The media’s got a fee-vah and the only prescription is more “refudiate”
posted at 6:42 pm on July 19, 2010 by Allahpundit
It’s a testament to how, er, wee-wee’d up they are over this that 99 percent of you will know what I’m talking about from the headline alone. If you’re among the other one percent, read Mediaite’s post and all shall be revealed. I saw her tweet moments after she posted it and figured it meant the Ground Zero mosque would be today’s story du jour. (Thanks to a Bloomberg aide sneering at her about racism, it almost was.) Then I noticed the “refudiate” error — which, if you watch Mediaite’s clip, you’ll see wasn’t merely a typo — and realized that this crap would be the story du jour instead. And sure enough, it’s the most-viewed article at WaPo on a day when they’re breaking their big “top secret” expose. As always with a Palin controversy, there’s something for everyone: For her critics, proof that she’s the uneducated yokel they’ve always known she is, and for her fans, proof that she can laugh at both herself and at the media whom she holds in the palm of her hand. James Poniewozik:
Of course, it’s also an example of how well Palin cultivates the media’s obsession with her. Her response to most controversies—don’t steer away from a storm when you can tack into it instead—plays them for maximum heat and exposure. If her response had simply been, “So I said it—what’s the big deal?” it would have been an opportunity missed. When she instead responded that her usage was an example of the living language going back to Shakespeare, it was guaranteed both to enflame her critics (She thinks she’s Shakespeare!) and delight her fans (she beat those know-it-alls at their own game!).
NPR runs down the predictable lefty goofs, which range from dismal (other mocking neologisms) to amusing (Shakespearean quotes Palinized). This won’t hurt her with her base, of course — few things ever do, least of all the sort of vocab mistake to which millions of people can relate. All it’ll do is further prove her unpretentious populist authenticity. But this is actually precisely the kind of innocent gaffe I had in mind when I said the other day that she’d have to run a perfect campaign in the general election to win. Even an error as trivial as this would follow her if made on the trail; the Democrats would flog it relentlessly as anecdotal evidence that she’s the new Quayle, isn’t qualified to be president, etc. Think back to the sort of play that Obama’s “arugula” comment got on the right: It’s a meaningless little nothing in itself, but as a vivid anecdotal detail that tends to bolster an existing narrative (that he’s an elitist) it gained traction. She has the same problem, except that the narrative against her — that she’s unqualified — is potentially far more lethal than the one he faced given the number of people who already question whether she’s qualified. I’m not sure what she can do to beat it when she’s not in office.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
The perception of Biden is that he is a self-important gasbag and perpetual gaffe machine. His own presidential campaigns were failures, and his months as Veep haven’t convinced anyone that he’s ready for the top job.
If Palin is looking to convince voters that she can handle the top job, she’ll have to set the bar higher than Biden.
dedalus on July 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM
Glass houses, stones, etc.
Proud Rino on July 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM
Then don’t call yourself proud. Just call yourself the Idiot Rino.
CWforFreedom on July 19, 2010 at 8:10 PM
Seems like only a few days ago the media were accusing Palin of not writing her Facebook posts or Twitter feed. In fact, didn’t Ed mention that in a post here recently?
Jay Mac on July 19, 2010 at 8:10 PM
She can refudiate me anytime.
docflash on July 19, 2010 at 8:11 PM
Oh, the irony.
INC on July 19, 2010 at 8:11 PM
Are you for real?
sharrukin on July 19, 2010 at 8:12 PM
We have to laugh at the gaffes because his agenda is killing us.
Cindy Munford on July 19, 2010 at 8:13 PM
I told you that he is an assssshole.
CWforFreedom on July 19, 2010 at 8:14 PM
The more sophomoric, petty attacks I see on Palin, the more I think, “Is this all they’ve got now?” It’s a step above making shiz up., which the press have done.
I’m not 100 percent convinced she’s the next Reagan, but I swear her foes with their rhetoric and actions beg me to reconsider.
Sekhmet on July 19, 2010 at 8:15 PM
On the contrary — if she had “not a clue what the word ‘refute’ means”, she could not have made the particular error that produced the accidental portmanteau word.
If someone says, “I refute to answer that question,” than that person has no clue what “refute” means. That’s an error of definition.
The portmanteau error is one that a very intelligent, very right-brained artist friend of mine often makes. I think of it as that his mind keeps words on a shelf, like books — but grouped by topic, not alphabetized — and sometimes when he’s speaking fast he grabs two at once.
Mary in LA on July 19, 2010 at 8:15 PM
I regard to giving Obama a pass if we lay off Palin for her screw up.
Nope. This is different. Do you know why? See Obama, always forever has been presented as a genius he has earned being held to a more exacting standard. That’s how the media sold him, and we should never lay off his imperfections.
In this case there are people, on the Right and Left treating this like world ending event, yet had VP Biden said they’d all enjoy a good chuckle… and Joe is a heartbeat away from the center seat…
I’ll say it again. All kinds of meh.
Sharr on July 19, 2010 at 8:15 PM
What a sec. Is this a Big F’ing Deal like Biden said? No… moving right along.
upinak on July 19, 2010 at 8:16 PM
I picture The Rock saying this
Sekhmet on July 19, 2010 at 8:16 PM
Meanwhile, Ron Burgundy (aka Rick Sanchez) believes the Nixon-Kennedy debates took place in 1962.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2010/07/19/cnns-rick-sanchez-nixon-kennedy-debate-took-place-1962
bw222 on July 19, 2010 at 8:16 PM
And Romney wouldn’t? Why’s that, AP?
ddrintn on July 19, 2010 at 8:17 PM
While we’re at it, I’ll pile on. Why are you “proud” of being a RINO (Republican In Name Only)? That’s like calling yourself “Proud Hypocrite.” Are you proud to be a hypocrite?
Mary in LA on July 19, 2010 at 8:17 PM
+ one trillion.
Cindy Munford on July 19, 2010 at 8:17 PM
The mistake was minor. The press reaction to the mistake was hysterical. Had Obama made the mistake, it would have been totally ignored and anyone mentioning it would have branded “raaaaacist.” So what else is new? If we don’t react hysterically to the hysteria (and even treat what happened with a little good humor) this will quickly fade away.
Palin’s main problem, however, would seem to her own family which , at times,appears to be as chaotic and undisciplined as the Bundys in ‘Married with Children’.If she can’t control them, it’s all over for her.
MaiDee on July 19, 2010 at 8:19 PM
I suspect autoantonyms would have PR’s head spinning. Obviously, PR is not capable of handling complexity.
CWforFreedom on July 19, 2010 at 8:19 PM
Refudiate this about the subject of Sarah Palin’s tweet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUiysSau8Qk
macncheez on July 19, 2010 at 8:19 PM
I give anyone a pass on gaffes or mispronunciations or misspellings or occasional misuse of words. In Obama’s case, we harp on his miscues because he inexplicably has this reputation as a brilliant intellectual.
ddrintn on July 19, 2010 at 8:19 PM
Much like with Chudi TheBlueSite is not really about fairness in this discussion. I suspect you know that.
CWforFreedom on July 19, 2010 at 8:21 PM
It’ll fade away anyhow, just as that stoooooooopid writing of notes on her hand did.
ddrintn on July 19, 2010 at 8:24 PM
Your plan would work if the media had removed their lips from the current administrations backside long enough to point out their gaffes…
The point (since you missed it) is that every Palin gaffee gets amplified, and every Obama gaffe suppressed.
I’ll look for your post the next time Biden screws something up.
I’m sure you’ll be first to refudiate him.
massrighty on July 19, 2010 at 8:24 PM
I like Mittens. I even voted for him in a primary a long time ago in a far away land. And Newt is a smart guy. They are both smart, likeable, bipartisan types who probably won’t make too many gaffes… just like Bob Dole and John McCain.
After 2012, we need to: repeal Obamacare, reign in entitlement spending, cut the deficit, all while cutting our taxes.
Do you really think Mitt or Newt is willing to tackle all of that? No. They don’t have the manparts.
They are going to play it safe. They will make some mamby pamby noises about taxes and the deficit to pacify the base. If they manage to get elected, they will sit on their thumbs and it will be all Romneycare and sitting on the AGW couch making out with Nancy. Meanwhile, Congress goes back on it’s spending spree. We will just go bankrupt slowly instead of at the present pace.
bitsy on July 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM
Mary in LA on July 19, 2010 at 8:15 PM
The two words have very dissimilar meanings. That, and in her “corrected” tweet, she used the word refute when she means repudiate.
I’d guess from the 3 gaffes that she thinks refute and repudiate mean the same, or nearly the same, thing.
TheBlueSite on July 19, 2010 at 8:31 PM
Quite a catch from a media website that made up a word to name themselves…
crazywater on July 19, 2010 at 8:31 PM
Yeah but Obama got elected. Arugla and 57 states and bitter clingers… voters didn’t really care on 2008.
2012 will be a radically different climate, though.
After 4 years of Barack and Michelle Antionette’s let them eat cake routine, “elitist” will be an even more toxic label than whatever they meme du jour is for Palin.
bitsy on July 19, 2010 at 8:32 PM
When Obama and Biden’s many gaffes get the same 24/7 attention from the MSM,Pundits,and the entertainment industry…..then you will have a valid point.
Right now you are comparing apples to oranges.
Baxter Greene on July 19, 2010 at 8:33 PM
Good thing Twitters is up and running so the media corpse in all 57 states can get all wee-weed – up about Mrs. Palin, instead of allowing all gun and bible clingers to watch those profit and earning ratios…or the White Sox at Cominsky Center..I wonder what repudiate is in Austrian ? Anybody seen an unbroken line of fallen heroes in an audience today ? But we all have moments when we wish we calibrated words differently, or spent time honing up those dollars don’t we ?
runner on July 19, 2010 at 8:35 PM
Mary in LA on July 19, 2010 at 8:15 PM
Not so very dissimilar. They both have in common the concept of “to reject”. To “refute” is to reject a premise by logical argument, while to “repudiate” is to reject an idea or concept by appeal to emotion or morality (either from pudium, kick, or from pudere, to shame).
Mary in LA on July 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM
First, who cares?
Second they are somewhat close…
Repudiate;
Deny the truth or validity of
Refute;
Prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
sharrukin on July 19, 2010 at 8:38 PM
Ditto, man up!
CTSherman on July 19, 2010 at 8:41 PM
This particular bigot obviously hasn’t seen Ed’s “Obamateurism of the Day” feature for the last year (and more).
CurtZHP on July 19, 2010 at 8:41 PM
So to “refudiate” something is to reject it on both logical and moral grounds — a perfect (though unintentional) synthesis! :-)
I think I like it. I will never misunderestimate Ms Palin’s strategery again. :-)
Mary in LA on July 19, 2010 at 8:41 PM
Is that an issue for you?
jimmy2shoes on July 19, 2010 at 8:47 PM
Megadittos, Mary in LA. Well said. My thought exactly.
petefrt on July 19, 2010 at 8:49 PM
Stop it with this nonsense.
Romney is a coward and a loser. He represents the very worst American politics has to offer. He has no core values and no direction. He is a political opportunist who sticks his finger in the wind every morning to figure out who to be today.
Instead of fighting for Liberty and Freedom, he only cares about 2012. His naked lust for the presidency is disgusting.
He needs to go find a nice used car store to work at. That or learn how to play a musical instrument and then team up with Lonesome Rhodes Huckabee and the Little Rockers.
Willard Romney will NEVER be POTUS. EVER.
gary4205 on July 19, 2010 at 8:49 PM
How embarrassing for her detractors.
Inanemergencydial on July 19, 2010 at 8:51 PM
That was piling on?
No, it’s just a joke, Mary. I’m basically a centrist, and I have a few more right wing opinions than left wing opinions, so I identify as a Republican, but obviously I’m no Sarah Palin. Just poking fun at myself, that’s all.
Proud Rino on July 19, 2010 at 8:51 PM
But the prospect that she planted that little portmanteau word intentionally intrigues me. I shall be watching.
petefrt on July 19, 2010 at 8:52 PM
We knew that already.
massrighty on July 19, 2010 at 8:52 PM
I agree. Unfortunately, there is a lot of bigotry toward Mormons in this country, especially in the South, and you need to win some southern states in order to win the GOP nomination. Very sad, too. Mormons are great. Just watch the BYU library commercials on youtube, they’re hysterical!
Proud Rino on July 19, 2010 at 8:53 PM
Yes. That’s why I said, “obviously,” massrighty.
Proud Rino on July 19, 2010 at 8:54 PM
I care less about his religion than I care about his endless flopping about on issues and how phony he comes across.
powerpro on July 19, 2010 at 8:55 PM
So when you say RINO, Republican In Name Only, you don’t actually mean Republican In Name Only?
Huh!
sharrukin on July 19, 2010 at 8:58 PM
Funny I just watched an episode of Seinfeld and George was “being opposite” of everything he believed in, values, etc. so everything worked out for him; Jerry, no matter what happened always “broke even” and Ellen was on the downside and she said at the end that “she turned into George”, got kicked out of her house and her boyfriend broke up with her.
I am very happy with my “approximate” Sarah; better than the worse of the worst that is far away of the WH right now. If we had a nickel for every typo we made…we’d be filthy stinking rich!
ProudPalinFan on July 19, 2010 at 8:58 PM
Yeah he might not have won anyway, he has serious problems – the flip flopping isn’t that bad, really, but he comes off as very insincere and more than a little wooden. I mean, I think he’s terrific and I probably would vote for him in 2012, but his being Mormon means that a lot of voters in places like Tennessee, Kentucky, the Carolinas, etc. will never vote for him under any circumstances, because they think the Mormon faith is evil or something.
Proud Rino on July 19, 2010 at 8:59 PM
I’m a Tennessee voter and when the primaries came in 2008 to TN, all that was left was Mitt and Mac.
For the first time in my life, I bowed out of a primary race. They are both equally not conservative enough for me and both have had serious credibility issues in my book.
powerpro on July 19, 2010 at 9:01 PM
Well, it wasn’t piling on very hard… ;-)
Mary in LA on July 19, 2010 at 9:02 PM
9.6, 9.8, 9.9, even a 9.4 from the East German judges!
Well Done!
massrighty on July 19, 2010 at 9:03 PM
It’s not that she “made a mistake” it’s the way she handled it, and brought even more attention to the mosque story, while running the left, and Allah crazy.
The woman has a talent for being able to do this. It’ll be fun to watch her do this from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
gary4205 on July 19, 2010 at 9:06 PM
‘Bye for now — time to bake a potatoE for dinner. ;-)
Mary in LA on July 19, 2010 at 9:06 PM
No one cares that Obama can’t say corpsman because it is a military word and everyone knows Obama has never studied or talked about military things in his entire life. It would be like Palin misprounouncing some French philosopher from the 20s. It is expected.
Speedwagon82 on July 19, 2010 at 9:06 PM
I know, right? Philosophy as a field of study is so worthless. And French people? I mean, what do they know?
Proud Rino on July 19, 2010 at 9:09 PM
And 57 states? How does that get explained in your theory?
Obama can’t be expected to know the United States has 50 states, because…
sharrukin on July 19, 2010 at 9:10 PM
Gee, all the people on this thread who are using “refudiate” as an excuse to slam Sarah Palin and her supporters — they turn out to be EXACTLY THE SAME people who ALWAYS slam Sarah Palin and her supporters. Gee, who would have expected THAT? :p
Aitch748 on July 19, 2010 at 9:12 PM
Obama Gives Shout Out to ‘Congressional Medal of Honor Winner’ Who Isn’t
….after the shout out to Crow he finally got around to addressing the terrorist attack at FT. Hood.
…..Bows to just about anybody.
…Dam# Obama’s smart!!!!
(via Instapundit)
….Sigh…..Constitutional genius you know….
Former Constitutional Lawyer Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During SOTU Address
In last night’s State of the Union Address, President Obama said:
Um, wrong founding document, Mr. President. It is in our Declaration of Independence that we read:
And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech.
.
…Obama is a Geography genius also….
…I bet he also thinks Europe might tip over like Guam.
..and Obama is a medical genius to…
Obama: I want to be president of all 57 states
Obama’s safety net: the TelePrompter
By: Carol E. Lee
March 5, 2009 01:04 PM EST
…..because having to have your every word spelled out and presented to you is a sign of real intelligence in liberal land……
Businesses will hire if they can get loans to cover payroll
Obama:
….this is considered high intelligence to liberals….
Obama’s on fire:
President Obama and Economics 101
Shouldn’t a President of the US know that “P/E Ratio” means “price-to-earnings ratio,” not “profit and earnings ratio?” There is a difference.
Confirmed: DVDs that Obama gave Gordon Brown are the wrong format
Obama
State of the Union Address
Feb. 24,2009
…we did not invent the automobile genius….
Obama: Corpsman
Next time, maybe a White House staffer should make sure that all of the hard words really are spelled phonetically — or maybe our Commander in Chief should familiarize himself with the nation’s military instead.
“Let me be absolutely clear,” Sen. Barack Obama,
…..No Letterman jokes or the ladies on the view expressing how this proves what an idiot Obama is….
No Washington Post articles or liberal pundits using these as evidence that Obama is not ready for prime time.
…can’t have it both ways liberals….if gaffes are proof of ignorance…..
…..then Obama is the King of Stupid.
Baxter Greene on July 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM
after going to CBS site and all the furor over this and realized one thing…
Sarah Palin is a media genius and plays the liberals like a violin. Did she do this on purpose? refudiate? In order to attack Sarah about refudiate, liberals had to promote her entire tweet and the other one two… about the Muslim mosque at ground zero… fantastic media manipulation by Sarah Palin. An issue the lame stream media did not want to touch has now gone viral and all over the place… the mosque… not refudiate.
Look, no matter what happens in the next three years… whether Sarah runs or not… she has already given us more for the conservative movement than anyone has for the last 10 years… even if she left the national stage and returned to Alaska and went fishing… she would have done more for conservatives in the last few years than anyone else.
PhilipJames on July 19, 2010 at 9:31 PM
Who cares about Mormons? This has absolutely nothing to do with Romney’s religion. This is all about the fact that Romney is an unprincipled loser. A political coward who refuses to engage in the fight to save our nation, but thinks the country owes him the presidency.
gary4205 on July 19, 2010 at 9:38 PM
And here I thought she was just trying to emphasize her disdain for the mosque at GZ in asking her followers to reFUdiate it!
howIroll on July 19, 2010 at 9:45 PM
Refute
re·fute/riˈfyo͞ot/Verb1. Prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
2. Prove that (someone) is wrong
—————————-
Repudiate
re·pu·di·ate/riˈpyo͞odēˌāt/Verb1. Refuse to accept or be associated with.
2. Deny the truth or validity of.
—————————-
Boy that Palin sure is stoooopid. Comingling two words that mean basically the same thing and all. What a dope!
OxyCon on July 19, 2010 at 10:01 PM
cane_loader on July 19, 2010 at 7:31 PM
Hi, placed both notes on my FB page. Hope my 0.2 can help. Thanks for the heads-up.
ProudPalinFan on July 19, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Oh, yay-uh, day-on hay-er in the South we dewwww hate us some Mormons! But weer just pore rednecks who hate a lot anyways…
ddrintn on July 19, 2010 at 10:09 PM
Maybe she oughta quote Shakespeare: “oh, if i were an open arse and my love a poperin pear.”
SilentWatcher on July 19, 2010 at 10:13 PM
Refudiate is a fine portmanteau word, giving us a fresh, useful, double-edged form of tired, old refute, by folding in a repudiation, as well ~ergo: to refudiate.
We will refudiate the Democrat Congress this November.
Big Time.
profitsbeard on July 19, 2010 at 10:30 PM
Should we give you a pass on not knowing what is indicative of “not even having a clue what x means”.
Actually the two words she mixed up are quite similar repudiate: to reject as having no authority or binding force, and refute: “overthrow by argument or proof”.
Axeman on July 19, 2010 at 10:54 PM
“Refudiate” is good. But it’s not as good as “absotively,” which I first heard in the movie “Mannequin” back in the 1980s. To this day I still say it.
And as for Palin being an uneducated hillbilly, let me just point out that the Ivy League guys got us trillions into debt.
Anyone want to refudiate that?
NebCon on July 19, 2010 at 10:57 PM
Damn dominant liberal mainstream media ba$tards ……… mis-refudiating what she said!! Liberal A$$holes!
bannedbyhuffpo on July 19, 2010 at 11:07 PM
Ah, the perils of tweeting…
Well, plenty of others have gotten in deep with tweets. No reason she would or should not recognize the dangers.
AnninCA on July 19, 2010 at 11:18 PM
Isn’t there an inhalator for keyboards yet?
Inanemergencydial on July 19, 2010 at 11:35 PM
There is a theory going around that Palin used the word “refudiate” on purpose because she knew the LSM would jump on it and bring more attention to the tweet…if so well played …well played… because you can’t read about the incident without reading about that mosque…
CCRWM on July 19, 2010 at 11:44 PM
That defies commonsense. She just blew it. That’s all. Not in a big way, either, in my opinion…but she didn’t do herself any favors.
Her main problem is being taken seriously, and tweeting is truly dangerous stuff.
AnninCA on July 19, 2010 at 11:47 PM
No on both counts…
Sharr on July 19, 2010 at 11:50 PM
Perhaps, since she’s making eleventy gazillion dollars a year as a Fox contributor and best selling author, she could just hire a high-school graduate to vet her tweets before they go live?
In the ad biz, we have a motto. “Never do anything on purpose which everyone else will think is a mistake. Cleanup is a lot more work than just getting it right the first time.”
HTL on July 19, 2010 at 11:56 PM
Yet another example of allah’s anti-palin mess.
allah she doesn’t have to be perfect. she doesn’t have to not make a mistake for her to win. she just has to be better than all the rest of the clowns running. she is not running against the “perfect” Obama or the “perfect Mitt” Both Obama and mitt are human and so is all the rest of the idiots running. Palin simply has to be better then them not perfect.
This post reminds me of all of allah’s anti-palin posts but most of the july 3rd 2009 post where he said Palin was done. In both those posts Allah’s emotion of happiness seethe through his words. It is like he istrying to dance on Palin’s grave with a mug full of ale and a happy tune on his lips.
Then when he sobers up he says “did I do that last night?”
Allah gets drunk on anything he thinks will hurt Palin. It is a little sickening to watch.
unseen on July 19, 2010 at 11:59 PM
Oh come on, I personally defended Palin pretty easily on this one on a liberal blog. Obama has tons of gaffes to quote.
This will be a blip, at best.
AnninCA on July 20, 2010 at 12:02 AM
Well, I’d have to disagree. It was a tweet mistake which just ate up a day of news, and tweeting is dangerous, in my opinion, for politicians.
It’s not a great medium, anyway. I’d cut back and then eliminate them entirely if I were her.
AnninCA on July 20, 2010 at 12:04 AM
This will be a blip, at best.
AnninCA on July 20, 2010 at 12:02 AM
Knowing Palin she will use it to point out all the gaffes of Obama over the 18 mobnths. I look for her to come out and say ther eare 57 states in the country of Europe who speak austrian and have 3 divisions of corpsemen under arms,
unseen on July 20, 2010 at 12:06 AM
As I said up thread, were it not this it would have been something else. I the grander scheme, not really a big deal and in fact proves she’s real and not attached to a teleprompter and flackies who write her stuff.
Hmm I don’t know overall it seems to be working for her. The only good “cutting back” does is removes one less way for her to broadside Obama. The same could be said for Facebook, yet as a platform it has served her well.
And Unseen is right, provided she wants Sarah Palin could now use this to highlight any of a number of Obama gaffes.
Sharr on July 20, 2010 at 12:20 AM
That would actually be a mistake. Its more an Obama thing, SArah Palin’s all about being on the stump, that is her power. Getting a flacky to vet her “stuff” in the medium of Twitter or Facebook is very artificial and DC insider way of going about things.
I’ll take genuine over… Obama any day.
Sharr on July 20, 2010 at 12:23 AM
Look. We have folks with the same mindset as AP that think that any mistake at all by Palin is near fatal…proving what they all “KNOW” about Palin. That she’s just some dumb hick from the sticks.
So to them, she just HAS to be perfect or forget it!
But the thing is… that’s impossible.
No one can run a perfect campaign. Gaffes…unintentional boo boos and self inflicted wounds come with the territory.
The issue is NOT about being perfect.
The issue is knowing how to manage when a gaffe is made. How to treat a mistake or perceived misstep.
I watch politics pretty closely…and I’ve got to tell ya…Palin is one of the best I’ve ever seen in this regard. Sure, some of her responses have fallen flat…but for the most part, she has a natural knack for knowing how to turn something around so that she comes out smelling like roses and those criticize her look petty and elite-ish.
That is a gift that very few people have and I think one that will serve her well should she choose to run.
powerpro on July 20, 2010 at 12:31 AM
CUDA
Metro on July 20, 2010 at 12:41 AM
Exactly what I was thinking! I suppose now they’ll accuse her of FINALLY writing something and making a mess of it.
Phoenician on July 20, 2010 at 8:03 AM
ABC GMA led with this for a hot news story. Don’t they have more important things to call news? Geeze.
wi farmgirl on July 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM
That’s a very interesting theory!
The American people do need to hear about the mosque and stop it being built.
Sarah emerges as the Heroine once again (as with the girls b-ball team v. AZ boycott, the jihadi attack ship that ran Israeli barricades, Neda’s story in Iran, etc.).
Jenfidel on July 20, 2010 at 9:14 AM
lol on the “wee wee’d up”. It’s breathtaking how totally obsessed the MSM is with taking down Sarah Palin, while Obama’s DOJ files a legal brief saying the healthcare mandate IS a tax (gee, did Obama lie to George Snuffaloffugus?) In his heart of hearts, I’m sure Georgie S. was happy to be the conduit for such a preposterous lie.
olesparkie on July 20, 2010 at 9:15 AM
I wonder if Snuffaloffugus will refudiate Messiah Obama’s earlier assertions?
olesparkie on July 20, 2010 at 9:16 AM
She’s not running for President. She’s too smart for that. She’s positioning herself to be the gotta-have-it endorsement in local and state races across the country. She will deliver the Mom vote to conservative female candidates from one coast to the other.
skydaddy on July 20, 2010 at 9:55 AM
“Refudiate” is a very easy unintentional mistyping for repudiate.
rlwo2008 on July 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM
Why is she too “smart” for that?
Jenfidel on July 20, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Refutiate sounds like a George W. Bush conjunction. However, Bush’s were verbal impromptus.
Though Spell Check still requires proofing and may be a hassle, before publication, someone needs to proof read.
maverick muse on July 20, 2010 at 10:40 AM
Refute
Repute
Not the same.
maverick muse on July 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM
It’s Twitter, for cryin’ out loud. No spell check, and typos get through. But I don;t think it’s a typo. It’s the sort of thing “regular folks” in flyover country might say in everyday conversation. it was in all likelihood inadvertent. But her reaction to the MSM’s reaction was pure marketing genius – she’s drawn the Eye of Sauron, now keep it focused for another cycle. Oh and by the way, get folks to wake up to the fact that people want to build a mosque on the 9/11 site.
Because she can have a heck of a lot more fun doing what she’s doing now, and is clearly very good at – raising the profile of conservative candidates and issues, drawing the media spotlight, and raising funds. She clearly doesn’t care what the MSM says about her.
skydaddy on July 20, 2010 at 10:56 AM
Will an English Lit. grad provide some of the new words that Shakespeare liked to coin?
maverick muse on July 20, 2010 at 10:56 AM
Shakespeare’s Latin neologisms
maverick muse on July 20, 2010 at 10:59 AM
Sarah’s about more than “having fun:” she cares about the country and if she thinks the country needs her leadership in 2012, she will run for President.
Jenfidel on July 20, 2010 at 11:06 AM
royal standard
maverick muse on July 20, 2010 at 11:19 AM
otherwise
maverick muse on July 20, 2010 at 11:31 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »