NAACP and Glenn Beck agree: People rushed to judgment on Sherrod
posted at 7:55 pm on July 20, 2010 by Allahpundit
Apparently Krauthammer agrees too. I haven’t seen it yet, but according to one of Ace’s co-bloggers, CK said on “Special Report” a few minutes ago that Sherrod deserves an apology and her job back. The NAACP’s statement:
With regard to the initial media coverage of the resignation of USDA Official Shirley Sherrod, we have come to the conclusion we were snookered by Fox News and Tea Party Activist Andrew Breitbart into believing she had harmed white farmers because of racial bias.
Having reviewed the full tape, spoken to Ms. Sherrod, and most importantly heard the testimony of the white farmers mentioned in this story, we now believe the organization that edited the documents did so with the intention of deceiving millions of Americans.
The fact is Ms. Sherrod did help the white farmers mentioned in her speech. They personally credit her with helping to save their family farm.
Moreover, this incident and the lesson it prompted occurred more that 20 years before she went to work for USDA…
Next time we are confronted by a racial controversy broken by Fox News or their allies in the Tea Party like Mr. Breitbart, we will consider the source and be more deliberate in responding. The tape of Ms. Sherrod’s speech at an NAACP banquet was deliberately edited to create a false impression of racial bias, and to create a controversy where none existed. This just shows the lengths to which extremist elements will go to discredit legitimate opposition.
They should release the tape to erase lingering doubt about the context, but as noted in my previous post, it’s true that the Spooners have been adamant that Sherrod worked tirelessly on their behalf. As for the reaction of some in the audience, which the NAACP itself described as “disturbing” in its initial statement yesterday, I’m not sure what the group’s current position on it is. Presumably that’s been washed away too in the point about wider context presciently made yesterday by the Anchoress. Here’s what she offers today:
You know what’s not singing to me, now? The argument that “the tape wasn’t about nailing Sherrod, it was about demonstrating the racism of the NAACP audience; it was a response to their wicked attempt to paint the Tea Party as racist.”
As I said yesterday, there was certainly a stones/glass houses note to it all, but Shirley Sherrod had a story to tell, and as far as I’m concerned, that story needed telling in full – that was the only way to be fair to Sherrod. After it was told, then, if you wanted to make the point about the audience’s reaction to her own tale–which is apparently one that indicts her own racist past–you could do that. Otherwise, all you’ve done is destroyed Sherrod in the same way that Trent Lott was ruined: by taking her remarks out of context.
Context matters.
“Context matters”: As you’ll see, Beck makes the same point verbatim. He was actually named by Sherrod today as someone whose reaction to the tape the White House was worried about, but instead of attacking them for hiring an alleged racist, he throws them a curveball by attacking them for firing an innocent woman before the full context of what she said could be determined. He also knocks the NAACP, quite correctly, for using Sherrod as a pawn in its war with the tea party: The only reason they moved to denounce her so quickly, of course, was to prove their own alleged saintliness on racial issues so that they could continue to lecture tea partiers on their sins. In fact, the only people who emerge basically unscathed here is conservative media like us, even though we made the same judgment about the tape. Maybe that came later in the show, which was after all devoted to this topic; I didn’t see it so I don’t have the full context, and like the man says, context matters.
Update: One of our dumber left-wing commenters misunderstood my point in the last paragraph so let me spell it out further. When I say that conservative media emerged unscathed, I mean in Beck’s segment; he let us off easy even though we made snap judgments about the clip too.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Yeah, try not to give speeches that could potentially get taken out of context because it’ll get you fired.
Proud Rino on July 20, 2010 at 9:01 PM
People who think everything should be equal don’t consider themselves Marxist, they don’t even know what it means for the most part. There is never equality in any form of government but ours at least tries to give equal opportunity. The rest is up to the individual. But not for long.
Cindy Munford on July 20, 2010 at 9:02 PM
The well edited photo/video of a “Gun totting Tea Party Racist” was in fact a BLACK man, and was being TOTALY USED OUT OF CONTEXT.
The well edited video of a “White Supremacist attending a Tea Party Rally” who was in fact clearly being literally hounded out of the rally by the Tea Party Members, was also being TOTALY USED OUT OF CONTEXT.
Shirley Sherrod nailed it herself. To her credit, she is blaming the NAACP for their politically driven, deliberately dishonest, cynical and baseless attacks on the Tea Party.
Andrew Breitbart, illustrating absurdity with absurdity, is a genius.
Pole-Cat on July 20, 2010 at 9:03 PM
No, you screeching imbecile. I’m not saying that conservative media emerged unscathed in reality; I’m saying that it emerged unscathed in Beck’s segment. He basically gave conservative media a pass even though we’re culpable too. You truly are a moron among morons.
And Breitbart is mentioned twice in the post. I specifically quoted the parts of the NAACP statement criticizing him.
Allahpundit on July 20, 2010 at 9:03 PM
Yep that’s what I take away from this – They thought they would smear the Tea Party with the racist charge free and clear – no consequences, and low and behold they became the story.
Dr Evil on July 20, 2010 at 9:04 PM
Don’t brag about your racism because it’ll get you fired, especially if there’s some fishy conflict-of-interest stuff in your hiring background that could make your cowardly bosses look bad.
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:04 PM
AllahP! You’ve… you’ve gone alpha!
[swoons]
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:05 PM
This lady played and got hurt so don’t worry about. You are funny
CWforFreedom on July 20, 2010 at 9:05 PM
Seriously, AP, thanks for giving Tom_Shipley the set-down he so richly deserves. I kinda hope you don’t ban him, though, as he’s fun to bat around. ;-)
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:06 PM
Yeah, but YOU have not criticized him. Ed defended him, even today. I have not seen one writing on here criticize him, even though he’s clearly either insane, idiotic or utterly dishonest.
And yes, I see now you were saying you were unscathed in the Beck segment. Sorry for that.
Tom_Shipley on July 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM
That’s actually not true. Mine is.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM
yeah baby!
cmsinaz on July 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM
Dang.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:09 PM
Project much, Tom?
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:09 PM
The woman is a racist. Listen to the words on the clip, in or out of context: “I didn’t give him the full force of what I could do”, “I figured…his own kind would take care of him”, “I took him to one of his own”.
And she struggled because so many blacks had lost their farms and he was white.
Reverse the race of the woman and the farmer, and you would have racism shouted from the rooftops 24×7 for days on mslsd and cnn.
notagool on July 20, 2010 at 9:09 PM
Dr Evil on July 20, 2010 at 9:09 PM
Uhhh, I’m not sure now we should take that.
exception on July 20, 2010 at 9:11 PM
even if it happened back in ’86..
cmsinaz on July 20, 2010 at 9:11 PM
Over at AoSHQ, we’re all morons and moronettes! :-)
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:13 PM
Correctamundo!
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:14 PM
There’s no better way to get under the skin of a blogger/journalist/etc… then accusing them of being in bed with someone they are “covering.” Perhaps that was a little harsh, but I find the lack of criticism of Breitbart by the bloggers on this site striking.
Tom_Shipley on July 20, 2010 at 9:14 PM
Only if you work for awful people.
exception on July 20, 2010 at 9:16 PM
That’s because (1) you’re an idiot and (2) I, for one, agree 100% percent with everything Breitbart has done. He did nothing wrong. He showed a video that was given to him, a video that was newsworthy and true. He did not tamper with it or slant it. It shows what it shows: a bunch of people condoning with and agreeing with a racist action taken by a U.S. government official.
Breitbart did exactly what an honest journalist should do. If you have a problem with that, you really are a “screeching imbecile” as our host has termed you.
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:17 PM
She admits to having been racist, in part because her father was murdered by whites who were never punished. But she then also goes on to admit that, that particular experience changed her and that she eventually did help the man, more than his white lawyer who was apparently worthless.
She did something racist, but the speech doesn’t at all prove she is racist.
In fact, towards the end, she mentions being upset that the room, for a NAACP event, isn’t also filled with whites.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:21 PM
Have the apparatchiks changed the narrative to discredit Breitbart yet?
How embarrassing for them.
Inanemergencydial on July 20, 2010 at 9:22 PM
Maybe you should wander over to the thread posted about this last night by Allah, realize that he had concerns and then go forth and multiply.
Cindy Munford on July 20, 2010 at 9:23 PM
Wow! I am impressed.
How did the audience react to her later remarks?
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:23 PM
In fact, towards the end, she mentions being upset that the room, for a NAACP event, isn’t also filled with whites.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:21 PM
Did she chastise the audience for their reaction? Oh and please quit with that point that she wished more whites were there. Laughable. Oh and tool you continue to whitewash the REACTION of the CROWD.
CWforFreedom on July 20, 2010 at 9:24 PM
I’m sure that’s true, especially considering Breitbart himself wrote on twitter that AP had insulted him.
It’s beyond harsh. It’s just misguided and a little ignorant of facts. It makes you look like a partisan rather than someone with an objective understanding of the facts.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:26 PM
I didn’t watch the breitbarted tape, but The Anchoress’s post on it makes it seem like it was clear that there was essential context missing. Either Breitbart is an idiot, which is hard to believe, or he did a really ****** thing to a perfectly underserving target to score a cheap political point. Hopefully someone on the right gives him the rhetorical coal-raking he earned on this.
RightOFLeft on July 20, 2010 at 9:27 PM
How did the crowd react to her later remarks? (no TV here…)
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:27 PM
It’s obvious that your rectal/craniotomy was not a success.
thomasaur on July 20, 2010 at 9:28 PM
But, really, he didn’t do anything wrong! He didn’t tamper with the video. He didn’t fire Ms Sherrod – that was her craven bosses’ knee-jerk reaction. If he hadn’t aired the video he had, the NAACP would never have released the full version, and we’d all be just as much in the dark as before.
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:29 PM
What he looks like, he is! :-)
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:30 PM
No, you screeching imbecile.
Allahpundit on July 20, 2010 at 9:03 PM
Allahpundit: Screechy,me like!!:)
canopfor on July 20, 2010 at 9:33 PM
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:26 PM
Go look at all the posts on this tape from today — there’s not one word of criticism of Breitbart in any of them, even though he instigated this. He put this obviously out-of-context tape out there. And not only that, he proclaimed it proof that the NAACP is racist. And stood by that assessment today even after the context of the tape was revealed.
I was just being a dick with the “in bed” comment, but it’s really odd there’s not been one word of criticism directed toward Breitbart by the bloggers here.
Tom_Shipley on July 20, 2010 at 9:33 PM
Agreement for the most part with some obvious gasps and other horror noises when she mentioned that the farmer was about to lose his farm before he called and brought her back in to help.
With all the context, especially the early part about her father, I’m thinking even the audience wasn’t reacting to what we thought they were.
You’ve already made up your mind, so don’t bother arguing with me. I’m not interested tonight.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:34 PM
That’s ’cause you’re on the wrong thread, bucko. Go to the newer one, with the full video.
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:38 PM
Mary in LA on July 20, 2010 at 9:38 PM
There is no criticism of Breitbart in Allah’s post in that thread.
Tom_Shipley on July 20, 2010 at 9:40 PM
I believe that.
And there’s no proof that Breitbart did anything wrong. It’s just as likely he was fooled on this woman as well. Do you actually have something to criticize him on? Some sort of proof that he had the full tape but doctored it?
Because the man’s history says otherwise. It’s not as though he could have believed no one would ever find out.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:41 PM
Dear Democrats,
How’s your own medicine taste?
Yours,
Conservatives
fossten on July 20, 2010 at 9:43 PM
Below is what AP wrote at his first posting about this incident last night.
And who put out the full tape? Andrew Breitbart.
Cindy Munford on July 20, 2010 at 9:45 PM
.
FTFY.
Tom_Shipley on July 20, 2010 at 9:47 PM
Why didn’t the release it or even watch it before commenting. Then they wouldn’t have gotten snookered.
Cindy Munford on July 20, 2010 at 9:50 PM
Beck outmaneuvered all of us on this one. We all should take note of this tonight. There is something very big and uncertain happening in our country right now.
ted c on July 20, 2010 at 9:51 PM
You’ve already made up your mind, so don’t bother arguing with me. I’m not interested tonight.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 9:34 PM
Hmmm pot meet kettle. In the end the reality is that the NAACP crowd was exposed as racist yet you rant on. You are an idiot. Keep it up …..the trolls will think you are fair as they laugh behind your used assssssss.
CWforFreedom on July 20, 2010 at 9:53 PM
They prejudged her.
CWforFreedom on July 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM
When Breitbart does it, it’s reprehensible. When the MSM do it (the Palin “scandal” du jour, “macaca”, the McCain “illicit affair”) it’s just “real journalists” at work.
ddrintn on July 20, 2010 at 9:56 PM
REAL racism exists on both sides of the aisle.
Now let’s refocus on the DOTUS that is trying to pit us all as different grievance groups that all need protectors from each other…………AND MUST OF COURSE BE PROTECTED by a strong Federal government that “fairly” picks the winners and losers.
This 15 minute Sherrod story will be yesterdays outrage in 5……4……3…..
PappyD61 on July 20, 2010 at 9:56 PM
Pot meet kettle? Have you seen my name before? Did you see it before the full video was released? Seriously, f- off. You’re a total tool.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 10:00 PM
That works for me.
Gang-of-One on July 20, 2010 at 10:00 PM
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
Context matters.
TN Mom on July 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM
she had a “macaca” moment…………..
How long did the left shout racist with bullhorns over a word that really has no meaning…….
If they reverse that election and apologize for the slander and personal destruction………then this can be reversed
sbark on July 20, 2010 at 10:01 PM
It’s really odd that you aren’t similarly torn up about slanders directed toward tea partiers by the lib media you apparently adore. It’s all about whose ox is being gored, eh?
ddrintn on July 20, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Sure, to the MSM, but there’s no proof he did anything but post a video someone gave him.
Esthier on July 20, 2010 at 10:03 PM
Absolutely, which good ol’ Tom would excuse completely if the target had been some eeeeevillllle conservative.
ddrintn on July 20, 2010 at 10:04 PM
Flesh tone is a color, it nearly matches my skin tone and you can find it in a box of Crayolas™
Inanemergencydial on July 20, 2010 at 10:05 PM
Breitbart besmirched himself with this one. it’s a shame since he is usually right. If he actually had the whole tape all along, I don’t understand why just using that segment wouldn’t backfire on him. In the meantime, fellow nonliberals, promote the Anchoress’ post heavily to make it known that some conservatives don’t rush to judgment.
The silver lining: A few more self-reflective liberals/media pundits will see themselves in this rush to judgment and stop doing the same to the teaparty.
YehuditTX on July 20, 2010 at 10:17 PM
If the NAACP had the entire tape, why on earth didn’t they review it before condemning this woman? That doesn’t make sense, unless they are fully aware that racism is alive and well within their ranks, and just assumed this was a case of it. Also, concerning Obama, he was quick to defend Professor Gates without benefit of the entire story, why not give this woman the same benefit of the doubt, at least waiting until more of the tape could be reviewed?
I think this woman’s message was one of redemption, trying to voice that while she may have had racist motives to deny to a white man the full extent of her knowledge and expertise, she realized that the poverty shared by this family with others, whatever the color of their skin, should transcend race and bring folks together in the common cause of fighting poverty wherever it exists. That’s a powerful message if communicated well.
oldoldbabs on July 20, 2010 at 10:22 PM
Man, Allah, when you throw down, you THROW DOWN. You give no quarter! Good for you.
Gang-of-One on July 20, 2010 at 10:31 PM
But is it their message? Just last week this organization labeled the Tea Party as racist. I have to assume it was to frighten people from becoming involved. Large numbers of people voicing opposition to Mr. Obama’s run towards socialism must be stopped.
Cindy Munford on July 20, 2010 at 10:38 PM
He had to know the video was incomplete. Racism is too serious a charge to throw around without due diligence. The NAACP acted stupidly, but I think Breitbart acted recklessly to the point of malice. He wanted something to hurt the NAACP and he seized on the first scrap he could find without regard to who else he might hurt.
Within a day of the video being released, the MSM has tracked down the white farmer, the unedited video, and actually interviewed Sherrod to directly ask for her side. What did Andy B. do? In comparison to the so-called drive-by media, Breitbart is setting off roadside bombs. It’s irresponsible journalism, and it was only a matter of time before it backfired — a fact he should have easily forseen.
RightOFLeft on July 20, 2010 at 10:44 PM
I do.
I couldn’t give less of a damn what you think. You’re a hypocritical little Obamabot, criticizing your projected mirror image, dropping talking points like your pockets are full of them while excoriating others for your perception that they’re doing the same. You’re a dishonest little turd, expressing outrage only when you perceive a crime happening against your side, but dead silent when it happens across the aisle, despite your limp-wristed insistence than you’re objective. F**k off, quisling.
MadisonConservative on July 20, 2010 at 10:50 PM
Whether Andrew Brietbart’s behavior was proper in all this does not change my opinion of Shirley Sherrod. She is still a racist scumbag, and I don’t think she ever deserved a job at the USDA. Some may be willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, but I still say we should judge by the standards by which liberals judge us. If Racism knows no color, then I don’t think either side of the aisle should monopolize harsh judgement, either.
gryphon202 on July 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM
Ouch!
Cindy Munford on July 20, 2010 at 10:58 PM
having now watched the full video I can see that people made a rush judgment regarding her but the NAACP is a different matter. The people in that crowd that made audible agreements with her statements about whites and not helping them is disturbing. The video is no vindication for the NAACP. They definitely agreed with those statements.
theguardianii on July 20, 2010 at 11:01 PM
Glennius Beckius Magnus. He is the man. He so outsmarted the WH and their racists pawns today. It was awesome.
Mirimichi on July 20, 2010 at 11:02 PM
Mary Frances Berry admitted this at the Politico:
Proud Rino:
You sick phuck . You won’t stand up to this?
CWforFreedom on July 20, 2010 at 11:03 PM
Conservative journalists and bloggers are so honorable, so conscientious, why can’t the liberal media be like that ?
Now , this woman should have been fired 20 years ago, it just came a few decades late. It’s very kumbaya that over time she learned to deal with her racist demons, but how many people suffered because of her racism over the years we will never know.
runner on July 20, 2010 at 11:14 PM
lmakes you wanna cry, don’t it
runner on July 20, 2010 at 11:17 PM
Cindy Munford on July 20, 2010 at 10:38 PM
Cindy, I did not mean to ascribe that message to the NAACP, just to Mrs. Sherrod and what she was saying in this speech. To me the NAACP has become just another pernicious arm of the Democratic Party, and the cries of racism leveled against the Tea Party just another example of the concentrated effort to discredit them, and to also change the message. It has worked before, too many times, and to me it’s the only tranparency I see coming from this administration. Divide and conquer, black against white, rich against not-so-rich, young against old, on and on. They are truly evil, and they use those they purport to help in such vile ways, I just cannot fathom why so many people fall for this strategy that is dividing this nation as never before.
oldoldbabs on July 20, 2010 at 11:24 PM
It’s a stressful time. I shudder to think what he will do if he loses Congress. Of all the things wrong with this man and his ideology and his blatant anti-Americanism, all the Left come up with is racism.
Cindy Munford on July 20, 2010 at 11:38 PM
Breitbart was saying yesterday that he wanted access to the full video. The difference between the conservative media and the old media is that conservatives actually dig for facts, and report those facts.
Did Fox and Brietbart force the NAACP to make a statement on Sherrod? Are they and the White House that afraid?
hawksruleva on July 20, 2010 at 11:47 PM
You made me spit up my drink. That whole post is hilarious! Breitbart DID know the video was incomplete, and hoped to see the entire video. But see, the NAACP had the full video, and wouldn’t share. Maybe they thought it was incriminating.
The funniest part, though – “racism is too serious a charge to throw around with due diligence”. Breitbart had a fairly long video clip. The Tea Party is being flogged for racism with carefully edited, 15 to 20-second clips. A man holding a gun (who turns out to be black). A man making racist statements (being driven out by Tea Partiers). A Senator being called names and spit upon (no video for this at ALL).
If racism is so serious, why is anyone who wants to cut a budget suddenly being accused of it? Why are black Tea Party members being painted with that broad racism accusation? Why are hispanic police in Arizona suffering charges of racism?
hawksruleva on July 20, 2010 at 11:55 PM
http://www.breitbart.tv/flashback-naacp-crowd-cheers-jeremiah-wright-mocking-white-people/
Yep no NAACP racism .none I tell ya. sarc
CWforFreedom on July 20, 2010 at 11:59 PM
The NAACP, I’m convinced, is staffed by idiots. Why release a statement attacking Fox News and the Tea Party when ONE person was to blame (Breitbart, it seems)? They look small and petty with such comments, and it doesn’t help their case that Glenn Beck (cough cough on Fox News) is out there defending Sherrod!
What was Fox News supposed to do when someone came to them with a tape like this- refuse to cover the story?
Their statements constantly prove them to be the petty and juvenile. No shocker there.
TheBlueSite on July 21, 2010 at 12:37 AM
Worse- they don’t seem to attack Vilsack, whhose office apparently dismissed her for the comments. If Vilsack was “snookered,” isn’t it fair to say Fox News was as well? If a white woman had seemingly made such comments against a black farmer, they’d tag Fox News racist scumbags for NOT covering the story.
Like I said- the folks at the NAACP seem petty and childish.
TheBlueSite on July 21, 2010 at 12:41 AM
Maybe not, but plenty of commenters were and are critical of Breitbart’s actions. If you were looking for conservative criticism from the blogosphere, that thread has a ton of it. If you were specifically limiting it to our host bloggers, well, it’s not your business to tell them what to write. Get your own blog.
I don’t know why I bothered to reply to you, frankly. Our host nailed you dead to rights when he called you a “screeching imbecile” and a “moron”. And if the gentle and affable AllahPundit, who puts up with truly amazing amounts of cr@p from some of the most obnoxious trolls in the blogosphere, has started yelling at you, that should be a huge clue that you should clean up your act, or go troll somewhere else.
Mary in LA on July 21, 2010 at 1:32 AM
My gosh, BlueSite, I agree with you!
(checks the sky for the 24th Porcine Attack Squadron on maneuvers)
:-)
Mary in LA on July 21, 2010 at 1:35 AM
“Flesh tone”? That’s racist. It privileges Euro-American skin color. Report to the nearest re-education camp immediately — and take your racist Crayolas™ and your racist coloring paper (it is white, after all) with you.
/do I hafta?
Mary in LA on July 21, 2010 at 1:41 AM
I don’t care who you are that’s funny right there.
Gang-of-One on July 21, 2010 at 2:20 AM
Yes – Dipley wouldn’t get it otherwise.
Actually, he still won’t! :)
Bizarro No. 1 on July 21, 2010 at 2:52 AM
I don’t really see why it matters that Sherrod eventually helped the white farmer out. The type of language she was using, even to tell a story about something that happened 20-30 years ago, is something anyone else would be lambasted for. “Their own kind” and all of this type of talk.
So basically, no, she did not misuse her power at USDA, and no, she didn’t admit to doing anything racist recently – but she did admit to acting and thinking in a racist manner in the past, and described that story in what is typically seen as unacceptable language.
I think the larger story that is now being glossed over is the one that the Washington Examiner dug up: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Shirley-Sherrods-Disappearing-Act-Not-So-Fast-98846149.html
As Mr. Blumer writes, there is most likely an entirely different reason Vilsack and the White House wanted Sherrod out of the spotlight ASAP, and it has nothing to do with the NAACP video.
Seixon on July 21, 2010 at 3:43 AM
don’t hold your breath…
cmsinaz on July 21, 2010 at 6:32 AM
I believe they changed that color designation to “peach” or something like it several years ago. Thank you, PC police.
Extrafishy on July 21, 2010 at 7:26 AM
People like you make me sick. 95% of journalists are nothing more than left wing propagandist hacks who slant, skew and make up crap on a daily basis. They have no consideration of the effect their lies have on people … only that they must destroy anyone who may stand in the way of their demonic progressivism.
You NEVER come out and condemn ANY left wing smear job or propaganda, no matter how destructive or false it is.
Get bent, you and your comrades are diseased.
darwin on July 21, 2010 at 7:30 AM
Where there’s smoke there’s fire. There must be some reason the USDA doesn’t want this woman investigated. Perhaps her actions don’t match up with her words. We know how pretty these political hacks can sound and now that she’s been cornered they twist and turn until they come out smelling like roses. Look at Robert Byrd! I’m sure if she had been white and a republican the NAACP and liberal media would be so willing to forgive her….right?
mozalf on July 21, 2010 at 7:37 AM
Dittos that. Maybe Rush or Glenn will pick up on it. I can understand the NAACP being trigger happy under Breitbart’s attack, but I haven’t heard any good explanation of why the WH jumped the gun so hard. Makes me suspect there’s a skeleton in the closet.
petefrt on July 21, 2010 at 8:02 AM
FNC is reporting that USDA knew her background and knew Sherrod’s full story, including the redemption part, yet they told her to resign anyway.
We still don’t know who’s lying. Did the WH force her out, as she said three different times, or did Vilsack do it, as he now claims.
Also, NAACP says it was”snookered” by Fox News, but NAACP had the full tape all along, according to Breitbart, and Sherrod had resigned before Fox ever mentioned the story.
There’s a lot that still doesn’t add up in this story.
petefrt on July 21, 2010 at 8:13 AM
I have never heard a person of color say the word “snookered”. Who do they have writing their press releases?
Laserjock on July 21, 2010 at 9:11 AM
LOL, no they won’t.
Midas on July 21, 2010 at 10:01 AM
Wouldn’t it be great if journalists did that with ALL their stories, no matter the source? Maybe one day they will look at the tapes collected by Breitbart and see that the Congressmen who cried “Racism” may have been mis-remembering the event. (I wasn’t sure if I should go with hallucinating or just plain lying.)
barnone on July 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM
Breitbart and conservative media got snookered. He should have held back the tape until he had the whole thing. Then the story would be the racist reaction of the audience, not Sherrod’s comments.
skydaddy on July 21, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »