty on July 27, 2010 at 4:03 PM
Thank goodness. But who smells a rat? A deal for a vote?
csdeven on July 27, 2010 at 4:03 PM
So Snowe gets to vote no on DISCLOSE but will vote yes on something coming?
d1carter on July 27, 2010 at 4:16 PM
Re media whores, yes the fair ladies of Maine are worse than Chuckie Schumer. Seeing them primp and bloviate in the halls of Congress with a semicircle of cameras around them makes me throw up. I wonder if we would have better government if we allowed reporters inside the buildings, but no cameras.
Besides, Collins babytalk voice is too much to take.
slickwillie2001 on July 27, 2010 at 4:20 PM
Sure, I’ll give it a woot-woot. Now keep them cheeks puckered, Rino’s, we got a lame duck session to get through.
Dusty on July 27, 2010 at 4:40 PM
it’s too bad we have to rely upon these three….
ted c on July 27, 2010 at 4:42 PM
“What part of ‘Congress shall make no law… ‘ do they not get?”
Rae on July 27, 2010 at 4:43 PM
Ahh I love the sweet smell of Democratic defeat.
But let’s not get cocky yet, we’ve still got to win a landslide in November and stop the Lameduck session
Cookies Mom on July 27, 2010 at 4:44 PM
Waitaminnit. Dingy Harry voted nay? WTF.
Fat Jolly Penguin on July 27, 2010 at 4:44 PM
That’s what bothers me too. I’m glad this looks like it won’t pass but saying things like “in its current form” or there being “no attempt to build consensus” is either weasel-talk explaining why she voted against it, or even worse, it means that they don’t have a problem with the IDEA itself, just this particular FORM of the idea, and that they’re mad that they weren’t offered the usual bribe to go along with getting their vote.
DrAllecon on July 27, 2010 at 4:45 PM
I think she didn’t want to give the NRA the exception, they’re her mortal enemies. I was thinking of phoning her office and asking her to oppose it for that reason.
Socratease on July 27, 2010 at 4:46 PM
Looks that way, doesn’t it? Reid was the only (D) Nay vote. from the tally linked at the end of the post.
It might have been accidental, since Reid was a Nay twice on Health Care votes if I recall, only having to scramble back and change his vote before voting closed.
Whatever, I’m just so relieved right now at this outcome.
Edouard on July 27, 2010 at 4:49 PM
I’m guessing the old fart either screwed up when voting, or it’s to pad his resume, to say….see? I didn’t vote for this debacle. Look what a good senator I am. All political!!!
capejasmine on July 27, 2010 at 4:55 PM
Just read that Reid’s lone Democrat “Nay” cloture vote allowed him to make a motion to reconsider the vote. So this thing is not entirely dead and Ed counsels well that we have to remain vigilant on this thing.
Edouard on July 27, 2010 at 4:57 PM
United GOP front. I love the sound of that. Sweet music. If we get through til November and passed the lame duck session without more damage to the Republic, the United GOP front is what historians 100 years from now will right about.
journeyintothewhirlwind on July 27, 2010 at 4:57 PM
3 votes.
We were THREE votes away from destroying the first amendment.
And they’re going to keep trying.
Skywise on July 27, 2010 at 4:58 PM
write
journeyintothewhirlwind on July 27, 2010 at 4:58 PM
Reid (D-NV) was a nay.
LOL
meMC on July 27, 2010 at 4:59 PM
Just like he did with the first tries at the Health Care Bill…
Skywise on July 27, 2010 at 4:59 PM
But if those three were not there, in light of the demographics of their respective states, we would have had 3 democrats voting for that bill in lockstep with their majority leader all the way down the line . No ifs ands or buts. That’s the only alternative to those three available to us in those states.
The reality is that we’re effen L U C K Y to have them give us whatever crumbs we can get from them given the ideology of the vast majority of the people they’ve taken the oath to represent in Washington. Somebody on our side deserves some serious credit for holding the straight-R line under very difficult circumstances.
leilani on July 27, 2010 at 5:02 PM
So, wasn’t this legislation developed to take the place of prior legislation that was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court? You know, the same one the President referred to when rudely calling out members of the Supreme Court who were in attendance at his last state of the union address? And where most of the democrat members of congress stood and applauded in their faces?
I would say that this is a hard SLAP across the Presidents smug mug and a total rebuke of the democrats power grab!
Way to go RINO’s! Bout time!
glennbo on July 27, 2010 at 5:03 PM
Why didn’t Ensign vote?
Western_Civ on July 27, 2010 at 5:04 PM
Disclose 2: the Bribe Wars.
How many billions in tax dollars in earmarks will this cost us taxpayers to get this passed the next time ?
William Amos on July 27, 2010 at 5:19 PM
yes, they will
cmsinaz on July 27, 2010 at 5:23 PM
Exactly. Anytime I hear “in its current form” I shudder. It will be back.
Missy on July 27, 2010 at 5:26 PM
Oh, Yes, my friends, it’s Humpbot time!
OneVision on July 27, 2010 at 5:34 PM
Free speech to Democrats:
fossten on July 27, 2010 at 5:38 PM
Yes, Humpbot! Humpbot! Humpbot!
Who is John Galt on July 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM
Yep.
Try and run someone more conservative in Massachsuetts. Just try. Despite all the whining. Brown has slowed a lot of things down and kept Reid from bringing many pieces to the floor. If Coakley were there, this along with many other things would be law.
swamp_yankee on July 27, 2010 at 5:47 PM
Trot out the deem it done.
Kissmygrits on July 27, 2010 at 5:49 PM
I’m thinking about starting a RINO appreciation society.
Seriously, although they truly do drive us up the wall all the time, if they didn’t exist we’d simply have that many more lockstep Democrats driving the whole country straight off the cliff. Permanently.
leilani on July 27, 2010 at 6:01 PM
It’s nice to know that even those four big wussies can get on the right side of the question once in awhile.
disa on July 27, 2010 at 6:03 PM
Not even then, Missy. Not even then.
disa on July 27, 2010 at 6:04 PM
RINOS. Its really about who they represent.
I have no problem with anyone as long as they vote to the Right of their constiuents. Scott Brown is not an ideologue on a suicide mission. Of course he wnats to be re-elected. His consituents are liberal, as long as he pulls the state GOP to the Right, the state to the Right and Congress to the Right, I’m fine.
What’s worse are people who legislate to the Left of their constituents like Graham and the old McCain. And Lugar.
swamp_yankee on July 27, 2010 at 6:08 PM
It’s procedural so that he can bring back to the floor at a later date.
Cindy Munford on July 27, 2010 at 6:17 PM
Love to be a fly on the wall of Reid’s office right about now. Especially when his union bosses start phoning in their displeasure and their demands to PUSH CARD CHECK NOW!
GarandFan on July 27, 2010 at 6:21 PM
Most of the Senate RINO’s are not up for election in 2010. Voinovich is another wobbly one, but he is retiring this year.
Dasher on July 27, 2010 at 6:35 PM
Reid’s vote was procedural. It allows him to bring it up for another vote later. Which means he knew it would fail by the time he voted.
amerpundit on July 27, 2010 at 6:40 PM
Were you trying to mock me, Percy? ‘Cause I was right. Don’t try to mess with my facebook ninja powers, yo, you’ll end up getting schooled.
NTWR on July 27, 2010 at 6:47 PM
FEINSTAIN!?!? Does that mean she’s worth calling over such things now???
NTWR on July 27, 2010 at 6:48 PM
I can’t believe Reid, the weasel, voted NO. The sad part is that thousands of NV voters will be too ignorant to understand the circumstances.
He pushes it, when he knows he’s lost, he jumps on teh NO bandwagon and he’ll parade around NV as some moderate who broke with his party.
swamp_yankee on July 27, 2010 at 6:52 PM
All of this to hold 80% of the country hostage to the lunatic Liberal 20%? We need to elect at least 5 more Republican to the Senate in November to be insurance against the Maine sisters, Graham and Brown… and one more just in case!
CCRWM on July 27, 2010 at 6:55 PM
Now that’s a good solid B+ !
huskerdiva on July 27, 2010 at 6:59 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »