Zuckerman: Obamanomics “our economic Katrina”

posted at 2:15 pm on July 17, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

How far out of favor has Barack Obama fallen with the business community?  Self-professed Obama supporter and occasional speechwriter Mort Zuckerman wrote a lengthy indictment of Obama’s economic policies in US News & World Report yesterday afternoon, outlining the many ways in which Obama has shown his hostility to capital and private markets.  Zuckerman blasted his “gratuitous and overstated demonization of business,” and a lot more:

But one unfortunate pattern that has emerged in the last 18 months is to lay all the blame for our difficulties only on the business community and the financial world. This quite ignores the role of Congress in many areas, but most glaringly in forcing Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Housing Administration to back loans to people who could not afford them. And not to mention the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which in 2004 sanctioned higher levels of leverage for financial firms, from 12 times equity to over 30 times equity.

This predilection to blame business is manifest in the unnecessary and provocative anti-business sentiment revealed by President Obama in a recent speech that was supposed to be seeking the support of the business community for a doubling of exports over the next five years. “In the absence of sound oversight,” he said, “responsible businesses are forced to compete against unscrupulous and underhanded businesses, who are unencumbered by any restrictions on activities that might harm the environment, or take advantage of middle-class families, or threaten to bring down the entire financial system.” This kind of gratuitous and overstated demonization of business is exactly the wrong approach. It ignores the disappointment of a stimulus program that was ill-designed to produce the jobs the president promised—that famous 8 percent unemployment ceiling.

As we have discussed, the media and the Democrats seem to forget about the primary role previous government interventions had in creating our current mess.  The anti-capital rhetoric has been a calculation designed to distract people from the failure of previous social engineering — so that Democrats can offer even more interventions as a tonic, which is akin to offering Socrates a nice glass of potassium cyanide to cure his hemlock hangover.  But it’s not just the rhetoric, Zuckerman insists, and delivers a devastating conclusion:

But it’s not just the rhetoric that undermines the confidence the business community needs to find if it is to invest. Consider the new generation of regulatory rules, increased bureaucracy, and higher taxes created by the Obama administration. For example, the new financial regulation bill includes nearly 500 “rule-makings,” studies, and reports, compared with just 14 in total for the controversial Sarbanes-Oxley bill, passed after the financial scandals of Enron and WorldCom. The disillusionment has spread to the Business Roundtable, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), which represents small businesses that normally account for roughly 60 percent of job creation.

The chief economist of the NFIB, William Dunkelberg, put it clearly: Small business owners “do not trust the economic policies in place or proposed.” He also said, “The U.S. economy faces hurricane force headwinds and the government is at the center of the storm, making an economic recovery very difficult.”

Our economic Katrina, in short.

I’d say that the Hopeandchangillusion has worn off from Zuckerman and the entire business community — and the rest of those not living within ivory towers.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Guard your front lawn well, Zuckerman, you’re about to get a few hundred purple-shirted visitors.

Bishop on July 17, 2010 at 2:19 PM

He has no one but himself to blame. He supported Obama. I’m sure he’s intelligent enough to have been able to research what Obama has actually accomplished before running for President and I’m sure his search turned up a dismal record.

ButterflyDragon on July 17, 2010 at 2:21 PM

Our economic Katrina?

Try our economic Krakatoa!

pilamaye on July 17, 2010 at 2:23 PM

“The U.S. economy faces hurricane force headwinds and the government is at the center of the storm, making an economic recovery very difficult.”

“Very Difficult?” Um, sir, “Not Possible”. Additionally, Jan 1, 2011 it really hits the fan. Many new and deep taxes take effect on that day, along with a raft of new regulations and a lot of new paperwork.

These are what I call “Disaster Multipliers.” our economic situation will become an order or magnitude worse because snowballs rolling downhill gather mass and momentum.

dogsoldier on July 17, 2010 at 2:25 PM

How could they not have expected this? If we could see it coming all the way back before the election, how could these heads of industry not?

Dee2008 on July 17, 2010 at 2:26 PM

BP changed it’s name from the British and NORTH AMERICAN Petroleum organization (due it’s takeover of Amoco) not from British Petroleum.

The British are blaming AMOCO, headquartered in Chicago, for the Lockerbie deal.

“Chicago”

Corporatist

Dr Evil on July 17, 2010 at 2:26 PM

Obama is bad for business….?

No sh!t Sherlock.
When did you figure it out ?

NeoKong on July 17, 2010 at 2:27 PM

I don’t feel one bit sorry for you mort. You and others voted for and funded big time to get this bho and the d’s in power. Now, they are seeing just what this bho and team are trying to do to you and our country. Mort, you feel bad, well, how the heck do you think us less than wealthy American’s feel? How about you, mort and others, fund r’s to see if we can put a stop to this bho and team come Nov. and 2012?

letget on July 17, 2010 at 2:28 PM

Hey Mort, why not write a speech for Obama’s telepromter so that he finally takes ownership for our nation’s dismal economy.

bbh on July 17, 2010 at 2:31 PM

As we have discussed, the media and the Democrats seem to forget about the primary role previous government interventions had in creating our current mess.

Bingo. The other day when Obama was talking about the financial reform bill, he talked about greed and recklessness and blah, blah, blah. Not once did he mention the CRA, Fannie and Freddie, HUD and Congress’s (mostly Dems) role in creating the mess.

In fact, the biggest insult is when he stood there and complimented and thanked Barney Frank and Chris Dodd for their leadership in crafting the bill. It’s disgusting that the two people who probably played the biggest role in creating the mess get to now write the new rules. What an unserious country.

JohnInCA on July 17, 2010 at 2:31 PM

Obamanomics Obamawful

Hening on July 17, 2010 at 2:31 PM

Subtract one from the Unicorn order form. Millions more go.

Electrongod on July 17, 2010 at 2:32 PM

Obamanomics, just like Stalin-agriculturalism … when there isn’t enough food, blame the hungry, then kill them.

In this case Obama blames business for disaster democrats created, and his solution is to destroy as many businesses as possible.

Gee, I suppose Marxism just hasn’t found the right people yet to do it the right way. We will ever learn?

darwin on July 17, 2010 at 2:33 PM

He has no one but himself to blame. He supported Obama. I’m sure he’s intelligent enough to have been able to research what Obama has actually accomplished before running for President
ButterflyDragon on July 17, 2010 at 2:21 PM

You have to cut the guy some slack. It’s not like he owns a newspaper or a magazine or something. Oh wait…

veni vidi vici on July 17, 2010 at 2:33 PM

The problem, Ed, is that it’s not just the people in ivory towers. I’m in an argument on facebook right now with a liberal friend of mine, and he seems to regard all these new taxes and regulations as a feature, not a bug. Most liberals honestly believe the robber baron talk, and they truly see the government as a way to address these so-called wrongs. We can hit them over the head with reams of evidence, but it simply doesn’t make a difference. These are the people in power.

Badger in KC on July 17, 2010 at 2:34 PM

Subtract one from the Unicorn order form. Millions more go. Electrongod on July 17, 2010 at 2:32 PM

Wow, amen to that. Only 49,999,999 left to cross over to the light side.

Mojave Mark on July 17, 2010 at 2:36 PM

Looks like Owebama ain’t the guy to make communism work either.

Wonder if Zuckerman still thinks Obama is smart?

jukin on July 17, 2010 at 2:38 PM

Arriving in a small jet before the Obamas was the first dog, Bo, a Portuguese water dog given as a present by the late U.S. Sen Ted Kennedy, D-Mass.; and the president’s personal aide Reggie Love, who chatted with Baldacci.

Off topic a little, but WTF is this? A private jet for the F-ing dog. So, according to the global warming hype, I’ve got to drive a hybrid or take public transportation but the dog gets a private jet. Seriously, WTF?

Couldn’t Bo and Reggie Love squeeze into AF1. Who are the robber barons again?

JohnInCA on July 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM

Pity the “spread the wealth” comment didn’t clue you in Mort.

Yeesh.

rbj on July 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM

We can hit them over the head with reams of evidence, but it simply doesn’t make a difference. These are the people in power.

Badger in KC on July 17, 2010

When you argue with a liberal you are arguing against his feelings, not his intellect. It is not a level field and you can never win in that kind of battle.

Extrafishy on July 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM

I’d say that the Hopeandchangillusion has worn off from Zuckerman and the entire business community — and the rest of those not living within ivory towers.

It’s a little, isn’t it? How’d these people get into the positions they are in and be this damn dumb?

ladyingray on July 17, 2010 at 2:41 PM

Zuckerman sides with the racists…

mjbrooks3 on July 17, 2010 at 2:44 PM

“The anti-capital rhetoric has been a calculation designed to distract people from the failure of previous social engineering —…”

And in not one interview, is Barney Frank held accountable…

Seven Percent Solution on July 17, 2010 at 2:45 PM

Dear Mort,

0bama’s unjust and unjustified oil drilling moratorium is OUR economic Katrina.

Love, Louisiana.

——–

http://www.rallyforeconomicsurvival.com

http://www.facebook.com/rallyforeconomicsurvival

cane_loader on July 17, 2010 at 2:48 PM

And yet there’s little doubt Zuckerman’s magazine will endorse Obama in 2012 or that Zuckerman will happily vote for Obama in 2012.

RJL on July 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM

Our economic Katrina, in short.

Hey, Mort baby, what was your first clue? It’s not all bad, though. At least Obama’s pants still have a sharp crease.

GrannyDee on July 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM

This Zuckerman guy catches on quick, doesn’t he?

Tav on July 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM

How dare Zuckerman not demonstrate proper reverence for the black holocaust(Katrina).

sarc/

David2.0 on July 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM

I think it is safe to say…

… that if you are not already stocking up on food and water, you better start now.

Seven Percent Solution on July 17, 2010 at 2:52 PM

As we have discussed, the media and the Democrats

Why even bother putting the word and in this sentence, Ed?

Del Dolemonte on July 17, 2010 at 2:53 PM

“I’d say that the Hopeandchangillusion has worn off from Zuckerman and the entire business community — and the rest of those not living within ivory towers.”

Talk’s cheap. Let’s see what they’ll do about it up front and above board. If they run to Romney’ite Republicans, rather than the Tea Partiers, we’ll know they just don’t like the Obama variety of corporatist/statist.

Dusty on July 17, 2010 at 2:53 PM

Am I suppose to feel better that some hot shot billionaire finally realized what a lot everyday smart folks were saying on Hot Air two years ago? Was there a “sorry” anywhere in his realization? I am really developing a bad attitude. I apologize.

Cindy Munford on July 17, 2010 at 2:54 PM

Off topic a little, but WTF is this? A private jet for the F-ing dog. So, according to the global warming hype, I’ve got to drive a hybrid or take public transportation but the dog gets a private jet. Seriously, WTF?

Couldn’t Bo and Reggie Love squeeze into AF1. Who are the robber barons again?

JohnInCA on July 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM

Apparently the plane the dog was on was going to be sent up to Maine anyway-supposedly the airport closest to Mt. Desert Island isn’t big enough for the big 747 AF1 so they are using smaller planes.

Del Dolemonte on July 17, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Mort I wish Madoff would have stolen all your money. You thought you could work with this fascist, you deserve the worst.

borntoraisehogs on July 17, 2010 at 2:58 PM

Good to see Mort is only a few years behind the power curve.

I mean, Barry Obama anti-business? Phew, who could have seen that coming?

Good to see that we’re not only ruled by complete jackass idiots like worthless incompetent Barry Obama, but our fifth estate is equally moronic.

NoDonkey on July 17, 2010 at 2:59 PM

I blame Bush.

I like turtles.

I question the timing.

Will it blend?

hillbillyjim on July 17, 2010 at 3:03 PM

This predilection to blame business is manifest in the unnecessary and provocative anti-business sentiment revealed by President Obama

It is not a predilection, it is part of a strategy. It is not unnecessary, but a necessary part of the strategy. And Obama is not really anti-business. If you are looking for the explanation for something, first look to the simplest explanation as it is likely the most correct one. Like his fellow fascist predecessors, he must humble business to bend it to his will and make it his servant.

Tav on July 17, 2010 at 3:03 PM

It is not a predilection, it is part of a strategy. It is not unnecessary, but a necessary part of the strategy. And Obama is not really anti-business. If you are looking for the explanation for something, first look to the simplest explanation as it is likely the most correct one. Like his fellow fascist predecessors, he must humble business to bend it to his will and make it his servant.

Tav on July 17, 2010 at 3:03 PM

A+

Go to the head of the class.

hillbillyjim on July 17, 2010 at 3:06 PM

This kind of gratuitous and overstated demonization of business is exactly the wrong approach.

Not if you are a fascist.

Tav on July 17, 2010 at 3:06 PM

As much as I dislike the policies of the Obama Administration, I would extend them a great deal of credit if they would just come out and say: “We underestimated the severity and root causes of the economic disaster, and thus we felt it was more important to address the 80-year backlog of progressive social programs we’ve failed to implement while we had the filibuster-proof Congress to do it.”

This wouldn’t change anything, but it would at least be the first sign of intellectual honesty.

BKeyser on July 17, 2010 at 3:09 PM

I’d say that the Hopeandchangillusion has worn off from Zuckerman and the entire business community — and the rest of those not living within ivory towers.

One November day that now seems so long ago
When I was not so smart you know
A smooth talking man came to me
And spoke of all the things he would do for the country
He would chase away all the blue
It seemed like such a dream
It seemed like he knew just what to do
I never even suspected it was all just a scheme
“Come vote for me!” he said with such a smile
“Just get high on my hope and change for a while”
But now I understand
Now I understand
Now, now, now, now, I understand
He’s nothing put a fascist destructo man.

Cheshire Cat on July 17, 2010 at 3:12 PM

Capitalism and freedom are some of the pillars on what this great nation was built. From the left you keep on hearing that capitalism is a failure. Meanwhile the radicals are inside the govt and destroying the foundations from within.

Zorgon on July 17, 2010 at 3:13 PM

But one unfortunate pattern that has emerged in the last 18 months is to lay all the blame for our difficulties only on the business community and the financial world

Point of order: That “unfortunate pattern” emerged about 18 months before “the last 18 months.” In fact, it was a platform for Obama’s campaign.

Daydream believers like the Suckerman here just couldn’t hear what Obama was saying over the defining sound of all the unicorn wings.

29Victor on July 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM

For example, the new financial regulation bill includes nearly 500 “rule-makings,” studies, and reports, compared with just 14 in total for the controversial Sarbanes-Oxley bill, passed after the financial scandals of Enron and WorldCom.

WTF. How can businesses expect to comply with this?

I think large and small businesses should begin to send notices to their members of Congress and senators informing them that they plan to forward their invoices for the cost of increased accounting and legal compliance. And they should make no bones about it–informing their local papers and all their employees. Beyond that, if I owned a business, I fired every employee who wasn’t absolutely necessary if I knew they voted for Obama.

BuckeyeSam on July 17, 2010 at 3:22 PM

For example, the new financial regulation bill includes nearly 500 “rule-makings,” studies, and reports, compared with just 14 in total for the controversial Sarbanes-Oxley bill, passed after the financial scandals of Enron and WorldCom.

Argh. The merry rulemakers strike again. Dodd should be hounded all the way to Scotland.

journeyintothewhirlwind on July 17, 2010 at 3:26 PM

Welcome to reality, Mort. Too bad it took you so long to get here.

AZCoyote on July 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM

I’d say that the Hopeandchangillusion has worn off from Zuckerman and the entire business community — and the rest of those not living within ivory towers.

Zuckerman’s sudden panic nourishes me. They were warned by us over here, but chose to get caught up in whatever magic Obama was spreading.

SouthernGent on July 17, 2010 at 3:28 PM

Please someone tell me again why business willingly supported Obamas election. I mean, how could they be so utterly naive?

docdave on July 17, 2010 at 3:31 PM

Am I suppose to feel better that some hot shot billionaire finally realized what a lot everyday smart folks were saying on Hot Air two years ago? Was there a “sorry” anywhere in his realization? I am really developing a bad attitude. I apologize.

It would seem that a tree that falls in a forest does not make a sound unless and until someone very important like Mort Zuckerman hears it.

Luka on July 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM

Zuckerman’s sudden panic nourishes me. They were warned by us over here, but chose to get caught up in whatever magic Obama was spreading.

SouthernGent on July 17, 2010 at 3:28 PM

He’s just bitter over that he wont get a piece of the loot he expected.
He just learned that there’s no honor among thieves.

the_nile on July 17, 2010 at 3:42 PM

Here is an article I read earlier today which talks about what many have been saying here.

Ruling Class vs Country Class

ny59giants on July 17, 2010 at 3:46 PM

Please someone tell me again why business willingly supported Obamas election. I mean, how could they be so utterly naive?

docdave on July 17, 2010 at 3:31 PM

As they say “You cant fool an honest man” , they thought they were entitled to a profitable part in the obama gangster regime. But they got pushed out when their service were done.

the_nile on July 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM

“Very Difficult?” Um, sir, “Not Possible”. Additionally, Jan 1, 2011 it really hits the fan. Many new and deep taxes take effect on that day, along with a raft of new regulations and a lot of new paperwork.

These are what I call “Disaster Multipliers.” our economic situation will become an order or magnitude worse because snowballs rolling downhill gather mass and momentum.

dogsoldier on July 17, 2010 at 2:25 PM

1/1/11 is when a lot of regulations and taxes begin.

However, this September is when a lot of companies and their employees start to see the glorious benefits of universal health care.

How much will your company or insurance pay to cover your new, required, electronically recorded BMI index? Nothing. It’ll all be “free”.

BowHuntingTexas on July 17, 2010 at 3:50 PM

Guard your front lawn well, Zuckerman, you’re about to get a few hundred purple-shirted visitors.

At least they won’t be brown shirts……oh, wait

Captain America on July 17, 2010 at 3:55 PM

It would seem that a tree that falls in a forest does not make a sound unless and until someone very important like Mort Zuckerman hears it.

Luka on July 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM

That’s O.K. Glad to see the big fissure start to open and the dam bulge outward as it crumbles before the midterms and before the GOP regains any majorities so they get blamed. Now that Mort has run interference, let’s hope there is more to come. Might even make repeal of some of this crap more possible. Should make for some great town halls pre midterms. Popcorn, anyone?

a capella on July 17, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Next he’ll be telling us that Hitler was bad for Jews!

Sharke on July 17, 2010 at 3:57 PM

We’ve all seen what a hard worker Mr. President is, what with his 7 vacations and the hundreds of hours of playing golf he’s done since he took office. When something has been proven not to work, you put your nose to the grindstone and try and come up with something that does. Not Mr. President. Not only does he refuse to admit the stimulus hasn’t worked, he steadfastly travels the country (spending millions along the way) spouting the same old rhetoric about saving and creating jobs, blames the previous administration for today’s problems, and lashes out at the GOP for not supporting his profligate agenda. This isn’t a leader, it’s a crybaby.

scalleywag on July 17, 2010 at 4:02 PM

Is “squeal@whitehouse.gov” still active?

Daggett on July 17, 2010 at 4:04 PM

Mort before you blame congress, before you blame the administration, before you blame Obama; first blame yourself and your efforts in getting these morons in power.

Until you first do that, I don’t give a fig what you write.

PackerBronco on July 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM

What’s wrong with people like Zuckerman? Were they not paying attention?

I’m no economist or business expert, yet Obama’s actions have been in line with my expectations of him. (And I have a lot of company here!).

By their irresponsible votes for Obama, Zuckerman and those like him have brought havoc down on America.

INC on July 17, 2010 at 4:07 PM

Many don’t know this but Zuckerman has been plagued his whole life at being unable to arrive on time to board a train. As a consequence, he knows an incredible amount of details of at least 100 train station boarding platforms.

platypus on July 17, 2010 at 4:18 PM

Try our economic Krakatoa Venusius!

pilamaye on July 17, 2010 at 2:23 PM

Krakatoa changed the weather a bit and blew 3/4ths of itself up but wasn’t a game changer. Venusius ended a civilization. Me thinks that fits better

chemman on July 17, 2010 at 4:22 PM

I praise the Lord, these people are seeing the fraudster for what he is. FRAUD!!!

Lisa on July 17, 2010 at 4:36 PM

OK Mort! Let’s repeal the man-made Katrina!

AshleyTKing on July 17, 2010 at 4:38 PM

Zuckermann is beyond the stage of “buyer’s remorse”. He’s in the product recall phase.

If it were not so detrimental to the land, I’d wish it on him and his.

Schadenfreude on July 17, 2010 at 4:51 PM

Another Obama gummy-snake-sucker writes.

Schadenfreude on July 17, 2010 at 4:54 PM

Economic Katrina? Horse feathers.

It’s an economic Pearl Harbor.

It’s not an unavoidable natural disaster. It’s a blatant, in-your-face declaration of war on business, free enterprise, and freedom period.

notagool on July 17, 2010 at 5:29 PM

’bout friggin’ time.

Tim_CA on July 17, 2010 at 5:42 PM

Thank God my governor is finally speaking for me – and thanks Ed or Allah, whoever, put it in the headlines.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/16/AR2010071605180.html

Here’s Bobby Jindal’s editorial in the Washington Post today on the unjust and unfair drilling moratorium. Hope some of you will take a few minutes to read it. He says it all.

cane_loader on July 17, 2010 at 5:52 PM

It really does seem to me that Bobby Jindal is indicting Obama so heavily, that his article is worth a thread of its own.

Just read what he says about 0bama flouting the judge’s decision.

Another example of despotic rule by 0bama.

cane_loader on July 17, 2010 at 5:54 PM

Our economic Katrina? hmmmmmmmm.

I’d say it’s more like THEIR economic Katrina, and all the negative from it, is just foisted apon the rest of us.

Thank you Zuckerman, and all the other nitwits that vaulted this dimbulb into office. Again I ask…how is it, that a simple citizen like me was able to foresee this coming disaster, with the election of Obama, and a big shot exec couldn’t?

capejasmine on July 17, 2010 at 6:03 PM

When a man pokes a stick at a bear and the bear eats the man, do we not say — he had it coming? Well Zuck, you courted your own bear, wrote a piece for him as well. So don’t lay down a trail of woe that you are being eaten alive.

Remember, you picked up the stick….

Dr. Dog on July 17, 2010 at 6:12 PM

It really does seem to me that Bobby Jindal is indicting Obama so heavily, that his article is worth a thread of its own.

cane_loader on July 17, 2010 at 5:54 PM

There is one, in the HA headlines.

Schadenfreude on July 17, 2010 at 6:26 PM

As we have discussed, the media and the Democrats seem to forget about the primary role previous government interventions had in creating our current mess.

let’s go all the way. let’s say that the media/Dems want this. they are not forgetting. they are not playing a political game. it is who they are. they don’t like business, the people who make things, the people who profit from their smarts are not their friends

on any night of the week you can watch the wonders of innovation in shows like How its Made

Political “scientists” have no use for hard working innovative people…independent people. they want everyone under their thumb.

r keller on July 17, 2010 at 7:33 PM

Mort, like his mag, U.S. News & World Report, has degenerated into a fantasy land where Democrats have real potable plans/ideas for the proles. USN&WR is now a cross between Time and People, with an infrequent editorial about how the world misunderstands Israel thrown in for “balance”. Mort loved the triangulator, (BC), thus betraying his former shaky moderate RINO facade to become a squishy lefty ambulance-chasing moron, offering to service anyone in the WH.

trl on July 17, 2010 at 7:37 PM

Zuckerman’s actually pretty representative of the ‘squishy middle’ that went for Obama in 2008 and is now really angry about it. Remember, Mort endorsed Bush-Cheney in the New York Daily News in 2000 and 2004, and then — like a bunch of other moderates — got swept up in the tide of “Hope and Change” and thought that supporting Obama would be a way to get back into the good graces of the conventional wisdom types in N.Y. and D.C. who had been mad at Zuckerman for his heresy in the previous two presidential elections.

His actions in ’08 and his anger now, make Mort basically the male version of Peggy Noonan, albeit with a ton more money. And of course being part of the squishy middle, there’s still no way to predict who Zuckerman will support in 2012 if Barack’s people can demonize the eventual GOP nominee effectively enough. The bigger problem right now though is those other major media owners who have gone through the same sort of economic abuse over the past 18 months and are still in love with the current administration (many in hopes of eventually weening a government bailout of their company out of the current administration).

jon1979 on July 17, 2010 at 7:51 PM

And Zuckerman’s article will do what? That’s right, nothing. Obama will be elected again in 2012 because repubs are too incompetent to unseat him no matter how bad the economy gets. Meanwhile Collins, Snowe or Brown will guarantee that every major piece of Obama legislation will pass.

How stupid are repub leaders? The three in question remain in the party. The entire repub party stands its ground in an attempt to have a say at the table and these three undermine them such that Obama and the entire Dem party get to make wholesale changes to the economy without any push back.

The current repub leadership is not qualified to lead.

patrick neid on July 17, 2010 at 7:56 PM

Zuckerman is acting as a stalking horse, telegraphing what Obama’s next moves will be.

/Tinfoil hat off.

RedRedRice on July 17, 2010 at 8:01 PM

This wouldn’t change anything, but it would at least be the first sign of intellectual honesty.

BKeyser on July 17, 2010 at 3:09 PM

Intellectual honesty from Democrats?

That’s like asking for the sun to rise in the west and set in the east. Only person who could do that would be God, and before he even began discussing the implications with you he’d say something along the lines of…

“What are you!? Posessed!?”

Chaz706 on July 17, 2010 at 8:20 PM

I guess Mort’s a racist now and the NAACP (National Association of African American Communist Propagandists) will issue a resolution denouncing his racism too.

eaglewingz08 on July 17, 2010 at 9:06 PM

Welcome to the party, Mort… you’re a little late…

Khun Joe on July 17, 2010 at 9:33 PM

Welcome to the party, Mort… you’re a little late…

Khun Joe on July 17, 2010 at 9:33 PM

Mort will be ordering one of these:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=201pgTaEseQ&playnext_from=TL&videos=4pw-rlZ6byE

itsnotaboutme on July 17, 2010 at 9:44 PM

It’s almost as if these “conservatives” like Zuckerman knew Obama was a socialist, but being progressives, they felt that opposing American’s first black candidate for president was below them. So they cheered him on, knowing full well what he was. This is how Obama got elected. So many informed people still voted for him to pay homage to the “historical” election.

Stalin called those who supported him, without knowing the consequences – useful idiots. What do you call someone who actually knew the consequences, knew they were bad, but supported Obama anyway?

keep the change on July 17, 2010 at 9:51 PM

I think I figured out why Zuckerman was unable to research Obama’s background and policies before the election, and why Zuckerman supported Obama. Zuckerman got his MBA from Wharton, and a L.L.M. from Harvard Law School. From my experience the Ivy League and other “top tier” schools don’t teach their students to think or do research, hence his inability to see Obama for what he really is. I’ll have to add Zuckerman to my list of failed Ivy League and “top tier” school failures. This list also includes George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Barack Obama.

MeAlice on July 17, 2010 at 10:26 PM

This quite ignores the role of Congress in many areas, but most glaringly in forcing Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Housing Administration to back loans to people who could not afford them

Wow, where was this guy pre November 2008. And what is worse is this issue is continued and exacerbated in the new finance bill.

brtex on July 17, 2010 at 10:32 PM

Just a little too late to the party, Mort.

Kissmygrits on July 18, 2010 at 9:08 AM

Mystery trader buys all Europe’s cocoa
Even Willy Wonka might struggle to use this much chocolate. Yesterday, somebody bought 241,000 tonnes of cocoa beans.

J_Crater on July 18, 2010 at 1:23 PM

“The U.S. economy faces hurricane force headwinds and the government is at the center of the storm, making an economic recovery very difficult.”

Our economic Katrina, in short.

This was a good presentation by Zuckerman, but a comparatively weak closing.

Better would have been something like:

“The U.S. economy faces Katrina-force headwinds and the government is bombing New Orleans to help assure total destruction.”

landlines on July 18, 2010 at 3:37 PM

I have no idea what convinced Zuck the Schmuck to support The One during his campaign. However, when he did the man was dead to me and I no longer considered anything he has to write worth the ink to print.

MJBrutus on July 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM