The media’s got a fee-vah and the only prescription is more “refudiate”

posted at 6:42 pm on July 19, 2010 by Allahpundit

It’s a testament to how, er, wee-wee’d up they are over this that 99 percent of you will know what I’m talking about from the headline alone. If you’re among the other one percent, read Mediaite’s post and all shall be revealed. I saw her tweet moments after she posted it and figured it meant the Ground Zero mosque would be today’s story du jour. (Thanks to a Bloomberg aide sneering at her about racism, it almost was.) Then I noticed the “refudiate” error — which, if you watch Mediaite’s clip, you’ll see wasn’t merely a typo — and realized that this crap would be the story du jour instead. And sure enough, it’s the most-viewed article at WaPo on a day when they’re breaking their big “top secret” expose. As always with a Palin controversy, there’s something for everyone: For her critics, proof that she’s the uneducated yokel they’ve always known she is, and for her fans, proof that she can laugh at both herself and at the media whom she holds in the palm of her hand. James Poniewozik:

Of course, it’s also an example of how well Palin cultivates the media’s obsession with her. Her response to most controversies—don’t steer away from a storm when you can tack into it instead—plays them for maximum heat and exposure. If her response had simply been, “So I said it—what’s the big deal?” it would have been an opportunity missed. When she instead responded that her usage was an example of the living language going back to Shakespeare, it was guaranteed both to enflame her critics (She thinks she’s Shakespeare!) and delight her fans (she beat those know-it-alls at their own game!).

NPR runs down the predictable lefty goofs, which range from dismal (other mocking neologisms) to amusing (Shakespearean quotes Palinized). This won’t hurt her with her base, of course — few things ever do, least of all the sort of vocab mistake to which millions of people can relate. All it’ll do is further prove her unpretentious populist authenticity. But this is actually precisely the kind of innocent gaffe I had in mind when I said the other day that she’d have to run a perfect campaign in the general election to win. Even an error as trivial as this would follow her if made on the trail; the Democrats would flog it relentlessly as anecdotal evidence that she’s the new Quayle, isn’t qualified to be president, etc. Think back to the sort of play that Obama’s “arugula” comment got on the right: It’s a meaningless little nothing in itself, but as a vivid anecdotal detail that tends to bolster an existing narrative (that he’s an elitist) it gained traction. She has the same problem, except that the narrative against her — that she’s unqualified — is potentially far more lethal than the one he faced given the number of people who already question whether she’s qualified. I’m not sure what she can do to beat it when she’s not in office.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Jenfidel,

I know she’s about more than “having fun” but I also think she’s smart enough to see that her current role gives her far more influence than she would have as a candidate for office. She’s laser-focused on Nov ’10, not 2012.

maverick,
Nice try painting people as psychotic because they happen to use a mashed-up word.

But, y’know… “the use of words that only have meaning to the person who uses them” … does that mean that Obama’s use of the term, “transparency” mean he’s psychotic?

skydaddy on July 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM

“Corpse-man” .. “corpse-man” .. I need a linguistic “corpse-man” from one of the 57 states

J_Crater on July 20, 2010 at 12:47 PM

What a sec. Is this a Big F’ing Deal like Biden said? No… moving right along.

upinak on July 19, 2010 at 8:16 PM

We must rePudiate Sarah Failin’s gaffe, and Biden said ObamaCare was a Big Puckin’ Deal for three letters, J-O-B-S.

Steve Z on July 20, 2010 at 1:04 PM

So she made a sniglet. Big deal.

Dominion on July 20, 2010 at 1:14 PM

She’s laser-focused on Nov ‘10, not 2012.

skydaddy on July 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM

Oh, true!
We’re all keeping our eyes on the prize…which is to throw the bums out in NOvember and start rolling back the Obamunism.

Jenfidel on July 20, 2010 at 2:42 PM

Hey combatwoman, I was not being sarcastic at all. I think her making up the word refudiate is brilliant not only in its use but in the fact that it causes the left to go crazy.

Brown James on July 20, 2010 at 3:15 PM

Ugh. It was a typo on Twitter. It happens and it doesn’t make any difference.

As far as “proving” it wasn’t a typu, no, Mediaite did not “prove” that. They provided some facts that could be interpreted that way but could be interpreted in many other ways, too. For example: When she retyped the tweet, she tried to be as clear as possible what she was asking “peaceful Muslims” to do. I thought the first tweet was awkwardly phrased even w/o “refudiate”.

AnninCA, I agree she might want to ditch the twitter account because it’s not very helpful. What does she put out on Twitter that she can’t via Facebook? It just gives opportunities for people to mock her. Technology ought to be helpful and if not then it should be discarded.

alwaysfiredup on July 20, 2010 at 3:28 PM

gary4205 on July 19, 2010 at 8:49 PM

A lot of good you did making sure Obama NEVER became POTUS. EVER.

Caps lock doesn’t make your predictions so.

scotash on July 20, 2010 at 4:21 PM

I love the new word. It’s a snickerdoodle. What’s the big deal? I’m refudiating anyone who says otherwise!
Signed
Daughter of an Army Air Corpse Corpsman

Nalea on July 21, 2010 at 3:49 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4