Maureen Dowd hints: The White House had a role in pushing Sherrod out

posted at 12:27 pm on July 25, 2010 by Allahpundit

Great catch by Tom Maguire of a tidbit buried in MoDo’s crude, racially reductive attempt to blame l’affaire Sherrod on the “overprotective white guys” who surround The One. It’s unclear from what she writes whether anyone called the White House before Sherrod was forced to resign or only later that day after it happened, but I’d sure like to know the timeline. Was it Vilsack’s decision to let her go and, even if it was, if the White House had reason to believe that the initial clip was fishy before he canned her, why didn’t they reach out and tell him to exercise caution?

The West Wing white guys who pushed to ditch Shirley Sherrod before Glenn Beck could pounce not only didn’t bother to Google, they weren’t familiar enough with civil rights history to recognize the name Sherrod. And they didn’t return the calls and e-mail of prominent blacks who tried to alert them that something was wrong

“I’ve known these two individuals — the husband for more than 50 years and the wife for at least 35, 40 — and there’s not a racist hair on their heads or anyplace else on their bodies,” [Rep. John] Lewis said…

“The president’s getting hurt real bad,” Clyburn told me. “He needs some black people around him.” He said Obama’s inner circle keeps “screwing up” on race: “Some people over there are not sensitive at all about race. They really feel that the extent to which he allows himself to talk about race would tend to pigeonhole him or cost him support, when a lot of people saw his election as a way to get the issue behind us. I don’t think people elected him to disengage on race. Just the opposite.”

Imagine the reaction of America’s first black president, who famously spent time in Chicago as a community organizer, opening his copy of the Times today to find that Manhattanite caricature Maureen Dowd doesn’t think he’s sensitive enough to racial concerns. Same for Valerie Jarrett, one of The One’s top advisors, whose counsel on racial matters is evidently suspect because she lived in Iran until she was, um, five. In fact, file this one away for future use: According to one of the NYT’s resident Pulitzer-winners, the entire brain trust of this very Democratic, very liberal White House — Obama, Jarrett, Axelrod, Emanuel, Biden, Gibbs, on down — is racially tone-deaf. Good to know.

As for the rest of it, and as usual for MoDo, I’m not quite sure what her point is. John Lewis’s argument is clear enough — he knows the Sherrods and could have told Axelrod, Vilsack, etc., that the stuff in the initial clip didn’t sound like her — but I don’t see what having more black advisors surrounding Obama would have accomplished in handling the early uproar over the tape. Is Clyburn suggesting that a black advisor would have been more sensitive to the possibility that she was being taken out of context? The Anchoress managed to be pretty darned sensitive about that and, last I checked, she’s white (and conservative!). In fact, Dowd and Clyburn actually end up letting Obama’s team off the hook by suggesting that they can’t be expected to exercise due diligence when handling a racial hot potato because of their racial make-up. Per MoDo, it’s not that Rahm and Axelrod should take a deep breath and try not to wet their pants the next time they’re forced to wade into some racial subject, it’s that they’re incapable of doing so and therefore need lots more advice from black aides. Note her advice to Obama on Sherrod: “He should give her a new job: Director of Black Outreach. This White House needs one.” The first black president needs a director of outreach to a community among whom he usually polls well above 90 percent?

For a shrewder take on why Obama dropped the ball in the Sherrod case, try this piece by David Ignatius. The teleprompter president doesn’t like venturing off-script, so when he gets surprised by some volatile, unpredictable media clusterfark, his instinct naturally is to make it go away as quickly as possible. Exit quotation:

A man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House. The Post had run an article saying that with his dry intellect, Obama would be happier on the Supreme Court than in the Oval Office. The insider nodded his head. “That’s true,” he said.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

but I don’t see what having more black advisors surrounding Obama would have accomplished in handling the early uproar over the tape.

Obama could have been in the audience of the NAACP and the outcome would still have been the same.

Electrongod on July 25, 2010 at 12:31 PM

“The president’s getting hurt real bad,” Clyburn told me. “He needs some black people around him.” He said Obama’s inner circle keeps “screwing up” on race.

Michelle Obama isn’t part of the inner circle? And after Blago said the One was hen-pecked?

Wethal on July 25, 2010 at 12:31 PM

John Lewis’s argument is clear enough — he knows the Sherrods and could have told Axelrod, Vilsack, etc., that the stuff in the initial clip didn’t sound like her…

I dunno. Her later comments sounded pretty darned bigoted.

irishspy on July 25, 2010 at 12:37 PM

“I can no more disown Rev. Wright Sherrod than I can disown the Black Community”
Must have been the other half that reacted so quickly.

Electrongod on July 25, 2010 at 12:37 PM

“Manhattanite caricature”
That phrasing alone should be enough for a Pulitzer.

cynccook on July 25, 2010 at 12:41 PM

I dunno. Her later comments sounded pretty darned bigoted.

irishspy on July 25, 2010 at 12:37 PM

No kidding. The more she speaks, the clearer it is that she is a huge bigot.

strictnein on July 25, 2010 at 12:41 PM

I think it is just great that we elected a black guy president so we can stop talking about race all the time. Does anybody else notice that all discussion of race and racism has gone away since obambi’s election?
/

VegasRick on July 25, 2010 at 12:44 PM

A man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House

It’s okay. They’ll only be stuck together a couple more years.

KingGold on July 25, 2010 at 12:44 PM

Dear Leader’s inner circle suffers from Beckaphobia.

trubble on July 25, 2010 at 12:44 PM

A man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House. The Post had run an article saying that with his dry intellect, Obama would be happier on the Supreme Court than in the Oval Office. The insider nodded his head. “That’s true,” he said.

That’s good news. Not only does he hate this Country…he hates his job too!

repvoter on July 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM

Is Clyburn suggesting that a black advisor would have been more sensitive to the possibility that she was being taken out of context?

Is the converse true too? Should the NAACP leaders have had more (or even one) white advisor to help them discern the context of the majority of the TEA Party?

SouthernRoots on July 25, 2010 at 12:46 PM

Dear Leader’s inner circle suffers from Beckaphobia.

trubble on July 25, 2010 at 12:44 PM

Truly stunning how “little” these people are. BTW, I loves me some GB living in their heads.

VegasRick on July 25, 2010 at 12:46 PM

“The president’s getting hurt real bad,” Clyburn told me.

If you look hard enough, you can always find the Sliver Lining.

Tommy_G on July 25, 2010 at 12:47 PM

Electrongod on July 25, 2010 at 12:31 PM

TRUE DAT!!

It was plan old panic that set in at the WH. The need to “get ahead of the news cycle.”

This story was not a good moment for Breitbart. Especially, the follow-up defense about audience reaction. That was silly.

However, the entire Shirley Sherrod story did show one thing: CONSERVATIVE MEDIA IS IN THE WHITE HOUSE’S OODA Loop!! HA!! HA!! It’s got them wound up tight and flinching everywhere. YEAH!!

HDFOB on July 25, 2010 at 12:47 PM

A man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House. The Post had run an article saying that with his dry intellect, Obama would be happier on the Supreme Court than in the Oval Office. The insider nodded his head. “That’s true,” he said.
=================

True Dat,Hopey is a control freak,that would love to
persuade others on the SCOTUS,that his Social Justice
Engineering would be oh so progressive!!!!!!!!

And,after all,he did lecture Constitutional law,which
means,in his Liberal Socialist Progressive brainwashed
mindset,he would be thee most brilliant person in the
room,at any given time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 12:47 PM

Just what we need, this bho on the SC! I think it would be just dandy if this bho does not like his role as pres. he is free to resign at any time, isn’t he?
L

letget on July 25, 2010 at 12:48 PM

I feel like I am in another world with all this.

The full video shows Sherrod to clearly be a race-baiter, thus trying to promote an “us vs them” attitude based solely on race. I have a hard time understanding how THAT isn’t racist.

The NAACP in their condemnation refereed to portions of her speech which weren’t shown in the excerpt released by Breitbart, yet they are blamed for not having reviewed the full tape.

Nobody on any side seems to understand what is going on.

clement on July 25, 2010 at 12:49 PM

Ms Sherrod’s hair may not be racist, at least according to that paragon of honesty, Mr Lewis. But her mouth certainly is, judging by what has come out of it. When you view life through the prism of race, you are a racist.

azkag on July 25, 2010 at 12:49 PM

Isn’t John Lewis one of the congressmen who claimed to have been verbally abused during the Obamacare Parade in D.C.?
Since there has been no forthcoming truth to that claim is it possible he is mistaken regarding the character of the Sherrods?
Inquiring minds want to know.

gstep58 on July 25, 2010 at 12:49 PM

This isn’t surprising. What’s surprising is the media’s cover up and defense.

There is NO WAY Vilsack, a political appointee. made a decision to force a black woman to resign without getting approval from the higher ups.

Obama may, or may not, be directly involved in that aspect. But that he didn’t, personally, make a public statement of his administration’s wrong doing is indefensible. Obama has run away from this problem (like all the others) and refuses to confront it. But oh, he’ll make snarky racial comments about the “hateful discourse coming from certain elements in the country” wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

Obama could have gotten on top of this story and used the power of the press to direct the story and turn this into a real discussion of the problems of race in this country. Instead he’s turned tail and used it only for his crass political purposes.

it seems he’ll “wake the bear” for socialist purposes but not for racial healing… Bill Clinton may, indeed, have been the first black president… but if that’s the case, this makes Barack Hussein Obama the first white president.

Skywise on July 25, 2010 at 12:49 PM

If you look hard enough, you can always find the Sliver Lining.

Tommy_G on July 25, 2010 at 12:47 PM

Funny. I once had a black guy tell me I was “breaking his silver rights” by not giving him a comp meal.

VegasRick on July 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM

The teleprompter president doesn’t like venturing off-script, so when he gets surprised by some volatile, unpredictable media clusterfark, his instinct naturally is to make it go away as quickly as possible

No the real MO of the Obama admin is to blame others and call everyone racist who disagrees with him then let the media bail him out time and time again.

Its the politics of passing the buck.

William Amos on July 25, 2010 at 12:51 PM

A man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House.

He just want the taxpayer funded expense account so he can take his cool private jet for his monthly vacations.

ThePrez on July 25, 2010 at 12:51 PM

John McWhorter on CNN/Candy Crowley just had the best segment about racism and the great conversation we are “supposed” to be having.

If you can find it, allah, it was brilliant ans spot on.

MayBee on July 25, 2010 at 12:51 PM

So for once, the Obama Admin. does the right thing, only to do the wrong thing in the end.

Rae on July 25, 2010 at 12:51 PM

The Post had run an article saying that with his dry intellect, Obama would be happier on the Supreme Court than in the Oval Office. The insider nodded his head. “That’s true,” he said.

I get really tired of hearing about Obama’s intellect. I have seen zero evidence to support this claim. I think dry could be replaced with “lack of” and I guess who wouldn’t be happy with a lifetime appointment making a very good income. Well they didn’t say he would do it very well I suppose?

whbates on July 25, 2010 at 12:52 PM

his dry intellect

“Dry” as in dead wood?

ddrintn on July 25, 2010 at 12:52 PM

A man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House. The Post had run an article saying that with his dry intellect, Obama would be happier on the Supreme Court than in the Oval Office. The insider nodded his head. “That’s true,” he said.
=================

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 12:47 PM

Dry Intellect my a**… he just wants to tell people what to think. Intellect requires introspection, self-analysis and actual testing of your hypothesis… confronting failure at every turn. Y’know… WORK.

This President understands none of these things.

Skywise on July 25, 2010 at 12:53 PM

A man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House

More proof that he never wanted the job, just the title.

thomasaur on July 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM

The Post had run an article saying that with his dry intellect, Obama would be happier on the Supreme Court than in the Oval Office. The insider nodded his head. “That’s true,” he said.

OK, who doesn’t want to be on the Supreme Court? I agree he is uncomfortable at the White House, but that’s because he doesn’t have a history with actually being responsible for things. That doesn’t mean he knows the law well enough to be on SCOTUS. I don’t think he does.

He’d be happiest somewhere where he could be paid to have his thoughts, and pontificate, and get praise, and not have to be responsible for anything that results.
He’ll love being the ex-President, I think, making speeches and lots of money.

MayBee on July 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM

man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House.

He loves the trappings of power, the WH, Air Force One, going golfing whenever he wants, jetting to NY for a date night or to Maine or Florida for a quick getaway.

It’s the job that goes with the trappings that he doesn’t like. Too much work for someone who’s slid from one job to the next, always with an eye to the next job rather than to the work at hand.

Wethal on July 25, 2010 at 12:55 PM

More proof that he never wanted the job, just the title.

thomasaur on July 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM

Yeah, exactly, he just wanted to “be president”…not actually do anything like real work.

ddrintn on July 25, 2010 at 12:55 PM

Rep. John Lewis knows there’s not a racist hair on her body, and this is the same John Lewis who claims that the Tea Party made racial slurs against him in a very public setting, when there continues to be no evidence that those slurs ever happened?

I’m not sure that John Lewis would know a black racist if one came up and hugged him.

NeighborhoodCatLady on July 25, 2010 at 12:55 PM

Let’s just drop everything and spend the rest of our lives obsessing about race.

JohnBissell on July 25, 2010 at 12:56 PM

man who knows Obama well speculated a few months ago that this president isn’t in love with the White House.

Obama is a celebrity not a leader. He loves the trappings but hates all the tough decision making and being held accountible for them.

William Amos on July 25, 2010 at 12:56 PM

I seriously doubt it was Vilsack’s idea to can her immediately. That was a political/pr move. He would have handled it like any department manager and suspended pending a review.
This whole procedure reeks of move by top management like a Board of a Corporation ordering the replacement of all floor tiles in their stores because one lady slipped on a loose one someplace and the news ran with it. It’s just overreaching. Warning to CEOs everywhere, trust your managers. You hired ‘em after all.

Rocks on July 25, 2010 at 12:57 PM

Michelle Obama thesis was on racial divide

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8642.html
====================================================

Thesis
——-

Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community

Michelle Obama’s (Michelle LaVaughn Robinson’s) undergraduate thesis OCR-ed Word doc. Formatting, particularly on some of the tables, isn’t perfec…
——————————————-

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2305083/PrincetonEducated-Blacks-and-the-Black-Community

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 12:57 PM

Dry intellect? Two ghost-written autobiographical books?

Wethal on July 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM

The Post had run an article saying that with his dry intellect, Obama would be happier on the Supreme Court than in the Oval Office.

Dry intellect? How about dessicated intellect, i.e., stupid.

mockmook on July 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM

Let’s just drop everything and spend the rest of our lives obsessing about race.

JohnBissell on July 25, 2010 at 12:56 PM

Thanks anyway but I’m busy living my life.

thomasaur on July 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM

ps. I don’t think he’d actually like SCOTUS, btw, because I don’t think he’d like not being able to convince Roberts, Thomas, Scalia, and Alito that his ideas are superior.
I don’t think he likes being challenged by people with great intellect who believe the exact opposite of him.

MayBee on July 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM

John Lewis lost all authority he had on race when he called McCain a racist during the campaign. He is not worth listening to on the subject.

juliesa on July 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM

I don’t give a damn what color you are a responsible government doesn’t hang somone out to dry with out hearing the hangee’s side of the story. Screw the advisors, consultants BS–this is just another display of Cowboy Obama’s load, fire, aim method of operating.

Herb on July 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM

Hey Newsweek!
We Are All Racists Now.

mjbrooks3 on July 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM

Dry intellect? How about dessicated intellect, i.e., stupid.

mockmook on July 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM

A lake is a body of water and a dry lake lacks water, so a dry intellect would lack intelligence.

thomasaur on July 25, 2010 at 1:01 PM

Let’s just drop everything and spend the rest of our lives obsessing about race.

JohnBissell on July 25, 2010 at 12:56 PM

That is kinda racist of you to say.
/

VegasRick on July 25, 2010 at 1:02 PM

I dunno – I laughed out loud at MoDo’s take on this.
Basically she is saying this president don’t ‘speak jive’.
He needs real blacks to sharpen his slave thang.
Go for it Hopey!
Nothing would be better for America than you gettin’ your ghetto on!

As for Sherrod, she started to go lesson-in-race until she caught the anti-white farmer vibe of her audience. She then quickly backtracks to ‘well is IS about black and white.
The whole video is no more or less damning than the editted video. She is a racist. Maybe a racist in recovery… but a racist just the same.

HammerNH on July 25, 2010 at 1:02 PM

OT, but when is the Right going to push back against the meme that the tape was doctored? The attempt at redemption was clearly a part of the vid released by Breitbart. No conservative should allow the lie that the tape was doctored to go unchallenged in print, on the web or on the air. And as far as I know, only Breitbart and Coulter have pointed to the NAACP denouncing Sherrod when they were in possession of the entire vid and a roomful of NAACP folks had heard the speech in person.

xkaydet65 on July 25, 2010 at 1:03 PM

Many things have emerged from this event, but one that I find most amusing is how afraid the WH is of Glenn Beck. Even Beck was shocked. Glenn apparently has the power to bluff the Obama crew into all sorts of embarrassing political missteps. I bet Beck has the prime spot on Obama’s enemies list.

cartooner on July 25, 2010 at 1:04 PM

The WH wanted this lady to STFU immediately, if not sooner in the worst of ways. The WH needed (for reasons only they know) to get this lady under their control, guide her and school her on where to take her comments from that point forward.

Why did the WH need to get this lady under control so badly? What are they afraid of? How many more Anita Moncrief’s are out there?

Keemo on July 25, 2010 at 1:04 PM

typo – should be ‘IT is about…’

damn fat fingers.

HammerNH on July 25, 2010 at 1:04 PM

but I don’t see what having more black advisors surrounding Obama would have accomplished in handling the early uproar over the tape.

Because he’s assuming Blacks will speak out for the “own kind”. Regardless of the facts.

Just because someone is telling people they’re not a bigot, doesn’t mean they’re not a bigot.

Her words on the tape and her words to the media about Breibart and Fox News have made it pretty clear to me that Mrs. Sherrod is a bigot.

ButterflyDragon on July 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM

This President understands none of these things.

Skywise on July 25, 2010 at 12:53 PM

Skywise: Yup,he seems to have a pattern of it!!

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 1:07 PM

This laughable and a waste of good ink……Obama fired the racist.

lilium on July 25, 2010 at 1:08 PM

If she’s in recovery, she needs to start working those steps. She can start with making amends for stating Mr Brrreit-BART wants to take the country back to the days of slavery. And that Republicans are against the president because he is a black man.

azkag on July 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM

I think though that Dowd is totally wrong on the lack of blacks at the White House. Obama in this case relied on the most influential and knowledgeable black in the world for this decision, himself. After all who knows better about race than Obama? Didn’t he give the Gettysburg Address of Race Relations during the campaign about Rev. Wright?

It is Wright too that Obama was thinking about when he pulled the trigger so fast this time. He waited with Wright, despite having to know what a racist he was, and it nearly cost him. When confronted with the same problem he pulled the trigger instantly this time. Why? Not because Obama is unfamiliar with Sherrod but because he is familiar. He has heard her speak numerous times and knows her to be a racist. Sherrod wass a national figure in Black Politics prior to this. He did not know need to hear the whole tape because he already knows her entire spiel and knows it to be racist. Even if this tape totally exonerates her, it doesn’t, there must be others which condemn her. Sherrod herself went on to condemn herself in interviews after wards.

Rocks on July 25, 2010 at 1:11 PM

Barack Obama waves his sabers at China and gets those sabers rammed right down his throat and no one notices, nor cares.

Instead we are still being lectured on race relations by people who have built their entire lives, their careers exploiting race.

Skandia Recluse on July 25, 2010 at 1:12 PM

Under glare of Sherrod case, black farmers, Indian landowners still wait for settlement money
——————————————

WASHINGTON – Black farmers, due $1.2 billion for a legacy of discrimination by the U.S. Agriculture Department, suffered a new and disheartening setback this week, despite the national spotlight provided by the quickly disavowed firing of a black department worker.

The Senate refused again to pay the bill.

Opponents say it is a question of where the money would come from, and that is a a major issue with an election nearing and voters up in arms about federal spending.

Late Thursday, the Senate stripped $1.2 billion for the claims from an emergency spending bill, along with $3.4 billion in long-overdue funding for a settlement with American Indians who say they were swindled out of royalties by the federal government.

Even the attention the Shirley Sherrod case brought to the issue of discrimination at the Agriculture Department could not bring lawmakers together on a deal. Instead, Republicans and Democrats alike proclaimed their support for the funding, appeasing important constituencies, while blaming the other side for not getting anything done.
==================================================

http://www.news889.com/news/world/article/81259–under-glare-of-sherrod-case-black-farmers-indian-landowners-still-wait-for-settlement-money

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 1:13 PM

Rep. John Lewis knows there’s not a racist hair on her body, and this is the same John Lewis who claims that the Tea Party made racial slurs against him in a very public setting, when there continues to be no evidence that those slurs ever happened?

I’m not sure that John Lewis would know a black racist if one came up and hugged him.

NeighborhoodCatLady on July 25, 2010 at 12:55 PM

I always go to John Lewis when I want the truth on racial matters.

a capella on July 25, 2010 at 1:13 PM

No kidding. The more she speaks, the clearer it is that she is a huge bigot.

strictnein on July 25, 2010 at 12:41 PM

I am inclined to agree. Like most racists, she makes some exceptions for some people she gets to know personally like the Spooners, but she obviously went into her exchange with them having preconceived notions and I’m doubtful that’s changed much. It’s like the reverse of “Some of my best friends are black.”

NoLeftTurn on July 25, 2010 at 1:13 PM

So now the first black president isn’t black enough? I thouht Harry said he was just the right kind of black president. I started to read this earlier but I lost my aappetite. I don’t give much creedence to anything Maureen Dowd has to say, and it doesn’t surprise me at all that she just wants to keep the racist meme front and center, just like the rest of her ilk. To me reading her column is as appealing as listening to someone talk with a mouth full of food. And to think she gets paid handsomely for this drivel.

scalleywag on July 25, 2010 at 1:15 PM

The Post had run an article saying that with his dry intellect, Obama would be happier on the Supreme Court than in the Oval Office. The insider nodded his head. “That’s true,” he said.

Oh yeah sure, so he could vote “present” on the most intractably divisive issues facing the nation?

Goodness, if we’ve learned anything about this man over the least few years, it’s that he is happiest when he can avoid making the tough choices, and weasel out of doing anything which would subject him to any kind of direct accountability.

Serving on SCOTUS, where he’d actually have to sign his name to controversial decisions instead of fobbing the pesky details off on his party’s hacks in Congress, and where he’d be held individually responsible for the wisdom of those choices would be this man’s worst nightmare.

Besides, I’m not so sure that Justices get free air service over to Andrews to play a few holes whenevah, do they?

leilani on July 25, 2010 at 1:17 PM

You know, I am mighty tired of racial topics dominating the news cycle, especially since ObaMao has hit the scene. Generally the media have presented an unbalanced picture of events or totally ignored important factors altogether.

Rep. John Lewis had a significant role to play in the early days of securing civil rights for minorities, but his views on current events are skewed by his early experiences and, thus, are not altogether without his own prejudices. Whatever he knew about the Sherrods over the years is now ignoring some of the radical influences that they once had.

Maureen Dowd hears “dog whistles” of racism and unsaid “boy” in any conservative, Republican, or Caucasian remark or writing. She and the rest of this “progressive” Democrat crew had better get another bone to gnaw on because this one is shredded to nothingness.

onlineanalyst on July 25, 2010 at 1:19 PM

I’ve wondered why there were so quick to drop kick her to the curb. As I’ve said, even the original video that started this whole mess had enough to see there was more to the story.

My suspicion is they thought “Glenn Beck” had a lot more than he did. And while the rest of her address didn’t do any favors to the minority community either, I’m betting there is a whole butt ton more of nasty stuff about her and her associates floating around out there.

So, they fire her so fast it’s like a cannon shot. And then realize that maybe Beck/Fox/Breitbart did not have what they were afraid of. Not only that, but the allies in the media focus only the next few phrases, effectively burying the rest of that one speech and branding everyone raaaaacists!

One thing for sure, she’d be much better served to not go on CNN every couple of hours crying about how everyone else is racists and Breitbart wants her back in slavery.

JamesLee on July 25, 2010 at 1:19 PM

Vilsack jumped the gun….BHO

d1carter on July 25, 2010 at 1:19 PM

xkaydet65 on July 25, 2010 at 1:03 PM

The Republican leadership is strangely quiet on many fronts. Are they playing the game of “let them destroy themselves” while we sit in wait?

Dangerous game for sure. I’m a committee member of my local Republican county group. A question that comes up often at our meetings with the public is; what is the Republican position on ?????, pick your topic. When you stand for something, you don’t need to sit in wait or hide in a closet. A principle is a principle, and you either believe in the principle or you’re a phony. Republicans are allowing millions of citizens to figure out (guess) their motive rather than getting out in front of the people and clearly stating their position on all of the key issues. Some dribble here and there, mostly at the local level, is not working.

People want so badly for one of the two parties to stand for something they can relate to. The Liberals have shown the entire country what they stand for with their actions. This leaves the Republican party as the only chance these people have to relate and identify; the only chance for hope in government. As a Conservative, I’m blown away by the Republican leadership, and have lost much of my confidence that these people will do any better running the country. What does being a Republican stand for these days? It’s up to the Republican leadership to stand up and tell the country these lil details while the attention is highly focused.

Smaller government?
Lower taxes?
Strict enforcement of our Constitution?
Laws for everyone, not just the citizens?
Capitalism and free markets?
Protection of our homeland?

Are our guys going to wait for the 6-week mark before letting the country know this information once again. I mean, talk about letting a golden opportunity go by.

Keemo on July 25, 2010 at 1:20 PM

I dunno. Her later comments sounded pretty darned bigoted.

irishspy on July 25, 2010 at 12:37 PM

Yeah, ditto that.

Even in the video tape in question, she basically admitted to having had racial motives in not wanting to fully help a white farmer…before her “epiphany”.

All this racial talk is really getting ridiculous anyway. Race does not, and should not, matter…especially in the halls of power in DC. The more it’s talked about, the more divisive the nation becomes. It should have absolutely no bearing on anything.

JetBoy on July 25, 2010 at 1:21 PM

Forget the racist or not racist aspect of this story about Ms. Sherrod.The fact has been lost that this woman is a Government employee, and as such should not be giving speeches to the NAACP charging Republicans, tea party members and anyone who was against the health care bill as being racists. As a public employee she is charged to be working for ,we the people, not the NAACP, Democrat party etc, but all of us.

sandee on July 25, 2010 at 1:26 PM

JetBoy – race matters if you are utilizing it in making decisions for a government agency or business. I agree, race talk is getting really ridiculous.

I submit that Sherrod knew the President was involved since she had worked for the Government for over 20 years and knew procedures.

SamHenry on July 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM

The WH wanted this lady to STFU immediately, if not sooner in the worst of ways. The WH needed (for reasons only they know) to get this lady under their control, guide her and school her on where to take her comments from that point forward.

Why did the WH need to get this lady under control so badly? What are they afraid of? How many more Anita Moncrief’s are out there?

Keemo on July 25, 2010 at 1:04 PM

This I think is the point. Obama and crew have leaped to the defence of far worse people than Sherrod and it makes me wonder what made them so gun shy this time. Maybe it was short term damage control, or maybe there is a lot more here than we yet know.

sharrukin on July 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM

WH had a role? I thought it was the USDA Chief, Mr. Vilsack? Surely only he could’ve acted stupidly.

ted c on July 25, 2010 at 1:28 PM

You might be a racist if….

faraway on July 25, 2010 at 1:28 PM

The real question is did the White House have a role in painting the Tea Party racists…?

d1carter on July 25, 2010 at 1:28 PM

The most divisive nation we’ve ever been has manifested itself after a black man was elected president. How ironic. And where is it all coming from? This administration and it’s main stream media. Disgusting.

scalleywag on July 25, 2010 at 1:29 PM

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2010/07/026848.php

In this article, the issues are listed in importance to the American people. As I go through the list, I know exactly where I stand. What bothers me so, is I don’t really know for sure where my party stands. I think I know, but I sure would like to see my leaders get pro-active with their message now rather than letting me wonder.

I have no choice in my voting pattern, don’t get me wrong. I could never bring myself to vote for the Liberal. I simply wish Republicans would get their collective butts out in front of every available microphone and camera, shout from every roof top, let us know exactly where they stand on each issue and mean it.

Keemo on July 25, 2010 at 1:30 PM

And another thing. What is this about “prominent” blacks trying to warn the White House that Ms.Sherrod was not racist? Who is one of the first to throw her under the bus? The NAACP. They had the “whole” tape and denounced her anyway? Something is mighty fishy here.

sandee on July 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM

I don’t see what having more black advisors surrounding Obama would have accomplished in handling the early uproar over the tape.

Me neither. She also feels no need to explain why the all-black leadership at the NAACP demonstrated the same racial insensitivity as the overprotective white guys. Could the NAACP be outsourcing?

Infidoll on July 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM

What are the chances Shirley was merely pandering to a like-minded audience to generate laughs and sympathy, and that she really isn’t racially motivated?

I wonder…

TinMan13 on July 25, 2010 at 1:34 PM

What are the chances Shirley was merely pandering to a like-minded audience to generate laughs and sympathy, and that she really isn’t racially motivated?

I wonder…

TinMan13 on July 25, 2010 at 1:34 PM

Like-minded in what regard?

Laughing at someone discriminating on the basis of race? Maybe she should head over to the local Klan meeting, because I hear they too are somewhat ‘like-minded’ that way.

sharrukin on July 25, 2010 at 1:37 PM

What are the chances Shirley was merely pandering to a like-minded audience to generate laughs and sympathy, and that she really isn’t racially motivated?

I wonder…

TinMan13 on July 25, 2010 at 1:34 PM

I don’t. Have you heard her comments afterward?

VegasRick on July 25, 2010 at 1:37 PM

TinMan13 on July 25, 2010 at 1:34 PM

She has destroyed that theory with her comments over the past 3-4 days. She actually accused Breitbart of wanting to force blacks back to the era of slavery. This after admitting that she didn’t know who Breitbart was until last week.

Keemo on July 25, 2010 at 1:38 PM

That’s good news. Not only does he hate this Country…he hates his job too!

repvoter on July 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM

We must be getting close to this being the longest span at a single job in his entire career.

cthulhu on July 25, 2010 at 1:39 PM

Shirley Sherrod Tells CNN She Received 3 Phone Calls Saying White House Wanted Her to Resign
——————————-

Shirley Sherrod tells Tony Harris on CNN that she was contacted three times by telephone saying the White House wanted her to resign.
=============================

http://blackpoliticalthought.blogspot.com/2010/07/shirley-sherrod-tells-cnn-white-house.html

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 1:39 PM

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 1:39 PM

It was probably BO the dog or one of the girls that called. Such pranksters! It was NOT obambi that made that call!

VegasRick on July 25, 2010 at 1:41 PM

Yeah but Tinman – the pandering is by itself racism.
At least it has been.
Think Trent Lott at the Strom Thurmond birthday party.

HammerNH on July 25, 2010 at 1:42 PM

“The president’s getting hurt real bad,” Clyburn told me. “He needs some black people around him.” He said Obama’s inner circle keeps “screwing up” on race.

…uh…

The Tea Party is TEH RACIST!@!!!11

Good Lt on July 25, 2010 at 1:43 PM

She actually accused Breitbart of wanting to force blacks back to the era of slavery. This after admitting that she didn’t know who Breitbart was until last week.

Keemo on July 25, 2010 at 1:38 PM

Keemo: Here ya go,jus try’n to help———:)
=========================================================

Sherrod: Breitbart wants to take us back to the days of slavery

posted at 5:17 pm on July 23, 2010 by Allahpundit

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/23/sherrod-breitbart-wants-to-take-us-back-to-the-days-of-slavery/

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 1:44 PM

DNC spokesmen such as David Ignatius never tire of fellating Obama with tales of his “dry intellect,” without the benefit of actual evidence of anything greater than a mediocre intellect.

BCrago66 on July 25, 2010 at 1:44 PM

JetBoy – race matters if you are utilizing it in making decisions for a government agency or business. I agree, race talk is getting really ridiculous.

I submit that Sherrod knew the President was involved since she had worked for the Government for over 20 years and knew procedures.

SamHenry on July 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM

It’s just statement like Obama should be surrounding himself with more black people that just tick me off. Statements like that are racist. Obama should be surrounding himself with, as far as a Dem can be, the best people regardless totally of race for their respective positions.

No one…citizen or in government…should have race matter at all. No special benefits based on race, and no detrimental police based on race. It should be a non issue for everything, save a person’s family tree. Period.

JetBoy on July 25, 2010 at 1:44 PM

*not “police”…policy…ugh

JetBoy on July 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM

I think it’s funny that Beck–who had NOTHING to do with this incident except as some perceived threat–continues to be considered a central figure in this WH clusterf*ck. Just as Dems were getting some traction on blaming Breithbart for jumping the gun on a videoclip, clowns like Howard Dean are blaming the mere prospect of coverage by Glenn Beck as the real crime. And for all we know, Beck’s name was the first name she pulled out of her conversation with higher ups. For all we know, they could have said Hannity, BOR, Greta, or Fox & Friends.

Whatever the case, and whether it’s true or not, the impression is now out there that Beck and his red phone are so far in their heads that they’re having nightmares about him. And maybe they should be fearful. Fox News is increasingly attracting more viewers looking for the straight poop, and I have to believe that many of those are independents. Also, as far as the commentary programs go, my money is that Beck’s show (maybe Greta’s) is the most appealing for independents. Yet daily, Beck hammers Obama and his administration with that phone and chalk board.

I’ll bet Beck’s rating are about to increase significantly.

BuckeyeSam on July 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM

She also feels no need to explain why the all-black leadership at the NAACP demonstrated the same racial insensitivity as the overprotective white guys. Could the NAACP be outsourcing?

Infidoll on July 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM

The NAACP acted the way it did for the same reason Obama did. They KNOW her to be a racist. Why review a tape to prove what you already know?

Rocks on July 25, 2010 at 1:47 PM

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 1:39 PM
=============================
It was probably BO the dog or one of the girls that called. Such pranksters! It was NOT obambi that made that call!

VegasRick on July 25, 2010 at 1:41 PM

VegasRick: D*mmit,Hopey has to take the vell phone away
from BO,when the dog travels seperately!!

Hey,maybe its the work of vengeful HilRod,and
her Vast Extreme RightWing Conspiracy Cabal!!
haha.

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 1:47 PM

Crap,thats cell,not vell!Ugh.

canopfor on July 25, 2010 at 1:48 PM

Ah yes, Barry is eminently qualified for SCOTUS. And here’s just a little of the bio of one of those “dumb, blond bimbos”, Jamie Colby on the “ridiculous” FOX NEWS. Who’s more qualified?

Aside from her journalism career, Colby is an attorney and served in private practice for 10 years. She is an attorney admitted to practice in New York, California, the District of Columbia and Florida. Colby is also a former law professor, a member of Law Review and has been a National Board member of American Women in Radio and Television for the last several years. Attending the University of Miami International School of Business at age 14, she received a Bachelor of Business Administration in accounting as well as her Juris Doctor degree from the University of Miami School of Law at age 22.

Jeff on July 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM

Obama’s intellect is dry alright, like a well. Nothing there.

Rocks on July 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM

I once had a black guy tell me I was “breaking his silver rights” by not giving him a comp meal.

VegasRick on July 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM

You clearly were violating his silver rights. He had a Constitutional right to a comp meal, a comp room, and a stack of $1000 chips.

The silver rights are listed in the “good and welfare” clause of the Constitution. I forget which section the golden rights are in. Maybe they just emanate from some penumbra(s), like the “Constitutional right” to abortion.

AZCoyote on July 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM

Maureen Dowd hints: The White House had a role in pushing Sherrod out

Well DUH!!!

Welcome to what the rest of the world already knows MoDo!!

RealMc on July 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM

Comment pages: 1 2