Video: What CNN misses on loan-modification programs
posted at 1:36 pm on July 26, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
CNN offers this look at mortgage modification efforts in the private sector, and then misses the entire point by insisting that Washington needs to do more to help. Sandra Endo reports from the floor of a massive convention that brings borrowers, lenders, and counselors together to attempt to salvage mortgages and keep people making payments on their homes. Endo rightly notes that the Obama administration’s efforts on this score have hardly made an impact, but fails to understand why:
The answer to this is simple, and it’s even explained by the BofA representative interviewed in the clip. Banks and investors lose when homes go into foreclosure. It’s better for everyone to readjust term, if the borrower can meet any kind of rational terms for the mortgage. Otherwise, the home will lose a large percentage of its value, and investors will take a large loss on the property rather than just make smaller gains over the long term.
The main problem has been unwinding the mortgage-based securities issued through Fannie and Freddie to get clarity on investment ownership. Each mortgage had literally hundreds or thousands of investors, who previously would all have to agree on modification terms. The administration needed to change those terms to give banks more leeway in negotiations. Otherwise, the only benefit they could provide would be to remind people to talk to their lenders if they get in trouble. Those whose mortgages can be rescued will be rescued, whether in forums seen here or in one-on-one negotiations, because it serves everyone’s interests to keep the homeowner making payments.
So who would get served by a government bailout? Mainly people who can’t live with reasonable terms. Taxpayer money will go into extending these loans in the hope that the homeowners can somehow figure out where to get more money, but in the end most will fail. Instead of letting the market make that determination up front, the Obama administration is playing kick the can with taxpayer money, and in the end the market makes the determination anyway.
Update: Ah, the pitfalls of relying on spell check. Of course, the headline should have been loan modification, not load. Sorry about that.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Freudian title slip, Ed? heh
ted c on July 26, 2010 at 1:38 PM
I want my load modified, too.
fred5678 on July 26, 2010 at 1:39 PM
So buying things I can’t afford is a bad thing? I just don’t understand, but I’m sure racism is involved. s/
Mojave Mark on July 26, 2010 at 1:41 PM
Soooo, Ed. How was Vegas again?
heh
ted c on July 26, 2010 at 1:41 PM
Obama’s standard response to ANY problem:
Hmmm. Needs more Government!
VelvetElvis on July 26, 2010 at 1:41 PM
Funny….I read it and saw “loan”…
right2bright on July 26, 2010 at 1:42 PM
I think the term we’re looking for here is “pantload-modification.”
Mr. D on July 26, 2010 at 1:43 PM
Can you imagine the state of these homes and what an “asset” to the neighborhood they are? Not only can’t these folks not make mortgage payments but it costs money keep a house up. Future suburban blight everywhere in the nation. There is no stigma in renting or do people expect you to pay there also?
Cindy Munford on July 26, 2010 at 1:44 PM
Was Monica Lewinsky a load-modifier?
i’ll stop.
ted c on July 26, 2010 at 1:44 PM
Typos are the funny. It’s a dirty load!
kahall on July 26, 2010 at 1:44 PM
Freudian greatness…
hungrymongo on July 26, 2010 at 1:45 PM
Sounds like an intervention program for Al “Chakra” Gore.
MNHawk on July 26, 2010 at 1:45 PM
plz don’t
;-)
macncheez on July 26, 2010 at 1:45 PM
Was Monica Lewinsky a load-modifier?
i’ll stop.
ted c on July 26, 2010 at 1:44 PM
How about that babe and algore’s second chakra?
lukespapa on July 26, 2010 at 1:47 PM
that masseuse must’ve been a banker. She refused his request to have his chakra load-modified.
ted c on July 26, 2010 at 1:48 PM
Perfect. The O Administration reconstitutes your load, re-wraps your load with a nice bright bow, and lets you have it back to stink up your life anew.
Edouard on July 26, 2010 at 1:49 PM
You just need to look at Detroit and it’s suburbs to see what all of these sub prime loans will lead to. One by one, houses are foreclosed on and in time entire neighborhoods are gone, because no one wants to live in an empty neighborhood. There is no one there to watch the neighborhood, nobody to keep the lawns up, no people or money to keep the houses in good repair, etc. This is all a direct result of people being loaned money to buy houses that they could never hope to pay for. Everyone thought the market would go on forever and people would be able to refinance with interest only loans and flip houses for the next couple of decades or so.
Johnnyreb on July 26, 2010 at 1:50 PM
No Tim Geithner, you’ve propped up the housing prices once again and have not allowed them to fall to real world market values.
Which in the long run just extends this problem years into the future.
ButterflyDragon on July 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM
Naive, squared. Have we not learned anything?
faraway on July 26, 2010 at 1:52 PM
This sounds more like a Bill Clinton program…
PatriotRider on July 26, 2010 at 1:53 PM
What a load.
meandchi on July 26, 2010 at 1:55 PM
Aren’t those conventions usually held in bank lobbies with loud bull horns and lots of jumping up and down?
kahall on July 26, 2010 at 1:57 PM
Mo needs a load modification.
Ronnie on July 26, 2010 at 1:58 PM
Being in IT, I thought you guys were poking fun at CNN’s tech team when it came up on Twitter. Oh well :)
spkthed on July 26, 2010 at 2:01 PM
I thought this was a program to reduce capacity charges by “load” shifting via consumer time of day electrical rates. Instead it was about loans. What a difference one letter makes.
KW64 on July 26, 2010 at 2:04 PM
I modified a load this morning…..whew….broke a sweat too.
ted c on July 26, 2010 at 2:04 PM
Did you see the gorilla?
ExpressoBold on July 26, 2010 at 2:08 PM
What gorilla…that was funny, and clever…
right2bright on July 26, 2010 at 2:13 PM
The administration keeps on modifying the load they are trying to feed us. The MSM’s term for it is “hard pivot.”
29Victor on July 26, 2010 at 2:13 PM
Ed modified “Load.” Ironic.
29Victor on July 26, 2010 at 2:14 PM
I anticipate we may see more “load-modification programs” in the future……///
ted c on July 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM
Load of bullplop…
wonk-a-donk on July 26, 2010 at 2:16 PM
Oh, it’s a load all right!
CurtZHP on July 26, 2010 at 2:26 PM
I sure as hell hope the woman they interviewed is not going to pay for that appraisal she said was the next step. Any legit real estate agent will give her a free market analysis. Since she already seems to know she’s underwater, or thinks she is, go the free route first.
Refinancing can be a scam. You really have to do the math to figure out if it’s in your best interests.
My first house had a mortgage rate of 10 1/4%. After 5 years the rate was down around 7%. I was all set to refinance until I actually sat down with the papers and looked at the numbers. Home values had also dropped, so my house was worth about what I owed on the mortgage. The new loan had a lower rate, and lower monthly payaments, but it was a 30 year loan. So not only did I lose the $10K down payment, the fees and points made the principle more than what I owed after paying the mortgage for 5 years.
I looked around and decided to sell and buy another house. I bought a bigger, nicer house in a better neighborhood and my mortgage went up about 20 bucks a month. I had to take money out of my 401K to do it, but it paid off in the end.
Jaynie59 on July 26, 2010 at 2:30 PM
BTW, Bruce Marks is a well-known socialist agitator and shekedown artist who was largely responsible for forcing many lenders as well as Fannie and Freddie to invest in more “affordable” loans, which is what got us into this mess. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry seeing him in this video, when he ought to be in prison.
rockmom on July 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Debt load getting heavy. Media worries by pressing the government to increase the load. Taxpayers sigh under the weight. Congress yawns, Obama golfs. All is well.
midlander on July 26, 2010 at 2:35 PM
People line up for loan-modification events like this one because people like Bruce Marks are spreading misleading propaganda among minority communities that they can get their mortgage “eliminated” or some “free government money” to help them pay their mortgages. They sell them a story that they all got “predatory” and “racist” loans from “the big banks” and so they “deserve” to have them written off and the banks can “afford” to do this because Obama bailed them out.
rockmom on July 26, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Sometimes a ‘Freudian Slip’ like this is closer to the truth than the ‘correct’ headline…
landlines on July 26, 2010 at 2:40 PM
Fix the damned job market and this problem goes away.
tcn on July 26, 2010 at 3:24 PM
Sandra Endo is a moron.
moochy on July 26, 2010 at 3:29 PM
To assume that the majority of the loans that are defaulting right now are only subprime loans is to completely misunderstand the scope of what’s going on with the real estate market.
75% (three-quarters!!) of the 5 – 7 million loans that are currently 90 days or more delinquent were originally packaged as “traditional prime”.
The lesson? Calling a loan “prime”, does not a prime loan make.
Traditionally, a prime loan has 4 main characteristics:
1. 20% down payment.
2. Low debt ratio (call it less than 30%).
3. Verified income (that means 2 years tax returns evidencing “adjusted gross income” for self-employed folks and W2/paystubs for the rest of us).
4. Fixed interest rate.
If a loan does not have those 4 things, it should not be called prime in the first place. I’m NOT saying that only prime loans should be allowed, but only loans that fit those parameters should carry the “prime” designation.
The vast majority of the loans done from 2000 – 2008 did not remotely fit that definition… however they were tagged as prime and bought by Fannie/Freddie by the TRILLIONS.
By guaranteeing a buyer (Fannie/Freddie) for every mortgage loan, the gov’t skewed the market and caused the price of homes to skyrocket… just like it causes the price of college to skyrocket when everyone can get a student loan.
Therefore, from 2000 – 2008, homes were over-priced. Any collateralized loan that was given based on an over-priced asset is a bad loan by nature.
Bottom line, the faux-prime bubble has burst and we should not try to reinflate it, even if we could figure out a way to do it.
Let the free-market work (that means NO manipulation by the gov’t of the interest rates, tax code and underwriting guidelines to increase the sale of homes) and eventually things will get back to a healthy normal supply/demand market and maybe we will avoid making the same mistake again.
Yeah, you are right… that last part ain’t gonna happen.
painesright on July 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM
Recently, a bill was proposed that would require a minimum 5% down payment on a house to qualify for a Fannie or Freddie mortgage.
And Chris Dodd (remember him?) opposed the bill because “passage of such a requirement would restrict home ownership to only those who can afford it.“
Well, we can’t have that can we?
Ready for recession into depression brought to you by the finest minds in economics?
Amendment X on July 26, 2010 at 4:24 PM
Oops. seems Sen. Dodd did NOT say that.
However, in supporting the CRA and Fannie and Freddie, that was what he WAS thinking a few years back.
Amendment X on July 26, 2010 at 4:29 PM
I actually refinanced my loan with Freddie due to Obama’s program. I wasn’t in any trouble and didn’t need to do so; but with a guaranteed lower rate I’d be stupid to throw away all of our tax money the government was offering me. Thanks Obama, you dipshit.
gash on July 26, 2010 at 9:28 PM