Gov’t pushing risky lending again?

posted at 2:55 pm on July 16, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

I missed this Wall Street Journal article from Wednesday, but Tom Elia didn’t.  Just two years after the implosion of easy credit nearly cratered the entire Western financial structure, the same people who caused it are returning to their old habits.  Fannie Mae has embarked on a new program to offer easy credit to people who may not be able to pay it back in a desperate attempt to ignite the economy:

Fannie Mae, seized by the U.S. government in 2008 to avert the mortgage company’s failure, launched an initiative in January that allows some first-time home buyers to get a loan with a down payment of as little as $1,000. Securities firm Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, a brokerage operation jointly owned by Morgan Stanley and Citigroup Inc., is offering some clients home-equity credit lines of as much as $2.5 million.

Credit-card issuers mailed 84.8 million offers of plastic to U.S. subprime borrowers in the first six months of this year, up from 43.7 million a year earlier, estimates research firm Synovate. Nearly 8% of loans for new cars in the latest quarter went to borrowers with the lowest range of credit scores, up from 6.2% in 2009′s fourth quarter, according to J.D. Power & Associates and Fair Isaac Corp. …

Shirley Davis, a 66-year-old retired phone-company administrator who lives in Brooklyn, N.Y., is more than $33,000 in debt, earns just $2,414 a month and filed for bankruptcy in June. Shortly before that, she ripped open an envelope from Capital One Financial Corp., which pitched her a credit card even though it sued her in 2006 to recover $4,470 she owed on a different card from the bank.

“At some point we lost you as a customer and we’d like to have you back,” the letter said. Ms. Davis said she was stunned. “Even I wouldn’t give me a credit card at this point,” she said.

Be sure to watch the video, as it provides some good context. The amount of risk may still be within acceptable ranges, but with unemployment going up and assets in home ownership declining, this seems like a bad call.

It’s especially bad for Fannie Mae. After all, a private lender will have to pay the price for bad decisions — oh, excuse me, that’s not entirely true any more, is it? With Congress passing the financial regulation bill, the federal government now has a regulatory lever to seize private firms and put us all on the hook, just as Congress and two White Houses did with TARP.

However, Fannie Mae is in the middle of a rescue already, and costing taxpayers over $200 billion for it in combination with its sibling GSE, Freddie Mac. It has no business offering $1000-down loans until it cleans up the huge mess left over from its previous subsidizing of bad subprime loans. Want to guess whether they’re securitizing this paper in mortgage-based securities?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

*facepalm*

WisCon on July 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Guess the CEO’s of Fannie and Freddie want to earn a BIG bonus this year. And mental giants like Maxine Waters and Barney Frank will “roll the dice one more time”.

Can’t wait to see “too big to fail” applied to a destroyed US Treasury.

Got ammo?

GarandFan on July 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Filed under Cloward-Piven, Marxism, etc.

Daggett on July 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

They really want to destroy everything

blatantblue on July 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

“At some point we lost you as a customer and we’d like to have you back,” the letter said. Ms. Davis said she was stunned. “Even I wouldn’t give me a credit card at this point,” she said.

But Dear Liar will. Or more accurately, force the credit card companies to give her a credit card.

rbj on July 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Hello! Welcome to the Cloward-Piven Bank of Credit. We are sorry to inform you that you are now the victim of a grave a serious problem facing our Nation. Socialistic Governmental Bank Fraud.

If you would like to speak to a Government Employee to some how get your dwelling back: Press 1

If you would like to know if you need a 2nd Mortgage with Cloward-Piven and to speak to a Government Employee to pay your Tax on your Dwelling: Press 2

All other complaints or questions, please remain on the line and your call will shortly be answered by a Government Employee: Your wait time is; 3.5 years.

upinak on July 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Barney Frank just can’t help himself…

(slobber, slurp, slobber, swallow)

Seven Percent Solution on July 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Filed under Cloward-Piven, Marxism, etc.

Daggett on July 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

File under the very definition of insanity, according to Albert Einstein.

UltimateBob on July 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM

As long as lenders feel they are protected by the government for offering risky loans, they will continue to do so and we the taxpayers will left holding the bag.

You don’t need a long list of regulations; all you need is to do is privatize risk once again. If I were playing Texas Hold ‘Em and I knew you were bankrolling my actions, I would be a lot less cautious (and play a lot less well) than I would if I knew that I was risking my own money.

Instead this administration thinks it can continue to bailout lenders and enforce wise behavior through regulation.

The best regulation is the lender who knows that he or she will lose the money by taking bad risks.

PackerBronco on July 16, 2010 at 3:04 PM

A full collapse is the only cure…

PatriotRider on July 16, 2010 at 3:04 PM

Now that Fannie and Freddie are completely protected by the new financial reform, why not?

Enoxo on July 16, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Gov’t pushing risky lending again?

Excuse me?

When did they ever stop?

CPT. Charles on July 16, 2010 at 3:09 PM

Kate Venne, a spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority, said borrowers must meet strict underwriting requirements and complete a home-buyer education course.

The deadbeats have to take a course before borrowing $100Ks. There you you go everyone, no need to worry.

angryed on July 16, 2010 at 3:09 PM

Let’s burn it all down and start over. It’s past time Claire.

SirGawain on July 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Illegal Alien…?

No problemo, just make your mark on the bottom line and fill out this Democrat voter registration card.

… Enjoy the house!

Seven Percent Solution on July 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Obama needs to find a Fannie to kick.

Steve Z on July 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM

Fannie and Freddie are in the vanguard of the social engineering now going on….that’s why they escaped the Financial reform bill.

The inventory of foreclosures are going to be delivered to individuals currently section 8 housing. They will be subsidized by the same Fannie and Freddie.

Get ready.

rickyricardo on July 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM

The inventory of foreclosures are going to be delivered to individuals currently in Section 8 housing.

rickyricardo on July 16, 2010 at 3:14 PM

The story is conflating some things, though.

You aren’t getting a home equity line of credit with a $1,000 deposit. You only get those when you have equity into the house.

lorien1973 on July 16, 2010 at 3:16 PM

Shirley Davis, a 66-year-old retired phone-company administrator who lives in Brooklyn, N.Y., is more than $33,000 in debt, earns just $2,414 a month and filed for bankruptcy in June. Shortly before that, she ripped open an envelope from Capital One Financial Corp., which pitched her a credit card even though it sued her in 2006 to recover $4,470 she owed on a different card from the bank.

First Rule of Holes…

The Capital One Vikings have their hands in Government pockets. What’s in your wallet?

Steve Z on July 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM

**yawn** This is old news. In the last six months, I have received 3 offers from my mortgage company (5/3). Each offer was for the same thing:

125% Loan to value
No asset verification
No income verification
yada yada yada

I should take them up on it, then pay CASH for a similar house across the sreet and down a oouple and tell them bye bye (as MANY others have done here in southwest Florida). But then I have to live with myself…. granted, I’d be living without a big mortgage payment ;)

CC

CapedConservative on July 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM

Got ammo?

GarandFan on July 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Yes. Yes, I do.

Dominion on July 16, 2010 at 3:28 PM

This had such a devastating impact on home owners in its initial stage, how can they not make it permanent and totally wipe out the assets of the average home owner?

Bawney Fwank and Dodd, we all know are out to destroy America and turn it into an idiocracy, I wonder what Scott Brown’s excuse is other than wanting to make Teddy’s office permanent?

Hening on July 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM

They really want to destroy everything

blatantblue on July 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Why yes, yes they do as a matter of fact.

Ditto GarandFan’s rejoinder,

Got ammo?

Archimedes on July 16, 2010 at 3:35 PM

Liberals never learn, or they simply don’t care. It’s always about “stimulus.” Here’s an interesting take.

Wonderbra Economics: Obamanomic Keynesianism Explained Using Victoria’s Secret Models

“With the topic of Keynesian stimulus now so prevalent, that for some reason everyone, even economic Ph.D.’s feel entitled to chime in with their useless opinions on whether or not it is appropriate for your overleveraged economy, we would like to present this very educational anecdote about the Obamanomic version of Keynesianism as it pertains to jobs, explained by Daniel Mitchell of the Cato Institute. The kicker – Victoria’s Secret models. If after this one still doesn’t understand the wonderbra approach to pushing up our economy, one is hopeless.

From Cato@Liberty:

The White House is claiming that the so-called stimulus created between 2.5 million and 3.6 million jobs even though total employment has dropped by more than 2.3 million since Obama took office. The Administration justifies this legerdemain by asserting that the economy actually would have lost about 5 million jobs without the new government spending.

I’ve decided to adopt this clever strategy to spice up my social life. Next time I see my buddies, I’m going to claim that I enjoyed a week of debauchery with the Victoria’s Secret models. And if any of them are rude enough to point out that I’m lying, I’ll simply explain that I started with an assumption of spending -7 nights with the supermodels. And since I actually spent zero nights with them, that means a net of +7. Some of you may be wondering whether it makes sense to begin with an assumption of “-7 nights,” but I figure that’s okay since Keynesians begin with the assumption that you can increase your prosperity by transferring money from your left pocket to your right pocket.

And since any reference to Victoria’s Secret would be a major tease without at least a clip from several recent Fashion Shows, here they are.”

videos: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/wonderbra-economics-obamanomic-keynesianism-explained-using-victorias-secret-models

Can’t wait for the Bawney Frank version.

Cody1991 on July 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM

The Obama administration wants to take away your cupcakes & soda’s. Odd, that the bloated government nanny hasn’t mentioned your financial diet.

TN Mom on July 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM

Commerce Clause!

/crr6

Del Dolemonte on July 16, 2010 at 3:39 PM

Some Dem Senator was moaning abot about the FFs not being addressed in the FinReg bill but the jerk voted for it anyway. Make sense to me,

marinetbryant on July 16, 2010 at 3:46 PM

“At some point we lost you as a customer our sanity and we’d like to have you back join us

Until government understands that consumption does not produce wealth, they will continue to try to prop up the economy by encouraging more consumption. It’s insanity but it’s the only thing they know how to propose. Politicians can never suggest austerity. It does not sell. They can only suggest more consumption.

keep the change on July 16, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Tell me why Fannie and Freddie were NOT part of this Financial Regulation “Overhaul” that just passed congress?

Atlanta Media Guy on July 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM

Not sure where to invest now…
The union pensions of teachers were heavily invested in Oil, not anymore with BP Oil Spill and Cap & Tax around the corner.

McDonald’s? Not so fast.. HHS and M. Obama will make sure our kids never step foot inside the Golden Arches again.

Medical? Nope, Government owns them now.

Cars? Ford yes! Chrysler and GM.. government owned

Financial? Not any longer with new regs coming their way.

Utilities? Not if the FCC and Cap & Trade have anything to say about it.

Atlanta Media Guy on July 16, 2010 at 4:02 PM

Tell me why Fannie and Freddie were NOT part of this Financial Regulation “Overhaul” that just passed congress?

Atlanta Media Guy on July 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM

Two names: Frank and Dodd. There are others, of course, who made millions in a massive accounting fraud, but Fannie and Freddie are the darlings of those two crooks. They should be in jail along with their cohorts, but instead they are passing new legislation and perpetuating their legacy of crime.

In the old days it was called the “Mafia.”

Cody1991 on July 16, 2010 at 4:03 PM

psst…

R*E*D*I*S*T*R*I*B*U*T*I*O*N

Greek Fire on July 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM

The democrat party has always had a fondness for the communist way of life. They admire people like Fidel Castro,Hugo Chavez and you old timers, remember how they loved Daniel Ortega back when Ronald Reagan was President. Now we have a democrat President, who by his policies and agenda has began to transform the US into a socialist Nation along with help of the democrats in Congress and of course, the Media. This bill is going to move the Country nearer to that goal. So folks, we can expect more of the same. Have you noticed that Obama is always going on vacation. Guess who is paying for it.

flintstone on July 16, 2010 at 4:27 PM

Isnanity is…

hawksruleva on July 16, 2010 at 4:33 PM

rickyricardo on July 16, 2010 at 3:14 PM

Reparations writ large.

chemman on July 16, 2010 at 4:33 PM

keep the change on July 16, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Therein lies the problem of an economic system based on debt. Without the debt there is no money. So we must encourage more debt.

chemman on July 16, 2010 at 4:37 PM

Tell me why Fannie and Freddie were NOT part of this Financial Regulation “Overhaul” that just passed congress?

Atlanta Media Guy on July 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM

Because our gubmint has been hi-jacked by a bunch of communist f**ktards hell bent on destroying our once great nation.

11/2/2010 can’t come fast enough!

Sweet_Thang on July 16, 2010 at 5:03 PM

The other morning (Monday I think)while driving to work I heard an ABC news program talking about how bankruptcies were up and other bad financial reports but that things might be getting better because first payment delinquencies by new home buyers was down from last year. LOL, I almost ran off the road, what’s wrong with this picture?

whbates on July 16, 2010 at 5:06 PM

Fannie Mae isn’t securitizing anything right now, because nobody is buying. Their funds are coming straight from you and me and the Chinese, via the Treasury. So the White House is basically in control of their lending policies.

Even worse, the FinReg bill requires all lenders to retain 5% of the credit risk on every loan they sell or securitize, unless the loan is FHA-insured or purchased by Fannie or Freddie. So the financial and litigation risk has just increased for all non-government lending.

This Administration and Congress have thus engineered a back-door takeover of mortgage lending, to go along with their front door takeover of student lending and most auto lending. And it is only a matter of time before they use all this power and leverage to grant credit to their favored constituencies, at favrable rates and costs, with the rest of us picking up the tab.

I guess the Administration thinks nobody is smart enough to figure out what is going on here. And they may be right.

rockmom on July 16, 2010 at 5:06 PM

Paying morgages is for suckers — Free homes, the new entitlement… Now we’re talking.

Just crank up the money presses, send Biden over the China with a truckload of new bonds to sell.

drfredc on July 16, 2010 at 6:15 PM

As long as lenders feel they are protected by the government for offering risky loans, they will continue to do so and we the taxpayers will left holding the bag.

PackerBronco on July 16, 2010 at 3:04 PM

Exactly. TARP was absolutely the worst possible solution, for that very reason. As a result, we may have dodged a temporary bullet, only to contract a fatal disease. By not letting the big boys fail, those boys retained enough power to write the Dodd/Frank regulations in their favor. Now we have written “too big to fail” into the regulations, and we long-suffering taxpayers are perpetually on the hook for THEIR risks.

Too big to fail? Don’t believe it. Before TARP was formed they were all sniffing around each other’s a**holes like a pack of wary dogs, thinking they might get each other for a dime on the dollar, and to hey with the investors. The big market uncertainty back then was “whose money do we play with?” Thanks to our gutless Congress, Republicans included, they got to play with our money instead of theirs.

I’ve been saying it since TARP: by not letting them fail, well, I’ll see you in 12 years at twice the price!

ss396 on July 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM

I am starting to get those 0% credit card offers in the mail too. Here we go again.

johnnyU on July 17, 2010 at 7:53 PM

The damn RATS almost brought the world’s financial systems down, and still haven’t fixed the problem. Repeal the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act, and the two attached Clinton Amendments to it. Divest Fat Fannie, and Bloated Freddie. Our government must get back to being a Constitutional Republic, and out of the banking, housing, insurance, automobile, energy, etc, businesses. Set rules, however, step away, and let the free market rise, or fall on it’s own.

byteshredder on July 17, 2010 at 9:20 PM